Slashdot Mirror


10 Wearable Habitats To Shelter You From the Apocalypse

fangmcgee writes "The end may not be nigh, but with vicious storms, severe flooding, and rising temperatures becoming the new normal, the apocalypse might be closer than we think. In the case of a cataclysmic event that could displace thousands, if not millions, of people, the availability of emergency shelter becomes a pressing concern. Here are 10 'wearable shelters' that serve as protective all-weather garments in the day and insulating dwellings at night."

22 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Universal survival tool by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 5, Funny

    All one needs is a towel.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    1. Re:Universal survival tool by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      All one needs is a towel.

      That isn't entirely correct. One of the big issues I have with Mr. Adams is that he totally ignored WD40 and Duct tape. I don't care if he thinks he knows the answer to everything, your travel bag is not complete without those two essentials.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Universal survival tool by Noughmad · · Score: 5, Funny

      That may be true. However,

      More importantly, a towel has immense psychological value. For some reason, if a strag (strag: non-hitch hiker) discovers that a hitchhiker has his towel with him, he will automatically assume that he is also in possession of a toothbrush, face flannel, soap, tin of biscuits, flask, compass, map, ball of string, gnat spray, wet weather gear, space suit etc., etc. Furthermore, the strag will then happily lend the hitch hiker any of these or a dozen other items that the hitch hiker might accidentally have "lost." What the strag will think is that any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it, slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still knows where his towel is, is clearly a man to be reckoned with.

      To summarize, if you know where you towel is, other people will lend you WD40, duct tape, cats and toast with butter. That should be enough for any apocalypse.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    3. Re:Universal survival tool by g0bshiTe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Strange, add WD40 + duct tape + towel and you get 42.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  2. -1 Annoying by pspahn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Main reason I often don't read TFA? Because of trash sites like the one linked in TFS.

    Anything where normal parts of the article are disguised as ads (or vice versa) is an immediate bounce for me. Present your content like a responsible adult and people might read.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  3. Re:Not impressed by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    And none of these can be created with a 3D printer. What is wrong with these people?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  4. Apocalypse? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Funny

    How can they handle the apocalypse when they can't even handle being Slashdotted?

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  5. Is anyone else sick of the Apocalypse mame. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This Apocalypse stuff is really starting to annoy me. If civilization falls, it will be gradual. And we won't go back to the stone age.
    Why because we know how to not live in the stone age.

    We know about metals and melting ore to to create them. We know about magnets and how they can be used to generate electricity or using electricity to create maniacal energy. We understand that silicon has a semi-conductive state and how to arrange semi-conductors into not gates and not gates into And and Or gates and further on to a computer.

    As a group of people we know a lot of stuff. and will not live like in a stone age. Short term we may be living in camps. But we would have a lot of things to help out.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Is anyone else sick of the Apocalypse mame. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This Apocalypse stuff is really starting to annoy me.

      That I agree with, but remember, this is marketing hype. "Apocalypse" is trending pretty high right now, so it's one of the buzzwords that's en vogue. Next week it might be "Green," oh wait that was last week; thus is the mercurial nature of advertising.

      Long story short, "Wearable Apocalypse Shelter" probably generates a lot more impressions than "Stupid Art Projects That Emulate Clothing"

      If civilization falls, it will be gradual.

      Depends on what causes the fall; an asteroid strike, fast-moving plague that wipes out 3/4 - 2/3 of the human populace, or all-out nuclear holocaust would tear down what humanity has built in a hurry. Hell, some anomalous event that completely wipes out all digitally-stored information, but doesn't touch infrastructure, would be pretty devastating to modern society.

      We know about metals and melting ore to to create them. We know about magnets and how they can be used to generate electricity or using electricity to create maniacal energy. We understand that silicon has a semi-conductive state and how to arrange semi-conductors into not gates and not gates into And and Or gates and further on to a computer.

      Collectively, perhaps that's true. And, presuming our civilization has a long fall that does not include destruction of knowledge (which, as any student of history can tell you, never happens; consider the Library of Alexandria, for example, which was believed to have contained the sum of human knowledge up to that point in history - burned by invading armies).

      However, there are some issues. First, we should presume that any information that is stored in a purely digital format (i.e., no hard-copies, or so few hard-copies that spreading the knowledge across a vast geographic area quickly without electronic transmission would be nigh impossible) would be lost completely. Second, we should also consider that it's likely a majority of survivors would either A) not understand much of the material, and thus consider it to be more useful as fuel than as knowledge, or B) be too busy just staying alive to care how things like semi-conductors, which would not be essential to daily life, work. So, aside from the 0-day loss of all digital-only information, you'd also see a steady decrease in the amount of material available due to human nature (and, let's face it, general stupidity).

      Plus, presuming the need to completely rebuild civilization from the ground up, computers are one of the last items to consider in terms of importance. So, while falling all the way back to the actual Stone Age is pretty unlikely, considering, it's not too far fetched to imagine the post-apocalyptic future as a modified reboot of the Iron Age.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Is anyone else sick of the Apocalypse mame. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      There's a long way between stone age and microprocessor. I couldn't build a transistor, but I do know how to make charcoal, which can make a fire hot enough for smelting, so I could make crude metal tools. There's not much by the way of dark ages technology that is difficult to make. I could also build steam engines, although not very efficient ones given the tolerances of the materials I'd likely have to work with. More importantly, I could build a plow that could be pulled by an animal and know about things like crop rotation and irrigation. It's not a lifestyle that I'd choose, but it's a lot better than living in a cave. If sheep are available, I could even card, spin, and weave wool to make fabric. These things are all fairly basic knowledge that I'd expect a fairly significant fraction of the population to retain.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Pointless story. by ttucker · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is a collection of ten photos of art projects, which are neither useful, nor available for any practical use. Sort of like showing an exotic concept car.

  7. Why is this on Slashdot? by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not survival gear, it's silly jackoff "art" and it's not news for nerds and it doesn't fucking matter.

    Want to survive? Arm your mind, arm yourself (with a legal concealed weapon) and have a serious bugout bag and serious clothing (including BROKEN IN combat or hiking boots).

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  8. Re:Shelters for people who don't need shelter. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

    RTFA, most of these were intended for existing homeless people in cities, or for temporary mass refugees. Not paranoid survivalist teotwawki gun nuts who presumably can just buy a regular sleeping bag and/or bivy.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  9. Re:Shelters for people who don't need shelter. by g0bshiTe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or better yet a blue tarp, multifunction at it's finest, fold your gear into it and it's a makeshift Yukon pack http://kayakdave.com/2012/09/13/how-to-build-a-yukon-portage-pack/ it also doubles as a makeshift tent at night or in rain.

    Part of surviving something like that is too look like you have nothing. Someone with a ragged tarp looking backpack may be less of a target than someone toting a North Face backpack.

    This guy http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz179/556mp/IMG_3213.jpg probably stands a better chance of not getting robbed as opposed to this guy http://attractions.uptake.com/blog/files/2009/06/camping-backpack.jpg who you can clearly see has a nice toasty warm sleeping bag and even a foam sleeping pad.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  10. I'll be the envy of all... by mt1955 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... at the next Occupy Movement sit-in with my new Ecouterre wearable habitat!

  11. News for nerds by harvestsun · · Score: 2

    Stuff that matters

  12. Apocalypse .. or light spring drizzle? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

    And lo, out of the four corners came a misting of water that fell on all the sons of Abraham.
    And the iniquitous were chilled slightly by it, and proclaimed their shame...
    The children of the lamb were sheltered by their light clothing.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  13. Re:I like turtles by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 2

    Are you a turtle?

    YBYSAIA!

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  14. Everyone PANIC! by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the case of a cataclysmic event that could displace thousands, if not millions, of people, the availability of emergency shelter becomes a pressing concern.

    The things that will actually make a difference in your ability to survive a cataclysmic event have very little to do with simple products you can buy. Some things that will make a huge difference:
    - How much warning you get: The more time you have, the more survivable the mess is.
    - Your willingness to believe the warning: If you don't believe it (not uncommon at all), you won't react in time to do anything useful.
    - Whether you have the resources to get to somewhere else in between the warning and the actual cataclysm: If you don't have anywhere to go, don't have a car, etc, then leaving is much more difficult.
    - Your willingness to lose most of your stuff: Many people have died going for their valuables rather than going to a safer place.
    - Whether you have any chronic medical conditions: A lot of deaths in disaster areas are people not getting the medication they need to treat chronic illness.
    - Your age: Elderly and young children will get the worst of it.
    - Your physical fitness: If you're hale and hardy, you can consider options like loading up everything you need in a backpack and walking out of the disaster area. If you're morbidly obese, you can't.

    Basically, the standard strategy for dealing with a serious but localized disaster is (1) Try to get everyone out of there before it strikes. (2) After it strikes, bring as many supplies into the area as you can while getting as many people out of the area as you can as quickly as possible. (3) As the people are leaving, start fixing the underlying problems to the degree possible. (4) As the disaster area recovers, people start trickling back in.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  15. I don't think that's going to work... by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Frilly cover over a miniskirt and heels for the Apocalypse? About as good as a wrapper on a hamburger, and will probably serve the same purpose.

    I would envision something like a space suit, with chain mail over Kevlar to resist bladed weapon puctures and bullets. It would not need to be airtight, but would allow a slight overpressure for nuclear/biological/chemical survival, something like armored firefighter turnout gear with SCBA, with an armored helmet with facemask.

    Accessorize with melee weapons and big guns...ouila! The fashion statement of the Apocalypse.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  16. Re:6th mass extinction of biodiversity by khallow · · Score: 2

    You can't argue with biodiversity plummeting towards the zero axis.

    But it's not actually plummeting towards the zero axis, let us note.

    Nothing like this has ever happened before

    You're making the fundamental error of assuming that geological era mass extinctions are measured in the same way that the current era's extinctions are. For example, the extinction that marks the end of the Cretaceous period killed 75% of all organisms that left fossils. It is worth noting here that the only large animals to survive were reptile scavengers like crocodiles. That is, if you were a large land animal of the Cretaceous and you didn't feed on dead meat or could survive months without food, then you didn't make it.

    In comparison, plenty of large animals survive today with little threat looming on the horizon. That tells me right there that the harm of the current period of humanity is exaggerated.

    In case anyone's wondering, there is no likely solution to this, because the extinction isn't being caused by anything as simple as CO2 or global warming, it's being caused by destruction of habitats as a direct result of what we call "civilization". Good luck trying to get humans to stop the impact of technology on the biosphere and live with nature, it's not gonna happen.

    The likely solution is the creation of some wilderness zones, which has already been shown successful in North America.

  17. That won't work either. by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would envision something like a space suit, with chain mail over Kevlar to resist bladed weapon puctures and bullets. It would not need to be airtight, but would allow a slight overpressure for nuclear/biological/chemical survival, something like armored firefighter turnout gear with SCBA, with an armored helmet with facemask.

    Accessorize with melee weapons and big guns...ouila! The fashion statement of the Apocalypse.

    Spoken like someone who has never hiked long distance. Weight is your enemy.

    You are no better than the fashionista, proposing something so utterly impractical yet "cool" looking.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").