Xerox Photocopiers Randomly Alter Numbers, Says German Researcher
First time accepted submitter sal_park writes "According to a report from German computer scientist D. Kriesel, some Xerox WorkCentre copiers and scanners may alter numbers that appear in scanned documents. Having analyzed the output of two such devices, the Xerox WorkCentre 7535 and 7556, Kriesel found that "patches of the pixel data are randomly replaced in a very subtle and dangerous way": in particular, some numbers appearing in a document may be replaced by other numbers when it is scanned."
So, it has come to this.
You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
Kriesel found that âoepatches of the pixel data are randomly replaced in a very subtle and dangerous wayâ
Slashdot users are advised not to use Xerox copiers for submissions.
That's Xenu, not Xerox.
Hey, even photo copiers and faxes need freedom of speech.
Good is never enough, when you dream of being great!
Huh?
I'm sorry. I understand those 6 words individually. But when you put them in that order, they don't make any sense.
Read? The? Article? You are not making any sense, man!
I lack the proper attention span to read the article. Let's make a deal: I quickly skim through it, and soon return here with another completely wrong conclusion. Be back in 30 seconds.
OMG, my Canon ImageRunners are doing the same thing! It must be a virus!
I'd better write up a research document on this and request some grant money.
This was a decision by Xerox to get around ever being sued for copyright violations...
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
That's what she said.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
It's just a bug in the NSA eavesdropping algorithm.
I printed out the article in order to hang it on the wall above my office's Workcentre as a warning to coworkers. But apparently printing it fixed the problem, because the article headline became:
"Xerox scanners/photocopiers Scan Documents Flawlessly and are the Best in the Industry"
You came up with the exact same conclusion as the author of the article you just read:
Hey now, there's no need to accuse me of reading the article just because I looked at the pictures.