Slashdot Mirror


Google's Second Generation Nexus 7 Benchmarks

MojoKid writes "Google's second gen Nexus 7 tablet is a worthy successor to the original, boasting an improved design both internally and externally. It's thinner and lighter, has a faster Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro SoC, 2GB of RAM, a higher resolution 1920X1200 display and it's running the latest Android 4.3 Jelly Bean release. The display alone was a nice upgrade in a 7-inch slate that retails for well under $300. However, it turns out the new Nexus 7 is also one of the fastest tablets out there right now, with benchmark numbers that best some of the top tablets on the market, especially in graphics and gaming. From a price/performance standpoint, Google's second generation Nexus 7 seems to be the tablet to beat right now."

43 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. well gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I better buy one quick then

    1. Re:well gosh by Deathspawner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the right decision.

    2. Re:well gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah ... unless you're planning on modding it with AOSP

    3. Re:well gosh by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was planning to pick one up until I read this.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:well gosh by RMingin · · Score: 2

      I am the target market, I bought two original Nexus 7s, and later a Nexus 10, and I love them. This news is deeply distressing, I was already unhappy at the number of binary blobs needed to make the N7 and N10 go, to find out that the N7-2 won't even have public restore images as a result of them is a deal breaker.

      I've just gone from "will buy an N7-2 when the budget allows" to "totally disinterested". You can't even try out third party ROMs on your N7-2.

      You've missed the boat, Google. You forgot what it was that made Android awesome, and now it's time to leave you to it.

      Upvote parent if it comes off of +5, please.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
  2. Android 4.3 breaks many Bluetooth keyboards by tepples · · Score: 5, Informative

    My benchmark: WPM cut in half. Reason: I had to switch back to the on-screen keyboard because just as changes to Bluetooth in Android 4.2 broke support for the Wii Remote, changes to Bluetooth in Android 4.3 broke several popular Bluetooth keyboards, including the ZAGGkeys Flex that I happen to own (source).

  3. Amazing device. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I picked one up when I found them in stock at my local $big_box_electronics_retailer. I already have a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, which was a cool device when I picked it up.

    This thing, however, is a whole other universe. The UI is snappy and responsive and fast. Fastest I've ever seen on any Android device. No lag, no jitter, no stuttering while scrolling. The display is amazing. Everything is sharp. Colors are well defined and look "deep". It packs as many pixels as my 1080p HDTV in to a 7 inch display. (And people say we're not ready for 4k HDTV. Pfff)

    Android 4.3 really ups the game. All of my google services migrated over just by logging in. Most of my apps came too, but some bugged. (I suspect they were not compatible)

    I liked my galaxy tab. Nice, small, flexible tablet with lots of geeky stuff to do but I had to root it to get rid of the crapware Samsung shovles on to it. That's what I like most about this new nexus. It's a clean out of box experience loaded with core apps that really have a high quality experience. (You know, the Google apps services you're probably going to use regardless. That's really the big appeal here. Don't fool yourself)

    Yeah, it's like an ipad in that regard.

    1. Re:Amazing device. by icebike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reports like yours out weigh any benchmarks.

      Haven't we learned never to trust benchmarks yet?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Amazing device. by symbolset · · Score: 2

      When icebike endorses an AC, we need to ask if she was the AC.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Amazing device. by Sun · · Score: 2

      No offense intended, but this isn't a review. Come again after you've actually used it.

      Personally, I do not intend to buy the new Nexus 7 at least until it will be possible to build AOSP for it (but I might go out and buy the old one now :-). That said, I have nothing for or against it.

      All I'm saying is that your comment did not add information. The comment you'll write in 24 hours likely will, however.

      Shachar

  4. Vote with your wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No open source driver, you can keep your hardware!

  5. If you don't mind a dead battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It certain does not excel on the battery life metric.

    1. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 4, Informative

      Compared to?

      According to TFA, it's "up to 9 hours." The original Nexus 7 had 10 hours, so it's an hour less. But considering it has to drive that Retina-like display, it's pretty darn good.

      Battery life as tested in a lab, rather than leaving it up to the manufacturer.

      Tablet Battery Life
      Nexus 7 (2013) 7:15
      Apple iPad mini 12:43 (WiFi)
      Apple iPad (late 2012) 11:08 (WiFi)

      http://www.engadget.com/2013/07/29/nexus-7-review-2013/

    2. Re: If you don't mind a dead battery by deathguppie · · Score: 2

      Mine must be a fluke then. I'm writing this response from one and haven't plugged it in in three days. Admittedly I haven't been playing movies the whole time just surfing playing YouTube videos and the like but it lasts at least twice what my galaxy s2 does for the same usage. I've had other tablets and this one needs the least charging of any I've owned. 72 he's and still a third of a battery left.

      --
      once more into the breach
    3. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the manufacturer's claim. The tests I've seen, using real-world things like more than 50% brightness and wifi put it at about 6-7 hours. Similar tests on iPads Minis regularly get 9-10+ hours.

      But brightness is the key power sucking feature. And nobody I know runs any android tablet at full brightness.
      You might have to do so outside on a sunny day. but typical living room / office use I have the brightness slider almost to the lowest possible setting. In a bright room I might move it up, but never so far as a quarter of the way.

      Disclaimer: not a nexus tablet.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      from the comments:

      "CNET, in their battery test, which plays a video at equal and measured brightness levels across devices, found the following results for the new Nexus 7 :

      Video battery life (in hours) : Google Nexus 7 (2013) 11.5, Apple iPad Mini 12, Google Nexus 7 (2012)10.1."

    5. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The iPad Mini costs a lot more than a Nexus 7. If you really need >7 hours active use per day out of your tablet you are gonna have to pay for it. If you prefer Android there are other tablets or external battery packs.

      It's hardly surprising that the Nexus 7 has a lower run time than the iPad mini. They weigh about the same (iPad slightly heavier) but the Nexus 7 has a much better screen, which of course needs more power to run. If you plan to spend 7 hours looking at a 7" screen it might as well be a good one.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by jon3k · · Score: 2

      Your iPad mini is also slower and has a far lower resolution display.

  6. In related news by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 5, Informative
  7. Here's your chance to put up or shut up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you give a rat's ass about open software, you'd pass up this device which was the cause for the lead of AOSP to quit in disgust, and sign up for the Edge on Indiegogo which promises to be completely unlocked.

  8. Not Buying it by hackus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No Replaceable Battery
    No ROM possible.

    Just plain NO.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re: Not Buying it by glennrrr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You might want to do yourself a favor and attach a Kill-A-Watt to that P4 for a month and see what that cheap old hardware is costing you.

  9. Yawn ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

    Perhaps some might be oooh and aaah over yet-another-tablet, not me

    What I am looking for - especially from tech firms such as Google - is something totally new, something that is revolutionary, not evolutionary

    Nowadays all the new smartphone and tablet offerings sound much like new cars - ooooh, model 2014 Buick is so much better than the ones in 2013, with shiny wheels, with more comfy seats, more safety features, it gonna be great, really ?

    A 2014 Buick (or Chrysler or Toyota) is a car, just like a 2013 Buick (or Chrysler or Toyota). There's nothing revolutionary anymore in cars, and unfortunately, nor for the smartphones / tablets

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Yawn ... by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tough customer. I suggest you just keep waiting until Google introduces its wearable solar powered subspace search appliance.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Yawn ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

      Well, then don't buy one, and don't bother to let us all know how underwhelmed you are -- we're underwhelmed that you're underwhelmed.

      What I am looking for - especially from tech firms such as Google - is something totally new, something that is revolutionary, not evolutionary

      But you have NO idea of what that would be, and you're going to sulk until such time as they do? Right.

      There's nothing revolutionary anymore in cars, and unfortunately, nor for the smartphones / tablets

      And for the most part, this has been true in the industry for a very long time now. The machine on my desktop now is an exceedingly boring direct descendant of the one that sat on my desk 25 years ago -- a screen, keys, and a box full of stuff to make it go.

      With a 4 digit ID, you should bloody well know that. Name 5 truly revolutionary pieces of technology in the last 25 years in the realm of computers ... anything which came from existing technology in any way doesn't count. Because, after all, that's just evolutionary which seems to make you sad.

      Tell you what, you go build something freakin' awesome, and when you get back, we'll all piss and moan about how it's not nearly cool enough.

      Your existential malaise is something best savored by yourself.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Yawn ... by gmuslera · · Score: 2

      The "promise" of Ubuntu Touch is that is a tablet or phone... until you connect it a keyboard and maybe a monitor, then it becomes a desktop computer. Thats one possible new approach (but for this tablet in particular won't happen until Qualcomm open up the drivers, so for now avoid it), but probably a lot of approachs would be to have devices that gets enhanced or behaves different by what you connect to them. There are other approachs, like several kind of convertible notebooks or pluggable keyboards, but most of the new ones comes with Android (not a desktop OS) or Windows OS (bad for every device it runs).

    4. Re:Yawn ... by Nethead · · Score: 2

      You're right, Gigs. I must be getting old.

      I hear you on the rack stuff. I've got enough stashed away to start a small ISP, if it was 2003 again. Glad I passed on that Cisco 7509 a few years back. But I remember back in the late 90s we were the hot kids on the block (or in the telco hotel) with a pair of T3s going into one.

      It's sad how some of this stuff ages, and how loud the fans are.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re:Yawn ... by slaker · · Score: 2

      I've got a 24 thread/48GB/108TB system in my back bedroom in spread across a couple 3U Norco chassis (desktop-style PSU and cooling and thankfully almost no noise) that can service a dozen 3Mbit real-time video transcoding requests through Plex and still has the horsepower to run five not-insubstantial Guest VMs at the same time. That machine actually saves me money because it replaced four i7 rigs that I had been using but I can't imagine what possible reason I could have for any more hardware than that.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    6. Re:Yawn ... by EEPROMS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shame it has a Qualcom chipset because now for me as a hardware hacker it is off my list of toys to buy. The only thing of interest for me lately the the Ubuntu edge mobile, hopefully they avoid the qualcom mess.

    7. Re:Yawn ... by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      How often do you really need a revolution? I'd say a revolution is a once in a lifetime type thing. Many people would consider the smartphone revolutionary and they didn't exist 10 years ago! In theory you should be waiting another 70 years or so for the next true revolution. Or how bout just the cell phone? That was invented 30-40 some odd years ago so we still have 40 years to go. Or the internet (about the same time). Or digital computers? Now were getting to something that happened almost a lifetime ago. But in the mean time people have also gone to the moon and somehow made it profitable for everyone involved to sell a packet of ramen, a full meal to some, for under $0.15! Including transportation across the world! You want a revolution? Take your pick. The problem you might be having is that you are around for all of the other technologies and events that make today's tablets possible. You really think in a world of 7 billion people, there is a completely new unique idea that has not appeared in prior human history? Think of the craziest bleeding edge theory you can think of and search IEEE and you'll probably find dozens of papers on the subject already. Unless aliens show up and give us warp drive and transporters I doubt any new technology will meet your standards of revolutionary.

      While I'm here, I'll give you the revolution you want from google: the self driving car. Which conveniently takes care of your cars gripe as well.

    8. Re:Yawn ... by N1AK · · Score: 2

      No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

      I think that's an over simplification but ultimately we are reaching that point in the smartphone/tablet market. The very first devices were heavy, had low res screens, couldn't run or store high quality video, had shockingly bad cameras etc. Each year the new models were better in ways that were genuinely meaningful to users.

      I just upgraded from a galaxy S2 to an S4 purely because my old contract ran out. It's two years newer and other than a slightly better battery life the screen (bigger and higher res) is basically the only difference I notice. Actually to be fair the camera is better as well so I do actually take photos of things from time to time now. Ultimately all those two years have done for a normal user is removed some of the shortcomings of the older model. Now the screen is huge (for a phone) and high-res it isn't a shortcoming to improve in future.

    9. Re:Yawn ... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      There should be some way to sell computing power to cloud customers. Like a live-CD Linux distribution you boot, and it connects to some online exchange to see if anyone wants to rent virtual machines. If nobody is offering enough cash to cover your power costs then it sends the machine to sleep. However, CPU power efficiency improves fast enough that even if the hardware is free and sitting idle in your garage, you still might not be competitive with specialist cloud providers. (Then there are the inevitable issues about data privacy, reliability etc.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    10. Re:Yawn ... by bfandreas · · Score: 2

      No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

      Well, then don't buy one, and don't bother to let us all know how underwhelmed you are -- we're underwhelmed that you're underwhelmed.

      What I am looking for - especially from tech firms such as Google - is something totally new, something that is revolutionary, not evolutionary

      But you have NO idea of what that would be, and you're going to sulk until such time as they do? Right.

      There's nothing revolutionary anymore in cars, and unfortunately, nor for the smartphones / tablets

      And for the most part, this has been true in the industry for a very long time now. The machine on my desktop now is an exceedingly boring direct descendant of the one that sat on my desk 25 years ago -- a screen, keys, and a box full of stuff to make it go.

      With a 4 digit ID, you should bloody well know that. Name 5 truly revolutionary pieces of technology in the last 25 years in the realm of computers ... anything which came from existing technology in any way doesn't count. Because, after all, that's just evolutionary which seems to make you sad.

      Tell you what, you go build something freakin' awesome, and when you get back, we'll all piss and moan about how it's not nearly cool enough.

      Your existential malaise is something best savored by yourself.

      While everything derives from everything(standing on the shoulders of giants) there are a couple of things that absolutely spring to mind:
      -This ePaper thing. I've watched it growing from an idea to the Kindle eco system. It absolutely changed the way I consume the written word.
      -Media compression. I have ripped all my CDs which I collected since the late 80ies. I've ripped all my DVDs which I bought since the 2000s. I've rebought a lot of my comic collection in a digital format. That also absolutely changed the way how I consume media.
      -eCommerce. Back in the 80ies I was really, really happy if I could get the odd Stephen King or Garfield book in English. Booksellers rarely stocked them and anything I wanted(if I even knew it existed) had to be ordered. Now I have a wide range of things available on short notice. Even the things out of the ordinary.
      -the WWW/search engines. When I got my first internet connection back at university Gopher still was a thing. It was arcane and something only for insiders. The sheer amount of infomation I now have at my finger-tips boggles the mind. When I learned to program I had actual books for APIs. Information is not readily available if you have to leaf through 3 volumes at 300 pages+ each. If you watch a movie and you stumble over a historical context that you weren't aware of you can search the net for it and have that information available. Before we had that you would have to try your luck with an encyclopedia which may or may not contain what you were looking for. If you could find it.
      -global communication. We are now able to communicate with very little limitations with each other world wide. Before we had that ordinary people who never left their home country hardly got to share ideas or got confronted with other points of views from a different cultural background. We still suffer from the culture shock but I can't stress how much I learned about places without ever having been there.


      If you only look for revolutionary stuff from a technical point of view then yeah, you only see the same old. But if you take a look at how technology alters your own behaviour then there has been a lot going on the last couple of years. Take it frome somebody who still remembers bits of the 70ies and the 80ies that life has changed quite a lot and our individual potential has increased drastically. Sadly, people still are kind of stupid. Which propably will not change anytime soon.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
  10. No micro SD slot? by hack++slash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not interested.

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  11. Re:Still no SD card... by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Think of all the marketing data that will drift up a US network.
    Your face, your friends faces, your family faces, video clips, locations, times, what you pass on the way to work, what you do on weekends..parties..hobbies
    No more taking the card out.
    They want "the NSA cloud" to become the new normal.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  12. Not a worthy successor by larwe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Until Google realizes that storage expansion is a MANDATORY feature of media consumption devices (Used on planes, road trips, and many other places where Internet access is unavailable), no Nexus device is a creditable replacement for anything. The Asus MemoPad HD7, which is the non-bullshit OEM version of the N7 G2, while slower, is a much better device solely for the reason that it has a microSD slot. No microSD slot = no sale.

    1. Re:Not a worthy successor by N1AK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until Google realizes that storage expansion is a MANDATORY feature of media consumption devices (Used on planes, road trips, and many other places where Internet access is unavailable), no Nexus device is a creditable replacement for anything.

      How the fuck does this get +5 insightful. iPad = No expansion, iPad mini = No expansion, Nexus 7 = No expansion yet they are all selling very well thank you and I bet sales of portable DVD players are looking pretty pathetic by comparison. They clearly are credible replacements, even if they don't fit some peoples use cases. How full of yourself do you have to be to believe that something not suiting you means it's not going to sell, especially when faced with a shit load of evidence that it already is.

  13. Re:Ordered mine and got it yesterday by Cito · · Score: 2

    I will agree with you on that, if the nexus 7 2nd gen had a micro sd slot it would be the greatest tablet ever at this moment and no other tablets would even compare.
    Google/Asus hit it out the ballpark with the 2nd gen nexus 7. They do make 1 piece OTG adapters though if you don't want to use an OTG cable

    here is a 1 piece OTG adapter: http://amzn.com/B00BFYH11Q

    it's 1 piece, gives you full usb access to add external drives, you can also use xbox 360 or ps3 controllers to play many games, the FPS is kinda fun now with my xbox controller.

    but I do wish they would have added a sdcard slot, but I can deal with the OTG cable when I need to copy over stuff or whatnot.

    most time though I don't need it since I can use ES File Manager and access all my shared hard drives on the lan and stream/copy files over and even install apk files over the lan. And use remote desktop apps to remote control my desktops and such so while I do miss the sdcard slot, it's not that big of a deal anymore since apps give you access to shared drives on lan, or otg cable or 1 piece otg adapters give you access to external usb devices.

    you can also plug in a 1 piece micro sdcard to usb adapter if you wanted, but it's still good.

    it is a nice piece of hardware, and im not really a fanboi, it's my first android device. my only other mobile device had been a newegg acer 400 dollar laptop bought 3 years ago and an old ipod touch 3rd gen.

    but this new nexus 7 2nd gen is crazy and im kicking myself in the ass for not trying android sooner, it's sooooo much better than iOS on my ipod touch.

  14. When does a toy become a tool? by tepples · · Score: 2

    No toys for me until the student loan is paid off and my retirement is properly funded.

    But without tools, you can't work to fund your retirement. When exactly does a toy become a tool?

  15. Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 2

    The only writable file system for removable media that works with stock Windows XP is FAT, on the modern form of which Microsoft holds patents that won't expire until the end of 2016. These patents have been upheld in both Germany and the United States. Windows Vista adds UDF as another possibility, but the SD Card Association has instead adopted Microsoft's newly patented exFAT for 64 GB and larger cards, and people will expect to be able to eject their exFAT-formatted SDXC cards from a computer and insert them into a mobile device. The easiest way to avoid having to pay Microsoft for a FAT license is not to include a means for external storage on a device in the first place.

    1. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by unrtst · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's a long, complex line of useless excuses.

      There are so many simple solutions.

      When you stick a card in a phone, just have it pop up a "would you like to format this card for this device?" question.

      For compatibility with exFAT, let people buy an app that adds the support.

      if formatted by the phone, stick 2 partitions on it, the first a normal FAT that's tiny (or even dos), and stick FS drivers on it.

      Or just say, no, you can not put the card in a machine. For example, look at the replaceable hard drives in PS3's. That'd give the maker the ability to use any FS they want, and that would even make it more suitable for expanding the local storage, which would make the whole thing more user friendly / transparent to the user.

      Or they could just license it and pay the couple pennies a device (there are already multiple implementations for andoid).

      There are other Android devices that include support and are cheaper (ex. Galaxy Tab 2 7.0), so it's also proven possible and feasible.

      Former posts are right... they just want the cloud.

    2. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 2

      That's a long, complex line of useless excuses.

      Sometimes legal arguments take a form that may resemble "a long, complex line of useless excuses" to an outsider, where "so many simple solutions" each have their own distinct flaw.

      When you stick a card in a phone, just have it pop up a "would you like to format this card for this device?" question.

      The problem here is that you can't make it clear enough to an non-expert user (that is, to the majority of users) that this will cause irreversible data loss. First, reformatting from exFAT to something else will cause the user to lose all data stored on the memory card. Second, when the user reinserts the memory card in a Windows PC, Windows will prompt the user to reformat it back to exFAT, again causing the user to lose all data stored on the memory card.

      For compatibility with exFAT, let people buy an app that adds the support.

      Such an app would have to access the SD card as a raw block device. I'm not sure Android even allows an application such low-level access on a device that's not rooted.

      if formatted by the phone, stick 2 partitions on it, the first a normal FAT that's tiny (or even dos), and stick FS drivers on it.

      A FAT partition containing Ext or UDF drivers would have to include the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Ext2 IFS (for Windows) and OSXFUSE with the Ext2 module and some GUI wrapper. Do those all exist, and are those all redistributable? Besides, good luck installing a file system driver if you're not a member of the Administrators group.

      Or just say, no, you can not put the card in a machine. For example, look at the replaceable hard drives in PS3's.

      Isn't the hard drive in a PlayStation 3 console behind screws? That's a lot more effective way to drive home the point that "no, you can not put the card in a machine" than a spring-loaded microSD card slot. To solve this, there'd have to be a closure for the microSD slot that's less convenient to open.

      Or they could just license it and pay the couple pennies a device

      Are you sure the FAT and exFAT royalty is a couple pennies, or is it a couple dollars? I'm willing to consider whatever citation you can provide. But I'm under the impression that Google is trying to keep the price down to compete with the Kindle Fire.

  16. iPad 3??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Why is the benchmark comparing with iPad 3? Why not iPad 4 and iPad mini?

    iPad 4 has :
      Geekbench of around 1780 (vs. iPad 3 at 756).
      Sunspider at 834.7 (http://www.anandtech.com/show/6472/ipad-4-late-2012-review/4)
      Compared to the iPad 3, has a 10% higher OpenGL fill rate. Almost 50% higher OpenGL triangle performance. Double the Egypt FPS. (http://www.anandtech.com/show/6472/ipad-4-late-2012-review/4)

    It seems like the iPad 4 would beat the Nexus 7 (2013) in everything, so why did they omit it from the benchmarks? Is this a conspiracy or bad journalism?

    The iPad mini seems to have performance equivalent to iPad 3.