Slashdot Mirror
Amarok 2.8 "Return To the Origin" Released
jrepin writes "Music player Amarok 2.8 has been released and it brings a fancy audio analyzer visualization applet, smooth fade-out when pausing music, many UI improvements and visual tweaks including better support for alternate color themes, significantly enhanced MusicBrainz tagger, power management awareness with a pair of new configuration options, and performance optimizations and responsiveness tuning all over Amarok."
Irony: every major version after 1.4 has been worse than it
I ditched Amarok over a year ago. Once they lost the option to make it a small interface similar to xmms I got rid of it. Even on a quad core with 8gb of ram the thing froze, couldn't handle large play lists and just sucked.
it's must be the fact that i'm over 30 and no longer take LSD.
I've been quite happy using Audacious in Lubuntu compared to say in the past when i've tried Clementine and Amarok and I found they both felt bloated almost like iTunes for windows.
You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
Am I the only one who stuck with Foobar2000 back in the day, once Winamp self destructed?
I mean I have the rather... shoddy... Google Play Music on my Android Tablet, but on the PC, Foobar2000 does everything I thought I needed. Is there a compelling reason to try Clementine / Amarok?
With all the Amarok 2.x haters that show up to complain any time it's mentioned, you'd think Amarok 2 is the worst thing ever, on par with iTunes, but it's not. It's still a damn good client, and I prefer it over the 1.4 series (or Clementine) for varous reasons.
Amarok's smart playlist functionality has improved a lot since 1.4, and is miles ahead of Clementine, for example, allowing you to set up complex rule chains for creating random playlists that continually trim old entries and add new as you listen. Clementine finally got Amarok 1.4's smart playlists back, but they're completely overshadowed by the Amarok 2 series version.
UI flexibility is another thing I prefer; Amarok uses KDE's dockable panels model, so you can modify the interface to have as many or as few panels as you want, and even add and remove tabs to each frame. The default is a three-panel setup that works fine on widescreen, but I trim it down to a two panel layout with various tabs on the left panel. Meanwhile, Clementine offers very little flexibility in appearance, staying true to Amarok 1.4, so it's "my way or the highway". Great fit for the GNOME folks, I guess.
It also has some interesting features for finding lyrics, artist info, etc., though I use them infrequently and can't say much about them, other than they seem to work and would be useful to someone that uses them more.
People complain about the extra features and the flexibility, but that's sort of the point of Amarok. If you don't want that, stick with Foobar or mpd (which I also use, they have their places as does Amarok).
http://getnightingale.org/ seems to be coming along nicely. I'm a bit biased but it really is a nice multiplatform player. We've even got feature/bug bounties setup now (we don't handle the money, it's through this site, which tracks our github issues:https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/230233-nightingale-media-player-nightingale-hacking).
We almost have gstreamer 1.0 and xulrunner 9 working with it...from there it's upgrading some other stuff and getting it stable, and we'll be golden. All of you are free to join and help us develop!
Well just because you can't get it working... Jack is one of the most powerful tools you can have at your disposal for audio production.
Am I the only one who saw the headline and thought wow has Mike released another 60 minute masterpiece, but sadly its just a new version of a music player :(
You need to set -semantic-desktop for kdelibs and systemsettings
solves the problem and even keeps strigi off the build.
Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
there is one and it's called QMMP that uses QT4 and is a clone of xmmp and is what I use as clementine failed on me, amarok 2 stinks, nitghtengale fails to build along with a rash of others that simply don't do what I want and that's play my music.
Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
I have over 4000 tracks in amorok On shuffle right now...
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
I guess I wasn't clear. I've had "-semantic-desktop" set globally (in make.conf) all along. I dumped Amarok when it started insisting it wanted kedlibs(+semantic-desktop), and nepomuk (which I refuse to install) as well.
I would like consumer stuff to work properly too, like the Xonar DX.
To me, the Winamp clone was Audacious (down to the winamp 2.x UI clone compatible with skins, like winamp 5.x). Then I got fed up with it. I still recommend it if your window manager doesn't have the bug with the sub windows in winamp 2 mode (developers says it's the window managers's fault and wontfix, and they appear to be technically right but it sucks on Mate or LXDE or at least last times I tried it). The worst stuff is what they pay attention to, the gtk3 interface, (non skinnable) looks good but sucks donkey balls : you can't resize the columns. They wontfix either and think we'll have to like it, but this mean you can't even have a file manager and the playlist side by side on a 1280 wide display, and be able to read shit!
tl;dr : I now use deadbeef which is like a clone of Audacious gtk3 but with more usability.
Slight weird thing, shuffle is under "playback" drop-down menu and "order" rather than click on a shuffle button.
+1 for QMMP. :p ).
While it's still a < 1.0 release, it gets the job done (it plays
Also, there are a fair amount of skins for it, as it accepts skins for Audacity or XMMS.
At the moment I use one which replicates exactly the good old WinAmp 1.0. Hell, it even has the WinAmp name on each window... For the curious, here it is
Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
Also found Amarok to be buggy, now listen using Audacious with a winamp skin I've used since the 90's (tubeamp).
Why cant any one make a freaking working music player for linux just like winamp classic is?
I have enough karma, so I'll go ahead and say it: People with proper creative vision are repelled by the whole "Linux desktop" morass. I have to wonder if anyone who worked on Amarok 1.x felt they had been undermined; I know a lot of KDE users did.
Guayadeque can handle that many. I have over 20k in there right now and it works just fine.
What bug? Can you find it still in the bug tracker? Have you tested 2.8 to see if it's fixed?
* A fancy audio analyzer visualization applet
* Smooth fade-out when pausing music
* Many UI improvements and visual tweaks including better support for alternate color themes
With priorities like this, we can expect a decent application in about two decades I guess.
I feel so sig.
I read the release name and thought for a moment they'd realised the error of their ways since 1.4. Sadly no. I will continue to use Clementine.
soylentnews.org
Is it just me who thinks Amarok is a ridiculous piece of software which is bloated to the max, yet misses basic features or makes them hard to use ? For me, the previous version was an example of everything that can be wrong with audio players. Let's see what this one has to offer.
Well just because you can't get it working... Jack is one of the most powerful tools you can have at your disposal for audio production.
Now if only the tools used to control it weren't complete and utter unmitigated shit, you might really have something there. Trying to figure out why JACK won't do what I want it to do which it claims to do is an exercise in frustration which exceeds even pulseaudio.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Why don't you just try xmms2? It does all that shit.
Personally I use rhythmbox. It's my answer to banshee, because it does all the same crap and doesn't give your system Mono.
I assure you that it can handle more than 500 tracks. I can literally just shuffle play through my entire music collection. It has literally never crashed on me.
I've tried amarok, songbird, banshee, lots of others. All sucked. Rhythmbox sucks least
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
I prefer moc. It doesn't waste CPU time with silly and useless animations, and it works from the console.
Knowledge is power; knowledge shared is power lost.
I just want one that can handle fixing my collection, preferably on multi-platform since I'm on Win7. MP3Tag works fairly well but I'd rather have something that can handle anything thrown at it without a lot of manual intervention. When the length of songs are known, it should be able to auto match to the version of the album I've got, including extra tracks. - HEX
Horror & SciFi Erotic Nudes
What would be so hard about analyzing the FFT every 1/10 sec for the power specturn in pitch frequency and attempting to assign a note name to the pitches? Make that the visualization, sheet music of a sort, and I don't mean just a piano roll kind of thing. There have been attempts to do this since at least 1970. One doesn't have to be perfectionistic and determine meter, two triplets is good enough for 6/8 time and so what if measures aren't drawn?
I imagine that works great when you're trying to play your copy of Jonathon Coulter's greatest hits, some people have music collections that actually need some kind of management.
If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
I guess I wasn't clear. I've had "-semantic-desktop" set globally (in make.conf) all along. I dumped Amarok when it started insisting it wanted kedlibs(+semantic-desktop), and nepomuk (which I refuse to install) as well.
That's broken packaging on Gentoo's side. File a Gentoo bug report.
Amarok never recovered after 2.0.
If Amarok was so bad, why is it so popular?
According to https://www.ohloh.net/p/amarok it has a rating of 4.5/5.0 and "High Activity" with 56 current contributors (400 overall; not even counting translations as they are in another repo (SVN not git)). That's a lot for only a music player.