Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu Edge Draws Nearly $13M, But Falls Short of Indiegogo Goal

Nerval's Lobster writes "The crowdfunding campaign to build an Ubuntu-powered smartphone has fallen short of its ambitious goal. Canonical, which works with the open-source community to support Ubuntu worldwide, decided to fund its Ubuntu Edge smartphone via crowdfunding Website Indiegogo. The funding goal was set at $32 million, and at first it looked as if the project had enough momentum to actually succeed: within the first 24 hours of the project's July 22 launch, some $3.45 million had poured in. But that torrent of cash soon slowed to a trickle. In the end, the campaign managed to amass $12,809,906 by its August 21 closing. Nonetheless, Canonical did its best to put a brave face on the situation. 'While we passionately wanted to build the Edge to showcase Ubuntu on phones, the support and attention it received will still be a huge boost as other Ubuntu phones start to arrive in 2014,' the organization wrote in a posting. 'Thousands of you clearly want to own an Ubuntu phone and believe in our vision of convergence, and rest assured you won't have much longer to wait.'" Update: 08/22 16:14 GMT by T : Oops -- headline edited to reflect that the Edge was an Indiegogo project, rather than Kickstarter.

27 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Smart idea by rotaryexpress · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Using a crowd-funded campaign like this gives Canonical a very good idea about just how much interest there is in the phone essentially for free...and if they met that goal they'd be all the better.

    1. Re:Smart idea by eric_herm · · Score: 2

      Not for free. The campaign had to be organized, the buzz too. Basically, it would have been cheaper to make a proper market study rather than losing credibility, time and money into that. Especially since they hired someone to design the phone in the first place.

    2. Re:Smart idea by Githaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How did they loose credability? They told us up-front that if the campaign did not reach is funding goal we would get our money back. Meanwhile, everyone gets to see how much demand there is for a Edge-like phone with only a month notice and little paid marketing. In the end, I would say the campaign was successful and we will probably be seeing Edge-like phones being offered within a year or two.

  2. Of course it did by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one trusts Canonical outside of the die-hard Ubuntu fanboys. Canonical forks everything due to their NIH syndrome. They released the buggiest, ugliest and most uselessly incoherent Desktop imaginable (Unity) and then sold their userbase to Amazon.

    The Edge could be the greatest thing since sliced bread, I still wouldn't give them my money.

    1. Re:Of course it did by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2

      Really?

      I haven't tried it yet, but a couple of my friends really dig the UI on Unity and haven't complained about bugs. I was actually going to download a Live CD this weekend to try it out

    2. Re:Of course it did by tapspace · · Score: 2

      I actually like Unity. It's only problem is bugs (and that it's spyware). If everything worked as designed, I'd be pleased as peaches. I am disappointed that I have to replace it after finding out it is spyware (probably after a year of using it).

      I have disabled the tracking features (I think), but that is not enough. I cannot in good conscience continue to support the project (and very likely, I will switch from Ubuntu as well in the near future).

    3. Re:Of course it did by Entropius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I use Linux for a living (I'm a physicist; all our machines run Linux). Most everyone was using Ubuntu (with a few on Scientific Linux) before Unity came out. Now it's Mint, mostly, or Kubuntu.

    4. Re:Of course it did by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No one trusts Canonical outside of the die-hard Ubuntu fanboys.

      Maybe, but...

      Canonical forks everything due to their NIH syndrome. They released the buggiest, ugliest and most uselessly incoherent Desktop imaginable (Unity) and then sold their userbase to Amazon.

      We're talking about *phones* here. The bar is far, far, FAAAAARRRRRRRRRR lower than you give it credit for. Seriously, the bar is buried down a mineshaft somewhere. You'd have to get a mole machine just to see it.

      The main competitors are iOS and Android.

      Forks/NIH? CHECK!

      Well, iOS is more or less their own thing with their own language and their own API and everything. Android pretends to be Linux but for some reason they keep fucking with stock Linux is strange and incomprehensible ways which make it work less well. Oh and inventing totally new and broken APIs which then need fixing. Android is stuffed to the gills with NIH, compared to Unity.

      then sold their userbase to Amazon.

      Remember the BIGGEST competitor is android here. Basically you get to choose to sell yourself to google.

      The Edge could be the greatest thing since sliced bread, I still wouldn't give them my money.

      Who would you give money to? I mean your points are correct and they apply to desktop systems. But phones are SO bad by comparison that Unity really is a shining beacon of standards and openness.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Of course it did by metiscus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      AC calling a poster in the 6 digit club an astroturfer. People are allowed to have opinions that are different from yours you know. Different opinion != shill/astroturfer

    6. Re:Of course it did by Entropius · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can do that on other Linuxes too, using the alt-f2 shortcut.

      I've tried Unity, and my biggest grumble is the removal of the taskbar. If I have four papers open in different copies of evince/okular and five terminals with different names, Unity won't let me find the one I want quickly. It also won't let me see, by looking at the taskbar, if any of them have changed their titles (which some programs do to alert the user).

    7. Re:Of course it did by Windwraith · · Score: 2

      This. Unity in a phone would be a damn dream compared to how Android handles tasks and everything.
      I remember seeing someone saying below (I guess the post was moderated out) that Android was pretty good for usage...that is, if you only use ONE task at a time. Trying to switch tasks, specially quickly (try browsing for a file while trying to respond quickly on Skype. Even with helper apps it's not as easy as touching an icon in the left, no matter what).
      The app paradigm, as we know it, is only use-friendly for the app itself. Unless there's a visible task manager that you don't need to hold a key for 1 second to invoke, or something else that doesn't require returning to the desktop, Win 3.1 style, Android is horribly flawed for anything that is not one thing at a time.
      Sure, nowadays there are sidebars in android (that look suspiciously like Unity's bar), but they tend to be either 4.x only, slow, the "launcher hotspot" tends to be in the way, or use the screen entirely. Oh, or full of intrusive ads.

    8. Re:Of course it did by js_sebastian · · Score: 2

      I think the maxim "change is hard" applies to this situation. It was annoying to change, but frankly, I think Unity is better than the old desktop interface. In the end it is "much ado about nothing" and people simply prefer to have things get better without enduring the learning curve of more dramatic changes. I've been using Unity for quite a while and I've found no bugs, so I don't know what people are talking about.

      I started using Unity with 12.04. It was different in the sense that there is basically a "Dock" rather than a "Desktop Menu" (which, frankly, makes it harder for those who don't know the name of the program they want to use; e.g. you can't just select the default mail program, you have to search on "Thunderbird").

      Just tried this: typing "mail" in the unity dash brings up thunderbird as first option. Just like typing "video" brings up movie player as first option. I'm not sure exactly how this works, but the search is not based exclusively on the application title, and generally seems pretty successful at bringing up what I am looking for when I make a fairly generic search.

  3. Missed the boat... by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    I hate to say it but Ubuntu has missed the mobile boat. It would have been nice to have an open source alternate to Android and iOS. I use Android but I've got to say, it gives me the creeps the more I read about Google and how they are mining our data with seemingly no regard for their customers.

    1. Re:Missed the boat... by tom229 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can still use android. You just have to use an AOSP implementation without Google Apps. This is the beauty of open source.

      Personally I'd recommend FDroid with Cyanogen Mod. It's an open source repository of android apps. Theres lot's of trustworthy 3rd party repositories you can add to it, and you could even make your own.

      Many popular proprietary android apps also offer direct apk downloads from their website. It's actually easier than you might think to survive on android without a google account and google play.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  4. Re:Good by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you smoking?

    Smartphones will likely replace desktops when docked at some point.

  5. Re:Good by somersault · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The smartphone is severely limited in its interface, its power, its scope, its precision, and its visuals.

    No. Smartphones are limited in their intended uses sure, but the hardware is very capable of general purpose work. Smartphones are increasing in power at a much faster rate than desktop and laptop machines.

    PCs have no such limitations.

    Wat.

    There is still a desktop market, and always will be; don't let the naysayers clutching their toy phones tell you any differently.

    Desktops are cheaper, but outside of very specialised applications, laptops are good enough for most uses. In fact, modern smartphones are good enough.

    This is your only hope now that we've proved that betting the farm on a toy device is not a smart idea.

    Nobody was betting the farm on this. It was just an idea. People probably said the same thing about personal computers (vs mainframes) back in the 70s/80s.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  6. Re:Good by Stuarticus · · Score: 2

    I was totally with you up until you said KDE...

    --
    If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  7. Marketing ... by tgd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IMO, the goal was deliberately set too high to meet. Now all the money goes back to the donators.

    Huge amounts of free advertising, hype generation and likely leverage in existing negotiations with hardware vendors, care of the interest $13m worth of donations the "chumps" who bought into it loaned to Indiegogo for a couple months.

    Smart. Very smart.

  8. Re:Good by somersault · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A netbook isn't good enough for web browsing? The only reason I can't use a phone or tablet for 100% of my internet use, is that some youtube videos aren't allowed "on mobile" for some stupid reason.

    I used a netbook as my primary development and home usage machine for several months, simply to squash my ego somewhat (before that I'd always gone for the most powerful machines I could). It was actually surprisingly usable. For doing more engineering oriented work I did need to remote into more powerful computers though, so now I have an ultrabook.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  9. Re:Good by Githaron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think Canonical's mistake was limiting the campaign to a single month. I am sure there were a lot of people that wanted the phone but did not have the liquid cash to purchase one with only a month notice. If it was a three month campaign, I could see them reaching their goal.

  10. Re:Good by bieber · · Score: 2

    Considering that hasn't happened with laptops yet, I'd be very surprised to see it happen with phones, at least in the near future. Just like with laptops and desktops, just because you can mostly get the same performance in a much smaller form factor doesn't mean everyone's going to want to pay the premium for the smaller size.

  11. Re:Good by Vaphell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the key difference is laptops are big, heavy and unwieldy and nobody likes to lug them around for the sake of it. Since you are going to have a smartphone with you at all times either way, why not give it even more utility? Most people don't have elaborate needs that require full blown PC monster, but would love to have access to all their shit wherever they go. If the phone can provide that, great.

  12. Re:Good by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    In some places it has. For instance, my mom is in a job that often requires her to work from home. So her company gave her a laptop that is secured and can access their network at her house. At work, she puts the laptop in a dock that is connected to a monitor: dual monitor workstation. When she goes home she takes the laptop with her to use at home if needed. It really is much more efficient and cheaper than giving her a desktop for work and a laptop for home use.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  13. Indiegogo v. Kickstarter by Fnord666 · · Score: 4, Informative
    As one commenter said:

    *Indiegogo. Whatever.

    Actually it does matter a great deal. A key difference is what happens to the money if the project is not funded to the goal level. On kickstarter if the project misses its goal, no money changes hands. On indiegogo campaigns can be set up as "Flexible Funding" and the hosts get whatever is pledged (minus 9% for fees).

    From the Kickstarter page:

    Why is Kickstarter funding all-or-nothing?

    On Kickstarter, a project must reach its funding goal before time runs out or no money changes hands. Why? It protects everyone involved. This way, no one is expected to develop a project with an insufficient budget, which sucks. Remember you set your own funding goal, so aim to raise the minimum amount you'll need to create your vision. Projects can always raise more than their goal, and often do.

    From the Indiegogo FAQ

    What if I don't reach my funding goal?

    If your campaign is set up as Flexible Funding, you will be able to keep the funds you raise, even if you don't meet your goal. If your campaign is set up as Fixed Funding, all contributions will be returned to your funders if you do not meet your goal. Flexible Funding campaigns that meet their goal are only charged 4% as our platform fee, whereas campaigns that do not meet their goal are charged 9%.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  14. Re:Good by gauauu · · Score: 2

    Considering that hasn't happened with laptops yet, I'd be very surprised to see it happen with phones, at least in the near future. Just like with laptops and desktops, just because you can mostly get the same performance in a much smaller form factor doesn't mean everyone's going to want to pay the premium for the smaller size.

    While it hasn't completely happened with laptops, it has to a great extent. At my office, most people get assigned laptops. 80% of the time, they are attached to a keyboard/mouse/monitor. The only people I know who buy desktops at home tend to be gamers or developers. Everyone else buys laptops. So no, they may never _completely_ replace desktops, but they might for the average user.

  15. Re:Good by js_sebastian · · Score: 2

    Good graphics cards are big. Most people don't need them, true, but PC gaming is still very much alive - Diablo 3 has sold about 15 million copies. That's about a half _billion_ dollars right there, for one game.

    Sure, your converged phone won't replace a gaming rig for hardcore gamers, but not everyone games, and not everyone who does does so on the PC.

    People have been predicting the death of the desktop for decades, whether due to consoles, laptops, mobiles, whatever. It's never going to happen while good graphics cards and processors need a lot of cooling, and therefore are big.

    Who's talking about death of the desktop? Desktop is useful for some people. But again, not everyone games on the PC, strange as it may seem to you. With 16GB of ram on my laptop, I could easily do all my development work on my laptop, once attached to a bigger screen and keyboard.

    The only reason laptops haven't taken over from desktops is that you can't make a laptop do what a desktop does for a similar price, and in some cases not at all. Good luck getting similar performance from a phone.

    Newsflash: laptops HAVE taken over desktops, in the sense that more laptops are sold than desktops, by about a factor 2 in 2012 http://www.inquisitr.com/76157/tablets-to-overtake-desktop-sales-by-2015-laptops-will-still-reign/, and that's excluding netbooks. Why? because performance is good enough for most people. Because the price differential is not quite as big as it used to be, and is worth it for many people in exchange for the portability. Tablets and netbooks are each also moving a comparable number of units to desktops. Again, they're good enough for many uses for many people.

    Give it another couple iternations in performance, storage and battery improvements, and phones will be good enough for most people too, and will just need a bigger screen and keyboard to be usable for running most desktop applications, except for high-GPU users like games, photoshop, etc.

  16. Re:Good by slacker001 · · Score: 2

    It's gotten to the point where it's almost odd for me to see a desktop now. At my office only a few people still have desktops because they're not up for a replacement yet. Those that are get a laptop. I've got a laptop now that sits docked most of the time, connected to my external mouse/keyboard and dual monitors. Same thing at home - my laptop replaced my desktop, but when it's time to do Real Work it gets connected to my external mouse/keyboard and dual monitors. Aside from serious gaming I don't see anyone buying desktops anymore, and I can't wait until the day when my phone can be docked just like my laptop and run real apps like Photoshop, Lightroom, and even a full browser rather than the mobile touch-friendly version.