Slashdot Mirror


New, Canon-Faithful Star Trek Series Is In Pre-Production

An anonymous reader writes "Star Trek veterans such as Walter Koenig (Pavel Chekov), Tim Russ (Tuvok), Robert Picardo (the Doctor) and others are busy in pre-production of a professionally produced pilot episode for a suggested new online Star Trek series named Star Trek: Renegades, which will be faithful to the original Star Trek canon. The events of the series are placed a decade after Voyager's return from Delta Quadrant. When the pilot is complete, they'll present it to CBS in the hopes that it'll be picked up. They have also opened an Indiegogo campaign, seeking more funds from Star Trek fans to help make the production even more professional. They've already reached their primary funding goal."

25 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. Shades of Blake's 7 by fredrated · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sigh me up.

    1. Re:Shades of Blake's 7 by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don’t sign me up.

      Star Trek for me always had a certain ethos. Peaceful exploration, conflict could be solved with enlightened rational diplomacy. There were a few phaser blasts, but it always ended on a positive optimistic note about the future. Yes, Kirk was a big Boy Scout.

      “This necessitates more drastic measures, some of which are outside the Federation’s jurisdiction.”

      This is not Star Trek. This is not optimism in human (and alien) nature. I could be a fine show – it just not going to be good Star Trek. It would be like the Doctor running around with a Sonic Blaster instead of a Sonic Screwdriver. Just the wrong vibe.

    2. Re:Shades of Blake's 7 by jythie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While optimism was always a major part of Star Trek, the franchise has shown over the years it can explore darker themes and still be intellectually interesting. If it is all phasers and boob shots I agree it is not really 'Trek and would (for me at least) be painfully boring,.. but there is a lot of potential in exploring a weak federation that has to make (and live with) more complex moral choices.

      I imagine the devil will be in the details, and being good or bad will come down to what they actually do with this situation.

    3. Re:Shades of Blake's 7 by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So then DS9 was not Star Trek?

      Because it was the best series they ever made.

    4. Re:Shades of Blake's 7 by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My two favorite ST episodes were DS9. Far Beyond the Stars and In the Pale Moonlight. Both were kinda dark, but you're right...the power that they had was being a culminating part of a larger story. The writing was also great, unlike any other Trek series, the characters had depth and moral ambiguity. Much more like people I'd actually meet than one-dimensional paragons of virtue.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    5. Re:Shades of Blake's 7 by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Peaceful exploration, conflict could be solved with enlightened rational diplomacy.

      I must have missed that one. For the life of me, I can't imagine any episode where Kirk didn't shoot, punch or screw at least one of the guest stars.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  2. YES PLEASE! by maliqua · · Score: 5, Insightful

    recent star trek movies make me sad time travel and rewriting is the tool of lazy sci-fi writers out to make a buck on an established name.

    1. Re:YES PLEASE! by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No place to go? It's an infinite universe with an infinite timeline. Therefore, there are an infinite number of things that could happen that don't involve interactions with anyone important and therefore don't affect the timeline. You could write a story about the war between the Vulcans and the Romulans, for one. That's never been explored in any depth. Heck, that could be an entire series by itself, with almost no risk of significantly violating the canon.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  3. Re:How? by jandrese · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think it is safe to say that they'll mostly ignore Enterprise, just like everybody else on Earth.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  4. Re:How? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you think that's bad, you should try being a Doctor Who fan.

  5. The Trekkies will finance by ikhider · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Somehow, I don't think they will have trouble getting funding for this. I am sure Wil Wheaton will be on this as well. Trekkies are a massive economic force to be dealt with. I thought the Star Trek shows were more interesting when each episode stood on its own without you having to know about the canon and universe. A cursory glance at the newer shows and I have no idea what is going on and thus no reason to care. Heck, while I am at it, why don't the script writers add a bit f science to their sci-fi. That would be nice.

    --
    "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
    1. Re:The Trekkies will finance by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I thought the Star Trek shows were more interesting when each episode stood on its own without you having to know about the canon and universe.

      Then you would have disliked Farscape as it was very serial - at least to get it all. True many episodes could stand alone, but the season/series arcs really tied things together and many details were intertwined throughout most episodes. Actually one of the reasons I liked it - though I won't discount my crush on Aeryn Sun (Claudia Black) - and most of the other women on the series :-) [ I do like strong, smart, independent women. ]

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  6. Beam me Up by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lately I've been on a Trek retrospective (Trekrospective?) thanks to Netflix and by Evil Spock's beard do I miss Star Trek

    All power to the engines!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  7. ST Continues by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Star Trek Continues is very, very good. The first episode features the return of Apollo, played by original actor Michael Forest. I've already sent them money; I'd rather see this funded than more TNG era stuff. The era had its moments, but this is a really faithful back-to-the-roots adaptation that captures the heart and soul and the *feel* of Star Trek better than anything else I've ever seen. The attention to detail is amazing. Gorn Bob says check it out: http://www.startrekcontinues.com/

  8. I wish them godspeed by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really do. And it's good to see Walter working again. But Voyager and Enterprise pretty much soured me to Old Trek. I'm sure some people will really enjoy this, and the best to them. But I'm done. I'd much rather see something (relatively) new and different move forward, like L5. Or a series based on literature that hasn't been done yet, like Ringworld or even the Heinlein juveniles. Why must we continue to flog dead horses?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  9. Star Trek: Koenig's Triumph by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    After locating the nuclear wessels (a Russian inwention), Psi-cop Alfred Bester finds a way to travel back to the 1980's and muck with Khan Noonien Singh's head (explaining why Khan recognized Chekov on Ceti Alpha V).

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  10. Re:How? by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Informative

    He's playing Doc Zimmerman. He didn't want to reprise the role of The Doctor because he's aged too much, but when it was suggested that Zimmerman would have aged the same as he did, he was onboard.

  11. By faithful to the canon... by arpad1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...does that mean there'll be lots of lip service to the Prime Directive while completely ignoring it? Does this mean the captain of an important Federation ship will get into fist fights as part of his duty as well? Will there be significant loss of life among the crew as a regular occurrance during peace time and will the ship regularly engage in ship-to-ship combat during this same peaceful time as well?

    If the answer's "yes" then this new production will be faithful to the original.

    --
    Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  12. Re:How? by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Funny

    They could really screw with everybody and produce a timeline in which Richard Woolsey is frozen after getting seriously injured defending Earth from a replicator attack, the Stargate program is abandoned and forgotten about per an IOA mandate, and Woolsey ends up being discovered on a distant planet by the Enterprise.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  13. Self Consistency Canon by ShooterNeo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would greatly prefer if the writers for this series, in the unlikely event it takes off, focused on being self consistent.

    Don't show the "time police" one episode, complete with an enforcement vessel called the USS Relativity, that ruthlessly polices the timeline, then magically resolve all the outstanding problems by having your captain come back from the future with cheat-technology in a later episode. (because if the time police let this stand, why don't they simply give the Federation the best tech of all time from day 1?)

    Don't show a space station next to earth one movie, with a massive infrastructure, then show the Enterprise and another ship have their illegal fight between Federation warships right next to earth, so close that the Enterprises crashes into the earth in the same movie!

    If you establish that maximum warp has a speed, don't show a ship getting from the border of the Klingon neutral zone to Earth in 5 minutes of warp.

    If you establish that Bones is the medical officer on the ship, aka the only qualified doctor, and you then show the Enterprise taking massive damage with mass casualties, don't have him quietly standing on the bridge lecturing Kirk instead of getting his ass to sickbay to treat the critically wounded.

  14. Re: How? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

    I kept wondering why in the 'verse they'd ever bother with ships again. They can beam across space to other planets without that pesky years-in-hard-vacuum bit in the middle.

    Transwarp makes negotiations easier, too:

    "Captain Awesome, the Klingon ambassador demands--"

    *teleporter sounds*

    "I beamed him into the sun. What's his successor want?"

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  15. Politics... by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right now, too many careers and face are invested in the reboot. It does not matter how good or bad this would be, it is unlikely the IP owners would allow it to succeed since it would hurt the personal careers or people in charge right now.

  16. Re:How? by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Heck Cannon is out the Windows in TOS, even in TNG.

    We see Trekees or Treckers (which ever one has the negative connotation) Coming up with extended reasons to explain every inconsistency.

    Lets face it. TOS and TNG were TV shows meant to be have a full story in one episode. The fact that the guy died a few weeks ago isn't that big of a deal because he wasn't really part of the story, or the fact that minor character started to get more parts thus his history changes a bit.

    O'Brian before he got his name, was a LT, his uniform had the LT pips... Then he became a Non-commission officer. Why well early on he was just an extra with a couple of lines. Then they made him a bigger part. Cannon out the window... Who cares.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  17. Re:How? by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah yes, Enterprises' T'pol, famous from such unforgetable episodes as "T'pol rubbing some stuff on herself in the decontamination chamber", "Somebody else rubbing stuff on T'pol in the decontamination chamber" and "Could this decontamination chamber scene be any more suggestive and puritanical at the same time?".

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  18. Re: How? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ooh. I know this. The probe destroys Earth, and all the whales leave, saying, "So long and thanks for all the fish." No, wait.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.