Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Create 'Fastest Man-Made Spinning Object'

dryriver sends this news from the BBC: "A team of researchers claims to have created the world's fastest spinning man-made object. They were able to levitate and spin a microscopic sphere at speeds of up to 600 million revolutions per minute. This spin speed is half a million times faster than a domestic washing machine and more than a thousand times faster than a dental drill. The work by the University of St Andrews scientists is published in Nature Communications. Although there is much international research exploring what happens at the boundary between classical physics and quantum physics, most of this experimental work uses atoms or molecules. To do this they manufactured a microscopic sphere of calcium carbonate only four millionths of a meter in diameter. The team then used the minuscule forces of laser light to hold the sphere with the radiation pressure of light — rather like levitating a beach ball with a jet of water. They exploited the property of polarization of the laser light that changed as the light passed through the levitating sphere, exerting a small twist or torque. Placing the sphere in vacuum largely removed the drag due to any gas environment, allowing the team to achieve the very high rotation rates. In addition to the rotation, the team observed a 'compression' of the excursions or 'wobble' of the particle in all three dimensions, which can be understood as a 'cooling' of the motion. Essentially the particle behaved like the world's smallest gyroscope, stabilizing its motion around the axis of rotation."

22 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Jay Carney is all: by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You guys ain't even seen angular velocity until you've seen my press conference work."

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  2. Hey I know! by bmo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A team of researchers claims to have created the world's fastest spinning man-made object."

    A politician?

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Hey I know! by Bringer128 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, a cat with a peanut butter sandwich attached to its back.

    2. Re:Hey I know! by bmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      >The founding fathers were Christians.

      No, they were deists at best, which if you describe this to today's "christians" you'd get a horrified reaction as if they were (horrors!) Unitarian Universalists or ... atheists! Today's "christians" believe that God has a direct hand in the lives of everyone. This is in direct opposition to the "clockwork universe" view espoused by the Deists - "God set everything in motion and then abandoned the work to run on its own."

      Which is the only thing that makes sense if you're going to write papers on logic and reason, like the founders did. If you have a god that is fiddling around with everything, where is the room for reason?

      The Letter to the Danbury Baptists by Jefferson where he says "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. and the letter to the Touro Synagogue by none other than George Washington himself prove that the US is not a "christian nation" - that every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there shall be none to make him afraid..

      I suggest you read them. They're even short enough for a 4channer to read.

      http://www.tourosynagogue.org/index.php/history-learning/gw-letter
      http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html

      Jefferson's version of the New Testament Bible only came to 40 pages, after ripping out what he described as nonsense. "I have performed this operation for my own use, by cutting verse by verse out of the printed book, and arranging the matter which is evidently his, and which is as easily distinguishable as diamonds in a dunghill. The result is an octavo of forty-six pages, of pure and unsophisticated doctrines."

      People who think that the "founding fathers" were "christian" in the modern sense of the word are wrong. Paine was an atheist and proud of it.

      "Hell, the Anti-Federalists argued against the US Constitution because it didn't mention God specifically."

      This is also just plain wrong. Rhode Island's history was that of a refuge from the theocracy and other bullshit in the Massachusetts colony, where they did things like hang Quakers. The Charter of 1663 granted to Rhode Island by King Charles II a "lively experiment" in religious freedom - you could be anything you liked and not have to toe the line of Christianity or /version/ of Christianity, for example (since the natives were clearly not Christian). This was basically because of the efforts of people like Roger Williams, who didn't see the natives with the disdain that much of the English did. Go read "A Key into the Language of the Americas" for that and "The Bloudy Tenent" for his assertion that a state church "stinks in the nostrils of God," which was also cited by Jefferson when crafting the First Amendment to the Constitution.

      There was an unfortunate time when troops from MA would come into RI chasing "heretics" like Anne Hutchinson.

      Because of this history, RI was a hotbed of anti-federalism by the 1780s One of the prominent anti-federalists was from my hometown of North Kingstown, RI - William West. It's because of him (he marched an army of 1000 into Providence to protest ratification in 1788) and others like him that Rhode Island was the 13'th state, the last of the colonies to ratify the Constitution. The point of the anti-federalists was to be anti-central-government, because people like William West saw central government as antithetical to religious freedom, among other things.

      And I haven't even mentioned William Penn yet. When you're thrown into prison because of your religious views, you tend to come out of prison severely pissed off and wary of state religion.

      Don't try to tell me history. This is my back yard.

      --
      BMO

  3. Re:-- MISSING DATA SEGMENT --[byline] block not fo by multisync · · Score: 2

    did I just see that?

    Yup. I saw it too in the byline and user Slashbox areas. Gone after a page refresh.

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  4. Re:Dental drill, 600k RPM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, it spins at 666,666 RPM. Yeah, I know, all dentists are sadists.

  5. They read the Patriot Act over Jefferson's grave? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Funny

    n/t

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  6. Re:Dental drill, 600k RPM? by GodInHell · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you telling me a dental drill spins at 600,000 RPM? I seriously doubt that. That's ridiculous, it would burn your teeth and anything else it touched. You wouldn't even be able to hear the high pitch whine of the drill at that speed.

    I guess that depends who you ask Wikipedia the speed of a modern dental drill is up to 800,000rpm - but the source cited only supports up to 400,000 rpm. these guys say somewhere around 350,000rpm and 400,000rpm - which seems to agree with the other product results turned up by a google of "dental drill rpm."

    So -- if you're looking for a quick fake fact and you accept wikipedia as gospel truth - yeah, dental drills operate at over 600,000rpm - apparently the folks that sell dental drills say 300,000rpm to 400,000rpm is more realistic - still in the range of 1/1000th - off by a factor of 33% - but its PR speak.

  7. I tried... by tool462 · · Score: 2

    I spent most of the time I was reading the summary trying to come up with some really clever/sarcastic/funny comment (Electrons spin faster! -- um, no that's lame. I got it, if you spin it backwards, it just says "Paul is dead" in a chipmunk voice.)

    But then I got to this:

    The team then used the minuscule forces of laser light to hold the sphere with the radiation pressure of light — rather like levitating a beach ball with a jet of water. They exploited the property of polarization of the laser light that changed as the light passed through the levitating sphere, exerting a small twist or torque.

    That is so indescribably cool I just had to let that stand on its own. There is so much physics wrapped up in this one experiment.
    I'll just leave it at an obligatory XKCD:
    Science, it works bitches.

  8. Re: Dental drill, 600k RPM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    600,000 RPM is 10,000 revs/s. Depending on the nature of the whine, the bulk of the energy may be at harmonics, but given anything short of absolute perfect balance and symmetry, there will definitely be some at the fundamental. Most people have no problem hearing 10 kHz, and many young people will pick up the first harmonic at 20KHz.

  9. Re:Dental drill, 600k RPM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, 300000rpm would be 5000Hz, which seems to be about the right frequency of the noise made by my dentist's drill. I'm pretty sure dental drills are compressed air driven, so yeah, another factor of 2 or so is probably reasonably achievable.

  10. Re:They read the Patriot Act over Jefferson's grav by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

    His body doesn't count as a man-made object, or this wouldn't have broken the record.

    Indeed -- we aren't discussing woman-made objects here.

  11. Backstory by Azure+Flash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know the team member who first suggested this research. As a kid, he was obsessed with spinning tops, bicycle wheels and everything else he could find that spins really fast. Looks like that passion of his spun out of control as he grew older!

  12. So Then What by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2

    Is the fastest spinning object, man-made or otherwise? Looking for some perspective on this.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:So Then What by femtobyte · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, once you get into the quantum mechanical realm, you can get things "spinning" pretty darn fast, though you require increasingly "nuanced" definitions of what "spin" means as you transition from the familiar world of classical mechanics to quantum-mechanical systems.

      The magnetic moment of a proton in a 1T magnetic field precesses at ~2.7*10^8 Hz (which produces the signals that NMR looks at).
      Put an electron in a 1T magnetic field, and it is precessing at ~2.7*10^11 Hz.

      A proton's "intrinsic spin" of hbar/2, for an object with the mass and radius of a proton (~1GeV/c^2, ~10^-15m), would "classically" be equivalent to something spinning at hbar/(2*r^2*m) ~ 6.3*10^22 Hz. An electron has an intrinsic spin oh hbar/2, and a size of 0, "equivalent" to an object "spinning" infinitely fast... of course, at this point, it doesn't make much sense to describe the quantum mechanical spin as though it were a "classical" spinning object.

  13. No political jokes please by maroberts · · Score: 2

    Syriasly

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  14. Not "manmade" object, but Chuck Norris is faster by ClassicASP · · Score: 2

    Chuck Norris does not spin his right foot around and roundhouse kick you in the face. He spins the world with his left foot.

  15. Not trapped by radiation pressure by WSOGMM · · Score: 4, Informative

    Optical trapping can sometimes make use of radiation pressure, but that's generally not how you optically trap a particle, nor is that how they did it. Radiation pressure is characterized by absorption and reflection (like tennis balls hitting a wall). To trap a particle, you use refraction (when modeling the system with ray optics).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_tweezers

    The change in index of refraction between water (or air) and your particle causes the light rays to "change direction" as they enter and leave the particle. There is a net momentum transferred to the particle in the direction of the focus of the laser beam, thus trapping the particle at the focus.

  16. Re:Dental drill, 600k RPM? by EETech1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I used to have a brushless R/C motor that would turn 65,000 RPM, and I decided it would be cool to try and make a VCR head turn 250,000 RPM.

    It would spin like a top for over an hour, and made for one awesome display of 'look the fuck out' if you let it fall on edge like a wheel.

    The gyroscopic force was crazy, it was hard to move it all. I would let it slide out of the bearings and land upside down on my table and then lift the table up slightly and make it crawl uphill and try and drive it around as it spun on the stub of the shaft.

    My quest for 500,000 RPM ended rather abruptly as the bearing stuck and pulled the head and very unbalanced lower part (where the head used to be mounted that contained the bearing) out of my hand and it began tearing chunks out of whatever got in the way as it bounced around my room and I ran like hell!

    I wish I had another VCR;)

    (I'm not responsible for any injuries if you try this yourself)

    Cheers!

  17. Re:Dental drill, 600k RPM? by quenda · · Score: 5, Funny

    Per minute? You Americans use some odd units. The correct unit for dental drill rotational speed is Hurts.

  18. Re:Summary wtf by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2
    The summary says:

    This spin speed is half a million times faster than a domestic washing machine

    Similarly, I could say "30 is 10 times more than 3". The summary didn't claim that the sphere in question spun 500krpm faster than a washing machine, but 500k times faster, which is another claim entirely (i.e. that a washing machine spins at about 1200rpm).

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  19. Re:Washing Machine? by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2

    No, it explains that you wasted some poor teacher's time.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.