Slashdot Mirror


Mexican Village Creates Its Own Mobile Phone Service

Dave_Minsky writes "The small indigenous village of Villa Talea de Castro (pop. 2,500) in the state of Oaxaca is showing the world that it doesn't have to rely on major cellular telecommunications providers for service. With the help from indigenous groups, civil organizations and universities, village residents put up an antenna on a rooftop, installed radio and computer equipment, and created its own micro provider called Red Celular de Talea. Service costs only 15 pesos ($1.2) per month and a few pennies per minute to make calls to the United States. However, there is one catch: calls are limited to a maximum of five minutes to prevent saturation of lines."

69 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Max 5min on calls by Qazimov · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it bad that I would pay extra to have this 5min rule on voice calls?

    1. Re:Max 5min on calls by thoriumbr · · Score: 2

      They have a small, experimental tower, and users can saturate it quickly. Limiting each call to 5 minutes means that even on a saturated situation, everybody can use the system. You get dropped and enter the queue, and you can be sure that you can get access again later. If there's no such rule, some users could talk 4 hours straight and deny access to every other user. Here in Brazil we have dropped calls every few minutes and almost everybody accepts this as normal, so I guess the Mexican folks can handle that fine.

    2. Re:Max 5min on calls by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't think the GP is saying it's a bad idea, he's saying he'd pay for that as a feature.

      "Hi Mom, everything is OK, yes, that's a fascinating story about Aunt Myrtle ... Oh, gee, look at the time ... gottago, kthanksbye".

      Slightly more on topic, I should think some phone service would be far better than no phone service. Many of us take this kind of stuff for granted, but that's far from true for much of the world.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Max 5min on calls by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Funny

      A whole bunch of my extended family should move there... Maybe make the call limit 3 minutes or less.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:Max 5min on calls by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I don't think the GP is saying it's a bad idea, he's saying he'd pay for that as a feature.

      "Hi Mom, everything is OK, yes, that's a fascinating story about Aunt Myrtle ... Oh, gee, look at the time ... gottago, kthanksbye".

      So a technological fix for his lack of discipline / ability to simply stop someone and politely say that he/she has to go? I understand that (most) people want to be polite and don't want to blow someone off, but unlike (e)mail, a phone call (or IM) is an intrusion on the receivers immediate time and the caller should be aware of that - that's why I prefer email and don't have an IM client installed. (My wife always had a problem disconnecting herself from a rambling phone caller. On the other hand, when I need to get off the phone, I simply say so, wrap it up and go.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    5. Re:Max 5min on calls by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, but there's an investigator from Scotland Yard at the door asking for you - he would like to ask a few questions regarding the disappearance of your sense of humor...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:Max 5min on calls by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      ..because he's married!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    7. Re:Max 5min on calls by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, but there's an investigator from Scotland Yard at the door asking for you - he would like to ask a few questions regarding the disappearance of your sense of humor...

      No I got the joke, but from personal experience with people I know (like my wife), it's actually a problem for some people to be able to stop someone who's yammering on and say, "look, I gotta go." My time is important to me and certainly more important to me than yours :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  2. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I have no doubt that TFA describes a fine public service built by those of the highest integrity, I must confess that my first thought was quite the opposite, given recent history.

    It is just as unfair to assume everyone in Mexico is involved in the drug cartels as it is to assume everyone in America is a spy for the NSA and supports what they do.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. feature, not a catch by DeBaas · · Score: 3, Funny

    However, there is one catch: calls are limited to a maximum of five minutes to prevent saturation of lines."

    Every married man knows this is not a catch but a feature

    --
    ---
    1. Re:feature, not a catch by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      They need to have a family plan where it's limited to 2 minutes for the kids....

    2. Re:feature, not a catch by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Actually, this got me thinking... I can imagine someone doing the 2-sim dance with some custom firmware; after 4:59, the phones automatically establish an alternate connection and drop the previous one, for "uninterrupted" voice communication....

    3. Re:feature, not a catch by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I feel like if you're going to all that effort (entertaining though it would be) you might as well just set up your own personal tower.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:feature, not a catch by centipedes.in.my.vag · · Score: 1

      Assuming that a queue doesn't exist, preventing you from making instant connections.

      --
      Only on /. can I lose karma with 2x "5, Funny" posts.
  4. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by pipatron · · Score: 1

    Remember that the NSA is a tax-founded government agency, thus it's much more likely to assume that indeed everyone in America (I take it that you mean the United States version of America?) support what they do. At least most people voted for it, considering both parties are equally eager to keep NSA running.

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  5. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

    Remember that the NSA is a tax-founded government agency, thus it's much more likely to assume that indeed everyone in America (I take it that you mean the United States version of America?) support what they do. At least most people voted for it, considering both parties are equally eager to keep NSA running.

    You don't honestly believe that Americans have granular control over what our tax dollars are spent on, do you?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  6. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everything said there speaks to the fact that it wasn't something expressly desired. If you wanted to move out of the US you face lots of challenges. Cost of the move, immigration restrictions in destination, language barriers in destination, cost of living might be higher in destination, climate may not be comfortable(I would move to Canada if it were warmer). There are lots of places I'd move if it weren't for the fact that Americans are hated in so many places.

    Or simply a desire to live where you consider home.

    Just because you pay the taxes you are legally required to, or vote for one of the two parties from which there is to choose, does not mean you completely embrace every single ideology. You can have an icecream sunday without eating the cherry. It doesn't change the fact that a cherry died for your sunday, but you may not have had any choice in that outcome.

  7. Question by PPH · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Where did they get the frequency allocation? If it was here in the USA, all available channels would have been put out for bid by the FCC and snapped up by the incumbents. Running a system on "their" channels would be frowned upon.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Question by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Where did they get the frequency allocation? If it was here in the USA, all available channels would have been put out for bid by the FCC and snapped up by the incumbents. Running a system on "their" channels would be frowned upon.

      Hypothetical question: If everyone in the US came together and built such a system, would there be any way to stop us? Short of putting the entire population in jail, anyway.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Question by EmperorArthur · · Score: 2

      Where did they get the frequency allocation? If it was here in the USA, all available channels would have been put out for bid by the FCC and snapped up by the incumbents. Running a system on "their" channels would be frowned upon.

      The US doesn't care about negative publicity, plus cell companies/The FCC actually does give certain licenses for special events. See OpenBTS at Burning Man.

      This isn't the US, so the rules are different. I would love it if the US had a rule along the lines of "You have first choice to this spectrum, but if you aren't servicing the area then anyone can be granted a license for that locale. If you want to use that frequency there, then you have 6 months to set up towers."

      First come first served has disadvantages, but it's much more fair than the current auction system. Right now, the largest cause of the small number of cell providers is government regulation. For example, despite what I said in the first paragraph, this would never work in the US.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    3. Re:Question by Jawnn · · Score: 2

      Where did they get the frequency allocation? If it was here in the USA, all available channels would have been put out for bid by the FCC and snapped up by the incumbents. Running a system on "their" channels would be frowned upon.

      Two words for you, Junior: "pirate radio". Now get off my lawn and learn about Mexico's long and noble history of giving the finger to the FCC and other reguladores.

    4. Re:Question by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      I've thrown stuff together with a wireless access point, some SIP phones and a computer running asterisk. One of those would probably meet all the necessary requirements to work. Put a few of 'em around a city with call routing between the various asterisk nodes and it'd probably start to get pretty spiffy in no time. If you prefer a smart phone to the default SIP phone solution you can do that, as long as can install a SIP dialer on it.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:Question by iroll · · Score: 1

      Hypothetically, if everyone in the US came together and smoked a blunt, would there be any way to stop us? Or didn't pay taxes? Or ate horsemeat? Or drove without a license?

      I mean, hypothetically, if everybody in the world could just come together, there'd be no more killing, pollution, discrimination, or overpopulation.

      Realistically, not everyone will come together, and of those that do, you only need to punish some fraction of them in order to deter a significant proportion of the rest. There will always be some scofflaws, and the authorities will continue to mete out punishment to them. See: every prohibited substance ever.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    6. Re:Question by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I would love it if the US had a rule along the lines of "You have first choice to this spectrum, but if you aren't servicing the area then anyone can be granted a license for that locale. If you want to use that frequency there, then you have 6 months to set up towers."

      I wish I had mod points. A useless +1 for you since I don't.

  8. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by thaylin · · Score: 4, Funny

    (I would move to Canada if it were warmer). .

    Just give it a few years..

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  9. Is it me or does the place look *lovely*? by aoeusnth · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, that's not a picture of the village. Kinda weirds me out.

    1. Re:Is it me or does the place look *lovely*? by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      Headline: Mexican village disguises itself as Powell & Hyde in San Francisco.

      Subheadline: We discover where Rasputin gets discount CDs from.

  10. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey gringo, how do you know what we call you? Do you speak-a ma language? No you fucking don't.

  11. Cool beans, by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    However if any Canadian village tried to do the same thing then the Rogers, Bell and Telus oligopoly would mount an armed strike and blow the village off the face of the planet because only one of those three companies can provide shitty telecom services to remote Canadian villages. I bet this Mexican village is still getting better service than even many people in Canadian urban centers.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  12. So it is better than the Verizon network? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    I was lucky if I could get 1 minute before I got dropped on Verizon. These lucky people get to talk for a whole 5 minutes.

  13. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    I never hear that in the countries I visit.
    Just variations on American, like Amerikaner

  14. Re:Well by Jmc23 · · Score: 2, Informative
    No.

    Mainly because these are indigenous people, are already known for being people of few words and some might actually decide to kill you if you keep calling them mexican.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  15. Answer by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    RTFA

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  16. Cf: South Africa's "Village Telco" by ivi · · Score: 1

    WiFi + VoIP system design to enable local calls;
    add Internet connectivity to enable outside calling.

  17. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
    ah, not very good at hearing sarcasm or denigration in speech either, eh?

    Ever think that Amerikaner would be a reference to the US's hypocritical bipolar disorder? I mean, you do know what an Amerikaner is right?

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  18. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Noun[edit]
    amerikaner c (singular definite amerikaneren, plural indefinite amerikanere)
    a person from USA
    (rare) a person from the Americas
    ice cream cone with a chocolate-coated marshmallow treat and jam

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. Re:So What? by bferrell · · Score: 1

    Actually, systems of this type ARE legally sanctioned.

    Just because it works "that way"in locality doesn't mean those rules apply in the case in the article

  20. Re:Well by houbou · · Score: 1

    But, still live in Mexico.. so, how do you call them? "Not Mexicans indigenous people from Mexico?"

  21. informative video by OmarArmas1159 · · Score: 1

    Here's an informative video of the case: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRNisk2tsFM

  22. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by Genda · · Score: 1

    Ahhhhh, the tropical beaches of Vancouver... sorry, getting a frosty Moose-Head, delivered by a tanned Canuck cabana boy just makes my head hurt, Ayyy?

  23. Re:Well by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    Great! You go down to Oaxaca or Chiapas and start calling people mexican. Your ignorance of history, past and present, will be corrected quite quickly.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  24. youtube video of the case by OmarArmas1159 · · Score: 1

    Here's a video of the case: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRNisk2tsFM

  25. Re:Well by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    Depends, mexicans have inherited the same stupidity as USians and so call the indigenous people indians (they've corrected the cognitive dissonance of having two groups of Indians by calling Indians Hindus, not sure if that's better than the stupid indian indians and american indians). So, you can be ignorant by calling them mexican, ignorant and stupid for calling them Indians, or the prefered pc term used by occupiers: aboriginals, natives, or just indigenous people. It's best to ask them, since there is more than one group and they actually have names for their groups.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  26. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

    While answering the above, please enlighten everyone to what "United States version of America" even mean? What "America" is there?

    I've known some people (Canadians, Central and South Americans) to take umbrage at the fact that people in the United States are frequently referred to as "Americans", both by themselves, and from, well, a good bit of the rest of the world. Presumably, their phrasing was supposed to show that they are offended.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  27. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by pspahn · · Score: 1

    First of all, USians, or the other variation, USAians, are terms I have never heard spoken anywhere. In fact, the only place I've ever even seen this term is here on /. I can't even begin to try and prounounce it, as it is likely said with a foreign accent which I am unaccustomed to. I'm thinking something such as "OOh-shuns" might be correct.

    Second, GP simply mentioned the fact that those who hail from the United States of America, are often simply called Americans. Nowhere did he/she display any sort of "only-we-matter" attitude. That was purely inferred by yourself. Michael Jackson has a song about a mirror I think you'd do well to listen to.

    Third, I propose a new term for Europeans, since European is not etymologically significant. We shall now call them EUians. The homophonetic construct of this word also serves a purpose, but I'll leave that to EU to ponder.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  28. Have you ever been to... by gwolf · · Score: 1

    ...Any other country in America?
    I mean, any country that actually has a name?

  29. Right, and a second important word... by gwolf · · Score: 1

    Mountains.

    This particular experience is in a small town in Oaxaca. Oaxaca is a very mountainous state, with a great cultural richness stemming precisely from its orography: It is so hard to move around Oaxaca that it went practically unconquered during the 300 years of Spanish rule.

    Of course, when you look at the network coverage maps, you will immediately recognize our country is a mess full with mountains and areas where... Lets put it nicely, where people are not in the proper economic situation to enjoy the full benefits of cellular telephony. You can look at the GSM voice and SMS, 3G voice and SMS and 3G internet coverage maps for Telcel, Mexico's leading mobile operator. FWIW, Oaxaca is at the South-East of the map, but a similar argument could be pushed in many other regions of the map.

    I doubt this little expereiment will cause even a "blip" in the radars of our regulatory bodies (no FCC has no say in how radio frequencies are handled in Mexico, but we have our own COFETEL), because of this same fact: The country is too complex, and nobody is claiming that bandwidth in that area. Of course, were the experience to start replicating along small communities enough to be noticed in a map, a crackdown would surely follow.

  30. FWIW, completely untrue. by gwolf · · Score: 1

    Indigenous people are not offended by being called Mexican. More often than not, they will recognize themselves at least to be as Mexican as those of us living in urban areas are. Even the most vocal groups claiming for indigenous rights, recognition and differentiation recognize living in Mexico and being Mexicans — But demand a just, fitting government level more aligned to their shared culture than the Country/State/Municipality imposed from "Above"; this different organization level would not even amount to a fourth level, because it does not follow State borders (that were, in many cases explicitly, drawn to divide and weaken identities of the many peoples that form the Mexican nation).

    1. Re:FWIW, completely untrue. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      No, some of us really are offended. Lots of people don't like being called the same thing as the people that took their lands, abuse them as labour, talk like potty mouths with no respect for family and society, and show no consideration for nature around them.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  31. Re:Well by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

    Who cares? You don't become a tough guy by proxy for taking their side in an issue that is absolutely nothing to do with us or them. I know some white guys who might decide to kill you for being such an annoying liberal.

  32. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 1

    By "support" do you mean "pay for"? If so then all Americans "support" the NSA spying. Well, half of us anyway, but that's another discussion.

    If you meant "condone" then no, it's ridiculous to declare that "everyone in America" is in favor of those programs, even if you argue that we all voted for representatives who voted for them. First, no we didn't. Second, the more onerous details of the NSA programs weren't made available even to those representatives. Even the legislators who wrote the law on which the programs were based didn't intend parts of it to mean what NSA has interpreted them to mean.

  33. Oaxaca did it right by Alyssey · · Score: 2

    I came in to read what people thought about what Oaxaca did...instead I just found people laughing about it or about the language, geography or whatever. Meh. Let me explain, since most people either don't read TFA or don't educate themselves further. These people asked all three cellular networks to put a tower in their village, they all said no. TONS of times. So, they took the matter into their own hands. Now all three cellular networks are asking if they can help (Read: Get a piece of the pie) I am SO happy they are the ones that are now saying NO. It's interesting what us Mexicans are able to do when we're told no. We are a stubborn bunch.

  34. Re:Well by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    um, people who care about truth and precision? I know you're a USian since you don't care about that and because you automatically turned it into US and THEM, but i'm not, I'm American, so I don't know how conservative your 'liberal' is on the world scale, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't describe me.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  35. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Have you ever HAD a Moosehead? It's like Dos Equis but less drinkable. I'm sure Canada has some fine beers, but Moosehead isn't one of them. Canadians, what do you guys drink up there?

  36. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by pspahn · · Score: 1

    pspahn, stop feeding the troll.

    The Dude abides. It's a holiday weekend, I was feeling a little spicy.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  37. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

    While answering the above, please enlighten everyone to what "United States version of America" even mean? What "America" is there?

    I've known some people (Canadians, Central and South Americans) to take umbrage at the fact that people in the United States are frequently referred to as "Americans", both by themselves, and from, well, a good bit of the rest of the world. Presumably, their phrasing was supposed to show that they are offended.

    This presents more as a perpetually handy bash-the-US topic for people so inclined, rather than any true concern for the precision of language.

    --
    --- Mercutio was right.
  38. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by murdocj · · Score: 1

    Given that the NSA is violating the law, that's like saying that everyone in the USA supports car theft. It doesn't follow.

  39. Financially unviable by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    "telephone (service) providers refuse to use because it is financially unviable."

    I suspect this should translate into "not enough profitable". When shareholders want a two digit ROI figures, companies leave behind themselves any profitable project that does not result in a two-digit ROI.

  40. Re:Well by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you are not a liberal, but what you share in common with them is making implicit threats, of the form "if you don't hold X opinion, SOMEONE is going to do violence to your for it. Not me, I'm not violent, but you would still deserve it".

    You should cut that out because it's really pathetic, and also if you really thought that "might makes right", you should support the colonization of the Americas by Europeans.

  41. Cool POC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And something that has been done elsewhere in Latin America and has been shot down by the government, either due to landline State monopolies or constitutional level ownership of the radioelectric spectrum by the State. Setting up a cell and a VoIP gateway is quite easy. Governments call it "bypass" and you are fined and/or go to jail. Perhaps in this case they have special legal status or something. Otherwise this is bound nowhere.

  42. Re:Well by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    Dude, I'm warning the guy, not making threats. Learn the difference, if you're looking for some examples perhaps you should start proofing your posts.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  43. Re:Well by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

    No, you were making threats under the guise of warning him, which is a really pathetic thing to do (and you do it again later in the thread). If someone had started a thread saying "I am going to Oaxaca, what should I call the natives" your reply would have been totally appropriate. Given that the actual post referred to Oaxacan's as Mexicans in passing, your post was stupid and irrelevant. Also, my original reply was (A) worded exactly the same as yours and (B) clearly a parody of what you wrote, although you seem to dense to grasp this.

    If you think calling Oaxacan Mexicans is offensive, just say so.

  44. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by Noughmad · · Score: 1

    The Americans, living in a constitutional democracy, have almost total control over the government. It's just very difficult to exercise this control, and most people just don't care.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  45. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by shokk · · Score: 1

    Or unfair to assume that this phone service is really nothing more than two cups connected by a string, which everyone stands in line for their 5 minutes, primarily to receive a ransom call about or pay a ransom for their relatives kidnapped by a cartel.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  46. Re:Well by houbou · · Score: 1

    Ah, PC.. politically correct people... the type who smile in your face and stab you in the back.. LOL.. I would rather be plain, no-nonsense and to the point and just call a spade a spade. In the end, life shouldn't be about the labels we can be identified with, but rather the actions that we do and the way we conduct ourselves.

  47. Re:Well by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    um, calling a native an indian isn't calling a spade a spade it's just ignorant and stupid. I mean, come on, everybody found out it wasn't India centuries ago.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  48. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by doccus · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, quite. We never get snow anymore. Last winter, on the day it hit zero degrees, nobody noticed because it warmed up right away. This year spring started in the middle of January.. and, for all intents and purposes, summer started on valentine's day.Our weather is becoming like northern California used to be..

  49. Re:Other private Mexican mobile phone services by doccus · · Score: 1

    Lucky ;-)

  50. Re:Well by houbou · · Score: 1

    I've not called anybody an indian.. I don't know what you are smoking, but stop.. if you read my threads, you don't see me calling anyone an indian. NOWHERE.