Slashdot Mirror


Parallels Update Installs Unrelated Daemon Without Permission

Calibax writes "Parallels recently released version 9 of Parallels Desktop, their popular hypervisor application for Mac. They also released a new product named Parallels Access that offers access to Windows applications from an iPad for $80 per year. Access has received less than stellar reviews. When a user upgrades Parallels Desktop, he is asked if he wants a free six-month subscription to Parallels Access. Even if he says no, the product is installed on his system and the application is started each time the system is rebooted. It is installed with ancillary files scattered around several directories in the system and Parallels has not supplied an uninstaller or listed the steps to fully uninstall the application, despite a number of requests. In other words, Parallels has decided it's a good idea to silently install a difficult to remove daemon application on the system, even if the user has explicitly stated they do not want it. They have not provided an uninstaller or a list of files installed or instructions on how to remove the application files. These are scattered to at least four Mac OS X OS system level directories."

21 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. Wow! by tysonedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy Department of Redundancy Department, Batman!

    --
    Thirty four characters live here.
  2. Good to know by cob666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using Parallels Desktop for several versions now but I won't be 'upgrading' to version 9 until this is resolved. Up to now, Parallels has been a great product.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    1. Re:Good to know by Khyber · · Score: 3, Funny

      1.Upgrade to 9.

      2.Tell the fucking installer to not install that extraneous software on your system.

      3.Sue the shit out of Parallels for unauthorized access/violation of the CFAA.

      4.????

      5.PROFIT!!!!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  3. Lost a customer by danaris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been using Parallels over VMWare Fusion for a few years now (there has been some good bundle pricing on it, and there were some features it had that VMWare lacked at the time when I was deciding, though I don't recall what those were now).

    Unless this turns out to be a tempest in a teacup or otherwise invented or overblown, I won't be doing that anymore, and VMWare will have gained back a customer.

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    1. Re:Lost a customer by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On Mac, it is nowhere near as slick.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Lost a customer by danaris · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've been using Parallels over VMWare Fusion for a few years now (there has been some good bundle pricing on it, and there were some features it had that VMWare lacked at the time when I was deciding, though I don't recall what those were now).

      Unless this turns out to be a tempest in a teacup or otherwise invented or overblown, I won't be doing that anymore, and VMWare will have gained back a customer.

      Dan Aris

      Why not just use VirtualBox? Or are you not touching that due to Oracle having their fingers in it?

      I've used it, but as MightyYar says, it doesn't do as much as VMWare Fusion or Parallels on the Mac. It 3D support, for instance, still leaves a lot to be desired.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    3. Re:Lost a customer by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not just use VirtualBox? Or are you not touching that due to Oracle having their fingers in it?

      I've used it, but as MightyYar says, it doesn't do as much as VMWare Fusion or Parallels on the Mac. It 3D support, for instance, still leaves a lot to be desired.

      Yeah, like 3D, or support.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Lost a customer by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why not just use VirtualBox?

      Because VirtualBox is slow and lacks features.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  4. No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    TFS rants in circles, and the subject of the complaint is a product named "Parallels"?

    My head hurts.

  5. remote access by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Informative

    The most important part: what this daemon does is allowing remove access to the computer, through Parallels' servers, using closed source code on both sides. Let's see, is there anything nefarious possible?

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  6. Burning bridges by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you decline to install something you expect that it doesn't get installed. Parallels is going to burn a lot of trust by pulling this stunt. The cost of acquiring their customers has certainly got to exceed the profit from people who decide that they will change their mind and want to run this software anyways.

    At a bare minimum they need to start by building a package that will remove all traces post haste for the anyone that wants it. For people that don't want to run the package explicit instructions need to be made available about how to completely remove this. Any number of companies have screwed up royally before this, those that are still respected are the ones that instituted proper damage control.

    1. Re:Burning bridges by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When you decline to install something you expect that it doesn't get installed. Parallels is going to burn a lot of trust by pulling this stunt. The cost of acquiring their customers has certainly got to exceed the profit from people who decide that they will change their mind and want to run this software anyways.

      At a bare minimum they need to start by building a package that will remove all traces post haste for the anyone that wants it. For people that don't want to run the package explicit instructions need to be made available about how to completely remove this. Any number of companies have screwed up royally before this, those that are still respected are the ones that instituted proper damage control.

      This is not the first time Parallels has failed to uninstall things; I ran an installer of a trial product of theirs a few years back, and after uninstalling, still had to go in manually and clean up some components that wanted to run some sort of service. I haven't touched Parallels since. VirtualBox allows me to write my own additions, and if I need something more polished, VMWare Fusion is still rock solid.

      So it will be interesting to see Parallels' response to thiis, as it definitely puts their (paid) installer solidly in the category of Potentially Unwanted Application alongside the CNet downloader and all the bundleware coming out of Russia and China.

    2. Re:Burning bridges by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple itself does this kind of crap. Back when QuickTime was necessary to view some online video, they'd bundle iTunes and not allow you to remove it.

      Everyone does this, this happens all the time. I really don't know what the big deal is, I've installed many programs that had extra crap I didn't want and this is nothing new. Use a different product if you don't like the package.
      Firefox didn't ask me if I wanted their update service installed either, it's probably an NSA spy machine.

      Difference is that is a Windows problem. Macs are better in that you have simple folders and no registry. To back up a program you copy it to a source then copy it back and run it. No install programs that install malware. Windows users are just used to bad things.

  7. Re:Macintosh's ease of use by bomanbot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, you guessed wrong, because this article is about the Parallels Desktop Software for Macs that is installing the unwanted parts.

    Funny enough, a software like Parallels Desktop needs such low-level access to the system that it would most certainly be prohibited from being approved into the Mac App Store. Apple is pretty strict about what kind of low-level access its App Store apps are allowed and where they can install their stuff.

    So if the user would have stayed inside the walled garden, he would actually be safe from this particular threat.

    I do not want to say that the walled garden is flawless or does not have some significant problems, but your guess is really simply wrong in this case.

  8. Re:Macintosh's ease of use by Maestro485 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What exactly does Apple have to do with shoddy 3rd party software?

    Neither Parallels or VMWare Fusion are in Apple's App store. So if grandma is going to the store to buy virtualization software, I would hope she has some idea of what she is doing.

    Also, if grandma happens to hose the Ubuntu machine you gave her and she has to look at this:

    ~#:_

    Does that mean Linux is shit and just for freetard lusers?

  9. Re:Macintosh's ease of use by bomanbot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your first link is not the app store, though. That would be the online Apple Store, you know like Amazon.com? The one that actually has some brick-and-mortar cousins? With the Macs standing around and the Genius Bar? Sorta like Best Buy, but Apple-specific?

    And, also that is definitely not for download, because, you know there is a shipping estimate there? And the first picture actually shows you the physical box the software is shipping in?

    Besides, that box also contains the old version 8 which does not have the obnoxious behavior written about here. That one is new for version 9, which is not in your link.

  10. Re:Macintosh's ease of use by Zcar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Parallels is NOT sold in the AppStore. It's installed via a custom stand-alone installer.

    Of course it is...

    You do realize that's not the App store, but Apple's store where they ship you a box with the software?

  11. Re:Macintosh's ease of use by gnasher719 · · Score: 3

    Let me guess? Approved in the app store. And that ease of use that's touted by Apple means that it's helluva hard for the average person to get under the hood. Imagine grandma looking at this:

    Parallels software is _not_ available on the App Store. If you look at what this software does, there is not a chance in hell that it would be allowed on the App Store. So your little rant is completely missing the point. So when you say it is "the problem with the walled garden", you are completely wrong: This app is _not_ inside the walled garden. It does things that the "walled garden" would protect you from.

  12. Was going to buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was going to upgrade to Parallels Desktop 9 but after reading about this I might as well switch to VMware fusion 6.

  13. Mac OS X OS system? by davidbrit2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mac Operating System X operating system system?

    This is a new record for redundancy records.

  14. Back to the Future by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is installed with ancillary files scattered around several directories in the system

    Ah, the advantages of OSX. No "ancillary files scattered" all around the system when you install something. Remember when all you had to do to uninstall a Mac app was drag it to the Trash?

    But the most unsettling part of this is the fact that Parallels had to know they would be found out, and went ahead anyway. When a company gets caught with its pants down, at least there's an indication that they realize there was something wrong with their behavior. This is much worse, because they just didn't care what you think.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.