Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Getting Afghanistan Online

Posted by samzenpus on from the like-this dept.

Velcroman1 writes "Imagine living in a country where only 3.5 percent of the population use the Internet. When you ask a neighbor about Facebook, they give you a confused look. Posting a status update on Twitter is a foreign concept, and most citizens still rely on printed newspapers and radio reports. That's life in Afghanistan today, where only 1.5 million people (out of 30M) have Internet access. A new National Social Media Summit intends to change that trend. To be held September 22 to 23 in Kabul, and featuring some 200 speakers, the event will promote the use of social media as a way to not only discuss current news, but to make news. The summit, called Paiwand (or Unity), aims to boost Net use further. It will break out into several themes including social media and government transparency, new media trends and emerging tech."

10 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Tempting by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you ask a neighbor about Facebook, they give you a confused look. Posting a status update on Twitter is a foreign concept, and most citizens still rely on printed newspapers and radio reports.

    Almost makes it sound worth the constant threat of bombings, shootings, and oppression by the Taliban.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Tempting by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      well the local newspaper is as good as the local tribal leader lets it to be.

      in other words it's pure shit. that's why getting them online matters. that's why getting everyone online matters.

      because that's the a way to get them out of their highly localized dictatorship dystopias. now their life is just what the local guy with most guns and dope for his gunmen wants it to be(and unfortunately those guys aren't very industrious - and making things better for their community would make them have less power...).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Tempting by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whether the local tribal leader is named Jamaludin Badr or Rupert Murdoch.

      Except Ropert Murdoch has no means to compel you to stay away from competing publishers — neither by banning the competitors nor by prohibiting you to buy their wares.

      And that is the key difference between a government-provided service (whether it is news, education, health care, food, shelter, or entertainment) and a privately-provided one.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  2. Prime Directive by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure there are a lot of issues to fix first. But maybe many there are not ready for *all* the stuff on the net just yet..

    1. Re:Prime Directive by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, after 25 years of using the internet ... some days I'm not sure I'm ready for all of it.

      There's some strange stuff out there.

      Citation needed... And maybe some example links.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  3. Oh the humanity! by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Posting a status update on Twitter is a foreign concept

    (silently wipes a tear away from his eye)

    Also, twitter being an American company, is foreign to damn near ALL countries. As a concept, it's still weird to most Americans even.

  4. Get off my lawn! by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Imagine living in a country where only 3.5 percent of the population use the Internet.

    That's not hard for anyone who is old enough to remember the 1980s. The internet as we know it today is a pretty recent development for most of the population. Before 1990 or so pretty much no one outside of academia had internet access.

  5. Re:Priorities? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a country, where people are dying like flies from all sorts of preventable causes, and where illiteracy, ignorance and fanaticism are rife, will they REALLY welcome this?

    I thought we did?
    Oh, you're not talking about the US?

  6. Nice by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Glad to see people are focusing on the important issues... Yes after 12 years of non stop war, I'm sure facebook is a huge priority and twitter will stop all the violence.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Nice by AJH16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Giving people the ability to connect to world and understand people from other parts of it is key to peace just about anywhere? When you understand that people are people everywhere, it's far more difficult to get the general populace revved up against some great enemy. People fear the unknown and in the absence of contrary evidence, anything can be said. Now granted, it may have a more limited impact since the Internet itself is perceived as Western, but having people be able to communicate more freely is rarely a bad thing when it comes to trying to prevent popular support for attacking others.

      --
      AJ Henderson