Slashdot Mirror


Getting Afghanistan Online

Velcroman1 writes "Imagine living in a country where only 3.5 percent of the population use the Internet. When you ask a neighbor about Facebook, they give you a confused look. Posting a status update on Twitter is a foreign concept, and most citizens still rely on printed newspapers and radio reports. That's life in Afghanistan today, where only 1.5 million people (out of 30M) have Internet access. A new National Social Media Summit intends to change that trend. To be held September 22 to 23 in Kabul, and featuring some 200 speakers, the event will promote the use of social media as a way to not only discuss current news, but to make news. The summit, called Paiwand (or Unity), aims to boost Net use further. It will break out into several themes including social media and government transparency, new media trends and emerging tech."

26 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Tempting by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you ask a neighbor about Facebook, they give you a confused look. Posting a status update on Twitter is a foreign concept, and most citizens still rely on printed newspapers and radio reports.

    Almost makes it sound worth the constant threat of bombings, shootings, and oppression by the Taliban.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Tempting by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      well the local newspaper is as good as the local tribal leader lets it to be.

      in other words it's pure shit. that's why getting them online matters. that's why getting everyone online matters.

      because that's the a way to get them out of their highly localized dictatorship dystopias. now their life is just what the local guy with most guns and dope for his gunmen wants it to be(and unfortunately those guys aren't very industrious - and making things better for their community would make them have less power...).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Tempting by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well the local newspaper is as good as the local tribal leader lets it to be.

      This is true. Whether the local tribal leader is named Jamaludin Badr or Rupert Murdoch.

    3. Re:Tempting by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whether the local tribal leader is named Jamaludin Badr or Rupert Murdoch.

      Except Ropert Murdoch has no means to compel you to stay away from competing publishers — neither by banning the competitors nor by prohibiting you to buy their wares.

      And that is the key difference between a government-provided service (whether it is news, education, health care, food, shelter, or entertainment) and a privately-provided one.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Tempting by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Indeed, but the private media is more interested in twerking than doing that. The dailymail which has admitted to making up stories is now the most visited internet site for news. Do you expect them to be able to watch the other news sources, if they can't even be expected to only report things that actually happened?

    5. Re:Tempting by mi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People want made up news?

      People want entertainment. "Made up news" certainly fits. Michael Moore's "documentaries" were anything but, for another example. Though his international awards were in the "fiction" categories, he got rave reviews — and millions of viewers — anyway.

      Why not just publish fiction as fiction?

      They seem to be doing fine whatever label you put on them.

      Are you even reading what you are typing?

      I wish, you did — and concentrated on the point I'm making, which is, once again, that government ought not to provide non-governmental services. Never. Not even when the non-governmental providers are personally unpleasant and unscrupulous.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    6. Re:Tempting by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      MSNBC/ABC/NBC/CBS/Fox/NPR still has viewers/listeners; so yes people want made up news.

      Most people don't want their bubble burst. Political affiliation doesn't matter.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  2. Prime Directive by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure there are a lot of issues to fix first. But maybe many there are not ready for *all* the stuff on the net just yet..

    1. Re:Prime Directive by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, after 25 years of using the internet ... some days I'm not sure I'm ready for all of it.

      There's some strange stuff out there.

      Citation needed... And maybe some example links.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:Prime Directive by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Yes, yes it is. :-P

      Though, I'm sure if you're really jonesing you can probably track it down with Google.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Oh the humanity! by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Posting a status update on Twitter is a foreign concept

    (silently wipes a tear away from his eye)

    Also, twitter being an American company, is foreign to damn near ALL countries. As a concept, it's still weird to most Americans even.

    1. Re:Oh the humanity! by gman003 · · Score: 2

      They're life depends on people knowing they exist and lying to them.

      Man, that sentence was easy to mis-parse. I read it as:
      Their life depends on people knowing they exist and knowing that they are lying to them
      not what you probably intended:
      Their life depends on people knowing they exist, and on lying to the people.

  4. Get off my lawn! by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Imagine living in a country where only 3.5 percent of the population use the Internet.

    That's not hard for anyone who is old enough to remember the 1980s. The internet as we know it today is a pretty recent development for most of the population. Before 1990 or so pretty much no one outside of academia had internet access.

  5. Re:ORLY? by arth1 · · Score: 2

    I don't use facebook, and posting a status update on Twitter is certainly a foreign concept to me too.
    If that's what people think of as Internet, things have gone from bad to worse. If the trend continues, I imagine that taking a bus ride in the future means people randomly standing up and announcing things like "Fluffy had her ear wax removed" and "I bought new shoes". And the rest will applaud and pat their backs.

  6. Re:Priorities? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a country, where people are dying like flies from all sorts of preventable causes, and where illiteracy, ignorance and fanaticism are rife, will they REALLY welcome this?

    I thought we did?
    Oh, you're not talking about the US?

  7. How to end all terrorism by Flounder · · Score: 2

    Introduce an entire country to cat pics on Reddit.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    1. Re:How to end all terrorism by benjfowler · · Score: 2

      Or /b/. That'd be hilarious.

  8. Nice by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Glad to see people are focusing on the important issues... Yes after 12 years of non stop war, I'm sure facebook is a huge priority and twitter will stop all the violence.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Nice by AJH16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Giving people the ability to connect to world and understand people from other parts of it is key to peace just about anywhere? When you understand that people are people everywhere, it's far more difficult to get the general populace revved up against some great enemy. People fear the unknown and in the absence of contrary evidence, anything can be said. Now granted, it may have a more limited impact since the Internet itself is perceived as Western, but having people be able to communicate more freely is rarely a bad thing when it comes to trying to prevent popular support for attacking others.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    2. Re:Nice by AJH16 · · Score: 2

      Also, don't get me wrong, I still think war will exist. Governments will do what is in their interest to get power and wealth, but they will do it more against the will of informed people. Just look at the number of wars that America has been involved in that had little to no popular support. It also won't stop some people from being insurrectionists, but removing the fear of unknown and the ability to spread uncheckable propaganda is certainly a significant benefit in limiting it.

      --
      AJ Henderson
  9. God help them. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

    "Imagine living in a country where only 3.5 percent of the population use the Internet. When you ask a neighbor about Facebook, they give you a confused look. Posting a status update on Twitter is a foreign concept, and most citizens still rely on printed newspapers and radio reports." ... And life is good.

    Seriously, if bringing the internet to Afghanistan requires telling people about how hard life must be without twitter or facebook then you fail. The internet is more about breaking borders and giving people access to information they otherwise could not get locally. Not endless self serving and attention whoring status updates.

  10. Junis emailed to say hello by LNO · · Score: 2

    Those of us who have been here for twelve years have fond memories of JonKatz posting about Junis, who hid his "ancient Commodore" (one of four in the village) under the boards of a chicken coop. And of course he was obsessed with Linux, mesmerized by open source and Slashdot, and all of that was totally plausible.

    Shine on, Junis and the Slashdot of yesteryear. Shine on.

  11. Re:Getting Online requires power ... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    The internet can tell you how to grow food or clean water. It can also help you find like minded individuals so you can stand up to those who want to shoot you in the face.

    That sort of post is the utter ignorance that might be why some groups want to blow us up.

  12. Re:Priorities? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    In a country, where people are dying like flies from all sorts of preventable causes, and where illiteracy, ignorance and fanaticism are rife, will they REALLY welcome this?

    A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. And that's all they've got right now, because they were seized by a theocracy and went from the center of learning and knowledge to... well, take a look.

    Oh -- and pearls before swine, and all that.

    You can at least water the horses that will drink.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Are the Afhans better at math? by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    1.5M / 30M is 5%, not 3.5%. This is not a difficult calculation people.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  14. Message from Kabul by isorox · · Score: 2

    From 12 years ago
    http://www.tech.slashdot.org/story/01/11/17/204207/Message-from-Kabul

    An open information society is inevitable. I was a little surprised last week to receive a forwarded e-mail from Junis, who lives in a small town 35 miles southwest of Kabul. This weekend, a movie theater and video store opened up again in Kabul (rentingIndependence Day), Afghan TV cranked up, and so did the Net. Americans understand all too well that our techno-driven culture produces wonders and dangers, but it's one of the most popular social and political forces in the world. Passion for pop culture relentlessly undermined repressive governments like Poland, East Germany and the former Soviet Union. The world, it turns out, really is porous now. Technology and information will squeeze through every closed nook and crevice. The Taliban never made a dent in the attachment this Afghan programmer and his friends had for it.
    When his message came, the Taliban had just fled, Northern Alliance soldiers had taken over his village, and everybody rushed to barbers to cut off their beards and to nearby holes and hiding spots to dig up their Walkmen, VCRs, TVs, CD players, and -- in Junis's case -- his ancient Commodore, one of four in the village. Cafes had popped up all over, with impromptu dances and parties everywhere.

    Junis's e-mail -- routed to Kabul, then Islamabad, then London -- was a reminder that there are civil liberties, and then there are civil liberties. Computers had been banned under penalty of death by the Taliban (except for the Taliban themselves), along with music and TV. Junis, a computer geek obsessed with Linux, had first e-mailed me years ago while I was writing for Hotwired. He was genial and obsessed with American culture. He loved martial arts movies, anything to do with Star Wars, and rap. He was perhaps the Taliban's prime kind of target. (Now he's furiously trying to download movies he's missed and is mesmerized by open source and Slashdot.)

    "I could still see the dust of the pick-up trucks carrying the Taliban out of my village," he wrote, "and some friends and I went and dug up the boards of a chicken coop where I had hid the computer. They might have beaten or killed us if they'd found it. It was forbidden, although they used computers all of the time." He claims American commandos are skulking around dressed as Northern Alliance tribesmen.

    Junis describes life under the Taliban as brutal, terrifying and profoundly boring. What the people in his town -- especially the kids -- missed most was music, posters of Indian and American movie stars (he'd kept his own decaying poster of Madonna), and American TV. Junis missed the fast-changing Web and sees, he says, that he has fallen "forever behind," and that programming is more complex than ever. But at least "Baywatch," which everyone in his town acutely missed, is back, and there's already a lot of talk about "Survivor." Junis predicts "Temptation Island" will be the number one show in Afghanistan within a month.

    If the world needed another demonstration of America's most powerful weapon -- not bombs or special forces but pop culture -- it got it again this week. People all over the planet fuss about whether this healthy and democratic or corrupting and dehumanizing, but people's love for American techno-toys, TV shows, music and movies is breathaking. Watching TV pictures of tribesman on horseback, it's easy to forget that technology reached deep into this culture as well. Junis says phone service around Kabul remains spotty, but reporters, U.N. workers and foreign soldiers are wiring up. He's already made his way to some sex sites, and wishes he had a printer.

    There are many computers in Afghanistan, Junis said, many in clusters in cities like Kabul and Kandahar (news reports have frequently mentioned that Bin-Laden's organization used both e-mail and encrypted files to communicate). Computer geeks are already hooking up with one anot