Slashdot Mirror


Google Tackles Health

Google has announced the formation of a new company called Calico, which aims to promote health and fight aging. Larry Page said, "That’s a lot different from what Google does today. And you’re right. But as we explained in our first letter to shareholders, there’s tremendous potential for technology more generally to improve people’s lives. So don’t be surprised if we invest in projects that seem strange or speculative compared with our existing Internet businesses." He expanded upon this in an interview with Time: "I'm not proposing that we spend all of our money on those kinds of speculative things. But we should be spending a commensurate amount with what normal types of companies spend on research and development, and spend it on things that are a little more long-term and a little more ambitious than people normally would. More like moon shots." The new company's CEO will be Arthur Levinson, who is currently the chairman of Apple and biotech company Genentech. Apple CEO Tim Cook said, "For too many of our friends and family, life has been cut short or the quality of their life is too often lacking. Art is one of the crazy ones who thinks it doesn't have to be this way."

12 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. They care..... sure.... by GT66 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    HIPAA is getting in Google's way. They can't just "take" people's health information the same as they do general user data. So, in order to acquire what migh actually be considered "private" data, they have chosen to be a health care provider which then gives them direct access to that normally off limits data.

    1. Re:They care..... sure.... by geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You think they don't already have health data on people? How many times did you google herpes this year? Did you email your parents/kids telling them about your shingles, bad knees, bad eyesite?

      If other people over the age of 50-60 are anything like my parents and parents in law, virtually every conversation revolves around their new ailments. Google has a crap ton of this info in their systems already and are fully prepared to start spamming the latest Cialis ads at every that's every used the word "dick" in an email.

    2. Re:They care..... sure.... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they can make me immortal by watching ads, I'd gladly watch ads.

      Well, the ads will make your life SEEM longer.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  2. This is interesting by Andrio · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish they were more specific though. What is this company going to do? Drugs? Medical devices?

    Overall, I like the thought of a major IT company trying its hand in healthcare. For some reason it seems promising.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:This is interesting by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      Overall, I like the thought of a major IT company trying its hand in healthcare. For some reason it seems promising.

      It seems promising to me too. Promising in a similar way to a major interior design firm trying its hand at building nuclear reactors.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:This is interesting by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

      1. google streetview cars will get caught stealing the password for grandma's pacemaker.
      2. google brainslug implant. back yourself up to the the cloud!
      3. google proctological exams -- taking privacy invasion to the next level.
      4. you know that 17.9% GDP the US spends inefficiently on healthcare? the good news, google's gonna streamline that to only 9.7%, the bad news, they're taking 1% of the total for their effort.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  3. how about fighting poverty by spune · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1/5 children in America live in poverty. 2/5 lack adequate nutrition. But let's instead focus on improving the quality of life and longevity of the wealthy!

    1. Re:how about fighting poverty by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you mean a War against the Poor, aka the War on Drugs. A war on poverty would include things like access to healthcare, or equalizing education funds for schools, or job training, or any attempt to make folks other than entertainers famous.

    2. Re:how about fighting poverty by Andrio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fighting poverty would require such things like raising the minimum wage to something you can live off of (this just failed to happen in DC, for people employed by major retailers like Walmart), putting a cap on interest rates by credit cards/loans, increasing education spending, etc.

      All these things are impossible to do by anyone as long as companies are allowed to buy what they want from politicians.

      --
      The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    3. Re:how about fighting poverty by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So explain why increasing the minimum wage actually does help the economy?

      Surprise surprise giving money to those who will spend it rather than sit on it helps the economy and the poor. Labor costs in stores is not the primary cost. You could raise the wage to $15/hour and the price of a bigmac to produce would go up a few cents.

    4. Re:how about fighting poverty by geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, it sounds like Cook is talking about Jobs. Boo Hoo... He was a rich (dick) who died relatively young.

      Regardless of whether Jobs was a dick, he certainly was rich. He didn't die because of a lack of health care, he died because he was fucking stupid and didn't listen to his doctors, and pursued homeopathic bullshit remedies for an aggressive pancreatic cancer.

      Jobs would likely be here today running Apple had he not been a fucking idiot hippie with a grudge against modern medicine. In Jobs case, natural selection was not his friend.

  4. This is not about you and me. by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not about you and me and our health data, it's about some billionaires who (understandably) don't want to see what happened to Steve Jobs happen to them.

    You can sit around and say this is Evil and whatnot, but honestly would any of us here behave any differently if we were in their position?

    Note that the president of the new company Calico is Art Levinson, who is currently also Chairman of Genentech and *Apple* so there's a direct Steve Jobs link here and even a quote in the press release from Tim Cook:

    Tim Cook, Chief Executive Officer of Apple, said: “For too many of our friends and family, life has been cut short or the quality of their life is too often lacking. Art is one of the crazy ones who thinks it doesn't have to be this way. There is no one better suited to lead this mission and I am excited to see the results.”

    So this is all very science-fiction (both from a technology *and* a social point of view) and it will be fascinating to watch.

    From a Science point of view this is really interesting because at the moment there are relatively few sources of funding for basic life-extension research, since much research money comes from the government, and making people live longer is no more politically acceptable than talking about population control. So if you're a fan of applied biological research and specifically life-extension technologies then you should be pretty excited by Google's move here.

    Interesting times.

    G.

    P.S. I for one welcome our new genetically enhanced immortal geek overlords.