Slashdot Mirror


Utility Sets IT Department On Path To Self-destruction

dcblogs writes "Northeast Utilities has told IT employees that it is considering outsourcing IT work to India-based offshore firms, putting as many as 400 IT jobs at risk. The company is saying a final decision has not been made. But Conn. State Rep. and House Majority Leader Joe Aresimowicz, who is trying to prevent or limit the outsourcing move, says it may be a done deal. NU may be prompting its best IT employees to head to the exits. It also creates IT security risks from upset workers. The heads-up to employees in advance of a firm plan is 'kind of mind mindbogglingly stupid,' said David Lewis, who heads a Connecticut-based human resources consulting firm OperationsInc, especially 'since this is IT of all places.' The utility's move makes sense, however, if is it trying to encourage attrition to reduce severance costs." Because it's worked so well for others in the past.

10 of 478 comments (clear)

  1. Just a moment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just finishing my last trojans and timebombs...now they can fire me.

    1. Re:Just a moment! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just finishing my last trojans and timebombs...now they can fire me.

      Just outsource your mayhem coding, it's cheaper and quicker.

  2. Advance warning may be the best idea by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an IT professional, what angers me is mostly management lying and claiming everything's hunky-dory and then blindsiding me with layoffs. When they do it even once, it convinces me that I can't trust them ever again. That's not a problem if I'm one of the ones being shown the door, but companies rarely lay off everybody in a single pass and this creates if anything even worse trust issues with those who're still working. At the very least this behavior will turn me from someone who considers it only professional to give as much notice as possible if I decide to go elsewhere into someone who a) doesn't feel obligated to give any more notice than legally required since the company's shown that's what they'll do and b) is more likely to start looking before he gets caught in the next round of layoffs. Whereas if the heads-up is given, I'm less likely to worry and be looking to jump ship because I know I'll have advance warning next round too.

    That no-advance-warning is only a good idea if you can't trust your IT people in the first place. And if you can't trust them, why are you trusting them to run your IT department?

    1. Re:Advance warning may be the best idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here are the facts Todd.

      1: Northeast utilities is a regulated power company, outsourcing anything but the "build it there, use it here" shit (Transformers, regulators, software, hardware, etc) WILL get you in SERIOUS Shit with your local government 5,000 ways from Sunday not just from the IT Security standpoint but also from the downtime-is-not-acceptable standpoint.

      2: A 10k man company with 400 IT Staff probably means they aren't secure anyway because they haven't updated shit in years. 1:25 is seriously out of what IT to Employee ratio and IMO, they deserve to be replaced if they are that lazy. 1:50 to 1:100 is much more reasonable.

      3: Outsourcing doesn't work; nobody is ever happy with the results, which are often catastrophic.

      4: This stinks of control fraud. The moment management begins acting like they are committing control fraud, leave.

      Fraud starts with big companies undergoing mergers and acquisitions; execs and investors get payoffs as the bag is passed from sucker to sucker. Execs receive multimillion dollar golden parachutes and leave while bringing in bright shiny new people to take their place (the suckers) who try the same game over and over; the last set of managers are the bag-holders, and they don't get to leave so easily. Money is somehow lost in bad deals, or outright fraud (we bought $1,000 hammers, oops).

      Ultimately the objective is to asset strip the company and the people within the company by diverting revenue to executive and investor payouts. Asset stripping people means they reduce your pay, remove your job title, let other people go and see if you can do what they did (we made them redundant), and so on. Properly operating companies don't play games like this; they do not hire unless they have to, they solve problems permanently where they can, and they motivate employee's with revenue (stock options, 401k, no hocus-pocus ponzi shit either, real cash externally held from the organization) because they know "thank you" has always gone as far as "fuck you" and paying peanuts means you get peanuts in return. If "The economy" was really an issue, workloads would go down and then they'd get rid of people in the appropriate departments.

      This manifests as I don't care disease which is the result of plain burnout. The rot shows up as employee's not giving a shit and getting away with it (they are not paid enough to care or are not motivated to care, plus their boss is a sucker and just plain stupid). Money gets flushed down the toilet. When burnout starts to show up, and outrageous waste begins to show up (start job searching, be VERY particular).

      Once you see the "we need you to do the job of 3 people" crap start, get your foot out of the door. When you leave, let them, their boss, and their bosses boss (right up the chain to the exec) know in no uncertain terms the reason and that there are no excuses.

      Truth is with Northeast, The good ones left a long, long, long time ago.

  3. Executive pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Note that due to the various interlockings of the various utilities operated by Northeast Utilities, it is next to impossible to know how much people like Bill Quinlan are pulling out of the company, but according to one report, the executives at CL&P (connecuit light & power) get paid 11.2 million. Replacing 400 IT jobs with a contract to India will probably save less than the executive salaries, it is good to be at the top in a modern american company. Bill is a freaking attorney, pulling out about $4 million per year from the rate payers for making such hard nosed decisions as putting 400 americans out of work. Nice guy!

  4. Re:Why would you even? by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it's that in house IT people constantly frustrate them by telling them why the stupid shit they want to do wont work. The foreign center will simply go "Okay, if that's what you want." This is usually why outsourcing IT doesn't work. Someone in house wants the company to survive because he's invested a decade or so of his life to it while the foreign unit simply works as a contractor and has little interest in the firm he services except to collect the fee.

  5. part of the formula by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There really is a reason why companies make the announcement ahead of time before outsourcing. Really, there is. It's part of the formula. The outsourcing company sells the patsy... client, sorry. Sells the client on the idea that the client tells their employees that they're planning to outsource, so that the employees can then be directed to spend their remaining time in documenting their jobs well enough that an untrained person in a third world country could do the job.

    The outsourcing company will insist on this, and the sap, ur... client for God only knows what reason will think this will actually work, and the employees will go "sure, yeah, that's what I'm doing with my remaining time here. Sure. Not spending my entire shift looking for a job in a down economy. No sirree. My job doesn't take any original thought, creativity, or diagnostic skills, it's just a lot of button pushing and answering questions. Here, let me print out ... say ... everything in My Documents. That should stack up real nice."

    ...so all the regular employees exit carrying their sad cardboard boxes, cutover occurs, and it's a disaster.

    ...and the outsourcing company says, it's all the abused spouse's... there I go again! Sorry... it's all the client's fault, for not documenting their processes well enough. And for some reason the client will BELIEVE THIS ALSO. So the outsourcing company will say, we can't do this job as originally bid, it'll require many more 3rd and 4th level people (IE, people with actual skills and experience) and will cost more. A lot more.

    Five years later, the outsourcing company will assure the chump... what's wrong with this spell checker? CLIENT. The client, that the break-even point is just around the corner, really it is, and will volunteer to help sell this concept to the board. Meanwhile, the victim's argh... client's business has suffered, it's harder to do even the smallest office task, change in any reasonable amount of time is impossible, and employees are saying things like "for God's sake, please don't make me call the helpdesk".

    And this will be called Progress.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  6. Re:Why would you even? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    royally screwed - and not in the good way

    So Elizabeth, not Kate?


    Queue the Brits w/ mod points ...

  7. Re:Middleman by bmo · · Score: 5, Funny

    >>Hardware from China and software from India.
    >MBA's from the US
    >Judges from Italy
    >Maple Syrup from Canada

    CHANTING CHORUS: Oil from Canada! Gold from Mexico! Geese from their neighbor's back yard! Boom, boom! Corn from the Indians! Tobacco from the Indians! Dakota from the Indians! New Jersey from the Indians! New Hampshire from the Indians! New England from the Indians! New Delhi from the Indians! ...
    BABE: Indonesia for the Indonesians!
    SOUND: Cannon shot.
    JOE: Yes, and Veteran's Day ...
    DC: But we couldn't do it alone!
    SOUND: Morse Code sending under.
    JOE: No! We needed the Hope, the Faith, the Prayers, the Fears ...
    DC: The Sweat, the Pain, the Boils, the Tears!
    JOE: The Broken Bones!
    DC: The Broken Homes!
    JOE: The Total Degradation of ...
    BABE: Who?
    EDDIE: You! The Little Guy!

    --
    BMO

    LURLENE: Where are you from?
    BABE: Nairobi, Ma'm. Isn't everybody?

  8. those of us who know by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here are the problems outsourcing to India in particular incurs, as those of us who have seen it done again and again since the early 90s know:

    1. data *will* be stolen and sold for spamming and marketing and data mining
    2. no way to ascertain true credentials or abilities of any person, paper diploma/cert mills are rampant
    3. no real legal venue for theft, non-performance, copyright and patent violation, shoddy product or workmanship
    4. any disputes will immediately trigger the cultural response of obstructionism, picayune arbitration, and malicious compliance
    5. supposed "experts" regurgitate "white paper" knowledge but have no experience or ability in practical application
    6. if any project gets done at all, it will be at three times the projected duration with two times the people.

    In short, those who outsource to India deserve what they get. And what they will get is expensive failure.