Slashdot Mirror


Car Dealers Complain To DMV About Tesla's Website

cartechboy writes "State and national car dealer groups have been battling Tesla Motors for years, trying to stop them from selling its electric cars directly to buyers. Most of the time, the dealers work behind the scenes to change state laws and and force Tesla to conduct its sales through 'independently-owned third parties' which are... well, car dealers. But in California, Tesla's operations are legal, so that tactic won't work. So dealers there are taking an interesting new tack — complaining to the DMV about Tesla's website."

24 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. Sour Grapes by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The dealers have a few good points, but EVERYONE knows this is just sour grapes because the dealerships can't fleece potential buyers out of some more money off the top.

    Fucking scum.

    1. Re:Sour Grapes by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah.. I am personally rather happy to see something finally taking a crack at their pattern. I hate hate HATE dealer and have worked hard over the years to never have to deal with one. The idea that they write laws forcing themselves as the only business options really annoys me.

    2. Re:Sour Grapes by Redmancometh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Forcing someone to use a middle man by law is pants-on-head retarded. If your model can't compete you're going to lose. This sounds an awful lot like RIAA/MPAA crap.

      It's not like tesla is going to impact their bottom line heavily - hybrids and electrics are disliked by a lot of people. Not to mention most people don't have that kind of money to drop on a car.

      This is just ridiculous. I hate people that bitch about "the corporations" at every possible chance, but this is almost certainly a result of our corporate overlords.
      So these dealers are entitled BY LAW to make money off someone's product? And you wonder why conservatives bitch about market regulation (even if they do hypocritically regulate the market anyways) well here's why. Regulation is good, but this isn't regulation this is bribery of our elected officials.

      I would give so much to be able to catch these corrupt fucks in the act of accepting a bribe.

  2. how amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Telsa's claims might be misleading, but if you want a pathological lying sack of shit, look no further than your local car dealer.

    1. Re:how amusing by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tesla's claims ARE misleading.

      They need to be clear about your out-of-pocket costs - your actual payment to Tesla's finance company.

      ALSO, dealerships exist only to fuck customers out of useless middleman money by skimming off the top and providing overpriced service.

      If you actually buy the car, the payment is quite clear on the paperwork... But really, If someone buying a $70,000 car can't float the $7500 tax refund until next year when he gets it back from taxes, then he shouldn't be buying a $70,000 car.

    2. Re:how amusing by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, however.... dealerships aren't particularly up front about that information either. You can calculate it yourself easily enough... but the figure that they advertise cars for is in my experience substantially less than what you'll actually end up forking out after all is said and done.

  3. let's all shed a tear for car dealers by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    there's a reason why they call it disruptive technology, scumbags

    we don't need you

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  4. no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure car dealers will have no troubles rallying massive grassroots support to put a stop to this menace to a cherished American institution.

    1. Re:no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dealers dont get stuck with anything. The cars on the dealer lot are not paid for. If the dealer goes out of business the manufacterer eats it all. The cars are financed to the dealer through a credit agency owned by the manufacterer on a no money down, no interest, net 45 day till sale arrangement.

  5. Free Enterprise! by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ain't free enterprise great in America? You can do anything, as long as you cut the vested interests in for a piece of the action. Thankfully though we're not a bunch of economically ignorant Neanderthals that would do something stupid like put a nickel tariff on a pair of socks. That would be interfering in commerce!

    1. Re:Free Enterprise! by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "the" cause huh?

      Sorry, but such a complex historical event can not be simplified to a single 'cause'. Then again, your entire argument reeks of simplification. A good tax strategy requires careful balancing of multiple types since they ALL have consequences. Tarrifs benefit some segments and hurt others, same with personal income, sales, property, license, and pretty much any other tax type. All of them try to take a cut of economic movement, but if you cut too deeply into one type or another it just moves elsewhere or breaks down.

  6. I have a Tesla S by technical_maven · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is a stupendous car, the ordering and delivery process was a dream, and the customer support after the sale has been flawless. The other dealers can simply go pound sand! Rather than bitching, try doing everything right like Tesla!

  7. Ford Vs Musk by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Henry Ford fought the cartel of car manufacturers called American Motor Manufacturers Association which claimed patent rights to the automobile and demanded royalty payment for all car makers. Ford defied them, fought them all the way to the Supreme Court and won back in 1900s. Hope Musk fights the dealers, their cartels and their political shenanigans and win. As soon as I can afford it, I will buy a Tesla.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Ford Vs Musk by dk20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to troll, but i wonder what would happen in the "IP" era of the US economy? If Ford tried this today would he still win or would the "patent holders"?

  8. You know it's the future... by wjcofkc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...when companies are fighting it.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  9. Dealers Have Much Worse Ads! by Webcommando · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the fine article:

    Tesla fails to provide required information and shatters the notion of comparison finance shopping by including the potential availability of incentives, gas savings, and tax savings into final payment quotes for prospective customers.

    So the beef is that Tesla isn't being clear about everything and that upsets the dealers. hmm..

    In my local paper, the dealers have ads in every Sunday that advertise a low price. As it was a few weeks ago, I was looking to buy a minivan for the family (I'm not completely domesticate, I still have my convertible). Great price of $22k for a Town and Country...pretty amazing actually. Way at the bottom of the ad were the caveats--includes first car buyer discount, veteran discount, bonus trade-in amount, etc.

    Looking at the discounts there was no way you could be eligible for all of them at the same time. In my case, none of them. Yeah, those Tesla guys are devious and misleading.

    --
    I love the sound of distortion in the morning -- webcommando
  10. Those poor car dealers by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just trying to make an honest livi---

    wait

  11. CNCDA - Pure as Driven Snow by sk999 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is really shameful that Tesla is misleading customers with deceptive advertising about its electric cars. Here is a part of the complaint:

    "... the Association says that purchase prices on Tesla's website routinely include a $7,500 federal TAX CREDIT, despite the fact that the Congressional Budget Office states that only 20 percent of shoppers qualify for the alternative vehicle credit."

    None of the members of the California New Car Dealer's Association would ever stoop so low. Especially GENERAL MOTORS dealers. Especially since, according to this report: http://cncda.org/resources/10-20-08_CNCDA_Ltr-GMAC_CEO_Alvaro_deMolina.pdf GENERAL MOTORS dealers represent over 25% of CDCDA's members. Surely none of them would ...

    Oh wait.

    http://www.chevrolet.com/volt-electric-car.html

    "Chevrolet 2014 Volt"
    "Net price shown includes the FULL $7,500 TAX CREDIT"

    Never mind, move along, nothing to see.

  12. Re:Missing Point by Shompol · · Score: 5, Informative

    the fuel costs must include the battery wear cost

    That would fall under normal wear and tear, not fuel costs. And before you argue that battery is a costly component that gasoline cars lack: it is more than offset by much simplier car design with fewer moving parts. In fact, what I heard was that the dealers do not want Tesla's business because they would lose out on those fat maintenance cash flows.

  13. Dear US car dealerships... by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You guys used to serve a valuable purpose. Yes, you've always screwed us as hard as you could get away with, but hey, can't fault you for following the American Way to the American Dream.

    But now? Congratulations, the internet has made you nothing more than the place I go to test drive your products before I let the nearest 50 of you bid against each other for my next buy (and don't think I won't buy from the other side of the country if someone there has a good enough sale going on to cover the cost of shipping the damned thing to me).

    You had a good run. Congratulations. Now cash out before you run out of cash. Simple as that.

    Please, go down gracefully. Don't let this turn into yet another "when you can't compete, legislate" disaster. That just never goes well for the "legacy" side of the battle.

  14. Re:Missing Point by turkeyfish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bingo. You've hit the nail on the head. Dealerships make most their money in repairs, not in selling cars. Over the life of a car, the 5-20% profit they make on the sale is a small fraction of what they can make on repairs and maintenance.

    If Telsa has the audacity to create a product that requires significantly less repairs, it puts dealerships at a competitive disadvantage, which is exactly where they should be in a truly free and open market.

    Many in the fossil fuels business like to downplay the savings gained from small fuel costs for battery technology, but they don't want to address the larger costs associated with maintenance issues inherent in internal combustion technology because they know it makes electric car technology even more attractive financially.

  15. Re:Tax Credit? by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

    The maximum tax credit is $7,500.00, but it adjusts on a sliding scale inversely proportional to your gross taxable earnings. In reality, anyone who can afford a $70,000.00 car will get a significantly smaller credit, like $1,500.00 or less.

    This isn't true. The tax credit is a pure credit, no sliding scale based on income. It's not a refundable credit, meaning that if your net federal income tax liability is less than $7500 then you'll only get a credit equal to the amount of your liability, but that's unlikely to be a problem for anyone who is buying a $70K car.

    There is a phase-out of the credit that begins to kick in once a manufacturer has sold at least 200,000 of the qualifying model, and the amount of the credit depends on vehicle battery capacity ($2500 for 5 kWh of capacity, plus $417 for each additional kWh, up to $7500), but the Tesla qualifies for the full amount, and Tesla hasn't yet sold 200K cars, so neither of those are an issue.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  16. Re:Missing Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an owner of a Tesla, I must correct you. Maintenance costs are FAR lower than in my old BMW. I've driven it for almost a year now, and spent 10x overall than I did with a BMW or Mercedes. Do you forget that gas powered luxury cars have all those same features that require just as much (if not more) maintenance than an electric luxury car does? And no more $5-6 a gallon premium gasoline! The savings are astronomical. I know this from experience.

  17. Re:Missing Point by drkim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While true if you factor in the cost of the wear on the battery per km driven then cost of an electric car's fuel is actually far higher than a petrol car.

    Interesting point - but wouldn't that mean that petrol car dealers should be adding the costs of, "carburetor wear and tear; carburetor cleaning; air filter replacement; gas tank wear and tear; etc." to their fuel costs; all those costs that electric cars don't incur.