Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Reportedly Seeks To Put Windows Phone On Android Devices

quantr draws your attention to a Bloomberg report that Microsoft has reached out to HTC to see if the company would be interested in adding Windows as a second OS to its Android handsets. From the Bloomberg story: "Its willingness to add Windows as a second operating system underscores the lengths to which Microsoft will go to get manufacturers to carry its software. HTC, the first company to make both Windows and Android phones, hasn’t unveiled a new Windows-based handset since June and has no current plans to release any more, said one person. Microsoft, with 3.7 percent of the market, is finding it necessary to make concessions after agreeing to acquire Nokia Oyj’s handset unit, which competes with other smartphone makers. [Microsoft operating systems head Terry] Myerson was planning to visit Asia this month and meet with senior executives at Taoyuan, Taiwan-based HTC to discuss his proposal, one of the people said."

48 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Wrong way round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Android on Lumia, that'd be an offering.

    1. Re:Wrong way round. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Funny you should mention that. Guess what Nokia was doing before Elop showed up?

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:Wrong way round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to a few inside accounts, Elop originally wanted to have Android on Nokia phones. When Elop visited Google's HQ, he was rather surprised how hostile Google was to him. Google was willing to give a decent licensing fee if Nokia used the stock Android firmware but were charging hand and leg if Nokia were to add their own features to the device. According to rumors, Google was being complete jerks about it too.

      When we heard about that account, we all assumed that Elop's "burning platform" was Symbian and he was going to put all of his efforts in MeeGo. When he made the Windows Phone announcement, we all knew it was the end of Nokia.

    3. Re:Wrong way round. by larwe · · Score: 2

      I agree in principle, but it's really not that simple. There are carrier approval issues - these have nothing to do with the phone vendor, they're inserted by AT&T et al. Common, obvious example: AT&T doesn't want you sharing your monthly data allotment between devices unless you sign up for a freakin' expensive shared data plan. So they don't want firmware on your phone that will allow tethering without checking to see if your account has the magic "this guy is allowing us to assrape his credit card with shared data fees" flag. Hence, they mandate locking and such. If the vendor wants to sell to AT&T, they insert the crippleware... I doubt any phone vendor will ever again have the leverage Apple created for the iPhone.

    4. Re:Wrong way round. by tibman · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are incredibly misinformed. It costs nothing to put android on a phone (even for a phone manufacturer). The manufacturer has to get a license to put the play store on the device, but that is about compliance. If nokia wanted to do their own thing then they wouldn't have had to spend a penny or ask anyone's permission. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)#Licensing

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    5. Re:Wrong way round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except for this part:

      Even though the software is open-source, device manufacturers cannot use Google's Android trademark unless Google certifies that the device complies with their Compatibility Definition Document (CDD). Devices must also meet this definition to be eligible to license Google's closed-source applications, including Google Play.

      Google doesn't certify your phone if you put in new features it doesn't like. You can make a phone that can run Android apps (like BB10) without paying a dime, but you can't call it an Android Phone unless Google approves of it.

    6. Re:Wrong way round. by larwe · · Score: 2

      That's only technically true. It costs a lot of resource-hours (=money) to port and qualify Android onto a phone platform, and to get it carrier approved. The carrier approval processes are Byzantine and expensive beyond belief.

    7. Re:Wrong way round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Carrier approval is utterly irrelevant except in North America where you have corporations making the laws. Anywhere else people can just buy a phone and use it.

      Now obviously the North American market is a good place because it's full of suckers who will cheerfully pay you $50 per month for two years to buy a $500 phone, but it's not necessary. If you can't recoup the cost of deliberately arcane "Carrier approval" processes from the money those suckers will pay you then you simply don't sell into America.

    8. Re:Wrong way round. by geoskd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Little bit of insider information, most of it is from that Wall Street Journal article from around Jan 2011 talking about the decision. I can't find the article right now and there is a chance they may never have published it online.

      Translate that as: I'm lying out my ass, and will duck any attempt to call me out on it...

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    9. Re:Wrong way round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll only post a tl;dr version of a response here: All of them. North America is the follower in the mobile space, not the leader.

    10. Re:Wrong way round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Europe and Asia. Now what?

    11. Re:Wrong way round. by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      Pretty much what the rest of those guys said. Except for Apple, the mobile phone space (especially smartphones) is not at all US-centric.

      Some of this was definitely because of the carriers. The Galaxy S was rebranded for each major carrier (the Captivate on AT&T, the Fascinate Verizon, the Vibrant on T-Mobile), each one of them having a unique outer shell design rather than just shipping the same damn phone that was in Europe for a year. I think they all *lost* features (FM radio, LED flash, etc) coming to america...

      --
      Bottles.
    12. Re: Wrong way round. by pev · · Score: 2

      Actually you'd be surprised how easy it can be especially in this day and age where most of the IP blocks are largely the same and most are supported. I used to do 50-50 embedded linux and embedded windows work and back when I did a lot of windows I could do a bring up from bare hardware and a linux port to booting into a windows GUI (windows mobile if required) in a day or maybe two if lucky. I'm not even a slight ms fanboy but the embedded windows architecture is quite clever in the way that the HAL abstracts out everything really nicely. There's lots I could bitch about but that aspect was really superb...

      PS No. that's not over-exaggerating and yes I'm available for hire :-D

    13. Re:Wrong way round. by Shompol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nokia used to be such a big player in the mobile market that they did not need to become "yet another Android vendor". They had the know-how, capital, fame, and few billions of loyal customers to either come up with a competing OS (MeeGo) or just fork Android and not give a flying fuck about Google trademark. They even had Nokia-built map and navigation good enough to rival Google's.

    14. Re:Wrong way round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. That's FCC approval.

    15. Re:Wrong way round. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      huh who the f modded this up?

      funny insiders you have.

      now what elop did was say that nokia had looked into android and COULD NOT CUSTOMIZE IT ENOUGH for their needs so they had to partner with MS. seriously. that's what he claimed as one reason. that with android they couldn't differentiate enough so they went with an os that in all practicality can't get any customizations and a phone platform where they could not even choose which soc providers to use!

      now if you don't see the bullshit in that then you're kind of hopeless and I have a bridge to sell for you and an investment opportunity in a potentially multinational ladder business.

      (that is to say that nokia had insiders working for them who on purpose were to find reasons not to use android, including elop. nokia was so dysfunctional at that point though that they would have on purpose looked for reasons not to use android even without elop. but this was back when elop bothered to even keep up a charade about what's going on)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:Wrong way round. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      Europe and Asia. Now what?

      This. As a US citizen, it embarrasses me how uninformed US citizens are about wtf is happening in the rest of the world. Outside the realms of operating systems, the US is a follower in the mobile workd (hardware, ecosystems, marketing, logistics), not a leader.

  2. Will they allow the reverse? by wjh31 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To be able to have the choice of OS on your device is a good thing, maybe you like the S3 but like windows OS. or you like the nokia lumia hardware but prefer andoid. Now its never going to be allowed to happen with iphone/iOS but choice of OS on other devices can only be a good thing

    1. Re:Will they allow the reverse? by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

      choice of OS on other devices can only be a good thing

      BAD OR MISSING NTLDR. CANNOT CALL 911.

      Abort/retry/ignore? _

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  3. This is simple numbers pumping by larwe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft has played games with numbers to pump its supposed Windows market share many many times. For instance, if you're a big corporation and you buy 10,000 machines with Vista installed, but backlevel them to XP, Microsoft counted those as Vista sales. This "dual boot" bullshit is almost certainly the same nonsense. HTC has a bigger market share by itself than all the Windows Phone devices in aggregate (I believe). Anyway, it's the #3 smartphone vendor behind Apple and Samsung. It's also in really dire trouble financially, or at least so the news-sphere seems to indicate. So, they're hurting for cash and might be willing to accept some cash to load Windows on their Android phones as dual boot. Practically nobody will use Windows, but Microsoft will be able to claim those dual boot handset sales as "Windows sales" and fake the numbers to make it look like Win Phone is growing in marketshare.

    1. Re:This is simple numbers pumping by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would be interested. I get real Onenote support and better integration for exchange at work. On the weekends its android time. Metro may suck on a big computer screen but is fine for cell phones.

      The Windows kernel is lighter than linux and snappy too.

    2. Re:This is simple numbers pumping by lexman098 · · Score: 2

      The Windows kernel is lighter than linux and snappy too.

      Linky?

    3. Re:This is simple numbers pumping by Threni · · Score: 2

      > The Windows kernel is lighter than linux and snappy too.

      Smaller? Faster? Giggles... Uh.. I mean "citation needed".

      Actually, smaller's not that important as clearly Linux has a rather successful footprint. Is "snappy" a way of saying "fast, but not faster than linux"? Being smaller but unsuccessful isn't really anything to shout about.

    4. Re:This is simple numbers pumping by Nerdfest · · Score: 3

      How about these days where installing Windows will still kill your Linux boot. You'll either need to repair your boot configuration or install Linux after Windows instead of before. Microsoft does not play well with others, and in general is not to be trusted.

    5. Re:This is simple numbers pumping by idunham · · Score: 2

      If it's NT kernel vs Linux kernel, I can boot Linux in 4 MB--with 3 login shells.
      (I'm serious: I linked busybox statically against musl, configured a pure busybox /, set the login shell to ash, and booted with mem=4096. About 2 MB free once boot was over, IIRC. No swap.)
      Android, on the other hand, has a display manager and a VM to fit in there. "free" on a Gingerbread phone just after boot claims ~ 200M used. That probably includes a bit of bloat, but I don't imagine it booting in much under 128 MB.

  4. Oh, "BeOS" has come back to haunt Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, if only the license terms for Android FORBID dual booting, and allowing the user to make such a choice.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/02/20/be_inc_sues_microsoft/

  5. In other news... by sycodon · · Score: 5, Funny

    IBM has contacted Apple to see if they want to put MVS on the iPhone, complete with a punched card interface.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:In other news... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Without a paper-tape reader, the idea is a non-starter.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:In other news... by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      It'll be the most high-tech method to get your own code running on an iPhone.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They seem to allow them under certain circumstances:
      Spectrum ZX emulator.
      TurboGrafx-16 emulator.
      HP48GX emulator.

  6. Trust Microsoft??? by jonsmirl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My memory is fuzzy on this, but I believe Microsoft took Toshiba to court and made them stop dual booting Linux on their laptops about 20 years ago. At the time Toshiba owned a Linux distribution so they prevented Toshiba from shipping their own code.

    This is the same Microsoft that is extorting everyone over unnamed Android patent infringements.

    Why would you want to work with them? Every company that works with them ends up dead or wounded.

    1. Re:Trust Microsoft??? by larwe · · Score: 2

      You know, I totally forgot about the Microsoft "we own critical Android patents" moneysucking. Lest we forget, Microsoft has (according to external analysis) earned more money from royalties on those patents, as shipped in Android devices, than they have on WinMo licenses. Anyway - the very simplest move Microsoft could make here is to tell all the vendors "make Win Phone a dual boot option, at no cost and the Android patents are free". Presto, massive free expansion of the number of devices with Win Phone installed - of course, it would be negligible expansion of the number of Win Phone /users/, but some marketroid inside Microsoft would make his annual numbers and get his bonus and get promoted.

    2. Re:Trust Microsoft??? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      "Hi mom. Oh, your Android phone is screwing up? Yeah, Google messed this one up. Hey, the best thing to do is to boot into Windows until they get their act together. Just hold down the bottom left key with the two squiggles on it at the same time you're pressing the home button and the power key."

      "Mom? Are you there? Mom?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. From HTC's perspective by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    HTC has had trouble getting traction against Samsung despite offering compelling hardware. Offering a dual-boot phone might give them a competitive advantage with some subset of buyers... although I'm guessing it'd be a fairly small number.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:From HTC's perspective by chowdahhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Collaborating with Microsoft has historically been the kiss of death, however. I just don't see anything helpful coming out of that--there's certainly no consumer interest in WP and any capital injection would be a short term band-aid. HTC needs to narrowly focus their product line, not target every market segment like Samsung, and build brand recognition. Their hardware is good and their software support has greatly improved. They just need their name and logo out there more, and in a way that people associate with smartphones.

    2. Re:From HTC's perspective by Voyager529 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just don't see anything helpful coming out of that-

      For a site dedicated to nerds, there's an utter dearth of imagination...and memory.

      See kids, back in the day, HTC made this little phone called the HD2. It shipped with Windows Mobile 6.5 and was intended to ship with Windows 7, but Microsoft told them "no can do" for the sole reason that it has an inconsistent hardware button configuration with the rest of the Windows Phone 7 handsets. However, because of the intended dual-OS compatibility, HTC released a phone that was impressively consistent and relatively easy to flash. This lead to the development of MAGLDR and CLK, which were alternative bootloaders that enabled users to flash Windows Phone 7 (unofficially, though completely functionally if you can get MS to give you a product key), Android (more versions of Android than any other handset; everything from Froyo to Jellybean and I think some of the earlier versions were available, too), Meego, Ubuntu, FirefoxOS, and proof-of-concept compatibility with WP8 and WinRT. To this day, it has one of the most active communities on XDA, certainly moreso than any other phone that was sold during the same time period.

      When HTC builds a phone to boot a pair of OSes, especially ones as different as Windows Phone and Android, odds are better than ever that HTC will end up shipping a phone that's more mod-friendly than most of the phones that ship with just one OS, even a Nexus. Don't you think that there's something "helpful" about a phone that is sufficiently hackable that it can have its software kept current long past its EOL date according to the carrier? I do.

      While we're at it, I know that hating Microsoft is cool around here and all, and yes, I do walk around with an Android phone because a phone without a user-exposed file system is a dealbreaker for me, but are we seriously going to sit here and say that it's better for Google/Samsung and Apple to each have ~50% of the market rather than having Google/Samsung/HTC, Microsoft/Nokia/HTC, and Apple all having ~33% of the market a piece? I always thought competition was a positive situation, and even if HTC gets screwed over by Microsoft somehow (like they did by not being able to officially software upgrade the HD2), it still means more mod-friendly phones for everyone - something I thought that a group of people who like installing Linux on everything with a processor would appreciate.

    3. Re:From HTC's perspective by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > HTC has had trouble getting traction against Samsung despite offering compelling hardware.

      Interestingly, HTC's plummeting market share coincided almost EXACTLY with their elimination of removable batteries and microSD cards. It's not rocket science. Two years ago, HTC was neck in neck with Samsung. Then, they eliminated microSD and removable batteries, everybody who viewed that as intolerable & used to have a HTC phone bought Samsung phones when it was time for their next upgrade, and HTC went from being "a little behind Samsung" to "WAY behind Samsung".

      Suggestion to HTC: give us a new phone like the Evo3D (but with GSM+LTE capabilities compatible with AT&T and T-Mobile as well) that has microSD and a removable battery (or at least a 6,000mAH battery if it MUST be non-removable) and an unlocked (or trivially-unlockable) bootloader, and watch your market share climb again. I know people (like my brother) who literally paid a small fortune to buy a USED Evo 3D long after it was officially EOL'ed because their original one got destroyed and they liked the 3D features so much. My brother STILL resists buying a new phone, because he doesn't want to give up the 3D camera and display.

    4. Re:From HTC's perspective by sir-gold · · Score: 2

      I have owned a T-Mobile G2 (HTC Desire Z) for the last 3 years, and I would love for HTC to come out with a similar phone with more modern hardware (I have mine rooted, running android 4.2, and its starting to show it's age)

      I don't understand why nobody makes android phones with physical keyboards anymore. I'm ready for a new phone, but I don't want to give up my keyboard

    5. Re:From HTC's perspective by Solandri · · Score: 2

      HTC is the low-hanging fruilt. Both Apple and Microsoft have been throwing their weight around to force HTC into unfavorable agreements. That's why they're having trouble getting traction against Samsung. Microsoft isn't HTC's savior, they're the ones who helped put HTC in the poor market position they're currently in. Microsoft asking HTC to make Windows Phone phones is akin to the bully who steals your lunch money asking you to also do his homework for him.

  8. Let me get this straight by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So instead of OEMS only caring about Windows, designing hardware only tested for Windows, only supporting Windows, signing Windows in the hardware boot device,and even including Windows where someone has to manually go into the bios and install a second bootloader to run Linux has now changed to carriers only caring about linux, designing phones just for linux/Android, only supporting Linux, and even signing linux to run Android on top, now has to listen to an angry MS who feels its soo unfair that no one will even stock their products on the shelf nor care and are begging just for the opportunity to dual boot! ... No cost too as well according to NEOwin!

    Wow. Couldnt happen to a nicer company. It is amazing how fast this happened. Windows CE was gearing up for a monopoly and beating blackberry just a few years ago to. ... well this?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by SEE · · Score: 2

      Apart from in one of Ballmer's wet dreams, when on earth was WinCE (or its descendants) ever en route towards monopoly status?

      In 2004, Windows Mobile (CE) had 11% market share in "smartphones". In 2005, this increased to 17%. In 2006, it moved up to 37% (tied with Blackberry, well ahead of Palm's 17% and Symbian's 9%), and in 2007, it hit 42% (while Blackberry lost share).

      That flattening of the growth of Windows Mobile marketshare in 2007 may have been inevitable . . . but it may have been the iPhone. Nobody in late 2006 should have considered Microsoft taking an absolute majority in 2007 and then grinding down Blackberry into a niche by 2013 particularly unlikely. If the iPhone had flopped as bad as the previous "iPod phone" (the Motorola Rokr E1) . . .

  9. Re:licencing "cost"? by Teun · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://neo900.org/

    Smooth upgrade. Finally!
    The Neo900 project aims to provide a Fremantle (Maemo 5) compatible successor of N900, with faster CPU, more RAM and LTE modem, basing efforts on an already existing, mature and stable free platform - the OpenPhoenux GTA04.
    We'll provide both complete, ready to use devices in N900 case, and motherboard replacements for your current device. Neo900 will also support all operating systems available for GTA04 (QtMoko, SHR, Debian, Replicant, ...)

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  10. trust microsoft == trust the NSA by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you are going to run Windows Phone, you damn well better accept that MS and the NSA will have full access to everything on your phone and will set it to record all your conversations.

    this used to be tinfoil hat area but now it's a probability.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  11. how about them... by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This includes Apple as well.

    I'm trying here...so I'll give you partial credit. You're definitely begging the question, but it is important to acknowledge that other companies make similar mistakes as M$ (though they are not as bad).

    Apple's design flaws are just as annoying as any other design flaw.

    The question is, what about Apple's process allowed them to do right what M$ did wrong?

    As others have pointed out, Apple is the exact opposite of M$: a successful and popular company. There is no debate on that point worth having.

    So what about Apple kept them from screwing up as bad as M$?

    > Was it Steve Job's megolomania combined with good design choices and lucky market conditions? Any CEO can pound their fist and force their way, but just by law of averages, when JOb's did it, it had marginally better results in the end product, perhaps?

    > Is the answer in the engineering department? like where they actually write the software...,did they quietly refuse to do things like Internet Explorer tried to do in the 90s?

    > Lack of the government contracts forcing them to innovate at Apple? See, M$ only exists b/c IBM needed a lackey to put stripped down PC boxes on every government office desk...M$ was the operating system....credit Gates for profiting by leveraging his govt contracts into forcing users to use his product...but...that didnt' really encourage R&D. Apple had to fight to survive

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  12. Whats that I smell? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Desperation, I think.

    The king of "You must sell windows with every device, you may not offer other options" is now begging, with its tail between its legs, to an "other option" on a device.

    "No thanks".

  13. Storage Space by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    The problem with having a dual boot phone is that phones typically have limited storage space. If you want to dual boot a PC with Linux and Windows, you can stick in another hard drive to add a terabyte or two more storage. Phones, on the other hand, only have a small amount of space. My phone (a Droid Bionic) has 16GB of storage. It's a bit old, though. Newer phones come with at least 32GB of storage. Of this, some is allocated for the OS.

    If you want to have two operating systems on the same phone you have two options:

    1) Have the user storage area (for apps, photos, videos, etc) be smaller. Some people will buy your phone because "it runs Windows AND Android" but word will quickly spread about the fact that this means you can't install as many apps or take as many photos as a normal Android only phone (or Windows only phone for that matter).

    2) Add more memory to the phone. This will allow you to compensate for the second operating system, but it will also raise the price of the phone. Users will need to decide whether the increased cost is really worth it.

    Yes, you can use MicroSD cards to increase the space, but that's an added cost to the user. Telling the user that they just bought this more expensive dual-boot phone and now they need to buy another card to get the same user-storage space as that person who bought the cheaper single-OS phone is a losing proposition.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  14. Don't think this is about dual boot by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why would MS have any interest in a dual booting phone? I find it more likely that MS is begging HTC to still make Windows phones and are trying to make this more attractive by suspending demand for the mandatory 17 Windows buttons or whatever they usually demand to certify the hardware.
    That way HTC can use exactly the same hardware for both their Android and Windows version, thereby reducing their development costs.

    MS probably have to sweetening the deal by making their OS free for HTC to use too.

    It is difficult to understand why any phone company would still want to make windows phones now that MS now are competing directly against them with their own large ex-Nokia production line. Yes, for sure, MS is no longer a software only company.

    Nokia already sold their Windows phones with a hefty loss, so now MS either have to raise prices as to not out-compete other Windows phone makers (not going to happen), or compete for market share by dumping prices, thereby out-competing other Windows phone makers like HTC, or dump prices and compensate anyone desperate enough to still make Windows phones.

  15. No way by chr1st1anSoldier · · Score: 2

    As someone who has owned both Windows Phone and Android, bad idea for HTC. Yeah, WP looks cool, but that is about where it stops. I can customize the hell out of my Android, different launchers, different lockers, different dialers, different SMS apps, different search applications, etc. I can make my Android look and act like WP, I can make my Android look and act like iOS, I can make my Android look and act like Ubuntu Touch, I can even install a complete linux distribution inside my Android phone. There really isn't a whole lot you can do on a WP. Change a few tiles around, change their color, but that is about it. The apps suck for WP, I tried looking for a different web browser and you are pretty much stuck with IE or some other browser based off of IE. My work uses google talk/hangouts. I tried searching for that, there were two or three apps that supported this eBuddy and IM+. I don't use social media so the Twitter and Facebook integration in WP is useless to me. Don't want to use Bing as the default search provider? You are going to have to install a custom WP Rom for that. I can get my Android to do everything I want it to do, but I can't get my WP to do anything close.