Slashdot Mirror


Sorm: Russia Intends To Monitor "All Communications" At Sochi Olympics

dryriver writes with this excerpt from The Guardian: "Athletes and spectators attending the Winter Olympics in Sochi in February will face some of the most invasive and systematic spying and surveillance in the history of the Games, documents shared with the Guardian show. Russia's powerful FSB security service plans to ensure that no communication by competitors or spectators goes unmonitored during the event, according to a dossier compiled by a team of Russian investigative journalists looking into preparations for the 2014 Games. The journalists ... found that major amendments have been made to telephone and Wi-Fi networks in the Black Sea resort to ensure extensive and all-permeating monitoring and filtering of all traffic, using Sorm, Russia's system for intercepting phone and internet communications. Ron Deibert, a professor at the University of Toronto and director of Citizen Lab, which co-operated with the Sochi research, describes the Sorm amendments as "Prism on steroids", referring to the programme used by the NSA in the US and revealed to the Guardian by the whistleblower Edward Snowden."

193 comments

  1. Monitoring by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's just what oppressive governments do. They have to monitor everything to stay in power.

    1. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's just what oppressive governments do. They have to monitor everything to stay in power.

      Just like the US of A. Old foe, meet new tyrant. Old foe copies new tyrant. Old foe and new tyrant are now buddies.

    2. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you NSA for revitalizing your enemy and recreating the glory days of the cold war. Old school job security permanently returns.

    3. Re:Monitoring by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >> That's just what oppressive governments do. They have to monitor everything to stay in power.

      > Just like the US of A.

      So if the USA is able to 'monitor everything to stay in power,' why is the government stalemated at the moment? Why does the President have no power? Why, unlike in Russia, are people currently able to publicly oppose their leader with zero consquences?

      Curious Canadian wants to know...

    4. Re:Monitoring by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wonder what Snowden has to say about this? Since The Moscow Times says that Spying Is a Sovereign Right, and a key spokesman for Snowden in Russia is the head of public council for the Federal Security Service (FSB), I would guess not much. Just as well: NSA Is No Match for the FSB

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Monitoring by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's just the theater. The real power never appears on television.

    6. Re:Monitoring by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 2

      You're right. It's in the bureaucracy.

    7. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I wonder why you didn't care about russian human right violations till they granted asylum to Snowden.

    8. Re:Monitoring by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      LOL. You are either trolling, or practically never read what I write.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    9. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, but that is an internal fight between the Democan and Republicrat wings of The Party, no plebs need apply.

    10. Re:Monitoring by obarthelemy · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing the same thing happened at previous olympics, only the gov did not brag about it ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    11. Re:Monitoring by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Actually, no one reads what you write. We can't figure out how your last name is supposed to be pronounced, and move on to post from people with easier pseudonyms. ;^)

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    12. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you post this video?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2mjs_gdMAI

    13. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      London Olympics provided free Wi-Fi for all! (and if you don't value our generousness and try to turn on a private WiFi hotspot we'll find you and ban you). Given what we now know about GCHQ, do you believe they didn't monitor that?

      PS: And as a side note, 1 CCTV camera per every 14 visitors with automatic face ID and all is the other definition of "mass surveillance"

    14. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      President of US has no absolute power over everything, the same is true for Putin. If you think Putin is some absolutist czar and can do whatever he wants, you are watching western propaganda too much. The difference is that right now the two faction that hold power in US are in fight, while in Russia they are mostly playing along. Putin and Obama are figureheads.

      Tell that joke about zero consequences to Snowden or to people from Occupy, to name just two examples. I would grant you that Russia government is more thinly-skinned, but even in Russia you can voice opposition to various degrees, and even in US if you try to mount too effective opposition, you will be whacked hard.

    15. Re:Monitoring by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every government needs to do it, which is the harsh reality that people don't want to accept. We have large swaths of people over here (U.S.) that are so fucked-up-crazy with the religious and ideological bullshit, that they are essentially domestic terrorists. We have a portion of the government holding the country hostage because they don't like a bill that was passed years ago, and are still throwing a hissy fit over it. And worse yet, we have a (very) vocal minority of people that support these actions.

      Any government would be stupid not to monitor anything and everything possible. Society has made its bed, and now we are sleeping in it.

    16. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lizard people bureaucracy.

    17. Re:Monitoring by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    18. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not saying i disagree with what you say but. What if there was no monitoring in this day and age where Muslims kill for religious reasons?

      The problem is it is not just this "AGE", religious nuts have ALWAYS been killing people. Let me amend that "NUTS" have been killing people for ever.
      This is not a NEW problem. Why should we destroy democracy & privacy for the sake of the nuts.

    19. Re:Monitoring by u16084 · · Score: 1

      zero consquences... never to be heard from again....

      --
      -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
    20. Re:Monitoring by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why is the government stalemated at the moment?

      What stalemate? The the one side of the party is bickering with the other one? C'mon, that's the sideshow for when there's nothing important to do. Or rather, when there is a lot of important stuff to be done, but nothing that they actually want to do because doing anything would be against their interest. Don't think of it as a stalemate, think of it as the half time show to keep the spectators entertained while there's nothing really going on that they want to do.

      Why does the President have no power?

      Erh... why should he have any power? You nuts? That muppet is elected by the plebs, why the fuck should he get any real power?

      Why, unlike in Russia, are people currently able to publicly oppose their leader with zero consquences?

      Because we learned that governments are stable as long as people talk, protest, march, complain, make jokes or smear crap on internet boards. It gives them a place to vent their anger at government while not really having any impact on it. Think of it as some way to vent some steam. It's actually the sensible thing to do, not only does it give the people the illusion that they can voice their concerns (well, that's not really an illusion, they can actually do that, the illusion is that anyone gives a shit), it's a way to vent. If you keep the lid on the pot too long and too tightly, the pot won't whistle, it will explode.

      So they let 'em whistle instead. It's maybe annoying, but it doesn't really cause any harm.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At least Russia tells you they're monitoring you in advance. In US, you're monitored 24/7 all year round and you only find out about it through evil "traitors" like Snowden.

    22. Re:Monitoring by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Because at just below the top of the slope the view is different?

      Fascism will come wrapped in a flag and carrying a Bible. ~ Sinclair Lewis 1935

      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -- James Madison

      patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels. - Samuel Johnson

      let me know if any of those seem to describe the current US political climate...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    23. Re:Monitoring by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      1) People are not able to effectively oppose the leaders with zero consequences. There is a big difference between publicly and effectively.
      2) Obama is not the leader. Neither is Boehner or Reid, etc.

    24. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we have heroes like Ted Cruz who are willing to stop at nothing to ensure that liberty is preserved. While Obama makes his Barry-cades around national monuments and even has helicopters holding up curtains to block the viewing of Mount Rushmore, Cruz has shown to stand up to the machine.

      This is the best thing that has happened to the US since Reagan was given office.

    25. Re: Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In post-Soviet Russia, authoritarianism isn't back. It was never permitted to leave...

    26. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin have some "funny old friends" that have some interesting training. So did the Bush presidents.
      Obama is less likely to have the same unofficial network. That is mostly a good thing.

    27. Re:Monitoring by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      That's because we simple mortal humans lack the technology to successfully capture it's image on our primitive "recording devices"

    28. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has obviously nothing to do with the fact that Chechnya is within walking distance from there. Nope, it's all about gay rights.

    29. Re:Monitoring by mexsudo · · Score: 1

      the real "government" is hidden, the "President" is not aware of his impotence. did you read about NSA? Google it

    30. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just what oppressive governments do. They have to monitor everything to stay in power.

      You don't have to monitor anything to put Japanese Americans in concentration camps, for example, or to levy unfair taxes, or you know.. actually be oppressive in a thousand other ways.

      Oppressive governments will do whatever they want against the will of the people, intelligence is not something exclusive to governments who just do whatever the fuck they want.

      Believe it or not, large numbers of people want their governments to be well connected and informed, and don't find personal security issues in that.

    31. Re:Monitoring by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I can tell you exactly what Snowden will have to say about this. The NSA/CIA intends to do exactly the same thing if they can get away with it. Russia's number one priority catching the NSA/CIA at it and exposing them. Yes, NSA is no match for FSB but that is for doing it within the law (far more extensive message interception laws) on the flip side the FSB is no match for NSA which is comes to breaking their own laws. Which is worse, hmmm, that's fucking easy, breaking you own laws because their is absolutely no limit on that and when you are breaking laws, well what the fuck is to stop you from just manufacturing your own evidence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    32. Re:Monitoring by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      We have large swaths of people over here (U.S.) that are so fucked-up-crazy with the religious and ideological bullshit, that they are essentially domestic terrorists.

      and just how are we supposed to defend ourselves when these people that you speak of ARE in the US government!

      I wish I was kidding. but our whackjobs are mostly the ones in power. the occasional foreign terrorist does not post much threat to the western way of life. but our own people in power are systematically destroying the freedom that once made us great! ;(

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    33. Re:Monitoring by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      No, it's market capitalism. They'll sell the data to the NSA and other governments who are willing to pay for it. When Facebook does it, everyone calls it genius.

    34. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. Oppressive government. I guess you haven't been to Russia recently. I have. Russians enjoy a lot more freedoms than you suspect. Sure, Putin has his issues, but they are obviously worried about Chechnya. Just don't piss off the wrong people and you'll be fine.

    35. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, if this was the US you'd go along the lines: "Good, they are taking the terrorist threat seriously. Now they will surely prevent any terrorism." When it's somewhere else it's the big bad government.

    36. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the current President wants it so. The next one might not be so magnanimous.

    37. Re:Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden doesn't have to say anything, the NSA has already said it. They have publicly stated in front of Congress that they want to be able to monitor "all communications" in the US via electronic spying, cameras and hidden microphones.

    38. Re:Monitoring by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously believe there is a tangible difference between the Democrats and the Republicans in matters of any consequence? No matter which party is in power, in any country really, capitalists are the ones really in charge by simple virtue of their power to control so much of the economy and their unparalleled resources to drive legislation and influence the media which they own.

    39. Re:Monitoring by phorm · · Score: 1

      Why, unlike in Russia, are people currently able to publicly oppose their leader with zero consquences?

      Zero consequences to who?

      Occupy wall street... what changed?
      Snowden NSA spying revelations... Clapper lying to the senate... what changed?
      "Collateral Murder" video... what changed?

      There are no consequences because frankly even large, high profile opposition seems to have ZERO effect where it counts.

    40. Re:Monitoring by wwphx · · Score: 1

      You need to read today's XKCD.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  2. SLOP syndrome by benjfowler · · Score: 0, Troll

    Anybody heard of SLOP (Severe Loss of Perspective Syndrome?)

    The techno-libertarian community seemed to get a big dose of it when we saw those leaks from Snowden and friends. All of a sudden, we were the Devil incarnate, despite:

    1) surveillance being subject to judicial and legislative oversight
    2) not being anywhere near as far-reaching as SORM or the Chinese systems, or
    3) anybody being hauled away in the dead of night for offending the sensibilities of anybody in power.

    I suggest that some people need to grow up, and realise that the West is the absolute paragon of virtue compared to what Russia, China and Muslim countries are doing.

    I shudder to think what will happen to the world when the baton of world domination is handed to these despots. I know the techno-libertarian crowd will be celebrating.

    1. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the despots took over the US might have half as many people in prison.
      It's ok because our prisons are nicer.

    2. Re:SLOP syndrome by Ragzouken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "surveillance being subject to judicial and legislative oversight" I guess you missed all the leaks which revealed that oversight is utterly useless?

    3. Re:SLOP syndrome by dmbasso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suggest that some people need to grow up, and realise that the West is the absolute paragon of virtue compared to what Russia, China and Muslim countries are doing.

      I suggest that some people need to wake up, and realise that while the West is currently the absolute paragon of virtue (compared to what Russia, China and Muslim countries are doing) we must not take that condition for granted.

      FTFY.

      I shudder to think what will happen to the world when the baton of world domination is handed to these despots.

      Yep, me too. That's exactly the reason I don't want "the West" to become them.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    4. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it interesting that so many people know how far reaching or how limited, depending on their political beliefs, a secret program is.

    5. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were nicer. Now they are not only secret, but hold people who have no idea why they are there, or for how long.

      Oh, and torture is legal. Insert the world's definition of "torure" here, not the US' one.

    6. Re:SLOP syndrome by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ..but just couple of articles back there's an article of going for foreign soil and shooting guns. with russia you're pretty much free to do anything(few isolated incidents not counting) as long as you stay out of russia(or their oil drilling operations). I'm not aware of any cases of russians even asking extradition of hackers, dissidents or what have you. however usa does that regularly and not only asks other countries to do it - they and their ally have regularly gone abroad to outright kidnap (locally)illegally persons they for some reason or another want out of the picture. that's scary. I can stay out of russia easy and not sweat even if I fly over it.

      I could even plan a hypothetical russian revolution plan without worrying about getting whacked! now if I did the same thing using some cloud service but only for USA instead of russia I would be risking a black ops visit or extradition to usa for threatening security in usa.

      there's plenty of reasons to boycott sochi. but all that was lost already to olympic movement when china had their games. they only care about money and for most athletes making it to olympics is about money too - to keep a "pro" status they have to get there and pro status means having enough sponsorship(private or state) to keep competing on pro level. of course the right thing to do is to not watch the games.

      a big thing about the leaks is that judical and legislative oversight.. is that it isn't. it's closed doors. there's TWO parallel processes - the old one that went through courts and ended up as evidence on regular cases and then there's the mystery NSA-secret court and secret oversight one - but why would there be a need for that ? and I don't know how really much more far reaching you can get than re-routing connections and inserting tagging via js holes to people who you don't know even where they're from. you really shouldn't use russia or china as the benchmarks for freedom! as soon as you do that you're thoroughly fucked!

      And you forgot the biggest difference to russian spying vs. american spying if one is from neither of the countries! american spying is targeting among other people me, whilst russian spying is targeting (mainly) russians and foreigners _on_russian_soil_ - in their country, according to their laws. they don't publicly pretend that they don't need to follow our laws while doing operations in our country but the leaders of the american intelligence apparatus have made time and time again comments that they don't need to give jack shit about our laws.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You risk extradition but at least you will be alive, unlike Litvinenko or Markov -- the Russians just don't bother with formal prosecution.

    8. Re:SLOP syndrome by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      What "oversight" prevented snowden from reaching far beyond his granted permissions?

      "LOVEINT" ...

      Are you fucking serious? Protip: being dropped on your head shouldn't be habit forming. Get help.

    9. Re:SLOP syndrome by lxs · · Score: 1

      You risk extradition but at least you will be alive

      Unless you end up on the list of the Dronemaster General.

    10. Re:SLOP syndrome by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 2

      Two wrongs doesn't make a right. So in terms of growing up, the "they also did it" excuse is as mature as a six-year old who gets caught red-handed, and tries to justify his wrong-doing because the other kids also stole from the cookie-jar.

      Regarding perspective, I think it would help if more people would read Bruce Schneier's "Beyond Fear". There he gives a very straight forward, for they layman, introduction to analysing risks and appropriate security measure response. In that light, it becomes clear that neither NSA's nor FSB's programs have anything to do with mitigating risks. It's not even about the pretence and security theatre any more (after all NSA's programs were mostly secret).

      It's pure corruption based cocaine induced money-making and dick-swinging: "Look, our data center has a gazillion coca-bytes!"; "We'll monitor you so thoroughly, we'll know when your wife is PMS'ing"; "I want a Star Trek Command Center! Wabu-wabu!!!" See Keith Alexander's ego trip for the last one - talk about being out of touch and lacking perspective.

    11. Re:SLOP syndrome by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You have to work to get there, it isn't bestowed freely.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    12. Re:SLOP syndrome by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      What the US has done should be judged against rights and laws, not the practices of other countries who may or may not be worse violators in similar respects.

    13. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahaha. Extradition? Russia doesn't extradite anybody. They execute you where you are. Extradition is so much messier, and takes longer.

    14. Re:SLOP syndrome by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The courts have thrown up their hands and stated PUBLICLY that they can no longer reign this in. So much for judicial oversight. The NSA blatantly lied to Congress and has faced no consequences for it. So much for legislative oversight.

      As for 2 or three, you maintain that it's fine to beat someone into a coma and as long as someone somewhere was killed outright the coma victim and family have no right to complain?

      Sorry, I would prefer not to set the bar as low as Russia or China. Not the worst is not much of an aspiration.

    15. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3) anybody being hauled away in the dead of night for offending the sensibilities of anybody in power.

      Sure about that?
       
        Terrance Yeakey

    16. Re:SLOP syndrome by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      There's more than that. Just building the infrastructure that can be abused later is not a light step to take.

      Oh they will only use it for terrorism...until they take down Silk Road. And after that...?

      With hundreds of agents having access and the ability to listen in on phone calls without warrants or detection (the warrant is apparently on the honor system) it will be abused to spy on political opponents to counteract and discredit, and there goes freedom.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    17. Re:SLOP syndrome by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Wow. You miss a lot of things that are happening in the world. Russia is very active both overtly and covertly in many parts of the world. Just exactly who do you think is propping up Assad? Who has been messing around in Georgia, Chechnya, the international portion of the Arctic?

      Maybe they don't have quite the reach that the US does. That's not be design - they basically can't afford all the stuff we can. If they could, they would.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    18. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) surveillance being subject to judicial and legislative oversight

      The oversight you mentioned is through a secretive and hidden court system whose decisions are final and cannot be publicly challenged. This is not the basis for good government.

      2) not being anywhere near as far-reaching as SORM or the Chinese systems

      Every system of tyranny has to start somewhere. Give it time, and it will be just as bad if not worse. Especially if there are further successful terrorist attacks. Liberty is dying in the US, and can easily be extinguished.

      3) anybody being hauled away in the dead of night for offending the sensibilities of anybody in power.

      Jose Padilla, who was not tried for any crime until after he was tortured and rotted in prison for five years. Anwar Al-Awlaki was accused of aiding and abetting terrorists, but was summarily executed even though evidence of his crimes has never been released. His 16 year old son was subsequently murdered in a drone strike two weeks later (the feds just shrugged and said "ooops!"). Several prisoners still in lockup at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who were never tried for any crime.

      There are many more to add to this list. You are taking it on faith that the federal government is telling you the truth in these matters, but again the evidence is rarely released publicly, because they are hoping you'll just forget about it and start watching Miley Cyrus again, or something.

    19. Re:SLOP syndrome by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      China and Russia both have a huge history of insane lack of regard for human rights. The Muslim states, with one or two exceptions, have been driven back into the dark ages by lack of education and fanatical, twisted versions of their religion. Russia remains so broken that crime seems to be the major industry with getting drunk as the national activity. The Muslim states are pretty much lost to civilization or even hope of civilization. China has put away much of their negative behavior and is advancing in many ways.

    20. Re:SLOP syndrome by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Your post reminds me of a comic strip of Bush and Cheney at Gitmo, with the punchline of "Certified not as bad as an actual Soviet GULAG".

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    21. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no death penalty in Russia. You can't be executed.

    22. Re:SLOP syndrome by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just because the "western" lethal injection is less painful than the "muslim" stoning doesn't mean that I'd really like to get either.

      Yes, there are places that are worse than what we have here. But when did "being better" become "being less awful"?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:SLOP syndrome by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Don't be evil!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    24. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the 16 year-old kid who was suspected of NOTHING except being descended from his father, you fascist prick.

    25. Re:SLOP syndrome by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      IOU one "insightful" mod.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    26. Re:SLOP syndrome by troff · · Score: 1

      > I suggest that some people need to grow up, and realise that the West is the absolute paragon of virtue compared to what Russia, China and Muslim countries are doing.

      > I shudder to think what will happen to the world when the baton of world domination is handed to these despots. I know the techno-libertarian crowd will be celebrating.

      That Russia is, as you put it, "the Devil Incarnate" and America opposes Russia in certain areas does not make America "the absolute paragon of virtue compared" (and you might want to think what "absolute" and "compared" mean).

      Instead, let's look at it this way: does the average Russian/American have any reason or want to harm the average American/Russian? No?

      Maybe the Good/Evil split should be viewed along different lines: does the average American/Russian have their lives made any harder by the American/Russian government, to the benefit of that government? Really? Well, maybe the American/Russian people might be viewing the government the way you think one "country" views another.

    27. Re:SLOP syndrome by russotto · · Score: 1

      The techno-libertarian community seemed to get a big dose of it when we saw those leaks from Snowden and friends. All of a sudden, we were the Devil incarnate, despite:

      1) surveillance being subject to judicial and legislative oversight

      The Right Honorable Judge Rubberstamp and Diane Fiendstein don't really count as "oversight".

      2) not being anywhere near as far-reaching as SORM or the Chinese systems, or

      Not nearly as VISIBLE as SORM or the Chinese systems -- but that's just a political thing. The Russians and Chinese want the plebes to know they're being watched.

      3) anybody being hauled away in the dead of night for offending the sensibilities of anybody in power.

      How would I know?

    28. Re: SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He got 99% of the votes"

      Ah, those were the days, Vladimir Ilyich...

    29. Re:SLOP syndrome by kermidge · · Score: 1

      True enough and good points.

      However I contend that politics is not, or perhaps should not be, about comparison shopping. One might propose politics as being a bit more than just being the pursuit of the possible but rather the betterment of the commonweal.

    30. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....or otherwise just another day in America....

      Don't we all look stupid voting for Obama and his "hope and change" platform.

    31. Re:SLOP syndrome by kermidge · · Score: 1

      A few years back I had recourse to read both what the U.S. and the UN had to say of torture. They were pretty close, btw. Both had exceptions granted to law-enforcement being allowed to applying measures necessary to obtain compliance. This is the loophole. The main criterion, if memory serves, is that no lasting damage be done.

      You're certainly welcome to look up the stuff, and I suggest anyone do so. It's informative.

    32. Re:SLOP syndrome by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      I think your answer is here:

      Anwar al Awlaki's son hoped 'to attain martyrdom as my father attained it'

      Anwar al Awlaki's son said he hoped "to attain martyrdom as my father attained it" just hours before he was killed in a US Predator airstrike in Yemen in mid-October, according to a journalist who sympathizes with al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

      Abdul Rahman al Awlaki, Anwar's 16-year-old son and an American citizen, made the statement to al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula's emir of the city of Azzam in Shabwa province. Azzan is one of several Yemeni cities currently under AQAP control.

      Abdul Rahman was killed in a Predator strike in Shabwa province on Oct. 14. The strike targeted Ibrahim al Bana, AQAP's media emir.

      So, you are quite wrong in multiple aspects. If you think that a 16 year old with a bomb vest or AK is less dangerous than an 18 year old, you would be mistaken again.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    33. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of a sudden, we were the Devil incarnate

      Some people may have gone overboard with the rhetoric or maybe this is more of a reflection of how they saw the US before these recent revelations. Many people in the US were taught how we were the Best and had the most Freedom of any people in the history of the world. Did they buy into the propaganda? Were they naive? I guess so. Now their ideal is shattered and their perspective has changed, so how do you expect them to view this unfamiliar country compared to the one they were taught to worship?

      I suggest that some people need to grow up, and realise that the West is the absolute paragon of virtue compared to what Russia, China and Muslim countries are doing.

      We should strive to improve ourselves and not be satisfied with just being better than some of the bad examples.

    34. Re:SLOP syndrome by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      You just disappear.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    35. Re:SLOP syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is the countries americans compare their own country to nowadays.

      No longer trying to be the most free country on the planet, but content with being just a little better (in their own minds, at least) than some of the worst.

  3. But the USA will still get the Gold Medal . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing can beat the NSA in the surveillance event competition!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:But the USA will still get the Gold Medal . . . by girlintraining · · Score: 0

      Nothing can beat the NSA in the surveillance event competition!

      They're merely afraid that someone will put up pictures of Putin in a tutu, or barebacking it with a horse, or any of the hundreds of other highly suggestive photos of the man who has decided gays are full of evil. There have been lots of protests and arrests in Russia over this lately, and demands both domestically and abroad that the Olympics be boycotted over this gross human rights violation.

      Nonetheless, the international community seems to be taking the view that entertainment exceeds human rights, and largely considers this an "internal" affair in Russia. All that said... guess what the response has been? "We're not going to have a problem here. We're going to surveil the shit out of everyone and everything. No protester will make it past the perimeter. Putin's horse-loving pictures will not make it into THIS facility!"

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:But the USA will still get the Gold Medal . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing can beat the NSA in the surveillance event competition!

      USA! USA! USA!

    3. Re:But the USA will still get the Gold Medal . . . by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Nothing can beat the NSA in the surveillance event competition!

      I don't know man, the Jamaicans are always tough and the Russians are not to be dismissed. Not sure how China's team is this year.... but I hear they are big.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:But the USA will still get the Gold Medal . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Russians will still do one-uppity surveillance as long as cash-Whuppity doesn't strike. Three rounds around an Orthodox church always do some good for the officials at Kremlin, on the other hand.

  4. Boycott that shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another reason to boycott the event.

  5. US/Russia/China/Iran vs the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is is nothing short of a war between powerful governments and the people of the world.

    The trouble is that only one side is fighting the war. The people are cheerfully thinking about nothing more than whether Facebook works, taking no steps to guard themselves, while the other side for decades has systematically been destroying their privacy and anonymity.

    It was clear from the outset who would win a war one side is too stupid to realize they are fighting. Now, here we are... no privacy left.

    1. Re:US/Russia/China/Iran vs the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is is nothing short of a war between powerful governments and the people of the world.

      I know what... maybe you should organize a boycott!

  6. Russia intends to monitor all UNENCRYPTED comms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody is going to stop you from encrypting your data, they just want to read the
    data you're too lazy to encrypt.. and so they will.

    1. Re:Russia intends to monitor all UNENCRYPTED comms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Virtually everybody is too lazy to encrypt their communications.

      Look at the USA/NSA debacle. The next day after the leaks, how many people started to encrypt their emails and texts? 99%? No. 50%? No. 1%? No. A tenth of a percent? Probably not even that many.

      People don't care about guarding their privacy, so they won't do what you suggest. You can argue that this means they get what they deserve, and maybe that's true, but it's going to be true for virtually every single person there.

  7. In soviet Russia by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

    Records break you!

    1. Re:in soviet russia by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You misspelled USA.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Why are you surprized? by tipo33 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This news doesn't come as a shock to me. Actually, I halfway respect the fact that they admit it flat out.

    1. Re:Why are you surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irregardless, everyone should stay away in protest. And every business that tracks their customers should go out of business for lack of customers. Unfortunately people fail to honor their honor and as long as their is a market for sadomasochism in governance and shopping, it will be provided. Meat for the plate, prisoners and slaves get tracked. Free people turn on anyone that attempts to track them, just like any other wild animal when you corner them. A slave bows down and begs forgiveness taking whatever comes next. Isn't it better not to be cornered? Even better to never be tracked.

    2. Re:Why are you surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the world we live in. All the shocking stories regarding Snowden shouldn't have been a surprise to anyone. Every major government is doing it and so are many of the biggest corporations in the world. Ever hear of Big Data, MapReduce, Hadoop, NoSQL, MongoDB, Cassandra? How much money have you paid directly over the past five years to Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, Linkedin, or any of the news (including tech focused) sites?

    3. Re:Why are you surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we need is the equivalent of the EFF to rate websites/services based on their privacy/cooperation with govt surveillance, so we could pick the least intrusive and give an economic incentive to companies to not 'over-cooperate' with repressive (i.e. most) governments.

    4. Re:Why are you surprized? by girlintraining · · Score: 0

      This news doesn't come as a shock to me. Actually, I halfway respect the fact that they admit it flat out.

      Yeah, but would you still feel that way once you knew the reasons for it?

      They're concerned that people might try that "free speech" thing, which has been a problem ever since Putin decided to wage a private war on gay people... and many are calling for a boycott of the olympics or protesting at the scene to raise awareness of the problem. That surveillance, which includes filtering technology and location awareness on cell phones, as well as deep state inspection, exists for but one purpose:

      To make sure everything looks just peachy for the press cameras, while the 10,000 other cameras hunt for anything that could spoil that rosey worldview... like protesters.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:Why are you surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was very happy in the pre-WWW paying hard cash for access to music, software, and other media. But it seems that on this site and its siblings (reddit, TechDirt, etc) everyone wants everything for free.

      Here's the $1 trillion question: how can companies like Google and Facebook employ tens of thousands of highly paid (even pampered) workers, with dozens of data centers featuring 1 million or more x86_64 servers running 24x7, if their end users don't pay anything for their services?

      Here are the answers:

      1) You don't get something for nothing.
      2) If something sounds to good to be true, it probably is.
      3) You don't get something for nothing.
      4) You don't get something for nothing.

    6. Re:Why are you surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I halfway respect the fact that they admit it flat out ...

      Because, like most freedom-deprived countries, Russia doesn't promise to protect its citizens. Only the USA claims to have freedoms that it totally destroys when convenient, regardless of the country or law.

    7. Re:Why are you surprized? by ScottyLad · · Score: 1

      They're concerned that people might try that "free speech" thing, which has been a problem ever since Putin decided to wage a private war on gay people... and many are calling for a boycott of the olympics or protesting at the scene to raise awareness of the problem.

      Unfortunately your post demonstrated more about your propensity to believe everything you read in the Western press than the reality of modern Russia.

      Putting personal opinion to one side on the subject of gay rights, there is no "war" on gay people in Russia, and certainly not a "private war". The recent legislation is actually extremely popular in Russia, and is almost identical to a UK law which was only recently abolished by Tony Blair. Both leaders were simply reflecting the will of their electorate as Britain becomes more liberal, and Russia worries about the moral decline and disintegration of the family they percieve as happening the West.

      Part of the problem is that Western society simply doesn't recognise the values of other countries. Russia has a very conservative population, who have a perfectly reasonable stance that they don't take well to people on the other side of the world trying to impose foreign values inside their own borders. In much the same way, American and British foreign policy seems to be based on the absurd notion that if everyone in the world was free to have what they wanted, they would want to be like the USA and Britain. It's simply not true.

      To make sure everything looks just peachy for the press cameras, while the 10,000 other cameras hunt for anything that could spoil that rosey worldview... like protesters.

      As someone who spends my time between London and Moscow, I can assure you that you are no more or less likely to see protests in either city.

      I've been in the centre of Moscow when there have been pro-government and anti-government demonstrations on the same day, and they weren't anything particularly remarkable compared to anything I've seen in London. I was also in London on the day of Margaret Thatcher's funeral, where there were plenty of news crews desperately trying to find some protesters to film to support their own narrative. In the whole day, I saw one anti-Thatcher protester, and a large group protesting about the death penalty in some ex-colony somewhere or other. The news will generally find someone to film to back up their own narrative, as rabble-rousers can always be found on all sides. Unfortunately as most Westerners don't speak Russian, it's hard from them to get a balanced view. I read the Russian press from all sides and somewhere in the middle lies the truth - in much the same way as in the UK - filtering out the opinion pieces in the Telegraph and the Guardian gives you a much better idea of the facts than a quasi-state broadcaster like the BBC.

      The notion that Russians are an oppressed people is as outdated as the Cold War. They are a democratic country with no more allegations of electoral fraud than the UK (yes, it happens in all countries to some extent, and we're not exempt simply be being "western"). The Western press only ever talks about Putin, and ignores the widely respected Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. Perhaps the fact the President and Prime Minister having a good working relationship together doesn't suit the narrative of a country like America which seemingly can't keep their own government running despite wanting to run everyone else's country for them.

      What matters to most people my age in Moscow are the same things which matter to most people my age in London. Concerns about the effect of an ageing population. Suspicion that the generation before us are the last ones who will have decent pensions to support them in their old age. Worries about house prices increasing faster than wages. What they don't tend to be overly concerned about are laws which reflect the overwhelming sentiment of the public, and which are only concerned with the protection of minors. In modern Russia, grown-ups can do what they please, including visiting gay bars if they so desire.

      --
      Philosopher (n) - a wise person who is calm and rational; someone who lives a life of reason with equanimity
    8. Re:Why are you surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one in the entire conversation said they wanted anything for free, they said they wanted to keep their FREEDOM! Which they can not do if they lose their privacy. Information is power and power corrupts. The use of someone's private information is an assault on them, the degree of which varies depending on the information, how it is used and its effect on them from that use.

      How many Jews proudly answered to that fact when filling out their census forms in assorted European countries prior to WWII? IBM Hollerith machines and the captured files strongly aided the Nazis in sorting out the Jews and sending them to concentration camps.

      Lots of other less controntational information can be used to create damaging lies, but don't worry, they are based on documented facts after all! Have any idea how many bomb making materials you have purchased in x time or how many you currently have around your home at the moment? If you say none, your either clueless or a liar, perhaps somewhere in between. That is, assuming that you are not homeless yet.

    9. Re:Why are you surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one in the entire conversation said they wanted anything for free, they said they wanted to keep their FREEDOM!

      Not on this thread, but in every story involving issues of copyright law (Slashdot features several each week, e.g. all the ones of Aaron Swartz) about 90 percent of the posters here insist that practically all media companies that started before the Internet age have outmoded business models, and furthermore, that is justification for netizens "infringing" their properties through file sharing (less high-falutin' arguments are also frequently heard, such as that the company executives are greedy bastards who know nothing about music or literature, and that the bands signed by record labels never get any of the proceeds anyway).

      And I'm thinking in the back of my mind, be careful what you wish for. You just might get it. And this being a capitalist society, providers of content WILL extract value from the consumers - or they'll go out of business! They'll do it by meticulously (and often deviously) tracking information about visitors, cross-referencing that with other information about the visitors, archiving and reducing and data mining that information. Just like the NSA and FSB, they have ways.

      Personally I prefer the good ol' days, where advertisers relied on imprecise aggregate models like the Nielson surveys, and most media products (other than TV shows) were for sale in hardcopy or recorded format and not tracked.

    10. Re:Why are you surprized? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      To make sure everything looks just peachy for the press cameras, while the 10,000 other cameras hunt for anything that could spoil that rosey worldview... like protesters.

      out of context, I could not tell WHICH country you are referring to. the US fully meets your example. we have had 'free speech zones' the last 10 or so yrs and even college campuses are starting to do this crap.

      the occupy movement was either ignored by the press or put in the worst possible light, to make fun of them. they were protesters and had a right to their views (and mostly had legit concerns, too) but we didn't treat them as people with complaints, we made fun of them.

      so much for right to protest grievances and right to free speech.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  9. Off-topic discussion about USA in 3.. 2... 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already too late.

  10. In America you watch the Olympics by HeavenlyWhistler · · Score: 5, Funny

    but in Soviet Russia, Olympics watch YOU!

  11. Pot, Kettle... by Diddlbiker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It'll be hard for the US government to file a formal complaint without getting laughed at, as they've been doing the same (although not limited to Olympic Games) in their own country.

  12. Photos by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Just send lots of photos, png format of course, home attached to your emails. That way you can say anything you want by using undetectable steganography.

    1. Re:Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want noisy jpg format so that you encrypted data can hide in the noise.

    2. Re:Photos by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      No you want to subtly adjust the rgb values of a loss less data format so without access to the original image file there is no evidence what so ever of the overlayed information. And because it is just a normal picture not even advanced data analysis can detect the overlayed information. The only way to extract it is via brute force and well depending on the size of the image the sun may die first.

    3. Re:Photos by Hypotensive · · Score: 1

      So you think that I have something that I wish to communicate secretly, and I am going to do so using a piece of software that I can't see the source code to?

      Not sure what millenium you're living in there bro.

    4. Re:Photos by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      Um, it is a java apk file, zip file, just decompose it there are tools on the net. Besides since you have the original png and the shaded one you can actually compare the two and see exactly what the code is doing. Any way contact the authors they may release the code.

    5. Re:Photos by Hypotensive · · Score: 1

      I can't decompose (decompile?) it because I can't download it.

      I can't download it because downloading it would mean making a copy of it.

      I can't make a copy of it because that would infringe the author's copyright since they have not published it under a licence which gives me the right to make such a copy.

      As far as contacting the authors is concerned, I see little point. I'm hardly going to trust my security to a developer who can't even install an HTTPS certificate correctly, let alone distribute under a licence that allows distribution.

  13. Think of it as Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with no alternative service available, and FSB doing the compilation and analysis instead of Google.

  14. This is new? by reemul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Face it, the IOC is perfectly OK with corruption, oppression, censorship, and spying, as long as committee members get their payoffs, a pleasant facade is maintained while cameras are rolling, and nobody but Jews get killed. Russia wishes they could have the all encompassing monitoring that Beijing had, but they just don't currently have the resources. Keeping the athletes in segregated housing simply makes it easier to ensure that every single area is bugged, and each and every person there that the participants can possibly come in contact with is engaged in intelligence collecting.

    --
    You're just jealous 'cuz the voices talk to *me*
    1. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure that the IOC actually forced Russia to monitor all communications.

      You may have noticed the last few times of the Olympics the IOC are really trying to limit the amount of information leaving the Olympic games. Athletes who aren't allowed to make pictures and videos, etc. The IOC aren't the only sport organisations who are this way.

      I am pretty sure the Russians are simply protecting the "copyright" of the Olympic games as ordered by the IOC to be able for Russia to host the games.

    2. Re:This is new? by drfuchs · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. Reemul is making an oblique reference to the 1972 Olympics where 11 Jewish athletes were murdered; look up "Munich massacre" on wikipedia.

    3. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just go fuck yourself, or a Jew.

    4. Re:This is new? by reemul · · Score: 1

      Hey chuckle head - I'm not an anti-Semite. I was strongly implying that members of the *IOC*, not me, were OK with killing Jews. Picking on Israel is pretty much a competitive activity for most of the member countries. Athletes in international competition can refuse to face Israelis and aren't crushed for it the way a Russian athlete would be if he refused a match with a gay athlete. And the IOC for 40 years has steadfastly refused to allow any commemoration of the murders in Munich whatsoever.

      And Russia, no matter their intent and access to tech, does not currently have the cash to pay for the massive numbers of internal informants that China has. Maybe back in the peak Soviet years, but not now, even with current income from supplying energy. And where the f*ck did you get "tin foil hat" and any examination whatsoever about Russian motive in the three sentences I posted?

      --
      You're just jealous 'cuz the voices talk to *me*
    5. Re:This is new? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2

      Well to be fair -- the IoC did let the Nazis host an Olympics and by all accounts, it was a grand ol' time.
      How could letting Russia host an Olympics possibly be any worse?

    6. Re:This is new? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair -- the IoC did let the Nazis host an Olympics and by all accounts, it was a grand ol' time.

      Jesse Owens had a good time, in any case.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:This is new? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      Part of the reasoning for letting Nazi Germany host the olympics was that every medal won by a black athlete would be a slap in the face to Hitler. I'm sure the IOC only cared about their bribes, but that doesn't necessarily invalidate the political reasoning used to sell it to the public.

      If any gay athletes go to Moscow, I hope they will wear some obvious gay pride symbols on the medal box to give Putin a slap in the face too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not see how this was anti-semetic in any way. The IOC did not endorse the terrorist attack. In all reports I found online, it seems they tried to remain as neutral as possible, treating the games as 'neutral territory'.

      The terrorists sure didn't treat the games as neutral territory. The IOC is so neutral that they are now allowing the terrorist organization that conducted the attack to participate as a country. You don't see how this can upset the victims?

      If you need a clue, the flag of Palestine looks like this.

    9. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it's considered poor form to make an oblique reference to something that happened before most of the people on the site were likely born.

      The only point being made here is that he's gotten so old and senile that

      No reason to throw garbage at others because you haven't heard of the Munich massacre (I have, and it happened many years before I was born -- they even made a movie about it in 2005) and couldn't be bothered to extend the benefit of the doubt to another poster far enough to Google related terms.

    10. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... it's considered poor form ...

      Considering the assassinations done by Mossad in retaliation for the Munich massacre were made into 2 movies almost recently, (2005 & 2006) the events of 40 years ago should be in the popular consciousness of young people too.

    11. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your failure to pay attention during history class does not create an obligation for others to include a history lesson with their posts. Grow the fuck up.

    12. Re:This is new? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      He could also be referring to the summer and winter games of 1936. That was probably also before you were born, but I'd hope I don't need to send you to a wiki page about Nazi Germany.

    13. Re:This is new? by rk · · Score: 1

      You know, it's considered poor form to make an oblique reference to something that happened before most of the people on the site were likely born.

      Yeah, I hate it when people just assume I'm educated.

  15. And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how americans love to throw up their arms at these FUD about China and Russia, all while having not reports, but PROOF that their country is doing stuff that is much worse.

    At least Russia and China are not invading countries and killing hundreds of thousands of people so they can loot them and then pass them a bill for the "reconstruction".

  16. And how do they plan to deal with.. by ltning · · Score: 1

    ...gnupg? ...tor? ...ssl+pfs? ...ssh? ...ipsec? ...openvpn? ...voip? .....<insert your favorite encryption/privacy tool here>?

    Block everything? That would probably kick up more dust than the anti-gay legislation.

    --
    Love over Gold.
    1. Re:And how do they plan to deal with.. by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Simple. When your device downloads any data over the network it will be infected with malware and all the encryption in the world is useless if your machine is compromised. Later, when you return home, your machine makes you into a Russian Spy.

      I mean, that's how the NSA gets around Tor...

    2. Re:And how do they plan to deal with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      . When your device downloads any data over the network it will be infected with malware and all the encryption in the world is useless

      The NSA attack depended on people being dumb enough to run the javascript in the attack payload. If you're dumb enough to do that, you deserve what you get. Furthermore, it used an exploit targeting the Windows version of Firefox.

      You seem somewhat confused. "Downloading data over the network" doesn't automatically infect your machine with malware unless your download app is buggy, or you go running scripts or executables that you downloaded. You have to be pretty damned ignorant to do that in a situation where you are trying to preserve your security and privacy from organizations like the FSB or NSA.

      Sandbox your browser in a VM, don't use Windows, don't run scripts served to you by random pages you have no reason to trust, and that will improve your security by about 99.99%. Yes, I know, it isn't 100%, and therefore a bunch of slashdotters will say, "but it's useless, because it's not absolutely PERFECT", but in fact the NSAs attack you allude to and virtually every other malware distribution mechanism would not succeed.

      If you go running malware payloads, you will get infected: news at 11.

    3. Re:And how do they plan to deal with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They will release ... the WDU (Wrench-decryption-unit): http://xkcd.com/538/

    4. Re:And how do they plan to deal with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Later, when you return home, your machine makes you into a Russian Spy.

      I'm guessing any country that can afford it will give their athletes temporary laptops and phones that will be incinerated upon conclusion of the games: no silicon comes home.

    5. Re:And how do they plan to deal with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you're right, and not just athletes. Imagine all the journalists, telecoms, and security services the Russians could potentially compromise once they get home with infected silicon.

  17. We have become despots by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) surveillance being subject to judicial and legislative oversight

    You mean the secret surveillance conducted by a secret agency under secret orders with secret legal justification, "overseen" by a secret rubber stamp court with secret findings? Exactly how do you propose oversight works when there is no accountability to the electorate whatsoever?

    2) not being anywhere near as far-reaching as SORM or the Chinese systems,

    Got proof to back that up? I didn't think so.

    3) anybody being hauled away in the dead of night for offending the sensibilities of anybody in power.

    So you are claiming the US government has never engaged in extraordinary rendition and does not operate a prison camp without any due process?

    I suggest that some people need to grow up, and realise that the West is the absolute paragon of virtue compared to what Russia, China and Muslim countries are doing.

    Not it the last 10 years, particularly in the US. The US has engaged in kidnapping, torture, secret and illegal surveillance, political assassinations, gag orders without any warrant or due process, and started two unjustified wars which are still going on over a decade later, and you want to claim that we are a "paragon of virtue"? Maybe we are better but it certainly isn't by much these days. Hell we had a president who was awarded the Nobel peace prize and used the opportunity to argue why war is sometimes necessary. Talk about hypocritical.

    1. Re:We have become despots by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      If these were the Nixon years, would a G. Gordon Liddy type of agent walk in and listen to conversations? With little or no technological barriers or even uncorruptible logging with review, then what?

      It's not about the honest agent. IT's about power grabs. Powerful people only need one, and if he can get lost in the woodwork...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:We have become despots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and an "absolute paragon of virtue" to boot. What an outrageously bigoted comment.

      Islam is not a crime. You covered the rest.

  18. The NSA does surveillance the correct way. by mozumder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess you missed all the leaks which revealed that oversight worked?

    I'm amazed at how little snooping of American citizens were going on. There was a number in the press that about 50,000 emails of US citizens were mistakenly collected.

    I have 50,000 unread emails in my inbox alone.

    So, the NSA's surveillance program is robust enough that, out of 300 million people, they had an oversight margin-of-error of 1 person.

    That's it.

    This is how a proper government surveillance programs are SUPPOSED to work - filled with both technical and legal checks and balances.

    And remember, government surveillance is a good thing. We need to make sure libertarians understand that. Government surveillance enables a stronger government, which is always a good, since a big government is better than a small government.

    NOBODY wants a small government. A small government results in Somalia. Everybody wants a strong, socialist government, instead.

    A strong, socialist government produces much better results, resulting in a stronger, richer population.

    Just look at how Reaganomics destroyed America. It is these Republican principles that caused such economic disparity in America, because they weakened government.

    We need to make sure we undo all the work that the Reagan Republicans did.

    1. Re:The NSA does surveillance the correct way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed at how little snooping of American citizens were going on. There was a number in the press that about 50,000 emails of US citizens were mistakenly collected.

      And you *believe* these numbers? Why? They've lied pretty consistently about everything else.

    2. Re:The NSA does surveillance the correct way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I have 50,000 unread emails in my inbox alone.
      That is assuming those are real emails. Nice fallancy.

  19. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The medal is YOU! =)

  20. Re: Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes. But most people are too stupid. They only care about being entertained.

    Panem et circensem.
    As the Romans said.

    Bread and games.
    To keep the plebs happy and docile.

  21. Russia has Middle East enemies over Syria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia has enemies in Chechnya. Some financing of Chech rebels has been traced to the middle East. More recently, it was rumored that Prince Bandar suggested to Putin that there would be no trouble at the Olympics if Assad received less support. Islamists fighting in Syria are mad, because of Russia's extensive support to Syria. The 2014 Olympics would be a great way for terrorists to strike at Russia. If I was Russia, I'd be spying on the 2014 Olympics up the wazoo.

  22. Secret Agent Man by slowdeath · · Score: 1

    Ever consider that maybe Edward Snowden is a double agent, planted by the NSA to infiltrate the Russian security service and spill their most secret documents to the web? Me neither.

    1. Re:Secret Agent Man by will_die · · Score: 1

      Change of that 0.
      However I am expecting to see snowden standing next to Putin waving at the crowds during the opening ceremony.

  23. NBC will use this to say why can't have it live by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    NBC will use this to say why can't have it shown live even if it's not delaying the broadcast

    1. Re:NBC will use this to say why can't have it live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't watch it if you're not happy with russia's politics.

  24. in soviet russia by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    we monitor you!

  25. A second reason by Linzer · · Score: 1

    The notion of human rights seems quite foreign to Russia's leaders today. This follows the incredible state-sponsored persecution of LGBT people, which taps into (and caters to) the already fairly widespread homophobia in large parts of the population.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/opinion/russias-anti-gay-crackdown.html?_r=0

    --
    Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
  26. Yes, but... why ? by feufeu · · Score: 1

    Is this some sort of 'Hey we can do this even better !' or what exactly could be the point of - besides fighting, err, terrorism of course - spying on everyone at the olympics ? Don't get me wrong, I still wish that there wouldn't this sort of spying on harmless people, but what exactly could be gained from it ?

    1. Re:Yes, but... why ? by akozakie · · Score: 1

      Actually... I see it as a fair warning and in the current situation (with the USA getting hammered for listening in on pretty much everything) reads pretty much as a "who's the good guy now" directed at America.

      They are basically saying this: "Hi. We're organizing a big event, a natural target for terrorist attacks. So, while this should be obvious, we'll warn you: we're prepared and we will listen in on anything we possibly can to avert any destructive plans. So, if you come here - do not expect any privacy, either over phone or over the Internet. Thank you for your attention."

      And the funny thing is that this actually looks unbelievably fair compared to recent news from the USA. "Do not have expectation of privacy" is a fair warning. At the same time recent news made it clear that any time I use a service on the Internet the data is more likely than not to be available to US - unless the service is hosted in a non-US-friendly country and routing avoids the US. And noone said so.

      Not that I expected anything else, but expectation of privacy is an important concept. Russia saying upfront that privacy will be ignored during the games actually sounds positive now. Sure, they will abuse it, but they are not claiming that your privacy matters. The US did. Hell, we just had a big discussion whether crucial Internet services (like IP allocation) should be moved under UN control. And you had the f...g guts to claim that it was "more free" as it is, that the move was to apply undue control.

      Look what you've done to your contry. Land of the free, right...

  27. Didn't the NSA attack take advanage of a bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there a vulnerability that allowed them to turn javascript back on?

    1. Re:Didn't the NSA attack take advanage of a bug? by Ingenium13 · · Score: 1

      No, the browser in the Tor Bundle used to have NoScript enabled by default. They sometime since then changed it to be disabled by default. Last I checked it's still disabled by default.

  28. Re: Boycott by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Well, if history taught us anything, then that Rome didn't outlast that phase of its existence for more than a few hundred years before the barbarians steamrolled all over them.

    And given the speed of development these days, I'd be surprised if this goes on another decade or two before the steamroller comes down on us.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Re:This is related? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    In what way is this related in any way to corruption? The IOC did not go forward in time, read this news, and then go back and approve Russia. I have no doubt that payoffs happen, and as demonstrated by the China games' focus on minimizing pollution to be just under the obviousness threshold, the facade has to be maintained even when the problem is well known. But how is this one of those "face it" times that demonstrates whatever point you failed to make?

    On the international stage, if we limit the selection committee to only those places where there is no corruption or oppression, there would be no Olympics - because every country is seen as corrupt in some fashion to at least a few other countries. So everyone is off the list.

    Not sure what your point is re: keeping athletes in segregated housing. Almost like only athletes could be suspect, and anyone who wants to talk to them would go to athlete housing, and they can't leave at all, which is clearly not true.

    If you take this at face value "will face some of the most invasive and systematic spying and surveillance in the history of the Games" as well as the "all communications" part of the article's headline, your comment about the Russian vs. Chinese resources falls apart.

  30. Why would you go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont get it.
    Apple trips over itself to endorse Communism.
    Rather do business there than wait on trickle down here.

    Human Rights are really no longer important.
    No one in their right mind would put it there and if it did get bribed into the place no one would go.

    You know I trained all my life for a job But if me or others are mistreated I still have quit the job.
    3 jobs I walked away from that thought they were a real big deal have folded.
    Looks like I was not the only one voting with their feet or not returning for business.

  31. And where is Edward Snowden? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    In Russia, showing them how to get it done.

  32. Big Comrade by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, State watches you!

    Err... what changed?

    --
    When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
  33. But but but by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    I thought you all said only the USA does this.. so this cant be true.. right?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  34. Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A prince named Bandar bin Sultan, the head of saudi arabian secret agency, recently visited the Kremlin and openly blackmailed Vladimir Putin, saying their vahhabite regime will make sure the Sochi winter games remain free from extremist attacks, in exchange for Moscow abandoning the Assad regime in Syria. (The saudi sunni vahhabite muslims have a religious grudge against the shia-leaning and more secularized alavite muslims of Syria. Most jihadists fighting against the worldly government in Syria are actually saudi death row and arm chop-off sentenced inmates, who are offered parole if they win, pending hostage captivity of their relatives as an assurance.)

    Anyhow, Putin czar sent Prince Bandar home and stated he has utmost trust in the russian security establisment, including the FSB, GRU and Spetnaz (the latter one is the DEV-GRU that belongs to GRU, not CIA).

    In such a situation, utmost surveillance and operational intelligence gathering is necessary, because the humiliated and enraged saudi vahhabite will be sending echelons of would be fedayeen (self-offer warriors) to Soci and also many chechen tenorists will try to gain carnal knowledge of TV screens with ample gore offerings. Therefore, Russia will have to reign with an iron fist in its southern territories, so that nothing bad can happen. Phone eavesdropping is the littlest of your worries in such a situation!

    1. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Suiggy · · Score: 1

      Completely agree with the parent. Most people here haven't been keeping track of the bigger picture.

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10266957/Saudis-offer-Russia-secret-oil-deal-if-it-drops-Syria.html

      The Saudis tried to blackmail Putin into dropping their support of Syria, first offering them a secret oil deal, and then threatening to cause a terrorist attack during the Olympic games in Russia. Putin refused.

  35. Two words by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    Sat phones

    1. Re:Two words by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      16 words: they don't have tightly directional antennae anymore, why would you think they'd be impervious to eavesdropping?

    2. Re:Two words by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      They can listen but they can't play man in the middle like they can with any land based system. Minimally they could watch for VPN type connections with any land communications and then block them forcing you to use weak or no encryption. But with a sat phone they can just know that you are using it and be sad.

      So assuming you are using a good encryption over the line (assuming the sat phone itself uses crappy encryption) then your connection should be good.

  36. Really? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    That sounds like a challenge to me!

    Somethingawful event: See who can send the internet monitors screaming from the room the fastest.
    Cryptographers event: See who can code the best covert channel that the monitors won't notice.

    Piracy event: See who can distribute footage of the events without the Olympics Committee noticing.

    Sports? We don't need no steenkin sports! (Except maybe for the piracy event.)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  37. US is not despotic - Russia and PRC are. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    So you are claiming the US government has never engaged in extraordinary rendition and does not operate a prison camp without any due process

    Both of which require a much higher threshold than what is considered worthy of action in Russia or China. In China, it merely requires the uttering of an unharmonious joke against a public official. In Russia, it only requires that you publish something unsavory enough to offend the government.

    In the US, you actually have to be a threat to human life - instead of a journalist, a politician, or an ordinary citizen that said the wrong thing at the wrong time.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:US is not despotic - Russia and PRC are. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the US, you actually have to be a threat to human life - instead of a journalist, a politician, or an ordinary citizen that said the wrong thing at the wrong time.

      BULLSHIT!

      you could not be more wrong. little subtle things like getting on the no-fly list (and not being able to confirm it or get off of it) is one example. there are others which neither you nor I am aware of but I fully believe exist, given the current climate of the US gov.

      you don't have to be kidnapped at 3am. there are other ways to ruin your life if you piss off someone high enough up in the food chain.

      you can find it hard to get a job. you can be on a 'no hire list'. you can find your taxes are 'extra well reviewed' and are on the audit list more than you think would be reasonable. you can be wiretapped and monitored more closely. many things can happen that is way short of being 'taken in the night'.

      wake up! we are slowly cooking the frog, here. you need to get out of the storyland fable that you were taught as a kid and realize what our country has slowly become.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  38. Re:Not surprising since Putin was already threaten by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10266957/Saudis-offer-Russia-secret-oil-deal-if-it-drops-Syria.html
    AL-CIAda: the freedom fighters that just keep on helping, generation after generation.
    “I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us,”

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  39. Difference between USA and Russia surveillance by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    There is a difference between US and Russia surveillance: contrarily to the former, the later never claimed to be the land of freedom. Russians are slowly leaning to democracy, but it is not surprising the journey is long, if you considered they only had the Czar and the communist regime before.

  40. The really interesting question is... by Glasswire · · Score: 1

    ... when some foreign visitor sends a strongly encrypted message they the Russian authorities find difficult or impossible to decrypt. If this were a typical Russian citizen, this would probably merit a visit from some representative of the authorities who will persuade you that the encryption is a bad idea based on bad consequences if you don't. In the case of the international attendees, one assumes the Russians will not able to do this quite so casually. But they will probably be pretty obsessed with those visitors...

  41. Missed opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a prime example of a way the US government could subsidize activities it's already engaged in. You know the NSA will also be monitoring everything, they could just sell what they intercept and pay for their next data warehouse building in the US.

  42. A pathetically low level of ethics by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Both of which require a much higher threshold than what is considered worthy of action in Russia or China.

    Way to set the bar low. So because they are engaged in completely reprehensible conduct that means it is somehow ok for the US to engage is conduct that is just mostly reprehensible? Sorry but I expect MUCH more from our leaders than to be just a little bit better than a repressive dictatorship.

    In the US, you actually have to be a threat to human life - instead of a journalist, a politician, or an ordinary citizen that said the wrong thing at the wrong time.

    No you do not have to be an actual threat to anyone. You just have to be perceived as a threat by one of the various homeland security agencies regardless of the validity of that perception. There are countless examples of people being jailed for jokes, harmless tweets, and the like. Journalists have been jailed for reporting on government malfeasance. Hell, in the 1940s we wrongly imprisoned thousands of completely innocent US citizens of japanese descent because of the mere fact that they were of Japanese descent. Furthermore tell that to the hundreds of innocent people who ended up in Guantanamo Bay. Over 600 people have been released from there without any charge and never should have been there in the first place. Most who remain are there admittedly because there is insufficient admissible evidence to convict them of any crime. That is NOT how a country that follows rule of law should behave.

  43. Re: Boycott by cavreader · · Score: 1

    The Roman empire lasted close to a thousand years not a few hundred. And after Rome fell the world rapidly descended into that period lovingly referred to as the "Dark Ages".

  44. Re: Boycott by Evtim · · Score: 1

    The dark ages are due to the Catholic church. There was nothing "dark" in the East of Europe after the fall of Rome. We did great in fact...

  45. Why Snowden in US and The Guardian in Russia? by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    Why did we need someone to throw himself over the coals and run away to seek asylum and cause international incidents to find out about this stuff happening in the US, but in Russia, it gets announced through media outlets and Olympic fever.

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.
  46. Re: Boycott by cavreader · · Score: 1

    Religion was only a part of the reason for decline. Not every single province or country experienced the same amount or type of decline but the majority did. The Roman empire administered a huge amount of territory that provided a measure of stability across the board. At it's high point one quarter of the world population fell under Roman control. A lot of people relied on that administrative and trading framework to prosper. During it's conquests the Romans helped spread a common language along with providing a measure of modern civilization for that time period. Corruption and civil wars also contributed to Rome's fall. After Rome fell feudalism, religion, and just plain survival for some became the driving factors of the day. Towards the very end the "Black Death" was the final straw because it hit populations already weakened by Rome's fall.

  47. boycott watching the games and tell your broadcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how to tell russia that you don't like what they are doing?

    do not watch the games, do not watch streams, just ignore everything from the games.
    And tell those who try to bring broadcasts to you, that you do not watch that, and you are encouraging all your friends to do the same.

    Best to start doing this now, before broadcasters buy expensive rights which they can't monetize by ads because noone is watching.

  48. So, Russia does what the US does every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to itself, and the world...

  49. Re: Boycott by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    In total, yes. What I talked about was the end of the Empire, the time past 100BC, when "panem et circenses" became the corner stone of the domestic policy.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  50. Re: Boycott by cavreader · · Score: 1

    "Bread and Circuses" can often bring stability.

  51. Re: Boycott by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It's only a stopgag, not a solution. Sadly, it's often mistaken for one.

    Bread and games is sedating the population, it makes them happy and distracts them from the underlying problem, but the problem itself remains. Unless you're willing to solve that, don't expect "bread and games" to solve it for you.

    There are two ways this can bite you in the rear. First, the obvious one, that the population will remember, with a vengeance, their problems when you should for some reason be unable to provide more bread and games. And now YOU are the bad guy. Because you promised them food and entertainment and you failed to deliver, so they have to face ugly reality again. And no matter who is actually responsible for their problems (likely, they themselves) since YOU failed and they can only see it because of your failure, YOU are responsible for it in their eyes.

    To make matters worse, and that's what actually fell Empires in the past, a complacent population is also an idle one. An attitude of "we're number 1" is almost instantly followed by "then why try harder?" Once you're at the point where you sedate your population with games and food, and keep them occupied by getting them worked up over non-issues so they can't concentrate on matters of importance (religion and religious topics, from abortion to homosexuality, work like a charm there), it doesn't take long until another civilization catches up, overtakes and takes over.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  52. Impossible by narucy · · Score: 0

    How will they do that? HTTPS is completely secure. (Exclude browser/OS backdoor using). Never ever decryption key out going network. Stay on computer memory.

  53. Poor sod. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The people fumbling for power are different factions of the same powerful class.

    USians still believe those people represent them...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  54. Sure, we are imagining things. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    President-Prime Minister-President

    Opposition: in jail or in exile, some of them murdered in suspicious circumstances.

    But whatever you say buddy.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  55. Monitoring by brunnegd · · Score: 1

    Snowden handed the Ruskies the NSA docs showing how to monitor all electronics. Should be simple to implement.