Slashdot Mirror
Book Review: The Circle
The book's eponymous tech firm earns untold billions of dollars off the Unified Operating System, a portal through which virtually the entire world accesses the broader Web. The OS bans anonymous identities; all social information is posted out there for anyone to peruse; currencies such as Bitcoin have been discarded in favor of online banking accounts irrevocably linked to real identities. The Circle itself is headquartered in the Bay Area, on a playful campus that caters to its employees’ every material whim, so long as they're willing to work twenty-plus hours a day.
That the world would accept something like the Circle’s omnipresent software without debate, of course, is the most far-fetched of the book’s assumptions. But Eggers needs that exaggerated scenario to support his larger theme of how we’re slowly but surely letting our privacy slip away from us in exchange for digital baubles, and how online interactions—clicking "Likes," viewing posts—is an imperfect substitution for real life. As one of his characters (who acts as the doomed Voice of Reason) states early on:
“Judgments like ‘like’ and ‘dislike’ and ‘smiles’ and ‘frowns’ were limited to junior high. Someone would write a note and it would say, ‘Do you like unicorns and stickers?’ and you’d say, ‘Yeah, I like unicorns and stickers! Smile!’ That kind of thing. But now it’s not just junior high kids who do it, it’s everyone, and it seems to me sometimes that I’ve entered some inverted zone, some mirror world where the dorkiest shit in the world is completely dominant. The world has dorkified itself.”
The Circle’s employees, of course, have little problem with that world (until the end, of course, when another major character attempts to bring the whole system crashing down). Even if Eggers gets the technology wrong, in order to service his broader point, he perfectly nails the spirit of hubris and incessant self-congratulation that’s gripped many startups and tech behemoths in this era of easy VC money, huge app audiences, and massive acquisitions. That bit of software that makes all the world’s information easily accessible, he’s whispering in the background, is totally missing the point of what constitutes a real, lived-in existence.
In other words, The Circle isn’t much of a cautionary tale for the broader world, as no single commercial firm will ever (hopefully) eradicate our privacy to the degree that the company and its characters accomplish in the novel (although it’s clear that some tech giants will do their level best). But on another level, the text can still act as a cautionary tale to the current generation of developers and entrepreneurs” who think their software will effortlessly change the world for the better.
You can purchase The Circle from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews (sci-fi included) — to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
If I have to read that again, I'm heading for the closest bridge at high speed.
If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
"1) Sharing content with people online is a poor substitute for having real-life experiences with, like, kayaking and family gatherings and drinking and stuff."
True, but I consider it to be like pornography: It may be a poor substitute for the real thing but it's there if you need it.
And for those who live in the country, social networking is an IMPROVEMENT over the old isolation.
"2) Unless stopped, companies that build social-networking tools will create increasingly intrusive software."
Duh.
"3) The only sure way to stay sane our increasingly interconnected (Eggers would say over-connected) world is to drive at high speed off a bridge."
Bullshit.
Sure, there are negative elements in the above. But see (1) for example. Yes, there are addicts who exclude the real world for electronic "social" life. But for a great many people, it is a vast improvement over earlier times. It all depends on how you use it. I use it for specific reasons and for specific purposes (and yes, this is one of them, for reasons of my own).
As for #2, it's what people like me have been saying for years. Does Dave Eggers think this is some kind of revelation or something?
And #3 is just nonsense. Unless you are the kind of person who has no control over her own decisions.
"In other words, The Circle isnâ(TM)t much of a cautionary tale for the broader world"
No, the review makes it sound more like a tale deliberately written not so much as a cautionary one as a semi-political screed designed mostly to vent their authors opinions while appealing to certain tinfoil hat crowd.
90% of the parties I attend have been set up by someone on Facebook. If it wasn't for Facebook, I'd miss nine out of ten parties my friends were throwing. (As opposed to the half I miss now due to conflicting obligations or not feeling like going.)
While the dire warnings in the book have some merit, we should also recognize that there are legitimate tools and uses in our social media and not discount it wholesale. (I always call Facebook the junk food of the Internet. Even junk food can have a few fortified vitamins tossed in there.)
Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
Like, I like, totally like think you like, missed his point.
Like.
An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
I don't need a bridge to drive into - I just avoid all this stuff and I'm perfectly happy. No pop culture, no DRM or walled gardens, no social media. I don't think life is any the worse for ignoring all that.
I think the idea was to point out that drinking is a direct social engagement, rather than an indirect one like everything you do online; I doubt "teh booze industry" would bother with subliminal ads on a marginal website, when blatant advertising on major media networks is so damn effective.
Now go grab me a sixxer of Silver Bullets so I can have a bunch of models come and hang off my junk like they do in the commercials. That happens, right?
An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
It's different with family. Facebook et al lets you avoid real social interaction with family members. There's certainly a measurable difference in this "online" vs "real" social interaction, measured in stabbings and shootings. There's a reason why the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays are the busiest times of the year for emergency rooms.
So, yes, I'd certainly say "less real", but that's not in any way the opposite of "better". For example, it's unlikely that any interaction between your online friends and your girlfriend will end with someone in the emergency room and someone in jail. Less real, but better.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
The appeal of Facebook is usually that you can have not real interactions with family. In fact you can cleverly avoid having any at all. Feature, not a bug.
The first thing that comes to your mind when someone brings up face-to-face family interaction is violent feuding? You may want to get that looked at.
Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
You can't learn "lessons" from a fictional story because it doesn't actually reflect reality; it reflects the fears and opinions of its author.
If you read a book written by a Luddite, you can't "learn the lesson that technology is bad", you simply acquire his prejudices and fears.
How did you manage to get all your buddies in the same room together?
By paying thousands of dollars per year for college.
And is there something preventing Facebook users from doing it?
Those who kept their Facebook accounts after graduation are not certain to have both the time and the money to go back for a master's.
"That the world would accept something like the Circle’s omnipresent software without debate, of course, is the most far-fetched of the book’s assumptions."
What?!? The world already has accepted something like the Circle. Those of us that don't use FB are very few and far between and get harangued as Luddites for not using it. To most of the twenty-somethings and younger, FB IS THE INTERNET.
We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
Thats (ahem...) like totally ultra mega hella bitchin rad.
We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
No, not at all. When you meet your internet friends in real life, that's when you make memories that last a lifetime. That's what is meant.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Yes, I have a normal family. What's your point? You expect a 50's evening TV family? Talk to someone who works in an ER sometime if you want real cynicism; heck, it's one of the reasons very few people have a long career in the ER: too much truth about human nature.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Blasphemer!
by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
I come from a family of heavy drinkers and fighters. Interestingly, and maybe because we are more southerly than northerly, we don't fight each other. I have seen guns pulled on uninvited guests, and once on someone walking down the street. Never saw anyone in my family fight with another member of the family. And no, there is no incestuous activities either.. we are not from that far south.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
Fuck Facebook, fuck Google, fuck all "social media", it's all bullshit and is ultimately used to invade your privacy; delete it all. People who claim to be your "friends" who won't be bothered to use other means to contact you weren't really your friends in the first place, so fuck them, too. Real friends will call you on the phone or at least send you an email.
Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
Those differences more or less define "real" is the thing. The mistake is confusing "real" with "preferable" IMO, but still real social interaction is required to reproduce the species and whatnot.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.