Slashdot Mirror
D-Link Router Backdoor Vulnerability Allows Full Access To Settings
StealthHunter writes "It turned out that just by setting a browsers user-agent to 'xmlset_roodkcableoj28840ybtide' anyone can remotely bypass all authentication on D-Link routers. It seems that thttpd was modified by Alphanetworks who inserted the backdoor. Unfortunately, vulnerable routers can be easily identified by services like shodanHQ. At least these models may have vulnerable firmware: DIR-100, DI-524, DI-524UP, DI-604S, DI-604UP, DI-604+, TM-G5240."
Are these people too stupid to know that eventually, somebody _will_ analyze their firmware and find this? I think it is time to make them liable for a bit more than the device when things like these get found. Say, 10x the new value of the device to any customer that wants to give it back.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
And the post points out (in 2010) that if you reverse the string it was "edit by 04882 Joel Backdoor" so it was clearly a backdoor.
The big scandal here is how can a backdoor be known since 2010 and not revealed??!!!
PDF link, published earlier this year, shows how many manufacturers use a stack with a UPnP vuln that gives root, even from the WAN side:
http://www.defensecode.com/public/DefenseCode_Broadcom_Security_Advisory.pdf
Point is, you probably weren't as safe as you thought you were, even before this new disclosure.
I think a huge problem with consumer-grade wifi routers today is that as manufacturers race to support new models with new wifi standards and new competitive feature sets, older models quickly become abandonware. There's very little guarantee around firmware updates for critical vulnerabilities, and end users are mostly oblivious to being at risk. By the time you pick up that $80 model from the store it's probably borderline EOL already.
The Beatings Will Continue... Until the Firmware Improves.
There is a systemic complete and total regard for basic tenets of security in nearly the entire home router/cpe market.
Start with crypto - no hwrng and a known "less than ideal" version of /dev/random to feed your "secure" wpa and ssh sessions.
Worse:
There is no privilege separation in most routers, which was ok when they were single function devices - BUT: not ok, when vulnerability via services like samba can be used to root most of the top 10 current home routers:
http://securityevaluators.com/content/case-studies/routers/soho_service_hacks.jsp
Once an attacker p0wns your home gateway they can change your dns to malicious sites, as dnschanger did:
http://www.dcwg.org/
or have it participate in botnets, or inflict further attacks on unsuspecting devices both inside and outside your firewall, or sniff your traffic - there is no security when your front door is left wide open.
What nearly every home router and cpe manufacturer is shipping is **rotware**, running 4-7 year old kernels with known CVEs, and 10 year old versions of critical services like dnsmasq. You'd think that new 802.11ac devices available for this christmas might have some modern software on it, but just to pick out a recent example - the "new" netgear nighthawk router runs Linux 2.6.36.4 and dnsmasq 2.15, according to their R7000 gpl code drop -
http://kb.netgear.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/2649
Brand new hardware - 4+ and 10 year old software respectively.
It's unfair of me to pick on Netgear, every router I've looked at this christmas season has some major issues.
Right now, the only current hope for decent security in home routers is in open, modern, and maintained firmware. And I wish the manufacturers (and ISPs, AND users, and governments) understood that, and there was (in particular) a sustainable model for continuous updates and upgrades as effective as android's in this market. I don't care if it came from taxation, isp fees, or built into the price of the device - would you willingly leave your networks' front door open if you understood the consequences?
Rotten routers with closed source code, and no maintenance, are a huge security risk, and they are holding back the ipv6 transition, (and nearly all current models have bufferbloat, besides)
How can the dysfunctional edge of the Internet be fixed?
Apparently IE might let you change the user agent
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6995311/how-can-i-spoof-the-user-agent-of-a-javascript-get-request
You'd just need to work in some cross domain exploit somehow... or have a subdomain of your website resolve to 192.168.1.1
s this the guy behind it? http://www.joesdata.com/executive/Joel_Liu_421313008.html Assuming good will, it seems like debugging code left in the final firmware release.
Regardless of how strong the evidence may be, uniquely identifying someone on the internet is dangerous and may even expose you to a slander/libel/defamation case. You may recall not long ago the witch hunt on reddit for the Boston Bomber. Over a dozen 'suspects' were named and shamed on the forums, none of whom turned out to be the actual person. Those people's lives crumbled into dust after, and police had to devote valuable resources at the time to protecting those individuals from vigilantes. Don't go the extra step of naming someone -- no matter how confident you are, the odds are very high that you're wrong. I know you think you're being edgy, smart, whatever and showing off your google-fu here, but you've actually rather accomplished the reverse -- you've demonstrated a reckless abandon and an inability to consider the consequences of your actions, or at least favoring momentary glory and recognition at the expense of another. Neither scores high marks in internet ethics.
On the internet, a loaded finger is a bigger threat than a loaded gun.
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
Remind me never to pick you as a team-mate for Trivial Pursuit.