Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Design Guru Urges Apple To End Cable Chaos

An anonymous reader writes "Nokia's former head designer has called on Apple to work with the broader technology industry and end its policy of having proprietary connectors for its device chargers and accessories. Other experts say Apple cannot continue to go it alone with Lightning Connectors and ignore Micro USB."

55 of 791 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, I totally agree... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Oh, I totally agree... With the slight difference that I actually think that the Lightning connector is actually better design. It's small and orientation less and rather robust. Micro-USB, while ubiquitous, is rather fragile and has orientation. It'd rather see all phone manufacturers switch to the Lightning connector instead. I know this won't happen, especially since the EU mandates Micro-USB.

    Oh, and before you accuse me of being an Apple fanboy. I'm still on a non-Lightning iPhone and if it wasn't my employer who paid for my phone, I wouldn't even have a smartphone.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by LordLucless · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know this won't happen, especially since the EU mandates Micro-USB.

      And even more especially because Apple has patented aspects of the Lightning connector, and have no intentions of sharing.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by remus.cursaru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because yes, a simple 4 contacts/4 wires cable is clearly inferior to a proprietary crap, with custom connector and single-manufacturer authentication chips lock-in.

    3. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not saying that proprietary is preferable. I'm saying that from the design, the lightning connector is better. That's if parent encumbered an proprietary doesn't mean that it can't be technically superior, right? In other words: it would be preferable to have an open connector with the hardware design characteristics of the lightning connector.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    4. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely. An open connector is preferable. Doesn't mean the Lightning connector isn't technically superior.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I agree. There definitely should be a standard connector for this kind of thing, but it should be something that doesn't suck. The old Apple Dock connectors had a lot more functionality than the newer lightning ones, but the connector was bit too big. A ubiquitous connector needs:
      • A future-proof data signal (e.g. Thunderbolt, which can carry a signal fast enough that it won't be obsolete within a couple of years of release), that doesn't need to be supported by endpoints but can be detected and used if it is.
      • A widely-supported legacy signal (e.g. USB) so that it works everywhere
      • A lightweight mechanism for negotiating power demands and capabilities between supply and device.
      • A physically sturdy connector, with a reference design of a socket that will stand at least 1,000 insertions and ideally 10,000 in normal use.
      • A connector that either has an orientation so obvious that no one could possibly plug it in the wrong way, or one that works in either orientation.
      • Any patents that cover the design must be licensed royalty free, so third parties can interface with it cheaply and easily.

      Neither microUSB nor Lightning meets these requirements. If Nokia wants to fix this, they should get together an industry group to design and agree to use such a connector. Don't complain at Apple, design a better connector than the Apple one, get everyone except Apple behind it, and market the hell out of it. Make every non-Apple phone have a big sticker on it saying that it supports the standard connector and list the features that make it better than the Apple one.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1000 Insertions is way to few. I connect my phone (for charging or data transfer, 2-3 times a day. It would be out of design spec in a year. I use my devices longer than that thank you. (Although in many I am capable of replacing the jack, most others are not).

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    7. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by neonsignal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference being that Apple makes it very difficult for third party manufacturers, while the USB consortium are keen to get broad industry support. For Apple the patent seems to be used to exclude competition, while the USB patent holders and USB manufacturers are engaged in reciprocal and royalty-free licensing arrangements.

      From a libre point of view, a patented standard is not the same as a patent-encumbered standard; the difference lies in the licencing.

    8. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by Trogre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Micro-USB, while ubiquitous, is rather fragile and has orientation.

      This.

      What complete muppet designed USB, a frequent plug-unplug connector by nature, to have orientation?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Informative

      they're friendly to ACCESSORY manufacturers.

      that's quite different from 3rd party hw manufacturers...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by JeffOwl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "...a fragile mess." What are you people doing to your phones? I've never had a micro USB connector fail, either in the cable or on the phone. Maybe I'm just lucky?

    11. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, "some company" does not own "the patent" on microUSB. USB was developed by an industry consortium to be a shared standard and, by design, no one company controls it.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    12. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm puzzled by complaints about fragility and having to be plugged in the right way. My last two phones and the one I have now had and have micro-USB. The cables outlasted the phones. OTOH, I've had a lot of those 1/8 inch audio jacks break. U wish they'd use RCA jacks on computers (it wouldn't work on a phone).

      I would guess that most problems with any plugs stem from users pulling them out holding the wire rather than the plug.

      USB itself will only plug in one way, polarized wall plugs only plug in one way, and I don't remember anyone bitching when they went from non-polarized to polarized wall plugs.

    13. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by TheP4st · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference being that Apple makes it very difficult for third party manufacturers

      On the contrary, they gladly help third party accessory while at the same time they lock out handset manufacturers as that's very effective a lock-in of their customer base. Someone that have spent USD300 on a Bose SoundDock are less likely to change to a different handset maker than they otherwise would be since a SoundDock without an iPhone/iPad it is just a very expensive paperweight.

      This customer lock in via third parties would evaporate the very instant that Apple gave other handset makers access to their proprietary connectors. And while Apple have equivalents to many of the third party accessories, it would not be possible for Apple to keep it all in-house as people want/need more variety on their accessories than Apple can and want to offer.

      Apple need 3rd party manufacturers more than 3rd party manufacturers need Apple.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    14. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There already is a standard. Apple is choosing to ignore it. That's sort of the whole point of this argument.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    15. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What complete muppet designed USB, a frequent plug-unplug connector by nature, to have orientation?

      It was the genius who understood the product requirements for a ubiquitous, low cost and robust connector.

      There are only two ways to avoid having orientation. You can have pins on both sides of the connector in a mirrored formation, or you can have a multiplexer in the device. Mirroring requires duplicate sets of pins, which means twice as many failure points and more PCB space dedicated to pads and signals instead of large anchor points to give the connector mechanical strength. It also increases cost. Multiplexers for high speed signals are not cheap either, and having a more complicated PCB layout for high speed signals also adds cost.

      Lightning works for Apple because their products are expensive. It isn't suitable as a universal connector for all manufacturers. The genius of Micro USB is that it is cheap but also robust (the cables are designed to break in order to save the connector, which is rated at 10k cycles minimum) and supports very high speed signals like MHI/HDMI which the Lightning connector does not.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is it technically superior? The low quality of video output over it compared with Micro USB suggests that it isn't universally "better".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by TheHonch · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why don't they standardize the audio jacks? Very confusing with the American 1/8 inch thing while we in Europe have a 3,5mm version

    18. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MicroUSB's orientation isn't the problem.

      The horrible part of the design is that the orientation is something you can only tell with good eyes in clear light.

      Why the hell you'd design a modern plug that way is beyond me.

      Bias: fine, sometimes necessary. I might even say its a preferable simple-physical solution to requiring everything using the plug to have the extra few-cents' worth of circuitry to switch around the pin that's taking in power before it burns out your system completely. FAR simpler to have an L-shape or right triangle or SOMETHING that I can feel for in the dark and plug in without wrecking either my cable or the device.

      --
      -Styopa
    19. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

      The plug itself incorporates a processor which detects the plug's orientation and routes the electrical signals to the correct pins. Official Lightning connectors contain an authentication chip that makes it difficult for third-party manufacturers to produce compatible accessories without being approved by Apple.

    20. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are only two ways to avoid having orientation. You can have pins on both sides of the connector in a mirrored formation, or you can have a multiplexer in the device.

      Actually, there's also a third way, commonly used in audio cables: Make the plug and all contacts rotationally symmetric. That strategy might not work well for the type of signal USB carries (I have no idea if it does), but in terms of being rotationally symmetric, it can't be beaten. You can even rotate the plug while plugging it in.

    21. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's actually not a passive cable, otherwise it wouldn't be rotation independent. It has an embedded chip that does all kinds of nasty things, including authorizing that the cable is made by Apple (or a licensed third party). Fortunately this chip can be bypassed: http://www.redmondpie.com/apple-lightning-authentication-chip-has-been-bypassed-third-party-lightning-cables-and-docks-on-their-way-video/

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    22. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by TheP4st · · Score: 5, Insightful

      effectively destroyed any "lock-in" that it commanded.

      Did they destroy it in favor of a design they do not own the rights to, or did the move from one design lock-in to another?

      Hint: Not very much happened that invalidate my argument.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    23. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Embedding a proprietary security chip in the cable so that the device can refuse to work with third party cables is helpful to third party manufacturers?

      That's one weird-ass definition of helpful you've got there.

    24. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by uglyduckling · · Score: 3, Informative

      So it didn't do video over Micro USB then.

    25. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by DrXym · · Score: 5, Informative

      Fixed that for you.

      You didn't fix it very well.

      There are at least 2 data protocols which will output video from micro-USB. MHL and Slimport (aka MyDP, mobile DisplayPort). Both can do 1080p60 output (i.e. FullHD and 3D), and aside from how they draw power, they work in a similar way to the end user - plug dongle into phone, plug HDMI cable into dongle, plug power (if applicable) into dongle, and play. Dongles start from $20 up.

    26. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by elp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And they couldn't put the chip in the device itself because? Ethernet has been doing this to avoid needing cross-over cables for years.

    27. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's an open design that has been in use for years in most phones with no trouble at all. Why would it need to be tested further? The marketplace has shown that it meets its goals.

    28. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by AC-x · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was developed to be the fragile single point of failure for all manufacturers.

      Actually micro-usb is designed to be more durable than previous USB designs by putting all moving parts on the cable instead of the socket, putting more wear on the cable instead of the socket.

      Micro-usb socket break off the board? You can blame manufacturer cost-cutting for that, the same thing would happen if they attached a lightning connector weakly too.

    29. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Informative

      - plug dongle into phone, plug HDMI cable into dongle, plug power (if applicable) into dongle, and play

      In no fucking way is that MicroUSB.

      It's MicroUSB+Dongle+HDMI cable+Power Cable.

      Where Lightning will do it all in just one cable. No dongles needed.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    30. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, Apple uses patents for what they're intended for - to keep competition at bay while capitalizing on their 'invention'. They developed their invention, they get to keep it. (off course that is before entering into a discussion on the MERIT of a patent which I personally think there is none in the field of mathematics (software) or science)

      The USB manufacturers use their patents to capitalize on standards. Every time you implement USB you got to pay a couple of cents to someone who is totally not involved in your design process simply because they bought somebody else's idea. It's perverse to think about it because if you do think up a similar solution, it's thoughtcrime. They didn't develop any hardware, they didn't think about it, they don't even sell you any hardware. USB patent holders and manufacturers are indeed in reciprocal arrangements because they ALL have similar patents and they are ALL infringing on each other, that's how ubiquitous and general these "inventions" and patents are that they rather not fight each other in endless court battles because they all know once they do, half their patent portfolio will be destroyed. But if you're not in the select group of patent holders or manufacturers, you don't get to benefit from these arrangements. You can't 3D print a USB-like connector because you're in violation of someone's patent, you have to buy them from a select number of manufacturers, if you're not big enough to fight them you're shit out of luck. But hey, it's a "standard", let's legalize these solutions so the oligopoly can raise the prices from cents to full dollars.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    31. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll tell you why this is so consumer-unfriendly. Sure, on the surface it seems convenient to re-use your chargers. But the state of the art now cannot change. What incentive does a manufacturer have to build a better connector? What if they had passed this stupid law in 2005, before micro-usb was invented? We'd be stuck with that horrible mini-usb port that only lasted for a couple thousand insertions by design.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by sootman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh please. It isn't *that* hard to make. Imagine a connector with 4 pins, doubled, viewed from above:
      1 2 3 4
      4 3 2 1
      You run a wire up, split it, then join the two 1s. Another wire goes up, splits, and joins the 2s. Etc.

      "Twice as many failure points" -- LOLOL. We're creating REDUNDANCY here. That's a GOOD thing. If one of the 4 pins in your USB connector breaks, you're fucked. If one of the 4 wires in a connector like I describe breaks, you put a dot with a marker on that side and remember that this connector only works one way now.

      The difference in PCB printing and other costs are marginal. You can buy a variety of more complicated cables from monoprice for $3 each -- these things literally cost pennies, or a dollar or so, in quantity. And the OEM only cares about shipping a cable with a $300 device, or selling individually for $20. Let the commodity cable companies go after the low-end.

      I'm not saying Apple's Lightning design is perfect but there's no reason not to make cables reversible. You're talking about something that gets used literally daily by hundreds of millions of people around the world. If automakers can afford to make keys that go both ways, electronics companies can make reversible cables. Design is all about compromise, but making a two-way connector isn't *that* big of a deal.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    33. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You run a wire up, split it, then join the two 1s. Another wire goes up, splits, and joins the 2s. Etc.

      Hi. I see you have never done any mechanical connector design so I'll explain how it works for you. The connectors need to be mountable on a PCB by flow/wave soldering. No wires, so that plan is out I'm afraid. I suppose you could add some to the connector itself, but that costs money. Ideally you want the connector to be made entirely out of stamped metal parts, like the Micro USB connector is.

      "Twice as many failure points" -- LOLOL. We're creating REDUNDANCY here.

      Redundancy as in "one side now shorts so, so both sides are broken". Pins bent out of shape and shorting is the most common failure mode of small pitch connectors like this. Again, this is well understood by people who design mechanical connectors.

      You can buy a variety of more complicated cables from monoprice for $3 each

      Micro USB connectors (PCB mount, the part that takes the strain) cost about 40c (Euro) for quality ones. Of course we have no idea how much lightning connectors cost, but I guarantee it's more. Might not sound like a lot but if a phone sells for 40 Euro retail then wholesale price will be about 20 Euro and BOM cost will be about 10 Euro, so that connector is maybe 4% of the total cost.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Re:What's their problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is a design that requires an authentication chip in the cable really superior? It doesn't protect you from unsafe cheap power supplies and means you have to buy these cables from Apple, or someone whom Apple has blessed with a license. I accept the physical design is safer, but why does it have to be proprietary?

  3. Re:What's their problem? by gigaherz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because Apple's cables are proprietary, and even contain a chip with the sole purpose to prevent third-parties from making their own. Apple overcharges users for the cables, while preventing the competition from building cheaper alternatives.

  4. Micro-usb 3.0 is so awful, Lightning makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reason for Lightning: see this hideous microUSB 3.0 cable what sort of shitty design is this? I know it's backwards compatible, but the USB standard was not future-proof as one can see from the picture, so it deserves to die.

  5. Re:European regulations by Amouth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple uses the charge port/connection for handling all of the accessories and controlling what goes on the market for their phones while also getting a nice chunk of change in licensing fees.

    If they are forced to comply with the European regulators, my bet is they will just add a micro USB-B port to the side of the device that is only connected for charging period while keeping their proprietary connector for everything it does now. I predict it will also be in an inconvenient location say the right side of the phone. And it may only be done for phones intended for orginal sale in Europe (although that is more dependant on sales volume their vs. supply chain cost/impact).

    Either way they are going to do their best to comply with the letter of the law, and keep every bit of their business model and revenue streams intact.

    I'd actually be willing to put money on this one,

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  6. Re:Where we're going, we don't need no stinkin cab by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

    How important are cables going to be when everything your phone does is wireless (including charging) ?

    I'm working on a design that lets me suck power out of people's phones on the train and transfer it into mine. I'll never need to charge again!!

    --
    No sig today...
  7. Re:I'm left to wonder, why not? by Andtalath · · Score: 4, Informative

    5-pin MHL adds video.
    11-pin MHL (samsung only atm unfortunately) adds OTG capabilities.

    The connector is awful though, no other usb cable type breaks as easily for me.

  8. Re:I'm left to wonder, why not? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unlike the Dock which contained a whole load of dedicated video and audio connectors, the Lightning connector's just an 8-pin connector that gets its video and docking capability from sending a digital stream that's interpreted further down the line. There's no a lot that Lightning can do that microUSB can't do by a similar system such as MHL.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  9. Re:What's their problem? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're asking for the rationale behind the EU charger harmonisation, it's waste. If every device uses the same charger then fewer chargers have to be manufactured and ultimately recycled. For example you never have to go out and buy a "spare" charger for your smartphone to keep at the office, or a replacement for the one you left behind on holiday, if you already have four mutually intercompatible chargers that originally came with different products.

    Of course whether that rationale makes any sense is up for debate but that's the logic.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  10. That's shocking by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only Apple fanbois want a connector that can double as a butt-plug

    A charging cable combined with a butt-plug! That's shocking!

  11. Yep by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Apple's issue really was that micro USB was too fragile, well they could have introduced a new, standard, connector to fix that. Design a "mobile USB" standard, that is durable, orients either way, integrates pins for HDMI, etc. Get it all nice n' designed and tested, then hand the design over to the USB Group, royalty free (like all USB standards). Particularly if it was going to be part of new Apple phones I don't imagine that there'd be a lot of resistance to adoption.

    The EU's mandate doesn't come from a love of micro-USB, but rather the need for a standard, whatever that is. Micro-USB is the best we've got and the most prevalent, so that is what they are going for. If there was a better one out there, particularly if you could show how increased durability could lead to longer life and less waste, I think it'd have a good chance of being the standard.

    However Apple has no interest in that at all. Their new connector wasn't made because micro-USB is so bad, it was made because Apple desires to be the only place you buy Apple accessories.

    1. Re:Yep by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree, the micro USB connector is a mediocre design at best.

      As compared to?

      they do not sit firmly in the socket

      all of mine do. in fact, I often have devices hanging by these connections. I wonder how many cellphones are hanging from uUSB connectors worldwide right now? I'll bet it's at least in the thousands.

      and micro USB connectors have a tendency to break off the little plastic contact plate inside the socket

      Contact plate? You mean the blade?

      There is nothing more annoying than to have an expensive USB device bricked by a broken micro USB socket

      Nothing?

      There are actually devices with micro USB sockets that are so crappy you can push the micro USB connector into them up-side-down.

      I've never seen one. Stop buying the cheapest possible shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Yep by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hanging devices by connectors? Sounds like a terrible storage solution.

      So just to be clear, you complained that the cables have poor retention, which is bullshit, but you don't actually care if the cables have poor retention, you just wanted something to complain about so you made something up? Got it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Obligatory xkcd by pne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Nokia wants to fix this, they should get together an industry group to design and agree to use such a connector

    XKCD tells you about what happens when you promote a new standard to supersede previous ones.

    --
    Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    1. Re:Obligatory xkcd by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is slashdot, there is no need for a descriptive link. Just say "xkcd 927".

    2. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Walterk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      xkcd 301

  13. You keep using that word... by sirwired · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Other experts say Apple cannot continue to go it alone"

    Cannot. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

  14. Re:Frank Nuovo by sphealey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nokia. Nokia. Where have I been reading about Nokia lately? Oh yeah, that was the world-dominating handset company whose senior team decided in 2007 that the Apple iPhone was not a serious threat to their existing business. And a few years later killed their potentially iPhone-competitive product line. Good source of techno-business insight without a doubt.

    sPh

  15. Re:Sure. by FireFury03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because nobody will every try to make another new kind of USB connector.

    There's a difference between "the existing standard connector doesn't have the features we need, so we will colleborate with the rest of the industry and design a new connector for everyone to use" and "the existing standard connector is unsuitable*, so we will develop our own connector and patent the hell out of it so no one can ever be compatible".

    (* Why Apple thought the micro USB connector is unsuitable is debatable... many suspect it was considered unsuitable *because* they couldn't patent the hell out of it).

  16. Re:First world problems. by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Usually those extra accessories will try to take advantage of a unique feature in the phone, so even if the cable fits it doesn't mean the software will work with it.

    USB is a standard. The USB on my kyocera will work on your HTC. That's what STANDARD means. "Sticking it to the Americans" is just stupid. Remember, Google's Nexus uses the same STANDARD mini-USB as everyone else's phones... except Apple, who seem to be taking a page from Microsoft's playbook.

    Introducing the iLamp (requires iBulbs). See the problem?

  17. Re:First world problems. by AC-x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of these phones become obsolete before the need a new cable. Usually those extra accessories will try to take advantage of a unique feature in the phone, so even if the cable fits it doesn't mean the software will work with it.

    Bullshit, every single usb charger I've ever owned has worked with every single non-Apple usb device without any issues. The whole point of this standard is so that every phone does work, hassle free, with every charger (in fact the only devices I've seen complain about usb charging are Apple devices, go figure).

    Also just because almost all phones come with a charger doesn't mean you won't need to either replace it or buy a 2nd charger, and if you had a previous phone you already have a perfectly good 2nd charger with no need to buy another one because your new phone is incompatible.

    You know what? I count being able to borrow anyone at work's usb charging cable and have it work on my usb phone as a good thing.

    The EU Law on this is just one of their Lets just find a way to stick it to the Americans law, because they had a fit that Apple took over Nokia lead.

    Or maybe the EU cares about doing what's good for consumers and not just what's good for the company that pays them the most money.

    If Apple "needs" a proprietary connector then they can put both a micro-usb connector and their expensive proprietary DRMd cable.

  18. Re:First world problems. by AC-x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    in america we believe in something called private enterprise. where people can make products and sell them.

    Rubbish, the US has plenty of standards. Would you like to see every home and apartment have its own proprietary mains power sockets? Every car manufacturer have its own type of filling nozzle? Every wi-fi router require a proprietary wi-fi adapter? Every TV and DVD player have its own proprietary video connector? No, I didn't think so. Why should phones be any different?

    Remember that this was the free market's answer to phone charging, the EU decided that it was in citizens interests that a standard be set up so we don't have to deal with endless proprietary cables any more.