Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Design Guru Urges Apple To End Cable Chaos

An anonymous reader writes "Nokia's former head designer has called on Apple to work with the broader technology industry and end its policy of having proprietary connectors for its device chargers and accessories. Other experts say Apple cannot continue to go it alone with Lightning Connectors and ignore Micro USB."

38 of 791 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, I totally agree... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Oh, I totally agree... With the slight difference that I actually think that the Lightning connector is actually better design. It's small and orientation less and rather robust. Micro-USB, while ubiquitous, is rather fragile and has orientation. It'd rather see all phone manufacturers switch to the Lightning connector instead. I know this won't happen, especially since the EU mandates Micro-USB.

    Oh, and before you accuse me of being an Apple fanboy. I'm still on a non-Lightning iPhone and if it wasn't my employer who paid for my phone, I wouldn't even have a smartphone.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by LordLucless · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know this won't happen, especially since the EU mandates Micro-USB.

      And even more especially because Apple has patented aspects of the Lightning connector, and have no intentions of sharing.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by remus.cursaru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because yes, a simple 4 contacts/4 wires cable is clearly inferior to a proprietary crap, with custom connector and single-manufacturer authentication chips lock-in.

    3. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not saying that proprietary is preferable. I'm saying that from the design, the lightning connector is better. That's if parent encumbered an proprietary doesn't mean that it can't be technically superior, right? In other words: it would be preferable to have an open connector with the hardware design characteristics of the lightning connector.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    4. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely. An open connector is preferable. Doesn't mean the Lightning connector isn't technically superior.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by neonsignal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference being that Apple makes it very difficult for third party manufacturers, while the USB consortium are keen to get broad industry support. For Apple the patent seems to be used to exclude competition, while the USB patent holders and USB manufacturers are engaged in reciprocal and royalty-free licensing arrangements.

      From a libre point of view, a patented standard is not the same as a patent-encumbered standard; the difference lies in the licencing.

    6. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by Trogre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Micro-USB, while ubiquitous, is rather fragile and has orientation.

      This.

      What complete muppet designed USB, a frequent plug-unplug connector by nature, to have orientation?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    7. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Informative

      they're friendly to ACCESSORY manufacturers.

      that's quite different from 3rd party hw manufacturers...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by JeffOwl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "...a fragile mess." What are you people doing to your phones? I've never had a micro USB connector fail, either in the cable or on the phone. Maybe I'm just lucky?

    9. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, "some company" does not own "the patent" on microUSB. USB was developed by an industry consortium to be a shared standard and, by design, no one company controls it.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    10. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm puzzled by complaints about fragility and having to be plugged in the right way. My last two phones and the one I have now had and have micro-USB. The cables outlasted the phones. OTOH, I've had a lot of those 1/8 inch audio jacks break. U wish they'd use RCA jacks on computers (it wouldn't work on a phone).

      I would guess that most problems with any plugs stem from users pulling them out holding the wire rather than the plug.

      USB itself will only plug in one way, polarized wall plugs only plug in one way, and I don't remember anyone bitching when they went from non-polarized to polarized wall plugs.

    11. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by TheP4st · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference being that Apple makes it very difficult for third party manufacturers

      On the contrary, they gladly help third party accessory while at the same time they lock out handset manufacturers as that's very effective a lock-in of their customer base. Someone that have spent USD300 on a Bose SoundDock are less likely to change to a different handset maker than they otherwise would be since a SoundDock without an iPhone/iPad it is just a very expensive paperweight.

      This customer lock in via third parties would evaporate the very instant that Apple gave other handset makers access to their proprietary connectors. And while Apple have equivalents to many of the third party accessories, it would not be possible for Apple to keep it all in-house as people want/need more variety on their accessories than Apple can and want to offer.

      Apple need 3rd party manufacturers more than 3rd party manufacturers need Apple.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    12. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What complete muppet designed USB, a frequent plug-unplug connector by nature, to have orientation?

      It was the genius who understood the product requirements for a ubiquitous, low cost and robust connector.

      There are only two ways to avoid having orientation. You can have pins on both sides of the connector in a mirrored formation, or you can have a multiplexer in the device. Mirroring requires duplicate sets of pins, which means twice as many failure points and more PCB space dedicated to pads and signals instead of large anchor points to give the connector mechanical strength. It also increases cost. Multiplexers for high speed signals are not cheap either, and having a more complicated PCB layout for high speed signals also adds cost.

      Lightning works for Apple because their products are expensive. It isn't suitable as a universal connector for all manufacturers. The genius of Micro USB is that it is cheap but also robust (the cables are designed to break in order to save the connector, which is rated at 10k cycles minimum) and supports very high speed signals like MHI/HDMI which the Lightning connector does not.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MicroUSB's orientation isn't the problem.

      The horrible part of the design is that the orientation is something you can only tell with good eyes in clear light.

      Why the hell you'd design a modern plug that way is beyond me.

      Bias: fine, sometimes necessary. I might even say its a preferable simple-physical solution to requiring everything using the plug to have the extra few-cents' worth of circuitry to switch around the pin that's taking in power before it burns out your system completely. FAR simpler to have an L-shape or right triangle or SOMETHING that I can feel for in the dark and plug in without wrecking either my cable or the device.

      --
      -Styopa
    14. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

      The plug itself incorporates a processor which detects the plug's orientation and routes the electrical signals to the correct pins. Official Lightning connectors contain an authentication chip that makes it difficult for third-party manufacturers to produce compatible accessories without being approved by Apple.

    15. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by TheP4st · · Score: 5, Insightful

      effectively destroyed any "lock-in" that it commanded.

      Did they destroy it in favor of a design they do not own the rights to, or did the move from one design lock-in to another?

      Hint: Not very much happened that invalidate my argument.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    16. Re: Oh, I totally agree... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Embedding a proprietary security chip in the cable so that the device can refuse to work with third party cables is helpful to third party manufacturers?

      That's one weird-ass definition of helpful you've got there.

    17. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by DrXym · · Score: 5, Informative

      Fixed that for you.

      You didn't fix it very well.

      There are at least 2 data protocols which will output video from micro-USB. MHL and Slimport (aka MyDP, mobile DisplayPort). Both can do 1080p60 output (i.e. FullHD and 3D), and aside from how they draw power, they work in a similar way to the end user - plug dongle into phone, plug HDMI cable into dongle, plug power (if applicable) into dongle, and play. Dongles start from $20 up.

    18. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by elp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And they couldn't put the chip in the device itself because? Ethernet has been doing this to avoid needing cross-over cables for years.

    19. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Informative

      - plug dongle into phone, plug HDMI cable into dongle, plug power (if applicable) into dongle, and play

      In no fucking way is that MicroUSB.

      It's MicroUSB+Dongle+HDMI cable+Power Cable.

      Where Lightning will do it all in just one cable. No dongles needed.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    20. Re:Oh, I totally agree... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You run a wire up, split it, then join the two 1s. Another wire goes up, splits, and joins the 2s. Etc.

      Hi. I see you have never done any mechanical connector design so I'll explain how it works for you. The connectors need to be mountable on a PCB by flow/wave soldering. No wires, so that plan is out I'm afraid. I suppose you could add some to the connector itself, but that costs money. Ideally you want the connector to be made entirely out of stamped metal parts, like the Micro USB connector is.

      "Twice as many failure points" -- LOLOL. We're creating REDUNDANCY here.

      Redundancy as in "one side now shorts so, so both sides are broken". Pins bent out of shape and shorting is the most common failure mode of small pitch connectors like this. Again, this is well understood by people who design mechanical connectors.

      You can buy a variety of more complicated cables from monoprice for $3 each

      Micro USB connectors (PCB mount, the part that takes the strain) cost about 40c (Euro) for quality ones. Of course we have no idea how much lightning connectors cost, but I guarantee it's more. Might not sound like a lot but if a phone sells for 40 Euro retail then wholesale price will be about 20 Euro and BOM cost will be about 10 Euro, so that connector is maybe 4% of the total cost.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Re:What's their problem? by gigaherz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because Apple's cables are proprietary, and even contain a chip with the sole purpose to prevent third-parties from making their own. Apple overcharges users for the cables, while preventing the competition from building cheaper alternatives.

  3. Micro-usb 3.0 is so awful, Lightning makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reason for Lightning: see this hideous microUSB 3.0 cable what sort of shitty design is this? I know it's backwards compatible, but the USB standard was not future-proof as one can see from the picture, so it deserves to die.

  4. Re:European regulations by Amouth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple uses the charge port/connection for handling all of the accessories and controlling what goes on the market for their phones while also getting a nice chunk of change in licensing fees.

    If they are forced to comply with the European regulators, my bet is they will just add a micro USB-B port to the side of the device that is only connected for charging period while keeping their proprietary connector for everything it does now. I predict it will also be in an inconvenient location say the right side of the phone. And it may only be done for phones intended for orginal sale in Europe (although that is more dependant on sales volume their vs. supply chain cost/impact).

    Either way they are going to do their best to comply with the letter of the law, and keep every bit of their business model and revenue streams intact.

    I'd actually be willing to put money on this one,

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  5. Re:Where we're going, we don't need no stinkin cab by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

    How important are cables going to be when everything your phone does is wireless (including charging) ?

    I'm working on a design that lets me suck power out of people's phones on the train and transfer it into mine. I'll never need to charge again!!

    --
    No sig today...
  6. Re:I'm left to wonder, why not? by Andtalath · · Score: 4, Informative

    5-pin MHL adds video.
    11-pin MHL (samsung only atm unfortunately) adds OTG capabilities.

    The connector is awful though, no other usb cable type breaks as easily for me.

  7. Re:I'm left to wonder, why not? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unlike the Dock which contained a whole load of dedicated video and audio connectors, the Lightning connector's just an 8-pin connector that gets its video and docking capability from sending a digital stream that's interpreted further down the line. There's no a lot that Lightning can do that microUSB can't do by a similar system such as MHL.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  8. Re:What's their problem? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're asking for the rationale behind the EU charger harmonisation, it's waste. If every device uses the same charger then fewer chargers have to be manufactured and ultimately recycled. For example you never have to go out and buy a "spare" charger for your smartphone to keep at the office, or a replacement for the one you left behind on holiday, if you already have four mutually intercompatible chargers that originally came with different products.

    Of course whether that rationale makes any sense is up for debate but that's the logic.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  9. That's shocking by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only Apple fanbois want a connector that can double as a butt-plug

    A charging cable combined with a butt-plug! That's shocking!

  10. Yep by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Apple's issue really was that micro USB was too fragile, well they could have introduced a new, standard, connector to fix that. Design a "mobile USB" standard, that is durable, orients either way, integrates pins for HDMI, etc. Get it all nice n' designed and tested, then hand the design over to the USB Group, royalty free (like all USB standards). Particularly if it was going to be part of new Apple phones I don't imagine that there'd be a lot of resistance to adoption.

    The EU's mandate doesn't come from a love of micro-USB, but rather the need for a standard, whatever that is. Micro-USB is the best we've got and the most prevalent, so that is what they are going for. If there was a better one out there, particularly if you could show how increased durability could lead to longer life and less waste, I think it'd have a good chance of being the standard.

    However Apple has no interest in that at all. Their new connector wasn't made because micro-USB is so bad, it was made because Apple desires to be the only place you buy Apple accessories.

  11. You keep using that word... by sirwired · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Other experts say Apple cannot continue to go it alone"

    Cannot. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

  12. Re:Obligatory xkcd by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is slashdot, there is no need for a descriptive link. Just say "xkcd 927".

  13. Re:Frank Nuovo by sphealey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nokia. Nokia. Where have I been reading about Nokia lately? Oh yeah, that was the world-dominating handset company whose senior team decided in 2007 that the Apple iPhone was not a serious threat to their existing business. And a few years later killed their potentially iPhone-competitive product line. Good source of techno-business insight without a doubt.

    sPh

  14. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Walterk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    xkcd 301

  15. Re:Sure. by FireFury03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because nobody will every try to make another new kind of USB connector.

    There's a difference between "the existing standard connector doesn't have the features we need, so we will colleborate with the rest of the industry and design a new connector for everyone to use" and "the existing standard connector is unsuitable*, so we will develop our own connector and patent the hell out of it so no one can ever be compatible".

    (* Why Apple thought the micro USB connector is unsuitable is debatable... many suspect it was considered unsuitable *because* they couldn't patent the hell out of it).

  16. Re:First world problems. by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Usually those extra accessories will try to take advantage of a unique feature in the phone, so even if the cable fits it doesn't mean the software will work with it.

    USB is a standard. The USB on my kyocera will work on your HTC. That's what STANDARD means. "Sticking it to the Americans" is just stupid. Remember, Google's Nexus uses the same STANDARD mini-USB as everyone else's phones... except Apple, who seem to be taking a page from Microsoft's playbook.

    Introducing the iLamp (requires iBulbs). See the problem?

  17. Re:First world problems. by AC-x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of these phones become obsolete before the need a new cable. Usually those extra accessories will try to take advantage of a unique feature in the phone, so even if the cable fits it doesn't mean the software will work with it.

    Bullshit, every single usb charger I've ever owned has worked with every single non-Apple usb device without any issues. The whole point of this standard is so that every phone does work, hassle free, with every charger (in fact the only devices I've seen complain about usb charging are Apple devices, go figure).

    Also just because almost all phones come with a charger doesn't mean you won't need to either replace it or buy a 2nd charger, and if you had a previous phone you already have a perfectly good 2nd charger with no need to buy another one because your new phone is incompatible.

    You know what? I count being able to borrow anyone at work's usb charging cable and have it work on my usb phone as a good thing.

    The EU Law on this is just one of their Lets just find a way to stick it to the Americans law, because they had a fit that Apple took over Nokia lead.

    Or maybe the EU cares about doing what's good for consumers and not just what's good for the company that pays them the most money.

    If Apple "needs" a proprietary connector then they can put both a micro-usb connector and their expensive proprietary DRMd cable.

  18. Re:First world problems. by AC-x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    in america we believe in something called private enterprise. where people can make products and sell them.

    Rubbish, the US has plenty of standards. Would you like to see every home and apartment have its own proprietary mains power sockets? Every car manufacturer have its own type of filling nozzle? Every wi-fi router require a proprietary wi-fi adapter? Every TV and DVD player have its own proprietary video connector? No, I didn't think so. Why should phones be any different?

    Remember that this was the free market's answer to phone charging, the EU decided that it was in citizens interests that a standard be set up so we don't have to deal with endless proprietary cables any more.