Slashdot Mirror


NSA Scraping Buddy Lists and Address Books From Live Internet Traffic

Charliemopps writes that the Washington Post reports "The NSA is collecting hundreds of millions of contact lists from all over the world, many of them belonging to Americans. The intercept them from instant messaging services as they move across global data links. The NSA is gathering contact lists in large numbers that amount to a sizable fraction of the world's e-mail and instant messaging accounts." According to the leaked document (original as a PDF), the NSA is intercepting some chat protocols and at least IMAP, and then analyzing the data for buddy list information and inbox contents.

188 comments

  1. Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Noryungi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Host your own email server on a Pi. Encrypt everything. Go back to Fidonet or even to snail mail.

    I am in the process of doing just that.

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by oobayly · · Score: 1

      It's not a bad idea - I'm pondering doing the same (albeit with a more powerful machine) for a range of domains I have. The reason being it's a bitch to migrate the email when changing providers rather than NSA monitoring.

      However, it's a problem when you ISP implements carrier-grade NAT or doesn't allow incoming connections on TCP 25.You could use their MX server and then use something like fetchmail to pull down new mail (we used to do that before hosting our own MX server), but that of course leaves you relying on a 3rd party which will drop their trousers on request.

    2. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Then use submission ports if your ISP blocks 25. Most ISPs I've found don't block them, even if they block port 25.

    3. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Why would that help when they're intercepting the email traffic itself?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by oobayly · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that to receive inbound public mail, TCP 25 had to be used.

    5. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Automatic encryption of all mails, isn't that what he is suggesting?

    6. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by rasmusbr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Great idea, now all we need is to found a nation based on Raspberry Pi ownership and/or the ability to host your own servers for email and other communication, outlaw communication with foreigners, and then we should be all set!

      The world could really use someone or some corporation with lots of resources and no ties to government to fund, and fund indefinitely, an effort at remaking the internet from the ground up. I just can't think of who or what that someone is.

      Trying to do it yourself is pointless.

    7. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can't brain today.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    8. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Go back to Fidonet...

      Riiight! Because the NSA can't decode modem traffic.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Won't help. The data still traverses the NSA monitored infrastructure. Unless you are laying your own cable, your data's being intercepted.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      I agree that doing it yourself is pointless but not hopeless. The internet has lost it's goal
      of routing around failures. We should try to move to a decentralized internet. The simplest
      and easiest way to do this is with sharing wifi routers. Most people in a city can see
      multiple wifi routers. If the routers all talked to each other and shared bandwidth then you
      have dozens of paths to the internet. This could even be expanded to cars. While
      driving on the highway there is typically a string of cars stretching from your car all the way
      back to your house. If each of these cars had a router in it you could just hop from car to
      car all the way back to your house or all the way across the nation on any major highway.
      We need to work on decentralized grid routers to completely remove the internet from any
      one entity's control.

    11. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Pi1grim · · Score: 1

      And that, kids, is what encryption is for.

    12. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sneakernet is an option, but then that runs up against the whole "no reasonable expectation of privacy in public" thing.

    13. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

      Encrypt everything.

      Indeed. Self-signed SSL certs are going to take on a whole new purpose now since the NSA doesn't hold your CA cert.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    14. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by N0Man74 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As long as you don't transfer your data through sneakernet stored on your phone in the 44 states that allow this without a warrant...

      http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/18983-police-can-search-your-phone-without-a-warrant

    15. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't encrypt the recipient addresses...

    16. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wear a ski mask when you go outside.

    17. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by stridebird · · Score: 1

      So was I. You can't specify the port number in an MX record.

    18. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by stridebird · · Score: 1

      And that, kids, is what encryption is for.

      ...and onion routing, kids.

    19. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      In theory you could use name@server.com:port, but I don't imagine most mail software would be happy to parse that.

    20. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      True. But ten thousand bedroom tinkerers and enthusiast coders working together could be a force of some capability.

      I'm not a good enough coder to make much, so I do my part by shamelessly plugging Retroshare to everyone. It's a really nice program. Encrypted IM software, fully decentralised. Crypto that, while the NSA might get through, will certainly make them work for it. Plus a good file-sharing capability, mail, even distributed forums. All based on public-key authentication of your contacts, and never communicating with anyone you havn't swapped keys with.

      There are other hopeful projects. The Piratebox people could really use some more work, and if you can get enough physically-local friends together there is a lot of potential in mesh networking if only there were enough of a population density of enthusiasts to get more started.

    21. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Mesh networking. It's good, but doesn't scale infinitely. If you're looking at re-decentralising the internet, it's going to have to be part of the solution, but not everything.

      I hold some hope for content-addressible networks and distributed caches. They could handle the bulk distribution of data very effectively, greatly reducing the demand on any mesh network and rendering it more practical.

    22. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      And yet Firefox will still scream blue murder if you so much as attempt to open a https page with a self signed cert.

      More and more, I wonder about the real reasons behinds Mozilla's decision to declare an encrypted web off bounds.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    23. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I'm sure uucp is still around. My earliest "Internet" feed was new and mail and news feeds over UUCap. Bring back bang paths and modems!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    24. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      Enthusiasm is a great start, but enthusiasm alone has a divisive effect on groups of intelligent and creative people. You get lots of little groups going off and inventing incompatible stuff.

      Cash has a cohesive effect on groups of intelligent and creative people. With cash you can get people to work in the same direction even though they'd prefer to work on their pet projects.

      There are probably some exceptions to the rule where people stick together and focus on a single project, but I bet most of them also have cash rewards in some indirect form.

    25. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that, kids, is what encryption is for.

      ...and onion routing, kids.

      They're supposedly getting better at identifying specific users...

    26. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Guess what everyone who these bozos should be spying on is already doing. Has been for a long time.

      What sucks and blows about the whole deal is that their whole effort not only invades the lives of millions, if not billions, of innocent people, it doesn't even come close to accomplishing its alleged goal.

      If you think terrorists are by definition dumb, think again. Terrorists work like any kind of decentralized, illegal groups. There is not "THE terrorists", rather think of them like you would of, say, drug rings or human trafficking rings. Not a single one, but many, independent ones. And yes, you will catch the dumb ones.

      But, frankly, who are you more concerned with, a smart or a dumb criminal?

      But the dumb ones that can be an are being caught are touted as the great success while the smart ones are happily continuing their "work", and everyone involved is happy. The criminals, because they can keep up their work without too much hassle (because the police sees its efforts creating "results" so they won't up the ante to catch them, too), the police (because they keep their funding due to the "results" they create), the only one losing is those that pay for the whole show without getting much out of it: us.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, but assigning random addresses (or aliases, rather) and having people use them would.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't know about your country, but in mine they cannot force you to fork over the pin number. So the first thing when the police comes knocking is to turn your cell off or simply remove the battery pack.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer black bar glasses (google them if you don't know what I mean). Sends a more ... comprehensive message.

      I still say a flash mob of a few hundred people using them in an area well known to be under CCTV surveillance would be quite neat. Especially if repeated globally.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      and that again is why we use encryption. they can slurp up the encrypted true-crypt container and hack at it for the next thousand years for all I care. Or you could use a easily concealable sd or microsd card.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    31. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Go back to Fidonet

      That's actually a viable option.

      In a lot of places where the internet is firewalled, monitored, etc (basically everywhere), a lot of people used fidonet to send messages out because the censors never investigated that traffic - they monitor your email, but not your modem.

      So for a lot of people (and journalists and all that), fidonet really is the network of freedom because it's the only valid way out.

    32. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's a great idea, but can it be done? Even if connections over the large number of hops inherent in such a system were acceptable, is existing consumer-grade hardware capable of running BGP with reasonable performance and storing the (extra large!) routing tables necessary?

      In fact, given that routing tables grow exponentially, is it even theoretically possible for a full peer-to-peer Internet scale mesh to work?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    33. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A spoofed certificate can trigger a similar (or the same?) warning...

    34. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Ingenium13 · · Score: 1

      Just add your self-signed root CA to the browser. I have a root CA I use to sign all my certs, and I add the root to my laptop, servers, and mobile devices. That way they validate.

    35. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >
      > In fact, given that routing tables grow exponentially, is it even theoretically possible for a full peer-to-peer Internet scale mesh to work?
      >

      If current routing tables can't scale then maybe a different type of routing table or a different solution entirely is needed.
      For instance if every router was location aware and knew it's geographic location and the geographic location of the place it was
      trying to reach it could send the encrypted packet in the general direction with the knowledge that each node would get it
      one step physically closer to it's destination. Large hops is still a problem but large hops is really only a problem with stuff
      that needs to be close to real-time. For email this isn't really much of a problem as even a 5-10 minute delay or longer isn't
      really a big deal.

    36. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Yaur · · Score: 1

      citation? I don't see anything in rfc 2822 or 5321 that would allow that.

    37. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by kylemonger · · Score: 1

      Lucky you. In my country if you reach into your pockets when a cop approaches, you're likely as not to get a gun drawn on you, and if you keep digging, 9mm slugs will soon be thudding into your body.

    38. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Except a lot of modem traffic is now.... IP traffic somewhere along its path. So unless you encrypt it, with known good keys and crypto algorithms, you're still not secure.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    39. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      For instance if every router was location aware and knew it's geographic location and the geographic location of the place it was trying to reach it could send the encrypted packet in the general direction with the knowledge that each node would get it one step physically closer to it's destination.

      That's essentially equivalent to introducing a hierarchy. You're just basing your hierarchy on geographic location, and making it implicit instead of explicit. It may not be a bad idea, but it doesn't count as a solution for the problem I mentioned (which presupposes that you don't want to introduce a hierarchy).

      Large hops is still a problem but large hops is really only a problem with stuff that needs to be close to real-time. For email this isn't really much of a problem as even a 5-10 minute delay or longer isn't really a big deal.

      Consider them in the aggregate: it's not just that each packet traverses more routers, it's that each router has to route more packets. If you double the average number of hops in your network, you also double the load on the network.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    40. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It'd be a standards-defiling abomination.

    41. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      And that, kids, is what encryption is for.

      Yeah, but aren't the sender and receiver unencrypted? I haven't bothered to read the article, but it shouldn't be hard to build up this info by scraping the envelopes.

      Similarly, even if the contents are encrypted, they can still see what the IMAP server says when it gives you a list of subjects.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    42. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Ignore comments about IMAP where that traffic is encrypted. No idea what percentage that is.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    43. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by antdude · · Score: 1

      Uh, NSA can do dial-up phone lines and check snail mails too.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    44. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by matthewv789 · · Score: 2

      This is an excellent point.

      The browser vendors are operating on the assumption that when you want https, you want to trust that you know who you're talking to, and so they warn the heck out of you when they deem your connection susceptible to a man-in-the-middle attack. They also assume that a certificate properly signed for the exact domain name by a CA is good, and anything else is bad. And overall this is a good idea. Sort of.

      But there are a few problems with this theory:

      1. 1. Most people really do not notice or understand the difference between http and https, and even if they do, they don't clearly switch from thinking "I'm broadcasting everything I do over the web for anyone to see and hear so I'm very careful about what I say or do" to "cool, I'm secure, I can do whatever I want and nobody will ever know". Giving warnings for https connections with certain certificate problems gives the impression that those connections are akin to the "malware sites" your browser also warns you away from, and far worse than a regular old non-encrypted http connection. Which leads us to...
      2. 2. Gives a false sense of security when using the LEAST secure mode of browsing the web: regular old unencrypted HTTP. No warnings there.
      3. 3. 99+% of the time, a site with a certificate problem is just sloppily run, not a sign of an actual MITM attack. Getting content from images.mydomain.com but certificate singed for www.mydomain.com? This should not be getting such a huge warning, if any. Even a totally different domain is usually a sign of a CDN, hosting provider certificate, parent or affiliated company name, etc. Certificate expired last week? Um, sure, why a big warning about this? Even a self-signed certificate is almost never actually a sign of MITM. In addition, these dire warnings are so apocalyptic that they steer both users and site owners away from https unless it's really necessary, because it can be kind of a pain to get everything right (and renew the certificate on time every year, etc.), so they'd rather just avoid the hassle.
      4. 4. Gives a false sense of security even when the certificate IS properly signed... the NSA/FBI/etc. can make legit signed certificates with US Government intermediate signing certificates, courtesy of VeriSign (as can thousands of other entities around the world who hold intermediate signing certificates, of which there is no public registry saying who they all are...). That is, if they haven't stolen/cajoled the site's actual certificates already...

      I have no problem with them clearly communicating that some certificates are much more prone to MITM attacks than others, but I have a serious problem with making it seem like those certificate problems are worse than regular old plaintext HTTP, or akin to trying to visit a malware-laden site.

    45. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

      Don't know about your country, but in mine they cannot force you to fork over the pin number. So the first thing when the police comes knocking is to turn your cell off or simply remove the battery pack.

      They covered this in the article that I linked, that you are replying to....

      From the article I linked:

      "If you think a password lock will keep your content secure, think again. Major phone manufacturers will generally help police officers with tricks to get around the passcodes."

    46. Re:Raspberry Pi to the rescue! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I guess that's the difference between a democracy and a republic, eh? :)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am so sick of hearing this idea that just because I am not a citizen of the USA then somehow I have less rights to privacy.

    1. Re:Foreigners by Noryungi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then do something about it and stop using US-based web services.

      --
      The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    2. Re:Foreigners by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have *less* rights to privacy than a USA citizen? In this case of privacy is there a number less than zero?

      The USA citizen that has no special associations is a peon, pal. We're in the same boat.

    3. Re:Foreigners by Noryungi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess your privacy zero when the Secret Police comes up to your door to arrest you in the middle of the night.

      This has happened before, in Europe and in many other countries around the globe.

      Funny thing is, the Secret Police was often financed, equipped and trained by the CIA.

      --
      The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    4. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Somehow, those that defend the idea foreigners have no human rights in the United States don't seem to understand that if it were true, they would also have no rights when visiting other countries.

    5. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      *cough* XKeyscore is a joint program with Australia and New Zealand.

      *cough XKeyscore has been used extensively by the German intelligence agences BND and BfV (that's foreign AND domestic intelligence agencies).

      But tell us again all about how big bad America is the only one doing this.

    6. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your country's laws ostensibly protect you in some nominal way. That at least gives you some recourse. As a dirty foreigner, your country's laws don't give two shits about how much of my privacy is infringed.

    7. Re:Foreigners by Aguazul2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then do something about it and stop using US-based web services.

      Also European and Australian ones, in fact any web services that are in a country where there is an NSA-affiliated tap point, or where your traffic crosses one of those countries. In fact, if you are a 'foreigner' best disconnect completely and go live in a cave -- but not one dug by the CIA because then you're a terrorist and we will send drones.

    8. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. Why should the US gov't care about your privacy? You are not a citizen and aren't provided any special rights by the US gov't. I don't log into Chinese, French, German, or Russian websites and whine about their surveillance activities (pro-tip: they're all doing it too)

      The intelligence agencies mandate is to conduct surveillance. This isn't news. The problem arises when they over-reach that mandate and violate the rights provided by our own Constitution. At that point, the citizens of this country should be raising their hands and saying: "Uh...guys? Whose side are you on?".

    9. Re:Foreigners by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Well...from a realpolitik viewpoint...you do. Countries are only interested in protecting their own (f*ck the world...and their allies), and even then, only so much as is necessary to stay in power.

      Allow me to explain this to you in more pragmatic terms: if your country could, with reasonable effort, turn everyone outside its borders into slaves, sell them and their children on the open market, as well as anyone inside its own borders (up to 50% + 1 to keep itself in power 'democratically), it totally would. Buying and selling people's information, 'social' justice without any sort of reason...these are simply preludes to what is already here.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    10. Re:Foreigners by Sockatume · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They're not snooping on one, specific service at a point in the US. They're looking at any appropriate traffic that happens to pass through the US. Any information that passes through the US must be considered compromised by the NSA.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    11. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have forgotten that this is happening all over Europe too and in many countries in Europe they are forbidden by law from even informing their user base that they providing information to their governments.

    12. Re:Foreigners by s122604 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You sound angry. I'm glad my NSA is keeping tabs on you, who knows what you are capable of.

    13. Re:Foreigners by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article explicitly says this does not appear to be based on the co-operation of US providers but rather international fibre taps - presumably placed or operated by compliant intelligence agencies that are merely extensions of the NSA. The US might be a ringleader in this activity, but other countries have out of control security services as well. After a long period of political silence in the UK we finally got some discussion this week, after senior cabinet members who served on the national security committees admitted they had no clue anything like that was happening. Cameron's response was priceless, he said the agencies would have told them about it if they'd asked!

    14. Re:Foreigners by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      As a Foreigner, load up your IM with US citizens. 100's of them :) Sit back, be politically active and as you make watch lists, your IM list follows you.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    15. Re:Foreigners by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      doesn't help when US has taken the liberty of acting like it's legal for them to hack and intercept services that are abroad(even if they themselves declared such actions as comparable to war/terrorism).

      personally I think the rest of the world should just declare US services as free targets for hacking(and subsequently deny any extradition requests or information requests for such activities). oh and don't pretend there's not economic impact from hacking ceo's and politicians - and thanks to piss poor inside security and audits inside NSA the NSA operatives are free to play with that information on the stock market or sell it so others can play with it.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have forgotten that this is happening all over Europe too and in many countries in Europe they are forbidden by law from even informing their user base that they providing information to their governments.

      Citation needed, which countries you are referring to?

    17. Re:Foreigners by GoChickenFat · · Score: 1

      It's because your a user of technology. Non-citizens are just the excuse used by the US government when we know full well we're all losing our rights to privacy. In fact, I'd suggests non-citizens have more privacy. You're country may not subject you to constant government forced data collection in the form of "insurance" - medical, home, auto, etc. or law enforcement...whatever no privacy exists anywhere anymore.

    18. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can break most USA laws and get away with it (assuming they aren't also illegal in your own country), so why do you expect USA protections to protect you? I have no expectations that Congo would do anything to protect me nor do I expect them to kidnap me for not paying any of their taxes. However if I transported goods through their land then I'd expect some amount of government would be involved.

      Besides, your government spies on me and then trades that info with my government. You have whatever rights your government decides. Take things up with your government before going after others. You could push for a mandate that all external internet access goes through some government portal to scrub all personal data.

    19. Re:Foreigners by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Agree to delay the individual mandate, in exchange for a repeal of the debt-ceiling laws.

      From US Government Agencies? You certainly do!

      Just like *I* have no reasonable expectation of privacy from the GCHQ, the German spy agency, the Russian one, or any other foreign government's espionage apparat.

      Or do you really believe that foreigners in foreign countries are bound by YOUR laws?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    20. Re:Foreigners by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Define appropriate

    21. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should the US gov't care about your privacy?

      Because they (pretend they) fight for human rights worldwide?

    22. Re:Foreigners by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Even if they are doing the same themselves?

    23. Re:Foreigners by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Many of them never visit other countries.

    24. Re:Foreigners by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the constitution - if read by anyone who considers all men to born equal - doesn't limit the freedoms and rights to american citizens.

      however when they wrote it back in the day they didn't consider themselves to blatantly have any authority over rest of the world.

      uh and why should the usa care about international treaties and declarations about crime, property, basic human rights and all that? uh? maybe so that they would have some expectation that the rest of the word cares about those treaties.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    25. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then do something about it and stop using US-based web services.

      Also European and Australian ones, in fact any web services that are in a country where there is an NSA-affiliated tap point, or where your traffic crosses one of those countries. In fact, if you are a 'foreigner' best disconnect completely and go live in a cave -- but not one dug by the CIA because then you're a terrorist and we will send drones.

      "European" is much too broad stroke here, there are major differences between the countries. If you host online services in Norway fx law enforcement have to go through normal official court proceedings and get a specific court order for a provider to have to give them any information on the customer covered by the court order. No blanket access, they have to go through normal due process in each case, there are no special laws that circumvent this. They/NSA could of course still tap at the network level at some point, but use services that use encryption and that is much less likely.

    26. Re:Foreigners by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Email and chat protocols, per the article.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    27. Re:Foreigners by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The problem is the US domestic drag net and lack of Constitutional protections. The weak telco laws of other countries are internal issues. If they collect all their telco data at one point and gift to the NSA, thats not a reflection on US Constitutional protections. Other counties give their citizens data away to the USA for many reasons.
      They might get better rates on US military upgrades. Their troops get to take part in more advanced projects.
      Their experts get something back over the years on unrelated areas of interest.
      Their general staff like the travel, US tax payer funded equipment and meetings.
      Australia and New Zealand both were signed on early and are addicted to the US data streams. Germany hopes to get something back if they just offer all their data for a few more decades.
      The other aspect is the trade deals. With the US gov pushing the privacy and security of buying into US cloud products. Its hard to legally say no.
      The NSA could have had it all if they just stayed away from domestic US surveillance as they always trained their staff to.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    28. Re:Foreigners by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The US government doesn't have any special obligations with regards to not stabbing every non-American in the world with a pencil, but that doesn't mean that it's acceptable for them to do so.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    29. Re:Foreigners by V+for+Vendetta · · Score: 0

      Much to my dismay, my own country, Germany.

    30. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Drama queen, are you? The CIA wasn't created until 1947, and it was nothing like it is now until about 20 years ago when black budgets went their way.

    31. Re:Foreigners by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The leadership of NATO will never let their governments escape the NSA. The best that will happen is a very public telco rebuild. From one hub 'known' (Frankfurt) to link to the NSA, new domestic only hubs will open as national 'data' protecting loops. The contractors will have any new systems wired back to the NSA from day one.
      "Comms giant pushes anti-spy network"
      http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20131014-52385.html
      http://www.dw.de/telekom-hopes-to-stave-off-nsa-snoops-by-keeping-internet-traffic-in-germany/a-17154274
      http://rt.com/news/deutsche-telekom-internet-spies-176/

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    32. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carried on the Internet.

    33. Re:Foreigners by camperdave · · Score: 1

      As per the NSA dictionary "Appropriate traffic" is "Any traffic that traverses a network".

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    34. Re: Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, they don't stab with pencils.

    35. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. Why should the US gov't care about your privacy? You are not a citizen and aren't provided any special rights by the US gov't.

      Because the US likes to tell the world they are a prime example of freedom, democracy and human rights that other countries should follow. If the US say something like that and at the same time spy on the people they're adressing on an unprecedented scale, that somehow makes them look like hypocrites. And don't forget many of those spied upon are supposed to be friends and allies.

      I don't log into Chinese, French, German, or Russian websites and whine about their surveillance activities (pro-tip: they're all doing it too)

      Not logging into websites isn't enough. Things like this happen too. Whether or not any of those countries can collect information about you does not only depend on you, but also on busineses and other people you have dealings with, even indirectly.

    36. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that like saying "I will only email people from my state because I don't want my traffic going to other states?" They've got your traffic either way.

    37. Re:Foreigners by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      As a citizen of the USA, I am at least as sick of hearing that as you are. It ain't true, and the US Supreme Court has said so several times.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    38. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the Nazi's, or the Stasi or the KGB. But the Iranian[1] Syrian[2] and Israeli[3] ones
      [1] http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB435/
      [2] http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/posts/the_baby_and_the_baath_water
      [3] ...

    39. Re:Foreigners by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Drama queen, are you? The CIA wasn't created until 1947, and it was nothing like it is now until about 20 years ago when black budgets went their way.

      Really? The Iranian revolution was in 1953 and the CIA trained the SAVAK, the Shah's secret police.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    40. Re:Foreigners by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      The US government doesn't have any special obligations with regards to not stabbing every non-American in the world with a pencil,

      Pardon me for not performing an exhaustive search, but I'm pretty sure that it would be a violation of some treaty or other for the U.S. to go stab every non-American in the world with a pencil. So there is an obligation, though not one directly sourced from the Constitution.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    41. Re:Foreigners by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of hearing that just because there are evil people in the world we must all be treated as suspect. There is no difference in how the NSA treats you as a foreigner and us as citizens. Only in how they describe it to the press.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    42. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ve haff vays of reading zu email...

    43. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also the South Korean CIA (KCIA).

    44. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get it wrong.

      Nobody has privacy, especially US citizens since they're also potential terrorists. It doesn't matter who you are.

    45. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Central and South America in the 1970's, anyone? Pinochet? Videla? Stroessner? Somoza? Do those names ring a bell?

    46. Re:Foreigners by gsslay · · Score: 2

      Then why do practically all US based news sources emphasise that this snooping may also be happening to Americans? As if that's where the line is getting crossed?

      Either they think their readers need it to be happening to them before they'll give a shit. Or they think their readers are entirely OK with snooping on innocent foreigners, but not innocent Americans. Either way, that's worrying.

    47. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get off our website you commie dirt bag.

    48. Re:Foreigners by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's not that you have no right to privacy, it's just that where the NSA is concerned, it's actions against U.S. Citizens is the most clear and incontrovertible evidence that it is out of control and acting beyond it's charter and authority.

      In the same way, when protesting your own government's involvement, actively cooperating and allowing the NSA to have an active tap in your country is a more clear violation of trust than simply failing to protest the NSA in the U.N. would be.

    49. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am so sick of hearing this idea that just because I am not a citizen of the USA then somehow I have less rights to privacy.

      Why?
      When I go to a country other than the US, I have fewer rights and far less of a right to privacy than citizens of that country. Why should it be any different in reverse?

      The point is that the NSA is supposed to be prohibited from spying on US citizens, they're not supposed to be involved in Domestic affairs. This has nothing at all to do with you, your privacy, or your rights- this is about a US government agency doing something it isn't supposed to under US law.
      Your legal rights in other places have nothing to do with US law at all.

    50. Re:Foreigners by phorm · · Score: 1

      You don't have the ability to take it up with a US court, for one...

    51. Re:Foreigners by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      They're not snooping on one, specific service at a point in the US. They're looking at any appropriate traffic that happens to pass through the US. Any information that passes through the US must be considered compromised by the NSA.

      What makes you think that this is limited to US only traffic?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    52. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm equally sick of hearing this idea that a spy agency should not try to spy on other countries.

    53. Re:Foreigners by AlphaWoIf_HK · · Score: 1

      Um. Why should the US gov't care about your privacy?

      Why shouldn't they? It is morally wrong to spy on innocents.

      --
      Da derp dee derp da teedly derpee derpee dum. Rated PG-13.
    54. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol I'm a Norwegian and if you think this is the case if push came to shove (or even on a whim) then you're completely deluded (as most are).

      I remember a blog they were allowed to confiscate a year or two ago, they took something like 5000 other blogs with them at the same time FBI-style. No problem, a few moronic newspaper articles and not even any kind of meaningful slap on the wrist.

      And that's if it is at all public. Public stuff is mostly for sending messages, usually idiotic ones over in-fighting or if someone is to be publicly “executed” (be it right or wrong). Due process doesn't matter much (if it can even be said to exist in Norway) when nobody can/will know and you're not intending to involve any jurisprudence anyway. There is no shortage of people with the know-how to do whatever they fucking like both inside and outside of any government organization.

      Splices don't show up on logs people, get real. Sucking up whatever radio wave propagates through their equipment doesn't show up on your logs. Do you live in a functioning non-leaking Faraday cage? Do you fuzz your screens? Metallize your windows? Thought not. It's not like they're trying to talk to you or use your bandwidth.

      Do you believe there will be any sufficient security for the non-constitutional (although they'll try to change the constitution as needed later) pro-EU Datalagringsdirektivet (Data Retention Directive)? That nobody will get to do whatever the fuck they want with it? Are you suggesting they'll transcribe the records from the systems manually into a 100% air-gapped database set under heavy armed security requiring multiple public court orders to even access physically? That they'll even know it if they were had? All that when a juicy paper archive was stored in the middle of Oslo without any significant real security whatsoever?

      Do you pay any attention to the “local” news at all or does the avalanches of tits and twats and political nonsense work as intended?

      The only saving grace is that the crypto-commie-nazi “power at any cost” “iron ring” (their WWII symbolism, not mine) assholes (that would be the hyper-corrupt nominally social-democratic “Labour” party first and foremost) aren't as much in charge any more as they were since they got booted out of office but there's an awful long way to go yet as those traitors have continually entrenched themselves deep into all the upper parts of society and power for nearly a full century.

      Did you not see their stooges on parade in court after 22/7? Both administrative and operative police officers who figuratively radiated party allegiance? Did you not see them not actually giving a shit about anything except as for their own image and power? Selling their grandmothers? These people gladly kill their own children if that's what it takes.

      And you think any dinky laws will help you? Or that it would even matter much if the law ruled in your favour? You would simply learn otherwise as quite a lot of people have before you.

    55. Re:Foreigners by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Fuck off. As a non-American, you have zero expectation of privacy from an American agency. I fully expect all foreign intelligence services to spy on me if they are able to do so... and guess what, it does not bother in me the least. I am not subject to their fucked up laws so I could care less what they see me do.

      Now, you may legitimately point out that some of those foreign intelligence services are sharing the data they gather with American agencies, and my response to that is not that the foreign agencies should stop spying on me. No, my response is that the American agencies are doing something illegal by receiving that data. In this case, you should be mad at your government for doing something unethical (possibly illegal under your laws) and not at the Americans for spying on you.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    56. Re:Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol I'm a Norwegian and if you think this is the case if push came to shove (or even on a whim) then you're completely deluded (as most are).

      Lol all you want, I have worked for two different companies that provide online services were we have dealt with law enforcement requests. Even in US there is actually a law behind NSAs its powers, please feel free to point to similar law in Norway.

    57. Re:Foreigners by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "If you host online services in Norway fx law enforcement have to go through normal official court proceedings and get a specific court order "

      Same in the UK. The UK Police got around the problem by asking the UK spy agency to provide information. That agency asks the NSA, then feeds it back to the police and then the police use the information provided to get court orders authorised the tapping.

      It's barely legal but utterly violates the intent of the law. The government is content to allow the practice to continue.

      In New Zealand, the govt changed the laws to make it legal after discovering that the police were acting illegally by getting the local spy agency to spy for them without bothering to get court orders first.

    58. Re:Foreigners by Xest · · Score: 1

      Was an interesting article in The Guardian from Huhne who of course before his fall was right at the highest echelons of government and stated that none of them had any clue anything like prism was happening. He believes only perhaps the home secretaries have known once they got the jobs and spoke to the guys there but kept it quiet because of the illegality of it and no MP wanting to be implicated in something illegal. This explains why numerous home secretaries have said they're against the Interception Modernisation Program until they actually become the home secretary - because they realise they have to push it through to make what the security services already doing legal and hope no one realises they were doing it when it was illegal (as they are currently).

      God only knows what would've happened to the £4bn or so they had quoted for it though given that it has already been done and was already there. That's a lot of spare money for something they've already built with their existing budget.

    59. Re:Foreigners by Xest · · Score: 1

      The same applies to privacy though, the US signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 1977 and ratified it in 1992. Article 17 of this document states:

      1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.

      2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

      So really, the US does have an obligation not to arbitrarily spy on absolutely everyone's communications. The treaty does not differentiate between Americans and non-Americans.

      If the US doesn't want to abide by this treaty then it should pull out of it, but it wont, because it likes beating countries it dislikes over the head with the human rights stick, something it could not do without being laughed at as a non-signatory. The fact is it wants the best of both worlds - it wants the ability to pretend it's all high and mighty, defender of human rights, but it also wants to violate some of the most basic principles of human rights going. Sadly it's a broader problem than this though, reading through the universal declaration of human rights on which the above covenant is based feels more like a checklist of human rights violations the US has carried out ranging from torture, detention without trial, breach of privacy and so on and so forth.

  3. Isn't it ironic by Angturil · · Score: 0, Troll

    That when a government department actually does its job, and does it well, everyone seems upset. I want my intelligence community to be competent, get all the information we need to protect our interests, and do it well, and the NSA has done this and then some. Their only mistake was perhaps a lack of internal security. Instead of criticism, they should be commended for a job well done. The world is not a safe place, and information is power. I want the good guys to win. I'm a Canadian, but I support the NSA, and the job it does to protect American (and indirectly) Canadian interests.

    1. Re:Isn't it ironic by durin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I want the good guys to win."

      And you think the NSA and the US government are the good guys?

      Agh! The stupid! It burns!

      --
      Why, yes! I AM new here.
    2. Re:Isn't it ironic by lightknight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to assume that the choices are mutually exclusive: Soviet KGB-style interrogations and intelligence, or total Anarchy.

      I ask you, why did we even fight the Cold War, and win it, if we were just going to embrace everything at a later time?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no their mistake was to become one of the very things they where supposed to protect the you from, an abusive conspiratorial bunch of nut-cases that don't think they have to answer even to the politicians let alone the people.

    4. Re:Isn't it ironic by coofercat · · Score: 1

      A little too much efficiency leads to a police state, or a surveillance state, or a security state.

    5. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the NSA has done this and then some.

      And it's exactly the "and then some" part that is problematic. Especially since that "some" is actually a lot.

    6. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world is not a safe place, and information is power. I want the good guys to win. I'm a Canadian, but I support the NSA, and the job it does to protect American (and indirectly) Canadian interests.

      What exactly makes you think it's going to do anything to protect Canadian interests? The NSA has already been proven to use the information it gathers for industrial and economic espionage, even against those countries the US considers allies.

      The fact is the NSA spying has done irreparable damage to the US intelligence community, and is going to do much more economic damage as countries and corporations stop trusting and using the US for operations, manufacturing or banking.

      The apparently infinitely small amount of safety that this spying has granted the US in no way matches the massive damage it's going to do to our economy and our freedom.

    7. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That when a government department actually does its job, and does it well, everyone seems upset.

      You probably also cheer on policemen who beat up and kill demonstrators. The constitution protects private communication. It is not the job of any government department to spit on the constitution and rip it to shreds. Or if it is the job, then the department needs to be put under close supervision until its job description agrees with the constitution and/or get dissolved.

      As it stands, the NSA is a terrorist organisation that has duped government and congress into paying them taxpayers' money in order to abolish the taxpayers' rights. They actively thwart and sabotage congressional and government oversight and consider themselves unaccountable. They kidnap and kill people without due process and oversight, and have no qualms killing innocent bystanders in the process. They engage in blackmail and turn the court system into a mockery by feeding it with illegally obtained or fabricated evidence withholding its actual origin.

      They are the largest terrorist organisation ever paid by the U.S., and the U.S. has a history of funding a lot of terrorist organizations.

    8. Re:Isn't it ironic by jigawatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a Canadian, but I support the NSA, and the job it does to protect American (and indirectly) Canadian interests.

      "But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother."

    9. Re:Isn't it ironic by ATMAvatar · · Score: 2

      Maybe the goal was to put the KGB out of business so we could hire its agents as consultants on the cheap.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    10. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here :)

    11. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do you think are the good guys? The EU? Russia? China? The UN? (Sorry, couldn't help but verge into the realm of comedy.) World powers only, please; a toothless good guy is just a nonentity.

    12. Re:Isn't it ironic by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I ask you, why did we even fight the Cold War, and win it, if we were just going to embrace everything at a later time?

      You are making the mistake of assuming that the cold war was fought between lovers of freedom, democracy and individual rights, vs totalitarian all controlling power hungry nut jobs.

      Truth of the matter is, both sides were all controlling power-hungry nut jobs, and the cold war was a fight over who gets to be the all-controlling big-daddy of the world.

      The problems with the Soviets is that they laid their system bare, they didn't bullshit. This is how life is, these are your rights, if you're a party member, or if you work to benefit the system, you will be rewarded with perks (Nicer houses, cushy jobs , nice car, sometimes even nice German/American ones).
      If you don't work for the system, but not actively against it, you are pretty much left to your own devices, live and let live, and all that.
      If you work against the system, directly or indirectly (or you piss off someone in power), then you can be arrested, tried, stuck in prison/work camp, or otherwise disappear.

      Now the western system, that was far more subtle. They told you you were free, they gave you the impression you were, that you could choose who ruled you, but fundamentally I don't think the systems were different, like so:
      If you work for the system, or to its benefits, you are rewarded with more tokens than most (currency) with which you can spend on bigger/nicer houses, or a nice foreign car, etc...
      If you ignore the system and go about your daily life, you are pretty much left alone. You earn your keeps, pay your dues, and you live you life.
      If you work against the system, directly or indirectly (or just piss off someone high up and well connected), you can be arrested, tried, put in a prison/work camp, or disappeared (via drone or otherwise). For minor misdemeanors they can just destroy you financially, which is another, less radical lever they have against you.

      Turns out, when push comes to shove, people are more willing to serve you if you give them the illusion of freedom, choice and power. One ideology was in your face, the other was in the background. Turns out this worked well for a long time, until the internet came around and made knowledge dissipation so easy, that people began to realise what their world really looks like.

      For some the revelations were not a surprise, for others it was a confirmation of what they suspected, but some are in shock about it all, and more are in denial about it.

    13. Re:Isn't it ironic by Entropius · · Score: 1

      An example of a toothless good guy? Well, Switzerland, for one. They have that citizen militia, but it's unlikely they'll be winning any wars with it.

      So maybe Switzerland is a non-entity ... but the Swiss lead pretty good lives. I'd prefer for my country to be a non-entity; that way it would stop taxing me to pay for an oversized military and let me and my countrymen get back to the business of leading ordinary happy lives.

    14. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! You made a funny... cheap consultants ...

    15. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goggles do nothing!

    16. Re:Isn't it ironic by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Man, if you think countries shouldn't have spy agencies you're nuts. Big Brother was a totalitarian government, not a spy agency. Remember, the only thing the NSA did wrong was to spy on Americans. If you think other countries aren't working overtime to spy on America, you're froot loops.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re:Isn't it ironic by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Should a distinction be made between 'spying on the American government' and 'spying on the American people?' It makes perfect sense that another country would want to know what US military capabilities and diplomatic ambitions might be, but it's another thing altogether when they are reading the emails of people with no involvement in international affairs just on the off-chance that something interesting might turn up.

    18. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you think other countries aren't working overtime to spy on America, you're froot loops.

      Crook logic, justifies anything by badmouthing the victim. There is no country with a surveillance apparatus of the U.S.' size. In the context of international relations, the U.S. chooses to behave like a bully and a mafia boss.

      At the current point of time, the largest danger to democracy in the Western hemisphere is the U.S.A. And it does not help that the NSA drags the secret services of their "allies" into the quagmire of trying to evade democratic control and exert powers that are not supposed to be in the hands of the secret service.

      In the Germany of the 30s and 40s, your neighbors could silently disappear overnight, dragged off and killed by the Gestapo. Germany is now back to the same situation, except that the Gestapo is run by the U.S.A. The NSA claims to have "thwarted" a large number of terrorist plots on German ground. By calling the "terrorists" on the phone and asking them to stop? Hardly. By letting the authorities bring them to court? There have been no court cases. There has been no due process exerted. Either the NSA is lying, or it is kidnapping and killing people on foreign soil or is inducing the foreign secret services to kidnap and kill on preselected information without informing the government.

      Terrorists are peanuts compared to that.

    19. Re:Isn't it ironic by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      That when a government department actually does its job, and does it well, everyone seems upset. I want my intelligence community to be competent, get all the information we need to protect our interests, and do it well, and the NSA has done this and then some. Their only mistake was perhaps a lack of internal security. Instead of criticism, they should be commended for a job well done. The world is not a safe place, and information is power. I want the good guys to win. I'm a Canadian, but I support the NSA, and the job it does to protect American (and indirectly) Canadian interests.

      How do you know the USA or NSA are the "good guys"? Because they told you they were? Because the news portrays them that way? Would you feel the same way if these powers were used to blackmail those in public office, or to harass legitimate political protesters? What if they were used for industrial espionage, giving American companies an advantage over Canadian companies? It's a secret program, so no one really knows the extent of what it is used for. Do you just trust that the people in charge are honest and that their values line up with yours?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    20. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Big Brother was a totalitarian government, not a spy agency.

      Do you know the difference between a totalitarian government and just a spy agency? What the government decides to do with the information gathered by the spy agency. That simple.

    21. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I'm a Canadian, but I support the NSA, and the job it does to protect American (and indirectly) Canadian interests.

      As a Canadian, I must apologize for the stupidity of my fellow citizen.

    22. Re:Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An example of a toothless good guy? Well, Switzerland, for one. They have that citizen militia, but it's unlikely they'll be winning any wars with it.

      The only war they are interested in is war on Swiss ground, like it should be. And their mentality makes them quite unsuitable for occupying their country. Don't underestimate the "toothless good guys". They are nice and friendly, but don't rub them the wrong way.

  4. Fidonet by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    I do not even know if the Fidonet infrastructure is still working or not.

    Yes, I was a sysop back then.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Fidonet by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Probably runs over the internet...

  5. Cloud Service Security = Oxymoron by mrthoughtful · · Score: 2

    Yes. Posting all your contacts on the Internet is open to breaches of privacy (regardless of zero-day exploits).

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft - all of them kowtow to the NSA, the CIA, the FBI. Why?
    Because in return their lobbyists get to bend the ears of the legislators.

    Why is anyone surprised by any of this?

    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
    1. Re:Cloud Service Security = Oxymoron by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about cloud services?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Cloud Service Security = Oxymoron by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      If recent revelations are any indication, it's not like the people who didn't have lobbyists had much choice in the matter either.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  6. Most transparent administration ever by GoChickenFat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess "most transparent" actually referred to us and not the government.

  7. We caused it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You have *less* rights to privacy than a USA citizen? In this case of privacy is there a number less than zero?

    The USA citizen that has no special associations is a peon, pal. We're in the same boat.

    We caused it. We elected people that wrote the PATRIOT Act and gave those powers to the NSA.

    We are the ones who get all side tracked when a politician says "Look! Some gay people want to get married!" Or look "Abortion!" Or "We need security and we need to make adjustments to our Liberty!" ""If you are against it, you are helping the terrorists!""

    And assholes like Hannity and Rush jump on board and their listener/lemmings just nod their heads and parrot the same things and the politicians go along because they want to keep their powerful, cushy, overpaid jobs. And the terror-industrial-military complex rakes it in!

    And in the meantime shit like this sails on through.

    And we got this mess in Congress right now and it's our fault. We allowed the lunatic fringe to ( less than 0.5% of our population) to fuck it up for everyone else.

    As it stands, the Republican party will never - ever get another vote from me - ever. They are too nutty and they need to dissolve.

    1. Re:We caused it. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Let's not presume that this has anything to do with parties, lest we fall into the same 'Look!' trap you described above.

      Tell me, if this be a Republican problem, what was the Democrats response to it? Tell me about how they cleaned it up once they took control of the white house and the Senate.

      Truth be told, your best bet for seeing this fought is through the Tea Party - simply because they'd rather not pay the taxes to fund it.

    2. Re:We caused it. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      We elected people that wrote the PATRIOT Act and gave those powers to the NSA.

      Did you? I thought those were artifacts of the Military Industrial Complex hard at work; things above and beyond the power and control of the electorate and elected officials.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:We caused it. by Bucc5062 · · Score: 2

      No, I don't hire a lunatic to clean up a mess. The Tea Party (as I see them separate from the Republican Party) carries a lot of weight for what has happened in our recent political environment. The RNC would be best served by forcing a split or not recognizing members that associate with the Tea Party. Let them attempt to stand outside the power structure the RNC has built.

      As to the Democratic response, it has always been the case that the Democratic party was more fractious, less prone to lock step voting then the republican party members. When the Democrats held power, it was Blue Dog Democrats that stopped the ability of the DP to fully implement their programs. Single payer may have made it through, but for southern dixiecrats that would not support such a bill. Such is democratic politics.

      Still, I'd rather a party who attempts to represent their people, then one who primarily represents their backers and cannot have independent voting on issues. At times I was close to supporting some republicans (John McCain in 2000 for example). Later I am glad I listened to my gut for he, like most of his colleagues were blowing smoke to hid their true nature...opportunists.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    4. Re:We caused it. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I'll use plain language -

      The parties are a ploy to fool the weak minded.

      Rather like the illusion in the Emerald City. Never mind the man behind the curtain.

    5. Re:We caused it. by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Of course they are, them who controls the masses, controls the wealth and the power. That is not lost on me. Still they have to work with the system they created. A party sets the tone for how the masses can be controlled. The problem is that when the public apparatus gets out of control it can break things and can do so without discrimination. Think mob mentality gone wild (Lord of the Flies). We would be better off with a party that governs from the left and allows moments of radical right commentary to help adjust law then a radicalized public leadership that incites primal actions instead of conservative, thoughtful ideas to governing.

      Stop using plain language, it does not suit you and really obfuscates your point.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    6. Re:We caused it. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware how you'd have any idea what suits me and what does not.

      And you're still laboring under the delusion that Obama's policies were not identical to Bush's, by way of implying there's a 'tone' to be set.

      Unless 'tone' is nothing more than 'spin'.

    7. Re:We caused it. by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      It seems sarcastic wit is your norm so I was just returning the favor. You are seemingly blind to the fact the the general Democratic platform is different from the republican platform and that it does not matter if the name at the top is Obama or Bush, the parties do seek different agendas at times. Obama has pushed through programs that would never have been presented by Bush. He has continued some nasty programs started by Bush, but then he's not been able to focus on much more then the economy, thanks in part to the Tea Party and the norquist pledge that has bound republicans to a self-destructive path.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    8. Re:We caused it. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Judge them not by their words, but by their actions.

      Or not. It's kind of a red pill/blue pill thing. Some people take comfort in the illusion.

    9. Re:We caused it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude youre responding to is a nut. It is better if normal people just start ignoring these red/blue folks.

  8. Bandwidth? by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 1

    It's been an open secret for years now that the branches of the federal government tend to "bury" their budget inside of other allocations to hide them from outsiders, supposedly explaining the existence of $500 hammers and $1,000 toilets. Is the NSA also doing this, but with bandwidth rather than dollars? It might explain how suddenly the various ISPs are up in arms about bandwidth hogs and how a small percent are using up the majority of the bandwidth available on the network....

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
    1. Re:Bandwidth? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The NSA grew and shaped digital thinking on US domestic telco networks and world wide interconnects. There are no historical usage "bumps" for the NSA inside its own network - the USA.
      The only unhappy time for the US and UK was a very short period in the 1950's when the Soviet Union strangely used onetime pads and kept its communications chatter down.
      Apart of the odd break down or political issues with NZ or the UK the US has always seemed to keep pace by setting telco standards before bandwidth issues became an issue.
      Its easy when the world has to catch up with your systems years later.
      The trunk lines are limited in number and the telcos, software and hardware makers tame.
      As sudden break downs in bad weather or flooding shows, US public telcos dont really overbuild or diversify their networks much. Just massive local branding duplication in some profitable regions and long isolated interconnect spans. The dream of any surveillance state.
      The classic hardened military lines and NSA regional centres would be massively overbuilt with bandwidth wrt the basic public networks they log.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  9. Oh, even belonging to AMERICANS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Now that is an awful thing to do. It may violate the rights of the most important people in the world!
    (News-overlay with rotating globe, North-America in full focus, all other continents shrunk down and barely recognizeable...)

    Please do only spy on towelheads, frogeaters and sausage-lederhosen- people. And the mostly unknown tiny, untidy, yellow oder brown/black rest...the ones with the banana-skirts, y'know?

  10. Snail mail won't help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's also well known that all metadata of all snail mail packages are recorded, logged, tracked, whatever. On top of that, the ability to open, check contents, and re-seal packages when so desired is there and you'd be hard pressed to detect it in most cases. Snail mail won't help.

    1. Re:Snail mail won't help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can send snail mail to "Current Occupant" and withhold a return a address.

    2. Re:Snail mail won't help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no no no....wrong example. Imagine for a second that EVERY letter or package you pull from your mailbox has been opened. That is more accurate here.

    3. Re:Snail mail won't help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several "security" envelopes deep and using multiple re-mailer services, information spread across different "packages" using different re-mailers and different orders for the same re-mailers. They want to spy on everything break it up into unintelligible small pieces and flood them with data.

      For example, "Thanks I got the copy of your book, that you sent me."
      101 Thanks -> package 1
      243 I -> package 2
      299 got -> package 3 ...
      93248 me. -> package 12

      So what they would have is 12 envelopes dropped at different mailboxes (random return addresses), going to 12 different destination re-mailers and how many ever levels deep of re-mailing you do for one message.

      TCP/IP over snail mail with encryption would be even more frustrating for them, especially if the key negotiation happened using dead drops, etc.
      Is there an RFC for this?

      Basically make the mass spying untenable by massively increasing the size/complexity of the hay stack,

  11. Clapper... by surfdaddy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Clapper was the guy who lied to Congress, saying that the NSA was NOT collecting data or spying on US citizens.

    What the FUCK has happened to this country?

    1. Re:Clapper... by bigtrike · · Score: 4, Informative

      For people who aren't aware:
      "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner by saying no."

      http://www.nbcumv.com/mediavillage/networks/nbcnews/pressreleases?pr=contents/press-releases/2013/06/09/nbcnewsexclusiv1370799482417.xml

    2. Re:Clapper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck happened is people actually thought there was a difference between the R's and the D's and got caught up rooting for 'political' football teams to realize that the end goals of each are pretty much the same with a few shades of differences sprinkled in here in there. Sure the retoric people buy into devides everyone, but in the end has any thing reallly halted in terms of total government invasion of privacy. A lot of these NSA spying programs sprung up out of 9/11 and Bush and have only expanded under Obama. There is no difference these people hate you. There are already so many laws on the books that can ensare just about anyone if they don't like you. You are to be a good sheep and not step out of line for whatever the government wants or you will be handled, they are collecting enough info to black mail you and ruin your life and take you away under one of the many sick laws in this country. Look at civil forfieture, its legalized theft with no due process or even probable cause need, they stole some small grocery's store owner's $350,000 business account for no apparent reason and he has not be charged with a crime under civial forfeiture, and the war on drugs brought you this unconsituational theft under Regan.

    3. Re:Clapper... by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      Under his programming it was the most truthful response available:

      The First Law of Polticians: A politician must obey the will of the the agencies under his oversight.
      The Second Law: A politician must obey the will of his lobbyists, except where this conflicts with the first law.
      The Third Law: A politican must obey the will of the people he represents, except where this conflicts with the first and second laws.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Clapper... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      This is what's happening:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&persist_app=1&v=A3BHujm3cpY

      TL;DW: The rich are extracting trillions of $ from us all. Rep. and Dem. parties, Wall Street and regulators are *all* complicit. (How do you think Bernie Madoff got so far?)

      The NSA is just helping them figuring out who's life to ruin before the whistle get blown.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    5. Re:Clapper... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      "least untruthful"

      He should go to jail. When testifying publicly before Congress on something that touches secret issues, you get to say two things only:

      1. The truth
      2. "This involves secret issues that should be discussed behind closed doors."

      That is it. Assuming you aren't a crook pleading the Fifth.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    6. Re:Clapper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fourth Law: Classified.

    7. Re:Clapper... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      The Zeroth Law of politicians: A politician must above all act to retain their own position.

    8. Re:Clapper... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Blame Clapper for allowing the program. But don't blame him for his testimony, because there was no correct answer here.
      No = lie that preserves top-secret information.
      Yes = releases top-secret information.
      No answer = Yes

  12. But it's only the metadata! by Gothmolly · · Score: 2

    But they're only tracking who is talking to whom, so that's ok right? Right?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:But it's only the metadata! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like they are tracking all the contacts of anyone in African continent raising in the political game, according to the released diplomatic cables. A leader don't do what is best for US interest? Tell his enemies where his lovers, associates, barber and family are hiding.

  13. IMAP without SSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which email providers offer IMAP without using SSL?

    Or does the NSA perform MitM extensively (it would be easy to detect - just keep copies of the certificates forever and create a white-list of proven certificates)

    1. Re:IMAP without SSL? by Burz · · Score: 1

      Which email providers offer IMAP without using SSL?

      Or does the NSA perform MitM extensively (it would be easy to detect - just keep copies of the certificates forever and create a white-list of proven certificates)

      Recent revelations show the NSA can perform mitm against PKI at will. Within that context they can decrypt SSL traffic. You would have to implement SSL so that the key exchange does not rely on PKI for validation.

    2. Re:IMAP without SSL? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Only if they don't have access to the certificates. At this point, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they do - either by 'tell no-one' top-secret requests, or by hacking into servers and just stealing them. Remember that only larger companies actually run and secure their own servers: If the server is hosted colo or a cloudy VM, what's do stop them just requesting access from whoever has physical control? You think Amazon would tell Mom and Pop's Email Co if the NSA gave a secret order for a copy of their server's drive?

  14. Clapper is off the hook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, who should prosecute him for perjury? Fast and Furious Attorney General Eric Holder? Eric Holder already has examined his own repeated perjury before congress about his own unconstitutional grab of executive powers and concluded that it's nothing to write home about.

    You won't bring justice to other corrupt government officials via the corrupt Department of Justice. Least of all for perjury or overstepping of their mandate or bullshitting congress or evading oversight.

    1. Re:Clapper is off the hook. by PPH · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I read that as Crapper.

      I thought the NSA was developing fiber optic periscopes that they could snake up the sewer lines.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  15. Those are pitiful suggestions by Burz · · Score: 1

    For one thing, your email domain is unlikely to be taken seriously by existing email providers if you run a server from your home (and consumer ISP plans won't let you do this anyway); running it from a hosting provider would hardly improve privacy even with encryption. The call to "encrypt everything" would, for email, imply using PGP which leaves the 'who' and subject parts of the messages unencrypted.

    If you want to run something really effective against corporate-state mass surveillance, then go for this. Everything is encrypted end-to-end by default, and its designed to carry everything from P2P like bittorrent to decentralized email based on DHT. It even runs on Android!

    1. Re:Those are pitiful suggestions by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Can't send mail from a domestic connection. Those IP ranges are on every spam blacklist, as most mail sent from them is the work of spam-sending malware. You can recieve, but not send.

    2. Re:Those are pitiful suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use I2P and that problem is solved, one of the systems even works for all ordinary mail (it has gateways). In addition to I2P there are other alternatives such as Retroshare (never used it myself) and the beta Bitmessage thingy (never used that either).

      Nothing stops you from using GPG before entering the mail into the system, and for tht mater onthing stop you doing your own air-gap between those two things either. If the NSA wants to beat that they have to start personal surveillance of you and your computer your flat/house, your car etc.

      And of course if you want to beat that you have to set up your own system of innocent multi-attribute deadman switches/triggers in advance: you'll have to “surveill” yourself in advance Be careful you don't launch anything you don't want launched :D

      (This is fun stuff, imagine a world where a prolonged Tor, Freenet, I2P, or internet outage starts to flip all sorts of switches and triggers... could get hectic to say the least. This is inevitable the way things are going, it will happen at some point, and the fools in charge will blame anyone but themselves for pushing it this far. If you ask me a whole lot of ordinary people wouldn't particularly mind if they set off a nuke or similar against their enemies after they were dead).

      BTT: I2P has at least two different mail systems/approaches/uses to choose from btw.

      Just remember that no one can guarantee anything: everything is as-is and best effort, and while it is extremely much better than the broken default/current system it comes at a price (usually bandwidth).

      Even so (and just as a curious anecdote) Gmail accepted my mail sent from a non-DNS-registered non-static home IP subnet OpenBSD box to my own mail Gmail address just fine insofar as it sent it to my spam folder (and of course I fished it (them actually) out of there). Very handy sometimes :)

      I could have white-listed it and maybe run it happily for as long as I wanted, same for anyone else.

      Fuck the future eh? :)

    3. Re:Those are pitiful suggestions by Burz · · Score: 1

      The point isn't to interface with traditional email, but for I2P users to communicate amongst themselves without surveillance. IOW, get people you know to install it.

    4. Re:Those are pitiful suggestions by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I've dabbled in Retroshare myself. As an email replacement it's not much use, as it only communicates with people you've already exchanged keys with. No way to introduce yourself to someone you can't already reach by other means. But if you're looking for a secure IM program, I'd highly recommend it. It also has some excellent friend-to-friend file sharing abilities, which are sure to be of use to those with a healthy disrespect for copyright law. Only criticism I'd make is that the authentication is only 2048b RSA. Secure, for now, but short enough to make cryptography experts uncomfortable for the future. Hopefully a future version can take it up to 4096.

  16. Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA plays their games, and we play ours.

    Everybody need to to start useing and exchanging Dis-information. Send the NSA on a wild goose chase.

  17. Next, NSA going through your garbage, returns most by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

    NSA has been discovered going through everyone's garbage. When asked to comment, after first deigning repeatably under oath in a least 15 separate recorded incidences of misleading and false statements under oath directly to Congress, Today, Obama said he just learned of the existence of the NSA... "OMG, What a surprise!" Obama was reported as saying when he saw the paper this morning, this despite the fact that Snowdens revelations were a full years ago... A leak through the WH says "If NSA is going through your garbage, it's been reported that in most cases almost all garbage is later returned." .. "Reports Black funding for routine Garbage collection of all Americans will be fully implemented in 2 years, and a reported 82 Trillion dollars a year which the Fed is reportedly supplying huge loans at only 32.26% compounding interest, the first year is expected to whip entire SS reserves.."

  18. What do they need it for? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    What the hell is the NSA being paid to do? Right now they're spending money, manpower and resources on trolling the internet for people's buddy lists and address books. For what? Because some terrorist might spill the beans on his super plans over AIM?

    This is getting ridiculous. The NSA has clearly become a giant black hole of money which can and will hire an office full of people, a warehouse of computer equipment, and a 20 year maintenance plan just to keep tabs on who is sending instant messages to who -- foreign or domestic.

    This isn't 1984 anymore. It's Brazil. I'm sure the NSA would like to think of themselves as Information Retrieval, but in reality they more resemble the Department of Records, no doubt complete with busy-seeming employees goofing off for most of the day.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:What do they need it for? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Just another example of the stupidity of dragnetting. Now, think of the size of the graph produced by analyzing all of these buddy lists. Now, think about the resources they've spent maintaining and developing the ability to scrub all of this internet traffic. Now think about all the potential "suspects" they'll end up with when 2 guys get busted with pipe bombs at the airport.

      They didn't have the resources to follow the Boston bomber or keep tabs on what he was up to because they've adopted some predictive technology strategy instead of relying on following leads.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  19. It shouldn't matter, but it does. by aclarke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this is the case, why is it that most of these articles use phrases like "many of them belonging to Americans"? If it doesn't matter, why is the point made? The answer, of course, is that it does matter. That is, it matters to American law. For reference, see https://www.aclu.org/nsa-surveillance-procedures and highlight the word "Americans".

    Speaking as a non-American, I think it shouldn't matter whether I'm American, Austrian, or Azerbaijani. We're all human and we all have the same rights. I find it offensive when I read these articles and there's always the "including Americans" tagged onto the article headline, like somehow it's OK if it's done to non-Americans. I realize it wouldn't be much different if any other country had been caught with their pants down. It's just that in this case it's the US (again).

  20. Encrypt Everything by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Don't use unencrypted sevices.

    Use encryption supplied by 3rd parties that uses proveable algorithms.

    Don't store your data on 3rd party sites.

    Use open source software.

  21. Echelon by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

    At one time, talking about Echelon tagged you as a tinfoil hat wearing nerd...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON

    who's laughing now :D

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  22. Anti-NSA service ads already out there. by Moskit · · Score: 1

    There are already ads for local email and web services based on recently revealed truth about USA.

    Don't want 'friends' to read your communication?
    Use {local brand name}.

    Of course if you use them, things will be still read by your country's services, but at least they are your compatriotes, not foreigners, they fall under your law, not USA twisted law (except where some corporation long hands will reach for you), and you might be arrested by friendlies, not by illegally invading Seals or Rabbits.

  23. Re:Next, NSA going through your garbage, returns m by tekrat · · Score: 1

    You forgot the part where they are building a 40 square-mile, 70 billion dollar warehouse in Utah to house everyone's garbage.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  24. NO- the NSA gets this information from source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instant Messaging has always been tightly coupled to Intelligence gathering by the racist state of Israel. The many IM companies based and linked to Israel were specifically created for the purpose of tracking the communications of vast numbers of Internet users. Why do you think IM services DEMAND your messages go through their servers? An IM service ONLY needs to act as match-maker in order to function, and yet not one of them works this way.

    Facebook, Microsoft and Yahoo might as well be divisions of the NSA. Google is actually the R+D division of the NSA. Every major intelligence service in the West deploys "shadow-Google" installations, massive centres of data-storage, indexing, mining etc, based entirely of the hardware and software infrastructure used in Google's 'civilian' centres.

    When the NSA taps directly into the backbones of the Internet, it is NOT to gather information held by the Internet giants- that data they get directly from the source. No, the NSA is involved in bluesky work as well, so they spend tens of billions each year exploring the theory of collecting data "in the wild". They do this because they can- because the monsters that rule you give them so much money, that not doing so would seem 'odd'.

    When new trends appear of the Internet, the NSA attempts to mine available data BEFORE they simply go to the new companies and demand direct access. This is useful practice, if nothing else, and helps develop new hardware and software surveillance methods. However, the quality of information gathered this way is CRAP to say the least. These methods overlap those used when specifically targeting individuals, without the same purpose, so are hard to justify against the work of other divisions of the NSA.

    The NSA is vastly and ecstatically more interested in the Microsoft Xbox Home citizen surveillance project. Millions of complete morons, at their own expense, placing insanely sophisticated NSA spy devices in their own homes, and giving the NSA instant access to the information.

    Do you know that Slashdot has NEVER directly highlighted the link between Microsoft, Bill Gates, and the NSA. Yeah, it's promoted some stories that sorta addressed this issue in a sideways, depreciating fashion, to avoid suspicion. In the same way, Slashdot has completely ignored Bill Gates' partnership with Fox News supremo, Rupert Murdoch, to create the inBloom full surveillance database of every child in the USA. Likewise, the fact that Gates is one of the major players behind the CORE CURRICULUM project dumbing down kids all across America.

    When you have an Xbone in your home, the NSA get daily reports of who and when people use the living room. When you have an Xbone in your home (and worse, in your kids' bedroom) the NSA have a complete list of EVERY Xbone currently connected to the Internet, and can command any given console to immediately start streaming video to their servers. Like to have sex in the dark- well Microsoft thought of this, and gave the Xbone a first-class IR camera system that sees you clearly in the dark. Not a feature any game developer requested, or would have a use for. The depth/TOF/motion sensor that Kinect is famous for already uses IR, so did NOT need an ordinary IR camera to function.

    NSA spying on the Internet is a done deal, yesterday's news, and is utterly comprehensive and complete where possible, and where not possible will always require expensive old-school methods only really viable for spying on specific targets. If people started using end-point encryption in the IM conversations, for instance, there is ZERO universal ability for the NSA to spy on such communications if inserting back-doors into the software proves impractical.

    The irony is that the NSA (and other spy agencies) LOATH censorship and crackdowns by governments on Internet users, cos an open Internet is EASY to spy on, but a government suppressed Internet forces users to finally adopt solutions that defeat much of what the NSA currently does. Encryption is a nightmare to the

  25. Meanwhile, in Malaysia ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucky you. In my country if you reach into your pockets when a cop approaches, you're likely as not to get a gun drawn on you, and if you keep digging, 9mm slugs will soon be thudding into your body

    Meanwhile, in the Islamic country of Malaysia, the Interior Minister (the one who is in charge of the regular and secret police force) is publicly telling the cops to SHOOT FIRST and ask question (if there is any), later.

    And, incidentally, cases where innocent citizens in Malaysia were killed by the police ~ and there are a lot of these cases ~ are going nowhere.

    The courts are taking their sweet own time to process, and for the cases where the courts did tried, the police were all found NOT GUILTY.

    In one case, where someone was found choked to death while under police custody --- the Malaysian kangaroo courts found that the deceased HAD CHOKED HIMSELF TO DEATH.

  26. Flood the System with Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flood the NSA system with junk. SPAM it.