Slashdot Mirror


Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files To Russia

mspohr writes "There's an interesting interview with Edward Snowden in the NY Times. He talks freely about his decision to start collecting documents. His experience in reporting problems and abuse convinced him he would be discredited. He also states he didn't take any of the documents to Russia and that the Chinese don't have them either. 'What would be the unique value of personally carrying another copy of the materials onward? There's a zero percent chance the Russians or Chinese have received any documents,' he said. Snowden turned them all over to the journalists. He also corrects last week's NY Times story about the derogatory comment in his personnel file; it was due to him discovering and trying to report a vulnerability in the CIA's internal software."

22 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Only moose and squirrel have them by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once again our heroic leakers foil the bumbling Russkies!

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    1. Re:Only moose and squirrel have them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If only there were proof that they did have the documents. Better to spread FUD no matter the case, right?

      "Land of the free, home of the brave". Biggest joke of all time. Osama may be dead but he won the war with such success far beyond his wildest dreams.

    2. Re:Only moose and squirrel have them by darien.train · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bin Laden's stated goal was not to turn the west to Islam. Why would he want a bunch of white devils screwing up his precious Islam. He hated us remember?

      His goal was to destroy Wall St and the US/Saudi economy (He was mad at his rich family and their rich US friends - Like the Bush's and Clintons!). Hence crashing planes into our primary economic hub. Remember that part? Makes much more sense as a tactic for financial ruin opposed to a recruiting strategy wouldn't you say?

      In 2004, Bin Laden released a tape to Al-Jazeera where the former head of Al Qaeda laid out the purpose of the 9/11 attacks, and the organization’s goals. “We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah,” Bin Laden said.

      This is why I always laugh at the phrase "Never Forget." Everyone keeps forgetting!

      --
      I don't know how many years on this Earth I got left. I'm going to get real weird with it. - Frank Reynolds
    3. Re:Only moose and squirrel have them by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quite the contrary. The Russians and Chinese have access to US & UK top secret documents the same as anyone else that goes to various web sites.

      One thing you are discounting is the chain of lies and around Snowden's activities. One very interesting example of which is the birthday party at the Russian embassy in Hong Kong when the Russians later claimed that they had no idea he was coming to Moscow.

      The fact that there are no angels in Hell doesn't change the other fact that there is absolutely zero evidence that Snowden directly handed files over to anyone other than Glen Greenwald. "Oh, they can read it in the paper like everyone else!" Big fucking deal - we're not talking about that, we're talking about the claims that he directly and intentionally gave top secret documents to the Chinese and Russian governments; a claim Snowden has denied, and to date not a single fucking soul has managed to prove.

      I know this is a bit lofty of an ideal for statists like yourself to understand, but there's this concept called "presumption of innocence" that requires there to be actual evidence of what you claim before you're allowed to nail someone's ass to a tree.

      Crazy idea, I know.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Only moose and squirrel have them by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you recall that Mr. Greenwald's lover was carrying electronic copies of many documents with him, as well as a scribbled note with the password?

      Yes, I also seem to recall the UK government "probed" Mr Greenwald's lover for 8-9 hour before letting him thru the border. Pretty sure they wouldn't have done that if they had found a "spy". What Snowden did was most certainly illegal. I'm not so sure it was "wrong", but I'm sure as hell that baying for his crucifixion based on what been reported so far is immoral. .

      Having said that I think there' more than political "coincidence" to the timing. Just prior to it hitting the news Obama was loudly beating his chest telling the world he was "not going to put up with cyber spying from China". The meeting was supposed to be a big deal, Obama was going to get tough with "cyber-spies", the meeting was blown off the front pages by the Snowden story. Talk about "egg meets face", the US tried to claim the moral high ground by loudly proclaiming it was China who was spying on everyone, it's my contention the Chinese responded by pulling Uncle Sam's pants down in front of the whole world (politically speaking).

      When you look at the political powerhouses on the planet, Russia, US, EU and China, it's China (a federation of ancient empires) that shows the most unity at the top and given it's miraculous economic rise from famines to fortunes over the last 40yrs they have very strong support amongst the people. "Good", "evil", "apathetic", doesn't matter what kind of empire/republic it is, unity will win the day when push turns to shove..

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:Only moose and squirrel have them by MacDork · · Score: 5, Funny

      In 2004, Bin Laden released a tape to Al-Jazeera where the former head of Al Qaeda laid out the purpose of the 9/11 attacks, and the organization’s goals. “We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah,” Bin Laden said.

      This is why I always laugh at the phrase "Never Forget." Everyone keeps forgetting!

      I hear they even have insiders with the same agenda in the US congress.

    6. Re:Only moose and squirrel have them by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Informative

      Great, Bullwinkle. Watch me pull a rabbit out of MY hat.

      RELEVANT EXTRACT:
      [Snowden] felt confident that he had kept the documents secure from
      Chinese spies, and that the N.S.A. knew he had done so. His last
      target while working as an agency contractor was China...
      adding that he had had "access to every target, every active
      operation mounted by the N.S.A. against the Chinese. Full lists of
      them," he said.

      "If that was compromised," he went on, "N.S.A. would have set the
      table on fire from slamming it so many times in denouncing the damage
      it had caused. Yet N.S.A. has not offered a single example of damage
      from the leaks. They haven't said boo about it except "we think,"
      "maybe", "have to assume" from anonymous and former officials. Not
      "China is going dark." Not "the Chinese military has shut us out."

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. Zero Percent Chance? by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a zero percent chance the Russians or Chinese have received any documents,' he said. Snowden turned them all over to the journalists.

    Turning documents over to journalists, or anybody employed in any other profession, does not make them magically uninterceptable, unreadable, or unposessable by Russians, Chinese, or anybody else. He has no control over the distribution after he hands it off to anybody, and the people who have the stuff might not even know if someone else is reading it.

    --
    Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    1. Re:Zero Percent Chance? by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Funny

      God forbid anyone send them by email. They might fall into the hands of the NSA!

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:Zero Percent Chance? by khallow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking of lying, I'm more concerned about how radically the Obama administration changed its stories after Snowden's revelations. Basically, a bunch of officials were caught lying and only changed their story due to Snowden. It sure looks to me also like there is far more going on than most people want to believe.

  3. Re:Trust by segedunum · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Stabbing who in the back, exactly?

  4. Re:Trust by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He's blown a whole lot of trust as it is, by stabbing his country in the back so spectacularly.

    Precisely. Nonsensical things such as freedom and the constitution are overshadowed by the threat of the bogeymen who are out to get us.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  5. Re:Trust by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. He has done the US a great service in the long run.

    2. He is personally more trustworthy than the people in the US government and the intelligence community who have been caught lying already.

    My 2 cents.

  6. Not shared by him doesn't mean a thing by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The important thing to remember is that if it was so easy for him to get these documents, then that also means that there are about a million other people with the same clearance level as him who would find it equally easy. What's the betting that none of those are Chinese agents? Especially given how many Russian agents we've learned were working for the NSA and CIA during the cold war.

    People focus on Snowden's disclosure as if it's possibly giving information to America's enemies (or, at least, not-so-friendly friends), but any of them that doesn't have a completely inept intelligence agency of their own will already have the information he's released. It was only secret from the people to whom these agencies should be accountable.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  7. Re:Trust by ClassicASP · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I dunno....I'd say he stabbed his country's _government_ in the back. I wouldn't say he stabbed his country in the back though. So far I haven't heard anything that would indicate that Snowden hates America.

  8. Re:He'd better have something..... by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He does not need to remain relevant. I think he just wants a boring life now, possibly including some potatoes. He already knows that "May you live in interesting times" is a curse. And as long as he remains in a country that is willing to stick up a finger to the USA, he is probably safe.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  9. Some accused him of giving the files to Russia by thue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There has been various accusations that Snowden leaked the documents to Russia, willingly or unwillingly. This should (in a perfect world) make those accusations less valid. Also, this shows against that Snowden is damn brave and clever - it must have been very tempting to hold on to the documents, which he paid so dearly for.

    http://www.thenation.com/blog/174983/did-russia-china-harvest-snowdens-secrets#

  10. Re:Trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He's only "stabbed you in the back" if you're a bootlicker. Not all of us piss ourselves over "teh terrists" and need Big Brother to monitor our lives 24/7 "for our safety". He's no more stabbed anyone in the back than the persons who leaked the Pentagon Papers and the information on the Watergate scandal. Stop being a compliant ninny.

  11. Re:Trust by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What makes him think that everyone should believe him now?

    Because he's been telling the truth and the NSA definitely haven't?

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  12. Re:Trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's blown a whole lot of trust as it is, by stabbing his country in the back so spectacularly.

    The government and the NSA are NOT the Country. The PEOPLE are the Country.

    What makes him think that everyone should believe him now?

    Wrong question.
    The correct question is- WHO should we believe MORE, Snowden or the NSA? We know Snowden scooped up docs and turned them over to journalists in a responsible fashion. We also know the NSA has been lying to Congress and the Courts as well as the American People, violating their own policies and violating Court orders.
    Given their respective track records, only a complete fool would take the side of the NSA in this.

    The Russians have taken in traitors/defectors from the West;

    He's neither a traitor nor is he a defector. He has made absolutely no efforts or claims to renounce his citizenship, he has not taken up arms or given aid or succor to an Enemy of the State. Thus, he is also not a Traitor.
    If you have evidence otherwise, I'm sure the NSA in particular would love to hear about it.

  13. Re:Trust by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny, as one of his countrymen, I don't feel stabbed in the back at all, at least, not by him. I feel more like....I thought there was a knife in myback, I wasn't sure exactly how big or how far it was in, or what it looked like, but I felt it was likely there.

    What I see him having done is tell me about that knife, exactly whose hand was on it, and how deep it was into my back.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  14. Re:Trust by khallow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Obama administration and the NSA chief have already radically changed the stories they were telling because of Snowden.

    Snowden will and does lie & bend his tale to justify his acts

    That's why we look at evidence and not just make up shit. The Obama administration has vast resources at its disposal with which to disprove Snowden assertions. It hasn't chosen to do so for some reason. I wager it is because Snowden's assertions and accompanying evidence are close enough to truth.