Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Dell Ad Says Windows 8.1 Apps Will Run On Xbox One

Posted by Soulskill on from the welcome-to-crazy-town dept.

cold fjord writes "An article at DailyTech begins, 'While many people scoffed at or failed to recognized the significance of Microsoft Corp.'s talk of a "unified" development path for Windows, Xbox, and Windows Phone, the real world ramifications of that approach are now becoming clear — and they're significant. A pre-order page from Dell for the Xbox One "accidentally" (and, it appears, officially) revealed that Windows 8.1 apps will run on the Xbox.'" A Microsoft spokesperson told AllThingsD, 'The suggestion that all Windows 8 apps run on Xbox One is not accurate," but they didn't deny that there would be some cross-compatibility. PCWorld's article has words of caution: "It would certainly be interesting if the full-blown Windows Store landed on Xbox One. But don't hold your breath for it to be there at the console's launch, no matter what Dell's words vaguely imply."

148 comments

  1. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't want to turn my expensive PC into a console.

    And i don't want to turn my console into a half assed PC.

    1. Re:No. by icelator · · Score: 2

      too late they already are

    2. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're actually worse than half-assed.

    3. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't own a console, so this way i could have a kick-ass console and an expensive pc just by adding software and a long hdmi cable. Pretty much what steam is also going for, doesn't sound half bad to me.

    4. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news they are also way less expensive than they should have been (without all that cheap chinese hardware running Windows thanks to MS, which is what most of the ./ crowd seems to forget)

    5. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way less? No way dude.

    6. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not an expensive PC the core it uses is worse than used in the normal AMD CPU / GPU hybrids.

      Its theoretically could be powerful enough. Very few people have mastered how to work well with normal AMD Desktop CPU's (Don't know any games that manage to do anything other than run much worse than they should). The ones used will be even harder unless everything is abstracted. However I doubt the big publishers will accept that because it will stop the quick and dirty ports they love doing so much.

    7. Re:No. by Minwee · · Score: 2

      I don't want to turn my expensive PC into a console.

      And i don't want to turn my console into a half assed PC.

      Don't worry, with Windows 8 your PC will always be fully assed.

    8. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my pc is quad core i7 with dual gtx 760 dude.

    9. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about?

  2. Viruses? Oh dear... by AtomicSymphonic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From my perspective, even though the Xbox One is limited in its capabilities as a full-on computer, malware could bring havoc upon the XBL community... This feels like opening a Pandora's Box, to me...

    1. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      luckily the RT metro variant isn't enough of a general purpose computer for the viruses to be a problem....

      so you'll have metro apps. it's just XBL the next generation. which is exactly what is wrong with metro in the first place...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      There's already been malware on MS Windows based automatic teller machines. That wasn't a big enough wakeup call so here we go again.

    3. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Xest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well it was never a problem for XBox Live Indie games so I don't see why it would be a problem now.

      The Windows Store is fairly well vetted much like Apple's app store, and Metro apps are fairly heavily restricted in what they can do much like XBox Live Indie Games were.

      I don't think viruses will be a problem therefore, and even if malicious software got on I think with Metro's restrictions there's really fuck all it could do of any interest anyway.

      The biggest concern I have is it's going to take a console, which should be a device for playing games in a simple manner and turn it into a computer which will be cluttered with all sorts of irrelevant shit. I don't want that. That's what my PC is for and to a lesser extent my tablet. All I want my console to do is be able to play games, and maybe play movies and music across my network.

      If I wanted a PC in my living room, I'd stick one there.

    4. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      I'm more confused by the fact that they made it run only RT applications instead of full on desktop x86.

      Well, I understand the marketing. They all but slaughtered their desktop OS to get people make software for their shitty phone OS.

      Makes me wonder if we'll see x86 windows desktop hacks on XBone soon.

    5. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      what's there to be confused about? from one they get all the user data, usage histories and installation counts and a cut of each monetary action and from the other they don't get anything...

      their problem is that they want different thing than whats good for their customers. it used to be that ms was just shitty to customers of others but now they're turned shitty to their own users, thanks to strategies laid out under ballmer.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Your.Master · · Score: 2

      For all the flak Microsoft gets for their app store apps, that UI seems much more conducive to a controller + Kinect interface than the mouse & keyboard desktop was. I don't know why anybody would want that, unless they were plugging a mouse and keyboard into their xbox.

    7. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one gives a shit about full x86 desktop anymore except for ones who already use a viable alternative. How about that?

    8. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      The biggest concern I have is it's going to take a console, which should be a device for playing games in a simple manner and turn it into a computer which will be cluttered with all sorts of irrelevant shit.

      It's nothing new - the Mega CD was the first console (IIRC) that could do something other than play games, in this case play music CDs. It can even be used as a (sort of) karaoke machine, thanks to CD+G support.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    9. Re: Viruses? Oh dear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet when I plug my xbox controller into my 8.1 PC it doesn't work with the interface.

    10. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Xest · · Score: 1

      But at least that sort of functionality has still been entertainment oriented.

      The point is that if you start to focus on general computing then you're detracting from the whole point of a console and doing a half-arsed job of something that PCs et. al. already do far better.

    11. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      But at least that sort of functionality has still been entertainment oriented.

      The point is that if you start to focus on general computing then you're detracting from the whole point of a console and doing a half-arsed job of something that PCs et. al. already do far better.

      The first megasuccess in console land was the NES, known in Japan as the Famicom, or "family computer", In Japan you could get all sorts of peripherals for it, but that didn't make Super Mario any less fun.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    12. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Xest · · Score: 1

      Interesting and something I never knew, but I'm not sure it changes things much. Ultimately consoles became what they were because it was recognised that devices for specific purposes do better at specific purposes and that consoles are best suited to gaming and entertainment, whilst PCs are best kept for general computing. Obviously the Famicom idea died a death, presumably for exactly this reason, that all people wanted to do in their living room was play Mario such that it's not that the general computing features made Mario any less fun, but that because the device was primarily targetted at entertainment, it did a really shit job of anything else.

      It's the same now, Microsoft release IE for the 360, and it's shit and useless compared to a tablet or PC and nothing will change that in the same way that FPS games are awful on touch screen phones and tablets. This is also why people are still writing iOS and Android apps on Macs/PCs and not on mobile phones and tablets - because they're a shit medium for most content creation.

      The idea of every type of action being able to be done on every type of device has never worked and has always ended miserably with half arsed bodge job features that no one ever uses.

      I wouldn't even need an XBox if I could do everything I ever wanted on any device. I'd just do it all on my phone in my pocket, but that's not the case.

    13. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by afidel · · Score: 1

      You sound like the old foggies who only want their phone to make phone calls, convergence is inevitable since consoles ARE general purpose computers and it costs almost nothing to add the PC style functionality.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      They all but slaughtered their desktop OS to get people make software for their shitty phone OS.

      Slightly OT, but I could not find a big box store in my area that carried a new PC with Win7. It was ALL windows 8 with no downgrade option.

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    15. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Xest · · Score: 1

      Right, and you sound like the kid that's just learn the term convergence at school and doesn't really understand the practicalities of it and just wants everything to converge.

      I'm all for convergence where it makes sense, but some convergence is stupid. I jumped right on the smartphone bandwagon because it was about fucking time that my mobile could decent browse the web and pick up e-mail. If however the next iteration of smartphones came with a toaster, because, well, they run hot enough when they're busy then no, that's not convergence I'd be interested in. Convergence isn't about just bunging everything together into one device, it's about putting together things that make sense, and general purpose apps on a system that doesn't have a general purpose interface does not make sense.

      Convergence has always been important in computing, but it's not always been successful. There is a much larger list of attempts at convergence that people didn't buy into than did.

      The day consoles converge to become general purpose PCs is the day they no longer have a market because they'll always be inferior at that than PCs which are always ahead in the hardware markets.

      A laptop with a 3G or better internet connection is already the end result of convergence between desktop, mobile, and games but surprisingly, people don't just have laptops and nothing else - if you believe convergence is always inevitable then tell me, why do you think people are not already carrying around that device given that it does everything their phone, tablet, games console, and desktop does?

      Could it be because, say, it's too big to fit in your pocket? If so then don't you think that means there's kind of a place for phones as well as laptops? If people want a PC in their living room then why is it only a handful of people that have PCs in their living room? Why is it even those that do mostly just use it to replicate the features of existing entertainment focussed consoles like watching media or playing games? Most people want their living room for what it has always been there for - a place to relax and entertain.

    16. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      UI is sorta kinda optimized for touch. It's pretty bad for mouse and utter junk for controllers.

    17. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      We have a place in town that advertises on the radio to hurry in and buy your new computer from them because they are still selling Windows 7 but won't be able to do so for long. Given all the airtime they are buying, I have to assume their are a lot of people who don't want Windows 8. I wonder what makes Microsoft think they are going to want it on their Xbox.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    18. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're talking about running Windows Store apps, not being able to run xXDarkMagicModzzRUsXx's unsigned keygen for photoshop.. Sure there is risk, but it's the same risk that you have in the iOS world.

    19. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You can get your license upgraded to "pro" which in turn comes with free upgrade option to 7.

      It's not advertised but it's there.

      You could also just grab the OEM code from your old machine and see if that would work as well if you have one.

    20. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Minwee · · Score: 1

      It's nothing new - the Mega CD was the first console (IIRC) that could do something other than play games,

      It's even older than that. The Mega CD was released in 1991, but the Atari 2600 had BASIC programming in 1979 although the complexity of programs was severely limited by the capabilities of the console itself. By 1983 Coleco released an add-on for the ColecoVision which converted it into a Lovecraftian hybrid of a games console and the Adam home PC.

      Many PCs of the early 80s such as the VIC-20, Commodore 64 and Atari 400/800 still had cartridge slots meaning that they could still be considered consoles even though they were marketed as computers. The eventual dominance of the IBM PC led to a clearer distinction between the two, but the idea that modern consoles are just home computers configured to run games goes back to the dawn of the console age.

    21. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by MrMickS · · Score: 1

      Could it be because, say, it's too big to fit in your pocket? If so then don't you think that means there's kind of a place for phones as well as laptops? If people want a PC in their living room then why is it only a handful of people that have PCs in their living room? Why is it even those that do mostly just use it to replicate the features of existing entertainment focussed consoles like watching media or playing games? Most people want their living room for what it has always been there for - a place to relax and entertain.

      Oh dear. I really hope that you aren't in charge of anything involving strategic decisions. It takes time for ideas to mature and their time to come.

      All of your arguments could be made against tablets. Who wants an expensive device that you can really only consume content on? Apparently now that a usable interface has been designed millions of people.

      Consoles since the PS2/XBox haven't been primarily about playing games but rather being an entertainment hub in the living room. The XBox-360 and PS3 advanced that, the XBox One and PS4 will continue the trend. Computing is ubiquitous but computers are becoming less necessary for the majority of people.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    22. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Oh dear. I really hope that you aren't in charge of anything involving strategic decisions. It takes time for ideas to mature and their time to come."

      Right and you are? Because we want someone who supports the idea of bunging completely different paradigms together to create one of the many nonsense devices that have failed over the years? Again, it makes sense when it works, but doing it with everything just for the sake of it is just plain fucking stupid. FWIW I actually am in charge of making strategic decisions and I've been very successful in my career, so you'll have to excuse me if I accept reality's opinion over some random Joe on Slashdot who thinks he's gods gift to technical decision making.

      "All of your arguments could be made against tablets. Who wants an expensive device that you can really only consume content on? Apparently now that a usable interface has been designed millions of people."

      Except that's not my argument is it? My argument is that it only makes sense to converge where convergence is both beneficial, and makes sense. Obviously with tablets as media consumption devices that makes a lot of sense because it actually works and people want it. You may be right that there is a magical new input device that both works for keyboard style text input and still is great for playing games, but this magical input device that suddenly makes convergence of PC style general computing and games consoles a pleasant reality does not come with the XBox One (the box contents have been published). Of course, you could solve the problem with a keyboard, the PS3 did this, but then what's the point? you might as well go whole hog and have a PC in your living room with a blue tooth keyboard and enjoy the benefits of a multi-purpose OS that lets you do everything, not just some half-arsed apps based thing that no one actually uses purely because it's half-arsed. The XBox 360 came closest with the chat pad but even that was clunky and I think most people that had one rapidly ended up just throwing it aside.

      "Computing is ubiquitous but computers are becoming less necessary for the majority of people."

      This is a myth. It's often said that PC sales are down because of tablets and so forth making them unnecessary. The reality is PC sales are down because whereas before your PC was out of date and wouldn't run anything new acceptably after 3 years, for some time now even a 6 year old PC will run everything current to a perfectly acceptable level. There may be things people do on phones and tablets now instead of PCs but there are things they don't - which means they are still a necessary item in everyone's home. Also, you're vastly overstating things with "majority". Nowhere near a majority of people who had PCs now have tablets. Not even close.

      This is one thing Jobs as much as I dislike him actually got. He could've merged the phone and iPod much earlier than he did, and Apple even had ideas for tablets much earlier than when they released the iPad, but what Jobs was good at was timing - he knew when a market was ready for convergence, when it made sense and when that convergence would not result in a conflicting mess of paradigms.

      Consoles are not there, because we still haven't got any solution for that fundamental divide of having a locked down system that requires a simplistic interface for gaming and entertainment controls and having an open generic computing platform that has controls that offer the flexibility of the mouse and keyboard needed to control that. Kinect in the XBox One is still the closest thing but reviews to date suggest the voice recognition isn't even close to 100% reliable yet, let alone finger tracking to, say, allow someone to type on an imaginary keyboard for example and so forth. Consoles excelled because you could slap a game in and play, the more barriers you put in the way of that the less they excel at the market they created.

      The problem is that most Slashdot geeks think your average Joe is happy nagivating through a full blown desktop style operating system in their living room with a physical keyboard. They're not, that's not what they want there. Your average Joe wants something simpler, easier, and less cluttered than that to manage their entertainment.

    23. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Has there been "general purpose" malware? Or are you just talking about ATM hacks (which have nothing to do with the OS)?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Tiles seem like a good layout for controllers, voice, or gesture-based controls (and I'd be surprised if you didn't have all 3 options for the Xbone UI). Left, right, up, down, select - that's all you need with tiles. (Wonder what you enable with the Konami code?) My Samsung TV has basically the same interface, and it works OK with all those forms of input.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    25. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I like the Win7 interface with mouse and KB, but the Metro stuff seems like a better approach to casual use with more clumsy input devices. I haven't really been looking at the Xbone, but if it has the same voice and gesture-based controls my TV has, the Metro stuff should work well with that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    26. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      The day consoles converge to become general purpose PCs is the day they no longer have a market because they'll always be inferior at that than PCs which are always ahead in the hardware markets.

      You're missing one of the subtler points of this news: the Windows apps in question will be Metro apps, not traditional windowed desktop applications. Microsoft are looking to get mobile-style apps onto the XB1, so that the XB1 is not just a games console, but not a PC replacement. The stuff they're hoping to see on it will make it more like a set-top box, or a smart TV when you're not playing games. Convergence of games console and set-top box makes perfect sense, which is why all the last generation of consoles had multimedia capabilities, even down to the PS3 being the most popular living room Blu-Ray player for quite some time after its launch.

      This strategy is a very, very good one. For one thing, MS need to get people familiar with the Metro interface if they're ever going to shift any Windows Phone units in any serious numbers. For another, I've little doubt that they'd like to see Windows RT being picked up by the various smart TV manufacturers instead of their current Android and Linux-based roll-your-own jobs. In order to make it appealling to manufacturers, they need to get a critical mass of living room media apps in the app store, and the XB1's market share should draw in app developers. Being early into the Windows Marketplace is an opportunity to make a mark that isn't possible in the overcrowded iOS and Android app marketplaces.

      A laptop with a 3G or better internet connection is already the end result of convergence between desktop, mobile, and games but surprisingly, people don't just have laptops and nothing else

      I survived for years on a laptop and a dumbphone. The laptop can't replace a phone because it's not pocketable. But I haven't owned a desktop PC since the P2 days.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    27. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Not really, no. It will take you forever to press "right, right, right" just to navigate to tile across the screen. The entire point of tiles is that you can poke your finger at any point of the screen at any given time.

      This does not apply to controller input, voice input or gestures. You can do some things with voice input by making shortcuts, but that is a very limited control scheme for tiles. Other two are simply terrible.

      Effectively:
      Controller/keyboard = tree based menus (were all but removed from W8 in favor of tiles, one of the biggest usability complaints).
      Voice input = clear differentiated names on each object on the screen, such as for example a number.
      Gesture based input = Typically functions similar to controller/keyboard in most implementations. Can be used as poor man's touch in some situations, but is woefully inaccurate and frustrating in that usage scheme.

    28. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Xest · · Score: 1

      I hope you're right, as I say it was simply a concern so I certainly am not writing the idea off altogether, I just hope they can do it right.

      Part the reason for my skepticism is they already tried the same to a lesser degree on the Xbox 360 with Facebook, and Twitter apps, provision of IE on the console and integrated search but frankly all of it sucks and certainly no one I've ever heard of, spoken to, or seen uses the Facebook or Twitter apps precisely for this reason and I don't know that any use the IE search features - it's easier to just pick up your phone or tablet next to you if that's what you want to do. Search particularly doesn't even work well either, the search feature doesn't find stuff which should be easy for it to find (which isn't exactly a great advert for the big "Powered by Bing" stamp!).

      "I survived for years on a laptop and a dumbphone. The laptop can't replace a phone because it's not pocketable."

      This was precisely my point really though, that sometimes convergence really does just make no sense because different devices have different niches, and whilst you can converge some things like the PDA and the phone (in your case you've not got a desktop, you're happy with a laptop too) you can't go a step further and eliminate the phone by integrating it into the laptop because there's always that divide from laptop being too big to be a phone replacement, and phone being too small to be a laptop replacement. I have a suspicion it's the same with consoles - that consoles became what they are because people wanted an extremely simple device in their living room that provides entertainment features, primarily games, and that as soon as you move away from that you defeat the object of what made the console market the successful market it is in the first place. You only have to look at Windows 8 to see how hard it is to bridge the tablet/PC divide also such that most people would prefer their PC to be a PC and their tablet to be a tablet without convergence of the two creating such a mess. There are limits to convergence and some other posters here don't seem to get that, they seem to be suggesting you can converge everything well.

      Again, I like convergence where it makes sense, but I'm yet to be convinced that turning consoles into devices used for anything other than entertainment devices (i.e. for video, games, music) makes sense. Still, I'm getting both next gen consoles regardless (I tend to buy them all anyway- yes I even have a WiiU) so I guess I'll find out how it works out at some point anyway :)

    29. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      OS vunerabilities exploited directly and some general malware as well from script kiddies/virus wranglers that had no idea that they had hit the jackpot if they used the ATMs as something other than spam zombies.
      Of course some incidents were as utterly stupid as putting the things naked on the net with ports open, no firewall and no antivirus.

    30. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If the number of things you want easy access to is small enough to fit as tiles in the first place (the big assumption), then "right, right, right" is just fine. A menu is just an N-dimensional tile system instead of a 2-dimensional tile system, after all. Plus both voice and controller can be either set up as "right, right, right" or as direct pointing, depending on dexterity.

      If you really want menu trees, radial menus are better anyhow, and an analog stick is a great way to navigate those (not that the Xbone is likely to support that). But I don't think menus are particularly relevant to a console.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Radial menus are a form of a menu tree.

    32. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly what I said, isn't it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re:Viruses? Oh dear... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      The point is that your only alternative to "dexterous people controlling stuff by spamming commands" which is pretty much opposite of good control scheme is a tree menu.

  3. Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're too stupid to properly understand the quote, read the PC World disclaimer article before going apeshit.

    "With all your favorite Windows 8 apps..." does not mean everything will be portable - it doesn't automatically mean any app will even run as-is.

    It is standard marketing horseshit indicating that some of your apps won't be available, otherwise they would have shat ALL out with bold and different colors and a brass band and fluffers for all.

    I fully expect these to be a re-built subset of applications, not binary compatible but code compatible. Or if it is code compatible, then something like a "Windows CE" subset of targeted API so that certain apps will work and others won't. But I'm going with binary incompatibility for now.

    1. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      So, about the same as the Surface RT? If that's the bar they're setting, then this will doubtless be a huge success.

    2. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by DavidD_CA · · Score: 2

      If they can build the Surface RT and have it run all the Windows RT apps, then what's to stop them from allowing the X-Box One from doing the same?

      --
      -David
    3. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      These are also "apps", not "applications". This means these are the silly windows store things that no one uses anyway (at least not on a PC), many of which are built with Javascript instead of being native executables.

    4. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd think it would be so stupid that Win8 apps wouldn't work on it, it IS just JavaScript and a wrapper, right? Or did MS create the child to ActiveX again?
      Mind you, Microsoft has incompatible parsing between IE5 on Windows and Mac, so go figure.

      If they had every app portable, that would really be a killer app that even I would need to consider looking in to since, despite the shitfest of a conference and hilarious reaction, people will still buy Xbone.

    5. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by dabadab · · Score: 2

      I fully expect these to be a re-built subset of applications, not binary compatible but code compatible.

      Actually they are most probably talking about the "Windows Store apps". These contain both x86 and ARM binaries, run sandboxed, fullscreen with the Metro UI, so I see no reason you could not run them on the X1. However I also do not see much reason to be excited by this functionality - only time will tell, but I do not see huge potential in running dumbed down, simple apps on a gaming console.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    6. Re: Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WinRT API is natively C++ and based on COM. Javascript is a second class citizen.

    7. Re: Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they could run. But they're not built for a controller interface.

    8. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      However I also do not see much reason to be excited by this functionality - only time will tell, but I do not see huge potential in running dumbed down, simple apps on a gaming console.

      I think the primary goal will be in trapping the "smart TV" market sector. Having media consumption apps on a cross-platform system will give them advantages in terms of market share, and they'll be hoping that this snowballs. I suspect the end-goal is getting the TV makers to drop their own smart TV platforms and start using WinRT.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    9. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could easily do binary compatibility with the XBone running and x86-64 processor. I doubt they will let all Windows apps be compatible though, probably just TIFKAM (The Interface Formerly Know As Metro) apps, and then likely just ones sold through the Windows Store.

    10. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

      Preventing software from doing things they find either unprofitable (for MS) or naughty inside the xbone walled garden, mostly. My first thought would be game save editors and exportors, altering local keys, setting up proxies for authentication, stealing credentials or generally interacting with other software/software's memory space.

    11. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "With all your favorite Windows 8 apps..." does not mean everything will be portable - it doesn't automatically mean any app will even run as-is.

      It's false advertising, is what it is. If they're talking to me, and my favorite app doesn't run, then they're liars. And since they are claiming to be talking to me, they are liars.

      This is precisely the kind of thing we should be able to successfully sue over. It's a lie. Why do we enshrine lies?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Please read the PCWORLD disclaimer by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

      Why do we enshrine lies?

      Because the laws that should protect against such things are written by politicians. Is everything understood now?

  4. not a dumb idea actually by icelator · · Score: 3, Funny

    you know what if they actually did it and did it right it could get the windows 8 app store going, also letting people program apps for their xbox could be interesting as well.

  5. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excel for Xbox!

  6. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Why is this story on here? It's well known this community by and large hates Microsoft, hates "Metro", hates Windows 8 apps and most of them also hate the XBox One (even the lame attempt at a derogatory nickname "XBone"). Seriously another Windows 8 related story is just another Metro hatefest, FWIW Im not a fan of it either and by this time it is well established that most of this community doesn't like it either so why bother putting in yet another story that we all know is just going to have a comments section that degenerates into haters beating eachother off over it.

    1. Re:Why? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      The 360 is popular, & more people here run Windows than anything else I'm sure. So, why not?

      I don't run Windows 8.1 - programs can be created that run interchangeably on an 8.1 computer, Windows phone, tablet, and now XBone? If that means XBox will be able to easily run apps, it's sort of cool I guess.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:Why? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But there's nothing in the store worth the effort of downloading.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, Yes, Dell can fuck me off with its crippled bioses, upgradability, and proprietary hardware and software drivers.

    4. Re:Why? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      Strange, I've seen XBox fans talk about it as the "XBone" too. Yeah, sure, it's a nickname, but it is a logical contraction. After all the product is called XBox One... XB One... or for quick typers XBone.

      The first time I actually read it, I was wondering what they were writing about, until I realized what it was and I now constantly read it mentally as XB-one... Not as X-Bone.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect people actually are trying to make you think X-Bone. If it were a contraction I suspect they'd type xb1 or xbox1.

    6. Re:Why? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Some people might then think you're talking about the first XBox, which is the old P-III based one. Personally, Microsoft didn't think the name through. I guess, names like these should be tested on a bunch of 13 year olds to figure out whether it could become misused. I know you think that "X-Bone" is what you should be reading, but I don't and I'm pretty sure many people don't read that either. I think that says more about you than anything else: As I said, it's in wide use with the MS/XBox fanbois.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    7. Re:Why? by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I agree with the assertion that you can't call it xb1 or xbox1 because, you're right, it's too easily confused with the original xbox. I do read it as X-Bone, but mainly because of the anti-consumer traps MS was going to stick in it. The first time I read XBone was after the E3 revile around the time they were discussing (the phone home, phone home every 24 hours, no phone home at all) debacle. Unfortunately for MS by the time they pulled all that stuff out it was too late. XBone, which should be written as XBOne or XBO, was stuck.

      Actually that's not really any better. XBO looks like an emoticon for an angry screaming 12 year old, which is the image MS is trying to get away from. Whoever they had in the marketing department that came up with the name should just be fired. There is no simple contraction for the consoles name that isn't confusing or have negative connotations.

      Balls were dropped all over the place (works on so many levels) with this console.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there's nothing in the store worth the effort of downloading.

      It does have one good (1 free table, pay for more) pinball game!

    9. Re:Why? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      But there's nothing in the store worth the effort of downloading.

      ...yet. But with the XB1 users on the appstore by default, Microsoft will be hoping that they've got the inertia to get developers interested.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    10. Re:Why? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Some people might then think you're talking about the first XBox, which is the old P-III based one. Personally, Microsoft didn't think the name through. I guess, names like these should be tested on a bunch of 13 year olds to figure out whether it could become misused. I know you think that "X-Bone" is what you should be reading, but I don't and I'm pretty sure many people don't read that either. I think that says more about you than anything else: As I said, it's in wide use with the MS/XBox fanbois.

      On the other hand, the fact that you assume "x bone" is something a 13 year old would come up with says more about you than anything else. I can't help reading "X-Bone", and I have an image of a cartoon bone in a dog's mouth. The 13-year-old comment suggests you think something else when you see "bone"...

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    11. Re:Why? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the fact that you assume "x bone" is something a 13 year old would come up with says more about you than anything else.

      Well, 13 year old boys seem to be the target market for most recent console games.

    12. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all the other ones, too.

    13. Re:Why? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, probably... I work in the porn industry and am a notorious pervert. Probably just a professional deformation.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  7. Welcome to last May by symbolset · · Score: 2

    This is not news. It's a PC. It's made by Microsoft. Why would it not run Windows apps?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Welcome to last May by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Exactly, it's a Microsoft console.

      Windows apps will Play for Sure!

    2. Re:Welcome to last May by kernelistic · · Score: 1

      Hah! I see what you did there!

  8. Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder how well apps intended for a touchscreen will work with a controller (unless they rig up Kinect to act as a Minority report style interface)

    1. Re: Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from the minority style interface, there is always SmartGlass.

  9. of course this is going to happen by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does anyone think it won't?

    Metro apps will be portable to Xbox One. Because Xbox One runs a variant of Windows 8/Windows Phone 8. It won't be hard.

    And MS will run the system as a trusted computing system meaning you can only get the apps from their app store. And thus they'll take 30%. And they'll have full approval over all the apps to be sold.

    Why did anyone think MS wasn't planning to do this? It's good business sense.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:of course this is going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until they get GNU/SteamRolled ... O~~O(

    2. Re:of course this is going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " It's good business sense."
      That no actual customer wants.

    3. Re:of course this is going to happen by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2

      Welcome to capitalism - if you don't like it, spend three decades making your own platform and marketing it hard enough to convince the vast majority who don't make decisions on technical merit.

    4. Re:of course this is going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone do that when there's plenty of alternatives? We aren't still in 1997, son.

    5. Re:of course this is going to happen by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, capitalism is all about freedom of choice.

    6. Re:of course this is going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like shit with strawberries or shit with vanilla ice cream?

    7. Re:of course this is going to happen by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why does anyone think it won't?

      ...

      Why did anyone think MS wasn't planning to do this? It's good business sense.

      Wait what does MS planning to do something have to do with it actually working?

    8. Re:of course this is going to happen by Inda · · Score: 0

      MS will run a Shit Sandwitch shop, meaning you can only buy Shit Sandwitches from their Shit Sandwitch shop. And thus they'll take 30% of all Shit Sandwitch sales. And they'll have full approval over the Shit Sandwitches sold.

      It's good business sense, if you're in the Shit Sandwitch business.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    9. Re:of course this is going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no "individual mandate" to purchase an Xbox or Windows.

  10. let me know when.. by issicus · · Score: 2

    the xbox will run windows games.

    1. Re:let me know when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will not. It might run Microsoft Store games. But that includes only tablet-grade crap.

  11. Great News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All we need now is a steam app ;)

  12. Re:finally by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can totally see how a single UI paradigm will give a top quality experience when the user has:

    -a mouse/trackpad, keyboard and small/medium/large non-touch screen
    -a trackpad, keyboard and small touchscreeen
    -a small touchscreen
    -a console game controller and a TV

    They totally have to complete the job and kill Windows Phone, and just ship Windows 8.2 RT for both tablets and phones.

    Finally, Microsoft Word for your phone. They will blow Android out of the water.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  13. It won't work because MS is MS by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A Unified development path? Oh please, if MS wanted one, they COULD have made ALL their games available for both their console AND windows AND their phones ALREADY! They don't because MS isn't a company it is a number of departments involved in century old feuds. I know MS isn't centuries old but there departments are sure feuding like their great-great-great grand-daddy's have done.

    MS can't do a unified approach because it is not a unified company. Just examine its countless position changes on whether Windows is or is not a gaming platform. In a way MS is even killing itself with it. The only thing I would need windows for is gaming. No windows games? Then I could just as well run Linux or a Mac. In fact, I do run Linux because more and more games are available on Linux or at least Linux friendly.

    And no, I don't own a x-box. But smart move MS, make your own platform less relevant. Oh wait, then there is Games for Windows. Oh then it is not. Why do you think Valve is going ahead with Steam OS? Because they like building a OS more then building games? No because they are fucking tired of being depended on a company that is schizophrenic about its own OS.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Paradigma11 · · Score: 1

      A Unified development path? Oh please, if MS wanted one, they COULD have made ALL their games available for both their console AND windows AND their phones ALREADY! They don't because MS isn't a company it is a number of departments involved in century old feuds. I know MS isn't centuries old but there departments are sure feuding like their great-great-great grand-daddy's have done.

      MS can't do a unified approach because it is not a unified company. Just examine its countless position changes on whether Windows is or is not a gaming platform. In a way MS is even killing itself with it. The only thing I would need windows for is gaming. No windows games? Then I could just as well run Linux or a Mac. In fact, I do run Linux because more and more games are available on Linux or at least Linux friendly.

      And no, I don't own a x-box. But smart move MS, make your own platform less relevant. Oh wait, then there is Games for Windows. Oh then it is not. Why do you think Valve is going ahead with Steam OS? Because they like building a OS more then building games? No because they are fucking tired of being depended on a company that is schizophrenic about its own OS.

      The only reason valve is building Steam OS is because they are now in direct competition with MS app store.

    2. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are building Steam OS because Microsoft pulled a "we are altering the deal - pray we do not alter it any further" over Windows.

      When Steam arrived, Windows was an open platform.

      Windows 8 (Metro) is a closed platform. Only sole software seller is Microsoft which takes a cut on everything (and does not allow Steam to sell anything to the users). Right now it is hard-locked to the OS only on Windows RT - on 8/8.1 you can still install desktop applications from anywhere or even run Steam.

      Steam is fearing - for a good reason - that this may no longer be true in the not-too-distant future. They can either sit around and wait for Microsoft to alter the deal ("kill legacy desktop app compatibility or make it too unwieldly for day-to-day use") and die, or they can do something about it. Considering how bad Windows has been, making a competing OS based on tried-and-true Linux seems like a no-brainer move.

      All Linux ever needed was one, big enough party to say "this is the Linux you should target your software development against". Steam is big enough for that.

    3. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Target the latest Direct X. Not hard. Valve wanted their own store because there's opportunity in curating.

    4. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      No, the GP is right. MS didn't have a "deal" with Valve. Valve simply did what many others did - used MS OS as platform for their store.

      Now MS opened a store of their own, that isn't in direct competition with Valve YET but is clearly headed in that general direction, and Valve execs can read the writing on the wall. So their only option is to make themselves independent of MS platform and push their customers off it ASAP, preferably before MS's own store becomes acceptable for its customers.

      Valve isn't new to this kind of bait and switch aimed at customers either. It pretty much forced original steam as "updating system for counter strike" back when it started steam for example. So this is basically two evil giants duking it out while customer will once again be the one bearing the brunt of the damage.

    5. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it is direct competition right now... just not very competitive :).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the GP is right. MS didn't have a "deal" with Valve.

      MS has an implicit deal with all their developers. If you think otherwise then it's probably because you aren't a developer who writes software for Windows which renders your view irrelevant.

    7. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Target the latest Direct X. Not hard. Valve wanted their own store because there's opportunity in curating.

      He wasn't talking about the Steam store -- he was talking about Steam OS.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    8. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Not really. It's not really even working on being one yet. It's mainly apple style app store.

      Steam on the other hand is a full on distribution system for full featured software. That's quite a bit different. But pretty much everyone expects that one MS graduates from "must copy apple" suicidal rush, it will remember that its strength lies in full featured software and that's when steam's days on windows are numbered.

    9. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Do share, since when did any developer have to make a deal with microsoft to develop for windows?

      I'm genuinely intrigued as to what kind of anti-MS bubble one must live in to believe such drivel.

    10. Re:It won't work because MS is MS by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Am I dreaming or the Dell site says they are already sold out?

  14. I submitted this by SmartAboutThings · · Score: 0

    unbelievable, I submitted this yesterday :|

    1. Re:I submitted this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe your submission was shit.

  15. Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all coming together.
    The programs interfaces you don't want to use on the console you don't want to own!

    1. Re:Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think the simple and fast Modern UI apps might suit a console perfectly. :)

    2. Re:Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by whydavid · · Score: 1

      Except moving a cursor around with a controller sucks.

      They could win me over, however, if they brought in the duck hunt gun as a tile selection method, made the live tiles move around the screen rapidly, and introduced "whammy" live tiles costing $1 every time they were hit. Getting to the game would be just as fun as playing it, especially if it's a crappy windows store game.

    3. Re:Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that you would use Kinect as a pointer/gesture interface, seeing as every Xbox One comes with one. (Smartglass offers another alternative.)

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touch-UI based apps using a controller. WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG.

    5. Re:Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      There's a Kinect there. That seems to lend itself to touch based UI.

    6. Re:Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a Kinect there. That seems to lend itself to touch based UI.

      Only when MS removes any and all spyware from Kinect will I ever consider using it.

    7. Re: Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For apps that implicitly support the kinect, sure. I can't see it working having automatic kinect to touch translation.

    8. Re:Horray! Metro Apps on XBoxOne! by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Yes, that way when the hot corners don't work you have to figure out if it's the interface that's not responding or the Kinect that's not seeing your gestures to start with.

  16. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if they do get it right, it would take years and years to 'blow android out of the water'. For the same reason that apple could release a new phone almost identical in every way to the last one, and still sell millions on the first day.

  17. This is so exciting! by whydavid · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to use all of my favorite apps with an input device they weren't intended for! This will be about one step up from text input on the Wii.

    1. Re:This is so exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait to use all of my favorite apps with an input device they weren't intended for!

      You can already do this by running "Modern UI" apps on a desktop PC without a touch screen.

  18. Windows 8 = What were they thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently bought a laptop that came with Windows 8, so I reserved judgement until Windows 8.1 came out.

    I upgraded to 8.1 yesterday, and yes it has a significantly better user experience than Windows 8, but it still has negative value for me because I do not want to ever see a Metro screen. I'm a developer, and that garbage just impedes my workflow. I have a trackpad, not a touch screen. I wish Microsoft would quit pretending that users can't tell the difference. It makes ALL the difference.

    Dear Microsoft,
    Give me free downgrade rights to Windows 7 from vanilla Windows 8 (i.e. not Pro), or lose me as a user (i.e. I won't ever pay the Microsoft tax again).

    1. Re:Windows 8 = What were they thinking by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      MS doesn't care. Take a look at massive destruction of windows that was windows 8. They genuinely appear to not care and believe that people like you are acceptable losses in their war for mobile space.

    2. Re:Windows 8 = What were they thinking by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the things that MS has going for it in the minds of many is that it is an OS for getting work done. The Metro stuff really breaks that perception to pieces. I love when I'm in desktop mode and I go to slide the mouse across the screen with the track pad and that pulls up the charm bar with time and date - and what I want is now under it and I need to click around to make it go away.

      Or when I go to close a window that's been maximized on the desktop and barely overshoot the little x at the top right and now it's covered by the charms bar...

      Search is supposed to replace the start menu - and I am all for that but the search is so poorly implemented. My laptop isn't capable of upgrading to 8.1 so maybe this gets fixed but on 8 it's really bad. If I start typing the word 'pad' - Wordpad does not show up in my search results. Crazy.

      Having updates in two places - stupid. And it appears that some updates in the app store wont run until updates in windows update are done. I had two apps pending forever. Then I went over to windows update and found 1 important update that it said would be automatically installed - but it wasn't. I had to kick it off myself. As soon as it finished, the app updates that had been pending finally kicked in and completed. One was the Kindle app which would not open until it did update. It took me 15 minutes or so to figure out the magical order to get it all to work.

      I've been using 8 for 2 or 3 weeks now on a brand new Samsung I bought for my wife. There are some nice things and there are a lot of very broken things and all of them scream to me that no one actually used this on a laptop. I can't imagine how they could have and not noticed how painful so much of the UI is. Want to uninstall an app from the home screen? Right click then move the mouse all the way down to the bottom left of the screen - just not too far to the bottom left.

      Want to search the store? Open the charms bar. Now you will be tempted to start typing in the search bar. Don't - it defaults to searching what is already installed on your machine. You need to look at the list on the right and scroll down to store, select that and now you can search the store. It is not built into the store - it isn't obvious in any way that this is what you need to do. When in the store it just feels like search isn't possible.

      I hear 8.1 fixes the install mess where installing software fills the home page with tons of shortcuts. Since I can't upgrade to it, since Samsung can't be bothered to make their stuff work with it, I don't know but I'd sure love it. Installing MS office left me with multiple columns of junk on my home screen. And I don't know what algorythm drives placing tiles on that screen - but it is insane and constantly fights me. I can rarely get tiles organized just like I would prefer - stuff slips around and leaves unpleasant gaps.

      I'm hoping it will improve down the road. I like having multiple players in the OS market. I run Linux for the most part myself but for a number of situations and people in my life I need windows. I really have never been a fan of Apple's approach so I try to be patient with MS.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:Windows 8 = What were they thinking by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      And what are you going to do when Win7 is no longer supported?. Eventually you are going to be forced into Metro/Modern or switch to a different OS. Unless Microsoft releases the Source Code for Windows, so we can all fix the bugs (not likely) you are stuck with forced upgrades, limited choice and lock-ins.

      It's generally been my experience that Microsoft can do whatever it wants to it's customers and they will continue to accept this type of treatment. I left that illogical insanity October of 2012 and I'm never going back. I figured I didn't NEED to be a slave and moved on to Xubuntu, I only wish I did it years ago. It's surprising how far along WINE has come -- I have a closet full of Games and have no problem running any of them and have even been making reports for the WineDB for others to be informed.

      Seems like all the complaints about Linux these days are either myths or the belief that Linux functions the same as it did in '98. I used it in the 90's and it wasn't good enough for me then, but as of my switch last year, it's finally ready. It really is the best time for switching if anybody wants to switch. From where I sit, a revolution is happening with the Linux OS being a usable replacement for Windows and Indie games giving us the originality that companies like EA can't. The future I see is made of Indies and Linux. In my humble, expert opinion.

    4. Re:Windows 8 = What were they thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what are you going to do when Win7 is no longer supported?

      I'm not a windows fan myself (run Linux at home, required to use Windows for work), but Win7 does have security fix support until 2020. It's a fairly rational decision to stick with it for (say) 5 years until 2018 if you've already paid for it and it satisfies your requirements, and by then so much will have changed and the choices will be different; maybe there will be a rebooted 'business windows V10' or similar which turns out to be an acceptable sucessor to Win7, or maybe windows' relevance will have become minimal, who knows. either way, it's too soon to worry about Win7 end of support.

    5. Re:Windows 8 = What were they thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft offers free copies of Windows 7 on that one website with a picture of a ship and two black sails.

  19. Re: finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to run your Whoosh 8.1 app first thing when you set up your XboxOne. Mastering the Whoosh interface really helps with everything else you'll do.

  20. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly, and even then, Android is still evolving.

  21. Re:finally by Arkham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finally, Microsoft Word for your phone. They will blow Android out of the water.

    The ONLY way anyone is blowing Android out of the water is if they provide a better product and give it away for free. Android isn't where it is because it's superior; it's there because manufacturers can use it for free.

    --
    - Vincit qui patitur.
  22. Cancel my preorder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decision made, it is now the PS4.

  23. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Finally, Microsoft Word for your phone. They will blow Android out of the water.

    Office apps are already on the Windows Phone, at least enough functionality to make draft documents or edit documents. I'm not going to be typing lab reports with my thumbs. However, I have written short stories (4-5 pages), which the phone saves to SkyDrive and I open on my computer later.

    I also made a budget in Excel on my computer. Later my wife and I couldn't remember how much we budgeted for shopping, so I opened the spreadsheet on my phone, and there it was.

  24. Re:finally by TWiTfan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I the only one here who still recognizes sarcasm?

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  25. Hmm... by chrish · · Score: 1

    Technically, my XBox 360, my BlackBerry Z10 and my son's Nintendo 3DS also run all of my favourite Windows 8 apps.

    --
    - chrish
  26. the only thing worst by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    Than a modern app with a mouse and a keyboard will be a modern app with a game controller.

  27. My favorite Windows 8 app by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    My favorite Windows 8 app is either a previous copy of Windows 7 or any number of different Linux Distros. One of those is the first thing I always install on a new Windows 8 device. I'm pretty sure the Xbox One won't be running my favorite Windows 8 app any time soon, at least without voiding some warranty or other agreement with Microsoft.

  28. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, it's a lt better as well.

    W/P8 is shallow and dull to use.

  29. And joke complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Ate One Computer
    Windows Ate One Xbone

  30. Re:finally by Kingkaid · · Score: 1

    Actually it is there because manufacturers can modify it as they see fit in order to differentiate their products. If you look at the actual costs of the OS, because of various licensing issues generally Windows Phone is cheaper to put on a device (chalk it up to Microsoft owning most of the licensable patents on android and charging heavily for them).

  31. Re:finally by nschubach · · Score: 1

    Yes. Yes you are.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  32. Re:finally by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally, Microsoft Word for your phone. They will blow Android out of the water.

    They're already half way there. They just have to figure out the "Android out of the water" part.

  33. Netflix? by xgerrit · · Score: 1

    Why do I have a feeling I'm still going to have to "Go Gold" to use the Netflix or Hulu apps...

  34. ah... by LodCrappo · · Score: 1

    So Metro apps are really for game consoles, now I get why they make so little sense on a computer.

    --
    -Lod
  35. NEW UI apps, not Win8.1 apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is so very very stupid, it has a CLASS of programs without a name the public either recognises or understands. This CLASS of applications stand-alone and run fully abstracted from the hardware, like non-native Android and iOS apps.

    You once almost knew them as RT apps, then (or maybe before) as METRO apps. Now they are nameless, but are called by tech sites that take large pay-offs from MS, NEW UI apps. Possibly the stupidest naming, branding in history.

    Of course the Xbox One is designed (very, very badly) to run NEW UI apps. Who at Slashdot (with any technical knowledge of MS and Windows) though otherwise. MS long ago announced the STORE for the Xbox One, and the store obviously overlaps the store for NEW UI apps for Windows8.

    BUT, Xbone NEW UI apps will only permit 'pure' apps, not those with an native machine-code payload. Microsoft doesn't want the Xbone subverted with direct low-level access.

    The Xbone is a fully fledged PC-like computer, but with no intention to offer the old Windows experience. The Xbone is another METRO/RT/New UI system, that is also capable of simultaneously running the proprietary console operating systems (PLURAL- it has 3 at least operating simultaneously and autonomously).

    The 8-cores and 8GB of RAM is not a marketing gimmick, or the usual "chuck more resources at a mostly single-threaded application" solution seen on the Windows desktop. The Xbone is the futuristic computing experience the Desktop Windows based PC clearly REFUSED to evolve into, thanks to the inertia of the Wintel profits gravy-train.

    What amazes me, as proved by the absolute naivete of people on sites like this, is how badly the average nerd appreciates the significance of his/her hobby/interest/calling. Fundamental shifts in the market, driven by forces that have been building for years, are always a surprise to 99.9% of all nerds.

    1. Re:NEW UI apps, not Win8.1 apps by hazydave · · Score: 1

      So you're suggesting it's just plain old Windows RT, only for x86, no NDK allowed (is there actually an NDK for Windows RT?). Of course, Microsoft's had a completely different CLASS (sic) of programs, without a name the public either recognizes or understands, that run fully abstracted from the hardware, like 85% of Android (most iOS apps are native coded iOS Cocoa Touch, though that no longer a requirement)... some called it .NET, some called it Common Language Runtime... but whatever. Didn't seem to help them here, though it certainly might have.

      Not that an X-Box x86 couldn't run native code, but to really keep in place all of the WinRT restrictions, I think they need the VM. You can't even write a compiler in WinRT!

      --
      -Dave Haynie
  36. duh by smash · · Score: 1

    This wasn't predicted already? X86 hardware, Xbox music, Xbox video, etc in the Windows 8.x OS, microsoft trying to converge tablet and desktop OS - no doubt the Xbox OS is.... drum roll... Windows 8.1 or a slightly modified variant of it.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  37. Re: finally by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

    There is no Whoosh interface. It is called Metro. Duh.

    >:-}

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  38. Re:finally by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

    Exactly. The same reason Windows XP held on for so long. It did the job and continued to do the job. People were used to it and you know people don't like having to learn something new. They just want to get things done.

  39. A clarification... don't hold your breath by hazydave · · Score: 1

    Microsoft doesn't talk about it, but they have a fragmentation problem. They seem to have gone boldly into this new Metro era without really thinking much about what users need. They got this idea that the old Zune interface, revamped once for the Windows Phone 7, was their future direction. So now they push the phone interface onto tablets and desktops and 70" televisions. And yeah, it all looks pretty much the same, though I'm sure if I was idiot enough to use it daily, on multiple screens, I'd notice the holes, where the UI didn't translate from one to another.

    But the big problem is that there's not one Metro, but four, and Microsoft won't talk about that. So you have Windows 8, which can run Metro/RT apps, Metro/Win32 apps, and real Win32 apps. Only the WinRT apps will run on Windows RT. But they don't run on Windows Phone... and so far, no indication of just what actually runs on the X-Box One. That didn't used to be much of an issue, but some kind of partial compatibility? That's maybe worse than none.

    And it's not as if they ever talk about it. Microsoft has spend about a billion dollars on Surface ads, I see these constantly. And not a single one told me that a Surface RT or Surface 2 doesn't run "real" Windows programs. Of course we all know this here if we care to follow Microsoft's antics at all, but the average user? Not so much. And at least according a few developer friends, even the development environment and APIs aren't similar yet. Metro/Win32 apps will never run on Surface or Windows Phone or probably X-Box. So just what actually does? And how are they going to deal with all these different incompatible operating systems... particularly now that Windows Phone is moving to support tablets soon. It will actually be possible to find a 7" Windows 8.1, Windows RT, and Windows Phone tablet, together in a store, each with a different set of compatible applications. And no one really knows if Microsoft plans to carry Windows Phone 8 or Windows RT compatibility forward to Windows WHATEVER 9... particularly the phone. They just dumped compatibility going to 6 to 7 and 7 to 8, so why not again?

    In short, they seem about as unfocused as one could imagine on dealing with this whole "move" to mobile devices. Don't get me wrong, it's entertaining as hell, but given Microsoft's near draconian enslavement to application compatibility in upgrades since the dark dank dire days of MS-DOS, it's like they're all drunk or something today... and it can't really be success they're drunk on these days. Not since Android outsold Windows last year...

    --
    -Dave Haynie