Slashdot Mirror


Silicon Supercapacitor Promises Built-in Energy Storage For Electronic Devices

Science_afficionado writes "A news release from Vanderbilt University begins, 'Solar cells that produce electricity 24/7, not just when the sun is shining. Mobile phones with built-in power cells that recharge in seconds and work for weeks between charges. These are just two of the possibilities raised by a novel supercapacitor design invented by material scientists ... that is described in a paper published in the Oct. 22 issue of the journal Scientific Reports. It is the first supercapacitor that is made out of silicon so it can be built into a silicon chip along with the microelectronic circuitry that it powers. In fact, it should be possible to construct these power cells out of the excess silicon that exists in the current generation of solar cells, sensors, mobile phones and a variety of other electromechanical devices, providing a considerable cost savings. ... Instead of storing energy in chemical reactions the way batteries do, “supercaps” store electricity by assembling ions on the surface of a porous material. As a result, they tend to charge and discharge in minutes, instead of hours, and operate for a few million cycles, instead of a few thousand cycles like batteries.' The full academic paper is available online."

8 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Meh by DCFusor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call me when a supercap has anything like the energy density - by any measure of cubic or weight - as a battery. Till then, they have only niche uses. I've seen various supercap articles that were about tech that was "About to change the world" for how many decades now? OK, sooner or later, they might...I'm still waiting, and I ain't gonna live for as many more decades as I've already been waiting. Till then, I'll drive my Volt.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You didn't leave us your number, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Meh by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used a few of them in hobbyist high-power engineering to power the solonoid on an experiment. Five hundred amps DC at 12V with ease.

      Not a "supercap "you didn't
      They tend to have several ohms ESR. Low ESR supercaps are in the realm of 100m ohms. 500A at 12V requires a total system impedance of 0.024R.

    3. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      500 Wh/kg is higher than any shipping lithium ion battery that I've ever heard of, so I'm going to say that your numbers are complete BS.

      500 Wh/kg is available from lithium batteries, but not from rechargeable ones. Rechargeable ones are less than half of that.

    4. Re: Meh by drainbramage · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pretty high and mighty for a dude that owns a volt.
      Tell me when you have a columb.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    5. Re:Meh by amirulbahr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Capacitors used on your motherboard are mostly there as part of filter circuits and therefore chosen for their unique transient response (i.e. exactly how they behave over time once a voltage is applied). In other words, the discharge rate matters. Can't be too fast, can't be too slow.

      Designing silicon based super caps for long term energy storage with slow discharge does not automatically mean that the same tech will replace regular electrolytic caps. I'm not saying they won't, haven't even read TFA, but the design goals are certainly distinct.

  2. This will be a GREAT way by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    to provide electricity for my flying car, and my holographic storage disks too!

  3. No meh here by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Call me when a supercap has anything like the energy density - by any measure of cubic or weight - as a battery. Till then, they have only niche uses.

    The thing is, there are many applications where space and weight aren't an issue, but lifetime and power sourcing are. For instance, I have lots of room -- going ten X on the space involved isn't a problem for me in any way, but it'd be awesome to have a reliable, high-power capable storage system to replace the batteries I'm using now, which (a) aren't going to last very long and (b) are severely limited by comparison in terms of the maximum current that can be drawn from them.

    The real problem is just an engineering one: we need some standard systems to give us usable energy in standard ranges (12vdc and/or 120/240vac) from ultracap stacks. There's nothing hard about that, it's a market and demand issue, no more. Given the demand, designing the hardware is a doddle.

    And of course it's worth noting that UC size is going down while power is going up. Most likely, at some point they will cross the battery line, and that's the time to buy stock in whatever UC company pulls it off.

    Plus, instead of poisoning the environment with a dead battery, you can will your UCs to your kids. :)

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.