Slashdot Mirror


Google Testing Banner Ads On Select Search Results

cagraham writes "Google promised in 2005 to never "ever" put banner ads on their search results, but that appears to be changing. The company confirmed to SearchEngineLand that it is running a "small experiment" involving large-scale banners on searches for Southwest Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, and Crate&Barrel, among others. The ads are being shown in less than 5% of searches, and only in the US, for now. Interestingly enough, the Google exec who wrote the no banner ads promise was Marissa Mayer, now CEO of Yahoo."

28 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. RIP Google, 2014? by xtal · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the upside, banner ads will be pretty easy to target to make never appear with plugins.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:RIP Google, 2014? by pmontra · · Score: 5, Informative

      It seems there are many Geeks around. Adblock usage was 9.2% overall in US and Europe in 2012. See this PDF link for details. Well, maybe there aren't so many geeks but they install Adblock on the computers of friends.

    2. Re:RIP Google, 2014? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I install it on every single computer I touch. Adblock also reduces virus infection vectors drastically as there are a lot of ad's that are virus or malware vectors.

      I know I can account for over 100 installs of adblock plus on people's computers.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:RIP Google, 2014? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I remember correctly. I started using Google because it didn't have banner ads...because it was clean and gave good results. In that order.

    4. Re:RIP Google, 2014? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Given the amount of effort that Microsoft puts into killing competitors, and the hostility between Apple and Google, I'm surprised that IE and Safari don't come with ad blocking out of the box. Making sure IE users never saw Google ads would would hurt Google's revenues a lot more than anything else Microsoft has done.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:RIP Google, 2014? by melikamp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No one should use AdblockPlus over Adblock Edge or TrueBlockor Adblock Lite or any other fork that removed malicious features introduced in version 2.0. If you haven't heard, Palant sold out to advertizers (the ironing is delicious), and has now "allow acceptable ads" option enabled by default, where "acceptable" likely means that Palant got paid. Since that's his game now, I would only use AdblockPlus if I wanted to be get another update with a malicious payload.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adblock_plus#Advert_filtering_and_.22acceptable.22_ads

    6. Re:RIP Google, 2014? by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just uncheck the "allow some non-intrusive advertising" checkbox. If you know how to get adblock, you know how to uncheck the damn box that shows at the first page of the options menu.

  2. when you become a monopoly you can relax by presidenteloco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and start being evil, or at least really really annoying.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:when you become a monopoly you can relax by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

      So putting up an advertisement on a free service is 'evil' now? Google makes their money by advertising. They provide a free service for you and pay for it by selling advertising space to others.

    2. Re:when you become a monopoly you can relax by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Informative

      its NOT a free service; they make money off of selling YOU.

      what part of that don't you understand??

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  3. Re:That doesn't make any sense by frinkster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The linked article has a follow-on FAQ that you can click over to. That answers the question.

    It's protection money. If Southwest Airlines buys the ad, Google won't put other advertising up. If they don't, any other advertiser is welcome to pay Google money to put up a text ad above the search result.

  4. Re:That doesn't make any sense by alostpacket · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To be sure you dont visit Expidia or Orbitz or some such. At least that's what I assume the reasoning is.

    Still that banner is hugely obnoxious looking (IMHO). This is a bad move by Google.

    --
    PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
  5. Disappointing by slasho81 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought Google had at least 10 more good years before the corporate culture take over completely.

    1. Re:Disappointing by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's been a lousy search engine for the last few years ('why give them the five results they asked for when we can give them five million results they didn't?'), so this is only just step down into the steaming pit of suck.

  6. In other words: by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Dear Human Products,

    Google will be placing large, targeted ads across your search results.
    Thank you for your personal information.

    Do Know Evil,
    Google

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  7. OK with me by nbauman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather have banner ads than have 3 or 4 ads at the top that are almost indistinguishable from the search results.

    1. Re:OK with me by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd rather have banner ads than have 3 or 4 ads at the top that are almost indistinguishable from the search results.

      That's a good point.

      We know they have to advertise - that's how we get this awesome free search service. At least an ad that is plainly an ad is pretty easy to ignore.

  8. youtube ads by ljw1004 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On the subject of aggressive advertising...

    It feels like YouTube ads have become much more common and obnoxious in the past few years. Has anyone else noticed this? I used to be content to click on a YouTube link but now each time I do a cost-benefit calculation -- is it really worth sitting through 30secs of irritating car ads or whatever just to see this little funny clip of two kittens and a tortoise? (or other material :) ).

    Usually for me, the answer is now "no".

    1. Re:youtube ads by T-Bucket · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I haven't seen a youtube ad, EVER. Why are you not using adblock?!

    2. Re:youtube ads by addie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The reason is that a number of YouTubers are starting to actually make a career out of making videos. I consume the majority of my shows on YouTube now, rather than TV or traditional media. Many channels have multiple updates per week.

      Am I willing to sit through 30 seconds of advertising (or more likely 5 seconds before being allowed to skip) in order to get such content, and promote independent videographers? Yes. I am.

      Shows worth watching:
      - Veritasium, 2
      - SciShow
      - VSauce, 2, 3
      - Nerd3
      - MinutePhysics
      - Numberphile, Computerphile, Sixty Symbols, etc

  9. Some other things make me wonder... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was just in a google hangout using it as a video conference. During that conference call a particular service was mentioned. I had never heard of the service before, haven't searched for it, and yet mysteriously I'm seeing ads for it pop up all over the place undoubtedly served up by Google.

    Makes me wonder....

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  10. Non-Saavy Users by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For many people, they simply don't understand the difference between putting a website address in the address bar and in Google's search. This leads to competitors buying ad space on the search results, hoping you'll also check out their brand.

    This is a major problem with non-technical users trying to find the phone number for technical support and finding shady service companies pushing yearlong contracts. Try any AV brand + support or phone, and you'll see many other companies offering "Support for X" and making a killing.

  11. Re:Not really evil by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google's business has always been ads. I really don't see how sponsored links embedded in results are any more evil than text ads, especially when they're just running them on search results

    Google's business has always been ads. I really don't see how animated banner ads are any more evil than static banner ads, especially when they're just running them on search results

    Google's business has always been ads. I really don't see how flash ads are any more evil than animated banner ads, especially when they're just running them on search results

  12. Re:Go ahead. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is what happens at any company when the people that started it are no longer in charge. All companies will degenerate into a moneygrubbing greed machine only interested in the next quarter profits without the person that gave it birth at the wheel.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  13. Re:Ad limiting by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Please add a feature to let me change the background of all AD's on google so they are obvious to older people. I have some older clients that if I could get a plugin to make the google search ad background BRIGHT RED it will help them see they are not actual search results.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  14. Well that is it really. Ads ain't evil by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ads ain't evil, they just really annoy me. And Google should know this. What is top plugin for their own browser? What is the main reason people root android? Right, ad blockers. They should know people HATE ads. Hate them with a passion that causes them to foam at the mouth at the slightest exposure.

    And frankly the ad-blockers I have installed work well enough. So far the battle between advertisers and humanity is going fully in favor of humanity.

    Until recently google seemed to accept that a portion of their users had the skills and desire to block all ads and let them get away with in exchange for market share. They were not going to be able to push ads on these people but at least they used their services, enabling them to grow as a company and then sell ads to those that don't mind them. (Just as slashdot allows contributors to hide ads).

    That changed, ad blockers are banned from the android store. So I use firefox mobile and install a plugin for that browser and don't run programs that use ads. And waiting for a moment to root my new phone.

    They are not going to push ads on me but I am perfectly happy to instruct everyone around me how to block them. Fight me google and you will find millions of nerds telling all their friends how to block them. You want to fight us? We made you what you are, we can kill you just as easily as we killed altavista. Reduce you as Yahoo has been reduced. Do you want to join the ranks of AOL?

    Then keep your ads to those that don't mind them.

    You would think that a company that offers their own phone to offer customers a clean phone without vendor or phone company malware would understand this. It seems sales has overtaken google as well.

    Look at what happened to other companies were the sales guy was not killed when he utters the words "I got an idea". Your making billions google, be happy with it. Because there is no way in hell I am going to watch your ads. Ever. I and countless other rage filled nerds will see you dead and buried first. We did it before and unlike MS, we can do it again.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Well that is it really. Ads ain't evil by StripedCow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Talking about nerds, I'm still wondering what kind of nerd actually wants to work for Google.

      There is little glory in writing advertisement software, and data-mining people's behavior.
      I guess they have a company culture that makes them believe otherwise.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  15. Re:Go ahead. by ThatAblaze · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Take a closer look at craigslist. They killed the greed machine in classified ads, and consistently keep it dead.

    It is possible to be a company and not be greedy, just not for Google any longer.