Slashdot Mirror


Infosys Fined $35M For Illegally Bringing Programmers Into US On Visitor Visas

McGruber writes "The U.S. government fined Infosys $35 million after an investigation by the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department found that the Indian company used inexpensive, easy-to-obtain B-1 visas meant to cover short business visits — instead of harder-to-get H-1B work visas — to bring an unknown number of its employees for long-term stays. The alleged practice enabled Infosys to undercut competitors in bids for programming, accounting and other work performed for clients, according to people close to the investigation. Infosys clients have included Goldman Sachs Group, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Cisco Systems Inc. Infosys said in an email that it is talking with the U.S. Attorney's office, 'regarding a civil resolution of the government's investigation into the company's compliance' with employment-record 'I-9 form' requirements and past use of the B-1 visa. A company spokesman, who confirmed a resolution will be announced Wednesday, said Infosys had set aside $35 million to settle the case and cover legal costs. He said the sum was 'a good indication' of the amount involved."

201 comments

  1. Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sure Infosys made more than $35mln by bringing those programmers in the way they did. Aside from not having to pay for the H1B visas, they could pay the programmers much less this way. Of course nothing will change. They'll start doing the same thing again. These settlements show when you have enough money, anything is legal.

    1. Re:Big deal by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      35M is enough that someone internal is going to pay the price -- and by price, I mean leave his executive position and go to work for another tech company in high management for a similar paycheck where he'll repeat the process.

    2. Re:Big deal by casings · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whats worse is they even probably had a strategic team analyze how much they would get fined if they were caught, and decided it was worth the risk.

      As long the US government gets their cut, the people who get screwed are the people who play by the rules. Fuck everything about big business and their collusion with the government.

    3. Re:Big deal by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a pretty easy cure for all of this...

      Just re-write the H1-B laws so that all H1-B workers must be paid 20% more than industry standard for the region or area the job is located in. That, or have a 20-40% premium on each worker's salary paid by the hiring company as an excise tax.

      I bet that shit would stop cold right away.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, maybe they'll outsource the job to India. Then to continue his career a move to India will be necessary.

      Then again, the company in India might outsource the job to the US and hire him back.

    5. Re:Big deal by CyprusBlue113 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is a pretty easy cure for all of this...

      Just re-write the H1-B laws so that all H1-B workers must be paid 20% more than industry standard for the region or area the job is located in. That, or have a 20-40% premium on each worker's salary paid by the hiring company as an excise tax.

      I bet that shit would stop cold right away.

      It isn't enough. A lot of the draw of H1B is the lack of mobility. Let them freely change jobs and allow them to have a 1 year grace period between jobs if they've been in their first job for a year.

      --
      a handful of selfish greedy people are no match for millions of selfish, greedy people -u4ya
    6. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, just stop with the "tax everything that upsets the status quo" mentality.

    7. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Imagine if they faced the kinds of fines leveled at file sharers/pirates.

    8. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      35M is enough that someone internal is going to pay the price -- and by price, I mean leave his executive position and go to work for another tech company in high management for a similar paycheck where he'll repeat the process.

      35M is the cost of just 1 medium project - not even a slap on the wrist. This should have had 2 more zeroes added to it.

    9. Re: Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to get? I thought the govenment was handing thouse things out like candy on Halloween! This is why the quality of code and pay for devs will have that spiralling flushing sound... Look at the names here, 35 million is a tiny sum... Shoud be, people going to jail, for knowingly breaking the law! But this a country governed by corporations!

    10. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the cost of the disaster comes out of a different budget. You save the company $10M, you get a huge bonus and a pat on the back, and then the company finds out you cheated, they pay $35M in fines but you've still got your bonus, your sector of the company still performed well, where's the problem?

      Modern shareholders are asleep, they see "We saved $10M" and "We had to pay $35M fine" and they don't make out the total "We lost $25M of your money with our recklessness" and they don't start firing board members. So it will happen again. If the board at Infosys believed that every time this happens some of them will have to empty their pockets and leave the building they would perk up more when it comes to oversight, which is supposed to be their job. As it is, they get paid rain or shine, why should they care who breaks the law?

    11. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats worse is they even probably had a strategic team analyze how much they would get fined if they were caught, and decided it was worth the risk.

      Sounds like you're describing a conspiracy to defraud the government, conspiracy to commit multiple felonies including misuse of Passport, fraud and misuse of visa, and fraud and related activities in connection with identification documents and information. I'd hate to be in their shoes after the US government seizes all their US property under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

      As long the US government gets their cut, the people who get screwed are the people who play by the rules. Fuck everything about big business and their collusion with the government.

      Oh, right... nevermind.

    12. Re:Big deal by dk20 · · Score: 1

      How many lobbyists would oppose this proposal?

    13. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $35,000k divided by $50k per developer per year makes 700 developers.
      If you hire 700 devs in a year pay them $50k less than you would have to do otherwise. Great business model.

    14. Re:Big deal by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      20% isn't steep enough. If employers really can't find qualified people in this country, then they won't mind paying double or triple the market rate to get people with the necessary skills.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    15. Re:Big deal by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      You can bet that whomever decided to do this either:
      a. Had a legal team calculate the cost in fines and deduced they'd make more money than the fines would cost them by doing this.
      or
      b. (most likely) didn't check, didn't care, implemented the strategy and raked in large bonuses until the feds started asking questions at which time he/she either retired or moved on to another job. Ironically they likely will point to Infosys for the rest of their career and say "See how great they were doing right up until I left?"

    16. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      35M is enough that someone internal is going to pay the price -- and by price, I mean leave his executive position and go to work for another tech company in high management for a similar paycheck where he'll repeat the process.

      35M is the cost of just 1 medium project - not even a slap on the wrist. All of the executives who were responsible for this should be hanged for treason.

      FTFY.

    17. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      says the guy who most assuredly works for big business..

    18. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're actually threatened by offshoring you're probably not all that good at your job anyway

    19. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm. They already can freely change jobs (not to a job at Starbuck's, but into a programming job). It's called H1-B portability and it's been around since about year 2000. Employer fills out a form, drops it in the mail and you're good to go.

      Two of my hires this month are moving from junk companies to a decent company exactly this way.

    20. Re:Big deal by Mateorabi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Give H1B holders who blow the whistle on their employers violating the law (overworking them, or claiming and paying them as if it were a much lower skilled job that in reality is higher skilled, the employer just wanted to scare off US workers, etc.) either fast-path to a Green Card, double the pay (paid by fines) they would have earned, and/or freedom to move to a different employer for their stay.

      I.e. change the incentives for H1B visa holders to rat out misbehaving employers, rather than being scared to say anything because they loose if they do.

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

    21. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The secret visa is L1. Even in CIR there is no talk on L1. The outsourcing companies rely heavily on L1, not H1Bs. L1 has no annual caps and there is no minimum wage requirement. Just the application fee is higher for L1. For fees - B1 L1 H1. L1 to GC requires no Labor verification.

    22. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you spell it out for us? Making H1-B's more expensive somehow stops "all this" and "that shit"?
      As is clear from the article, this shit was a company avoiding H1-B's because of the cost and hassle. But if H1-B's
      were even more expensive ... I give up. Infosys would have behaved better, why exactly?

       

    23. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude research L1. H1's CTC is already 50% higher.

    24. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they should have done was something dramatic like see how much profit the company made last year and then fine them that much. That would be a good bitch slap, and example to the rest of the tech industry.

    25. Re:Big deal by CyprusBlue113 · · Score: 1

      Give H1B holders who blow the whistle on their employers violating the law (overworking them, or claiming and paying them as if it were a much lower skilled job that in reality is higher skilled, the employer just wanted to scare off US workers, etc.) either fast-path to a Green Card, double the pay (paid by fines) they would have earned, and/or freedom to move to a different employer for their stay.

      I.e. change the incentives for H1B visa holders to rat out misbehaving employers, rather than being scared to say anything because they loose if they do.

      That's like saying cops as a whole won't abuse power if we listen to the rare whistle blowers every now and then. When the system itself is abusable by design, 4 or 5 honest actors aren't going to fix that, you have to fix the system.

      --
      a handful of selfish greedy people are no match for millions of selfish, greedy people -u4ya
    26. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 20% - 40% premium would probably be enough although also allowing free movement between companies for the duration of the visa would be even better. At a high enough salary, a worker is unlikely to hop jobs anyway. Since the real problem with the H-1B program is that it is used to lower wages while officially purporting to be a means of allowing the best and the brightest foreigners to work in the US, why not force a wage premium? The best and brightest foreigner should be more capable than the average American and is thus deserving of a higher wage per free market principles.

    27. Re: Big deal by NickGnome · · Score: 1
      "allow them to have a 1 year grace period between jobs"
      ...

      H-1Bs are supposed to be TEMPORARY guest-work visas, not long-term visas. They should have to apply for renewal every 3-10 months. Of course, renewals and extensions should go a lot more quickly than the initial/new visa application, because they will only require a month or so for the incremental background investigation rather than 3-6 months for the initial investigation (of course, if they have a student visa and apply to change to H-1B, that change of status should only require an incremental, too, but then the more extensive investigation should be done before they can get the student or exchange visa). 1-5 weeks between gigs is generous.

      H-1B visas are also supposedly for the "best and brightest" with arcane niche skills not available anywhere among US citizens and green card holders, if you believe the executives, immigration lawyers and their lobbyists, so the pay should be significantly above the mean and median. (And no, filling out a bodyshoppers-R-us time sheet or project planning form 8-C is not a highly valuable niche skill meriting a visa of any kind.)

    28. Re: Big deal by NickGnome · · Score: 2
      "20% isn't steep enough. If employers really can't find qualified people in this country"
      ...

      Yah, sure. Racists consider people of whatever race they dislike to be "unqualified". Age discriminators consider people who are older or younger than they prefer to be "unqualified". Those with unethical schemes consider people whose professional ethics preclude them from collaborating in schemes to, e.g. violate people's rights, initiate force or fraud, identity theft, extortion, privacy violation..., to be "unqualified" and "unwilling".

      Many of these employers consider even highly able (gifted/genius, creative, knowledgeable, industrious, experienced) and willing/enthusiastic US citizen STEM professionals to be "unqualified", and they just can't find anyone other than guest-workers who are "qualified" (and want us all to pay no attention to the new artificial barriers they've erected to employing or actively recruiting US citizens since the advent of the H-1B visa program).

      But they are willing to spend $billions on lobbyists, to try to convince the low-information public, and the easily bri, er, uh, cultivated and discerning media, congress-critters and other politicians.

    29. Re:Big deal by pkphilip · · Score: 2

      What you are proposing will actually make the situation worse. H1B visas are relatively hard to get compared to the B1 visa that Infosys was abusing.

      A B1 visa is easier to obtain as it is intended for short visits for things like negotiating a business contract, a marketing/sales visit and so on. It does NOT allow for the person to receive a salary from the US entity or to engage in any production work such as software development.

      However, since H1B is difficult to get and since many contracts can be executed without having developers in the US for 3 years (that is the case with H1B), many companies abuse the B1 visa.

    30. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why there are soo many bs IT titles these days. Just crank out a new one and pay them 35 k.

    31. Re:Big deal by Zemran · · Score: 1

      "Infosys had set aside $35 million to settle the case and cover legal costs. "

      Meaning that they expect to discount the $35m by at least the cost of the legal expenses. So the people have to carry that burden... Surely it is time that such negotiations go 2 ways. i.e. "You want to argue the penalty, OK $45m..."

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    32. Re:Big deal by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Not really? He probably brought in a couple of hundred million. This would just be considered the costs of business. Hell, this is just like Microsoft.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    33. Re:Big deal by ulatekh · · Score: 1

      Give H1B holders who blow the whistle on their employers violating the law...

      Getting foreigners to trust the United States that much isn't always possible.

      --
      "Once we've identified and embraced our sickness, we'll have strength...and that's when we get dangerous." - John Waters
    34. Re:Big deal by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      nope. Just deny them their business licence and all of the foreigners that were associated with that company will be denied any business dealings in America.

      BTW, if they did this to America, I would bet that they have pulled similar actions on other nations.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    35. Re:Big deal by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      why? These were foreign executives. These were not Americans. There was no treason here. They, and any businesses that they are connected with in ANY FASHION, should simply be denied business licences in America.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    36. Re:Big deal by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yup. I have been saying that all along. Heck, they can bring in all of the temp immigrants that they want, so long as they pay double on taxes, AND are required to be paid 10% or more above the prevailing wages.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    37. Re:Big deal by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Labour laws, that's next to rampant unionism, that fixed minimum wages for all job types, that, OH MY GOD, communism ;D. Face it your screwed. Psychopathic corporations having be adding in the slap on the wrist fines as a normal cost oh high profit transactions for decades. Basically straight up organised crimes, where the criminals, those corporate executives know that they will not only get away with it without even a slap on the wrist but they keep their bonuses too boot and who get fined, why the shareholders. Corporate executives are really out of control, until they personally start getting targeted with prison sentences for their criminal conspiracies in committing acts organised crime nothing will change.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    38. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No just lift the cap, not every H1B is a Saraswati. Think of the employment from fixing stuff programmed exactly to specs.

    39. Re:Big deal by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Why not just give them an automatic green card, and get whistle blowers coming out of the woodwork?

    40. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if they're not Americans then they don't deserve a trial. In that case, a drone should be dispatched to off each one of them and their families.

      By denying America the full economic benefit of having the work performed by Americans they are depriving our nation of monetary resources which could be used to further the fight against terrorism. In essence, they are providing support to the terrorists. It is reasonable to kill these sort of supporters of terrorism without trial.

    41. Re:Big deal by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Well, if they're not Americans then they don't deserve a trial. In that case, a drone should be dispatched to off each one of them and their families.

      I hear Gitmo has some spare rooms.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    42. Re:Big deal by houghi · · Score: 1

      I have another solution: let the market work it out. It is not as if they are forbidding Americans take those jobs.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    43. Re:Big deal by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

      Sure, as soon as you accept any product imported from US will have an automatic 20% extra "US tax" in other countries. You want to sell your products in other countries, but you want to outlaw other countries selling their products or services! That is not hypocritical, at all!

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    44. Re:Big deal by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      35M is enough that someone internal is going to pay the price -- and by price, I mean leave his executive position and go to work for another tech company in high management for a similar paycheck where he'll repeat the process.

      That depends on whether Infosys made a significant profit by this maneuver even taking the 35M into account.

      If they made 500M (bullshit number just for example) in profits this way overall and had to pay 35M in penalties they'd say 'well done we came out ahead'.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    45. Re: Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it's also deductible ...that's the really crappy part.

    46. Re:Big deal by isorox · · Score: 1

      why? These were foreign executives. These were not Americans. There was no treason here. They, and any businesses that they are connected with in ANY FASHION, should simply be denied business licences in America.

      But what would happen to all the honest hard-working Americans working for them?

      Oh right..

    47. Re:Big deal by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Letting the market work it out is only fair when all participants are on a level playing field. When the cost of living in some other country is much lower than ours, people from there are likely to be willing to work for wages that we would consider to be poverty scale. Exporting (or importing workers) those jobs may help the companies, but is screwing over the public, and forcing lower wages. Eventually, you'll end up with a public that is unable to afford the products that companies are sell, or the education required to fill open positions.

      I'm generally pro-business, but I see this as short sighted, and harmful to the nation.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    48. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or just give them all greencards. void all contracts signed in india as unenforceable in the US and make employment agreements that dont let you quit only be allowed for say a year. after that they are illegal.

      you will see the real value of h1bs if they are allowed to come here and quit on there employers like the rest of us can. why would they stay if they can get more money somewhere else?

    49. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is to not have ANY H1-B visas. They already off shore everything they can and there are a lot of Americans, including technical workers, who need jobs. The jobs they can't off shore are ours. Give them to us.

    50. Re:Big deal by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Love the sarcasm.
      But why would you convict a foreigner of treason? Treason is for citizens, not foreigners. And the best thing to do is to deny those ppl or any businesses associated with them, the ability to work in/with America.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    51. Re:Big deal by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      It is not as if they are forbidding Americans take those jobs.

      Given the lower salaries paid to the H1-B's and that fact that Infosys, an *Indian* company, is procuring those visas to then turn around and low-ball bids on IT positions in the US?

      They may as well be forbidding Americans from taking those jobs.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    52. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a pretty easy cure for all of this...

      Just re-write the H1-B laws so that all H1-B workers must be paid 20% more than industry standard for the region or area the job is located in. That, or have a 20-40% premium on each worker's salary paid by the hiring company as an excise tax.

      I bet that shit would stop cold right away.

      This is globalization shit. If US products and companies enter Indian market then vice versa is obvious.
      Similar taxation approach will be followed by Indian Govt.. apply more bans/taxes to US companies/products/services. Definitely US has done lot of illegal stuff in other countries !!
      Realistically, US was enjoying the benefits of globalisation so far.. but was not aware of the shit it was creating. Current issue definitely roots to globalization outcome !!

    53. Re:Big deal by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if you have a sponsored green card application in progress (which a lot of H1Bs do - it's pretty much the only readily accessible skilled immigration path to US), and you switch employers, then you need to reapply, and are pushed back to the beginning of the queue. Given that the queue for green card applications is over 5 years now, and gets bigger with every year, this is a very major drawback. As an H1B myself, I know that I would personally be very hesitant to change jobs for this reason alone.

    54. Re:Big deal by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Importing workers only skews the playing field if those workers leave back to their country of origin after their contract ends. If they choose to remain in the country, then they have the same living expenses, taxes etc as any other resident.

      The problem with US immigration system is that it doesn't really have a properly designed track to citizenship through employment for a skilled immigrant. There's the "superstar" O visa, but the bar that it sets is so extremely high that even a very skilled professional generally doesn't qualify. So, in practice, people come in on the "non-immigrant" H1B, and then apply for a green card, but that process is extremely drawn out (5+ year queue to begin with), and if you change jobs you start from scratch. Compare to Canada, where you can come into the country on a work visa, and then after a year apply for permanent residence through the provincial nominee program - and get it within 1-2 years. This means that far more people who come to work, stay and settle there.

    55. Re:Big deal by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      This isn't about immigration, it's about temporary workers, who are supposed to leave when their work is done. Otherwise we'd be discussing different visas. I'll be happy to discuss it, as I've been through it all with my ex-wife.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    56. Re:Big deal by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You can't discuss H1B and say that it "isn't about immigration". I don't know how many H1Bs are, effectively, immigrants, but it's a significant proportion. Every single one I know - myself included - is in the process of applying for a green card; and quite a few citizens and green card holders that I know are also ex-H1Bs.

      You can say that H1B is for "temp workers who are supposed to leave", but what exactly is then there for those who want to work and stay?

      Anyway, my point is that the problem you're talking about is only a problem if your imported workforce is temporary. Therefore, the obvious solution is to discourage that, and encourage it being a track to permanent immigration.

  2. When by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When is the punishment going to be "No, you're out of business, you fraud. You don't play fair. You cost us jobs. You're GONE."

    These bastards *made* more than 35 million off the scam. They're turning a profit off it.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When is the punishment going to be "No, you're out of business, you fraud. You don't play fair. You cost us jobs. You're GONE."

      As much as I would also delight in seeing some real justice, this solution (as well as any other I've heard) fails to account for the punishment's impact. We're trying to punish the company, not its likely innocent employees. How do we do that? Take away their U.S. business license? Everyone local loses their jobs, company continues expanding overseas, the only people hurt are American bystanders. What if we jail the executives and let the federal government take over the business? Ignoring the feds' history of being unable to manage anything resembling a business, this is clearly a slippery slope toward communism. And why would a company invest any finances or personnel into a branch of itself that could be confiscated at any moment? We'd be no better than China is now.

      The biggest problem in all this is that the wealthiest corporate overlords, the people really making decisions about $35mil fines being worth it, can always vote with their feet. A few months ago there was a series of stories about wealthy people in California registering their out-of-state homes as their primary ones for tax purposes to avoid Cali's ever growing state taxes. Next time, they'll be switching to their Southeast Asian homes. If doing business in any one country becomes too much of a hassle, they'll shift their focus to a country where the politicians are more grateful for any lobbyists willing to donate a Ferrari to their campaign in exchange for looser regulations.

      Don't get me wrong, I hate the current system and agree that this is yet another example of a corporation getting slapped on the wrist, but they might leave this abusive relationship if we ever actually tried to hit them back. Then we'd be even more screwed.

    2. Re:When by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As much as I would also delight in seeing some real justice, this solution (as well as any other I've heard) fails to account for the punishment's impact. We're trying to punish the company, not its likely innocent employees.

      Every employee at the company was complicit. If they lose their jobs over this sort of thing enough times, they'll learn to quit working for unethical assholes.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:When by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      There would be no jobs. Then everybody loses.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    4. Re:When by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Or ban them for having any visas for a year or so - if you abuse the system you should forfeit your privileges just as a number of "colleges" have been in the UK

    5. Re: When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      EVERY employee? Sorry nightshift janitor guy, but you're guilty as sin even if you had no idea what was going on.

    6. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually think no jobs would be a bad thing? Do you think if suddenly no one had a job the entire population of the nation would commit mass suicide? I promise you we would be better off.

    7. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because every business that Bush/Obama bailed out would have to go down under. Take for instance Bank of America. They promised that the bailout money would create new jobs but they never claimed anything about it being in the US. So when they got their money, practically without contract, they fired everyone in the US and setup work in the Philippines. Well, I live in the Philippines now so it's kinda supportive but at the same time not because they people people $1.4/hr or so and tell the government not to do a thing. Well, now president Aquino is not liking this because he went into office with almost a libertarian mindset and he's trying to rid corruption all around whether it's internally or externally as long as it applies to the Philippines. I'm not saying he's perfect but he's much better (supposedly) than the other crooks that came into office before him. So BOA might have to look elsewhere in the end. But that won't phase BOA too much, they just need to talk to convergeys or something to bring customer support to India or something. Meanwhile, those jobs belong in the US because they were paid by tax dollars. But who can you blame when they did all they needed to do in their legal right? The government is the one that said they would do it (no public opinion) and they did it without strict contracts.

      I'm just worried what will happen next because there are bills on the table that are for the government to get heavily involved in the public sector. I don't just mean regulating, I also mean they could easily buy out corporations if they wish. What does that have to do with the article? The government and corporations are and have been sleeping in the same bed since at least the 70s and they've been seeing each other since the federal dollar was introduced. It'll be a long time before we see corporations being punished accordingly.

    8. Re:When by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Fraud as in a felony!? To hell with the fine, people need to be behind bars for this shit!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:When by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      First, the "But there are innocent people that depend on them for their livelihood" excuse is ridiculous. If we are going to use that logic, we should just get rid of all laws. They guy that breaks into your home, rapes your wife, and kills your dog on the way out may have an innocent child at home that depends on his livelihood. Letting corporations (and those that run them) get away with abusing millions of people just because they are rich is why they do it.

      After that, letting the rich steal from the middle class and poor because they "might leave the country" is just as silly. These people and corporations are not a net benefit to the US. They are already siphoning money away from the US and sending it overseas. These people and corporations are a cancer to our economy. Sure it might hurt to lose a leg of our economy, but if you don't bite the bullet and eradicate the cancer early, it spreads and grows. You end up losing both legs and half your torso.

    10. Re: When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? The problem with your argument is that Infosys actually brought people into America. As such they violated American law and displaced American workers illegally. How in the world would them following the law, albeit in favor of multinational orgs, or not following the law, not hurt American workers? Either way American workers get hit. And btw the reason why Infosys brings their workers here is because the offshore model does not work without being physically here...and, yes displacing a
      American jobs.

      Btw if they had not "settled" they would have been convicted and lost all visa privileges for ever...essentially a out of business verdict. Oh, maybe not, set up newco and it's round two.

    11. Re: When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, "too big to fail", right? Because a janitor might unfairly lose his job, laws shouldn't apply to corporations?

    12. Re:When by msobkow · · Score: 1

      If there is legitimite work that needs to be done in the US, it will still need to be done.

      By another company, which can easily hire the people who were laid off when InfoSys or other such abusers were kicked out of the country.

      Any job "losses" would be temporary at most.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    13. Re:When by thej1nx · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How about being reasonable, and having it as "You broke laws and made profit illegally, so we take away ALL of that illegal portion of your profits that was made illegally and charge a 5-10% penalty on top of that, so that it is no longer profitable for you to break our laws" ?

      Corporations care just for the profits. If it is profitable for them to break laws, despite the current penalties involved, they will do so. Make it unprofitable and they are as law-abiding as the next guy.

      You know, it might be kinda better than all that xenophobic bullshit about FOREIGNERS making profittttsss off you.... and trying to shut them down and costing even the legitimately employed folks of the company, their jobs. But I guess, racism and xenophobia is more popular...

    14. Re:When by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      yeah right - convert them all into bartenders.

      that'll sure help things.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    15. Re:When by sjames · · Score: 1

      They won't vote with their feet if it means they can never return. Especially if they can't take their ill gotten loot with them when they leave. If you let fear that they might leave trump the rule of law, then they become the new nobility and the we might as well just crown the richest one and call him 'your majesty'.

      If they're gone, someone will need to fill the void here. That provides an opportunity. We need more opportunity here.

    16. Re:When by houghi · · Score: 1

      A fine is intended like a slap on the hand. You notice it, but you will not die from it.
      If they do it again, I am sure they will pay a LOT more.

      Also next to a fine there may be other payments they must do. How it works in Belgium is that you A) need to pay back the money you made of of it and B) pay a fine.

      If the 30MM is all they had to pay, then it is not a fine but a settlement.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re:When by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure there would. The void left by their departure would be filled. In the meanwhile, liquidate the crooks and give itr to the innocent local employeed to hold them over while the void is filled.

    18. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, it is not just Infosys which does this. I used to work at the India centre of one of the big fat Silicon Valley tech giants, and they used to send people to US all the time on B1 visas for working with clients. It was common knowledge that it is not legal, but still they did it. Doesn't mean that I am justifying it, just saying that it is not just the foreigners which is "looting the US of its rightful revenue" :-)

    19. Re:When by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Those responsible for breaking the law should be the ones dealing with the consequences. A corporation may be legally culpable but I don't accept that it's the sensible target for this sort of crime, except as a last resort.

      He's not arguing that we should let it go because it affects the innocent. The argument is that we should try to target the guilty more precisely.

      For that matter, I haven't seen any credible evidence Infosys benefitted anywhere near than $35 million dollars *for this particular thing the court case is about*.

    20. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      letting the rich steal from the middle class and poor because they "might leave the country" is just as silly. These people and corporations are not a net benefit to the US.

      Exactly. Like when a store manager bends to the unreasonable demands of a customer. The managers logic is 'don't lose a customer', but in this case, the customer is actually a Loss to the store, not a Profit. Losing a loss is better than keeping one.

    21. Re:When by BVis · · Score: 1

      The void left by their departure would be filled

      ... by a company acting just as badly or worse. It's the 'car salesman' business model. Everyone hates car salesmen (with good reason) but so long as every salesman in every dealership acts just as cravenly, then there's no incentive to change the model.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    22. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol this was funny

    23. Re:When by sjames · · Score: 1

      Car salesmen are that way because we never ever prosecute them. If enough of them get fined out of business, they will stop.

    24. Re:When by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The corporation absolutely IS responsible. If the business was a sole proprietorship, you wouldn't see this as much. It is the status as a corporation that enables and encourages this behavior. The very point of a corporation is to protect individual human from responsibility.

      The only argument against revoking corporate status is that someone innocent will be hurt financially. This argument is just as valid for a human as it is for a corporation. So, we should either abolish any punishments that would prevent individuals from earning money, or we should hold corporations accountable at the same level.

  3. Next series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    F1 visas?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tri-Valley_University

  4. Look at the bright side by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    My guess is that more American companies will be looking into this as a solid business model, and that the fines will just be a cost of doing business.

    Anything to get rid of those pesky American workers.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Look at the bright side by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But why bother?

      H1B is not all that hard to get.
      You just lay off your current workers, then lie about there being no available US workers that meet the (carefully crafted) criteria.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I don't buy American.

      Nothing in my society supports me, why should I support it?

    3. Re: Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got that right! Until the products begin to suck and the exectutives bail with the cash and ask the tax-payer for a bailout!

    4. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wont you please think of the US three letter employee's (CEO, CFO, CIO...) bonus?

      By outsourcing your job they saved money. They then did NOT pass the saving on by lowering the price to the consumer but instead fed it into their bonus pool.

      H1B, providing value every day.

    5. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      One word: Quota

      There's a finite number of H1B's that are available every year, with a lottery-type system to see who gets them.

    6. Re:Look at the bright side by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Except they don't. Where is this mysterious foreign worker that works for less money under the H-1B program? I've never met one, and I think I know why: The terms of obtaining them require that they are paid the same as anybody else working in that particular job.

      Slashdot likes to have it both ways on this one: They claim that Americans are stupid, as marked by poor test scores below most of the developed world. Yet at the same time they insist that there's no need for H-1B visas because we have plenty of well educated workers.

      Those two statements are mutually exclusive of one another, you're going to have to decide which one you think is more accurate. I personally note this: If the foreign workers weren't talented, nobody would hire them. I think it is probably a good thing that they come here, pay our taxes, contribute to our GDP, and add to our "brain pool". Alternatively, US companies can't find any talent at all, so a foreign competitor takes over the market on the global economy. No amount of tariffs or duties will stop the later from happening - the US can't tell Germany, England, or Australia who they are and aren't allowed to buy from.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    7. Re:Look at the bright side by russotto · · Score: 1

      Except they don't. Where is this mysterious foreign worker that works for less money under the H-1B program? I've never met one, and I think I know why: The terms of obtaining them require that they are paid the same as anybody else working in that particular job.

      There's a billion ways around those rules. But if you work for a decent company you're unlikely to see too many of these lower-paid visa workers. The companies which hire them (like Infosys) tend to hire them by the planeload, and hire them almost exclusively; programmers-by-the-pound, if you will.

    8. Re:Look at the bright side by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      My guess is they are paid the lowest possible amount of money to stay legal and their wage stays stagnant. Companies know eventually the H1-B will move on or leave the country so they look at it long term. An American worker will eventually want more and more money the longer they stay. An H1-B knows they could be replaced by another so they may not be as aggressive is asking for more money. So they are paid a fair wage on paper but it never increases or increases very little (dollar raises, 50 cent raises etc.). In the long run the company saves money by not giving a fair raise.

      It also happens to any low tier worker in a large company, foreign or not. They are disposable. The only people making money are management and possibly a few senior engineers or project leads. The rest are peons. How many H1-B's are in management? My guess is none or few if any.

    9. Re:Look at the bright side by clay_shooter · · Score: 1

      Except they don't. Where is this mysterious foreign worker that works for less money under the H-1B program? I've never met one, and I think I know why: The terms of obtaining them require that they are paid the same as anybody else working in that particular job.

      You've probably never actually talked with folks brought over under H-1B. We had folks, a couple jobs back, where the customer ended up telling the H1B contracting company that they had to pass through more of what they were charging to the folks doing the work. They got 40% raises still leaving them below market contracting rates. The customer was happy because their contractors were happier and they still saved money, probably 20% over US.

    10. Re:Look at the bright side by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that more American companies have been using this as a solid business model,.

      FTFY

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    11. Re:Look at the bright side by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It all depends on which company you're talking about. Microsoft, Google and Amazon all not only pay their H1Bs the fair wage, but they sponsor them for green cards, which is directly contrary to the notion that they're better off with an H1B than with a citizen. That's because skilled workers are seen not as cheap "use them for 3 years and dump them" resource, but an expensive one with a lot of upfront investment that can only be repaid over years of work, so they're interested in people staying long-term.

      On the other hand, you have companies like Infosys, which are all about cheap, expenable labor. Those are the guys who use every trick in the book to 1) hire an H1B even if the position can be filled otherwise, and 2) pay them as little as they can get away with.

    12. Re:Look at the bright side by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm a person who is on H1B, and I get paid more than most citizens that I know who do the same job.

      It all really depends on the company in question. Some use the program as it was intended, to complement the local hiring pool; others use it to implement wage slavery with a twist.

  5. Is that Treble damages on top of fines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For each and every position which they did not higher industry median wage for they should pay 3 times the difference in wages + benefits (including pay-ins to the government) that were not disbursed. Further they should also have to pay some type of fine per position, per (year/quarter) that the violations occurred.

    In other words, they should for SURE show a net loss for this bad behavior. If the behavior is egregious enough those in authority at the time should also face real jail time.

    Anything less than that is a slap on the wrist and will not curb this behavior among companies who look at the balance sheet and conclude that the fines are a cost of doing business.

    1. Re:Is that Treble damages on top of fines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. But that won't happen. It is precisely actions like this which have caused wages for STEMS workers to be kept low at a time when it is "claimed" that there is a HUGE demand for STEMS workers, and that none can be found in the USA.

      Yet the moment you look at pay (and factor in inflation), there has been only a ~10% rise in pay since 1995 for STEMS positions. According to the economic law of supply and demand, something isn't correct with the statements those companies are saying (and it has a lot to do with keeping pay low).

    2. Re:Is that Treble damages on top of fines? by icebike · · Score: 1

      The nail was hit on the head in the second sentence.

      However, it wouldn't be the CEO who goes to jail but some lowly middle management type.

      The CEO will simply deny any knowledge that this was going, on and everyone down the chain of
      command will insist they never told the CEO what was going on, and anyone who refuses to tow the
      company line will be forced to accept an assignment in Russia. *cough*.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:Is that Treble damages on top of fines? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      The ceo doesn't have to say anything, any probe of him by any agency will be met by a phalanx of lawyers court with orders to leave him alone and instructions to question underlings and minions. The only time ceos and other top dogs have to face the music is in front of senate subcommittees, and that's rare enough.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    4. Re:Is that Treble damages on top of fines? by Cryacin · · Score: 1
      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    5. Re:Is that Treble damages on top of fines? by DeathToThePatriarchy · · Score: 1

      It sounds easy, but try to do the audit that will give you that number. I guarantee they keep very "complex" books and records that can prove just about anything. The fine needs to cover more than what they (and the companies that knowingly hired from them) underpaid the individual workers. it needs to cover the economic damage caused by depressing salaries in those fields, as well. There are major employers in the tech field known to pay "wages only immigrant will take." They need to feel that pain as well.

  6. Missing Step 2 by Notabadguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We're missing step #2, which is "And since you're defrauding the government among other customers, you're blacklisted from doing business with them again."

    $35m isn't a drop in the bucket.

    1. Re:Missing Step 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If fraud is involved, then somebody's ass needs to be in jail! That would get their attention and hopefully it would actually curtail the problem.

    2. Re:Missing Step 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      "35m isn't a drop in the bucket."

      Yes it is.

      Revenue US$ 7.39 billion (2013)
      Operating income US$ 1.90 billion (2013)
      Profit US$ 1.72 billion (2013)

    3. Re:Missing Step 2 by EricTheGreen · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right....except you're assuming there is an actual finding/admission of guilt.

      The article speaks of a "settlement" being announced. To my eyes, the probability of that settlement including an admission of culpability approaches zero.

      Infosys will not be blacklisted, they'll mind their manners and volume for a bit, then quietly pick up where they left off on the contract pile.

      And....allowing for that tiny percentage sliver, what if they do admit guilt and are barred from government contracting for whatever period? They just slide the excess capacity over to the contractual pile of Walmart, Sears, etc.

      As others have mentioned, $35MM, while not a drop in the bucket, is small enough to be absorbed as a carrying cost of doing business, given the revenue stream.

      I hate the whole sordid "enterprise staffing" model that spawns this garbage and hope fervently never to work with it again.

    4. Re:Missing Step 2 by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      I have a better punishment: no visas of any kind for three years. No h1b, no b1, your CEO can't have a visa for his quarterly visit, nothing. The punishment should fit the crime.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    5. Re:Missing Step 2 by dk20 · · Score: 1

      its a white collar crime involving a lot of money, no one goes to jail for this.

    6. Re:Missing Step 2 by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Fine the companies who had the workers.
      While not truly at fault, perhaps the burden should be with the one who pays the bills to ensure compliance with US laws?

      Plus, one never knows what the arrangements were.

    7. Re:Missing Step 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd call 2% of PROFIT a drop in the bucket.

    8. Re:Missing Step 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO it isn't. while I think the fine should be higher, a little over 2% of profit is actually a significant number, significant enough to impact share price marginally.

    9. Re:Missing Step 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, not a marginal impact of the corporation's share price! What a cruel fate!

    10. Re:Missing Step 2 by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      Yes - it *is* a drop in the bucket. Total Profit US - 1.72 billion. Let's presume that a significant portion of their profit is derived from overcharging for illegally underpaid Indian works on B-1 "Business visit" visas.

      Losing $35,000,000 is a drop in the bucket when faced with the windfall of cash that they illegally made.

  7. H1B Scam by oldhack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dump H1B. Instead of giving out Visa for foreign nationals, we should try to KEEP foreign graduates in this country - make it easier for foreign students graduating from US colleges to live and work in the US.

    This is no brainer - many of the best and brightest from all over the world are already here in our universities.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      And it would completely leave anyone who is not a student in the cold. I'm in the US on an H1B, working at a small tech startup. Since I joined the company, we have already doubled in size, hiring plenty more Americans. Are H1Bs sometimes abused? Yes, sure, it happens. On the other hand, I and other people like me are actively helping the US economy by creating new jobs.

    2. Re:H1B Scam by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since I joined the company, we have already doubled in size, hiring plenty more Americans. ... On the other hand, I and other people like me are actively helping the US economy by creating new jobs.

      Do you honestly think there was nobody in the US who could have done your job? And that the growth of the company you work for is mainly because of your work product?

      Arguing that H1Bs really help the US economy requires the answer to both to be "yes". Otherwise, you are simply taking a job that some US resident could have filled and claiming that you're helping him out by having it.

    3. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how that would allow employers to abuse employees without fearing repercussions which is most of the point of the H1B visa program. They can be overworked, underpaid, sexually harrassed, anything the employer feels like doing to them. The employer has complete control because they can close the position and have the person deported in short order if they start complaining. If they were US citizens, the companies would have to act fairly. Who wants that?

    4. Re:H1B Scam by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Nothing personal to you AC, and good that you're doing well here. But a large number of capable foreign students, some of world's best and brightest, come here on their own and graduate from our reputable schools, are already here and familiar with the land, and want to work and live here. When we are failing to accommodate these people, the industry's clamor for more H1B is utter nonsense - it serves the industry's aim to suppress wage rather than attracting talent to America.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    5. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had been looking for someone to fill this position for 6 months. Could someone from the US have filled this position? Sure, I don't have magical skills that no one else possesses. And yes, a big chunk of why we've grown is because the work I do has shown our investors we're on the right track and have in return received a bunch of funding that has allowed us to create new jobs.

      Did I take some poor American's job? Maybe. But boo-hoo-hoo, cry me a river. It was slim pickings to begin with, and in the mean time I am more than happy to use my talents and skills to build a great company.

    6. Re:H1B Scam by artor3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They weren't really looking for someone to fill the position for 6 months. They determined they wanted to hire someone on the cheap, and so they came up with some impossible criteria for the job. When no one was able to meet those impossible criteria, they hired you.

      And yes, a big chunk of why we've grown is because the work I do has shown our investors we're on the right track and have in return received a bunch of funding that has allowed us to create new jobs.

      Since you're not American, you might not be familiar with this reference, but there's a group of statistics in baseball with names like VORP -- value over replacement player. For example, if someone hits ten home runs in a year, they don't get any real credit for that, because any randomly chosen minor leaguer could have done the same. By your own admission, they could have gotten an American to do your job. So the work you've done hasn't really created new jobs. Those jobs could have just as easily been created by your replacement.

      Please don't take this as an attack on you. It's not. If it were up to me, we'd let in any intelligent, hard-working technical worker and fast track them for a green card. But your company broke the law by hiring you when an American could have done the job. They did so to save money, and it came at the cost of driving down the standard of living for everyone.

    7. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a PhD in US. Had another doctorate from before I got there. I returned back after ~9 years in US, since I found the post-docs not worthwhile (I lost interest in academia). I am surprised at how hard it is to find work in US now. It seems that all the places interested in me are not equipped to do a H1B. They are just not big enough. It looks like major operations like Infosys have this segment cornered.

    8. Re:H1B Scam by Pulzar · · Score: 2

      But your company broke the law by hiring you when an American could have done the job. They did so to save money, and it came at the cost of driving down the standard of living for everyone.

      You assume a lot. First, the criteria isn't that some American could've done the job, that would've taken just about every possible job off the list. It that's you've made a *reasonable* effort to find one and you didn't. Even if there are plenty of Americans in other cities who don't want to move, or the same city but with jobs they don't want to leave, it's still ok to hire somebody on H1-B.

      And, second, how do you know they got him cheap? Every computer engineering company I've worked at has been paying foreign visa employees the same salaries as local employees, and they had to deal with significant lawyer and visa expenses to get the work permits, and later applications for permanent residency. The H1-B has always been the least preferred option in hiring discussion because of all that extra work.

      Not every company is Infosys, and not every job is for an app developer. There are plenty of high-skilled engineering jobs out there that stay open for over a year because of the shortage of qualified candidates, and real and honest companies need to fill them to continue to do business and grow.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    9. Re:H1B Scam by Uberbah · · Score: 1, Troll

      You assume a lot. First, the criteria isn't that some American could've done the job, that would've taken just about every possible job off the list. It that's you've made a *reasonable* effort to find one and you didn't. Even if there are plenty of Americans in other cities who don't want to move, or the same city but with jobs they don't want to leave, it's still ok to hire somebody on H1-B.

      No, it means no American is able to fill the job for the ludicrous job requirements the company sets out. Either demanding 8 years experience in a language that's been out for six, or wanting applicants with doctorates and 15 years experience while offering pay suitable for a bachelors straight out of a community college. It's not like this is new.

    10. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1B has always been just smoke screen with the purpose of price-busting great income jobs. It's how big money figured out how to tip the job supply and demand equation. This is no.. and I do mean NO job that couldn't be done best by US workers.
      I have worked at jobs where great people were replaced by H1B's who had less talent but worked cheaper and kissed-ass all day.
      I also seen projects distroyed by crap work by the same H1B's
      H1B should be eliminated ASAP !

    11. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't get this moronic attitude. H1B's are not always some magic money making scheme for companies. We use H1B's where I work and we hate doing it as each H1B we bring in costs us around 10% more than what an American would. But we can't find enough skilled staff no matter how hard we try.

    12. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      +1. I had a bunch of open roles in Silicon Valley and it took 6 months to fill them. The mix ended up being some American citizens (the type born in India), some American citizens (the type the rednecks would call Americans), and some H1-Bs.

      $150k+ base with a few years of experience and heading up. Absolutely zip difference in offer based on your visa status.

      The 6 month ordeal wasn't because we're paying low, it's because the average lazy American (and lazy H1-Ber too) failed at the entry level coding questions so we had to keep looking. Lots and lots of people with experience who couldn't code their way through an elementary data structure.

    13. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But the comment you are replying to is right about the rest of what he said. There are H1-B abuses based on lowered labor cost to be sure. (Though the article
      is about the exact opposite: how the H1-B process and protections motivated Infosys to avoid H1-B's in the first place.)

      But there are also plenty of H1-B's being hired without any such games, with no job requirement hacking, no consideration for lower salary, indeed it is usually a net cost to the company. I have hired or been involved in the hiring process of many (maybe 30+) H1-B's in my career, and in each case if someone had mentioned any possible cost saving we would have just looked at them blankly, literally uncomprehending. And to prefer an H1-B over an close American who applied, that would be crazy. On the other hand, the salaries paid for the H1-B's I've been involved with have been >80k. And that understates things: the majority, including the majority of new graduates (which is most of them), would be > 130k/year. And I'm paying 130k to a *new grad* on H1-B rather than an American because ... why? Well, I'm sure you can think of various nefarious reasons (go to it!), but you can be sure "I can save a bundle of money that way" ain't on the list. Nor by the way is "she is locked in and can't move".

    14. Re:H1B Scam by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      But the comment you are replying to is right about the rest of what he said.

      And I'm talking about the H1-B program, who's only purpose is to broaden the labor pool for employers, and thus depress wages and benefits of employees. That's what the H1-B program is for, and the "reasonable" stuff is just a sham.

      Oh noes, they whine, no American will apply for our job! Well, have you tried offering more than $40k a year and overtime?

    15. Re:H1B Scam by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      They did so to save money, and it came at the cost of driving down the standard of living for everyone.

      this bears repeating.

      I have not had a cost-of-living raise in over 10 years. I'm lucky to even HAVE a job, at this point.

      the living standard for us 'workers' has gone down by a LOT in the past 10 or even 20 yrs. it was once easy to walk into a silicon valley company and see a mix of faces. not anymore. the locals are 'too expensive' (read: they want a living wage). instead we have sold out our own people to give the fatcats even more of the wealth.

      almost every other country takes care of its locals first and what is left over goes to the immigrants. I'm not sure why the US wants to take care of everyone else FIRST and our own people LAST ;(

      its fucked up. it really is.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    16. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And, second, how do you know they got him cheap? Every computer engineering company I've worked at has been paying foreign visa employees the same salaries as local employees, and they had to deal with significant lawyer and visa expenses to get the work permits, and later applications for permanent residency. The H1-B has always been the least preferred option in hiring discussion because of all that extra work.

      Not every company is Infosys, and not every job is for an app developer. There are plenty of high-skilled engineering jobs out there that stay open for over a year because of the shortage of qualified candidates, and real and honest companies need to fill them to continue to do business and grow.

      They are clearly paying less than market rate for H1Bs. The salaries of H1Bs is public record.
      http://www.devhub.us/h1b/work_city

      I happen to work in Sunnyvale, CA. They typical programmer makes 100k+ here. The typical H1B makes ~75k. If one is to assume that these are highly skilled hard to find positions, they'd be expected to be at the upper end of the salary range not 25% below the average.

    17. Re:H1B Scam by clay_shooter · · Score: 1

      Dump H1B. Instead of giving out Visa for foreign nationals, we should try to KEEP foreign graduates in this country - make it easier for foreign students graduating from US colleges to live and work in the US.

      That's an interesting idea. You would be retaining people that have already spent some time integrating into the society.

    18. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While not justification for the action; there is the case that this company might not have been able to afford the necessary resources to get off the ground without exploiting the H1B process.

      After having illegally bootstrapped themselves they are then capable of hiring locally and add more to the economy than would have happened if they wen't bust (or just outsourced all work).

    19. Re:H1B Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like in your righteous anger, you forgot to read the post you're responding to.

    20. Re:H1B Scam by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's lots of competent programmers here. Why didn't they apply to your company? Why did you just get the incompetents and/or the lazy? Was it because you weren't willing to pay market rates for the competent, possibly? Assuming I'd been in the area and looking for a job, why wouldn't I have applied? (I can do entry-level coding questions.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    21. Re:H1B Scam by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Looks like in your righteous anger, you forgot to read the post you're responding to.

      Looks like you're projecting your poutrage. Just because the post was trying to justify the unjustifiable, doesn't mean that anyone had a hard time understanding it.

    22. Re:H1B Scam by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm an H1B. I get way, way more than a living wage (I can basically comfortably support myself and my partner - a citizen, by the way - rent a large condo in a nice and expensive neighborhood, pay all bills, and still set aside a nice pile of cash for my savings account every month. I can assure you that I don't consume less than an average American (or even an average American in a similar job). I've also got significant raises every year since I came to the States.

      It would seem to me that if an American would be willing and able to do this job, the company that hired me wouldn't have to pay me anywhere near as much (don't forget that they also paid the bill for my relocation - from another continent, no less - paid for my H1B, and are now paying for my green card process).

      So, whose job am I "stealing", again?

    23. Re:H1B Scam by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      $150k sounds like the market rate in his area to me. Unless, of course, your definition of "market rate" is really "what I want to get", or at least "what I'd be able to get if there was a labor shortage on the market".

  8. Re:Seriously by icebike · · Score: 2

    They are not fining the workers, they are fining the company that brought them in illegally.

    The imported employees get spun off and transferred around so fast that the government loses track of them.
    Probably find dozens of them working on Obamacare web site right now.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  9. Further proof of the H1B visa myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are both good and bad reasons to grant Visas to tech workers. We should not turn down genuine talent that wants to work here. Having bright minds emigrate, work, live, contribute, and integrate here is probably one of the biggest foundations of America's success.

    What we don't want is a bunch of scum fucks importing slave-pay workers to save a buck. I say bring in the IT/tech talent, but on the condition they are paid competitive wages and compensation (And enforce that with some teeth!). You also need to make sure they have freedom and mobility so their sponsor company can't hold their visa over them as a form of extortion.

    Granting guest workers MORE privileges and protections will ensure that they're less attractive to unscrupulous outfits looking to save money instead of hiring available domestic talent. Companies that genuinely need foreign talent will happily pay for it.

    1. Re:Further proof of the H1B visa myth by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I think we should definitely allow and encourage the best and brightest to come here; the problem is not that we're doing that, but that we're not supporting the best and brightest HERE. In addition to all the sleazy financial reasons companies prefer foreign tech workers, there's a weird (and wrong) cultural perception in business that they're "better," but that's not really based on experience but rather just kind of fad-seeking echo chamber that is modern corporate America.

    2. Re:Further proof of the H1B visa myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know lots of H1Bs who work for Bloomberg. They are all exceptional and earn way more then most of the devs I know.

      Seriously, I'd love to hire them, but I can't afford $200k+, on top of the 4 years of legal fees they will need to get a green card. I've yet to see an H1B that is cheaper then your average highly paid NYC exceptional startup dev.

    3. Re:Further proof of the H1B visa myth by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      We should not turn down genuine talent that wants to work here.

      yes, yes we should turn they down!

      when people who have been born here, raised here, paid their dues here and have a vested interest in what happens here (long-term) can't find a job, you better BELIEVE we should give them preference. big-time preference.

      when our unemployment is reasonable again (low low single digit numbers) THEN its time to reconsider importing labor. but we have so many unemployed americans here, I find it disgusting that we import labor and watch our own go homeless.

      don't you protect your own family more than your casual friends? do you call that 'protectionism' ?

      taking care of your own people is not a sin or crime. its good business! and its good for our long-term health as a nation.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Further proof of the H1B visa myth by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's why I would prefer to do away with H1-B entirely. Make it a bit easier to get a green card instead.

    5. Re:Further proof of the H1B visa myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is that it's ultimately beneficial to bring the best from other countries to live here. For us. Read up on the idea of "Brain drain" for a bit and realize just how much it benefits the US.

      The idea, though, is that of a smart guy from across the globe costs a company more than a smart guy here, they will hire the smart guy here. However, there are cases where there are REALLY smart guys overseas and it's worth the premium to bring them to the US. They work, contribute, and enrich us as a whole. Historically, that ideas is as American as it gets. Good people coming here to seek a better life, and making the country better as a whole.

    6. Re:Further proof of the H1B visa myth by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Good people coming here to seek a better life, and making the country better as a whole.

      this isn't the 1900's early era.

      we're 'full up' right now. maybe come back later?

      seriously, we can't keep our own people working. and you want to disenfranchise those who have been born, raised and educated here so that we 'fix' some other countrie's problems??

      we have enough problems here of our own. we can't keep affording this endless 'fix the world' project. its bankrupting us. the middle class is disappearing and it IS the backbone of the US.

      early 1900's there was more work than people. now we have more people than work. what made sense back then does NOT make sense in the current era.

      yes, it sucks that in india, the conditions are bad. but I fail to see how making OUR conditions also bad is helping anyone. india should fix her own problems. we should fix ours.

      no new immigrants on h1b until we lower our national unemployment rate. if I was running for office, I'd run on that, alone.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:Further proof of the H1B visa myth by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      New people that are imported don't just "use up" work, they also create work. They rent apartments and buy homes, they buy groceries and other goods and services, they buy a car and drive it, they marry and have kids and pay for their education etc. This is especially true of skilled workers at the higher end of the pay scale, who have a lot of disposable income to spend on luxuries.

      The unemployment problem that exists in US has nothing to do with imported labor. Outsourcing is far more relevant here.

  10. Re:Seriously by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    The imported employees get spun off and transferred around so fast that the government loses track of them.

    Imagine a day when our total surveillance is applied to something useful like flagging people who've overstayed their visas and looking for patterns of abuse.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  11. They really should DIAF by line-bundle · · Score: 1

    I am angered and saddened by what companies like Infosys have done to the US immigration system. I remember having to fight really hard to get my first H1B in the US because of those companies (I got my US higher ed paid by the NSF yet I'm not American, and I'm not a programmer).

    After they have completely wrecked the H1B system they are now going to wreck the visitor visa system.

    I am angry because they destroyed the reputation of the H1B system, one of the few legal ways to become a citizen. I am saddened because Americans are have a stupid immigration debate on fundamentally illegals, yet leave such monsters prowling the halls of congress.

  12. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad but probably true.

  13. A lot of subcontinent firms gaming the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Infosys is not the only one gaming the system. My fortune 20 company is addicted to these "by the pound consultants" from the likes of Infosys/Tata/Berlasoft/you-know-who-you-are as well. There is zero effort put into sourcing local staff and the company pays substantial sums to these firms (who pocket half or more of the hourly rate) when they could just as easily get local employees for the same cost. Then there's the poor sods that are being raped by several levels of middle men and have to live 10 to a flat to make ends meet. The only real benefit to the local firm is the ability to extract hours out of these poor saps that local employees would balk at...as well as the ability to hire/fire on a whim rather than engage in any significant long-term planning.

    The end result is a revolving door of consultants, poor productivity, poor knowledge retention, and poor morale on the part of both the "wage slaves" and the local staff who are interacting with them. And it's readily apparent that this local firm could hire local staff for approximately the same money and improve productivity and morale at the "cost" of not being able to bully wage slaves into working 60 hour weeks for a pittance (once the contractor firm cut is extracted).

    Let's end the practice of enriching the TCS/Infosys companies of the world at the expense of college grads in this country (both foreign born and native born).

  14. So don't make the H1-B such a pain by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    First there was the green card
    Then it got slow, bloated and hard to get.
    So they invented the H1-B which was quick and easy.
    Then it got slow, bloated and hard to get.
    So they invented the guest worker pass
    continue....

    Just fix the green card and the others are unnecessary. If someone is a net benefit to the country, there's no reason to limit their stay.

    The US government provided the visas and the visa rules to Infosys. It looks to me that they took the hint. The US does not look like it 'wants' people on H1s or Green cards because it makes it a stupidly slow, expensive and complex process to get them. The message they send by making the B1 relatively easier to get is - "Get a B1, we want to you get a B1, not those other visas".

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  15. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or intercepting communication that indicates government corruption and automatically uploading it to wikileaks :D

  16. And how much profit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $35 million fine, eh? So I imagine that means that Infosys was actually able to make $1 billion+ in profit using this tactic? The fines for white collar crime never even come close to making the practice of breaking the law unprofitable. They'll probably even get the govt to issue a statement of no wrong done to get them to agree to not fight the settlement. Such has happened half a dozen times with Goldman Sachs. They're found to break the law, make billions doing it, get fined less than 1% of the profit and get the govt to say they did nothing wrong.

    Expect to see more companies adopting this abuse of the Visa system as standard practice. If Infosys made $35.001M profit using this tactic, any business would see themselves as negligent if they did not immediately start breaking these laws.

    Crime DOES pay kids. And it pays BIG. Just make sure it is white-collar crime and you do it in the name of a corporation. Even though white-collar crime costs 10x as much to the economy and kills 11x as many people as street crime, those in our society just do not care.

    1. Re:And how much profit? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      No. People like to inflate things. $35M was probably considerably more than the delta between the salaries they paid the Indians vs. how much they would have paid locally.

  17. Crooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is every company run by crooks?
    It sure seems so, and anything not expressively illegal is fine.

    Is that why everything is so fucked up.
    And when you do get caught oh well its just a fine.
    No harm no foul.

    1. Re:Crooks by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      And they wonder why people come to believe that capitalism is evil.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
  18. This should result in at least a 1B fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crass acts of willful disrepect towards labor laws should result in the most severe fines and punishment available. In addition, the ones responsible for hiring these workers should be fined 1M apiece and sentenced to 1 year hard labour.

  19. Re: Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep! And relize the imports are the ones who couldn't find work at home probably because they suck at it, but because that will get 1/4 the compensation a native born worker would, they end up a hot commodity... And we wonder why we have economic problems! Americans can't or won't be able to pay the bills in the coming years... Go figure!

  20. From Obama? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 0

    And yet, Obama lets millions(?) of illegal immigrants take low-skilled jobs from U.S. workers, without consequence. He actually knowingly lets them stay; he even has the Border Patrol release them.

    1. Re:From Obama? by Virtucon · · Score: 0

      That's so they can vote for him during elections because at the same time his Attorney General goes after states who try to enact voter id laws and try to protect their own borders.

      What's sad and what we're seeing now with the recent Supreme Court Ruling is the fact that States can't ask for proof of citizenship when registering to vote. Talk about a fucked up situation because like it or not it opens up the door for ineligible voters to vote in our elections, it's happening now but with the constant interference in State run elections and inaction on immigration and border security you'll never be able to accurately quantify it.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  21. Ban Infosys and others like them from the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a (former) H1B myself this truly pisses me off to no end. I came here for my undergrad for a quality education (dropped close to 80K$ being an international student) at a top university and graduated with enviable grades and I had to struggle to find a job simply because companies like Infosys illegally place thousands of workers on jobs that otherwise people like myself or US citizens/residents would be doing.

    H1B (rightfully) evokes negative feeling in the American populace for this exact reason. Companies like Infosys thru their illegal staffing practices are responsible for formulating the image of an H1B the broken english speaking trained monkey who can type and is willing to work for pennies on the dollar with his head down. I really hope that in the coming years this image changes coz there are thousands of us who come here to get a world class education (at a premium cost) and expect to make a living here.

    Peace.

    1. Re:Ban Infosys and others like them from the USA by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Change the law to limit the number of H-1B visas that a company may sponsor to not more than 10% of their worker base in the same field (e.g. percentage is applied to each type of job). Then limit the B-1 visas to a maximum of 63 days within the past 365 days (plus 2 travel days for each entry/exit). And while at it, allow any H-1B holder (the person) to change employer when they or the employer is willing to pay all the visa costs to the sponsor that paid them.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  22. H1B != B-1 by slew · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think people are confusing H1B (which have their own problems), with the B-1 visas that Infosys was caught abusing...

    H1B are for employing people that live HERE to work HERE and are paid at a level to live HERE. B-1 visa are for people that live THERE, but are temporarily working HERE, but are paid to live THERE (which is generally much lower). For example, a person employed with the same company but lives say in India, that needs to come to the US to attend a meeting, or conference, or perhaps for a couple months for training or maybe even negotiate a contract in person would need a B-1 to get into the country (you technically can't do any of these things on a tourist visa).

    The duration of an H1B is 3 years (extendable to 6 years), the duration of a B-1 is typically 6 months (extendable to 1 year). Think of the B-1 as a visitor visa to do technical visiting (there is a separate P-visa for an athlete or artist to make a performance in the US for money which is another type of visa).

    The abuse that Infosys was doing is that they were submitting manufactured documentation for the B-1 that they were coming to the US to attend training, meetings or conference, but employing B-1 visa folks to work on long term projects. That is a big NO-NO because then you can paying foreign wages (instead of H1B equivalent wages) to people work on projects even though they are here, undercutting everyone (including H1Bs).

    Infosys could have gotten the "death-sentence" (which some companies have gotten) which is no B-1 visas for a year, but they are of course big enough to avoid that and only need to pay $35M. This slap on the wrist is what to get upset about, not tangle this up with the separate H1B discussion. At least H1Bs are supposed to get paid a prevailing wage and their numbers are supposed to be limited, so at least on paper, it's reasonable. There are none of the similar statutory limitations on a B-1, so when you are abusing it, you are really going to town.

  23. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1

  24. It's migra! It's migra! by Alejux · · Score: 2

    I can just imagine someone screaming that and suddenly all the programmers running out of their cubicles in panic!

  25. Make all contract work illegal by Skapare · · Score: 1, Troll

    So many problems will be addressed by that.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  26. You're doing it wrong by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    These were short term visas. Require these 'visitors' sponsors to delivery proof of exit (plane tickets, etc) or deliver the 'visitors' to INS for deportation for overstaying. Failure by the sponsor results in daily fines to cover 3x costs of arrest and deportation, and equal punitive damages. Too many and these sponsors lose their privilege to use these visas, fire at least 3 years.

    And after, say, 7 days overstay, fine the sponsors client where the visitor was working, which is registered in advance.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:You're doing it wrong by Alioth · · Score: 1

      They already do. If you come in on a visa, you get a white I-94 card when you arrive, and you return this I-94 when you leave. It's how the DHS knows you don't overstay. If the airport authorities have collected the I-94 and you boarded the aircraft, they know you have left.

      They will deport you if you overstay. The trouble is if someone overstays, since the US so far doesn't insist on making visitors wear a GPS tracker, you have to go and find them to deport them which can be quite difficult.

    2. Re: You're doing it wrong by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      So make the sponsor either responsible or penalize them. Overstays could be considered 'working after expiration'. And if they aren't working for the sponsor, make the sponsor, liable for losing them.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  27. RBC in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Royal Bank of Canada did the same shit here in Toronto. Fired a bunch of tenured people "after" they trained their own replacements without knowing it. Bloody disgusting.

  28. This is ***MUCH*** more than money !! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0

    I'm sure Infosys made more than $35mln by bringing those programmers in the way they did. Aside from not having to pay for the H1B visas, they could pay the programmers much less this way.

    Why are you guys looking only at the dollar $$$igns ?

    What Infosys had trespassed is way much than mere money.

    What Infosys had indeed done was breaking THE SOVEREIGNTY of The United States of America !!!

    Every country has its own set of laws, and the laws signified that that country has its own sovereignty over what transpired INSIDE its own border.

    What Infosys did, by bringing in FOREIGNERS from OUTSIDE of the country, and put them to work ILLEGALLY, INSIDE the country, Infosys has IGNORED THE SOVEREIGNTY RIGHT of the United States of America !!!

    And that company, Infosys, itself is a FOREIGN COMPANY !

    Why are we allowing a FOREIGN COMPANY to carry out such an illegal act of violating our nation's sovereignty, inside our country ?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:This is ***MUCH*** more than money !! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      You need some TERRORISM in there some where.

      Much though I find their actions disgusting, and hope they die young, painfully and soon... sovereignty is something that, in the age of the internet, is willfully disobeyed and more frequently, is necessary as a result of a failure in government.

    2. Re:This is ***MUCH*** more than money !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "TERRORISM"

      Good point. If just one of those they brought in illegally was found to have engaged in "terrorist" activities, this would get a lot more attention.

  29. Actually the US gov't doesn't like it either by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the IRS has been cracking down on companies that hire contractors for what are really full time positions. Contractors pay a lot less in taxes (well, the companies do, the contractor gets screwed but over all it's less tax revenue) and generally cost local gov'ts more.

    The people winning are the corporations that get to drive down labor costs while using the United States' expansive military to make the world safe for their bank accounts.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Actually the US gov't doesn't like it either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon since I don't want to reveal who I am.

      I am the only American in engineering an American company that is nearly 98% Indian-employed. Right here in silicon valley.

      Everyone but me is fulltime. I am a contractor. I get no benefits while others do.

      Does this show that the system is skewed and broken? Sure seems like it to me.

  30. Are you really really surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hint: I am in India, though I do not work for "Indian" company.

    All my friends in TCS, Infosys, Wipro etc., went to US through B1 route if the duration was less than 2-3 months. B1 Visa explicitly forbids working, but is for meetings and stuff.
    Yet they went on customer sites etc.,
    They are even trained to give specific answers to Immigration and say a lot about meetings and stuff. Some are even booked as members on cheap conferences spaced 15-20 days apart so it all looks like the real deal.

    These companies are unethical scum, and due to their bottom feeding attitude, they have spoilt the reputation of the "Indian software Engineer". The world now views the Indian software engineer as a low cost labour intensive guy fit for only data entry with the help of a spell checker.
    That brush gets broadly applied to us product design software engineers doing real software work, and getting 2-3X the salary the bottom feeders pay.

    Speaking of ethics, employees of these companies take their Earned or Paid leave, and then come to office, so that do not lose out the govt sop of leave travel allowance. But any actual leave is hard to come by unless you are on bench.

    During their foreign stints, they were forced to handover any allowance in lue of extra working hours given to them by the employer(some US employers used to give sops) to their parent company.

    If you are hiring a cheap bottom feeder from India, all I can say is "All the best". The low quality work will blow up in your face 1-2 years from now, and no amount of patchwork will fix it.
    Then you will go to a bar after your layoff and lament how you only get cheap unskilled monkeys from India. But the fact is you are the retard who went bottom feeding and found only slime.

    1. Re:Are you really really surprised? by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 1

      If you are hiring a cheap bottom feeder from India, all I can say is "All the best". The low quality work will blow up in your face 1-2 years from now, and no amount of patchwork will fix it. Then you will go to a bar after your layoff and lament how you only get cheap unskilled monkeys from India. But the fact is you are the retard who went bottom feeding and found only slime.

      The people who hire the "cheap bottom feeder from India" won't be laid off, they are the ones doing the layoffs. The people mandating that we use the Indian slave labor are 2 levels below CEO. CEO->CTO->Director. Anyone below that has no choice, besides a mass exodus.

    2. Re:Are you really really surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case this is the correct response:
      1. That worker should be denied ever coming back to the US for any reason due to lying to immigration officials
      2. The company should be banned from sponsoring visas of ANY type since they were aiding and encouraging lying to immigration officials
      3. The company should be fined an extreme sum for defrauding American workers
      4. Those who directly encourged this behavior should be jailed.

  31. Re: Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure it is. you don't think rich conservatives get a good laugh at this stuff? It's even funnier cause they still get you the old fashioned way.
    and that is just comical.

  32. WHY is the DHS Investigating this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the purpose of the DHS to fight terrorism not crime? Ultimately the DHS will be a national police force.

    1. Re:WHY is the DHS Investigating this? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      The DHS oversees the Visa program along with the State Department.

      more info Here.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  33. They should have been booted by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Infosys and other companies that play games like this, should be denied business licenses, but at the least, should not be able to get any gov. contracts any more.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  34. Let me tell you guys something ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked in more than one US based corp. and they ALL do this. They all have immigration lawyers on payroll who write the templates for the invitation letters and they all have HR people coaching the first timers to the US on B1/B2 visas.

  35. Competitors are missing a GOLDEN opportunity by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    If a company is above board, all they have to do, is offer up a reward of getting H1B's local LEGAL jobs, if they will rat out situations in which they are employed illegally. By doing this, any company that chooses to cheat, will quickly get nailed.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  36. What else is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HSBC fucking laundered money for terrorists and all they got was a large fine. WHat else was going to happen to Infosys?

  37. TCODB by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    Lame, low governmental fines = The Cost of Doing Business. I suspect they could find this amount under their couch cushions.

    Major Federal violations such as this should _start_ at 10% of the total corporations' gross profits encompassing the entire time span of the violation, rapidly rising with discovery of any willful cover-up.

  38. I never realized this was fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked for several companies that hired big outsourcing contractors and they were using B1s. Bring them here for 3 months and go home for 1 month, rinse, repeat. It was actually preferred among most developers because then we could work side by side with these people and help them get up to speed rather than just tossing code and requirements over a wall and hoping for the best.

    I met some of my best friends this way. I really wish there was a way that they could have stayed.

  39. Give all H1Bs greencards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1Bs are valuable because they can't quit. So companies can pay them later and say 'they work harder than americans will work for less'. not if they can quit. Void all contracts signed in India as unenforceable under american law (and with a greencard they can't be deported for quitting, so it wont matter if there are penalties in India). limit employment agreements to 1 year. So after 1 year they can quit. None of these 'you can never quit' contracts or pay a huge fine.

    then you will see the real value. Every h1b I ever met quit as soon as they got there greencard for more money. Cognizant which is the largest h1b importer does not even file for greencards for most of their h1bs (google them you will see forums wtih 2000+ posts in a thread complaining about how they cant get greencards).

    if the goal is to bring the best and the brightest over here. dont we want them to stay? dont we want them to start businesses so they can hire people? h1bs are not allowed to work for their own business. they can't quit. companies generally force them move around the country at their own expense (they claim relocation, but its just 1 week in a hotel with no moving expenses). no raises. long hours. you complain, you are deported.

    so just make it a new greencard program. then we will see the value of h1bs. however, we also need to limit the contracts. Plus if they have greencards and do not have the fear of deportation hanging over them, they will be more likely to sue their employers for racial discrimination and unfair labor practices. H1bs make less. they are almost all from india. american born people make more. This is arguably racist. they can't sue or they get deported.

  40. Fine and block by phorm · · Score: 1

    I would say that two steps should occur:
    a) Fine
    b) Deny any future applications for H-1B or B-1 Visas. If that's not quite doable, just block the B-1's as they're what was abused.

    "You knowingly and illegally abused the process, you're not allowed to participate anymore" seems just to me.

  41. Bastards that destroys our business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't have any professionalism, and just wonder why the companies are sub-contracting for this.

    It's not a matter of xenophobia, it's simple, they are accepting contracts that are impossible for other companies to cover. Sometimes, contracts for free... That is very uncompetitive. When the others are out of business, they will start to make profit. Europe with all the recession needs to protect against those uncompetitive companies...

  42. h1b visas are racist to immigrants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every h1b I have worked with makes far less than Americans. This is essentially racist. I think American citizen programmers and technical people should fight for the rights of the immigrant h1bs against their racist employers and demand they be paid comparable wages.

    there is actually a really good case here. h1bs won't fight it because they are likely to be deported. which just adds to the racist argument.

  43. i agree it should me more than 35 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But tthatis not the only company. Sovereignbank was bringing more than 300 people from spain as tourist to work and after a while they start coming arounf newyork because of the security

  44. Formalin in food by shimul1990 · · Score: 1

    Formalin is a chemical compound used to preserve any thing which are required in research or other purpose. But if it is applied to preserve food such as fruits, fish etc. for long time & by applying in large amount it will be harmful for human body if any human being eat these preserved foods. It can create many physical disorders in human body including liver damage, kidney damage, cancer or many other disorders. This chemical is used by some greedy businessman in 3rd world country & that's the number of patients are increasing day by day. It should be stopped as soon as possible otherwise this problem will get worst in situation day by day.

  45. Shocked, I am SHOCKED. by TheRealDevTrash · · Score: 1

    That there's gambling going on here.

    --
    I used to be /dev/trash but Slashdot no longer allows slashes for usernames.