Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Admits Windows 8.1 Update May Bork Your Mouse, Promises a Fix

MojoKid writes "Microsoft has several valid reasons why you should upgrade to Windows 8.1, which is free if you already own Windows 8. However, there's a known issue that might give some gamers pause before clicking through in the Windows Store. There have been complaints of mouse problems after applying the Windows 8.1 update, most of which have been related to lag in video games, though Microsoft confirmed there are other potential quirks. Acknowledging the problem, Microsoft says it's also actively investigating the issues and working on a patch."

54 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. ..and mouse scroll. by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 2

    It's all borked..please be sure to fix the scroll button, too. The scroll speed is different each time i log in!!

    1. Re:..and mouse scroll. by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Another satiesfied Microsoft customer?

      Well, yes. We use it because for one reason or another, we have to, usually because a commercial product is required, and we complain bitterly about it -- who, that didn't actually work in Redmond, wouldn't? (Actually, that's not entirely true -- even there, people complain, but quietly, to trusted friends.)

      As to FOSS, yeah, my website and blog and my daughter's blog all run on a Linux box I administrate, using software I partly wrote, and if all I ever did in life was use EMACS to pound out Python, I'd drop Windows in a heartbeat. But some of us have things to do that can't be had from sourceforge.

      Mind you, I'm hanging onto Windows 7 with both hands. We have a touch screen laptop running Win8, and it's junk. Maybe it'll run Android some day.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:..and mouse scroll. by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're not kidding - things I've found wrong with it so far (less than 5 hours of use):

        - Takes 1-2 hours to install [facepalm]
        - Corrupts some Win8 Xbox game saves
        - Adds UEFI watermark which can only be removed by installing an update (requires reboot too)
        - Changes your folder/theme settings without permission
        - Changes the folders setup in Windows Explorer to promote Skydrive (ya right!) and buries everything useful at the bottom
        - Re-installs all the garbage you've spent hours uninstalling (bing/news/finance/etc)
        - Doesn't restore the start button, just adds a button to bring up the full screen start
        - Creates interface lag/"hiccuping" across all programs
        - Removes the lease offensive drop corner\
        - Enabled touchpad clicking on my mouse, despite the ELAN options showing it as disabled
        - Forces powder blue backgrounds on tiles which make reading difficult (no personalization option to change it)
        - Pins IE to the taskbar

      Everything in Win8/8.1 is counter to productivity and just makes me want to switch to a new OS, unfortunately I wasn't able to downgrade this system to Win 7 64bit and I'm still not confident in Linux's ability to remain stable/repair itself easily without having to frequently re-install.

    3. Re:..and mouse scroll. by Lisias · · Score: 2

      At least Microsoft support won't call you a stupid noob to your face.

      You get what you pays for, right?

      With FOSS, you can try to fix it yourself or pay someone to do that for you.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    4. Re:..and mouse scroll. by Lisias · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm still not confident in Linux's ability to remain stable/repair itself easily without having to frequently re-install.

      I'm using a Linux box for 4 years, without a single reinstall. Of course, I'm using a "more professional" one.

      Be aware that there's more than a single Linux distro, and not all of them focus on stability or security. The ones that focus on mimicking Windows tends to mimic it too much accurately, in my humble opinion.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    5. Re:..and mouse scroll. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You get the same thing with FOSS, or do you think everyone in the world can program and has the time to sift through their program's code to find an obscure bug the main developers overlooked or didn't feel like fixing? At least Microsoft support won't call you a stupid noob to your face.

      When was the last time you used Linux? In your world, I could complain about usiung Windows 3.1.

      Oh - wait. You've probably never used Linux.

      As an example, I recently replaced Ubuntu with Linux mint on a dual boot laptop. Got everything I needed, all the drivers, and every thing worked perfectly after a few mouse clicks.

      HeII, that's a complete OS change, and it's easier than a Windows update, which likely as not will bork something.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:..and mouse scroll. by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wow, you sure found a lot more problems with Windows 8.1 than I did. Really, I only had one problem with it: when booting, after making it past the Windows logo, it just sits at a black screen. You can move the mouse around at this black screen, but you can't log in or do anything.

      Other than it crashing to a black screen on boot, I've had no problems with Windows 8.1.

      Well, OK, I've posted about this on Slashdot before, and finally got it fixed. Apparently Windows 8.1 decided to nuke the drivers that came with my laptop and use broken ones instead. Reinstalling the original drivers fixed everything. So, thanks for that, Windows 8.1 upgrader.

      And because they're still hilarious, here are Microsoft's instructions for booting Windows 8/8.1 into Safe Mode. Note that the instructions to enter Safe Mode requires the computer to be booting successfully. Also note that they tell you that you can't use F8 to boot into safe mode any more, but don't tell you that it's now shift-F8. The bit about Windows 8 giving you no chance to hit this is actually true; I wound up powering off the laptop during boot to "trick" Windows 8.1 into taking me to the recovery menu. (As getting to the black screen counted as "booting" as far as Windows cared.)

      Shift-F8 does work, by the way, if you get lucky and hit it in that incredibly short window that the OS checks for it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    7. Re:..and mouse scroll. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At least Microsoft support won't call you a stupid noob to your face.

      That's right what they will do is joke about it with their friends while you are on hold and after you hang up.
      Been there seen that.

    8. Re:..and mouse scroll. by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What pissed me off the most is how they pushed the "bringing back the start button" in the press when in reality all it is is a shortcut for the fucking Metro start screen. This is why I call it "WinGoatse" as like a Goatse it was all just a trick to get you to go for it and isn't what you were expecting at all.

      What I have found here in the trenches is the only "work" folks want done on Win 8 is to remove the thing, I haven't seen this level of hatred from the public since WinME, even Vista wasn't THIS hated. They can give 1-100 SPs but until they let users have the choice of REALLY getting rid of the "LULZ I Iz A Cellphone LULZ, check out me appstore LULZ" bullshit I have a feeling my best business is gonna be in getting rid of 8 and selling Win 7 units.

      BTW just FYI but if you wanna go back to Win 7 download the trial of Driver Magician and choose "update drivers" followed by Win 7 X64, they usually have access to drivers for just about any piece of hardware and so far I have yet to run into a piece of hardware that I couldn't "downgrade" to Win 7..

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:..and mouse scroll. by rdnetto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm still not confident in Linux's ability to remain stable/repair itself easily without having to frequently re-install.

      I would say Linux is superior to Windows in that regard. I used to need to reinstall Windows yearly to keep the system running well, but after I changed to Linux the only times I've needed to reinstall it were when upgrading to the latest version of Ubuntu*, or changing distros.

      Actually, the main impetus for the switch came when my user profiles under Windows got corrupted and there was no way to recreate them without reinstalling it. Under Linux, the same problem is trivial to fix - just delete/rename the home folders and everything gets regenerated.

      *While you can upgrade without reinstalling, I've never trusted it after doing the same with Windows a few times ended badly. Since then I've changed to a rolling release distro, and now I don't even need to do that.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    10. Re:..and mouse scroll. by msobkow · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not even "adding a button." It's adding a button *graphic* in the lower left corner where there was *always* a "hot spot" to click for bringing up the menu windows.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    11. Re:..and mouse scroll. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I know it's unfashionable but I'm actually okay with my Windows 8 laptop. It boots from cold in under 4 seconds. On Windows 7 I replaced the start menu anyway because I prefer the old "all programs" menu, so I just did the same on Windows 8 and booted directly to the desktop at the same time. No issues with the 8.1 upgrade, seems just as smooth as before and everything works.

      Windows 8 itself is fine. The new task manager is nice, the flat look is nice, everything else is pretty much the same as it was in 7.

      I'm not in love with it or anything, but it's hardly another Vista.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:..and mouse scroll. by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, Windows 8 is fine... after you replace the UI shell.

      Please tell me why that makes Windows 8 OK? That you have a third-party workaround does not mean the original problem isn't still there.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:..and mouse scroll. by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Actually, the main impetus for the switch came when my user profiles under Windows got corrupted and there was no way to recreate them without reinstalling it.

      The end result is good (you ditching Windows) but this is incorrect. Safe mode, delete the profile directory in C:\Users, then reboot and log in. The user profile will rebuild. Of course, all your shit is gone unless you backed it up first, but even then you still have to put things back and fix your settings again.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re: ..and mouse scroll. by KingMotley · · Score: 2

      Hairy feet, as usual, you are misguided. People aren't switching to tablets because of anything Microsoft does are did. The switch was inevitable. A large portion if the population previously bought PCs to consume content, and when a better platform arrived, cheaper, mobile, and better for consuming content became available, those users switched to it.

      As for Microsoft listening, perhaps you should listen to yourself. The masses has spoken, and they wanted a more mobile, more touch friendly environment that gets out of their way while the user is consuming content. Lo and behold, that is EXACTLY the UI changes made to windows. It's touch enabled, it gets completely out of the way while the user is running the apps (consuming content), yet still allows them to continue running their old applications they are familiar with. Sounds like Microsoft listened pretty damn well.

      Or are you saying that people hate touch enabled devices that get the OS UI out of the way, and in order to protest their absolute hatred for how Microsoft has done that, they've all flicked to tablets... Which DO THE EXACT SAME THING!

      Lol.

    15. Re: ..and mouse scroll. by KingMotley · · Score: 2

      You provided citations that don't prove what you said you retard. Go google the citations yourself. I got better thing to do.

  2. You have to test the mouse for OS updates now? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow just wow now what enterprise app will get messed up with other stuff in windows 8 / 8.1 that was not tested before updates?

    1. Re:You have to test the mouse for OS updates now? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, if there was changes to the way mouse handling works.

      Apparently Windows 8.1 includes changes to how the mice/trackballs/etc work. Also, there's more than one way to interact with the mouse via the set of APIs available to windows developers. Some games exhibit odd mouse behaviors, some don't.

      This is a huge downside to the touted "backwards compatibility." Sure you're supporting a lot of apps, but a lot of those apps certainly do things the wrong way.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:You have to test the mouse for OS updates now? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, check the release note. Previously, you only had to fondle the dirty mouse balls. Now you need to suck the dirty mouse balls while rubbing the click wheel.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:You have to test the mouse for OS updates now? by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 2

      I am having the stuttering-skipping problem mentioned above. Funny thing, it only happens with a Microsoft Mouse!

    4. Re:You have to test the mouse for OS updates now? by mikechant · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Every time a USB drive was put in, a new device driver, and probably malware, was installed.

      It's even worse than that. It reinstalls the device drivers every time you plug the *same* device into a different USB port. I'd hoped this behaviour would go away when my WinXP work PC was replaced recently with a new Win7 PC, but no - plug USB headphones into each of the 4 front USB ports and it reinstalls the drivers 4 times. That's pretty brain-dead.

  3. Valid reasons? by bhcompy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft has several valid reasons why you should upgrade to Windows 8.1

    What are these reasons? I'm being serious. I have yet to see a reason to upgrade from Windows 7 this soon in the game

    1. Re:Valid reasons? by walbourn · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actual technical content in a /. article... Hmmm. not sure if that's really an option, but here goes a partial list of stuff you get in 8.1 and not with 7:
      • DirectX 11.2 hardware support including tiled resources, Feature Level 11.1 hardware support, etc.
      • Much improved Direct3D capture support when using VS 2013 Graphics Diagnostics
      • Native USB 3.0 support
      • 200% High-DPI scaling support
      • Bitlocker has been improved, particularly when initializing a new drive
    2. Re:Valid reasons? by batkiwi · · Score: 2

      -Faster boot times
      -Better SSD support
      -less ram used by OS
      -storage spaces if you have a bunch of disparate disks and want data redundancy

      And you can boot to your desktop so you never see "metro" if you don't like it.

    3. Re:Valid reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows 7-->Windows 8

      -Faster boot times
      -Better SSD support
      -less ram used by OS
      -storage spaces if you have a bunch of disparate disks and want data redundancy

      Conclusion: Windows 8 has a tiny amount to offer.

      Windows 7 or 8 -->Windows 8.1

      - you can boot to your desktop so you never see "metro" if you don't like it.
      - your mouse won't work.

      Conclusion: Windows 8.1 is essential if you hate working for someone. "Mouse no worky, I'm going to lunch."

    4. Re:Valid reasons? by smash · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Windows 2012 R2 RSAT requires the Windows 8.1 client OS. There are a number of improvements in 2012R2 in particular with regards to hyper-v, directaccess, etc. Also (and this is the point for me in particular), Windows 2012R2 and Windows 8.1 have vastly improved PowerShell support (vs. Windows 7) for doing stuff from the command line. Yes, I know the UI is a bitch, but 8.1 fixes some of the Windows 8 brain damage, and if you're in any way involved in IT you owe it to yourself to keep up with the times so you can actually slam/praise whatever OS based on actual experience rather than hearsay.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    5. Re:Valid reasons? by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Legit Question: If it needs less ram, then can you actually run it with less ram?

      It seems that line gets mentioned with every new release but it actually means ram usage quadruples.
      Remember that XP only needs 128mb of ram to function.

    6. Re:Valid reasons? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I sure hope those are not the killer, must-have features and you just omitted the ones that only a tiny subset of users could possibly care for.

      • DirectX 11.2 hardware support including tiled resources, Feature Level 11.1 hardware support, etc.

      Is there any game maker crazy enough to make games that are NOT compatible with a Windows version below 8?

      Much improved Direct3D capture support when using VS 2013 Graphics Diagnostics

      Since I don't even know what this might entail, I'm fairly sure that I don't really care too much about it.

      Native USB 3.0 support

      I don't really think that the hassle of installing a USB 3.0 driver in Win7 outdoes the hassle of having to deal with Win 8 in general.

      200% High-DPI scaling support

      See two features above.

      Bitlocker has been improved, particularly when initializing a new drive

      Why should I want to use an encryption service that has a better chance to keep me out of my files than the average three letter agency?

      The features you mention are nice, but they are not even remotely coming close to outweighing the troubles that I'd have to deal with when installing Win 8.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Valid reasons? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Informative

      8 is the usual "odd" version of Windows. For generations of Windows, you could only use every other generation.

      Win95? Good.
      98? Average
      98SE? Good
      ME? (this space left blank in the name of good taste)
      XP? Good
      Vista? Crap
      7? Good
      8? Do I really have to say anything about it?

      So, essentially, if the history of Windows teaches us something, then to simply sit and wait 'til the successor of 8 emerges, and hope that our Win7 installations will tide us over.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Valid reasons? by bhcompy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, 98SE counts, but 95OSR2 doesn't?
      Windows 2000 doesn't count?

      And Vista was actually fine. The major difference between 7 and Vista is that hardware was too far behind the improvements in the interface.

    9. Re:Valid reasons? by locopuyo · · Score: 2

      I use 8 not 8.1. The only real noticeable improvement over 7 is startup time. My PC boots up in 10 seconds. It is on before I finish turning on my monitors.
      The full screen start menu bothered me at first, but I actually like it better now. Pretty much everything else is the same as Windows 7.
      A lot of people complain about the metro stuff but they are just being stupid. There is nothing forcing you to use the metro apps on a PC, just use the desktop versions.
      If you're building or getting a new machine I would put 8 on it, but I wouldn't upgrade an existing machine form 7 to 8.

  4. Watermarks by Microlith · · Score: 5, Informative

    And give me the ability to hide that stupid "Secure Boot isn't configured correctly" watermark sitting on my desktop! I have it turned off for a reason, I don't need to be harassed constantly about it.

    1. Re:Watermarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      to microsoft, that notice is and was not a "bug" it was a feature designed to scare people into having secure boot on, insuring that only microsoft-authorized operating systems would run on that hardware.

    2. Re:Watermarks by Microlith · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was only a bug when it appeared on systems with secure boot enabled, on systems without secure boot, and on Windows RT devices. It still appears on my system because I explicitly turned it off. Now I want to hide the notification.

    3. Re:Watermarks by mastershake82 · · Score: 5, Informative
    4. Re:Watermarks by Microlith · · Score: 2

      THERE! Thank you. No more watermark. I wonder if this was their fix for the other systems afflicted with this message.

    5. Re:Watermarks by Jmc23 · · Score: 2

      haha, classic. Bitching does help.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    6. Re:Watermarks by Lisias · · Score: 2

      Bitching about reality does nothing to change reality and just ruins your peace of mind.

      If you don't bitch about what you want fixed, things simply will not be fixed.

      I got my peace of mind using things that does not annoys me.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
  5. Windows 8.1 Update May Bork Your Mouse by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess that's one way to get people to use the Metro touch interface.

  6. It isn't just MS Mice by laffer1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    SteelSeries mouse drivers will cause the Windows 8.1 upgrade to fail.

    Microsoft really screwed something up with the Windows 8.1 mouse drivers. They really need to get this fixed.

  7. There is a simple fix by richardw01 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a simple fix... they added some new mouse settings that cause the mouse to stop working while typing with a small delay... the settings are buried in the metro UI.... here is how to fix it: 1. Go to the windows setting in the metro UI, for me I just put my mouse pointer in the upper right of the screen until the "search, share, start, device, settings" pop up appears, click the settings icon. 2. click on the change PC settings at the bottom. 3. Click on PC and devices. 4. click on mouse and touch pad 5. under the touch pad settings set the delay to no delay.

    1. Re:There is a simple fix by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting... that feature actually makes sense, in most contexts outside of gaming. I can't count the number of times I've called my laptop bad names because the cursor jumped while I was typing, due to me accidentally brushing against the touch pad. It's unfortunate it doesn't distinguish between a built-in touch pad and an external mouse though.

  8. The solution to all Windows 8 problems... by Cyfun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is to install Windows 7.

    Assuming there's driver support.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dot slashes YOU!
  9. Mouse works fine, Sandy Bridge HDMI not so much by QQBoss · · Score: 2, Informative

    I installed 8.1 and the first two things I noticed- 1) it reset my icon size to medium, which on my 2560x1440 monitor looks ridiculous and given how they imported all my other settings... why? and 2) the HDMI output of my motherboard stopped working. After installing 8.1, I did some searching and apparently Sandy Bridge was not included in Intel's beta driver development for graphics for 8.1 and there is no known development being done for Sandy Bridge, so if I want to continue using my computer to communicate via the HDMI port to my television I need to upgrade to an Ivy Bridge, drive my 'small' 2nd monitor off of VGA (no fscking way, but supposedly analog ports off of S.B. are working fine- I haven't tested it), or upgrade my video card to one that can drive a 3rd (non-DP) monitor. Yes, I could also switch my DVI 2nd monitor to the mobo and put my TV into the HDMI on my video card, but that causes some really strange window relocation issues when waking out of sleep- I have tried that in the past.

    For people using only on-board video via HDMI to their sole monitor and without a desire to upgrade S.B. or buy a new computer, it must be enraging. I guess I am lucky, upgrading this motherboard (ASRock Extreme4 Gen3) to Ivy Bridge was something I was planning to do this month, anyway. For Intel not to include Sandy Bridge, a chip only about 2 years old, in their driver development for 8.1 is pretty lame. A Microsoft suggestion was to reinstall the Intel video drivers with compatibility settings for Win 7 or 8, but that didn't work for me.

  10. Re:They're doin' it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's a patch here which fixes it, also speeds up your computer and makes it look a lot better.

  11. Re:I told them to fix it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked at a place where a big piece of production code, a 17 year-old MS-DOS application likely written in C or assembler, was nowhere to be found. The executable form was copied and used at least 10 times a day to ship product, and yet nobody knew where the actual code was.

    More disturbingly, that same place had implemented FPGA code which was programmed at the board-house, and one of the internal reasons for the big push to our latest product is that nobody now in the company understands that FPGA code, and yet as with the example before those things are used on a daily basis in a production environment. That company is a division of a big and instantly-recognizable name in technology.

    One company I worked for that makes optical transceivers for your big-name optical switches/routers/etc. like Juniper used Excel as a database. No shit. The manufacturing test "database" was just one goddamn Excel spreadsheet written to by VB over Labview. I distinctly remember having to manually redraw the border lines to keep up with the resizing of the spreadsheet due to test data constantly being written to the spreadsheet.

    And those aren't even the worst of my stories. And I'm just a lowly technician.

    -- Ethanol-fueled

  12. Re:I told them to fix it by DigitAl56K · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just want you guys to know that as a developer I have been debugging what I believe to be the side effects resulting from these changes all week. It's not just "mouse co-ordinates" that are affected, you have some very common APIs scaling window co-ordinates in totally unexpected and inconsistent ways now. You have totally broken certain application behaviors, and only in 8.1, and while I found a workaround for my use case I can also see that the workaround I'm using will break more things for others.

    Next time you ask yourselves, "should we make these APIs suddenly behave differently than in all older versions of the OS?" there should be a very, very high barrier to saying yes, especially for a service pack release.

  13. Re:Win8.1 borked a lot of things by Microlith · · Score: 2

    Forcing signing to a Microsoft account when you restart until you fail signing in 3-5 times then it lets you do a local account

    I hated that. At least you could easily skip it in the original Windows 8 setup. The other solution is to disable network connectivity, it then will let you skip creation of a Microsoft account.

    It's probably the most underhanded way I've ever seen to try and herd people into your services.

  14. MS knew the Win8.1 DPI scaling was messed, yet by Gordo_1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    still released it that way in spite of the problems. Arrogance is the only logical explanation.

    This has been a well documented problem from earlier preview builds and was specifically not fixed in the RTM code because... well because MS seems to think it can make unilaterally bad UI decisions again and again and get away with it.

    Try setting your Win8.1 display to 150% on a 1920x1200 monitor. This is exactly where I've used WinXP, WinVista, Win7 and Win8, yet in Win8.1, a random assortment of applications (including many MS utilities and 3rd-party programs) deliver barely readable fuzzy characters. At least in Win8.0, you could set a master switch to tell the OS to disable DPI scaling, but in their infinite wisdom, some group within MS decided that to hell with useability, they're going to simply remove the master switch and force ALL users to disable DPI scaling on an app by app basis, making it bloody well a gargantuan effort to avoid either fuzzy or tiny text.

    It's absolutely appalling... About as appalling as MS deciding that Win8.0 users shouldn't be able to boot into desktop mode on a non-touchscreen device and then completely removing the start menu as if giving the middle finger to the existing install base was some kind of magical shortcut back to a dominant market position.

    If you're arrogant, but generally make good or at least non-destructive UI decisions, most people will forgive you. When you're arrogant and make butthead UI decisions, well, then you're MS.

      They've managed to marry Apple's arrogance with butthead UI decisions.

  15. Re:They're doin' it wrong by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why bother fixing it? Just censor the problem like the other fruity company.

    You're right, I never heard about Apple censoring their OS screwing up mice. They really censored that pretty well.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  16. Re:8.1 is an Improvement by hey! · · Score: 2

    I was OK with 8.0. I've reached the point where I hate the new versions of everything (except maybe XFCE, which is pretty much pitched toward people who hate the new versions of everything). The reason is all this struggle to revolutionize the user experience seems to have left the goals of making common tasks convenient for the user behind. Impressive but pointless seems to be à la mode these days, and designers appear increasingly incapable of distinguishing creativity from novelty.

    But given that virtually everybody has caught this disease, I pretty much have given up on insisting that things making sense. I only ask for a few things, that a user interface be stable and respond consistently (consistency was a huge problem with Vista), and that I can figure out how to do what I need done after a few days with the system. Windows 8.0 fit the bill. It didn't make much *sense*, but it didn't crash and responded in a stable way so I simply adjusted to its quirks.

    Windows 8.1 doesn't fit the bill, because it doesn't respond consistently; it brings back some of the Vista experience of having the OS throw unpredictable little delays into your work. The file manager windows are especially bad (e.g. when you're ejecting a drive). How in Hades' name could someone screw up something like that in 2013?

    And the 8.0 to 8.1 upgrade process was terrible. It was so poorly designed from an HCI standpoint that I was actually tempted to believe it was an abusive prank by a disgruntled MS employee.

    MS these days is looking to ever more like Lotus Software in its declining days. Despite being located in city crowded with world class universities, Lotus seemed utterly incapable of addressing even basic user interface problems except by pasting cheery looking wallpaper over them. I used to reflect when I passed their headquarters on Land Boulevard that if they put up a billboard say "We'll pay $100,000 to anyone who can fix our stupid UI problems," probably twenty or thirty people a day would see it who could probably take them up on the offer.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  17. keyboard still needed for typing / coding by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    keyboard still needed for typing / coding.

    I don't see any big typing work being done on a keyboard.

  18. Re:They're doin' it wrong by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Informative

    This update breaks mouse in GAMES.

    So your update breaks games entirely. A pretty steep downgrade.

  19. Re:I told them to fix it by Luckyo · · Score: 2

    I'd grab a bean bag one :D