Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Bitcoin Exchange Vanishes, Taking £2.5m of Coins With It

An anonymous reader writes "A Chinese Bitcoin exchange has vanished without trace, taking more than $4 million of the virtual currency with it and leaving profit-hungry investors out of pocket. GBL, the Chinese Bitcoin exchange was launched in May 2013 and putatively based in Hong Kong, despite its servers being registered in Beijing. However GBL's Hong Kong offices do not exist. GBL mysteriously disappeared in early November taking an estimated $4.1m (£2.6m) of Bitcoins with it." (Beware the auto-playing ads, with sound.)

67 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. Sad Trombone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes. Sad Trombone.

    1. Re:Sad Trombone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it'd be interesting to have a database of "story, first post" combos. Probably are some other epic ones out there.

  2. Recurring theme? by jythie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am assuming it is only a minority of exchanges, but doesn't this seem to be a bit of a recurring problem?

    1. Re:Recurring theme? by skovnymfe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares so long as it's only end users that suffer?

    2. Re:Recurring theme? by slashmydots · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only pattern is stupid people losing their money. The last time it was sketchy investments that only a complete idiot would fall for. There's no stopping stupid people from being stupid. Without stupid people, the tiny exchange that is obviously Chinese run and thus obviously a scam would have zero customers.

    3. Re:Recurring theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, ooh, I know this one! The difference is that a fly-by-night website will be taking credit card orders, and you can get a chargeback through your credit card bank when they don't show up with the merchandise.

    4. Re:Recurring theme? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 5, Informative

      Banks are insured.

    5. Re:Recurring theme? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In this case the "bank" is the robbers. This is very different from your typical heist.

    6. Re:Recurring theme? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sadly no, people seem to cling to bitcoins no matter how many times this happens. The kind of people drawn to anonymous decentralized currencies aren't the kind that are going to be deterred by measurable financial risk.

    7. Re:Recurring theme? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Because the rubes in this case should have been aware of the risks, getting involved in an untraceable currency. It's practically designed for illegal activity, so the news here is fly-by-night should be assumed to be the default.

    8. Re:Recurring theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not untraceable. Why are detractors so uninformed? After 4 years you have still failed to learn anything about it.

    9. Re:Recurring theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh the naivety.

      Perhaps you've heard of Barclays, USB, or Goldman Sachs.

    10. Re:Recurring theme? by gaelfx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You haven't read much news lately, have you?

    11. Re:Recurring theme? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The kind of people drawn to anonymous decentralized currencies aren't the kind that are going to be deterred by measurable financial risk.

      The kind of people who use an anonymous decentralized currency as an investment (and leave their investment sitting in the exchange) are not the typical users of bitcoins. Once you have BTC, why not transfer that directly to your wallet? Why keep it in the uninsured exchange at all?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    12. Re:Recurring theme? by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am assuming it is only a minority of exchanges, but doesn't this seem to be a bit of a recurring problem?

      It's the early days. The early days of banking had similar problems as well.

      A bigger issue though is a LOT of exchanges want a LOT of personal information in order to do the exchange.

      The real risk is not one of these exchanges disappearing, but getting broken in - tons of them ask so much personal information that you're at a real risk of identity theft or having your bank account drained.

      The others, well, can seem sketchy at times.

    13. Re:Recurring theme? by nogginthenog · · Score: 2

      So the US/UK bank bailouts never happened right?

    14. Re:Recurring theme? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      It's functionally untraceable, or at least trivial of launder, because the envelope only includes encrypted information about previous owners.

    15. Re:Recurring theme? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Even doey eyed idealists like convenience.

    16. Re:Recurring theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The really stupid thing is that such an "exchange" does not offer "sketchy investments". The "sketchy investment" is the actual Bitcoin. I've seen no sites offer actual interest or anything: they just offer to keep your Bitcoins. And that's profoundly stupid since a Bitcoin wallet is just a private key, all the rest is the public bitcoin chain. There is no point in keeping your wallet anywhere but on your own computer. Or on external storage media. I don't get people who use web services to keep a Bitcoin wallet: that's totally missing the point of what Bitcoins are.

    17. Re:Recurring theme? by Immerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed. It's about as far from untracable as you can get - you can trace every bitcoin back through every transaction it has ever been involved in to the moment of its creation - try to do *that* with cash. In fact except for the minor fact that you don't have to attach your name to an account it's a surveillance currency buff's wet dream.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    18. Re:Recurring theme? by Immerman · · Score: 2

      So what I don't get is why people would keep their bitcoins in one of these "banks" at all. Are they paying decent interest rates comensurate with the risk of trusting an unknown entity with your money? I don't see how they could be adding any actual security - if someone can steal my wallet credentials from my personal computer they can just as easily steal my "bank account" credentials.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    19. Re:Recurring theme? by mbkennel · · Score: 2


      | So what I don't get is why people would keep their bitcoins in one of these "banks" at all.

      So they can trade bitcoins frequently.

    20. Re:Recurring theme? by vux984 · · Score: 2

      assuming you either have a buyer or a place willing to take them

      If you have that, then you have money. That's the definition of "money".

      bitcoins "value" fluctuates.

      Another normal feature of money.

      bitcoin exchanges aren't banks

      Depends on your definition of 'bank'.

      For some it qualifies, for others it doesn't. It's certainly not anywhere near as well regulated or reliable as a typical first world bank... but it may not be far off from local banks 200 years ago, or banks in other less well regulated countries even today.

      those that use them deserve what they get

      Not sure anyone deserves to be robbed. But yes, they were taking a risk, and should have held assets there in proportion to the risk they were willing to take that this and various other things could happen to their assets.

    21. Re:Recurring theme? by wooferhound · · Score: 2

      All bankers are robbers. The only difference between the two is scale.

      Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank , Give a man a bank and he can rob the world . . .

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    22. Re:Recurring theme? by mjtaylor24601 · · Score: 2

      Kind of depends what you're trying to trace. When people talk about traceable financial transactions they're generally interested in identifying the people involved in the transaction not the individual monetary units.

      eg the police could give a @!#% that the $100 bill with serial number 12345 was used to buy drugs. What they want to know is that Bill bought $100 worth of drugs.

      In that sense bitcoin is good for untraceable financial transactions since (as far as I understand such things) the best we can determine is that anonymous bitcoin user #2627577 transferred 100 BTC to anonymous bitcoin user #820998.

      --
      I wish I were as sure of anything as some people are of everything
  3. I don't see a problem.. Follow the... by Mitsoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not just follow the bitcoin trail? Perhaps call the local authorities and ask them for help?

    >.>

    Actually, I do feel sorry... Just had to say it.

    1. Re:I don't see a problem.. Follow the... by Grantbridge · · Score: 2

      I agree, why don't people report bitcoins as stolen property. Then if anyone else tries to spend them they can be flagged as stolen and a court order made to force the current holder to turn them over to the legal owner, or pay damages if they refuse. Bitcoins are far more traceable than gold. If mining pools refused to add stolen bitcoins to blocks unless the transaction fee was >1BTC it would become infeasible to hide them by splitting them into many small transactions.

  4. Who can you trust now? by bobbied · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another exchange bites the dust, millions lost!

    BitCoin has some *serious* problems, mostly caused by not being officially sanctioned currency that is regulated... But then, that's it's strong point too. But, being a pirate has it's down days. So, if you sleep with dogs, you wake up with fleas (or in this case, w/o your BitCoin. ..

    Oh the humanity... Yawn.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Who can you trust now? by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. Pick your poison.

      If you want a decentralized, unregulated currency, then you don't get a FDIC promise when your bank vanishes overnight.

      I understand why some currency is transitory on these sites, but why are people using online wallets beyond coins in motion (escrow or pending transaction, etc.)?

    2. Re:Who can you trust now? by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin is like a little gold coin that you can magically transpose over the internet. If it's in your hands, it's as safe as any other valuable you own, with the perk that you can readily transact with it over the intertubes. However like any other valuable, if you send it halfway across the world to a complete stranger for safekeeping, then you're going to have a bad time.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Who can you trust now? by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's like my grandpa used to say: "Kid,if you want security, go with U.S. government savings bonds. If you want pussy and meth on the Silk Road, go with Bitcoin." This also explains why my inheritance was mostly in Bitcoins.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    4. Re:Who can you trust now? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

      > but why are people using online wallets beyond coins in motion...?

      Do you really need to ask why people are behaving foolishly? Most people just don't think about security.

    5. Re:Who can you trust now? by freeze128 · · Score: 3

      Dread Grandpa Roberts?

  5. Distributed security HEIST? by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bitcoin was advertized as the virtual currency NOT stored in one place with NO detrimental reliances upon any ONE server, person or gov't. WTF?

    1. Re:Distributed security HEIST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need to use exchanges to trade the bitcoins for real money, and these represent a handful of large points of failure.

    2. Re:Distributed security HEIST? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin was advertized as the virtual currency NOT stored in one place with NO detrimental reliances upon any ONE server, person or gov't. WTF?

      I don't know about this exchange, but there are a few Bitcoin management services, where they keep the wallet for you and you don't have to worry about running bitcoin yourself.

      It's almost exactly like how a bank will hold cash for you, except these banks are typically uninsured.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Distributed security HEIST? by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      didn't really think it was wise to stuff all their money in their mattresses â" even virtual, cryptographic mattresses

      So they elected to use a shady HK exchange instead?

      I think you're a bit too generous with your use of the word "wise" :)

    4. Re:Distributed security HEIST? by khallow · · Score: 2

      For stock market high frequency trade opponents, note this please. Here, we have a currency where it is physically impossible to trade at high frequency, yet speculators got around that obstacle.

    5. Re:Distributed security HEIST? by Immerman · · Score: 2

      I have never heard anyone mention instantaneous Bitcoin transactions except for people deriding the supposed claims. I've even had a few people try to deride my own posts on the subject despite the fact that I am fully aware of the inherent delays in the system and never made *any* claims to the contrary. If you've actually seen such claims on the BC forums etc. then I can only assume that either the people actually dealing with bitcoin are prone to extended blackouts after financial transactions, or are utterly incompetent and presume that the transaction is complete as soon as they hit the confirm button. In fairness I think most people assume the same thing about credit card purchases, and those sometimes don't get posted for days.

      Well, either that or you're full of it, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  6. Beware by Kardos · · Score: 2

    Autoplaying ads with sound? No thanks, the summary will have to do.

    This disappearing-with-all-the-funds is becoming SOP for exchanges.

  7. BitCoins aren't incompatible w/ reg. but... by sirwired · · Score: 2

    BitCoins are not incompatible with a normal regulatory and law enforcement apparatus that might prevent some of this. That said, due to their extreme utility for money laundering, tax avoidance, etc. I'm pretty sure they'd rather the things disappear and therefore may direct law-enforcement resources elsewhere in the case of a BitCoin theft.

  8. Here, random stranger, hold my wallet for me by petteyg359 · · Score: 5, Informative

    What idiot stores their cash in somebody else's wallet with no guarantee of that somebody's legitimacy and no insurance? Maybe these morons will have finally learned their lesson, and will keep their cash in their own wallets in their own pockets.

    1. Re:Here, random stranger, hold my wallet for me by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everybody who trades at the stock exchange through an intermediary, for example.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  9. Current Market Capitalization by janeuner · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those curious, there are currently 12 million bitcoin in existence, with a net value of about $4.3 billion.

    Source: http://coinmarketcap.com/

    1. Re:Current Market Capitalization by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 5, Funny
    2. Re:Current Market Capitalization by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2

      For many years they did give away promotional bird scarers and tea coasters, but I don't think they ever branched out to fishing equipment.

  10. Why we need regulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the 1% who spoil it for the rest of the honest people.

    And actually, it goes deeper than that. A capitlaist system requires trust. Rules and regulations build trust into the system. Without these rules and regulations you don't have capitalism, you have a Wild West financial system that no one would invest a dime in except suckers.

    1. Re:Why we need regulations by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      Sorry, sometimes it's hard to tell...

  11. bitcoin not like the real world by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2

    In a real market, no matter how dysfunctional, people want to make money - so stuff like this causes the value of whatever is being traded to go down.

    But the biggest bitcoin enthusiasts are just a little religious, so they'll go frantically buying bitcoins to raise the value to prove this isn't really a big deal.

    Almost like it's all a scam trying to pretend that TANSTAAFL doesn't apply and that you can really generate wealth with only speculation and no production.

    1. Re:bitcoin not like the real world by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2

      So, like a prepaid single usage Visa/Mastercard number? Or cash in an envelope?

    2. Re:bitcoin not like the real world by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      That's what I'm trying to convey, yes. (Whether that's an accurate picture, well...) You can see from this analogy why buying thousands of dollars worth of those and giving them to some random organisation in China might not be the savviest business move, while having one or two around for when you need them might be useful.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  12. Re:Money for nuthin'... by MarkvW · · Score: 4, Informative

    My dollar isn't just backed by lying bureaucrats. It's backed up by people with guns--big guns. And don't you forget it!

  13. Re:Government(s) by somersault · · Score: 2

    Then I doubt the US government would be in billions/trillions/whatever of debt.. they already have more than enough money from taxes - they just use it poorly.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  14. Re:Don't worry guys by Bengie · · Score: 3, Informative

    What do people expect when they hand over money to someone, especially when the money isn't regulated and is being held by an unregulated company.

  15. Eve Online by martijnd · · Score: 2

    All the ISK scams that went on in EVE Online are now here in "real" world Bitcoins. In fact, you can probably predict the next scandal from what dirty deeds were done before.

    But it it just me wondering if those involved think the punishment in the real world will be the same (none) ? I can imagine people being a little bit more upset after losing millions in real cash as opposed to losing some in-game fantasy currency.

  16. History Presages Regulation by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 2

    It was not that long ago that banks generally were subject to little or no regulation. Banks would fail, investors would lose all, only for the process to repeat itself again, and again. Eventually, in an effort to protect their economies, governments stepped to limit the risks that banks could take with their investors' money and, often, to insure the investors against loss, thereby engendering confidence.

    Bitcoin has made its stock in trade the fact that it is unregulated by anything but a few algorithms. Like Adam Smith'e "invisible hand", we are to trust to these algorithms to provide a certain Deus ex Machina for providing security.

    The reality is that until Bitcoin exchanges are regulated by credible authorities, security will be a fantasm.

    1. Re:History Presages Regulation by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 2

      You make a credible point, but then take it too far. The exchanges are the problem and the algorithms, which are the only security provided in the process, cannot address that. Therefore to assume the algorithms can provide the necessary level of security to the entire process, is fallacy.

  17. Re:Don't worry guys by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wasnt the whole point that people wanted an unregulated currency with no government involvement?

    Whats that old saying? "Be careful what you wish for."

  18. Re:Don't worry guys by Sockatume · · Score: 2

    They also routinely give you things "for free" like roads, healthcare, and a legal system. What's your point?

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  19. Non Banking Entity by Demonantis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is like all the people that get mad when paypal jerks them around. Don't use a non banking entity as a bank. There is huge history reinforced reasons why the industry is regulated.

  20. incorrect. pussy sold in $, or roses by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Grandpa was incorrect. If you wish to purchase pussy, $20 bills are the preferred form of payment. Though, I did notice some backpage ads listing 290 roses / hour.

  21. Now there's a surprise by H0p313ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm shocked, *SHOCKED* to find criminal activity happening in this unregulated currency exchange!

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  22. No FDIC doesn't insure banks by mbkennel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    FDIC insures bank's depositors against malefesance by the bank.

    Congress & the Treasury Secretary insures banks, but only if you're part of the in crowd like Goldman Sachs, and JP Morgan, and not Bear Stearns/Lehman Bros or thousands of less cool banks. And you don't even have to pay large premiums upfront---dinners, jobs and lobbying is so much cheaper than premiums.

    The commissioner of the FDIC during the crisis was pretty strenuously against insuring banks and look what it got her.

    1. Re:No FDIC doesn't insure banks by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      FDIC insures bank's depositors against malefesance by the bank.

      You mean something like "A Chinese Bitcoin exchange has vanished without trace, taking more than $4 million of the virtual currency with it ..."

  23. Not the main Chinese exchange by monk · · Score: 2

    I've never heard of GBL.

    The big Chinese exchange is BTC China.

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
  24. Normal behavior for Bitcoin exchanges by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Take the money and disappear" is normal behavior for Bitcoin exchanges. Sometimes they just disappear, sometimes they get broken into and robbed, and sometimes you're not sure whether the robbery was an inside job.

    The list of failed Bitcoin exchanges is long. Bitcash.cz just closed yesterday. There's an academic paper with a list. 18 of the 40 exchanges on the list had failed. But that was last January. Since then, Bitfloor and Bitme shut down, and Intersango and Mt. Gox stopped paying out customer funds on demand.

    Not one Bitcoin exchange is a bank or a registered broker/dealer in its home jurisdiction. That's part of the problem.

    This is why anarchy sucks. What anarchy looks like is Somalia, not L. Neil Smith fiction.