Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Planning an Electric Pickup Truck, Says Elon Musk

cartechboy writes "Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk says the company will make an electric pickup truck to compete with America's best-selling Ford F-Series pickups. Musk made the comment yesterday at the end of an interview at a tech conference in New York. Surrounded by questioners, Musk was asked if Tesla would ever make commercial fleet trucks (like for UPS or Fed Ex) and he responded that a consumer truck would be the company's best answer, because America's pickup truck sales numbers don't lie — that's what buyers want, and if Tesla wants to replace the most gasoline miles possible, that's what they should build. Musk said it will be about five years before the company builds its pickup however, giving it time to focus on another hurdle: breaking into the pickup market. Texas is where trucks rule, and Texas, as we know, is the Bermuda Triangle for Tesla." That also gives me five years to save up for one, and (just maybe) five years for Ford, et al to jump in, too.

293 comments

  1. Ford by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Informative

    and (just maybe) five years for Ford, et al to jump in, too.

    Ford has already made an electric Ranger.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Ford by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ford has already made an electric Ranger.

      So can we refer to that as a Power Ranger?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Ford by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Unpowered Ranger. Ford has stop production of the Ranger line. Well, of all light trucks in the USA.

    3. Re:Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Texas it needs to 4 to be wheel drive to win market share!

    4. Re:Ford by lgw · · Score: 1

      Really? Why so? I thought those sold well - are truck owners so intent on driving a bigger truck than the neighbor?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Ford by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Ford stopped sale of all light trucks in the USA for CAFE reasons, so what reason did they give for cutting the EV that wouldn't be negatively affected by CAFE?

    6. Re:Ford by Kilo+Kilo · · Score: 1

      The Ranger is so small that it's almost in a class of it's own and was never as popular as the F-Series. Modern "Full Size" pickups like the Ford F-150 and Ram 1500 are the staple of the pickup market. Yes, some people like to play the "my truck is an extension of my dick" game, but I don't participate in that, I drive a Tacoma.

    7. Re:Ford by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Ford stopped sale of all light trucks in the USA for CAFE reasons, so what reason did they give for cutting the EV that wouldn't be negatively affected by CAFE?

      They may say it was for CAFE reasons but the reality is that it costs them about the same to build a Ranger as it does the F series, but they can charge a damn lot more for the F series. In the end, it's simple economics. The don't sell light trucks in the US because they are trying to maximize profits.

    8. Re:Ford by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Choosing to lower profitable revenue to focus on margin is the sign of a dying company. K-Mart did the same thing 6 months before they declared bankruptcy. Ford is larger, it'll take longer to fail. But they've apparently given up trying to succeed.

    9. Re:Ford by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      They would maximize their profits if they made a few light trucks so that a customer like me would actually buy one. F series being their only offering will not make me buy a larger truck than I need.

    10. Re:Ford by Algae_94 · · Score: 3, Informative

      A lot of it is related to CAFE regulations. The newest CAFE regs are based around a vehicles footprint size - the area enclosed by a rectangle with the wheels as vertices. This is also why full size trucks with regular cabs and short beds aren't really a thing anymore. They need the larger footprint provided by a longer bed.

      Basically larger vehicle footprint = lower acceptable fuel economy. The Rangers and other smaller trucks could easily be redesigned to meet the new standards, but they don't sell in large enough volumes to warrant the R&D expense.

      Funny enough, these midsize trucks sell very well outside of the US. This is why Ford still makes a Ranger for those markets. In the US, you have Toyota Tacomas, Nissan Frontiers, Honda Ridgeline, and maybe next year the Chevy/GM Colorado/Canyon will be brought back.

    11. Re:Ford by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's not what happened, because now there are no trucks which do precisely what the Ranger did, which is to say be a light truck with room for fat people, even if they are tall. So now you need a mid-sized (half-ton) truck to serve that purpose.

      The good news is that the mileage on the half-ton trucks is getting better...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, i've got a taco, too, *but* it *is* a 'fullsize' truck, compared to the old toyotas (or rangers, or any of a handful of 'smal' trucks)...

      had a, well, it had no name, it was just THE toyota pickup, there was no tacoma, tundra, or t100, and it was great, drove the shit out of it for 17 years... when i finally got to replacing it, of course i'm getting a toyo (had a mazda pickup before, too), but they don't make a 'small' truck anymore, i WANTED a small truck, i don't need to pull an 8 horse trailer or haul tractors or whatever...

      bought this one sight unseen (was actually cheaper than a 2-3 year used toyota) and was surprised when i picked up my pick up and it was full size, not a nice compact truck... the pisser is, my damn 17 year old truck got better gas mileage... yeah, those cafe standards sure are onerous... *snort*

      but i do like it, and the dogs like the crew cab...

    13. Re:Ford by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Partly.

      Ford is moving to "world cars". Figure out how to build a car really well and then sell the same car around the world. Honestly it is a great idea.

      The problem is that the replacement for the Ranger is basicly a F-100 - just a hair smaller then the 150. Ford figured it did not make that much sense.

    14. Re:Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's weird that they state the NiMH batteries do not suffer from cold weather. I have experienced the exact opposite. NiMH batteries are terrible in the cold, at least as bad as lead acid and MUCH worse than lithium chemistry batteries. I hate NiMH in the cold, they can't deliver power for shit.

      I generally use LiFe when I need better cold weather performance (it suffers too but not as bad as the others).

    15. Re:Ford by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is also why full size trucks with regular cabs and short beds aren't really a thing anymore. They need the larger footprint provided by a longer bed.

      Actually, what I see more than anything are short-beds with a full 4-door cab, instead of the extended cabs with small suicide doors that were popular for many years (one of which I own). The 4-door cab/short bed is a good compromise between hauling capacity and passenger comfort, and without the parking headaches of a full 8' bed.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    16. Re:Ford by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      True. Regular cabs with any bed are rare, the 4 doors are what people want.

      Looking at the Ford.com build a vehicle page, taking a regular cab truck and wanting a 5 1/2' bed instead of the 6 1/2' bed is close to $8000 more. That's right $8k more for a smaller bed. An economic disincentive for people to get short beds. Chevy's page doesn't even offer the option to build a regular cab with a short bed. They just have regular and long beds. You have to get a 4 door or extended cab for a short bed. I'm sure the reasons are varied for this, but it's clear to see that they are eliminating or drastically reducing the models they offer with shorter wheelbases and therefore higher CAFE standards.

    17. Re:Ford by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I hadn't thought GM offered anything other than the 6' and 8' beds, excepting weird stuff like the Avalanche, but it's been a while since I looked at the market because trucks are just way too expensive now for me to take seriously. I need to do some suspension work on my 1500, and buying a full set of upper and lower control arms + tie rod ends is still going to end up costing me less than a single payment for a new truck.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    18. Re:Ford by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Golly man, how fat are you? The imports are still available in those ranges, and they never seemed too fat-unfrendly. I know a number of heavier people happy in imports (And yes, America is irreparably broken when a Toyota build in TN is an "import" and a Chrysler built in Mexico isn't).

    19. Re:Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sad really, they make a nice basic turbo-diesel in the rest of the world. If Toyota or Ford had offered one in the States I would have bought another in a heartbeat.

      Sure having a "full" sized truck is great until you have to park it, fuel it, pay for it, fix it, try to offroad in it. (Bigger is not always better, especially in the woods)

    20. Re:Ford by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Golly man, how fat are you?

      Golly man, how much of a judgmental asshole are you? Not only that, but you're also a moron. The issue is height. I'm two meters tall, and most of my height is in my trunk.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Ford by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are the one that listed "fat" first and most prominently. I know someone taller than you and wider than you imply, and he had an '80s S-10 without issue. When he went to cars after that, he went to the Caprice Classic. He couldn't physically fit in the driver seat of a 7-series BMW, or most of the other cars/trucks he tried.

    22. Re:Ford by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      But under load they will heat up quickly.

    23. Re:Ford by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, these midsize trucks sell very well outside of the US

      Well, it's all relative. Pick-ups are a purely american thing due to advantageous taxes on them and fashion (any self-respecting redneck needs one). The rest of the world considers them useless:

      • you can't put as many people in them as in a car
      • they don't handle well (a US friend who swears by hers doesn't find anything strange in having to put bags of sand in the back in order to stay on the road on slippery mountain roads)
      • they have very poor aerodynamics thus worse mileage per gallon than a car
      • you can't use them in cities or the stuff you carry gets stolen
      • you can't use them in wet countries or the stuff you carry gets wet
      • Professionals (farmers, construction workers) prefer flatbeds which are easier to load/unload.

      Yeah, you see them in poor desert countries where they carry 20 people and sheep together but in Europe I hardly see one a month. Hey, on your commute, just count the number of pickups that actually carry something...

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    24. Re:Ford by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      shouldn't be a problem if most of your height is in the boot... :o)

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    25. Re:Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B-b-b-buh, I thought regulation made everything better rather than having all sorts of negative unintended consequences! Now I will have to talk to those dirty libertarians again.

    26. Re:Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advantageous taxes on them? WTF are you smoking? Registering a pickup in California is ridiculously expensive compared to passenger vehicles, due to having to register as a commercial vehicle. Add in the additional gas taxes paid over the lifetime of the vehicle due to both mileage and tank capacity and.....what exactly is advantageous about owning a truck when it comes to taxes?

    27. Re:Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can still hear the intake manifold rattling when you attempted acceleration. power ranger was an oxymoron with that truck

    28. Re:Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia says "All leases were terminated in 2003-04, and the vehicles were recalled.". So Ford is the GM of Pick Ups

    29. Re:Ford by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I'm not currently smoking anything: here's what a quick google tuns up

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  2. market by schneidafunk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes! Gotta capture that redneck high-tech environmentally-friendly market.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:market by viperidaenz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      or the red-neck-can't-afford-the-increasing-price-of-gas market.

    2. Re:market by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You probably won't sell them on green-meadows-and-chirping-birds; but (based on the number of insufferable 'our truck uses Butch Power Technology, just like the Hoover Dam, and is made of Steel, just like Big Submarines' advertisements I've endured recently) people who buy trucks like power.

      And, if there is one thing electric motors do very, very, very, well, it is torque. Especially if starting a heavy load from a dead stop, the comparison is hardly fair.

      It probably doesn't hurt that (particularly among vocational users of pickups), more than a few of them are called upon to deliver a fair amount of cargo, than sit there, potentially charging, while the occupants do construction things or such with the cargo.

    3. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live most people haul their household's refuse to a transfer facility a few times a week. I own a pickup truck primarily for this purpose. Hauling trash inside your automobile stinks. I know, I did so for years. All that to say, rednecks are not the target market for an electric pickup truck. But I know some rednecks who would love to get their hands on one. The best mechanics and diy engineers I know are rednecks.

    4. Re:market by confused+one · · Score: 1

      They're out there. There are a couple of hybrid models in the 1/2 ton full size form factor

    5. Re:market by mlts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can see this selling to rednecks. Even they are going solar as opposed to having to deal with the grid.

      A Tesla truck has a lot of nice advantages that would be useful, especially for rednecks:

      1: Max torque at 0 RPM. This can be extremely handy.

      2: No fuel needed, which is a good thing as there is a growing off-grid mentality. Even if the truck trickle charges on a 120VAC, 20A connection via a set of solar panels, it still will be useful. With a larger solar or wind array, a 440VAC charger can be used. Of course, with a redneck, they just sling a generator in the back if worried about range.

      3: There is also a very useful feature of an electric pickup truck. Stick an inverter on the batteries, and you have a very large battery for running electric equipment and no obnoxious generator noise.

      4: There are times when one idles a pickup truck due to needing heat or A/C. Idling an electric car takes up 0 fuel other than what is used for accessories.

      5: Less noise and smell... easier on animals.

    6. Re:market by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      And in many cases recharge with someone else's electricity. Bonus!

    7. Re:market by immaterial · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where the hell did you get half the shit you're arguing against? He said a number of people who use pickups for work use them to haul their equipment and materials to the job site, whereupon they use that stuff in the course of their jobs while the truck sits there. Sounds like every contractor, plumber, electrician, and handyman I've ever met. What exactly was your problem with that concept?

    8. Re:market by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I've definitely known more than a few sole proprietors and small outfits where the single pickup truck delivered both the gear and the guy or guys who were going to be using it. Not going very far after they got out unless one of them made a run for a second load.

      (Also, it's polite of you to ignore the number of 'haha, we'd call it white collar if there were a salary or benefits; because it happens inside an office park or equivalent' shit jobs that you can do in our 'post-industrial service economy' and just accuse me of being a trust-fund asshole...)

    9. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A light saber rack in the back will be standard equipment.

    10. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who uses a pickup truck as a "delivery truck"?

    11. Re:market by geekoid · · Score: 0

      "No fuel needed,..."
      really? It doesn't need a supply of power?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes because tesla is known for its inexpensive vehicles

    13. Re:market by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      6. Place a generator in the bed, and its almost as good as a real truck!

    14. Re:market by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      7. Calvin better not piss on this truck!

    15. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fedex

    16. Re:market by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Electric vehicles in general are insanely expensive. I was watching Top gear (the crappy American version) and the had "Entry Level" electric vehicles on there. The cheapest was well over $30,000. This for a car about the size of Ford Focus, but over twice the cost, and half a ton heavier.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    17. Re:market by Kilo+Kilo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've never seen this as an issue and I live in a rural area with a horrible economy. I don't know where they get the money for it, but every stereotypical redneck around these parts is driving some beater getting 12mpg's or less. And they're always driving. When the nearest everything is a 20-min drive, you think they'd try and combine trips, or stay home more often...nope.

      That said, pickup truck != redneck.

    18. Re:market by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Of course, with a redneck, they just sling a generator in the back if worried about range.

      This is actually a good point -- an electric pickup could operate like a Volt, without the Volt's requirement to always carry around a weighty gasoline engine even on trips where you don't actually need it.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    19. Re:market by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      It probably doesn't hurt that (particularly among vocational users of pickups), more than a few of them are called upon to deliver a fair amount of cargo, than sit there, potentially charging, while the occupants do construction things or such with the cargo.

      That is going to depend on whether or not the job site has a high amp charging station. One of the problems plaguing current EVs is that multiple partial charges shorten battery life. So, unless your EV truck is close to needing a full charge and you actually have the equipment and/or time to give it a full charge, charging it at the worksite could very well be reducing the uselife of the truck.

    20. Re:market by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      I can see this selling to rednecks. Even they are going solar as opposed to having to deal with the grid.

      A Tesla truck has a lot of nice advantages that would be useful, especially for rednecks:

      1: Max torque at 0 RPM. This can be extremely handy.

      2: No fuel needed, which is a good thing as there is a growing off-grid mentality. Even if the truck trickle charges on a 120VAC, 20A connection via a set of solar panels, it still will be useful. With a larger solar or wind array, a 440VAC charger can be used. Of course, with a redneck, they just sling a generator in the back if worried about range.

      3: There is also a very useful feature of an electric pickup truck. Stick an inverter on the batteries, and you have a very large battery for running electric equipment and no obnoxious generator noise.

      4: There are times when one idles a pickup truck due to needing heat or A/C. Idling an electric car takes up 0 fuel other than what is used for accessories.

      5: Less noise and smell... easier on animals.

      I'll give you point 1, although all of that torque, if there is a heavy load comes at the price of really draining the batteries, quite quickly.
      Point 2 isn't feasible. unless some new undiscovered technology is found, all EVs suffer from reduced battery life the more the batteries are recharged. To get maximum battery life, you need recharge them when they are almost drained and bring them to a full charge. You probably aren't going to do this with a solar trickle charger and if you are going to haul around a solar array or a generator in the bed, then the truck won't be much use as a truck.

      Point 3 and 4 are related. Any power used for other purposes is power not available for driving. Sure you can use the batteries to power mega-amps and a super sound system, but you better have power available to recharge the batteries and if you do have power available, then why use the batteries? Likewise running things like the A/C can quickly drain the batteries. Even on a regular car, it is amazing how much running the A/C compressor can put a load on the engine. In physics, work is work and whether powered by a gas motor or batteries, energy needs to be expended to run the AC. At least on a conventional car, the heat is virtually free as it is a waste product, but not so on an EV.

      Point 5 is true, at least for the noise and smell. As for road kill, it probably makes no difference to the animals whether is a conventional or EV that hits them.

    21. Re:market by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      6. Place a generator in the bed, and its almost as good as a real truck!

      Actually, I would place a small diesel generator under the hood and forgo the batteries. An F150 (assuming it would be about that size) has enough space in the current engine compartment for a small generator and electric motor or you could use a motor per wheel design.

      Basically, you would operate like a diesel locomotive, but on a smaller scale, with an alternator powering some type of traction motor. Size keeps this from working on cars, but a full size truck should work quite readily.

      Not totally emmission free, but then neither is all electric, unless it is somehow charged off the grid as current power plants have emmissions, too.

    22. Re:market by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      I wonder why this isn't an option for the Tesla sedan. Put a gas generator out on a trailer, and run an extension cord back to the car, for those times when the range isn't quite enough. If electric cars catch on, there could be some serious money to be made in renting out generator trailers. Most people would only need one a handful of times a year when they're on vacation or travelling outside the city.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    23. Re:market by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I wonder why this isn't an option for the Tesla sedan. Put a gas generator out on a trailer,

      Because people who want to drive a sedan don't want to pull a trailer. But for a pickup it's a complete non-issue because even if you're using the bed, you can still put a generator on one of those hitch-mount cargo platforms.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:market by adolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Point 2 isn't feasible. unless some new undiscovered technology is found, all EVs suffer from reduced battery life the more the batteries are recharged. To get maximum battery life, you need recharge them when they are almost drained and bring them to a full charge.

      This is a myth. Please stop presenting it as fact.

      Indeed, what you describe is the very worst way in which you can treat any rechargeable battery.

    25. Re:market by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I haven't yet watched that episode, but you are definitely not correct (and/or THEY aren't).

      The Nissan Leaf starts out at $28800. (nissanusa.com)

      The Fiat 500e starts at $31800. (Over, but "well over" $30K?) (fiatusa.com)

      Smart electric drive $25000. (www.smart.com)

      So two of them are under (one *well* under) $30K. ..and if you count the evil subsidies, $7500 less in the entire USA, $2500 extra less ($10K total) in CA.

    26. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For an electric vehicle, the price is higher upfront, but the long-term costs are substantially lower. Unless you're somewhere that has insane electrical power prices but low gasoline prices.

    27. Re:market by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      "easier on animals"

      Rednecks may be a little rough around the edges but that's going a bit too far, don't you think?

    28. Re:market by fisted · · Score: 1

      Even if the truck trickle charges on a 120VAC, 20A connection...

      Wow... just...wow.

      ...via a set of solar panels

      wow.

      And +4 Insightful.

    29. Re:market by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      They may have used price as tested, but they were definitely in the $35k - $45k range.
      Ford's home page claims the Ford Focus electric starts at $35,200. The Top Gear show had the Leaf, the 500e and the Focus.
      I also find it interesting that the foreign cars are actually cheaper than the domestic cars.
      It has always fascinated me how the "destination charge" on American cars would often be even higher than the cars that had to travel from the other side of the world, as opposed to the factory a state or two over.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    30. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      look at the business case. Compare fuel costs + payments + insurace on a new 19 MPG F-150 v.s. my 1994 F-150. Hint, what I've saved by dropping collision has already given me enough in the bank to buy another $4K beater. Gas has to get very expensive to be cheaper than payments.

    31. Re:market by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I don't know where they get the money for it, but every stereotypical redneck around these parts is driving some beater getting 12mpg's or less.

      You might be surprised at the mileage some trucks get. I've got a 2002 GMC Sierra 1500 extended cab with 130K miles, and my highway mileage is over 20 mpg. Around town it drops to about 17-18. Not great compared to a compact, but a lot better than most people would assume.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    32. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen some pretty beefy solar systems around these parts. No, they won't run an A/C for long, but with quite a number of batteries and panels going for well under $1/watt (especially if one drives to the solar panel factory and picks them up as opposed to paying delivery costs), one can get a pretty strong array going.

      Of course, in west Texas, where the wind is almost constant, wind power becomes usable, and that definitely can help defray power costs since those have the potential to run 24/7.

    33. Re: market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, the Toyota dealer told my wife the same thing when she got her Prius and even the tesla warns against short recharges because of the shortened battery life. If it' sad myth, I wonder why the manufacturers continue to promote it?

    34. Re:market by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 0

      Point 2 isn't feasible. unless some new undiscovered technology is found, all EVs suffer from reduced battery life the more the batteries are recharged. To get maximum battery life, you need recharge them when they are almost drained and bring them to a full charge.

      This is a myth. Please stop presenting it as fact.

      Indeed, what you describe is the very worst way in which you can treat any rechargeable battery.

      Tesla, itslef states that battery life is dependent on the number of charge/discharge cycles and reccommends against frequent charging when the battery is relatively "full." Their circuitry prevents an overcharge, but does not stop the gradual breakdown at the poles that occur every time current is reversed through the battery. As such running your battery down 20% and recharging 4 times versus running down to 20% and charging once shortens the useful battery life.

      Shortening the life does not mean that the battery will just quit working one day. It will mean that if you could get 160 miles on it new, you might only be getting 110 miles or even less. The battery still works, of course, but its usefulness for powering the vehicle comes sooner than planned.

      It's not just multiple charges. High current quick charges also cause problems for Li+ batteries. They may be convenient at the time, because you don't have to wait overnight to charge the batteries, but you pay in the long run by shorter range and/or earlier replacement.

      Maybe it is all a myth, but given the price of a tesla, I think I would still follow their advice on recharging.

    35. Re:market by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      In the last 10 years gas prices have tripled. This is about a market 5 years in the future.

      They probably get their money from drugs.

    36. Re:market by swillden · · Score: 1

      An F150 (assuming it would be about that size)

      Why would you assume that? An electric truck wouldn't need that enormous engine compartment, so they could just get rid of it.

      Basically, you would operate like a diesel locomotive, but on a smaller scale, with an alternator powering some type of traction motor. Size keeps this from working on cars

      Er, Chevy Volt?

      Not totally emmission free, but then neither is all electric, unless it is somehow charged off the grid as current power plants have emmissions, too.

      Big power plants produce much less pollution per unit of energy produced than small ones.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    37. Re:market by swillden · · Score: 1

      As such running your battery down 20% and recharging 4 times versus running down to 20% and charging once shortens the useful battery life.

      OTOH, running it from 80% down to 60% and recharging back to 80% four times is better. Lithium ion battery life is maximized by keeping the battery state of charge away from either extreme.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    38. Re:market by adolf · · Score: 1

      I parse that as "Please don't go crazy trying to keep the battery at or near "full," because that's a Bad Thing to do. Also, you know: It's a rechargeable battery. Obviously its performance will degrade with charge/discharge cycles. Use it less, and it will last longer."

      Note: They didn't say "please discharge the to near zero before recharging, and then fully charge the battery." That's the myth that I was responding to. It is a myth with its foundation rooted in the much dreaded, and also mythical in normal consumer uses, "memory effect."

      Meanwhile, gradual degradation involves more than cyclical counts -- the peaks and depths of those cycles are also very important factors, as is the rate of charge/discharge, internal temperature, and a slew of other factors that I'm sure the smart people at Tesla already figured out when they carefully omitted the part about making sure to always wait until the battery is near flat before recharging it.

      So, I agree with Tesla: Don't go nuts keeping the battery at 100%. Cycling the battery (ie: actually driving the thing) will reduce battery life. (This is all good advice for about any battery.)

      Why don't you also agree with Tesla?

    39. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to think not making noise is appealing to rednecks.

      My coal rolling stacks will tell you otherwise.

    40. Re:market by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Sure, you just put up an acre of solar panels to generate the electricity. Course, that costs an extra fortune, besides the vehicle.

      But hey, you make decent cash growing marijuana...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    41. Re:market by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I believe the name for this kind of vehicle is called "hybrid". And I don't know why they don't make more of these vehicle, of all sizes.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    42. Re:market by bledri · · Score: 1

      That is going to depend on whether or not the job site has a high amp charging station. One of the problems plaguing current EVs is that multiple partial charges shorten battery life. So, unless your EV truck is close to needing a full charge and you actually have the equipment and/or time to give it a full charge, charging it at the worksite could very well be reducing the uselife of the truck.

      I don't remember the details, but Tesla did a lot of fine tuning of the battery management system that leverages having around 8000 cells. On the Model S they worked with Panasonic to tweak the battery chemistry and internals of the cells. Anyway, according to the Model S Owner's Manual:

      The most important way to preserve the Battery is to LEAVE YOUR MODEL S PLUGGED IN when you’re not using it. This is particularly important if you are not planning to drive your Model S for several weeks. When plugged in, Model S wakes up when needed to automatically maintain a charge level that maximizes the lifetime of the Battery.

      There is no advantage to waiting until the Battery’s level is low before charging. In fact, the Battery performs best when charged regularly.

      The Roadster uses standard Panasonic 18650s and it's manual also suggests leaving the car plugged in. I don't think charging frequently is as much of an issue for Tesla as it is for other EVs.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    43. Re:market by bledri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tesla, itslef states that battery life is dependent on the number of charge/discharge cycles and reccommends against frequent charging when the battery is relatively "full."

      Citation please, because the Model S Owner's Manual says the exact opposite:

      The most important way to preserve the Battery is to LEAVE YOUR MODEL S PLUGGED IN when you’re not using it. This is particularly important if you are not planning to drive your Model S for several weeks. When plugged in, Model S wakes up when needed to automatically maintain a charge level that maximizes the lifetime of the Battery.

      There is no advantage to waiting until the Battery’s level is low before charging. In fact, the Battery performs best when charged regularly. Never allow the Battery to fully discharge

      Maybe the confusing is with the MAX charging option. As part of its battery management, Tesla intentionally does not charge to 100% unless you explicitly request it on the charging menu. People on the forums are still getting over 200 miles on the standard charge. With the MAX charge they're getting over 250 miles and the common practice is to use MAX for road trips. As long as you are using the standard charge settings, you can plug it in all the time and not worry about it killing the battery.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    44. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, now I imagine a stereotypical redneck in an electric pickup powered by a diesel generator placed in the cargo area.

    45. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to suffer from the idea that the battery will run empty almost instantly, while obviously a pickup truck in order to be feasible will have to have a big battery pack. They've stuck a pretty big one on the Tesla Model S, so it doesn't seem that far fetched they'll be able to fit a big one on a car that is to be built 5 years from now.

    46. Re:market by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      should that be "boom boom" instead of "bonus"?

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    47. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idling an electric car takes up 0 fuel other than what is used for accessories.

      Since you clearly missed the second half of the sentence.

    48. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is an option on the BMW i3 - it has an optional motorcycle engine (basically) to extend range.

    49. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the very worst way to treat lead acid and lithium batteries but NiMH batteries absolutely love full cycle charging.

    50. Re: market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will reply on behalf of Exxon:

      Challenge accepted.

    51. Re: market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. Cars can use hitch mount cargo platforms too.

    52. Re:market by Newander · · Score: 1

      Power yes. Fuel no.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    53. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't know where they get the money for it..."

      Theyre rednecks, so its either 1. Unemployment 2. Welfare 3. SS/workers comp for an "on the job injury"

      oh, and Amway

    54. Re:market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought memory effect was only for NiCd and NiMH and not for LiON batteries

    55. Re: market by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Uh. Cars can use hitch mount cargo platforms too.

      Not really. Without a massive, heavy, bulky custom hitch, they can't really carry a generator big enough to make a difference. It would also substantially affect handling.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by neminem · · Score: 1

    Yep, because only Tesla cars ever catch on fire, not regular cars. Oh, wait, there are 17 google results for the extremely specific phrase "ups truck caught on fire", which seem to reference at least a handful of actual occurrences. (Yes, 17 is pretty low, but that is also a very specific phrase. I'm sure I could find more if I searched for variations.)

  4. The main issue with an electric pickup... by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is towing capacity. The tremendous torque would make it no problem for power, but range is a huge issue. Buzzing around town light, no problem. But the traditional use of a full size pickup to haul boats, toy haulers, travel trailers and 5th wheels long distance would probably garner almost nonexistant range due to the wind drag and weight. It's hard enough to make that equation work with diesel and gas - I take a significant hit when hooking up the toy hauler trailer.

    So you would have a choice of a gas vehicle that will do all those things, or an electric vehicle that is probably only good for short hauls or not towing, and then needing still another vehicle to do towing. A hybrid is a better case for that use, as long as the power is there when you need it.

    For all those people that drive them only for a status symbol but don't actually make use of them, then that might be a good market for them.

    I use my 7.3L turbodiesel about once a month to pull heavy things like god intended it to, and the rest of the time I'm in my 30MPG car.

    1. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Animats · · Score: 1

      For all those people that drive them only for a status symbol but don't actually make use of them, then that might be a good market for them.

      A surprisingly large fraction of pickup owners never put anything in the bed of their pickup. Despite this, the Ford Bronco/Chevy Blazer class of vehicle, essentially a pickup with a built-in bed shell, was discontinued years ago in favor of much lighter SUVs built on car-type platforms. (I still own a Ford Bronco. It's basically an 4WD F-250 with a shorter wheelbase. Good for towing a horse trailer. 12 MPG when not towing, so not good for much else.)

    2. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That's a lot less true today then ten years ago.

      The current fashion accessory car is a Prius.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by confused+one · · Score: 1

      The VAST majority of 1/2 ton trucks are sold to people who only use them to drive around town. They might get used to haul a few plants, a couple pieces of landscaping lumber, or a couple bags of mulch every few months. Nothing more than that.

      Around here, they might get used to pull a boat trailer from the house, 20 or 30 miles (at most) to the boat ramp. Usually a couple times a year... I'm not seeing the problem with using the type of system Tesla has been using for this.

    4. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, here in 'Murrica, some states have more pickups than cars, with a staggering majority having no need for a truck, other than to give their music choice some credability.

    5. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by nblender · · Score: 1

      God didn't build your Powerstroke...

      Not everyone who wants a pickup wants to use it to tow a boat or RV. I have had a pickup that only rarely towed things and it wasn't for a status symbol. I used it to haul my Mtn Bike around, or my Skis, or to sleep under the canopy... People use them to haul dogs, tools, parts, lumber, appliances, and to help their friends move.

      People tow with big trucks. An F-150 is not a big tow rig... It's a half ton that might do ok towing your speed boat down to the lake but my wife's Honda Pilot can do that. An F-150 is not going to tow a 3 bedroom dual-hottub with 6 deep friers 5th wheel out to the Mesa.

      He's going after the F-150 market, not the Dodge 5500 market.

    6. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are. Priuses (Priii?) are everywhere in urban environments, but last time I visited texas oil country, every last car in a parking lot at lunch one day was a full size pickup.

    7. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      (I still own a Ford Bronco. It's basically an 4WD F-250 with a shorter wheelbase. Good for towing a horse trailer. 12 MPG when not towing, so not good for much else.)

      My 1992 F250 7.3 with a turbo kit gets 15+ MPG on the freeway with 35" mud tires... And it's you're Bronco's big daddy. Down to the Dana IFS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      Not everyone who wants a pickup wants to use it to tow a boat or RV. I have had a pickup that only rarely towed things and it wasn't for a status symbol. I used it to haul my Mtn Bike around, or my Skis, or to sleep under the canopy... People use them to haul dogs, tools, parts, lumber, appliances, and to help their friends move.

      Even an F-150 is overkill for that kind of thing; the Ranger would have been good enough.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people who drive a pickup around town occasionally will use it for hauling tasks. If you don't drive enough total miles but every once in awhile need to haul, it is not worth it to get a second vehicle just for passenger transport. Unless you drive a lot of passenger miles, the added expense of two vehicles is significant.

      My guess is that they are probably thinking about more of a plug-in hybrid with a large battery, like the volt. That way when you aren't hauling anything, it can just use the battery most of the time, but when you are hauling you have the benefits of gas if you are going further than the mile the batteries would last.

    10. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      In my observations, pickup owners who actually tow or use their truck for anything other than daily driving seem to be a corner case. Though to be fair, people who actually use them more often than "moving, or helping friends move" tend to use them a lot. Those people should probably stick to diesel. The other 99% should be fine with electric.

    11. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where you are. Priuses (Priii?) are everywhere in urban environments, but last time I visited texas oil country, every last car in a parking lot at lunch one day was a full size pickup.

      Even in urban areas. Here in Chicagoland the Priuses are vastly outnumbered by trucks and SUVs that are hardly used for their intended purpose.

    12. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of pickup trucks where I live appear to be used mostly to drive around and burn fuel with a completely empty flatbed. (not to mention that most of them appear to think that their truck has the maneuverability of a go-cart, and drive accordingly, but that's a separate discussion)

    13. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You needed a pickup truck to haul your skis and your mountain bike?

    14. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by mirix · · Score: 1

      This is also true in backwater parts of Canada. Apparently they get bonus points for having the truck jacked so high that the bumper is inline with the windshield of a car, and two points for belching black smoke.

      I think it's likely true everywhere between Vancouver and Toronto.

      Trucks (which includes minivans and SUVs, apparently, not sure who decided on that...) outsell cars 3 to 1 out here in the boondocks. YEEHAW!

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    15. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...is towing capacity. The tremendous torque would make it no problem for power, but range is a huge issue. Buzzing around town light, no problem. But the traditional use of a full size pickup to haul boats, toy haulers, travel trailers and 5th wheels long distance would probably garner almost nonexistant range due to the wind drag and weight.

      People do not buy pickups to haul shit, take them offroad, or even get them dirty. And you should know that by looking around and seeing what I see. Nothing but $30,000+ trucks that blind you with their spotless waxed paint jobs and gleaming chrome that's never seen a single drop of mud.

      I would be surprised to find even 25% of new trucks on the road equipped with a basic trailer hitch. 90% of people buy trucks for two reasons. Safety and social status. That's it. Again, look around you. You'll probably only find 10% of trucks that really look like a truck. The rest are soccer moms that didn't want the minivan, or "men" who drive them around town to try and look like real men, complete with their manicured hands and AAA card. After all, changing a tire is beyond reproach with most these days.

      And it is that affluent, status-seeking spoiled demographic that knows nothing other than "light" hauling in their pointless truck that Tesla is targeting. The other 10% that makes up the hardcore rednecks would give up their guns before they would give up their gas guzzler.

    16. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern "cars" are cheaply built front-wheel drive pieces of crap built on a unibody design. They have plastic trim, rubber fenders, timing "belts" instead of more reliable timing chains, a traverse engine layout that means bad struts might result in a transmission failure, etc. If you want a proper rear-wheel drive automobile with a much safer, more dependable frame on body design, you either have to move into the luxury car segment (BMW, Mercedes) or get a pickup truck.

      There's a reason you see so many old pickup trucks on the road: they still work, after all these years. There are several documented million-mile F-150's on the road still. There are fleets of frame-on-body RWD taxicabs and police cars pushing a half million miles on the original drivetrain. Don't knock people just because they chose reliability (or reliability chose them by sheer luck, and consequently they never needed to get a new vehicle) over whatever you would have chosen (better gas mileage, cars with touchscreen media consoles, etc).

    17. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would have been, but in one of the dumbest decisions they've made since going full derp with the Microsoft SYNC deal, Ford got rid of the Ranger.

    18. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by CaptBubba · · Score: 1

      Same even in the Austin suburbs. King Ranch edition F-150 crew cabs are very common as a daily driver.

    19. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Are you telling people buy cars as status symbols? I can't believe it! The only thing more shocking about your statement is that you think it's limited to 1 social group and 1 type of music. Next time I drive by a Prius blaring Mumford and Sons I'll tell them to go get a pickup like God intended!

    20. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by dale.furno · · Score: 0

      I have an 88 bronco that gets right about 15.

    21. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Not everyone who wants a pickup wants to use it to tow a boat or RV. I have had a pickup that only rarely towed things and it wasn't for a status symbol. I used it to haul my Mtn Bike around, or my Skis, or to sleep under the canopy... People use them to haul dogs, tools, parts, lumber, appliances, and to help their friends move.

      Even an F-150 is overkill for that kind of thing; the Ranger would have been good enough.

      Or a Subaru

    22. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      A hybrid pickup with power takeoff could be an ideal jobsite vehicle, able to power compressors, welding equipment, pumps, tools and other accessories without carrying an expensive genset.

      An EV mini-pickup could do passably, but would be worthless for towing and there's no current (pun of course intended) way around that.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    23. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      But a hybrid system that could tow your horses under Battery + Fuel and then coast on battery the rest of the week would be just perfect for your use. Of course, the thing will cost $45,000 instead of your completely depreciated beater truck. That buys a lot of fuel, even at $4+ per gallon....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    24. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Good. Another reason for you Canadians to invade and annex Alaska. We have the same kind of cars and even drive on the same side of the road.

      Go Canada!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    25. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some of us are too large to sleep in anything smaller than a long-bed pickup truck. I'm two meters tall, there's no Subaru in which I won't be cramped lying down. As well, you certainly can't haul a sheet of plywood in one, but that won't even tax an electric pickup. Some appliances will fit in a Forester, but few will fit in any other Subaru.

      I have a car and a truck though. Both diesel. Car gets 30 mpg free way real-world and has enough room for a mutant like me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 2

      good god man, what are you hauling? railway carriages? that sized engine is almost unheard of where I live. I used to run a 2.4l turbo diesel which would comfortably tow a 3 metric ton load. I would have liked a 3L for those bigger jobs like pulling houses off their foundations.

    27. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Where I live they're mostly used by retirees to occupy the left lane at 5 mph under the speed limit.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    28. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I'm not as tall as you (~10cm less), I cannot comment directly on your comfort. But, I would wager that you could find a Subaru to suit you.

      I've had no problem fitting a full-size refrigerator in the back of my Legacy Outback (the old, small one!). Admittedly, you do have to lay the back seats down, but I always assumed that's why they move....

    29. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by type40 · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the modern American automotive market place it has become a minor sin to have your vehicle feel burdened. I had a friend that "had" to sell his 2007 Chevy 1/2 ton for a 3/4 ton because the half dozen times a year he pulled his boat and trailer the truck "strained". The boat and trailer combo was about 6000 lbs. I had to question him on it because I pulled his boat and trailer a few times with my 1997 Dodge 1/2 ton. I pointed out that my truck (with its less powerful engine, stock brakes, and decade old suspension) pulled it just fine as far as I was concerned. He was basicly upset that when he went to merge onto the highway the truck didn't accelerate like it did unloaded. I pointed out that while 6000 lbs was a substantial portion of his towing capacity it was nowhere near the limits of his truck and he should expect it affect the handling. But he was unswayed so back to the Chevy dealer he went and dropped several thousand dollars on a truck with a V8 turbo diesel. The thing that shocked me though was that among his peers in his upper middle class suburban neighbourhood, his decision was seen a perfectly sensible. They were shocked that he would even attempt to use a 1/2 ton to pull anything more substantial than a pair of jet skis.

      --
      "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
    30. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      You know, I had a Honda CRX that I used to haul my mountain bike around, or my skis, or even a fucking gigantic floor buffer machine rented from Home Depot.

      But my CRX weighed under 2000 lbs and got 35mpg. It was also incredibly fun to drive.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    31. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      While you are spot on for towing a boat or going on a hunting trip, there is still a pretty big market for sport trucks. Ford is getting back into the game to compete with the Dodge SRT-10 and Toyota Tacoma (Formerly X-Runner, now SR). It can be seen as a continuation of their SVT Lightning line of F-150's. While not in as big of numbers as the giant 4x4's that no one seems to use for anything other than daily driver (around here, anyway), I do see a lot of lowered, sport-tuned trucks. If the Model S is any indication of how a Tesla Truck would behave, they may have a pretty easy time catering to the sport truck crowd.

    32. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The weight wouldn't be a problem. Regenerative braking + physics = good recovery of energy expended if you have a place to store it. In other words, you'll suck your battery down when climbing the hill and then recover a great deal on the way back. Great for towing, which is why locomotives use electric motors instead of friction brakes most of the time.

      Basically, wind and tire drag are the main things that drain an EV battery.

    33. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by matfud · · Score: 1

      Someone is still stuck in the sixtites or seventies.
      Most cars will run until a million miles if there are no requirments for saftey, emmissions, or it just falling apart.
      Depending on where you are (the enviroment) some cars fall apart earlier than others.

      I Europe and some US states cars have to be regularly checked for saftey and emmissions so they do not last that long before becomming untenable. Not because they no longer work but they are deemed unsafe due to corrosion.

      Having a seperate frame from the body does not remove that porobelm.

      Front wheel drie is a benifit in many driving situations. (especialy snow and ice)

    34. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by matfud · · Score: 1

      You have to wonder what the point of them is though. In the last few years Landrover has been producing sports models (BMW also) So take a capable 4x4 off road vehicle. Lower its suspension (?). change the gearing for higher road performance(?). Add low bodywork on the front sides and back so that it will barely clear a speed bump(?) . Profit?

      So you end up with an overtuned high performance ex-4x4 that cannot go off road. But it is shiney and still probably better that an F150 with its teeny breaks and pathetic handling.

    35. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by matfud · · Score: 1

      Sorry not landrover (they still make the defender). RangeRover bt it was always a yuppies vehicle.

    36. Re:The main issue with an electric pickup... by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      wow...just wow.

  5. Trucks in Texas by intermodal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think range will be one of the bigger issues in Texas. Many truck owners put on a lot of miles, especially out in rural areas. You don't generally have the option to recharge inplaces like Vernon, TX, Post, TX or Detroit, TX. And I don't see it as likely in the near future. And these will be particularly tough to sell to anyone who uses them for hunting and such activities, since the destinations are frequently remote.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:Trucks in Texas by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of wind energy in Texas looking for something to use it.

      Electric trucks would work well with swap out battery systems. One size fits all.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Trucks in Texas by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I don't know that I see swap-out systems winning over the Texas truck market. Convenience counts to busy people.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:Trucks in Texas by timothy · · Score: 1

      Even ("merely") moving big things in-town would be a great thing for an electric truck; I don't have two cars, which (living in Austin, but having occasional need and desire to drive long distances*) means I have a gas-fueled, fairly efficient car (Subaru Impreza). Even with IKEA furniture, though, that means I can't haul around anything too big ;) An electric *truck* would be really cool IMO as a 2d vehicle, though ... 5 years out, this is really tempting. I wonder where battery tech will be then ... if it meant that the gas car (though at a lower MPG) would be long-distance vehicle, and I could drive around town in an electric truck, I'm OK with that. But especially when a lot of the time on I-35 around here is spent idling in a swamp of exhaust, I'd rather the around-town one be an electric, overall. Trade-offs!

      * And I want to hit more of just such places as you name!

       

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    4. Re:Trucks in Texas by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      This runs under the assumption that the batteries will be roughly the same size as they are in the cars. If pickups had the same size gas tanks as cars, they would run into the same problem, but it turns out that some people came up with the idea to make the gas tanks bigger, thus extending the range. And some people, unhappy with the range provided with the gas tanks built into their trucks, purchase additional tanks that fit in the bed of a truck (and they even pipe those into the regular tanks so they can fill from one tank to the other with a flip of a switch while driving!). Isn't it amazing how people come up with solutions to problems instead of just writing off the whole concept?

      I don't actually know the answer, but I don't see it as such a big issue. Extra batteries. Solar panels on the roof. Fold out solar panels for when you're stopped. Maybe they have a cord with a turbine on the end that you can drop in a river right next to where the deer come for a drink. I think there are plenty of possibilities.

    5. Re:Trucks in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think range will be one of the bigger issues in Texas. Many truck owners put on a lot of miles, especially out in rural areas. You don't generally have the option to recharge inplaces like Vernon, TX, Post, TX or Detroit, TX. And I don't see it as likely in the near future. And these will be particularly tough to sell to anyone who uses them for hunting and such activities, since the destinations are frequently remote.

      People who drive trucks on a road miles and miles either don't mind paying 2x for shitty gas mileage, or are actually using a truck for what it's for, and have to drive that many miles.

      80 - 90% of your light truck demographic does not fall into the latter. They are the status-seeking morons who drive 100 miles a day towing air and wouldn't dare drive anything else.

      And in the future, where you see a McDonalds, you'll find a charging station. Think bigger picture. If Tesla popularity keeps growing, by choice or by force (what, you don't think they have lobbyists too?), retailers themselves will be lining up to license and install superchargers to help drive customer base to their doors and away from competitors.

    6. Re:Trucks in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This won't be an issue in Texas - I hear that it's nearly impossible to buy a Tesla there. Something about big oil, industrial protectionism and creationism I think?

    7. Re:Trucks in Texas by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      They are the status-seeking morons who drive 100 miles a day towing air and wouldn't dare drive anything else.

      Well, great, they can fill that empty bed with two tons of batteries, and have enough range to make it all the way to work and back.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:Trucks in Texas by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      would you be ok with the electric truck costing 120 000?

      maybe not if they get the battery tech cheaper, but just imagine it having 3x the batteries of current teslas for offsetting the weight of the car and the weight of the bulk that it has to move around.

      but we're talking about fleet vehicles here! or elon is talking. running 8 hours + a day.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Trucks in Texas by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I can't really justify a second car, at least not one at the prices a Tesla truck would go for. But I see what you're saying. I also sympathize on the furniture issue. I've certainly had my own IKEA challenges in my diesel Jetta.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    10. Re:Trucks in Texas by intermodal · · Score: 1

      You must not be familiar with how these guys use trucks. Your suggested equipment is almost exclusively a list of things that would be destroyed in a single trip.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    11. Re:Trucks in Texas by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Given your completely made up 80%-90% statistic, you must not be familiar with the Lone Star State.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    12. Re:Trucks in Texas by intermodal · · Score: 1

      It's more a matter of heavy lobbying by the car dealership associations, working to enact laws that protect, mandate even, their status as middlemen.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    13. Re:Trucks in Texas by timothy · · Score: 1

      I plan to keep my Impreza going a nice long time :) It actually does a nice job when you consider what it can hold on the roofrack with some ratcheting straps, and in the nice big hatchback. But it's really easy to spend more in a day on gas than I want to spend in a week ... the opportunity cost of gas vs. an electric (or even just a hybrid) has been taunting me for a few years now. One "around-town pickup" I'm considering is a used Prius; for that matter, I could replace the Subaru with one of those entirely ... A 3-year-old Prius, 3-5 years from now, might be the smartest thing.

       

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    14. Re:Trucks in Texas by intermodal · · Score: 1

      That may be. But my assertion is dependent upon the price tags likely for Tesla's vehicles.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    15. Re:Trucks in Texas by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I don't know that I see swap-out systems winning over the Texas truck market. Convenience counts to busy people.

      You obviously have never had to fill your truck at the pump. Most farmers and ranchers already have their own untaxed fuel storage - or at least did in Texas when we lived on a farm.

      Swapping out an electric battery as Elon Musk suggests, takes about as long as getting gas at most pumps.

      My only concern is that it's a single provider, so we have artificial barriers to true competition.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    16. Re:Trucks in Texas by intermodal · · Score: 1

      That works fine as long as you're at home, but if you're not?

      I will grant that most of the truck-fuelling I have done here in Texas has been fleet vehicles, but the idea of a battery swap being as simple and quick as the fill-ups (even at our own pumps) doesn't add up for me. Even the largest trucks I have dealt with (multi-thousand-gallon fixed liquid tanks) didn't take too terribly long to fuel, and definitely less risky to pump diesel than load and unload huge battery packs.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    17. Re:Trucks in Texas by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Fleet vehicles would have even higher savings from using battery swap electric trucks. Economy of scale. But at least Elon Musk is thinking of the logistics train requirements on the commercial side.

      Some recent tests show that you can even get decent power from large trains using fuel cells powered by wind/solar used to split H2O that are competitive with coal (various Energy science papers)

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  6. Convince the Truck Buyers by Ravaldy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nissan and Honda have tried to break into the truck market for years but the market is not the same as the car market. Truck buyers are hard to sway away from what they know, love and trust. Ford lovers don't buy Dodge and vice versa.

    With electric engines torque won't be a problem but will reliability and durability be issues?

    If Tesla succeeds at making a durable truck that gets at least 300 - 400 miles with a decent load capacity, a price tag to compete and more power, I can see some changing their preferred brand.

    1. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by confused+one · · Score: 1

      reliability and durability should be higher with electric. Fewer moving parts. For what it's worth, Nissan and Toyota own the mid-size truck market.

    2. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by nblender · · Score: 2

      Disagree. Honda tried to make a truck for the antiquing market... But Toyota did mighty fine in the mid-size pickup market and they're doing great with the Tundra market... Around here (Alberta), the Tundra sems to be the pickup for the successful redneck vs. the Ford/Dodge/Chevy. I predict Nissan will do great now that it has licensed the Cummins for 2015 (and Dodge is going Italian diesel)...

    3. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For what trucks are used for, there's no downside to electric motors; not a one. What there are significant downsides with are batteries; same old song. First fellow smart enough to build trucks like Diesel-Electric trains will have that market sewn up in a flash.

    4. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by 1000101 · · Score: 1

      Nissan has a long way to go to catch up in truck sales. http://wap.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3022-autosales.html

    5. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a price tag to compete

      This is Tesla we're talking about, their price will be competitive with other ultra high end luxury trucks if there are any.

    6. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Spectre · · Score: 1

      a price tag to compete

      This is Tesla we're talking about, their price will be competitive with other ultra high end luxury trucks if there are any.

      2014 Chevy Silverado "High Country", MSRP $44,000 (from Chevy's web site).
      That might even be reasonable to get a comparable price point from a Tesla truck ...

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    7. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by AJWM · · Score: 2

      will be competitive with other ultra high end luxury trucks if there are any.

      There are. For one example, Cadillac makes a pickup. (Well, some may argue that that's only "high end", not "ultra high end".)

      --
      -- Alastair
    8. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by lgw · · Score: 1

      First fellow smart enough to build trucks like Diesel-Electric trains will have that market sewn up in a flash.

      I've long been mystified why no one sells these. Pure electric for short trips, but the range/refuel advantages of diesel where needed (and simpler than the "parallel hybrid" cars you see, as the diesel engine is only a generator).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nissan and Honda have tried to break into the truck market for years but the market is not the same as the car market. Truck buyers are hard to sway away from what they know, love and trust. Ford lovers don't buy Dodge and vice versa.

      My family has been a Ford family for a few decades now. This summer my '97 F150 blew a head gasket at 150k miles. Turns out its a common problem with the Windsor engine. My trusted local mechanic refused to replace the gasket because the motors are such crap and he didn't want to be responsible for it. Junk yard motors for the truck are tremendously (2-3x that of a Toyota pickup engine) expensive because so many people need to replace their blown motors. The KBB private party value for the truck was $4500 but if you look on Craigslist people are asking $3000. A junk yard offered me $500 for the truck and I was happy to get it.

      We're no longer a Ford family.

    10. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      reliability and durability should be higher with electric. Fewer moving parts. For what it's worth, Nissan and Toyota own the mid-size truck market.

      If you treat the engine as a single unit in a vehicle, how many more moving parts are there in a standard vehicle? Both have suspensions and steering boxes and A/C compressors, etc. Yes, the engine has more moving parts internally, but really, for modern cars, that reliability is not an issue.

      As for Nissan and Toyota owning the mid size truck market, well no shit! The others abandoned the market a long time ago.

    11. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Nissan make excellent mini-trucks, but truck buyers tend to buy American brands.

      EVs will be useless for many pickup roles such as trailer towing, service trucks, wreckers, and so forth.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      One problem in the boonies (where this sort of thing really makes sense) is repair. Every small town in the US has a shop that can repair the vast majority of ICE powered vehicles. For some time, repair of electrics is going to be the province of dealers and perhaps larger shops. It's primarily the reason that I wouldn't get an hybrid just yet - my local mechanic won't touch them. Not enough volume to make it worthwhile to buy the needed tools and to send his mechanics to school.

      Chicken and egg for a while longer.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nissan and Toyota don't make mid-size trucks. They finally started making half-ton trucks, but they abandoned the mid-size truck market as well and only make normal-sized trucks and itty bitty trucks. And that's why the disappearance of the Ranger, the last mid-size truck, is so frustrating.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      For some time, repair of electrics is going to be the province of dealers and perhaps larger shops

      OTOH, one of the (purported) advantages of an electric car is that (outside of replacing tires, and, after 8-12 years, the battery) there shouldn't be much in it that needs repair.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    15. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have quite a bit better range advantage that pure diesel. Weight should be about the same as you trade ICE size for a buffer battery. The drivetrain layout is simpler and decoupled, which solves a number of longstanding issues with 4wd. For common fleet/industrial uses you've already got it specialized for electrical generation for various workloads, but with a much smaller displacement engine. Ditto you've got greater freedom in layout for ptos to drive compressors and other common on-site truck-mounted tooling. And as it's more modular by design (less coupling) it goes straight into panel vans, roach coaches, and the god awful things that UPS shuttles around in.

    16. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1994 F-150, 480,000 miles and change. I change the oil every 3000 miles, transmission and differential every 100,000 but that's it to the powertrain. What, exactly, is more reliable or durable about a battery pack that will most certainly wear out?

    17. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised nobody has been serious about taking similar tech to the big rigs. Diesel electric has been proven as applied to freight rail, so all its advantages seem very applicable to trucking. Much better driveline distribution when controlled electronically, gives all the benefit of engine braking with none of the associated noise. And whatever you don't dump as heat in some resistor bank can obviously be recovered for later. With big enough batteries to supplement the diesel generator it would also cut down a lot of pollution in stop-and-go city driving, as the diesel could be run at a much more efficient constant rate and only be needed for just the base load if not shut off completely in situations where a normal truck would be stopped and idling.

      Well maybe if Tesla Motors can do it with small trucks, somebody working with the big ones will catch on.

    18. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Valcrus · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. My 50k F150 won't be replaced by a 100k+ electric car. I can tow for 300-400 miles fill my tank and go for another 300-400 miles. Until they get Mileage, Cost, and Recharge time under control they aren't going to be taking any major part of any truck business. Even with cars they have a very small percentage of ownership and most of those are just people that want to go "Look at the toy I got".

    19. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the Tacoma not mid-sized? Its not any itty-bittier than the Ranger was.

    20. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      2014 Chevy Silverado "High Country", MSRP $44,000 (from Chevy's web site).
      That might even be reasonable to get a comparable price point from a Tesla truck ...

      Yes. Given the price, and the number of people who mostly use their truck to carry crap around town, it's probably one of the few sane markets for electric vehicles.

    21. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Nissan and Honda have tried to break into the truck market for years but the market is not the same as the car market.

      Umm... I just read that Nissan is the #2 small-truck manufacturer in the US.

      If Tesla succeeds at making a durable truck that gets at least 300 - 400 miles with a decent load capacity, a price tag to compete and more power, I can see some changing their preferred brand.

      Yeah, and if they come up with magic fairy dust that'll let us fly to our destinations, they'll do just fine...

      Are you SERIOUS? A 400 mile range electric pickup, with a price-tag comparable to current conventional pickups? Did you want a pony with that?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by loosescrews · · Score: 1
      According to Wikipedia, you are backwards:

      In recent years, Ranger's competitors, from the Nissan Frontier to the Toyota Tacoma have been redesigned and enlarged towards the mid-size market, leaving the Ranger the only truck in the US compact market segment.

    23. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Politburo · · Score: 1

      There's not much in the way of tools.. really only a Techstream which many already have since they are used for all Toyota/Scion/Lexus. And for most things you don't even need that, a generic OBDII (and sometimes a multimeter) will do. Most of the routine maintenance is no different than a conventional vehicle.

    24. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Nissan and Honda have tried to break into the truck market for years but the market is not the same as the car market. Truck buyers are hard to sway away from what they know, love and trust. Ford lovers don't buy Dodge and vice versa.

      With electric engines torque won't be a problem but will reliability and durability be issues?

      If Tesla succeeds at making a durable truck that gets at least 300 - 400 miles with a decent load capacity, a price tag to compete and more power, I can see some changing their preferred brand.

      The Honda Ridgeline is kind of a funny offering. You an improvement of 1-2mpg over the F-150. In every other measurable way, the F-150 is superior. Size, range, cost, operation cost, etc etc. I would never buy a truck anyway, but the Ridgeline isn't very compeditive in my eyes. And I am usually lean towards Japanese manufacturers.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    25. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by dj245 · · Score: 2

      One problem in the boonies (where this sort of thing really makes sense) is repair. Every small town in the US has a shop that can repair the vast majority of ICE powered vehicles. For some time, repair of electrics is going to be the province of dealers and perhaps larger shops. It's primarily the reason that I wouldn't get an hybrid just yet - my local mechanic won't touch them. Not enough volume to make it worthwhile to buy the needed tools and to send his mechanics to school.

      Chicken and egg for a while longer.

      I can easily see electricians muscling into this market. Maybe they should be partnering with auto shops. Auto shops already subcontract out for certain things, like body work or paint. Adding another subcontractor wouldn't be that earth-shattering.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    26. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well, OTOH that likely means when anything goes wrong with the engine you need an entire new engine. (There was a day when a mechanic would actually repair a busted alternator or starter, instead of part swapping, but that was before I was born.) Wonder how long that lasts.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    27. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Well, OTOH that likely means when anything goes wrong with the engine you need an entire new engine

      Agreed -- a whole new electric motor, to be exact. So hopefully the electric motors will be durable.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    28. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by matfud · · Score: 1

      Transmission and diff every 100,000 miles? thats a bit low ball isn't it? Most of those should last 150,000 to 250,000 miles. And then they should olny need a strp down and service.
      Unless you are pulling up tree stumps every day. Or are F150s a bit flakey?

    29. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by matfud · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately not there yet. Trucks like the RangerEV ? had a combined electric motor and diff in one (plus water cooling) so if it failed it could be very expensive. Other E vehicles do not have that same system and may be much less prone to very expensive failures. But then It is probably less expensive then a clutch or diff failing. (or even a drve shaft as I found out on me old car)

    30. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Funny how you say that too. I was watching a snippet about the F-150. It has the most sold trucks for the last 36 years in the USA and last 47 years in Canada. I don't know if the numbers are true but if they are that's a heck of a statement.

    31. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I wasn't clear in my statement. I meant to say that it should be the long therm target (say 10 years). I realize that early on they cannot achieve this but in the long run there is no reason they can't. Otherwise it just won't matter that they released it in the first place. So at first you'll get the fanatics to buy it and eventually cost will come down (you hope) and real competition will start.

    32. Re:Convince the Truck Buyers by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      My father owned one. As much as he loved it when he first got it, it didn't take him 120 000 km to replace it.

  7. Hard market to break into by confused+one · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Several manufacturers have gotten out of the U.S. small truck market recently. Ford and Dodge both dropped their small and mid-size offerings due to falling sales in the small truck arena. It's a hard market to break into and there's a lot of brand loyalty among the consumers.

    1. Re:Hard market to break into by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A large factor in the derth of small pickups is the chicken tax, the stupidest protectionist law still on the books.

    2. Re:Hard market to break into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the American-made ones aren't around anymore. Ford discontinued the Ranger, Dodge got rid of the Dakota, the made-in-Texas Toyota Tacoma has increased in size to what an F-150 used to be. Chevrolet is the only one in the market.

      They just don't sell, chicken tax or no.

    3. Re:Hard market to break into by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Small pickups are light trucks, but light trucks are not limited to small pickups. In other words, if the tariff was "a large factor," one would expect to see correlation in vans, minivans, SUVs, and other pickup truck sales.

    4. Re:Hard market to break into by Tailhook · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So the tax has been in place for 48 years but only recently caused manufacturers to drop these product lines....?

      That doesn't actually make sense. Here is something that does;

      Light trucks are now tallied as cars in the fleet average for the purposes of CAFE fuel economy regulation. Manufacturers can't make historical quantities of these vehicles because they hurt they average too much, so they've reduced production. Naturally, prices climb due to lack of supply.

      Light trunks are low margin products for budget conscience buyers, so as prices climb buyers vanish, some heading to used car lots. Manufacturers can see the writing on the wall for light trunks and they're pulling out.

      "Because of the new CAFE guidelines, the most fuel-efficient segment for pickup trucks, the small ones, aren’t going to be available in the U.S. market."
      — John Krafcik, president and chief executive officer of Hyundai Motor America

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    5. Re:Hard market to break into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "light trucks" article indicates that people movers (for less than 12 people) don't count. The "chicken tax" article indicates that (a) stuff built in the US doesn't count at all for the tariff, and (b) the _customs_ definition of a light truck says that cargo doesn't need back windows, back seats, or rear seat belts, so the presence of those automatically classes a vehicle as a people-mover, handling SUVs and minivans handily. As for vans, aside from the occasional Sprinter, all the vans I see on the road are Fords.

    6. Re:Hard market to break into by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Light trucks are also dying in part because stow-n-go seating is now so common in mini-vans. When you can fold away the rear seat and load in a dozen bags of compost, or fold down both seats and get a sheet of plywood in... while still having a vehicle that can haul the family around, a puppy truck becomes a lot less attractive. (Note that sales of light trucks have been dropping for more than a decade - there's more to it than recent changes to CAFE.)

    7. Re:Hard market to break into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Back when I got my pickup (c. 2001) I looked at the range of options available, and a small V6 pickup got 16MPG and the 5.7L V8 I wound up getting got 16MPG. The only reason to get the small truck was for easier parking.

      Since the one I got can haul twice as much, for large loads that need moving the effective MPG is doubled. Also, having that power is nice for plowing and pulling stumps. It's no F350 diesel, but still glad I got the bigger one.

      These days an F350 diesel can get better mileage (and economy) than my half-ton, which is less than 20 years old. Tesla's target is a moving one.

    8. Re:Hard market to break into by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Light trucks are also dying in part because stow-n-go seating is now so common in mini-vans.

      Stowable seating was common in minivans two decades ago, too... That's not a recent change, and can't account for recent falling sales of small pickups.

      Personally, I'm not sure why minivans haven't died yet. Small and light SUVs can be a fairly small step away from a mini-van, while being much more capable, and less despised.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Hard market to break into by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Stowable seating was common in minivans two decades ago, too...

      Not on this planet.

      can't account for recent falling sales of small pickups.

      On this planet, falling sales aren't recent - they go back over a decade.

    10. Re:Hard market to break into by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The Honda Odyssey came out in 1995. Others followed suit quickly, though there have been a few holdouts.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Hard market to break into by Politburo · · Score: 1

      1st gen Odyssey you still had to haul the 2nd row seats out. In fact even today the Odyssey doesn't have 2nd row stowable seats.

    12. Re:Hard market to break into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's another reason (this may just be the company line of the person I heard it from, but makes sense) ...
      - Given the complexity of a modern vehicle and modern vehicle company, raw materials are a surprisingly small part of the cost. Whether your vehicle is large, small or mid-size, it needs the same number of parts, the same assembly, the same overhead, so most of the costs are the same. For example, if a full sized truck is only $1,000 more than mid-sized, most people will spend that to get the much larger vehicle. Who would buy the smaller, less useful one, if the prices are very similar?

    13. Re:Hard market to break into by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Chevrolet/GMC dropped the S-10/Sonoma after 2003 and replaced it with a pickup 500 pounds heavier and I assume slightly larger to avoid CAFE restrictions.

  8. Electric trucks don't solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pickups might be the only place gasoline[or truly diesel] makes sense. We just have to stop buying a pickup truck to only actually use it 30% or less of the time.

    Trucks would make so much more sense as rentals rather than owning them for most truck owners. If you have a boat you use a hand full of times a year, you don't need to own a truck. If you go hunting and bring ATV's for two months out of the year...you don't need to own a truck.

    If you own a labor business or work on a farm, or whatever, yes it makes a lot of sense to own a truck.

    The over whelming population of people who are paying notes[they don't own shit] on huge trucks don't need them. The only purpose they generally serve is false reassurance of masculinity and to further escalate the American 'Canyonero' phenomenon.

    1. Re:Electric trucks don't solve the problem by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      It's not up to you to decide who does and does not need a truck.

    2. Re:Electric trucks don't solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would never tell you or anyone else to give up their four wheeled cod piece.

      But sooner or later the economics and common sense prevail. It makes sense to get ahead of it.

    3. Re:Electric trucks don't solve the problem by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      If you've never driven an industrial electric turbine car, you've never drag raced.

      Now that is acceleration!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Electric trucks don't solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But sooner or later the economics and common sense prevail.

      Perhaps on your planet, but not here on earth.

      The really smart people are breeding less, and idiots are breeding like rabbits.
      So the quaint notion that "common sense" will prevail doesn't correlate to what
      can be seen in the real world. Gas in many parts of the US still sells for close to
      $4.00 per US gallon, and the masses continue to insist on driving huge inefficient
      vehicles. Sure, there are a few outliers who bought a Prius or a TDi, but the masses
      still consume petroleum like it was 1965.

      ;

    5. Re:Electric trucks don't solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would never tell you or anyone else to give up their four wheeled cod piece.

      Liar. You're doing just that when you call it a "four wheeled cod piece", which is an absolutely ignorant and unwarranted assumption about their reason for owning a truck. It's bigotry, plain and simple.

      And no, I don't own a truck myself, and yes, that is what you were going to say.

    6. Re:Electric trucks don't solve the problem by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      You mean like This? I would love to have that motor in my Camaro.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  9. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by Ravaldy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess we should have stopped taking flights in Boeing air planes after they had electrical fire issues right?

    If everybody was as negative as you are towards progress we would still be trying to figure out how to contain fire.

  10. Yawn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure you could be less interesting if you really tried, but I'm not sure how.

    1. Re:Yawn. by JoeyRox · · Score: 1, Troll

      I guess I'm just tired of seeing thinly-velied advertisements for Tesla's stock on /. At least the pink-sheet stock emails I received in the 90's had some interesting stories behind them, and even when they didn't I could route them to my junk folder instead of having to see them on the front page of /.

    2. Re:Yawn. by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      Ah, so you hate Tesla or Slashdot so much that you'll say incorrect negative things just to make you feel better. The other solution is to just not read the ones you don't like. Instead, you read them, and comment on them (multiple times) increasing their popularity and increasing the chance they return. That's not smart. But you've not said anything that would lead anyone to think otherwise.

    3. Re:Yawn. by JoeyRox · · Score: 0

      Can't disagree with you but what exactly was incorrect in what I said? If I ship a package that is lost to a fire in transit while in UPS/FedEx custody then it needs to be insured by me in order to indemnify against loss. The UPS driver going on the news and saying how much he loves his Tesla-powered UPS truck while it burns in the background isn't going to bring my package back.

    4. Re:Yawn. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You don't need insurance to collect for damages, UPS or otherwise, and the lie is the implication that the chances of fire are greater with an EV than gas/diesel they use now. The statistics I've seen on it indicate that an EV gets more news coverage, giving false impressions to people that rely on the news to gauge the likelihood of something occurring, but that the actual risk of fire is smaller in an EV than "regular" auto.

    5. Re:Yawn. by Smauler · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm just tired of seeing thinly-velied advertisements for Tesla's stock on /.

      You may be tired of it, I'm not. I enjoy seeing innovative companies doing well, I like hearing about new stuff, and I don't care about the stock exchange.

      I doubt I'll ever buy an electric car, because I always buy cheap and sell (or scrap) cheap. My current car (a DC2 Integra type R) cost 5% of a new Tesla.

    6. Re:Yawn. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      some people are just trollish prats and some are failed comedians. there's no point responding to them

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    7. Re:Yawn. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      i agree, the more innovation the better. once all trucks, buses etc are electric, the air might smell better in the cities and we'd all spend less time picking the dirty particulates out of our noses

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    8. Re:Yawn. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are talking about yourself again.

  11. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    You silly optimist. You'd just get "Delivery Status: Exception" and have to hammer customer support for details, unless you've shelled out for Heroic Platinum NSA Tracking, in which case they might have a more detailed error code.

  12. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by confused+one · · Score: 1

    UPS and FedEX both already have hybrid trucks in use in a handful of places.

  13. Or as it will be known... by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 0

    The Electric FIRE Truck

  14. Never be popular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trucks need to be tough and able to take abuse. Tesla has shown pretty clear their cars won't take abuse.

    Actual WORK gets done with trucks. Multiple ton use. Hauling, towing, pulling, off road use.

    The torque electric provides would be very nice. The longevity not so much.
    And if you have a battery pack large enough to provide the duration of use you'd need for a truck... Well there's your weight limit right there.
    Plus most of the people who work out of their trucks. Run them for decades. A big expensive battery replacement rules that out as well.

    You might sell a few to the yuppies who pretend they 'work' for a living. But i think the SUV market has them covered pretty well already.

    1. Re:Never be popular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Locomotives are electric[diesel-electric] and I think they work plenty hard. Stop regurgitating American truck commercials. Going to Walmart and McDonalds is not hard.

    2. Re:Never be popular. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Locomotives are turbine-electric and diesel-electric HYBRIDS.

      A hybrid truck could be a terrific jobsite vehicle, and some companies have done conversions, but Tesla aren't proposing a hybrid.

      [quote]
        Stop regurgitating American truck commercials. Going to Walmart and McDonalds is not hard.
      [/quote]
      Millions of us in Flyover Country use our trucks as tools, not suburban dick jewelry. I like the relative simplicity of PHEVs, but none exist which are suitable replacements for even an F-150-sized truck. Good luck putting a 1300lb welder in the back of a Tesla EV pickup and going any serious distance without recharging.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Never be popular. by tygt · · Score: 1

      And if you have a battery pack large enough to provide the duration of use you'd need for a truck... Well there's your weight limit right there.

      Right, because there's nothing heavy in the gas/diesel truck, is there.

      Oh, wait... a diesel engine weighs over1,000 pounds - not counting accessories?

      I'm sure replacing that would leave a bit of room in the budget for batteries....

    4. Re:Never be popular. by bigwheel · · Score: 2

      A Ford F-150 truck with Ecoboost weighs 4,935 pounds. A Tesla S weighs 4,647. Right about the same weight.

      The F-150 is a full-size truck with a heavy chassis, and a 11,300 pound towing capacity. A Tesla S is a little sedan. By the time the Tesla S is beefed up to truck capability, it is going to weigh a lot more than the Tesla sedan, and also a lot more than the F-150.

      The F-150 pays fuel taxes which are used for road maintenance. The much heavier Tesla will pay zero. Plus, the F-150 owner will help pay for the Tesla's rebate.

    5. Re:Never be popular. by dj245 · · Score: 2

      Locomotives are turbine-electric and diesel-electric HYBRIDS.

      They are not. They are diesel-electric (not hybrids). And outside of some historical experiments, they never incorporate turbines*. In this application, electric power is used since mechanical transmissions are not practical or cost effective. Electric power gives more control and torque at low speeds. There is no battery storage of power, so they are not "hybrids". Similar technology is used in some marine applications for reasons of controllability, eliminating a mechanical transmission, and flexibility.

      *a turbocharger is arguably a kind of turbine, but it is a power augmentation device, not a power producing one.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    6. Re:Never be popular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This kind of power transmission is used on railways by diesel electric locomotives and diesel electric multiple units, as electric motors are able to supply full torque at 0 RPM. Diesel-electric systems are also used in submarines and surface ships and some land vehicles.

      In some high-efficiency applications, electrical energy may be stored in rechargeable batteries, in which case these vehicles can be considered as a class of hybrid electric vehicle.

    7. Re:Never be popular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you seem to be missing is that those locomotives are *fully* electric-driven. Any other 'power system' in the thing is used to produce *electricity* which actually runs the electric motors that run the thing.

  15. Firetruck? by alta · · Score: 0

    Does it carry it's own fire retardant? ;)

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:Firetruck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you use apostrophes incorrectly?

  16. This should be good in Alberta as well by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Alberta is the Texas of Canada, and there's cheap hydro power from BC to power them.

    In fact, anywhere that electricity comes from cheaper solar, wind, or hydroelectric sources, given how people actually use their trucks, an electric truck makes sense.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  17. Squandered Research by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 4, Informative

    Like GM, Ford also squandered its early technology in the EV area.

    Ford Ranger EV, 1,500 produced, model years 1998–2002.
    GM EV1, 1117 produced, model years 1996–1999. They also had the small truck S-10 EV variant.
    Toyota RAV4 EV was produced from 1997–2003, and is now back in production with Tesla.

    Is anyone surprised that a Japanese company had longer foresight than the American ones? Thank you Wall Street.

    1. Re:Squandered Research by Solandri · · Score: 1

      There really isn't much technology in an EV to "squander" a lead. It's just an electric motor, a battery, and a switch between the two to flip between charging vs. operating. Any electric golf cart or even a RC kid's toy has the same thing.

      The only state of the art technology in an EV is the battery. And battery development is currently being driven by the laptop/tablet/phone industry, not EVs. So even if the automakers had continued to produce those EVs from the 1990s (predominantly lead-acid or NiMH battery based), they wouldn't have been much better off than they are today where most of the new batteries are lithium-based.

  18. America's best-selling Ford F-Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ford's F-Series is Americas best selling for a few reasons:
    1. It's cheap.
    2. It's a full sized pickup.
    3. It's durable enough.
    4. It's cheap.
    5. Do you hear, Elon? It's cheap.

    Ford has already produced an electric pickup. It doesn't sell well! It doesn't sell well because it isn't cheap. Ford's best selling vehicles are not fuel efficient at all.

  19. As usual the British did this 50 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suffice to say, they dont use them anymore
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk_float

    1. Re:As usual the British did this 50 years ago by danknight48 · · Score: 1

      We (the uk) still have these doing their rounds.
      The main reason they have declined is due to supermarkets obtaining the customer sales. Nothing to do with how their powered.

  20. Sure, I'd Buy One by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. Presuming it has at least a 1500 lb weight rating, can tow 30,000 lbs, all while maintaining a range of 250+ miles. Oh, and I'll need to be able to go from 0% - 100% charge in less than 30 minutes (preferably less than 5).

    In rural Missouri.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Sure, I'd Buy One by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Solution: Diesel-Electric - just like they put in trains.

    2. Re:Sure, I'd Buy One by DoubleJ1024 · · Score: 1

      I would love to have a diesel-electric truck, I am going through the process of putting a re-manufactured motor in my F-150 right now as the prices for used trucks is crazy expensive. I found a newer model truck with much higher mileage going for more than 4 times what my truck is worth, so it makes sense to replace the motor in mine. The diesel-electric would give me the range and power I want/need to pull my small trailer and be RELIABLE under all situations. I don't think the world is quite ready for an all electric pick up truck, the rednecks and wanna-be's will pitch a fit and not purchase them.

    3. Re:Sure, I'd Buy One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are probably not the target demo.

      But I know at least 5 engineers who drive their damn Nissan Titans and F-150s to work and back every day (and as far as I can tell have never had anything in the bed).

    4. Re:Sure, I'd Buy One by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Diesel-Electric transmissions are very efficient, but they're also not particularly responsive. They work for trains because trains don't have to keep stopping and starting, are slow to move anyway (for a US style feels-like-a-mile-long freight train you'd be surprised how long it takes before the last car starts to move after the locomotive does) and typically, outside of depots, trains in motion are kept around a mile apart.

      Truck drivers aren't going to be happy with a truck that moves like a train locomotive. Nor will anyone behind them at a traffic signal that just turned green ;-)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  21. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by JoeyRox · · Score: 0

    I stopped flying in 737's until Boeing implemented a workaround for the hardover rudder problem that caused 737's to yaw on their side and fly straight into the ground.

  22. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by binarylarry · · Score: 1

    We called that the "Whoopsie" on the Boeing 737 engineering team.

    That was a fun problem to debug.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  23. Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This technology has been used in guitars for at least 50 years now. I'm sure you'd think electronic pickups is something really cool to use in cars at first, but I guarantee, at most it'll just another short lived craze. Don't understand what the point is really of having cooler sounding cars

  24. Teslas are toys for those with money to waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people use trucks for work, five or six days a week, in
    all kinds of weather and road conditions. For many truck owners
    a truck is their only vehicle, and they need to be able to do anything
    and everything with that truck. Stuff like range restrictions or a vehicle
    catching fire if it runs over a sharp rock on a job site won't fly for these
    users.

    Frankly, converting to natural gas fuel makes a LOT more sense than
    buying one of Musk's scam products. /.

  25. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    They had a workaround before the next 737 flew after the problem was isolated. You couldn't have stopped flying in that period because it would have been impossible to do so. That, and what would you do if you booked a flight on an airbus that, when you went to the gate, noticed that it was a 737? walk out and lose thousands of dollars for a flight that had roughly the same chance of arriving safely at the other end as the airbus that was scheduled?

    From the time it was isolate to when there was a mechanical fix, there were zero crashes. Training fixed the issue. How to fly when your plane is broken is most of the training pilots get. Flying when everything is working is boring.

  26. Re:Locomotives are electric[diesel-electric] by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 2

    Actually, I was thinking that instead of full-on electric, train-based diesel-electric hybrid technology would make a lot of sense. I'm sure having something like the pulling power and range of a train would be all kinds of awesome in a pickup.

  27. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    If it doesn't have ion thrusters for towing, I will be thoroughly disappointed. Yes, they basically only work in a vacuum but still, they'd look really cool!

    1. Re:I have an idea by erice · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't have ion thrusters for towing, I will be thoroughly disappointed. Yes, they basically only work in a vacuum but still, they'd look really cool!

      I'm not aware of a reason why ion thrusters would require vacuum but they are low thrust. Zero to sixty in nine days might not be a selling point. Pulling a trailler up hill filled with anything denser than balloons might be a problem too.

  28. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But there were 2 crashes before the "isolation".... I wouldn't want to trust that they'd fix it right the first time, either.

  29. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    I stopped flying before they had identified the cause. But they knew well before arriving at root cause that the problem was a rudder hardover - they just couldn't figure out the conditions which led to it. And training didn't fix the issue perse - it only made it less likely to lead to a crash since it added some margin to the approach speed (more headroom above rudder cross over velocity).

  30. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by ebh · · Score: 1

    I stopped flying once I proved that heavier-than-air flight is impossible.

  31. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but your accurate information comport with the premise of my joke so I have to dismiss it out of hand.

  32. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    I stopped flying in 737's until Boeing implemented a workaround for the hardover rudder problem that caused 737's to yaw on their side and fly straight into the ground.

    Yes, hopefully you switched to the Airbus competitor to the 737 which had no problems with the rudder, just an issue with the screw sheering off on the elevator.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  33. Might an electric pickup be too heavy? by erice · · Score: 1

    The Tesla Model S weighs more an 1000 pounds more than similar gas powered vehicles. Pickups (well, the ones that are actually used for work) are often driven on dirt. Even if it just an unfinished driveway at a work site rather than a field, it can still be muddy. The heavier the vehicle on a given set of tires, the more you sink and are likely to get stuck. You get work around this with bigger tires or more tires but that increases costs and reduces efficiency. Reducing efficiency means you carry even more expensive and heavy batteries.

    1. Re:Might an electric pickup be too heavy? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of pickups never leave the tarmac. Even fewer leave dirt roads. The ones that do are often stuffed to the gills with (heavy) off-road things. So, I'm not sure how strong your argument really is. Heavy = poorer power economy and less payload capacity. The latter may be a significant issue - the manufacturer will have to balance payload with range. We'll undoubtedly see how that falls out.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  34. So what truck does all things for all people? by Uberbah · · Score: 2

    Many people use trucks for work, five or six days a week, in all kinds of weather and road conditions.

    Do you also look down your nose at people who buy two-door F150's because they can't seat 5 passengers or tow 18,000 lbs? It's about buying what fits your needs, and not everyone needs a truck for 300 miles a day, 6 days a week, anymore than everyone needs a F450 Super Duty Crew Cab.

    /statingtheobvious

  35. Maybe they could market it as a Fire Truck by Running+Bear · · Score: 0

    I'm sure a sexy red paint job would help it sell. But I'd be afraid that it would catch fire and burn up. Considering the beating that my truck takes now and the recent history of Tesla considering battery fires and damage. The insurance on it would be as much as another truck payment. Much less the hassle of having to replace it every 3 or 4 months.

    1. Re:Maybe they could market it as a Fire Truck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite the 'flavor' of recent reporting, you'll have a tough time finding a non-electric vehicle with a *lower* burn rate than the Teslas at this stage. For the Tesla EVs to catch up to 'normal' cars, it'd need to have 11-12 fires per year if they never sold a single additional vehicle. If they continue producing and selling at the current rate, that'd be about 18-20 fires per year this time next year. So far, the Tesla 'fires per year' statistic is less than 1. (There have been 3 fires, and they have been available for *more* than 3 years.)

      'Normal' cars, which you assume are safer, actually have an annoying tendency to catch fire *without* shoving a massive piece of steel debris through a 1/4" hardened steel plate, or crashing it through a cement wall and landing it in a tree. They catch fire doing such dangerous things as driving down a side road at 35MPH, idling at a stop light, or sitting parked in a garage *turned off*.

  36. Right, no profit from niche features or luxury by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    That's why Mercedes and BMW went out of business in the 50's, and GM discontinued the Cadillac line during the Carter Administration. As for Ford, they stopped making the high end 450 dualies because no one buys pickups for more than $30k.

  37. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by couchslug · · Score: 1

    One of mine actually WAS destroyed that way. In a diesel delivery van.

    All vehicles burn nicely, and the fire need not begin with either petrol or EV drive batteries. Google "Ford cruise control switch fires".

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  38. Come on. Make a 40K sedan first. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    What's wrong with this guy. He keeps launching and suggesting new ideas every other week, without actually delivering something most of his fans are begging for.

    Enough pie in the sky and train in the tube already.

    Haul your tail in and make and deliver a decent 40K Tesla sedan.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Come on. Make a 40K sedan first. by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with this guy. He keeps launching and suggesting new ideas every other week, without actually delivering something most of his fans are begging for.

      That's what Elon sells - ideas. He sells the idea that if you buy his $70k car, you're doing a big part to help humanity move towards a more sustainable future. The reality is, lithium ion batteries are resource intensive to build and the electricity to charge it (in the USA) is 68% fossil fuel derived.

      There's nothing new under the sun when it comes to electric powered everything. We already have a great understanding how to build an electric motor for any conceivable purpose. Where a breakthrough is really needed, is in the storing of electricity - that's what would enable Tesla (or any other car company) to release an inexpensive electric vehicle. The thing is, Elon is just going to sit on his ass and wait for someone else to make a breakthrough in less expensive batteries and then he'll announce a vehicle that incorporates it. Kinda like how Apple gets credit for all their "inventions".

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    2. Re:Come on. Make a 40K sedan first. by bledri · · Score: 2

      What's wrong with this guy. He keeps launching and suggesting new ideas every other week, without actually delivering something most of his fans are begging for.

      Enough pie in the sky and train in the tube already.

      Haul your tail in and make and deliver a decent 40K Tesla sedan.

      From TFA:

      It'll be a while, though. In the meantime, Tesla has a Model X crossover to launch and a smaller, more affordable sedan to develop--so don't expect to see a pickup for another five years or so.

      And for what it's worth, he's clearly stated he won't be involved with the HyperLoop because he's too busy with Tesla and Space X. And what's so terrible about having ideas?

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    3. Re:Come on. Make a 40K sedan first. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      He won't be involved with the Hyperloop because it is not feasable. The earth shifts, moves, pushes this way and that. High speed, long runs aren't reasonable engineering undertakings. Hell, we can't even keep above-ground railroad tracks straight and aligned.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Come on. Make a 40K sedan first. by foobar+bazbot · · Score: 1

      the electricity to charge it (in the USA) is 68% fossil fuel derived.

      Which is 32% less than ICE cars. And a lot of the 68% is from coal, which (1) we have a lot more of than oil and (2) is hard to use in ICEs (yeah, gassification's an option) but easy to use for electricity generation. It's not a renewable paradise or anything, but it's not half bad.

    5. Re:Come on. Make a 40K sedan first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a minivan! I love minivans but you can only get gas hogs...

  39. Texas: Fighting two battles at once by tokiko · · Score: 1

    Most of Tesla's problems in Texas are from eliminating the dealership. For example, I had no problems when I recently bought my all electric Nissan Leaf from Gunn Nissan in San Antonio, TX.

    About 50% of the human race is middlemen and they don’t take kindly to being eliminated. This [state]...we play nice. Got enemies enough as it is.

    The far more important battle, switching from gas to electric vehicles, has less to do with Texas.

  40. Run out of gas by amightywind · · Score: 0

    I dunno. When my truck runs out of gas I can use the spare gas can in the back. What does a Tesla do when it runs out of juice, burst into flames?

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  41. Texas can probably safely be ignored by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    "Musk said it will be about five years before the company builds its pickup however, giving it time to focus on another hurdle: breaking into the pickup market. Texas is where trucks rule, and Texas, as we know, is the Bermuda Triangle for Tesla."

    The latter portion of this statement seems to be an editorial comment by the submitter - not a statement by Musk. That being said, the submitter doesn't seem to have bothered to Google - Texas is the single largest consumer of pickup trucks, but sales there only account for sixteen percent of total US sales. Seems to me that you could build quite a sizable and profitable pickup truck business without ever selling one in Texas.

  42. Retro Electro... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    There's a brewery in Canada called Steam Whistle Pilsner that has built an awesome electric vintage hot rod pickup - "Retro Electro." It was a restoration / build from the ground up. Whenever I see it gliding around town I have vehicle envy...

    http://www.steamwhistle.ca/retroelectro/index.php

  43. squandered research on purpose by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    These electric vehicles were destroyed to **guarantee revenue streams** which have been in place for centuries.

    It was the global aristocracy that 'killed the electric car'

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:squandered research on purpose by Smauler · · Score: 2

      No... these electric vehicles were destroyed because they were awful. They were slow as hell, and/or had crap range. And they took a half day or so to recharge.

      Tesla has succeeded because they have good/ok performance, and ok range. The charging time and availability is still an issue, but that's something the buyers can deal with.

    2. Re:squandered research on purpose by CaptSlaq · · Score: 1

      No... these electric vehicles were destroyed because they were awful. They were slow as hell, and/or had crap range. And they took a half day or so to recharge.

      Tesla has succeeded because they have good/ok performance, and ok range. The charging time and availability is still an issue, but that's something the buyers can deal with.

      I can't speak to the RAV4 or the Ranger, but all reports of the EV1 were that it was acceptably quick and had nearly 100 miles range if you were kind to the accelerator. The EV1 was destroyed because someone at GM didn't want it around anymore.

    3. Re:squandered research on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These cars had a range of upwards of 140 miles per charge (EPA Certified) and took 8 hours to fully charge with a decent amount of get up and go. They weren't commuter cars but they were just fine for 90% of the average persons driving. FAR from awful. The buyers at the time were salivating over them then, they could and were wanting to actually deal with it.

      They were destroyed to preserve revenues and the Toyota RAV4 EV was no longer allowed to get replacement batteries after Chevron and GM bought the patent for the battery technology and mothballed it for vehicle use. The only reason they are doing it now is the fact that the patent expires in 2014 so they have no choice unless they can pull a Walt Disney and get it extended.

      They were no more awful than most of the vehicles we have today, I would have taken them over a Prius any day.

      The ONLY thing you got right in your post was the fact that the Telsa is better, but after 14 years, it better be.

    4. Re:squandered research on purpose by Solandri · · Score: 2

      The EV1 was destroyed because California pulled the rug out from under GM. The whole reason GM built the EV1 was to qualify for California's Zero Emissions Vehicle requirement. California passed a law saying that by (I think) 2000, a certain percentage of all vehicles each company sold had to be ZEVs. Some of the automakers researched fuel cells, GM and others went the EV route.

      About a year before the deadline, it was pretty clear GM was the only company with a viable ZEV. They stood to make $billions licensing the technology to the other companies so they too could meet California's ZEV requirement (and thus be allowed to continue to sell cars in California). The other companies got together, lobbied California saying the technology just wasn't ready for a ZEV yet, and presented the hybrid as an interim alternative. California agreed and rescinded the ZEV requirement. The environmentalists howled (because hybrids still burned gas - yes, the environmentalists initially hated hybrids). And GM was royally screwed. The $1 billion or so in R&D they'd pumped into the EV1 program was now worthless.

      GM systematically dismantled and destroyed every EV1 it had made. They were silent about why, but if you know the whole story it's pretty obvious. If you dangle a carrot in front of a company to lead them to invest a billion dollars in R&D, you don't take the carrot away just as they're about to grab it. California set up a law to reward companies who spent substantial R&D money qualifying for the law, then changed the law at the last minute to take away the reward. But they still wanted the benefit of the R&D those companies did. GM wasn't having any of that, and if they weren't going to profit from developing the EV1, then neither was California.

    5. Re:squandered research on purpose by pepty · · Score: 1

      California set up a law to reward companies who spent substantial R&D money qualifying for the law, then changed the law at the last minute to take away the reward. But they still wanted the benefit of the R&D those companies did. GM wasn't having any of that, and if they weren't going to profit from developing the EV1, then neither was California.

      Hogwash.

      1. GM and the other car companies played the Zero Emissions environmentalists against the people who wanted fleet averages. The ZEV mandate allowed them to continue to sell their most profitable vehicles without worrying about mileage.

      2. The resulting mandate for a percentage of the market to be ZEVs was easily recognizable as unenforceable as written: CA politicians weren't going run for re-election while the cars, SUVs, and pickups their constituents wanted to buy were being banned. A mandate based on incremental fines and fleet averages would have been much harder to kill if it had been enacted. That's the reason car companies chose to let the ZEV mandate pass: not because they planned on meeting it, but because it would be easier to kill later on

      3. The cave in on the ZEV mandate was completely predictable, especially to GM which lobbied to kill it. Why would GM have sought to delay and finally kill the mandate if it would have given them a competitive advantage? GM could never have met the mandate, wasn't planning to, and neither could any of the other manufacturers.

      4. GM's billion dollar investment in R&D was well subsidized by the ~50% R&D tax credit and research grants. It was also great PR at a time when their profit center (trucks) was being assailed for inefficiency.

      5. GM got rid of the existing EV1s because EV1s went from being expensive good PR to being expensive bad PR, full stop. How do you expect the state of California was going to profit from GM's EV1s? Do you seriously think GM's board/shareholders based their decisions on petty revenge instead of quarterly returns?

      CARB and environmentalists were played by GM and other politically savvy car companies from beginning to end on the ZEV mandate. We could have had a lot more hybrids and fuel efficient cars and trucks on the road during the 'aughts; instead we got a documentary about the EV1.

  44. this is not productive discussion... by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Electric vehicles in general are insanely expensive. I was watching Top gear (the crappy American version) and the had "Entry Level" electric vehicles on there.

    Oh you saw a TV show once about electric cars?

    **farts**

    Seriously don't expect to arrive to any conclusions looking at this situation in that manner...

    Electric car technology was purposefully pushed aside and kept on the shelf.

    Question: Why do critics of big biz always just take for granted what the Corp. says the product in question costs? Be it gasoline or electric cars or w/e...

    I don't trust the valuation that a typical US publicly held Corp puts on their products. It's **not** based on simple supply/demand, but all their unnecessary "market research" abstractions. Plus don't get me started on the 'marketing' budget for products.

    Every time you see a commercial or social media bit, remember that the company advertising made the choice to make their product **more expensive** so that you could see that ad.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  45. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I heard the number was 17 vehicles burn every hour in the U.S.. But Tesla won't be able to capture the moment till they to have their own VIAGRA commerical.

  46. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    You fail statistics, AC. Don't you have a lottery ticket to buy?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  47. Texas Bermuda Triangle by Now15 · · Score: 2

    Slightly off-topic, but what is stopping Tesla from establishing a franchise store in Texas? What stops Elon Musk from personally establishing an dealership like any other?

    --

    Computers are useless: they can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Texas Bermuda Triangle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla doesn't use dealerships where the price is haggled over and the salesman tries every trick in the book to get more out of you.

      Instead they have stores where prices are fixed and are what they would be if you ordered off the website. You can either have one built to order or you can go to a Tesla store, test drive one and buy a pre made off the lot. provided they have any in stock since they seem to be selling just as fast as they can make them, hence the reason they are building another factory.

      If you get the base model and want to increase it's range all you have to do is go to the store, pay for the upgrade and, if they have the fast swap system they've made to replace charging should Teslas get popular enough you'll have the upgraded battery instaled and ready to go. The demos they did showed that the system could swap out the batteries twice in the time it took to fill a 12 gallon gas tank.

  48. finally by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    finally some decend looking cars... Most normal cars are soooooo ugly these days.. I hope Jeep will make an all electric cherokee/wrangler.. Electric cars are the future...

  49. Tesla the fire engine? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Tesla the fire engine?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  50. On a side note by Murdoch5 · · Score: 2

    Why a truck? 99% of the pickup trucks on the road are just for show, almost no one who owns one actually carries anything in them. I think we should actually ban trucks in larger cities like Toronto with out a special permit. We have societies obsessed with bigger and more power trucks when in the end all they really need is a smart car. Lets stop building pickup trucks and focus more on size and power efficient cars. I know this isn't in line with this post but I think someone has to mention this issue.

    1. Re:On a side note by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      We should discourage pickups running around w/ constantly empty beds --- I have one, and try to only move it when I'm hauling stuff, or for a bi-weekly constitutional trip to keep the tires round and the batteries charged --- been riding my bike to work since my wife is driving my car since hers was totaled and hasn't yet been replaced.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    2. Re:On a side note by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Yes I agree, if you own a pickup you should be towing or moving loads, other wise keep it parked.

  51. Weird, this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When put up to defend their hatchet job against the electric cars from Tesla, the show say they are not a factual show, they are merely entertainment and everyone knows this.

    Yet here YOU are, thinking that Top Gear is a factual show.

    Obviously either you're far dumber than almost every other watcher of the show, or they're lying.

  52. Tesla please make it a compact pickup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly my dream vehicle right now would be an compact electric 4WD pickup that can tow up to 5000 pounds, and has an optional gas powered range extender that you can load in the bed. Something about the size of my dad's old toyota stout would be perfect. I drive a smart car and would love to have one with a 5.5 ft bed on the back. With the CAFE standards the way they are currently designed there is no logical way to produce a gas powered vehicle in that form factor so I am stuck waiting on an electric.

    1. Re:Tesla please make it a compact pickup. by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      That's a brilliant idea, and I'd be very interested in something like that --- hopefully Tesla's concept will be equally ingenious and flexible.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  53. Words mean nothing to you, do they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, no fuel is needed.

    He said fuel.

    Not power.

    Fuel.

    Why then did you ask whether it needed power?

    Because you're a fucking idiot?

    Oh, you betcha!

    (and the point being that you can manufacture your own electricity if you buy the generator. But you can't manufacture your own gasolene for your car. Even if you bought the distillery)

    Oh and for the other moron, davester666, at $1/watt three grand would get you 3kW of generation and you'd get over a day, 11.5kWh. Put a battery on that and you can charge your truck overnight from the energy you got during the day.

    Total running cost: around $100 a year, including the interest on the loan of $3000.

  54. Tesla truck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Base it on the Toyota Tundra style and they would have a winner here in CA.

  55. You Missed Your Chance, But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You missed your chance. Ford and Chevrolet already made and subsequently discontinued small all-electric pickups. But, all is not lost. There are a growing number of full-sized hybrid gas/electric pickups on the market. These meet your specifications almost perfectly.

  56. Never owned a car but may buy an electric truck by CyclistOne · · Score: 1

    I'm 68, and I've never owned a car, but an all electric truck would be very tempting.

  57. They should call it... by eth1 · · Score: 1

    the pF-150 :)

  58. yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a motorcycle!

  59. to guarantee century-old revenue streams... by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    They were silent about why, but if you know the whole story it's pretty obvious

    yes. it is obvious.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  60. Self-powered trailers by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

    I think the solution will be power-assist trailers that use hub motors. Your trailer should be stacked with solar panels and charge itself and the truck continuously and potentially includes a generator already.

  61. Re:If UPS/FedEx use this technolgy in their trucks by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    I guess we should have stopped taking flights in Boeing air planes after they had electrical fire issues right?

    You mean you didn't already?

    That said, I take very little note of what particular aircraft I'm flying in. The only ones I've noticed in the last few months have been Embraers (Brazilian? Yes.) and various AirBuses. But to be honest, I only notice the model if I have to pick up the flight safety card to check if there's an exit behind me. Normally I notice that when I'm getting on board, because I try to avoid the crush by boarding as late as possible.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"