Slashdot Mirror


NSA Wants To Reveal Its Secrets To Prevent Snowden From Revealing Them First

binarstu writes "According to a recent report by Tom Gjelten of NPR, 'NSA officials are bracing for more surveillance disclosures from the documents taken by former contractor Edward Snowden — and they want to get out in front of the story. ... With respect to other information held by Snowden and his allies but not yet publicized, the NSA is now considering a proactive release of some of the less sensitive material, to better manage the debate over its surveillance program.'"

50 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. Psyops at its finest. by starworks5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you get to frame the issue the way you want, you can try to convince the people that it was for their own good. Snowden may likely say show that it was used abused in practice, and the NSA likely wants to say that they prevented a suspected domestic terrorist.

    1. Re:Psyops at its finest. by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup, this is exactly it. Unfortunately a whole lot of people don't think much about what we already know. The few that know and care won't be easily pacified by what the NSA starts releasing. We already know they lie, and anyone that trusts a liar is a fool.

      Personally, I think the damage control is not really needed. I guess it may be trying to push some people back down into slumber. The Obamacare fiasco shows just how far out of reality countless Americans really are. Don't get me wrong, people are waking up. I'm just not confident enough will be awake in time to prevent some very very bad things from happening in a very short time.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    2. Re:Psyops at its finest. by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly.

      I've been posting this prediction all along.

      They will own it in public statements, (or at least they will own part of it), and they will tell you to get over it. They will then go on to even bigger excesses and violations. They will attempt to have laws passed making encryption a crime (again).

      You haven't seen anything yet.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:Psyops at its finest. by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Snowden may likely say show that it was used abused in practice, and the NSA likely wants to say that they prevented a suspected domestic terrorist.

      NSA will also probably claim that they were going to release/review this material anyway, and Snowden just forced them to do it too early (thus jeopardizing security, etc, etc.)

      I found it fascinating when Obama made these claims -- that he was going to review and fix the entire NSA program any day now and that Snowden just forced him to do it in a rush instead of carefully.

    4. Re:Psyops at its finest. by boorack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Given their record of factuality in their official statements this whole bruhaha about "openess" it is more likely to be lie. Given number of transgressions and laws broken by NSA we've seen in Snowden documents, they just can't release such things, so it is lie for sure. They only thing they propably want to achieve by this manipulation is to make whistleblowers' life harder. After all, despite of all bullshit and propaganda in corporate media citizenry is now behind Snowden. What they want is propably to have some leverage to explain to public that future whistleblowers' revelations are 'redundant', so they'll have public consent to prosecute or exterminate future whistleblowers and also journalists. This corresponds pretty well with latest law pushed by Feinstein that legalizes all NSA transgressions we've seen in latest months and mandates harsh penalties for both whistleblowers leaking inconvenient materials and journalists publishing such revelations. In short, Obama regime is now busy reinforcing its grip on what public should and shouldn't know.

    5. Re:Psyops at its finest. by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We want to reveal the lie before Snowden reveals the truth.

    6. Re:Psyops at its finest. by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      You mean successor, not predecessor.

    7. Re:Psyops at its finest. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2

      We were secretly giving Americans anal probes during their sleep. It was for your own good so that the terrorists wouldn't win.

    8. Re:Psyops at its finest. by ApplePy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given their record of factuality in their official statements this whole bruhaha about "openess" it is more likely to be lie.

      Congratulations! If there were a /. Achievement for Understatement of the Week, you'd have won it! :)

      --
      That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
    9. Re:Psyops at its finest. by stenvar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I found it fascinating when Obama made these claims -- that he was going to review and fix the entire NSA program any day now and that Snowden just forced him to do it in a rush instead of carefully.

      I think it's become clear that you can't believe anything Obama says. That's not "fascinating", it's deeply disturbing in the top executive of our government. The president is supposed to be boring, honest, and careful; instead, we got an activist and a liar.

    10. Re:Psyops at its finest. by flyneye · · Score: 2

      Yeah, too little, too late. They're gonna have to look under every rock to dig up a few who would believe them. Maybe they should have a more trustworthy spokesman speak for them, like a used car dealer.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    11. Re:Psyops at its finest. by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I found it fascinating when Obama made these claims -- that he was going to review and fix the entire NSA program any day now and that Snowden just forced him to do it in a rush instead of carefully.

      On the good side, he can now skip right to closing Guantanamo Bay.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    12. Re:Psyops at its finest. by Xest · · Score: 2

      Only to selected media outlets, and the fact they've been drip feeding is the exact point. He still has the option of an all out dump to everyone if he feels the NSA is hijacking the agenda from the select few media outlets that are only dripping very slowly.

    13. Re:Psyops at its finest. by mean+pun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's become clear that you can't believe anything Obama says. That's not "fascinating", it's deeply disturbing in the top executive of our government. The president is supposed to be boring, honest, and careful; instead, we got an activist and a liar.

      The last boring, honest, and careful president that the USA elected was Jimmy Carter, and look how popular he is. His successor was the opposite, and look how popular he is. It seems to me that the USA does not want boring, honest, and careful, it wants and gets flimflam artists.

      Yes, US policy is thoroughly corrupt because money talks in US elections. But why does this work? Because the US electorate wants their flimflam. They don't want honest and careful candidates, and certainly not boring ones. They want show and glitz and scandal and outrage. And the more money you have as a politician, the more flimflam you can serve up.

    14. Re:Psyops at its finest. by intermodal · · Score: 2

      what's really interesting is that they'll have to be careful, lest they contradict the documents Snowden appropriated. We already have no reason to trust them. If they want us to believe them, they're going to have to use such opportunities to be verifiable rather than "take our word for it".

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    15. Re:Psyops at its finest. by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems like sarcasm, but just in case. The made up statement of "millions of terrorists" needs to be proven before we could prove the NSA stops them. When we found out that the FBI is recruiting most "terrorists", assisting them with plans, and providing them fake materials, it became obvious that there are very few terrorists.

      I'm pretty sure that many at the NSA believe that they really are doing the right thing, just like most at the FBI would believe they are doing the right thing. Their "belief" is no different than the person who believes that these agencies are required to keep them safe from non-existent threats. It does not make the threat exist.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    16. Re:Psyops at its finest. by Immerman · · Score: 2

      "Just math" that lets you communicate without the oversight of the (ahem) benevolent overlords who write the laws. Such communication could be used for all sorts of double-plus ungood purposes that might undermine the agenda of those who are busily concentrating as much wealth and power as possible, to protect us all from the burdens of opportunity of course.

      As for outlawing envelopes, there's no need. We've already got the technology to read the ink right through the paper (can't be bothered to find the link)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    17. Re:Psyops at its finest. by stenvar · · Score: 2

      Many US presidents in those 225 years were pretty boring and ineffectual, in part because the federal government mattered very little to most people's lives.

    18. Re:Psyops at its finest. by Xest · · Score: 2

      Yes, I'm well aware that he stated that, but it doesn't mean he can't get access to the data again if he wanted to, if he doesn't actually still have it anyway.

      I doubt for even an absolute second that he actually relinquished all methods of being able to access it, possibly leaving a copy with a friend, or on a server somewhere. Hell, by the sounds of it the last Wikileaks 400gb insurance dump is exactly that data so he presumably knows the key and could hence probably just as well download it if he wants to.

      At worst it's likely he isn't carrying it on his person so that he had plausible deniability with the Russians and Chinese that he didn't have access to the data.

      Even if he really doesn't have a copy stored somewhere I'm short a quick phonecall to Greenwald would suffice.

  2. Round 1: Fight by DrPBacon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Snowden Wins.

    --
    Spent All My Mod Points
    1. Re:Round 1: Fight by Zemran · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nah, they will do a Assange on him but with 10 year girls making the accusations this time and no one will ever be able to discuss what he said again. People will just talk about the accusation instead of the issue. If you look at the accusations they are so stupid but it whitewashed the whole Wikileaks issue. Same with Strauss Khan...

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Round 1: Fight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Strauss Khan was well known in France for his sex-obsession and his inability to take "no" as an answer. Just in the two years leading up to his arrest, he had a journalist that accused him of being a bit too forceful, and an employee in the IMF that wrote a letter explaining how he behaved.

      But of course it is easier to believe that there is a hidden agenda everywhere, because it's true, it was mindbogglingly stupid of him.

  3. popularity contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Snowden is a loser because he doesn't have anything new to tell you! Don't listen to losers! NSA are the popular dudes now! Hot NSA gossip over here! Snowden loses celebrity status!"

  4. Credibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would anyone actually believe anything the NSA has to say at this point?

    1. Re:Credibility? by TheP4st · · Score: 2

      Would anyone except cold fjord actually believe anything the NSA has to say at this point?

      TFTFY

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  5. Openness by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether government openness happens because of a leaker, or it happens because of fear of leakers, or because it believes it's the right thing to do...the more open the government is about its activities, the better.

    1. Re:Openness by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      .the more open the government is about its activities, the better.

      Openness is good, yes. But what the NSA will release will be misdirection, dissembling, disingenuousness and lies.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  6. "manage the debate" by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Basically means "Framing the narrative" which is the foundation for successful newspeak. This is an attempt to control the base from which relative judgments are made by the public. No thanks.

  7. So, they are acknowleging improper classification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Either the information is too sensitive for the public to know, or it isn't. If it isn't, then it should have been public to begin with.

  8. First trivial information request for NSA by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since they are releasing trivial information about themselves, how about this:
    What role did the NSA have in the piece of shit hatchet job movie on wikileaks that came out recently?

    If reality was anything like it people would have just told Assange to fuck off and wikileaks would never have happened. All the movie character has is dance moves and insomnia.

  9. Imminent Catastrophe by MarkvW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where's the great catastrophe for all the TRILLIONS of dollars we are wasting at the NSA?

    This is unimaginable waste for negligible gain. And these people call themselves patriots . . ..

  10. true, even spun, more is better, unless misinforma by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Indeed. It'll be spun, they are trying to frame the narrative, but it's awesome that they are being forced to try that. Info will come out. Some truth will come out accidentally. For example, when a leading democrat senator was asked about restoring funding for children's cancer treatment during the government shutdown he said "why would I want to do that?" - accidentally revealing that getting one over on the republicans is far more important to him than saving kids suffering from cancer. I'm sure NSA will have a few things like that.

    However, as crioca points out, some of what NSA releases will be disinformation. We need to guard against not just the spin they put on it, but probably complete fabrications as well.

  11. What's really scary by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What really scares me isn't that the Americans themselves don't seem to care a lot. Europe has been a prime target of all this and even there the reaction is "meh". How many USA ambassadors have been summoned to explain and apologize? The USA has treated their allies worse than most of Europe would treat their enemies and still nothing came of this. It turns out Europe isn't that different after all....

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:What's really scary by ImOuttaHere · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What really scares me isn't that the Americans themselves don't seem to care a lot.

      "Freedom" and "liberty" are abstract concepts to most Americans. The only thing "real" in their lives are their TV, cellphones, and the perception that "We're number ONE!" . They don't call it "programming" for nothing.

      Europe has been a prime target of all this and even there the reaction is "meh".

      Er... no. There are many responses to the NSA revelations. European business are actively moving away from using Goggle's and other US corporate services because they have confirmation that their data is not secure. European governments are dealing from a much stronger position on trade talks currently taking place. The citizens of Europe (well, at least the ones I've spoken with, and you really should listen to Radio France Info) are well aware of the issues of privacy and they are demanding their governments take action to secure their liberties and freedoms against US spying.

      How many USA ambassadors have been summoned to explain and apologize?

      US ambassadors have been called by France, Germany, Spain... um, should I continue? Or should I add the British ambassadors that have also been called?

      The USA has treated their allies worse than most of Europe would treat their enemies and still nothing came of this. It turns out Europe isn't that different after all....

      Huh? Really? Um... just to start... how about explaining how Europe's spy apparatus is structured and deployed and compare it against how the US, Israel, and China deploy theirs? It could make for an interesting study in contrasts and motivations. Then we could move onto how coordination between European and US spy agencies is pretty much on the rocks right now.

    2. Re:What's really scary by tstur · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't suppose US allies are doing the exact same thing or would if they could? Information is power. Naturally, they must feign outrage and disdain, and meanwhile put their own similar programs on lock down. NSA is probably the envy of the international intelligence community.

  12. Warning: Only claims to openness by rsborg · · Score: 2

    Whether government openness happens because of a leaker, or it happens because of fear of leakers, or because it believes it's the right thing to do...the more open the government is about its activities, the better.

    You think they're actually going to tell the whole truth? Or even a meaningfully valid part? It may be openness, but if it is just an attempt to expose a small thing to hide a bigger ugly truth (or crime), then it's deceptive nonetheless.

    I await the openness. I don't have a strong expectation it will be worthwhile.

    This is an agency that is rooted in deception. Why do you think Snowden's uncomfortable facts are going to change their nature?

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  13. Americans: NSA needs more oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's not true you know, only 17% of Americans think the NSA oversight is OK, with the majority wanting reform.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/02/surveillance-poll_n_4195379.html

    They may be misinformed about the depth of the problems, but even the problems they can see are enough to demand better oversight.

    In the UK, the press is very pro-surveillance nanny state, but even there that's swinging now against the spooks mass surveillance programs. They're trying to rein it back in with "speculation helps terrorists", and threats to the press, trying to shut down the debate they know they would lose.

    Really we're past that now, enough people are concerned enough to effect change and the spooks are accusing them of being terrorists that need to be watched.

    Cameron is deleting former speeches, so he's compromised. He's was against the police state and now he's trying to re-write history by deleting his speeches on it. The spooks are trying to drive the agenda with scare-mongering and arrests under anti-terror laws of journalists.

    It's tipping point stuff.

    1. Re:Americans: NSA needs more oversight by erikkemperman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny thing about "oversight". On the one hand it means some mechanism to keep tabs on some process making sure it doesn't run amok. On the other hand it also means to neglect something.

      Seems to me the NSA oversight is more like the latter, except not by accident.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    2. Re:Americans: NSA needs more oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not true you know, only 17% of Americans think the NSA oversight is OK, with the majority wanting reform.

      Polls are nonsense a grand majority of the time. Fact is, most people asked for this after 9/11; they traded freedom for 'security,' and they got exactly what they deserved: an even more tyrannical government. Sadly, the rest of us who didn't want that to happen are also stuck with this garbage.

    3. Re:Americans: NSA needs more oversight by morgauxo · · Score: 2

      I'll believe they want reform when the stop electing the same old assholes.

    4. Re:Americans: NSA needs more oversight by s.petry · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In both countries the governments own the media. More appropriately, the same people controlling the governments control the media. Neither place has had any type of reform, just discussions of reform which are being drowned out by other noise in the media.

      To the people pulling the strings, it's simply a waiting game. As we saw with Benghazi, Fast and Furious, etc.. nobody has been held accountable and the public is no longer thinking about those items. I have little confidence that enough people are awake to change that, and the same thing is being played against the anti-surveillance crowd. Unless we can change the messages from the media, nothing will change. Word of mouth is something that works, but is also very taxing on the people that are awake.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    5. Re:Americans: NSA needs more oversight by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, we can't be glad they changed their mind when they realized what they'd done?

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    6. Re:Americans: NSA needs more oversight by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

      I can't help but wonder why security didn't check Snoden's tractor trailer when he drove it into work on his last day. I'm just amazed that no one put two and two together. It seems like the longer Snoden is away, the more secrets he illuminates. I can't help but wonder if other spy agency's are currently giving him secrets that they acquired on their own, and now the U.S. gets to take the hit. If so, it is a master stroke.

  14. Is Snowden any less than a patriot? by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After all the material that's been leaked by Snowden, is there any question that the man is a patriot?

    So what does that make our government?

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  15. Sad indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is probably mostly because those european contries where actively working with the NSA. So they (the governments) pretty much knew what was going on and they are scared of their own criminal activities being revealed.

    Where I live (The Netherlands) the government is trying to pretty much start doing the same as the NSA is doing, just more in public. Very scary indeed. I really hope the sensible people here will be able to stop them.

  16. AKA a Limited Hangout properganda teqchnique by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Oh it can be pretty successful if done right. The NSA will little doubt start doing Limited Hangouts of information.

    A limited hangout, or partial hangout, is a public relations or propaganda technique that involves the release of previously hidden information in order to prevent a greater exposure of more important details.

    [sarcasm] By lucky coincidence [/sarcasm] the NSA are now allowed to go direct to the public with their message (see "'Anti-Propaganda' Ban Repealed... Direct Broadcasting at American Citizens"), not that private mass media was not on their side to begin with anyway.

    When journalists get around later to releasing Snowdens whistleblower material as a "full hangout" truth, most mass media will then shout LALALA OLD NEWS nothing to see here as loud as they can to drown it out. You might even see it being marked as a dupe here on /.

  17. Spinning out of control? by erroneus · · Score: 2

    Is this what you would call "spin control"? People have gradually been more educated on the nature of spin and are no longer quite as affected. Ok, so people ARE affected still but fewer than ever before. And besides that, no matter what the NSA "reveals" it will be fact-checked against everything we know, leakers from insiders and, of course, from Snowden and his documents.

    When I was younger, I once reflected that the nature of a government can be determined by which directions it points its guns. Fondly, I used China and the USSR as examples where the guns pointed inward. But now, in the USSA (not a typo) we've got an unprecedented amount of guns and ammo pointing inwardly at us. I just never thought I would use the gun pointing direction thing to describe what's wrong with the USSA.

  18. 500 pages released by pellik · · Score: 2

    499 of them redacted, one blank.

  19. Damage control, spin and rhetoric by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    NSA had the chance, in a court, to tell the truth. They declined. Why would they do thing any differently?

    I think the first thing I want to hear from the NSA is how they are going to bring those to trial who were responsible for all the lies, breaking of laws, and how tax dollars got approved for a f#cking Holodeck.

    I'll take Snowden's version all day long. He's got the facts and proof backing it up. NSA is just going to mudsling, spout rhetoric, run damage control and spin, spin, spin. There will be no truth.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  20. YES. YES, YES!!! by crovira · · Score: 2

    Its about time. What really pisses me off about the NSA isn't that its just a warmed over version of Pointdexter's TIA (Total Information Awareness) but the secrecy.

    Forget about privacy. That toothpaste been squeezed out of the tube for years.

    WE'RE paying for all of this in all the ways possible and we're not seeing any benefits.

    Why not?

    Because its all supposed to be a big secret.

    SCREW the NSA's sense of entitlement to OUR data.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.