Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Can You Trust Online Tax Software?

An anonymous reader writes "TurboTax from Intuit and H&R Block's own tax package have been perennial mainstays for U.S. citizens trying to use software to figure out just how much they owe the country, without reading the tens of thousands of pages of IRS forms guidance. With tax season just around the corner, the new online platforms from both providers raise an interesting question: can you trust your return information any more or less to an online platform than you do to the equivalent software on your computer?"

53 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...whose name you know. More than once it incorrectly calculated taxes owed, leading both the Fed and State governments to send me a check, saying, "hey, you way overpaid your taxes."

    I'm done with tax software. It's back to a human accountant. Her first consultation with us turned up a $3,400 deduction we had missed a couple of years back. That alone pays for a few years of returns and advice.

    1. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm done with tax software. It's back to a human accountant.

      Are you aware that most human accountants use ... tax software?

      Her first consultation with us turned up a $3,400 deduction we had missed a couple of years back. That alone pays for a few years of returns and advice.

      Most likely she found that deduction by running tax software. I use Turbo Tax, but I also keep up on tax law, and changes to the software, so that helps me find deductions a less informed person using the same software, would miss. Software is a tool, it can do more in the hands of a skilled user.

      If you spend a day studying tax law and reading your software's manual, you will save more money than you earn at your job in a month. It is time well spent.

    2. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No. No, I won't save more money than I earn at my job in a month. There's not that much more to save. And I earn a lot. Enough that I've decided not to spend my leisure time becoming a tax accountant - you know, someone whose *job* it is to know taxes. Software doesn't mean shit, it's the person using it *and* their knowledge.

      I could also paint my entire house, but I don't feel like doing that either.

      I don't regard spending time learning tax regulations as time well spent. And, wrong again... she didn't find the deduction using tax software, but by looking at our returns, how we work, and then interviewing us. You know, employing skills that software doesn't do well.

      Other than that, your analysis was spot on.

    3. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK, how about three anecdotes? Last time I used TurboTax I got a polite letter from the IRS saying I owed $68,000. I ran over to an accountant who reviewed our return, ended up getting us a refund of over $5000 and more than payed for herself.

      Turbo Tax is OK, but the tax code is so complicated that if you have anything other than 'normal' income (ie, W2's and 1099's) you may miss out on big problems or rewards. No more TT for me. Actually, the accountant does use some form of Intuit software, but it's far beyond my interests and abilities. And I agree with other posters. I could probably learn the stuff, but would rather start pulling out my toenails with pliers, thankyouverymuch.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by ktappe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, employing skills that software doesn't do well..

      I'm not following this. Software (I use TaxAct) is quite good at making sure to ask you a lot of detailed questions about your life events and situation. Software can make sure to ask these questions and not forget one like a human can. If you, the end-user, neglect to check a box that says (for example), "I donated a car this year", then that's your fault not the software's. If you're trying to say the accountant would ask "Hey, are you sure you didn't donate a car?" and you respond "Oh yeah...you're right, I did," then OK, the human is better at coaxing info out of you (or inducing you to lie.) Personally, I'll stick to software.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    5. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by mjwx · · Score: 2

      No. No, I won't save more money than I earn at my job in a month. There's not that much more to save. And I earn a lot. Enough that I've decided not to spend my leisure time becoming a tax accountant - you know, someone whose *job* it is to know taxes. Software doesn't mean shit, it's the person using it *and* their knowledge.

      I could also paint my entire house, but I don't feel like doing that either.

      I don't regard spending time learning tax regulations as time well spent. And, wrong again... she didn't find the deduction using tax software, but by looking at our returns, how we work, and then interviewing us. You know, employing skills that software doesn't do well.

      This, a good tax accountant saves you more than doing it yourself because they know all the loopholes and deductions you can claim without being flagged for an audit.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      Or even if flagged for an audit, as I was, they're able to justify the deductions... Yes, I really did go to grad school, even though the university never filed their paperwork to show my tuition. The supplies and equipment I donated to my church could be deducted, but I just had to get my minister to write a quick signed letter. The investment income I had that year wasn't all taxable, so it didn't all need to be declared as taxable income like the IRS claimed.

      Software's great for an estimate, and those estimates get closer every time I try my own hand at my taxes, but there's really no substitute for having a skilled professional look at your finances and figure out the correct arrangement. It's not even a matter of actually evading taxes, but legitimate deductions that the software could ask about, but the user won't understand.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    7. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by mjwx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Totally disagree. You will save far more by doing it yourself. The reason is that you will save little by finding a deduction here or there. You will save far more by actually understanding the tax law, and restructuring your financial life to take advantage of that knowledge

      Fine, let me know when you finish that 4 year degree and become a CPA (and how much it cost you). Then tell me how long it takes for you to become intimately familiar with the tax code and then tell me how long you spend keeping up on the changes to the tax code.

      Meanwhile I'll continue to spend a whopping $140 per year (which I claim on next years tax return, as well as the petrol I used getting from my home to his office) to have someone who does this for a living do it all for me and spend my time doing something I'd like to.

      So you think it's worth a 4 year degree, to save $140 a year... I'm sorry but after that I dont think it's a good idea to take tax advice from you.

      BTW: $140 p/a is expensive for a personal tax return in Oz, but this guy is brilliant.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Illustrating again that if you're rich there's always a way out of your taxes, if you're poor you pay every cent.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    9. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      Are you aware that most human accountants use ... tax software?

      I assume most experts in their field use software that is relevant to their field of expertise. I also assume they use it more effectively than I would, given the fact that I use the software relevant to my profession far more effectively than a non-expert possibly could. I assume I'm not a special snowflake in that regard, and thus this is a reasonable generalization.

      If you spend a day studying tax law and reading your software's manual, you will save more money than you earn at your job in a month. It is time well spent.

      Wrong analysis. If we assume (and this is a big assumption) that I save as much as the professional I could hire would, then it doesn't matter how much I save, it's the same either way. If doing it myself is going to require me spending a day studying tax law, the relevant question is, will it cost more or less than a day's earnings for me to just pay someone else do it for me? If you get paid enough, that seems unlikely. The time would be better spent doing your actual job, and using the money earned to pay the accountant.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    10. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by gravis777 · · Score: 2

      Are you aware that most human accountants use ... tax software?

      Truthfully, unless you go to a person who specializes in taxes, and has done so for years, I find that the online tax software is more efficiant than the human accountants. Many places, such as H&R Block, that sets up tax advisors in Walmart and places like that, hire out-of-work people, send them to school for a couple of weeks, hire them for about 3-4 months and pay them around $10 an hour. I know people who have done it. Many can hardly balance their check books, and they just run your numbers through the tax software.

      As far as the parent poster's $3400 deduction - the standardized deduction is higher than that, and pretty much everyone qualifies for that.

      As far as the original poster - I've been using online tax software for years. Really haven't thought anything about it. If you are refering to to security, I don't know if its really any more or less secure than any other option. As far as reliability - I have had a friend who was an accountant look over what the online service did from time to time, and she said it was fine.

      The online services seem to work fine if you qualify for the easy form. If you have tons of deductions and stuff like that you need to put in, such as taking care of disabled people, owning your own business, or something like that, you may want to go with a human accountant who does this type of stuff for a living (rather than a seasonal worker) who knows all the tax codes and all the deductions and stuff you can make.

    11. Re:I Used a Popular Online Tax Service... by drfred79 · · Score: 2

      As an accountant I disagree with everything you said. We use more powerful tax software that does very little other than simple mathematical calculations, collate data, and file in the correct IRS format. We are not using Turbotax or any Turbotax equivalent. In actuality we appreciate simple tax software for consumers because they have to come to us when something is wrong like the example before. Spending one day to learn what I spend my whole year doing will not minimize your tax liability. If so I have a one day crash course to become a modern artist or a lawyer.

  2. Worried the government will see it by GlobalEcho · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given the recent revelations about NSA spying, I refuse to use these services. The risk is simply too high that the government might see my tax returns.

    1. Re:Worried the government will see it by Anrego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes!

      An audit requires a large amount of time and effort on the part of the victim. It's an extremely time consuming and frustrating process if you have _simple_ finances. The NSA spying is largely transparent and non-intrusive.

    2. Re:Worried the government will see it by melikamp · · Score: 2

      And more to the point: I will fully trust the online tax software if it's free (libre), secure against eavesdroppers, and operated by the tax-collecting government agency itself.

  3. Australia by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Been doing it for years with government provided software.

    Mind you it doesn't say 'cloud' every 5 words, but it submits it all online and even auto fills in a lot of your data from government databases.
    Not sure how long it has been available for but many many years without incident.

    Oh and its free.

    1. Re:Australia by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Been doing it for years with government provided software.

      Mind you it doesn't say 'cloud' every 5 words, but it submits it all online and even auto fills in a lot of your data from government databases. Not sure how long it has been available for but many many years without incident.

      Oh and its free.

      Thankfully, Intuit, Inc. (by a totally crazy coincidence also the maker of TurboTax(tm), a market-leading tax software solution) has been fighting to save us from communism...

      So here in the Land of the Free, the IRS probably has the information it needs anyway (for fraud detection, and because Joe Worker's employer already reports it); but we can't let them destroy the free market, and capitalism itself, by making the process any easier. Instead, you just hand over your money and personal information to an 'Authorized e-File Provider' and be glad that you live in the bestest ever country on earth.

      We will be rolling out a similar system for health insurance soon.

    2. Re:Australia by cheater512 · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure I DO NOT want to see it's source code.
      That would probably give me nightmares.

    3. Re:Australia by stinerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, I mentioned that at work once. That in foreign countries your return is pretty much done for you, and you just sign off on it. If it isn't correct you provide proof and then send that amendment back in. I got an incredulous stare and an "Oh, that'd be great for the government. They could say whatever they wanted and people would just pay up."

      *sigh*

      A good many people have no idea that the IRS already has all your W-2s and could fill out a simple 1040-EZ on your behalf. Sure, when you're itemizing it would get a bit more complicated, but for the vast majority of folks who don't itemize, there is no reason that the IRS can't have everything filled out for you, and all you need to do is sign and return.

    4. Re:Australia by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      At risk of feeding the trolls, do you realize the category error you are making?

      When I'm interacting with a given entity, state or private, yeah I definitely do expect to be able to do so through a website they provide or (if such is relevant to the situation) an API they provide for other front-ends and clients.

      Having to hire an 'authorized e-file provider' in order to send a tax return to the IRS is like having to hire a third party to send in this post on my behalf. There isn't anything stopping me from doing so, if my requirements are esoteric in some way; but hell yeah I expect to be able to deal directly with the IRS when I have business with them (especially if I'm one of the numerous Americans whose tax return is basically the 1040-EZ that they already have all the data in).

      If tax accountants, tax attorneys, and prep services wish to market their services, that's all well and good; but the idea that the IRS should be forbidden to provide trivial 20th century customer service lest it step on their dainty toes? Nonsense.

      Nothing about that notion implies that there should be One Website For The People, Comrade!

    5. Re:Australia by ArbitraryName · · Score: 2

      If by ~2007 you mean 1993, then sure.

    6. Re:Australia by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not saying the system isn't with its flaws, but saying you'd rather have the government do it for you "for free" just shows that 1) you're ignorant of how things work in the real world,

      The point isn't about it being "for free" per se or not. It's that to get to the point of accepting a tax return online and reviewing its accuracy at a fundamental level, the IRS already has to (or at least, should be) correlate all the known information about the filer in the first place. Ie, you're already 99.9% of the way there of just automating the rest and filling in the spots calculated for exemptions, adjusted income, etc. So to specifically exempt this rather obvious option seems to be of specific design.

      and 2) you don't have a firm grasp on why barriers to government involvement in private industry exist (hint: anti-totalitarianism).

      Nope. See, the tax code is already pretty damn simple for the vast majority of people. That's precisely why the 1040-EZ form was created. It's the claim of anti-totalitarianism that's used to justify a way to "funnel gov't money to their buddies in private industry" when it misses the point that nothing about the above of *allowing* government involvement inherent leads to totalitarianism--inherently is the point since the whole tax code is a government construct which makes the whole idea of government totalitarianism against its own tax code is circular.

      Most people don't have a good grasp on 1) or 2) anyways so your comment doesn't surprise me. And if you're going to argue against 2), why not take it to the next level and just nationalize any industry that bridges the private/public gap - which is pretty much where we're going anyways.

      Because the private/public gap in the tax code exists (1) for people who actually need to utilize features of the tax code involving areas of dispute (figuring out if an item is an asset or a liability, if it's income or not, if its cost can be spread out over multiple years, etc) especially to ease all the fundamental concerns of businesses which deal in much larger dollar values and hence have to be either (a) a separate tax code for businesses (which is more or less the effect of different forms) or (b) simply no taxes on businesses (which is enough of a loophole that the tax code becomes meaningless) or (2) to prop up previous, pre-digital tax services that did all the above mentioned auto-calculate stuff that now can (and likely must) be trivial done by the IRS's online services anyways. And since a vast majority of people so heavily fall into (b), there's good reason why the IRS should be a directly available option.

      The false dichotomy that is this thread ignores the really obvious solution: don't have a tax code so damn complicated.

      That's pretty much impossible. Yes, the tax code has been made intentionally more complicated to the ends of social engineering, but putting that aside and you're still left with trying to define "income" in some fashion that can't be somehow fundamentally worked around without crippling the ability of businesses to function. The general solution for most people is obvious: they're employed by someone else and are paid wages, of which all details of such have to be reported to the IRS. Hence, they functionally already live in a bubble of an uncomplicated tax code.

      The right doesn't want that because they want to funnel gov't money to their buddies in private industry and the left doesn't want that because a population not dependent upon them is much harder to control. I haven't heard anyone say we need a complicated tax code to protect the free market and capitalism, but the Feds have a track record of using the tax code as a weapon of last resort against citizens it finds uncooperative

      Uh, no. The right uses the tax code to social engineer families to stay together, to reward ce

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  4. No, you can't by Kardos · · Score: 2

    With local TurboTax, you're just running closed source software. However, you can quarantine it such that it is unable to transmit anything over the tubes, and print the result, limiting the worst case scenario to incorrectly filled out forms.

    With online tax prep, you're sending all your details to some online server somewhere, and hoping that they only do the computations and wipe all the data. But they won't. It'll be stored so next year it'll be "half filled in already for your convenience". If you value your financial privacy, you would not use an online tax service.

    1. Re:No, you can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My take on this is to log in and provide hypothetical information under a pseudonym. I let it come up with whatever it will... then use that as a guide to hand fill in my official paper return.

      I highly resent being compelled to share my financial state of affairs with anyone, even the government, as much as they resent my prying into their affairs - such as how they are spending that which they extracted from me.

      Even more so, I resent being compelled to share personal private information to third parties.

      I get the idea the time is fast approaching that I will no longer be allowed to fill in my tax return by hand and be compelled to render the most intimate details of my life to organizations "working with" my government.

      My government has given ample evidence that they are not to be trusted. They give all indication of protecting the wolves from the sheep. The sheep have no business hiding when the wolves are hungry, but it's quite OK for the wolves to don sheep's clothing and rat them out. Any sheep that dares rat out a wolf will be dealt with severely ( Snowden ).

    2. Re:No, you can't by ArbitraryName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All of your tax information like your W-2 and various 1099s are provided to you by other people. People who keep that data on their servers. I'm not sure what sort of "financial privacy" you think you have, but the US tax system doesn't allow for much, if any.

    3. Re:No, you can't by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      "If you value your financial privacy" is such a loaded phrase.

      Risk. What's the worst that could happen? Well, your AGI can be used as a form of identity. So can your SSN. Your employment history as well is used as identity (you will be quizzed on this when applying for loans). You file any address changes and your current address, and your address history is used as identity (same deal).

      Probability of any of these being hijacked is roughly identical. It's low: compound trustworthiness of the organization being paramount to their ability to continue to do business with government regulations and auditing, and then consider that the primary threats are internal (insider threats are always the greater probability risk) and that these people are more likely to work for personal use than bulk sale (meaning you'd have to be one of a dozen or so picked out of tens or hundreds of millions of users at random).

      Severity is of course rather high.

      Overall, "if you value your financial privacy", you'll never get a job where your employer needs your social security number to file taxes. All of these applications using your SSN even if you don't get hired. I typically file my taxes before I get my W2, because I can calculate all of my information without it by looking at my last paycheck.

      The risk of using an online tax service is marginally higher than the risk of doing my taxes by hand or on home software. It's roughly identical to the risk of engaging with a tax accountant.

  5. Re:It's the NSA!!! by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I realize it's a joke, but legally the government outside the IRS isn't allowed to look at your tax returns. If you are a pimp or a drug dealer, you must file taxes with your correct occupation, however these taxes are not admissible as evidence against you, and law enforcement doesn't have access to it to point you out as a drug dealer.

    Theoretically anyway.

    There's been some funny side effects to the law, such as a prostitute who argued that her services weren't as much as the government claimed and she didn't owe so many back taxes. Congress passed a law that only the cost of goods sold count against revenue for dealing drugs (you can't include the cost of advertising) - however breast implants are a legitimate tax deduction as long as they're so large that they're purely for professional good and not personal enjoyment. And of course Al Capone going to jail on tax evasion, of all things.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  6. Local versions give more control by David_W · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A friend of mine made an interesting point to me a few years ago, and caused me to switch from online versions to the local ones you install on your system. With the local versions, you get to keep the data files. The online versions tend to purge from year-to-year, or at least after a couple years. If you want to refer to an older return, be it because you are being audited, or just to help figure out something on this year's forms, you'll have everything (worksheets, forms, etc.) with the local version, assuming you back up the software and data files. Online, you probably just have a PDF of whatever finally got submitted to the IRS, and that's it.

    So yeah, online versions work, but local ones give you more control.

    1. Re:Local versions give more control by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      You can file a FOIA request to the NSA. They make backups of your hard drive every month.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Local versions give more control by Kardos · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:Local versions give more control by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      A word of caution, though. For reasons that, no doubt, have to do with fundamental difficulties in computer science, the rapid changes in the storage of integers and trivial floats; rather than being money-grubbing shitweasels, vendors of standalone accounting/tax-prep packages have a... spotty... record when it comes to compatibility of older files with newer clients.

      I recently had the pleasure of migrating some antique version of Quicken to the present. The "Well, just open the old file with the new software" procedure simply wasn't supported, they'd changed formats and killed compatibility with their own older format. "Export" from the old one and "import" to the new one resulted in some alarming munging where somebody's penny-ante garden club ended up having assets in the range of $20 million, and $1.3 billion in liabilities.... This seemed improbable.

      The officially-recommended(but not supported, or guaranteed to produce accurate results) solution was to take the oldest file, install an intermediate version a few years newer than that file, open the file with the intermediate version, allow it to convert, check the results manually, do the same with a second intermediate version, and then finally take the output from the second intermediate version and import it into the current version.

      If you don't get to keep (in some non-fucked format) all the output and intermediate data, I'd trust an accounting package's data files only as long as I'd trust whatever mechanism (VM, whatever) I had cobbled together to keep that version of the accounting package running.

    4. Re:Local versions give more control by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      H&R Block's stuff prints out all the worksheets and such too, not just the final return. Not sure if others do it, but it's handy.

      1, you have all the data available
      2, you know how they calculated things

      Both very handy items to have around.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  7. Major targets for attackers by guanxi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For attackers trying to collect personal information -- for identity theft, for dirt, for spying -- can you imagine a better target than servers holding everyone's tax returns?

    Remember, security needs to make an attack more costly than the data is worth to the attacker. What responsibility / liability do vendors have regarding security for these servers? A breach may not cost them very much.

    I file using paper.

    1. Re:Major targets for attackers by guanxi · · Score: 2

      (Thanks. If you could post a source besides a random PDF (which many people on /. will hesitate to download) and highly partisan, anti-Obamacare RedState, it would help your point and be informative for the rest of us.)

    2. Re:Major targets for attackers by DaHat · · Score: 2

      OTOH, if the NSA can't protect it's data from rogue insiders ... maybe we should assume our tax returns were sold to the highest bidder long ago.

      Who says they need to be sold? As of late they've been doing some strategic (and illegal) leaking:

      http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/13/the-irs-admits-to-targeting-conservative-groups-but-were-they-also-leaking/
      http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/04/National-Organization-of-Marriage-Chairman-IRS-Leaked-Info-About-Group-s-Donors-to-Liberal-Groups
      http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/06/04/report-irs-leaked-conservative-groups-confidential-info-to-opponents/

      And yes... I did pick the partisan sites deliberately in this case.

  8. secure? by Kardos · · Score: 2

    I don't think that word means what you think it means. Reliable is probably what you're after.

  9. Re:Online is more secure now by JJJJust · · Score: 2

    I don't keep any tax data on my PC for security reasons. Had an iMac a while ago that blew up and it was a pain to get the drive out before trashing the thing. Easier just to keep the data in the tax cloud.

    The fact that you couldn't get the drive out isn't a security issue, it's an Apple engineering issue.

  10. As an H and R Block Tax Pro... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you know the Tax Code ok, or you actually have simple taxes*, software works fine.

    You have to be somewhat familiar with the tax code because there's no easy way for us to translate tax law into simple English, so it's very easy for people to misinterpret one of the numerous questions the software asks. If you do that you a) don't get a deduction you deserve or b) do take a deduction and get screwed if you get audited. I'm a bit out-of-practice, but the student debt/tuition credit/HOPE credit/etc. nexus of Feds giving people tax breaks for paying for college in particular is very easy to screw up.

    *Everyone I have ever met says they have simple taxes. Then they drop the annuity on the table and call it a W2. If you have any income besides interest on a bank account or a W2 you do not have a tax form H and R Block defines as "simple." You really need to read the paperwork that you are sent because many people take a chintzy $350 job helping their cousin cater a banquet, get a 1099, and are then surprised that I am legally required to put that on a Schedule SE and a Schedule C or C-EZ attached to a full 1040, and by the time you pay me for all those forms AND the self-employment tax you're losing money. The really big numbers at the top will tell you exactly what form it is. They'll be 1098, 1099, or W2.

    1. Re:As an H and R Block Tax Pro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The official policy of the IRS is that if you follow the advice of an IRS employee and that advice is incorrect, you are at fault.

  11. Re:It's the NSA!!! by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Informative

    but legally the government outside the IRS isn't allowed to look at your tax returns

    Unless you're buying health insurance in one of the new Obamacare exchanges. Or applying for a FHA mortgage. Or you happen to be the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation. Your State Government can access it too, if they have an income tax and wish to match up your State return to the Federal one. The IRS also shares returns with SSA.

    There's also a multitude of Federal and State agencies that can access your tax account, if not your actual returns. The Department of State will check with the IRS before they issue or renew a passport, for the purpose of collecting foreign income taxes and denying passports to serious tax scofflaws. Child support enforcement agencies can seize refunds, so they've got a mechanism of communication with the IRS too.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  12. Re:Online is more secure now by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    You are going about the secure data destruction business all wrong... Once the computer is toast, anything between you and the platters is just 'collateral damage'. A rifle, angle grinder, or cutting torch will go right through an iMac without much difficulty.

  13. TaxAct by bhlowe · · Score: 2

    I've been using TaxAct.com for 4+ years for personal taxes and it is fantastic. Super cheap and reliable.. All information from previous years is stored on their servers so each year it gets easier to file. Unlike healthcare.gov, I trust their site, it works, is easy to use, cheaper than anything else, and they didn't the taxpayers a half billion dollars on the rollout.

  14. Re:It's the NSA!!! by JJJJust · · Score: 4, Informative

    I realize it's a joke, but legally the government outside the IRS isn't allowed to look at your tax returns. If you are a pimp or a drug dealer, you must file taxes with your correct occupation, however these taxes are not admissible as evidence against you, and law enforcement doesn't have access to it to point you out as a drug dealer.

    Theoretically anyway.

    I don't buy this.

    Title 26, United States Code, Section 6103 states:

    (i) Disclosure to Federal officers or employees for administration of Federal laws not relating to tax administration
    (1) Disclosure of returns and return information for use in criminal investigations
    (A) In general
    Except as provided in paragraph (6), any return or return information with respect to any specified taxable period or periods shall, pursuant to and upon the grant of an ex parte order by a Federal district court judge or magistrate judge under subparagraph (B), be open (but only to the extent necessary as provided in such order) to inspection by, or disclosure to, officers and employees of any Federal agency who are personally and directly engaged in—
    (i) preparation for any judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to the enforcement of a specifically designated Federal criminal statute (not involving tax administration) to which the United States or such agency is or may be a party,
    (ii) any investigation which may result in such a proceeding, or
    (iii) any Federal grand jury proceeding pertaining to enforcement of such a criminal statute to which the United States or such agency is or may be a party,
    solely for the use of such officers and employees in such preparation, investigation, or grand jury proceeding.

    (4) Use of certain disclosed returns and return information in judicial or administrative proceedings
    (A) Returns and taxpayer return information
    Except as provided in subparagraph (C), any return or taxpayer return information obtained under paragraph (1) or (7)(C) may be disclosed in any judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to enforcement of a specifically designated Federal criminal statute or related civil forfeiture (not involving tax administration) to which the United States or a Federal agency is a party—
    (i) if the court finds that such return or taxpayer return information is probative of a matter in issue relevant in establishing the commission of a crime or the guilt or liability of a party, or
    (ii) to the extent required by order of the court pursuant to section 3500 of title 18, United States Code, or rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

  15. go by nten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have heard circumstances like this multiple times. It really bothers me that we have invented a tax code that is on par with the game "go" as far as its ability to be computerized. There are extremely talented individuals making a living interpreting our tax code. Those same people could be doing something far more useful to society than they are now, but we have created an entire industry that sucks them away from more useful endeavors by cobbling together a tax code that is a mashup of bribes to interest groups, bribes to voters, authoritarian interference with our individual lives, and a glass ceiling protecting the one percent. If any highschool graduate can't just sit down with a calculator and pay the *exact* amount owed, we have done something wrong.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
    1. Re:go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not an accident that tax codes are as complicated as they are. My company (one of the two mentioned) spends a ton lobbying Congress to keep the tax laws complicated enough that people cannot reasonably do it with pen and paper without missing something or spending far too long doing it. Yet they don't want to make it so complex that you have to seek professional help. It's a tricky balancing act and it tends to tip towards being too complex because, in that case, they can then direct you to their CPAs that use their expensive tax product and charge a referral fee on top of that. From the CPA perspective, the referral comes with a ton of the information already entered into the system, so they can complete more returns. I find it funny that I've had conversations with the CEO where he talks about how excited he is that his company can so radically simplify the tax experience with software while, at the same time, he's employing lobbyists to make the tax software necessary in the first place.

      However even if there weren't intentional efforts to complicate the tax code, it would still be a lot more complex that you want it to be. Just like computer code that starts off elegant and simple and, through bug fixes, optimizations and new features becomes a tangled web of spaghetti code, the tax code will get more and more changes to close loopholes (bugs) and add new taxes/credits for various things (features). And business tax codes are even worse.

      I'd be more upset about it if I didn't now have a ton of stock in a company that benefits from making the process simple for those willing to fork over ~$100 each year. That, and we get the software for free :-)

    2. Re:go by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

      I am not sure what you are disagree about? Is it about the tax code should be complex? Or the country (U.S.) should make tax laws simply?

      To me, the GP is talking about the company he is working for. The company is attempt to make money by lobbying the tax code to be very complex. As a result, laymen would need to find a way to file taxes -- hire a CPA or use tax software. The company will earn more revenue from people buying its software. Is it bad to make tax code more complex? I think it is. However, there is no agreement or disagreement in what they are doing because to me it has only one answer -- it is bad (exploitation of the system).

  16. Esq. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    You guys are still paying taxes? Suckers...

    Last year, I declared my basement the Sovereign Kingdom of Ratzistan, and myself the Lord High Exalted Mystic Ruler for Life. Not only will I not be paying taxes any more, but I've just sent the US Government a bill for $100,000 for the easement of my front door where they insist on putting their so-called "mail" and "restraining orders" and such. I talked to a lawyer that I met on Craig's List and he says I got a great case and instead of taking a percentage, he charged me a flat fee of $1200 to set me up with all the proper documents. They look really nice, too with a gold foil trim and big official seal.

    You laugh now, but when I get that $100,000 (well, it'll be $98,800, after I pay back the nice Italian guy at the bar who lent me the $1200 for the lawyer), I'm gonna buy myself a sweet gaming rig and drop the rest on the Broncos to win the Super Bowl. Then we'll see who's laughing.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  17. Just use IRS.gov by students · · Score: 2

    figure out just how much they owe the country, without reading the tens of thousands of pages of IRS forms guidance.

    I have never found it challenging to file my taxes using just the information from IRS.gov. IRS documents usually explain things very well.

  18. Re:I Use Excel To Model The Form 1040 by ktappe · · Score: 2

    Anyone who pays for tax software is probably an idiot.

    Or doesn't know how to program. Not saying I'm one of those, but there is a place in this world for nurses and cooks and carpenters who know their trades quite well but not how to construct an algorithm in a computer.

    Or were you trolling?

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  19. Re:Captive markets and planned obsolescence by X0563511 · · Score: 2

    Tax code changes year to year. It would have been irresponsible to allow you to do that.

    That said, it sure was awfully nice that they waited until the end of the process to tell you that...

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  20. In other coutries... by Dareth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I heard that in other countries the government calculates the taxes and sends a bill. How can it make sense that the government that makes the rules leaves it to the people to figure out what/if they owe and only look at it after the fact? How does that make any sense at all?

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  21. TaxAct by wytcld · · Score: 2

    I use TaxAct too. Not the online version, but the standalone. However the first year I used it I filed online through them after preparing it locally. The following year I went to file online again and found someone else had beaten me to it. Someone who had information that could only have been obtained from access to my prior year's return. Took me most of a year and help from a senator's office to straighten it out.

    Now, where did the perp get access? The laptop that I only boot into Windows once a year to do taxes, and then only on a well-firewalled home network (I'm a network engineer, I have confidence in my work here)? From the IRS itself (which, if it were that vulnerable, should lead to far more identity theft even than what we see now)? Or from 2nd Story Software? Odds are it's 2nd Story Software which was compromised somehow. Since then I still use their product, but only file on paper. So this isn't a caution about just preparing returns online. Filing online is similarly dangerous.

    Coincidentally, that same year I found a place where they misinterpreted state tax code. Confirmed that with my state's tax office. Contacted 2nd Story about it. Their response was, "We have expert advisors in every state. We trust them over your state's tax office." Fortunately returns are coded by which tax software is used, and the state office assured me they could spot and correct the mistake for all those using TaxAct, now that they knew to look for it.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  22. Re:I Use Excel To Model The Form 1040 by airdweller · · Score: 2

    "Anyone who pays for tax software is probably an idiot."
    I guess you do your own dental cleaning, oil changes, plumbing, etc? You'd be an idiot otherwise, right?