Slashdot Mirror


Why Scott Adams Wished Death On His Dad

theodp writes " I hope my father dies soon," Dilbert creator Scott Adams wrote Saturday in a frustrated, angry, and poignant blog post. 'My father, age 86, is on the final approach to the long dirt nap (to use his own phrase). His mind is 98% gone, and all he has left is hours or possibly months of hideous unpleasantness in a hospital bed. I'll spare you the details, but it's as close to a living Hell as you can get. If my dad were a cat, we would have put him to sleep long ago. And not once would we have looked back and thought too soon. Because it's not too soon. It's far too late. His smallish estate pays about $8,000 per month to keep him in this state of perpetual suffering. Rarely has money been so poorly spent. I'd like to proactively end his suffering and let him go out with some dignity. But my government says I can't make that decision. Neither can his doctors. So, for all practical purposes, the government is torturing my father until he dies.' Adams also had harsh words for those who would oppose assisted suicide, 'I don't want anyone to misconstrue this post as satire or exaggeration. So I'll reiterate. If you have acted, or plan to act, in a way that keeps doctor-assisted suicide illegal, I see you as an accomplice in torturing my father, and perhaps me as well someday. I want you to die a painful death, and soon. And I'd be happy to tell you the same thing to your face.' His father passed a few hours after Adams wrote his screed. Challenged later by the SF Chronicle's Debra J. Saunders, an opponent of assisted suicide, Adams stood firm on his earlier words. So, can Adams succeed in convincing the U.S. where Dr. Jack failed?"

32 of 961 comments (clear)

  1. Should be legal, with caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is one of those things were I think it should be legal (free will) but only if the person left instructions stating so in their will. "I, So and So, being of sound mind, state that if I'm ever in a coma with less than 1% chance of coming out of it (by the doctor's judgements) do so hereby state that I wish to be 'put down'" or some such.

    1. Re:Should be legal, with caveat by Score+Whore · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not about comas. It's about terminal illnesses where there is no chance of recovery and the only thing for the patient and family to look forward to are pain, loss of dignity, loss of autonomy, and significant emotional, personal and financial burdens. Assisted, end of life suicide already legal in Washington and Oregon and some parts of Europe.

    2. Re:Should be legal, with caveat by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep. $8,000 a month to watch somebody die slowly, painfully and inevitably. When the person being kept alive doesn't want it.

      After a year of watching this person's misery, they die and you're left with a bill you might never be able to pay off.

      They dies. Your life is in ruins. The mental scars of watching it for a year are far worse than if you just said goodbye and did it. Does that make sense to anybody at all?

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Should be legal, with caveat by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you get to starve to death or dehydrate.
      Excuse me if I don't consider death by organ failure over several days as "quickly". I don't think anyone would call that humane.

      We would put down a dog in that condition. Not let it starve or die by dehydration.

    4. Re:Should be legal, with caveat by sconeu · · Score: 5, Informative

      My wife died of ALS, and while we weren't bankrupted (thank heavens), the stress on both of us was hell.

      She had a DNR, and a no-vent order written in advance. When she was admitted for pneumonia, she was lucky that her doctor understood that it was essentially over, and ordered a morphine drip.

      She was essentially out of it, and confirming the DNR/no-vent was the hardest thing I have ever done in my entire life. I still haven't completely forgiven myself.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:Should be legal, with caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I still haven't completely forgiven myself.

      You should. Nobody is God, all we can do is try to make the right decisions, each and every day. And being human, we'll never get it 100% right. If what you did you did because you think its what she wanted, then you did right.

    6. Re:Should be legal, with caveat by DroolTwist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With enough morphine, it feels really good.

      I'm assuming you are trying to be funny. Guess what. You aren't (I realize I'm overly sensitive due to what we went through/witnessed; I am not trying to be a dick to you with that statement).

      Last Christmas I watched my mother (and my aunt shortly after) go through this. I watched her basically starve/dehydrate to death. No amount of pain medicine, that doesn't knock you out anyway, is enough to overcome everything associated with dying of cancer/dehydration/starvation.

      People who are against assisted suicide think that what she went through was 'humane?' Fuck them. We'll see if they have this same opinion once one of their close relatives goes through this.

      Before I die, assuming I know it will be coming soon, I will be moving somewhere where it is legal.

  2. Well, isn't this nice by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I'm okay with any citizen who opposes doctor-assisted suicide on moral or practical grounds. But if you have acted on that thought, such as basing a vote on it, I would like you to die a slow, horrible death too."

    "If you're a politician who has ever voted against doctor-assisted suicide, or you would vote against it in the future, I hate your fucking guts and I would like you to die a long, horrible death. I would be happy to kill you personally and watch you bleed out."

    I'll attribute most of this to personal pain... but seriously, Scott needs to dial it back a notch. When you go into threats of killing someone, your political discourse has gone way too far.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Well, isn't this nice by bistromath007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, he really doesn't. This is exactly the kind of political discourse our nation has desperately needed for several decades. Can you think of a practical way to get billionaires to listen to people other than pointing guns at them?

    2. Re:Well, isn't this nice by Copid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I get the guys in pain, that his dad is in pain but if his mind is "98%" gone as he says then his dad is suffering less than he is. If his dad had a living will requesting to not be left on life support than it likely wouldn't be an issue. There are legal ways around assisted suicide, it just seems Scott would rather ignore them and point fingers like every other douche on the planet.

      Since we're using a person's vocation to decide whether or not their opinion is valid, what do you do for a living?

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    3. Re:Well, isn't this nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For the record, I believe euthanasia laws need modernized. But wishing mass deaths on people who don't share your views is just wrong.

      I personally think he went overboard too, but it is not exactly the same as 'not sharing your views'. Adams is making the point that it is _not_ an opposing viewpoint, it is actively harming other people. Something I agree with. I do not equate euthanesia opponents to torturers, but for the sake of argument: we would not let someone get away with torturing helpless people*, just because their view is that it is perfectly ok to do so. And yes, people do get punished, put in to jail or even put to death because their 'views' are unacceptable to civilized society.

      * Yes... I realize the irony there when it comes to the US treatment of certain terror suspects.

    4. Re:Well, isn't this nice by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've clearly never been around someone in the final stages of dementia.
      I can tell you this, I'll be checking out before I get to that point.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Well, isn't this nice by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Opposing views, sure. But is wishing a painful death on those causing your father an awful death wrong? That the connection is just "informational" rather than physical is a rhetorical conceit.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    6. Re:Well, isn't this nice by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My problem with this 'debate' is the hand-wringing by unaffected parties, and the inevitable illogical leap that next we'll be killing the old and infirm because they're inconvenient.

      Nobody is saying we're going to kill you, and nobody is suggesting we make this easy or something hospital staff can decide when they get tired of changing your sheets.

      But the people screeching the loudest about ensuring that other people do not have the right to choose their own death with dignity aren't even affected by it.

      If I was terminally ill, and would rather die at a time of my own choosing, that should be my right. It should not be someone else's right to prevent this from happening based on their moral objections to it -- because it's none of their fucking business.

      Usually when I hear someone fighting against doctor assisted suicide, they're doing it on purely religious grounds and expect the rest of us to care. It's usually just a much of moralizing old bitties who have said "killing anyone is bad, so you have to suffer, and if we let you die by your own choice next it will be us". I rank it right up there with someone trying to pass laws which define my morality and which has nothing to do with them.

      I've known a few people who have died after the long, protracted palliative care which didn't serve any purpose but to prolong suffering and keep up the pretense it's a better option than dying.

      And, I must confess, I share some of the same rage as Adams does on this. What your religion tells you about how you want to die has nothing at all to do with if I want to die in a long drawn-out process that serves no purpose. So I'm of the opinion that you don't get a vote about how/if I get to choose to die with some dignity.

      And if you want a vote in that, my vote is that you should also die a long and horrible death.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Well, isn't this nice by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Well, he's a comic creator, not a doctor, philosopher or politician. He's somewhere up there with
      > Janitor or Central Park Mime in my book. Why he expects me to take what he says seriously is
      > quite curious.

      Even more curious is why I would take seriously the opinion of someone who so easily dismisses the opinions of others based on their job title.

      How about this....he is a man who has watched his father deteriorate and come to the brink of death while his own estate is pissed away for no reason but to keep him in this state longer. Sounds like a fucking expert in the topic at hand to me.

      > I get the guys in pain, that his dad is in pain but if his mind is "98%" gone as he says then
      > his dad is suffering less than he is.

      And likely he is. His dad likely isn't suffering at all anymore, his dad is already gone. The man he knew and loved and who raised him....doesn't even exist. All that is left is lump of living tissue being kept alive for the purpose of maintaining the legal fiction of a living man.

      The real problem here is the utter insufficiency in determining when a person is really alive or dead. Just because we can keep a hunk of meat alive doesn't mean we can keep a person alive. The person can be gone long before the meat starts to rot.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    8. Re:Well, isn't this nice by tgd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've clearly never been around someone in the final stages of dementia.
      I can tell you this, I'll be checking out before I get to that point.

      That is YOUR own choice. You can do what you want with your life.
      What you cannot do, and cannot expect is laws that enable other people to kill you legally.
      There is a world of difference between these 2 alternatives.

      Suicide is illegal, as well. So, really, there isn't. The cold hard legal fact is, you do not have a choice. You suffer until you die naturally. And, odds are even if it was legal to kill yourself, at that point you'd be unable to. So you will suffer until that suffering finally ends.

      The fucked up thing about it, is because of some bizarre more that was taught to people during impressionable periods of their life, they're completely unable to see the sheer inhumanity of guaranteeing that nearly every living person will suffer needlessly before they die.

      Its probably good you posted as an AC, because your position is so blatantly cruel and moronic, having even your virtual identity associated with it should be embarrassing to you.

    9. Re:Well, isn't this nice by miltonw · · Score: 5, Informative

      Scott Adams did not "threaten to kill someone". Read what he wrote. He only wished that those who actively oppose assisted suicide be condemned to experience the same agony and suffering they have imposed on others. Actually, I think that's probably exactly what's going to happen for some of them.

    10. Re:Well, isn't this nice by N0Man74 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, then tell us why the death penalty closely corresponds with the bible belt?

      Because without a death penalty, Christianity wouldn't exist.

    11. Re:Well, isn't this nice by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jesus, that was funny! :-)

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    12. Re:Well, isn't this nice by boskone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thnk he underreacted.

      You are using the thread of prison, loss of freedom and potential death, to tell me my loved one must lie in pain for an indeterminate amount of time. Why don't you (the general you, not this poster specifically) statists go do something else and meddle with your own affairs?

  3. Kill pact by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In that situation, I'll kill my wife or she will kill me. Otherwise I wouldn't have married her.

    I am not sure what she'll do after but I am positive I'll commit suicide after killing her.

    I've lived something close to what Mr. Adams describes and I now need such certainties to live in peace.

    1. Re:Kill pact by umafuckit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, if that's your outlook on life/marriage I feel really sorry for your wife.

      Then you totally don't get it. It sounds like the poster you're responding to has an unconditionally loving and trusting relationship with his wife. They are both very lucky.

  4. Surrogate decisionmaking by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For the most part, while there are exceptions, active suicide is almost unnecessary for someone in a grossly debilitated state. As a physician, I both have a living will and my family is well-informed that if I ever lose the ability to function mentally, in a way that is not reversible, I am not to receive ANY life-prolonging treatment. That means no artificial hydration, no feeding, and no antibiotics. Many of my physician colleagues have made similar arrangements. That's why MDs are the group in the population with the lowest end-of-life cost. While a surrogate or healthcare proxy may not make a decision to end a life, they are certainly within their rights to do the abovementioned, unless a person's living will specifically forbids it. In general, this means a person will pass away within days. For the most part it allows the family time to fly in, and make peace with the inevitable.

    1. Re:Surrogate decisionmaking by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you're making a lot of assumptions that are fundamentally false by projecting your imagination into a situation that is very different.
      People with mental status that is sufficiently compromised to fall under the category I am describing are not really able to feel hunger the way we do. Actually, starvation due to decreased drive to eat is one of the primary mechanisms of end-stage dementia.
      Also, appropriate end-of-life care within the palliative setting involves very aggressive pain control.
      At no point should anyone in hospice care die in pain.

  5. ahm. by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Saunders's response was rather confusing, esp the closing "Me, I don't want to live in a world where one group of people decides when another group should die."

    I guess it is not oppression as long as the choice you want is the one being mandated.

  6. Not wishing death on his father by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was wishing that his father would be out of misery and is a proponent of assisted suicide. He saw his father suffer and become little more of a shell. The "wish" was as much for himself as for his father.

    And, he's right...if it were an animal, we'd have "put it to sleep" to ease its suffering.

    We get so caught up on religious dogma and how this would be murder or suicide that we forget the person is a human being being forced to live an existence they wouldn't choose for themselves.

    The other week, my mother's partner or 13 years suffered a stroke and was on life support. Thankfully, in our state, they support the concept of a living will - it gave her the authorization to take him off of life support. She waited until confirmation by multiple doctors on his prognosis. It was difficult. He has zero higher brain function and was being kept alive artificially with zero probability of recovery. He was 86. She authorized the removal of the machines and feeding tubes...just IV and pain meds (seems he was experiencing pain at some level). In 3 days, he passed peacefully.

    My mother is a religious and moral person - but, she feels it morally wrong to keep someone in that state, given their expressed wishes prior, alive for the sake of keeping them alive. If he had a soul, it passed when his brain function ceased. His body was just a shell. And, she felt he was in a better place.

  7. oregon has assistant suicide by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oregon has legal assistant suicide, the first in the nation to have these laws. You can plan and die peacefully in Oregon with your choice of a death cocktail.

  8. That's why by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have 10 grams of coke hidden in my house. My dad suffered tremendously during his last weeks of life. I've seen it with my own eyes. If I'm ever in that situation, I've instructed my family to overdose me with the coke. They'll have plausible deniability (I was a junkie who wanted his dose). As for me, they say the first hit is better than an orgasm, and with 10 g, it'd also be my last, so I'd go in style.

    Of course, if I'm conscious and able to, I'll do the coke myself if I have to...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  9. My thoughts are with him by kaizendojo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You don't know until you have gone through this yourself. I just did - twice within months, once for my Mother who died in home hospice and again for my Father about 5 months after she passed. I went through it alone, even though a sibling lived only 2 miles away from them. You can't imagine watching someone you love, someone you owe your whole world to waste away in this fashion. I was lucky enough that both were cognitive right up until the end; for me it was the only saving grace in all this that I could at least still communicate and interact with them up in until a day or two before each passed. I can't fathom the pain Adams went through in his situation. I understand fully why he said what he did and where it came from. To those who think they know better, be careful becuase karma has a way of administring harsh lessons of reality.

  10. y name is... by NixieBunny · · Score: 5, Funny

    My name is Scott Adams. You didn't kill my father. Prepare to die.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
  11. Re:Legal right to suicide by ewieling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think if it this way: Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Euthanasia is a permanent solution to a permanent problem.

    --
    I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
  12. Re:Not really true... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The difference between humans and animals is that doctors have industrial-strength pain-killers they will administer to humans. No matter how excruciating the pain, doctors can keep you drugged into a dream world, and can similarly keep you entirely unconscious for an indefinite period. If you could choose your method of departure, being drugged out of your mind on coke would be the near the top of most people's lists, so morphine or similar isn't a bad alternative.

    Not so. My grandfather had an interesting thing happen, where his intestine started dying by inches. They tried excising the dying bits, but the rest kept dying too. So, palliative care.

    They were quite frank about the fact that he was in enough pain that no painkiller they had would work on him. He was drugged into utter unconsciousness, yet still his face was spasming with pain. Yet when I suggested maybe they just up the dose, they said 'Any more would kill him.' 'Well, doctor,' I said, 'what are his chances?' 'None,' they said. 'He will die within a week. There's nothing we can do.' 'Exactly,' I said. And they looked at me like I was a monster, while they did everything they could to prolong his death. Not his life, his death.

    Yet if I treated my dog that way, I'd be up on animal cruelty charges.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.