Slashdot Mirror


Snowden Document Says Dutch Secret Service Hacks Internet Forums

vikingpower writes "In the ever-longer wake of the NSA scandal, much-respected Dutch newspaper NRC today reveals, in English, as mandated by the gravity of the occasion, that the Dutch secret service, the AIVD, hacks internet forums. And yes, that is gross misconduct against Dutch law. The service, whose headquarters are in Zoetermeer, did not yet comment upon the divulgence of the document from Edward Snowden's collection. Incensed Dutch parliamentarians are calling for an enquiry."

162 comments

  1. There's only two things I hate in this world... by Sigvatr · · Score: 3, Funny

    People who are intolerant of other people's cultures, and the Dutch

    1. Re:There's only two things I hate in this world... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1
      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:There's only two things I hate in this world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, political reality today is so close to parody that it is sometimes difficult to notice the difference.

    3. Re:There's only two things I hate in this world... by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      True and Insightful! Dutch here btw.

    4. Re:There's only two things I hate in this world... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Well, technically it is wooshy on the slim chance that you consider Dutch a culture.
      I needed to listen to an awful lot of techno EPs and to forget about a lot of paintings, to be able to do that myself.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    5. Re:There's only two things I hate in this world... by Teun · · Score: 1

      Rod Stewart knew it too:
      The big bosomed lady with the Dutch accent / who tried to change my point of view / Her ad lib lines were well rehearsed / but my heart cried out for you /

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    6. Re:There's only two things I hate in this world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dutch Wife!

  2. Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surprise! Every govt has an intelligence service and every intelligence service spends at least part of its time spying on its own citizens. If this is news to you, then you will surely be traumatized when you find out that every country tortures people during wars and most torture a few during times of peace. Who do you think Lady GaGa sells most of her recordings to?

  3. Do you really believe the politicians ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    Last sentence of the TFA:

    Incensed Dutch parliamentarians are calling for an enquiry

    Are the politicians really incensed ?

    Aww ...

    Please don't disappoint me.

    Please don't tell me that the Dutch politicians are all angels !!

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Do you really believe the politicians ? by mpol · · Score: 2

      It's just politics. None of the politicians came across as serious when the first revelations of Snowden came out. Only the SP wanted to ask questions to Snowden directly, but he definitely won't fly to Holland :).
      When it comes to this situation, there's no real party you can trust.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
  4. Re:Language? by PimpBot · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Dutch normally speak Dutch, because, well, it's their native tongue. Dutch itself is pretty close to German, but neither are world-popular language. As such, most people in the Netherlands speak English as well, because they're a hub of business. Publishing this in English ensures it's widely readable to the rest of the world.

  5. Color me surprised. by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because so many governments do it, it doesn't make it any more right. Quite the contrary. This revelation only removes "the Moral High Ground" from another nation's people.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Color me surprised. by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      I'm kind of shocked that people are so shocked. It's like they thought they had privacy or something. Amazing how many people are waking up to the fact they were living in a fantasy world.

    2. Re:Color me surprised. by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of shocked that people are so shocked.

      Who's shocked? People in places such as this, or 'normal' people? If the latter, you shouldn't be shocked; they've always been unintelligent.

    3. Re:Color me surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "This revelation only removes "the Moral High Ground" from another nation's people."

      considering that the Dutch government is actually angry about this, and not defending it like the US government is, no I do not at all think this removes the moral high ground.

    4. Re:Color me surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight. Before all this revelations, people who talked about espionage like this where named tinfoils and laughed upon. And now after these revelations people who complain are told that they are idiots since everyone always knew that this was going on.

      Yeah, that makes perfect sense...

    5. Re:Color me surprised. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's shocked that some number of "normal" people are paying attention?

    6. Re:Color me surprised. by khallow · · Score: 1

      considering that the Dutch government is actually angry about this

      It's probably more a credit to the Dutch people than their government.

    7. Re:Color me surprised. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      I do not know to a five nines degree of causality that being smarter makes you more jaded. Old age will do it too, but I suspect the loss of naivete comes quicker to the better thinkers. And yes, as this is the Holiday Inn Express of websites, I will stipulate that posting on /. does indeed make you smarter.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    8. Re:Color me surprised. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      We are shocked by the incredibly broad scope. We are shocked by the brazen 'Yes we are spying on all of you, what are you going to do about it?'.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:Color me surprised. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      In parts of the world you need a real court document or use bureaucrats that have legal clearance.
      The NSA, DEA "parallel construction" telco idea can have many legal issues that most countries have faced or know never to get pulled into again.
      Every top criminal can pay for insights into the domestic operation/tech policy formation of surveillance via their police, lawyers, press, judicial contacts.
      They will never be caught or can bribe/counter most gov efforts.
      Most countries understand that a defendant in court might just have a good lawyer and their own press/police friends at some point.
      After that first legal finding with press support that a conviction was unsound due to lies in court by gov staff/contractors/tech expert witnesses - law reform efforts move to look at many other convictions by the same gov teams.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:Color me surprised. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      This, however, answered a question I had: the NSA probably has access to half the forums in the world without needing any kind of attack. I was wondering if other services were happy to ask for NSA help or tried to independently get the information they needed.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    11. Re:Color me surprised. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I wonder what people thought intelligence gathering agencies did. I wonder what they thought all those antenna farms the NSA built decades ago were for. This stuff has been mentioned for ages. Hoover was tapping phones back in the 50's and 60's of so called "radicals" and that was pretty much common knowledge. Did people think things were improving? Anyone who thought they could pick up a phone and have a private conversation have been deluding themselves for many, many years.

    12. Re:Color me surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would they be angry? their spying project wasnt connected to them personally, so now they get to perform on stage, demonstrating their "anger" and racking up political points.

    13. Re:Color me surprised. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of shocked that people are so shocked. It's like they thought they had privacy or something. Amazing how many people are waking up to the fact they were living in a fantasy world.

      Yeah, it's like people are surprised that the actions they do in public (i.e., anything you do on the Internet) actually can be watched, observed and noticed by people.

      I mean, if you want to keep something private, or want some privacy, you keep that stuff under wraps. You don't go post it online or anything where other people have access to it. Encryption works, to a point, but the best way to keep something from being revealed to anyone is to keep it to yourself.

      The fact that some people have put up marketing things like "privacy controls" really doesn't change things - all Facebook has done is shown how ephemeral those settings are. The old saying of "don't put anything online you don't want to see in the New York Times tomorrow" still applies like it has for decades. (Though, I suppose a more modern variant is Google News or something).

    14. Re:Color me surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be +5, at least.

  6. Re:Huh? What? by ThreeKelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It might not be news, but it is still stuff that matters!

    I want the world I live in to be a good place, not a place where, as you put it, people are tortured and spied upon. I want to be able to sleep at night, knowing that my government works for basic human rights, including the right to privacy and the right to not be tortured in some prison camp!

    The more the wrongdoings of the governments of the west are exposed, the easier it is to stand up against them using non-violent means like voting and demonstrating. So, don't come here and tell me that it isn't in the category news and/or stuff that matters. I for one don't accept the world I live in, and I want to change it for the better.

  7. Re:Language? by plankrwf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do not worry, there is a dutch version as well: http://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2013/11/30/aivd-hackt-internetfora-tegen-wet-in/

  8. Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sick of this "Everyone does it!".

    Child trafficking is rampant.

    So it's OK if I do it?

    1. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Child trafficking is rampant.

      So it's OK if I do it?

      Diamonds are everywhere! Therefore, it is okay for me to steal diamonds?

      That is the problem with arguments without numbers -- it is possible for something to be "rampant" (as in a big problem for society) while still "minuscule" (as in you probably don't do it, or anyone that you know).

    2. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sick of this "Everyone does it!".

      Child trafficking is rampant.

      So it's OK if I do it?

      Do you work for the government's Child Trafficking Logistics Agency?

      That's where the "everyone does it" argument comes from. They're spies, it's their fucking job to spy on potential hostiles and to ignore the law while doing it.

      captcha: sexist. This post contains the word "fucking" so it is sexist..

    3. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So if someone employs the GP to do child trafficking, it's alright?

      It's his job!

    4. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's where the "everyone does it" argument comes from.

      Popularity is not a justification. "Everyone does it" is not a justification.

    5. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Diamonds are everywhere! "

      Indeed they are! Therefore you can have diamonds near you!

      And if they aren't owned, you cannot steal them. If they are already owned, then it would be wrong to steal them, no matter how many there are.

      Sorry, your "analogy" sucks.

      If you'd said "Diamond thieves are rampant, is it OK if I steal diamonds?" then your analogy would be correct.

    6. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      too bad the contracts made by the countries didn't at least on paper include a "oh by the way we have this list of people who's crimes we will not investigate" clause.

      what it will lead to eventually is that all countries just stop honoring any hacker extradition requests. why? because every other country is doing likewise.

      by the way at least one country classified at least in speeches such activities as war(but then again that country already declared several wars on abstract ideas). and potential hostiles? give me a fucking break, everyone is a potential hostile.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Child trafficking is rampant.

      So it's OK if I do it?

      Only if you work for the government. The CIA routinely smuggles drugs into the USA to fund their "black ops" activities, the FBI routinely smuggles child porn into the USA in order to "tempt" people. Local cops routinely perjure themselves in traffic court to get ticket revenue for the city. Last I heard these activities are supposed to be illegal for EVERYONE, but if you work for the government the "justice" department looks the other way.

    8. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart "steals" from us, so it's okay for me to steal from Walmart!

    9. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, only that those you thought were the good guys aren't. There is no black or white, only shades of grey--except those lighter shades were because someone cleaned them. There are no good guys, only those of more or less badness.

      As I said above, welcome to the REAL world, this prison planet, where what you thought was a safe place to run turns out not to be: in the 21st century, there is nowhere left to hide. Sucks, doesn't it?

    10. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Just following orders.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    11. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      The problem with the UK and UK (NSA, GCHQ) weakened telco crypto is now we are seeing the '"Everyone does it!"" issues - they all have the codes to use in a domestic setting.
      When the local staff exit the gov security services (misconduct or lured by private sector cash flow) they take the gov level telco codes/skills with them to the highest bidder (other govs, faiths, firms, mercenaries).
      Weak US and UK encryption 'sold' to the world is junk at an international and domestic level.
      You really want to ensure bank, medical, gov, school, court, legal, utility, telco records are used used by law enforcement by a court or use by a bureaucrat in your country - not just random person with the skills and a task.
      With ex staff, the many gov friends of the US/UK, their contractors and their new private sector jobs - Everyone sees it all.
      From legal gov work to not legal gov work to contractors with the cash - Thanks to Snowden the issues surrounding weakened telco crypto is now getting wider press attention.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    12. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      but if you work for the government the "justice" department looks the other way.

      You spelled it wrong. It's a common mistake and even book publishers do it.

      It is actually spelled "Just us" department. Justice implies something completely different then what normally happens where just us hits the nail on the head.

    13. Re: Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you steal from walmart, you are just levelling the playing pitch. For extra points , but a walmart down.

    14. Re:Does that make it right? No? Then SO WHAT? by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      YES!

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
  9. Now! THIS Is Too Far! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, it wasn't good when the NSA was spying, the GCHQ revelations made the situation worse. Australian spying was pretty bad too.

    But, Dutch internet spying is taking it all just too far. This is the tipping point, the world's civilian populace will surely rise up against Dutch spying!

    Ooh The Voice(wost show ever) is on!

    1. Re:Now! THIS Is Too Far! by Teun · · Score: 1
      The Dutch secret services are tiny compared to those in the UK and US.

      It's a known fact they sometimes (regularly?) get donations from their US cousins to set up projects that are of mutual interest.
      So far I see no problems, but Dutch privacy law is an entirely different beast to US privacy law (or the lack thereof), we do have guarantees re. privacy and consider it important to protect them.

      What I do find of interest is the AMS-IX or Amsterdam Internet Exchange, it would be a great point for tapping...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  10. /. and mysql? by plankrwf · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The real question is, of course, if Slashdot is using mySQL as well.

    (Don't bother: if you did not read the article, you will not understand the comment)

    1. Re:/. and mysql? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      (Don't bother: if you did not read the article, you will not understand the comment)

      Haha... very clever -- nearly tricked me into reading the article! We on Slashdot know better than that!

  11. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The real question is: how did the NSA know that the Dutch secret service was doing this?
    Either the NSA is spying on the spies, or they're sharing data.

  12. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surprise! Every govt has an intelligence service and every intelligence service spends at least part of its time spying on its own citizens.

    Yes, we know, you knew this ages ago before anyone else because it's obvious, and nobody else should be surprised. Knowing is not the point. The point is that a lot of people weren't aware of the extent or scale of it, and "revealing" this information with solid proof of what's going on sparks a debate in the relevant countries of whether or not this is acceptable and whether or not they're OK with it. The fact that it is going on is not the big deal here, the big deal is whether or not people think it is acceptable, and that debate can only be informed with solid information rather than "of course they spy on us! That's obvious!" hand waving. You make it sound like we should never start discussions about what our governments are up to because it's all so obvious anyway.

    As an aside, the oversight committee says that some of what they did was "“not in accordance with Dutch law”, and a few Dutch MPs are calling for an inquiry. What happens (or doesn't as the case may be) in response to that can be say a lot of interesting things about a government and again help citizens form an opinion of their government or their neighbours government.

  13. Re:Why by shikaisi · · Score: 1

    The real question is: how did the NSA know that the Dutch secret service was doing this?

    They were paying them to do it?

    --
    No left turn unstoned.
  14. Re:EXPoSE THE DARKNESS !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone please tell me that APK doesn't have a new (or rather, additional) obsession to blather on about.

  15. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but [German is not] a world-popular language.

    Yet.

    Send in the panzers!!!!

    You thought all those comments about grammar-nazis were just jokes, eh?

    Today your diction... tomorrow the world!

  16. "is" vs "would" by cbraescu1 · · Score: 0

    And yes, that is gross misconduct against Dutch law.

    Just because Snowden alleges anything doesn't necessarily mean that thing is true. Snowden must provide enough proof (be it direct or indirect) for his claims to be actually taken seriously.

    Therefore, by logic, the OP should have actually commented "what WOULD BE gross misconduct against Dutch law".

    --
    Catalin Braescu
    Ofaly.com
    1. Re:"is" vs "would" by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am the original poster. Snowden never alleged that this is against Dutch law. The newspaper that published this ( in the very early morning hours, btw, they did not wait for daybreak and people getting out of bed ) alleges it. So do I. I read the law that governs the AIVD's activities. This is clearly outside of the framework set by that law: "... and [ is allowed ] to infiltrate organizations which endanger national or public security...". Now, an internet forum is not an "organization which endangers national or public security", unless you live in Iran, North Korea or China.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    2. Re:"is" vs "would" by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      sorry "gross misconduct against Dutch law" doesn't even make legal sense can you quote the dutch RIPA law which says that what they did is not allowed?

    3. Re:"is" vs "would" by mjwalshe · · Score: 2

      some of the users might be which is presumably the justification - its the same when you tap the phones ATT isn't the target one or more of the users of the service is

    4. Re:"is" vs "would" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't hack an entire fucking forum to get at a few bogeymen. Anyone who says otherwise is a government cheerleader.

    5. Re:"is" vs "would" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, an internet forum is not an "organization which endangers national or public security", unless you live in Iran, North Korea, China , or the USA.

      FTFY
      (hmm, someone loudly knocking my door now...)

    6. Re:"is" vs "would" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't hack an entire fucking forum to get at a few bogeymen.

      Not only can you, the Dutch did!

    7. Re:"is" vs "would" by Teun · · Score: 1
      A repeat from a previous post I made:
      I just read a statement by the responsible minister Plasterk who says he feels the AIVD (secret service) is working within the law.

      He refuses to go into detail but admits the AIVD is targeting fora where people are called upon to take part in violence and fora with violent video's. He states the authority (CTIVD) tasked with supervision of the secret services did not see reasons to correct the activities of the services.

      I must agree with him (and against you) that some fora can pose a thread to our national and the international security in a way that legalises action by the secret services.

      Besides, by their design internet fora are not limited to a single country.

      Unless you live in Iran, North Korea or China.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    8. Re:"is" vs "would" by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Now, an internet forum is not an "organization which endangers national or public security"

      Actually, the legal justification for this is that the internet forum is the ONLY way in which these people meet, exchange ideas, put together timetables, and organize. Which means that the forum members are an organization and the forum is the embodiment of that organization.

      While one can (and lots of people will!) certainly argue the point, it's not without merit. I don't condone *anything* the AIVD does, including this, because their main function is to protect the status quo and that only coincidentally happens to also protect some lives here and there, but to say they're outside the law is going a bit too fast. The law that pertains to this subject is very likely outdated and should be reviewed.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    9. Re:"is" vs "would" by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Well by that argument you should not tap any phones what so ever

    10. Re:"is" vs "would" by Keyboard+Rage · · Score: 2

      The problem is precisely that this absurd interpretation of the words "criminal organisation" is used with regards to internet forums. Apparently, the fact that some people on forums might be dangerous terrorists (of the Muslim persuasion, according to the AIVD, because as we know extreme right movements never bomb anything...) means that the whole forum can be considered a criminal organisation and makes it okay to siphon up all user data, including that of innocent users.

      The other problem is that the law is not adapted well to modern times. Now, the 'solution' the organisation supervising the MIVD and AIVD is advocating is changing the law to retroactively allow the previously described behaviour. This is all very strange, because this supervising organisation is supposed to be independent from both security services and is also meant to keep both in check with the law.

      Ronald Plasterk, who is responsible for both the AIVD, the MIVD, and the supervising organisation, is claiming that all is according to the law (when it is not). So now various MPs are calling for a parliamentary investigation into the use of illegal investigation methods by the secret services and he is even being criticised by his own party members. Hopefully this will happen.

      The lackluster reaction by Mark Rutte (the prime minister) and several other people in power is quite worrying though...they just don't seem to care.

  17. Comments of the AIVD by opdenkamp · · Score: 2

    The AIVD did comment, even before the NRC published the article: https://www.aivd.nl/actueel/@3033/interception/ (Dutch)
    And after the article was published: https://www.aivd.nl/actueel/@3034/reactie-nrc/ (Dutch)

    According to them, this is allowed by the current law. However, a lot of parties in parliament and expers don't agree with this assesment and are starting actions to disallow this kind of investigation.

    1. Re:Comments of the AIVD by opdenkamp · · Score: 1

      s/expers/experts

    2. Re:Comments of the AIVD by bigfoottoo · · Score: 1

      "Mass interception of telecommunications, for example by means of satellites, does not require the approval of the minister, because its content is not being processed and thus -according to the law- does not infringe the secrecy of correspondence, which includes telephone and telegraph. "

      Basically, they are saying that they can intercept everything and store it in the haystack, and as long as it is not processed, no privacy has been violated. They use the analysis of metadata to obtain targeted approval from the ministry to extract the relavent stored content. I suspect that the NSA uses a similar distorted reasoning in their bulk interception and examination of our phone calls. The only way we will ever defeat these clowns is to encrypt EVERYTHING. And, we will need to be diligent in our search for hard and soft backdoors.

  18. Politicians are outraged? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only because they fear they may be spied on too.

  19. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why were we ever surprised that government spies are acting like spies and ignoring the letter of the law to collect confidential information?

    Rains' character is shocked.

  20. Re:Language? by houghi · · Score: 2

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE_IUPInEuc if you want to learn a bit about Dutch and The Netherlands.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  21. Re:Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Reality is vomit-inducing. It's not his fault.

  22. This Just In by rmdingler · · Score: 0

    "Snowden says all dogs go to heaven!"

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  23. At the risk of this being a very Dutch-centric by bytesex · · Score: 2

    - post (damn Slashdot constraints on the length of the subject)

    It looks like the scandal in The Netherlands about the NSA from what is revealed by Snowden, is mainly the *lack* of anything scandalous at all. There was a four-page article in a leading newspaper the other week about it, and the most it could claim was that we were infiltrated from 1947 until 1968 and that, every now and then, they might take a poorly protected mySQL database on some poor slob's website.

    I don't mean to sound like those other 'security experts' who feign fatigue and familiarity with NSA's practices, but this one mainly stood out by its complete and utter boringness, I tell you.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:At the risk of this being a very Dutch-centric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - post (damn Slashdot constraints on the length of the subject)

      And good on them. Starting your post in the subject is bad form and shouldn't be encouraged.
      Do you also start your emails in the subject field?

      Seriously, this really bugs me. I wish Slashdot would simply do away with subjects altogether. And signatures too, while we're at it.

  24. Re:Why by bytesex · · Score: 2

    Eh.. because 'friendly' spying agencies are well-known for the way in which they exchange this kind of information?

    / Seriously.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  25. I for one welcome our new secret service overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to remind them, that as a trusted slashdot presonality, I, Anonymous Coward, can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their undergorund data mines.

  26. Re:Snowden by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a Dutch, living abroad.

    What I can say is that the situation has deteriorated over the past decade. Mostly thanks to kowtowing to the US. Nowadays everyone has to carry ID all the time; that's since just over a decade (and the rule was implemented remarkably silently). You have to give fingerprints for your passport, officially to make it more secure (but does it? Last summer I didn't see fingerprint scanners at the border, for example).

    Overall I think the Dutch do not fear their government (not like in more totalitarian states like the US, where everyone seems to fear their government), at least I don't exactly fear the government. It is chosen democratically, high degree of freedom of expression, and a free and strong press takes care of providing a proper counterbalance.

    The police in general do not abuse their power. Though over the past ten years there are more and more laws that give the police opportunities to abuse power, like the right to conduct random searches of people and vehicles. Police for example can at any time without giving a reason cordon off a street and search anyone that happens to be in that area.

    This AIVD thing is different, though. I don't consider AIVD to be government, they're more like police or judiciary: paid for but independent of the government. They have a mandate, to collect intelligence, and there are laws regulating what they can and can not do. Governments of all countries do this, it's normal part of police work too.

    What happened here appears to be outside that mandate (it should be, imho, but I don't know what the law says or what exactly happened). If they want info from a forum, they can just register as user (may need some undercover work, whatever), and read all posts on that forum - like any user can. It's not OK to hack into a server, and download complete databases, that's going too far. In case of a known criminal link, it's defensible, but in this case there seems to be no such suspicion.

  27. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OP was probably just gloating because many non-U.S. has been condemning U.S. for spying and torturing as if it doesn't go on by all as human nature.

  28. Re:Huh? What? by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    The point is that a lot of people weren't aware of the extent or scale of it

    Most people didn't know about this at all. Unsurprisingly, most people are also highly unintelligent.

  29. But not from other people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am not my government.

    I do not want this.

    Therefore I can be outraged at YOUR government's villainy just fine, thank you.

  30. Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody thinking that Russia took him so that they got a chance to censor their secrets?

  31. Iron Sky flashback by paiute · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the scene in Iron Sky when the President asks "OK, anybody who doesn't have an armed space station raise their hand."

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Iron Sky flashback by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Oh man please be the same and we're the only ones who haven't...

  32. News Flash by whizbang77045 · · Score: 0

    News Flash! Intelligence agencies caught gathering intelligence! Film at 11!

  33. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all for the 1000 year rike.

  34. Re:The Dutch Don't "get" the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, just shockingly arrogant,

    have you ever met the amish?

  35. Re:The Dutch Don't "get" the Internet by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    There seems to be many smart Dutch people in the open source world. To throw a couple of names, Bram Moolenaar, who is the Vim author, and...uhh...Andrew Tanenbaum...

  36. Re:Huh? What? by Goaway · · Score: 1

    Yes, let's accept despicable behaviour to make ourselves look jaded and cool on the internet. That is a great solution to all problems!

  37. Re:Language? by Razgorov+Prikazka · · Score: 2

    Whether it`s Dutch, German or English, it should be fora... not forums.

    --
    rm -rf --no-preserve-root / ...and let /dev/null sort them out...
  38. And take a wild guess who their client is by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    Ot should that be "whose client they are".
    Who gives.

  39. Re:Huh? What? by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 0

    Apathic troll.
    Die.

  40. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dutch itself is pretty close to German

    Don't ever say this to a Dutchman.

  41. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rike? Try Reich

  42. And nothing is changing yet by erroneus · · Score: 1

    While certain diplomatic and economic relations are under strain and protests go on all over, it's important to note that none of the surveillance and other civil rights and outright illegal activity has slowed or stopped at all. In some ways it seems to have increased.

    Demanding that these activities cease is action #1.

  43. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whether it`s Dutch, German or English, it should be fora... not forums.

    In the Dutch version, it is!

  44. There are no Amish subtitles by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    At least they don't hard code their !@#$%%# subtitles before the upload their rips. Even they're not that discourteous.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  45. Re:Snowden by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    I got modded into flamebait (I guess I'll simply have to stop commenting on Snowden leaks), but you provided a good response. Thank you for the explanation.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  46. Re: The Dutch Don't "get" the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I have met many Amish. They are not Dutch. You might enjoy reading up on Amish/Mennonite history. They are a facinating people. I grew up around them in Central Pennsylvania, USA. I greatly admire their integrity, work ethic, humility and grace. If someone finds them arrogant or dumb, it is probably because that person has been rude or offensive to them and they are attempting to not reply in kind.

  47. Re:Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to give fingerprints for your passport, officially to make it more secure (but does it? Last summer I didn't see fingerprint scanners at the border, for example).

    The fingerprints are likely stored for verification purposes and might be sent out to requesting authorities across the world to combat passport forgery.

    It's not OK to hack into a server, and download complete databases, that's going too far. In case of a known criminal link, it's defensible, but in this case there seems to be no such suspicion.

    The article suggests that there might have been a target there, but surely then the data gathering could have been focused on the target and it's social graph? Reading the English article it really seems like the Facebook generation has entered in the service of the public. The result is "no more privacy" and "people who think they are entitled to privacy as part of their human rights are either dead, should be dead, in the old people's home or criminals and pedophiles."
      In my neighborhood of 1.5 million people who represent a significant part of the population, over 70% are Facebook users. I think I'm on the losing side of the next civil war already.

  48. Snowden for US President! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really bothers me how many Americans have called Snowden a traitor. He is a hero braving to do what too few others in the know have done.

    1. Re:Snowden for US President! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only paid shills have called him a traitor.
      Even the dumb people that think government is their friend have enough sense to know that Snowden's actions could not, in any stretch of the imagination, be considered traitorous. Of course, this doesn't stop certain news groups from trying to change the definition of words like "treason" to mean "anything that I don't personally agree with" in attempt to mislead the populace.

    2. Re:Snowden for US President! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Only paid shills have called him a traitor.

      Correction ..... only paid shills and imbeciles have called him a traitor.

  49. Re:Language? by Damouze · · Score: 2

    Actually, both are equally correct in Dutch.

    --
    And on the Eighth Day, Man created God.
  50. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're correct, Sir.

  51. Re:Language? by Alarash · · Score: 2

    I've also personally witnessed that the Dutch tend so speak a much, much better English than the rest of Europe. I'm saying this as a French, who is generally a people who don't speak other languages very well. I believe this is because in the Netherlands almost no English program is dubbed, so people develop a good skill for the language. Since I travel across all of Europe, I've noted that countries that usually dub the English program (Germany, France, Spain, Italy) tend to have a lower English level than the countries who don't (Portugal, Netherlands, Nordics, ...).

    I'm all for preserving languages with a strong literary background (I'm mostly familiar with France's, obviously, but I do believe it's known worldwide thanks to people like Victor Hugo, Balzac or other great authors), but when it makes those people basically speak only their native tongue it's a little sad.

  52. Re:Huh? What? by mspohr · · Score: 0

    So your point is...?
    - We should all just shut up like good sheeple?
    - We should learn to like spying?
    - Torture is good!
    - They are saving us from the terrorists!
    - Lady Gaga?

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  53. When Dutch People Date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do each of them pay their own way?

  54. Re:Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A civil war between those with Facebook accounts and those without? I'm in, even if we're outnumbered.

  55. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but in the Dutch version, it is written fora, so if you wanted to be a pain about it, you could. The point is moot anyway, because there's no reason (other than convention) to favor forums over fora in English.

  56. Re:Snowden by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    The fingerprints are likely stored for verification purposes and might be sent out to requesting authorities across the world to combat passport forgery.

    That doesn't improve the situation in the least. Violating people's privacy for security purposes is not acceptable.

  57. Re:The Dutch Don't "get" the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bram Moolenaar, who is the Vim author

    Well, there you go. He's obviously mentally deranged.

  58. Re:The Dutch Don't "get" the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever one of their citizens posts a new movie on the Internet, they invariably hard code Dutch Subtitles, despite the fact that using the .mkv format *it's more difficult to hard code Subtitles than simply mux them in.

    Every time you see one of these, you know the Dutch are just dumb.

    And yet its the Americans who are too dumb and build cities that are submerged by floods.
    They're so dumb in fact that they have to ask the Dutch for advices in how to deal with climate change and rising seawater levels. Oh but I forget, the Americans are too dumb to even think climate change is real.
    Yanks enjoy your underwater cities in the next 100-200 years. Mission accomplished.

  59. Re: Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you missed it... The German was almost a primary language of America :-)

  60. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Navel gazing is France's raison d'être (They lost an empire, they lost the ability to decide Europe's future, they've lost the so called French Grandeur...). At this point don't take them seriously on anthying. The world just passed them by.

    France has had no interest in deciding the "future of Europe" since Napoleon. It's like you're complaining about Obama because of something the Cherokees did.

  61. Re:Language? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree and as I am English (and thus speak only one language) I should be able to judge their aptitude. In fact, the Dutch seem to be amazingly good with languages and often their English is better than native speakers.

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  62. Re: Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's not to rike?

  63. Re:Language? by gmanterry · · Score: 2

    When I was in the Peace Corps (American) in Africa, I met several Dutch Peace Corps volunteers. They were all multilingual and their English was almost perfect. They told me that when you come from a small country surrounded larger countries that speak other languages, you learn their languages. They were all great people. The world could use more people like the Dutch.

    --
    Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
  64. Re:Huh? What? by umafuckit · · Score: 1

    In fact, it's Britney Spears who is used in this capacity: http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/oct/29/britney-spears-navy-scare-somali-pirates

  65. Re:Language? by Teun · · Score: 1
    Why not?

    It's a fact that the Dutch language sits somewhere between English and German, all three have a common Germanic ancestor.
    Please ignore the idiots that keep repeating something that happened well before their time.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  66. Re:EXPoSE THE DARKNESS !!! by Teun · · Score: 1
    Indeed, not many have time on their hands to use so much html.

    And keep repeating the unasked for message.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  67. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because voting and demonstrating has done so well at preventing these atrocious abuses of power and corruption, right?

  68. Re: Language? by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

    ROR

  69. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, why do you think this is part of the NSA leaks? U.S. have pressured many smaller nations in being part of their surveillance machinery, I would be surprised if this isn't the case here too.

  70. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that they aren't exchanging data. It is a one way transfer to NSA.

  71. Re:Snowden by Teun · · Score: 1
    I'm Dutch and live in the country but spend some 6 months per year travelling the world.
    And I can largely subscribe to the points you are making.
    We don't have the 'fear' or hatred of our government you sometimes read about on /. coming from US citizen, generally our government is doing what the parliament mandates them with.

    So in this particular case we will see some interesting debates between the executive and the elected legislature.

    I just read a statement by the responsible minister Plasterk who says he feels the AIVD (secret service) is working within the law.

    He refuses to go into detail but admits the AIVD is targeting fora where people are called upon to take part in violence and fora with violent video's. He states the authority (CTIVD) tasked with supervision of the secret services did not see reasons to correct the activities of the services.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  72. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surprise! Every govt has an intelligence service and every intelligence service spends at least part of its time spying on its own citizens.

    Surprise! Every govt has an intelligence service and every intelligence service routinely violates their countries laws, international laws, and the laws of good taste and decency.

    There, I fixed it for you.

  73. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US only tortures prisoners under usual conditions with lousy cells, boredom and really lousy food. Even during WWII the torture of an enemy prisoner was very rare. One exception was German submariners as submarines were considered unfair and sort of evil. But almost all other prisoners were treated unusually well.
                              Lately we have the sad experience of the Bush administration using torture on suspected terrorists and frankly it is a national embarrassment and effectively implies consent to torture US servicemen who are captured. The US has lost our moral authority over a rather weak and pitiful enemy.

  74. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more the wrongdoings of the governments of the west are exposed

    Then by all means, go back to Stalingrad, East Berlin, Myanmar, or North Korea--wherever you feel the most "free".

    In other words, welcome to the REAL world: it has always been this way, it's just that the curtain has now been pulled.

  75. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US servicemen captured in the middle east expect to be tortured and then summarily executed. It's astounding that people waste so much time bemoaning the fact that a few terrorists are getting bitched slapped and forced to listen to loud Britney Spears songs. Save your sympathy for those that actually deserve it.

  76. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's news because it reminds individuals that under the regimes that rule over them, "rule of law" does not exist. It's news because it reminds individuals that their alleged government representatives operate above the law.

  77. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Save your sympathy for those that actually deserve it.

    Like children at weddings?

  78. hacking forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    such as vbulletin, phpb etc is not simply just "taking a poorly protected mySQL database on some poor slob's website."

    hopefully you never be put in a position of power, which you couldn't care less if you abused it

  79. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of the point of TFA: It isn't just the West!

  80. Re:Huh? What? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Only the West tried to position itself via the UN, conventions covering conflicts, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helsinki_Accords to respect many legally listed human rights.
    Many other countries under princes, juntas, communism, faiths just admit they need 'experts' and 'time' to bring their staff up to an very low international standard.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  81. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its the USA's fault.
    just like that parking ticket i received in germany last week

  82. Re:Why by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Thank of it as locals given clearances and tech way beyond the very limited budgets of their mid level colleagues by the US and UK.
    At a top level they get to go to the US and UK, they are supported in their expensive regional tech upgrades and their own continuing tech education.
    The data flows one way - back to the USA/UK and their select friends but local EU staff in select nations have been well cared for over ~50 years.
    EU secret services now face the reality of groups of individuals with top EU security clearance that are more dedicated to the UK/US than their own elected officials or their legal system.
    Databases, court computers, law enforcement, political telco tech is all signed off as been nationally 'secure' by trusted local EU staff when they know full well its all linked to a growing list of other countries (and ex staff).
    EU political leaders are slowly understanding the secure phone they where given is junk, trade negotiations where always 'lost' by their own trusted staff, their nations expensive mil/science and secure crypto efforts where given to a list of other countries for 'free' over decades.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  83. Re:Snowden by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re abuse power?... Nobody really knows what any staff do when the exit the gov.
    Do they take codes, methods, skills with them and work in the same way?
    What gov, company or other person do they end up working for in the private sector?
    "Corporate and police spying on activists undermines democracy"
    http://www.bath.ac.uk/ipr/our-publications/policy-briefs/policy-brief-corporate-and-police-spying-on-activists.html
    "The corporate security agencies and private spies involved in collecting and analysing activist intelligence - and in the subsequent (covert) actions - tend to see their background in the police or the secret service as a selling point and do not hesitate to use connections with former colleagues or friends."

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  84. Re:Why by mrbluze · · Score: 1

    EU political leaders are slowly understanding the secure phone they where given is junk, trade negotiations where always 'lost' by their own trusted staff, their nations expensive mil/science and secure crypto efforts where given to a list of other countries for 'free' over decades.

    It actually doesn't matter what the EU political leaders understand, but the big change is that they have to find a new way to sell the bullshit ideas that they represent to the public now that the public recognizes said ideas as bullshit.

    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  85. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that makes the OP seem like a dick is that only the US push the believe that they're the greatest and the most freedom loving.

  86. Re:Huh? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowledge != intellect.

  87. Re:Huh? What? by AIphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    Agreed. But you'd have to be unintelligent to not have figured out that something like this was happening a long time ago.

  88. Re:Snowden by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Do they take codes, methods, skills with them and work in the same way?

    It appears possible that they do. How do we know that Snowden isn't doing exactly that.

    Was that your point? I didn't really pick up what you were putting down.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  89. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dictionary lists both 'fora' and 'forums' as plurals.

    Personally, I prefer 'forums' because I'm sick of the Anglo Saxon love affair with Latin/German/anything else plurals. It makes more sense to stop being obsessed with how to pluralise things, and just whack an 's' or 'es' on the end.

  90. Re:Huh? What? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    What is far more important is why and not just that they are doing. It is all smelling like existing dominant political parties and using political appointees infesting security organisations to subvert democratic principles to lock in their power and deny access to other political groups. This seems to be a growing global problem resulting from the loss of influence of the idiot box and it's ability to filter out content with insufficient capital access.

    It seems to be about the evil internet and the rich and greedy being unable to censor it dollars and now they are resorting to political appointees and total subversion of intelligence organisations.

    The rich and greedy are falling into the age old trap, the more you empower security organisations, the more likely the heads of those organisations are to 'KILL' those that empowered them to ensure they could not take away that power. Those organisations don't just spy, they kill, the rich and greedy via their pet politicians are fooling around with some truly dangerous toys and they will turn around and attack their masters in order to become the masters.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  91. Dates back to suppressed newspaper stories by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The people that talked about it were lumped in with the tinfoil hat mob and the newspapers were not allowed to print much about it. Any serious discussion was labelled as a "conspiracy theory" then later as "Xfiles shit". People were ridiculed for referring to what agencies were up to in Central America, things that are now in mainstream history. People thought "if it's real it will be in the Washington Post", and when it wasn't they thought it must be bullshit.
    So "common knowledge" to a lot of people was discounted as "something I heard once from a nut". That's why people are surprised and why some people are going overboard with the 9/11 truther bullshit because they think that if one thing they had dismissed as a conspiracy theory is true why not the lot?

    1. Re:Dates back to suppressed newspaper stories by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I grew up in the 60's and 70's and I think most people were aware that this stuff was going on although maybe not to the degree. For the most part the attitude was "so what, I've got nothing to hide." I really don't think most people think privacy is such a big deal. Here in the geek world it's blown up to be a sign of tyranny but I think Joe Public isn't quite so outraged. Even with the Snowden files dribbling in the public outcry isn't that imperious for something to be done. Spy agencies spy on people, it's what they do. Congress is supposed to control this but they've been letting it slide and these agencies given such a long leash will take full advantage.

  92. Don't blame Snowden by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I believe the Gaurdian has the lot but is spreading it out for both practical (so much of it) and circulation (milk it for all they can to sell more papers) reasons. So I think you are attacking the wrong messenger.
    I'd really hate to deliver bills or bad news to you :)

  93. Re:Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My main issue with the Dutch publishing things in English is that it is typically of higher quality than my own [American] English.

  94. Re:Snowden by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Just that the 'abuse power' aspect has been noted in the EU over the past years. All that GCHQ/NSA encryption and hardware skill set has passed into a few EU tech staff hands too.
    A few times it seems to make the press or is reflected back in the wider EU legal system.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SISMI-Telecom_scandal
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_wiretapping_case_2004–05
    As for Snowden all the docs are in the hands of the press for the 'press' to sort, publish, keep, hold.. as they wish over time.
    http://cryptome.org/2013/11/snowden-tally.htm the amount of data published so far and on what topics.
    http://cryptome.org/2013/11/snowden-related-targets.htm

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  95. Re:EXPoSE THE DARKNESS !!! by Maritz · · Score: 1

    I see you've focused more on the speculations and misunderstandings. With a little sprinking of batshit crazy. Well done..! ;)

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  96. Re:Huh? What? by ganesh.rao · · Score: 0

    For a change, I know that there are like minded people here :)
    Felt rather alone for a while.

  97. Re:Language? by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

    All language is convention, that's why and how it works.

  98. Re:Language? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    The Dutch normally speak Dutch, because, well, it's their native tongue. Dutch itself is pretty close to German, but neither are world-popular language. As such, most people in the Netherlands speak English as well, because they're a hub of business. Publishing this in English ensures it's widely readable to the rest of the world.

    Is American "World English"? The rest of the world puts in the missing letters omitted from words, such as neighbour, colour, etc.

    The rest of the world says I will take some ideas "from" xyz and Americans say "will take ideas "off of" xyz.
    It would take tomes to list the differences in language usage, so much so that in my view, "American" is a distinct language.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada