Slashdot Mirror


SteamOS Will Be Available For Download On December 13

sfcrazy writes "Valve Software, creator of Half-Life and Left 4 Dead, has announced that SteamOS will be available for public download on December 13. That's the day when the company will start shipping Steam Machines and Steam Controllers to the 300 selected beta participants. The company said, 'SteamOS will be made available when the prototype hardware ships. It will be downloadable by individual users and commercial OEMs. (But unless you're an intrepid Linux hacker already, we're going to recommend that you wait until later in 2014 to try it out.)"

211 comments

  1. How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by jeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kind of want to try this in Virtualbox.

    --
    If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
    1. Re: How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, encrypted "first post"

    2. Re: How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, encrypted "first post"

      - Ruku

    3. Re:How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want an OS that is based on DRM?

      You have a good point there; I have no idea why anyone would want that. I guess for playing video games it is probably better to just run Mac, Windows, or use any of the current video game consoles where at least I know I am free.

      Yep, I can just see it now. "Error: Cannot connect to Valve servers, unable to boot operating system"

    4. Re:How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I would use it in a dual-boot or VM configuration. It would be nice to have a free locked-down gaming OS that doesn't have umpteen crapware processes eating up resources in the background, billions of security holes due to unneeded directory sharing bullshit and just be dedicated to making your games work absolutely flawlessly at optimal performance. Of course I would not want it as the only, or even primary OS on my computer, but I would definitely consider setting it up as dual-boot.

      Think of it as a way to temporarily turn your computer into a game console!

    5. Re:How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a game console that won't let you play single player games without an internet connection and phoning home.

    6. Re:How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      Offline mode works fine for 30 days without an internet connection.

    7. Re:How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not good enough. It's a single player game, it should be playable at all times without an internet connection and without having to set it to offline mode prior to use.

    8. Re:How wfell wiill trhiss rutn ipn ao VsM?t by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've had more issues with legitimate copies of Windows going batshit because it hadn't spoken to its mothership since the last upgrade than I've ever had with any Steam restrictions.

  2. GNOME? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Are they providing a sensible version of GNOME? I very want to shuck Ubuntu, and this would let me have my Steam games *and* a usable desktop system.

    (I know there are GNOME alternatives, but I'm hoping for the easy way out.)

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:GNOME? by Daniel+Hoffmann · · Score: 2

      Mint comes with multiple window managers, personally I like cinnamon. But anyway you can install it yourself on your ubuntu box, it is easy.

    2. Re:GNOME? by GreatDrok · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Are they providing a sensible version of GNOME? I very want to shuck Ubuntu, and this would let me have my Steam games *and* a usable desktop system."

      This isn't the Linux you're looking for. This is stripped down and intended to run Steam in Big Picture mode all the time. No desktop at all. The standard Steam client on a Linux system is what you're looking for.

      Personally, I shy away from the bleeding edge Linux systems and stick with CentOS.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    3. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try MATE or Cinnamon. MATE isn't as pretty as Cinnamon, but it sure is responsive and light even on really low-end hardware (using it on an old netbook now with no issues).

      Both are forks of GNOME 2.

    4. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Personally, I shy away from X and stick with Z."

      everyone has an opinion. ::yawn::

    5. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you can install those desktop environments in other distros and not have to reinstall your OS every 6-8 months to keep up with the latest release like you do with mint.

    6. Re: GNOME? by BlindFett · · Score: 1

      Centos or any RHEL equivalent is good or just download kernel and build system how ever you like Arch is a nice start point for diy Linux build.

    7. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't used Debian-based distros since I found the Arch Way, but I'm pretty sure installing whatever WM you want is a simple matter of aptitude install something, where something you can find with a single aptitude search for gnome.

    8. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no purpose for this distro. My applications require a DESKTOP environment. Why limit user’s options? This is like MacOS only running iTunes or Windows only able to run Office. It makes no sense.

    9. Re:GNOME? by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see no purpose for this distro. My applications require a DESKTOP environment. Why limit user’s options?

      Because this is Valve's game console.

      Just like my Xbmc front end boots into Xbmc, and not a desktop. Xbmc is all it's meant to do.

    10. Re:GNOME? by exomondo · · Score: 2

      You know you can just use a 'sensible version of GNOME' on Ubuntu if you want right? It's really easy.

    11. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gnome 2 was massive amounts of bloat. XFCE of LXDE are both worlds faster. The fact that the new stuff is worse doesn't make gnome "light and responsive"

    12. Re:GNOME? by Jartan · · Score: 1

      This is stripped down and intended to run Steam in Big Picture mode all the time. No desktop at all.

      Do you have a source on this? Steam sells apps so this sounds unlikely.

    13. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you have any citation for the claim that it will not have a desktop environment other than Steam in Big Picture mode? That certainly is not something I have seen claimed by Valve or anyone else.

    14. Re:GNOME? by Sudline · · Score: 2

      Cinnamon is a fork of Gnome Shell/ Gnome 3

    15. Re:GNOME? by RoboJ1M · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.engadget.com/2013/11/04/valve-steam-machine-hands-on/

      "Anyone who uses Steam's Big Picture Mode is already intimately acquainted with SteamOS, as they're very similar. SteamOS looks and acts like Big Picture Mode, except it's the basis for the entire hardware system. It's controller-friendly and easy to navigate. The same Steam splash page washes across the screen when it launches, and the same tile-based layout of games and the Steam store are visible at launch. As promised, the OS is built on Linux (not based on Ubuntu, we're told, but entirely custom), though you'd never know it as the only interactive layer is all Steam.

      That means it also has the limitations of Steam: SteamOS is not the replacement for Windows 8 you've been waiting for. Beyond basics like browsing the web, there's little in the way of standard OS functions."

    16. Re:GNOME? by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      http://www.engadget.com/2013/11/04/valve-steam-machine-hands-on/

      "Anyone who uses Steam's Big Picture Mode is already intimately acquainted with SteamOS, as they're very similar. SteamOS looks and acts like Big Picture Mode, except it's the basis for the entire hardware system. It's controller-friendly and easy to navigate. The same Steam splash page washes across the screen when it launches, and the same tile-based layout of games and the Steam store are visible at launch. As promised, the OS is built on Linux (not based on Ubuntu, we're told, but entirely custom), though you'd never know it as the only interactive layer is all Steam.

      That means it also has the limitations of Steam: SteamOS is not the replacement for Windows 8 you've been waiting for. Beyond basics like browsing the web, there's little in the way of standard OS functions."

    17. Re:GNOME? by DrXym · · Score: 2

      Because it's not aimed at people who want a desktop. It's aimed at people who have a device sitting under their TV and want a simple navigable interface to play games or do other activities of a similar nature (e.g. streaming content).

    18. Re:GNOME? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      It should pretty obvious that SteamOS is not intended for desktop use. It might be possible to install a desktop, but this is primarily meant for use under a TV or similar set up. I even doubt that people are expected to even install games onto the OS itself. I expect the ultimate intention is Valve will launch a cloud service so that SteamOS is just a minimal frontend for games running somewhere else.

    19. Re:GNOME? by famebait · · Score: 2

      Same here. What I need is a sharp axe to split firewood with. Why would I use a console OS for that? This product is clearly worthless.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    20. Re:GNOME? by nightsky30 · · Score: 1

      "Are they providing a sensible version of GNOME? I very want to shuck Ubuntu, and this would let me have my Steam games *and* a usable desktop system."

      This isn't the Linux you're looking for. This is stripped down and intended to run Steam in Big Picture mode all the time. No desktop at all. The standard Steam client on a Linux system is what you're looking for.

      Personally, I shy away from the bleeding edge Linux systems and stick with CentOS.

      "Users can alter or replace any part of the software or hardware they want. Gamers are empowered to join in the creation of the games they love. SteamOS will continue to evolve, but will remain an environment designed to foster these kinds of innovation."

      - Sounds like it's meant to be hacked however the end-user sees fit. If I want to add a desktop I will. I agree that adding the steam client to a current linux desktop might be best if you want stability in your desktop apps. But don't you think games would run best on Steam when run on the official OS made by Valve?

    21. Re:GNOME? by nhat11 · · Score: 1

      @ Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 12, 2013 @05:12AM - Besides, let Valve focus on making a GOOD GAMING OS. If I want a productivity, general OS I would install Ubuntu or Windows.

    22. Re:GNOME? by nhat11 · · Score: 1

      Yes, agree 100%.Let Valve focus on making a GOOD GAMING OS.

    23. Re:GNOME? by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      I even doubt that people are expected to even install games onto the OS itself.

      No, no-one will install games on this thing. It's not like Steam has the most successful gaming app store ever.
      (I'm guessing you mean "install from a third party", and that will probably be difficult, yes.)

      I expect the ultimate intention is Valve will launch a cloud service so that SteamOS is just a minimal frontend for games running somewhere else.

      This doesn't make sense from a lot of perspectives. One is latency. Another is the fact that they've spent a lot of time, money and PR on making a box+OS to actually run games on, including large improvements to the Linux GPU drivers. A third is the fact that all previous attempts have failed, see OnLive.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    24. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some opinions are more informed or interesting than others.

    25. Re:GNOME? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Taking bets on how long it takes people to fork SteamOS into SteamBoatOS with full desktop and other crap...

      I'm betting 45 seconds.

    26. Re:GNOME? by Krneki · · Score: 1

      But if you log out of xmbc you get to the desktop.

      XBMC Linux distro is based on Ubuntu. And it has pretty much anything you need from a desktop OS + all you want from Ubuntu apt-get library.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    27. Re:GNOME? by module0000 · · Score: 1

      This is not for "OS" use.. it's meant to be installed on a media-center style box in your living room by your TV. The only interaction with it is meant to be through a controller - it's not for you to compile code on, instead it's for your kid to pick up a controller and start a game without any "computer" work. It's a pretty cool idea when you think about it, let people build their own "console gaming systems", and just give them a nice OS that will drive them.

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    28. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ill-informed and uninteresting people always say that

    29. Re:GNOME? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      But if you log out of xmbc you get to the desktop.

      No, you get to a login screen.

      There's no window manager or desktop running on that box, though you could log in to a desktop if you want. I don't ever have a reason to do so, myself.

    30. Re:GNOME? by jalopezp · · Score: 1

      XBMC is not a linux distribution, buddy. And you can get any of them to boot directly to XBMC. I've got no desktop environment or even a window manager. All you need is an X server and XBMC.

    31. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you replied to the wrong comment or OMG WHOOOOOOOOOOOSH.

    32. Re:GNOME? by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they will be using Mate, which started as a fork of GNOME 2 with some discarded useful features added back in!

      GNOME 3 is a Triumph of Fashion over Functionality...

    33. Re:GNOME? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      "Are they providing a sensible version of GNOME? I very want to shuck Ubuntu, and this would let me have my Steam games *and* a usable desktop system."

      This isn't the Linux you're looking for. This is stripped down and intended to run Steam in Big Picture mode all the time. No desktop at all. The standard Steam client on a Linux system is what you're looking for.

      In other words, no X11/Wayland, no KDE/Unity/GNOME/XFCE..., none of that? Just a Linux in shell mode running the games? Or does Steam mount its own DE and display manager?

    34. Re:GNOME? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Basically steam is releasing a console, and also releasing the operating system for it so you can basically build your own console. Think about it, no more need to send back entire consoles due to a bad HDD, badly designed hardware can be replaced with BETTER hardware, you can use any kind of case you want (custom style with lights and stuff), and so much more.

    35. Re:GNOME? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I just hope it will work in a dual-boot configuration! If so, goodbye windows forever :)

    36. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jump to conclusion much?

    37. Re:GNOME? by Krneki · · Score: 1

      You do if you set it up and it's easy. I have it since I turned my HTPC in all in one box. SSH, torrent, desktop, router, firewall, FTP, SFTP, file server, .... everything.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    38. Re:GNOME? by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Ofc it is, it even has Chrome pre installed. The Linux version that is.

      http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php?title=Installing_XBMC_for_Linux

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    39. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Centos is terrible. There is very little hardware support and the kernel is ancient. Atleast use Fedora.

    40. Re:GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >uninteresting people always say that

      Wow really? Please give us more enlightened opinions to us mere mortals.

      srs stop fucking gloating you faggot

  3. Electric demons in love by crioca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's been a lot of hype and misconceptions about SteamOS within the gaming community especially. SteamOS isn't a desktop OS, it's a console OS and needs to be understood as such. It won't be a whole lot of use unless you're planning to set up a PC for use as a console.

    1. Re:Electric demons in love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just wait for a modified distribution of it.

    2. Re:Electric demons in love by Dega704 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. People really ought to look at it as a gaming equivalent of XBMC or something along those lines.

    3. Re:Electric demons in love by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's more like XBMC with gaming..and apps, cause it will stream all your media and play steam games.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Electric demons in love by Dega704 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hence why I plan to replace XBMC with it eventually. I can't wait to see what it matures into.

    5. Re:Electric demons in love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or install Steam on whatever Linux distribution you want...

    6. Re:Electric demons in love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more like XBMC with gaming..and apps, cause it will stream all your media and play steam games.

      Now if it had Blackjack and Hookers, they would be on to something.

    7. Re:Electric demons in love by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      It's more like XBMC with gaming..and apps, cause it will stream all your media and play steam games.

      Now if it had Blackjack and Hookers, they would be on to something.

      In fact, just never mind about the games.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    8. Re:Electric demons in love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux plays well with other linux bootable volumes.
      There is nothing except inertia preventing me from running my minty fresh desktop, and the public beta steambox distro on the same box.

      Or is a grub2 loader option too difficult to handle? Seriously.

      The point isn't to replace the desktop functionality; it's to replace the win32/64 partition for playing games. Win32/64 is MUCH less friendly about the MBR than another linux is. If you do your partitioning right, you can have the steamOS partition on its own tiny ext4 volume, and keep your data volume between desktop and game centric environments. (Admittedly, the risks of having FS issues increases a bit, but we assume you aren't a child here.)

    9. Re:Electric demons in love by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      exactly.

      if you already have a linux distro that runs steam then you have zero incentive to install SteamOS.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Electric demons in love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XBMC can launch apps and games too. I use XBMC on my HTPC to run emulators.

    11. Re:Electric demons in love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support?

      "It doesn't work on Steam OS either, so it can't be because of me running it on an unsupported distro".

    12. Re:Electric demons in love by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm going to try SteamOS just to see if Metro Last Light works on it.

      Tried it on my 64-bit Sabayon and it just dies on startup :-/

    13. Re:Electric demons in love by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      Getting a large install base so "the suits" see a linux distro as a viable option would be my goto point in a drunk pub debate. After that I got nothing.

    14. Re:Electric demons in love by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I've found for testing some things installing an alternate distro in VirtualBox works for testing. As an example I had issues with the Planetary Annihilation Beta and couldn't get it running under my Ubuntu 13.10 installation. I installed Linux Mint in VB and ran Planetary Annihilation. The game played like crap of course under the VM, but it loaded normally confirming it was an issue with the game running specifically under Ubuntu 13.10. After confirming the issue if was a lot easier to pin point what was causing the issue and we were able to come up with a temporary work around.

    15. Re:Electric demons in love by Krneki · · Score: 1

      No way I will trust Steam over XBMC for my OS.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    16. Re:Electric demons in love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The game played like crap of course under the VM, but it loaded normally confirming it was an issue with the game running specifically under Ubuntu 13.10.

      No, all that confirms is that you can run Planetary Annihilation on Linux Mint running on VirtualBox running on Ubuntu 13.10 running on your hardware. The issue might be due to Ubuntu 13.10, it might be something you've done to your system, it might even be due to VirtualBox hiding some hardware issue. You need to do a lot more testing if you want to actually confirm anything.

    17. Re: Electric demons in love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and people wonder why Linux has trouble catching on

  4. Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to not install it!!!

  5. Desktop Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gaming on Linux, FINALLY! ...If you're already an 'intrepid Linux hacker'.

    just like always. rofl.

    1. Re:Desktop Linux! by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh... There's levels of "intrepid Linux hacker"... Some go where angels fear to tread, after all... >;-D

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re: Desktop Linux! by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Funny

      And as soon as Gentoo finishes compiling they'll post their responses.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    3. Re: Desktop Linux! by nemasu · · Score: 2

      Gentoo?! Bah, real Linux hackers roll their own from source.

      --
      I made an app! Shoutium
    4. Re:Desktop Linux! by LurkNoMore · · Score: 1

      Heh... There's levels of "intrepid Linux hacker"

      Hell yes. I have an old laptop that connects to WiFi over the an Intel PRO/Wireless 2200 802.11bg AND print to a printer. When I looked in the mirror the next morning I had a full neckbeard.

  6. Indeed. The thing is... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    ...if you're doing Linux gamedev or are already using Steam on Linux...you may well be ready for that.

    Me?

    BRING IT

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  7. Gaming controllers by jones_supa · · Score: 5, Informative

    I browse Linux commit logs every now and then and these days there are surprisingly many various game controller patches flowing in. Good.

    1. Re:Gaming controllers by emj · · Score: 1

      Yes... e.g. the accelerometers in laptops are considered as a joystick, the reason for this is not clear to me,

    2. Re:Gaming controllers by WrecklessSandwich · · Score: 3, Informative

      Doesn't make sense for a laptop, but it's a common paradigm on mobile devices. There's flight sims etc. for Android/iOS where you steer by tilting your device like a little kid making racecar noises.

    3. Re:Gaming controllers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has something to do with the accelerometres in the hard drives that are used for shutdown protection. Phoronix was talking about it, they were using their external HD as a joystick.

    4. Re:Gaming controllers by higuita · · Score: 1

      something that reports 3 axis movement... it looks just like a joystick to me! :)

      forget about the name, joystick is the first and main 3 axis mapping device and never change the name with other things start to also do 3 axis mapping.

      --
      Higuita
  8. Re:Fuck Valve by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    lighten up, it's just for games. who cares if a fun game runs on even a closed source console or whatever? they pull the plug on thing in a couple years, so what?

  9. Re:Fuck Valve by Wookact · · Score: 2

    I cry and whine that no one cares that I don't like this and want it to go away

    FTFY

  10. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you run windows on it?

    1. Re:but by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

      oh well done! +1 funny (I wasted my mod points today)

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
  11. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

    ...if you're doing Linux gamedev or are already using Steam on Linux...you may well be ready for that.

    Me?

    BRING IT

    If you're serious about gaming on Linux, you're probably already doing that, actually... with a standard system. Unless you weren't actually planning on hooking it up to a TV in the first place (I wasn't).

    I can state, for example, that my USB XBoX controller works perfectly on Linux, and is supported by all but one or two of the games I have bought on Steam for Linux. It also works in Steam itself, for Big Picture mode. I also know for a fact that the HDMI out on my desktop/gaming system supports audio and 1080p to the TV. From there it's really trivial to set a desktop up to automatically login and launch Steam at startup, to launch Steam in Big Picture mode, and put it on a TV.

  12. Let's build our own SteamMachines by Dekonega · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The beta is U.S. Only, and that's a shame. I was hoping for the world wide beta test. But I guess they had their reasons. But at least the SteamOS will be downloadable so I can build my own device. I probably won't be investing too much time or money into it. If I buy Antec ISK300-150 and make a ~400€ AMD APU powered indie game device it would probably serve its duty well (and afterwards be a nice tiny server box). You people can probably recommend something better if this idea seems bad. Or share suggestions for others to read.

    1. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not get yourself a new midrange graphics card for your Linux box and just install the desktop Steam client?
      It's what I did and I've been playing nice games for months now; works great.

    2. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've never shipped an electronic device to customers, there are a lot of regulatory compliance issues you have to contend with. In the US, you'll have to deal with the FCC (even if you're not using wireless), and possibly UL. Pretty much every country has its own compliance hurdles you have to deal with (Europe has CE). If you support wireless, you need to be aware of region restrictions (not all WiFi channels are legal in all jurisdictions). Since they're only shipping 300 of the machines, they probably didn't see a reason to send out half that number for compliance testing.

    3. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The beta is U.S. Only, and that's a shame. I was hoping for the world wide beta test.

      Which is a bit of a shitter given they made a big hype about a worldwide beta test, then got people all over the world to agree to a contract in advance (421,843 people went through this expecting to be eligible for selection). I'd be less annoyed right now if they'd just said "US only" and not led us on a wild goose chase.

    4. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      If you have a laptop I would try it out on it first before sinking money in. Laptops normally have HDMI and if you have a wired xbox 360 controller you are set.

    5. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Antec ISK300-150 and an AMD A10-5700 with 8GB RAM and it runs very well for such a tiny (and quiet) PC. Skyrim in 720P (max res for my Vizio 37" TV) at Ultra detail (with the official high-res texture pack). I've currently got Windows 7 Professional x64, but I'm very excited to see if SteamOS has any performance bump behind it.

      Western Digital Scorpio Black 500 GB @ 7200 RPM
      MSI FM2-A75IA-E53 Mainboard
      AMD A10-5700 (I went with the 5700 for the 65w TDP)
      Kingston HyperX 8 GB DDR3 12800
      Panasonic UJ240 6x Blu-ray Burner
      Cheap knockoff Xbox 360 Wireless Receiver

    6. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      The beta is U.S. Only, and that's a shame.

      What really bothered me was that I wanted to be part of the beta (I seem to participate in lots of beta stuff) but unfortunately to be considered you had to play a game for 10 minutes with a controller or something like that to get the Steam badge that would throw you in the candidate pool.

      Unfortunately I did not have a controller that I could get to work with my PC and I couldn't get the PS3 controller I had on hand to communicate with my PC.

      So I'm kinda bummed out about that.

    7. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      I just borrow a friends XBox 360 controller...

    8. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't too happy about a US only beta either. Here's there statement:

        "We’ve had to make the difficult decision to limit our beta to the U.S. only, because of regulatory hurdles," Valve wrote. "This was not our original plan, and it means we can’t collect beta feedback from Steam customers world-wide, which is pretty unfortunate.

      "All things considered, we’re sure it was the right decision, because the alternative was to delay the whole beta beyond the point when we’d be able to incorporate any feedback into the 2014 products. This decision only affects Valve’s 300 prototype units; the commercial versions of Steam Machines that are for sale in 2014 won’t be affected by this. More information on those will be announced at CES on January 6. "

    9. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Or you can buy a used Intel CPU and used dedicated GPU and it will blow the poor APU away.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    10. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $400-500, you could buy a Xbox One or a PS4 that will do everything that a SteamOS box is capable of and significantly more.

    11. Re:Let's build our own SteamMachines by James+Carnley · · Score: 1

      If you weren't able to pass the almost non-existent qualifications for the beta then you probably aren't good beta tester material. Beta testing requires effort, perseverance, and the ability to solve problems and think intuitively about odd situations.

  13. Re:Fuck Valve by Microlith · · Score: 2

    Gaming is kiddy shit (sorry)

    Good to see who the mature one is(n't) here.

  14. Wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll be just as dead as HalfLife 3 by 2014.
     
    Unless you really want to pony up for another console there is zero reason to ever run this garbage. Take whatever OS you like and run Steam. The game selection will be just as good on any of the big 3 platforms and you won't be tied into hardware that will doubtlessly be more expensive than buying a rig from NewEgg.

    1. Re:Wait? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I guess SteamOS would still work better if you want a "10-foot user interface", i.e. a simple to use living room gaming OS.

    2. Re:Wait? by Immerman · · Score: 2

      I think the idea is basically to start freeing the entertainment PC industry from Microsoft's clutches, especially as the trend towards "App stores", centrally DRMed software, and hardware lockdown is making it's way to the PC - both Microsoft and Apple are moving that way, and that puts Valve at a distinct disadvantage as an app store, why go to them when your OS vendor has their store built in to the GUI? So instead they package their own OS streamlined specifically for gaming. After all last I heard Valve isn't looking to sell "Steam Boxes", they're giving the existing PC vendors a new sales front on the PC market - a label they can slap on the box telling consumers they can expect a certain kind of predictable experience, like "Windows Inside" except probably with less vendor expense beyond probably certifying that their boxes conform to certain conditions - i.e. all hardware is compatible and working drivers preconfigured, etc. Maybe even some standardized benchmarking.

      So - just want a gaming rig? Go ahead and buy a prebuilt Windows PC if you like. Or buy a "Steam Box" labeled PC instead, which works just as well without adding a "Microsoft Tax" to your purchase price, and quite possibly comes in a considerably more stylish case and is probably much quieter than most PCs as well - after all it's targeted at the living room, not the office. As an added bonus the Steam Box will probably perform better than the same hardware running Windows. After all a stripped-down gaming-focused OS is going to have a lot less of the uneeded (for gaming) general-purpose overhead that Windows has. And that's going to be worth a lot, both at the low end where every frame counts, and at the high end where people are paying hundreds of dollars in premiums for hardware that only gives them a couple percentage points extra performance.

      Will it cost more? Maybe. But maybe not. There is likely going to be some unavoidable extra overhead for the tighter thermal and acoustic requirements, not to mention any "bling factor" on the case, but that should be at least partly offset by the lack of a Windows license. And it's in both Valve's and the hardware vendors interest to keep prices competitive with Windows PC - after all Microsoft's stranglehold on the consumer OS market puts them in a position to engage in "unilateral negotiation" with hardware vendors, grabbing a larger slice of the profit margins than they would in a free market.

      And let's face it - a lot of these consoles are going to be bought for kids by parents /grandparents/etc, and which are they going to rather buy - the locked down " strictly a toy" Playstation/Xbox/etc, or the slightly more expensive unsubsidized Steam Box that can become a real PC at the flip of a switch, because it is after all basically a standardized PC in a nicer box. In fact I truly hope Valve integrates a graceful multi-boot option directly into their normal boot routine. Or perhaps even better a full desktop environment that runs as a "game". Whatever allows people to gracefully access the flexible power of the box they have sitting there instead of having to get a whole separate box that's basically another version of the same thing just with a different OS and standard controllers.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:Wait? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I think the idea is blazingly obvious - release a relatively thin client (which happens to be Linux but like XBMC could be anything) and stream games through the cloud. That is what is going on here.

      I expect that in the future when you buy a game on steam that there will be a "play instantly" option. Maybe you can even rent games this way, or subscribe to the service. But by decoupling where the game runs from where it is played, it doesn't matter what architecture or OS the user has. Cloud gaming in other words. Probably something little more complex than a chromecast or raspberry pi would be capable of serving as a streaming client and I imagine that Microsoft, Sony, Valve, Google, Apple all have their eyes set on something of that nature.

    4. Re:Wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole MS tax thing has been disproven time after time. The fact that you keep harping on it and really think that Valve looks to overthrow Microsoft shows that you're a sad little fanboy. Believe me, I was there once too back when it was the Amiga (and CD32 for those of us old enough to remember it) and we thought the same thing about Microsoft. And I can honestly tell you today that it was a foolish notion. And not that Amigas weren't great machines, they were. I still work on machines today because I like then instead of just whatever burns Microsoft's ass (BTW: I'm not posting this from a MS based machine) but this whole idea that an OS choice should be looked on like a holy war is stupid on its face.
       
      Whatever, keep pumping your fist in the air like you're fighting the good fight if that's what gets your through they day. Someday you'll see how much time you wasted fighting in a battle that only existed in your mind.

    5. Re:Wait? by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      Grrr... Third such unsubstantiated statement from you on this story. Seriously, do you have any shred of evidence suggesting Steam is planning to centralize the gaming hardware and stream the games from the cloud? Cause you're the only person that seems to believe so.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    6. Re:Wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someday you'll see how much time you wasted fighting in a battle that only existed in your mind.

      You seem to have a very inflated idea of the value of people's time for someone posting lies and crap on /.

    7. Re:Wait? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Anyone with an ounce of sense would see this is the direction this is all pointing.

    8. Re:Wait? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Anyone? Really? Sure it may become popular for casual gamers, but there's two major problems with your scenario: bandwidth and lag.

      Streaming a 32 bit 60Hz 1080p signal takes a LOT of bandwidth, ~4Gbps uncompressed, and good luck compressing it significantly in real time without dedicating far more computational power than rendering it in the first place. And doing so will introduce even more lag into an already bad situation. Your brain has a lifetime of experience dealing with ~125ms of lag between seeing something and getting a reaction to your fingers. Add even an extra 50 ms between action and visual response and your reactions start going to hell, and that's probably an optimistic number. Add in the fact that the internet is optimized for batch-oriented information transfer tolerant to wildly variable transmission delays and there's just no way you can satisfyingly stream any sort of relfex-oriented game. Remember, you're talking about *gamers* here - the sort of people who avoided cordless mice like the plague for years because the tiny extra amount of rock-steady lag introduced by the wireless transmission circuitry noticeably interfered with their reflexes.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re:Wait? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      > The whole MS tax thing has been disproven time after time.

      Really? Perhaps you are using the term differently than I. Or perhaps you live in a universe where Microsoft gives Windows away to PC manufacturers for free? I guarantee you that if you buy a new Windows PC there will be a chunk of that money that finds it's way into Microsoft's pocket to pay for the copy of Windows. If you don't actually *want* Windows then that's the "Microsoft tax". Yes, there are a few places distributing Linux-based or bare machines, but as a rule they are either smaller businesses who don't benefit from the economies of scale in manufacturing, or small "boutique" divisions within larger corporations such as with Dell and their business-oriented linux systms. In neither case do you particularly expect to see prices competitive with what you could buy an equivalent-hardware Windows machine from the broader market. So you're essentially paying an even higher price just to avoid the "tax", for reasons which have everything to do with Microsoft's heavily dominant market position.

      And yes, you can possibly get a refund after purchase, but that takes time and effort in it's own right - and that is after all the "true" currency, cash is simply a more efficient means of exchanging it.

      Oh, and by the way - nowhere do I advocate or express a "religious war" zealotry, that exists only in your mind, I consider such things ridiculous and unseemly and rarely partake. As a member of society however it does behoove me to keep an eye on the major forces and trends within the spheres that interest me, and it's hard to deny that Microsoft is one of the 800lb Gorillas in the room when it comes to computers, that they certainly do not have *our* best interests at heart, and their actions impose real costs on society, however large or small those may be. Denying that requires a zealotry of it's own, or at least willful blindness.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:Wait? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      And you think people with lack of bandwidth are happy about downloading 10GB+ games instead? Besides not every game is twitch sensitive and a 1-2Mbps link is perfectly adequate for most games. Sony and Microsoft are well known to be releasing cloud based game streaming services soon. SteamOS doesn't make a lick of sense unless it is ultimately intended as a platform for cloud gaming too.

    11. Re:Wait? by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      Have you ever stopped and pondered the fact that the same people that have issues downloading huge games are the same exact people that will get a terrible experience playing with "Cloud" games? From experience, OnLive was terrible. I have 100/25 fiber in my house, and almost every game had extremely noticeable input lag. Even though I had sub 50ms ping the whole time I was playing, it seemed like I was playing online with over 300ms ping. I could compete a 360 look with my mouse before my character on screen moved. The only thing that cloud gaming would be good for is turn based games... at least as it exists today and in the near future.

  15. Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fear I already know the answer to this but by chance is there a Netflix app?

    1. Re:Netflix by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      You'd have to hack around it with the usual solution (pipelight) for now, but NetFlix is re-writing their client to drop Silverlight and be fully HTML5. So, in the future it should work natively.

  16. Re:Fuck Valve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, I wasn't aware that Freeciv wasn't derivative.

  17. Re:Fuck Valve by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

    You are confusing the Free Software community with the Linux community.

    I'm quite sure the Free Software community still has your ideals and you will probably find some like minded individuals there. Over the past few years, the "Linux community" now includes millions of people who accept locked bootloaders as standard and install closed source apps from an app store whose goal is to collect as much information about them as possible.

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  18. Re:Fuck You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they pull the plug on thing in a couple years, so what?

    I had to double-check this when I read it. So people are now happy to buy disposable software that may not be able to be run when a company goes under? Is the concept of buying and keeping a program for life no longer sacrosanct? Sure, software can ultimately "die" due to being too old to run under a modern operating system, but virtual machines will extend that ability indefinitely. DRM-protected software has no such luxury.

    I can't believe that people consider gaming to be in the disposable pile of software (which is interesting because even with cheap sales, it all can add up to be pretty expensive) given there's still plenty of old games which a lot of people still play (Deus Ex is 12 years old, Doom is 20). Apparently if it's a game, it doesn't matter that you paid money for it if it might fail later due to a politically-enforced limitation. Yeah who cares, they're just games. Doesn't matter that once the trend is set it'll continue for other, more important programs like, I dunno, Adobe's now subscription-only Photoshop and Creative Suite tools.

    People really don't think about the future and long-term ramifications of things anymore it would seem. Must be a luxury in our fast-paced, time-poor society.

  19. I'm there!!! by BLToday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, seriously. I can totally justify spending around $350 for a HTPC with gaming to experiment with. Cheaper than my wife's purse.
    $150 - AMD A10-6800K (with mobo over at Microcenter). Yes, I know Intel is faster and it's not the fastest GPU either but for $150 it's hard to beat the combo.
    $80 - 8GB of RAM
    $100 - 3TB hard drive
    and I have a bunch of old ATX cases and power supply.

    It's Linux, if I don't like it I can always put something else on like Mint.

    1. Re:I'm there!!! by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Pft filthly lies. Everyone knows that it costs $4000 to build a gaming rig. /console fanboys

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:I'm there!!! by skine · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've been saving parts from old computers I've built for years with the intention of building a HTPC.

      Using this year's Christmas presents, I'll finally have enough parts to build one. So, for me, Valve has perfect timing.

    3. Re:I'm there!!! by aiadot · · Score: 0

      No offense but that "rig" is hardly a gaming one. As a PC and console gamer, spending more less than 800~1000 dollars on a gaming PC, specially if you're only gaming on a PC, feels like you're building a machine that with the worse of both worlds: The lack of power of consoles with the larger form factor and extra maintenance/knowhow/work required for a pc. Let alone the fact you won't be able to play many PC games at their full glory nor will enjoy any of the console exclusives. Unless you have a very limited and specific taste in non-demanding games and don't care how crappy a standard desktop PC looks in the TV rack, it's not really a good option.

    4. Re:I'm there!!! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Most of the PC enthusiast/gaming magazines have what they call their "baseline" or "minimal" machines at around the $1300 level.

      So yes, while there are guys who claim they game on a $600 machine, they're probably not playing at the high settings that most PC gamers claim are the reason to play on the PC in the first place.

      Besides, for $1300 you can buy a PS3 and $1000 worth of games. I've often made the joke that PC gamers play their LoL and de_dust over and over because they spent so much on their hardware that they have no money for games.

    5. Re:I'm there!!! by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Most of the PC enthusiast/gaming magazines have what they call their "baseline" or "minimal" machines at around the $1300 level.

      Spending $1300 to build a 'minimal' gaming machine. Ha-ha. You're funny.

    6. Re:I'm there!!! by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Most of the PC enthusiast/gaming magazines have what they call their "baseline" or "minimal" machines at around the $1300 level.

      Try about half of that. Or right around the cost of the "next gen" consoles, and will still be more powerful.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:I'm there!!! by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No offense but that "rig" is hardly a gaming one. As a PC and console gamer, spending more less than 800~1000 dollars on a gaming PC, specially if you're only gaming on a PC, feels like you're building a machine that with the worse of both worlds

      Yeah you should just stop right about now. Here's some fun facts, a 3 year top of the line PC is more powerful than the current generation of consoles. My 2 year old PC, which I build for $600 was ranked 3rd fastest in the world in the Phenom II X4 965/560ti category with WHQL drivers for roughly two weeks, without any baseline tweaks. I haven't benched out my current one, but that one ran me right around $500. And with that $500, I'm playing at 1080p, getting a nice steady 40-60fps, on a AMD X6 FX-6300 w/ Sapphire 7950.

      Now, if you're dropping $800-1k on something, and not beating the current generation of consoles you are: Buying from the wrong places, or live in a part of the world with massive import tariffs.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:I'm there!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, look at this n00b crying about how he's too cheap to afford a good computer, and even if he could, PCs are haaaaaaaard.

      This whole thread is about a new LINUX DISTRIBUTION, which isn't even a desktop OS. That means, often, not being able to run desktop apps on it. Really it's best used by game developers at this point, and I take it you are not among those happy few. In point of fact, it's pretty fucking obvious that you don't even know what you don't know about the subject, and your 3rd derivative of ignorance is also not looking too hot.

      Why don't you go off and play with your shiny box and let the grown-ups talk.

    9. Re:I'm there!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The A10-6800K is pretty slow though, expect at most about 1/4 the performance of a new generation console (XBONE/PS4).

    10. Re:I'm there!!! by aiadot · · Score: 1

      I said nothing about requiring $1000 to beat the current generation. $1000 is what I spend to play the games in their FULL GLORY, read 1440p60 and beyond. Is that really hard to understand?

    11. Re:I'm there!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's some overpriced alienware garbage I can's see how the baseline could be $1300.
      Maybe if you include a giant tv in the price, or if you get one of the top of the line video cards.
      And that would make it a high end system, not a base system.

    12. Re:I'm there!!! by boteeka · · Score: 1

      It is really interesting how quickly the world forgets.

      Prior to referring to screen resolutions as 720p or 1080p and the like, people actually used the pixel-count, like 1920×1440 for example. I know that 1080p also refers to the vertical pixel count (which in this case goes along with the 1920 horizontal pixel count), but somehow 1080p has been made to sound like the holy grail of resolutions, while in reality it is not so great. Especially compared to monitor screen resolutions from 5-10 years ago used by serious gamers.

      1080p for a game is just so-so even if your playing on a HDTV from just a couple of feet away.

      Just compare the total number of pixels per screen surface for different resolutions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_resolutions#Computer_graphics

    13. Re:I'm there!!! by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Even top of the line video cards don't inflate a system that much. People who build $600 PCs for gaming tend to spend about a third of the price on the video card. Everything else is pretty cheap.

    14. Re:I'm there!!! by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      1080p for a game is just so-so even if your playing on a HDTV from just a couple of feet away.

      Can't tell if trolling or really serious.

      Come on, now. 1080p is the max resolution of an HDTV (higher res is normally called 4K). Are you saying that you play games on your HDTV at higher resolutions than the max resolution? If your intention is to have a 4K monitor and sit reaally close to it to cover most of your field-of-view, then you're doing it wrong. It's cheaper and much better to have multiple monitors, since then you can curve them around you.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    15. Re:I'm there!!! by Krneki · · Score: 1

      A used Intel CPU and dedicated GPU is way faster then any AMD APU while still costing the same.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    16. Re:I'm there!!! by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      dunno about 1440p60 being full glory.

      IMHO 1920x1080p @ 120hz is my starter spec these days.

    17. Re:I'm there!!! by thelexx · · Score: 1

      Monitors used to be better than fucking tv's is the point. Now we've gotten retarded and gone backwards due to idiot box functions taking over most peoples understanding of what a computer display should be.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    18. Re:I'm there!!! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No, but I do play games at 2560x1440 pixels on a screen with that resolution.

      Why would I constrain myself to a mere 1920x1080? Shit, I had a quad core laptop with 1920x1200 in 2005.

    19. Re:I'm there!!! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Try about half of that

      half that is $650, still more than a PS4 or Xbox One.

      and will still be more powerful.

      Not on memory bandwidth, and most $650 dollar machines are dual or quad-core.

    20. Re:I'm there!!! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm a console gamer, it's what "THEY" say is a baseline machine, not me.

      http://www.maximumpc.com/build_pc_recommended_builds_october_2013

    21. Re:I'm there!!! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      http://www.maximumpc.com/build_pc_recommended_builds_october_2013

      The GPU and CPU alone on the "Baseline" machine costs more than a PS4.

    22. Re:I'm there!!! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      http://www.maximumpc.com/build_pc_recommended_builds_october_2013

      That's what "They" call a Baseline machine.

    23. Re:I'm there!!! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Really? Talk about getting ripped off hard and fast. I guess that's what you call "I can't spend a few hours, and figure out what I want on my own."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    24. Re:I'm there!!! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      half that is $650, still more than a PS4 or Xbox One.

      Yeah they're $600ish plus or minus a bit where I live.

      Not on memory bandwidth, and most $650 dollar machines are dual or quad-core.

      Not on memory bandwidth, but at $650 the machines are quad or six core.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    25. Re:I'm there!!! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Even on Slashdot, where people claim they game on $600 dollar machines, there's a few who say that if you do that you might as well not game on PC at all because that $600 machine is not a "real" gaming machine.

      So you might want to talk to the elitist jerks of the PC enthusiast community. Really, those "PC Master Race" guys are doing you guys no favors. While I like a PC game now and then, I dislike PC gamers as a community. For example the PC Diablo community is full of overly entitled whiners who can barely write standard english who decry "Sequelitis" on consoles while wanting Diablo 3 to have been EXACTLY like Diablo 2 but with better graphics. They argue over stupid shit and claim the game is dying even though it has lots of people playing it. There's also some Euro-gamers who want to turn Diablo into a free MMO-lite or LoL clone with guilds, 6vs6 PVP, etc etc. The Diablo 3 console gamers are actually more focused on simply playing and enjoying the game.

    26. Re:I'm there!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      monitors are still better than tvs, what u talkin bout?

    27. Re:I'm there!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only supports nvidia cards.

  20. Firday the 13th? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Did they pick that out or did it just fall that way.

    1. Re:Firday the 13th? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its my friggin birthday thats why they picked it.

  21. Re:Fuck You by smash · · Score: 1

    Except... pulling the plug in a couple of years would be corporate suicide.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  22. Make your own blackjack and hookers by tepples · · Score: 1

    You can always make your casino sim and your fishing sim and try to get them greenlit

  23. HDMI and USB through the wall by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why not get yourself a new midrange graphics card for your Linux box and just install the desktop Steam client?

    Because it's not always convenient to run long HDMI cables and a bunch of USB hubs from the computer desk through a wall to the TV. Or because one's existing Linux box is a laptop or small-form-factor desktop that doesn't take graphics cards.

    1. Re:HDMI and USB through the wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's not always convenient to run long HDMI cables and a bunch of USB hubs from the computer desk through a wall to the TV. Or because one's existing Linux box is a laptop or small-form-factor desktop that doesn't take graphics cards.

      so you get a big monitor for you pc, or even a TV as a primary or secondary monitor. for the $400 you spend on buying another PC you get a pretty decent HDTV. this idea that the living room is the only place where the tv is and that the only computer is some shared family desktop that lives in the study is so antiquated, that may have been true in the 90s but times changed (and they changed quite a while ago) when PCs (and the variety of other computing devices) got so damn cheap.

  24. Applications and apps are the same thing by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Applications were called apps for short long before iOS 2 introduced the App Store. See, for example, Unleashing the Killer App by Downes and Mui, first published in 2000.

    1. Re:Applications and apps are the same thing by Atomic+Fro · · Score: 2

      Here is a video of Steve Jobs saying "app" from 1992: Link!. Don't have to wait long, at 0:16 mark.

      --

      ==================
      Hippie Logger Jock
      ==================
    2. Re:Applications and apps are the same thing by xhrit · · Score: 1

      From the jargon file:

      killer app

      The application that actually makes a sustaining market for a promising but under-utilized technology. First used in the mid-1980s to describe Lotus 1-2-3 once it became evident that demand for that product had been the major driver of the early business market for IBM PCs. The term was then retrospectively applied to VisiCalc, which had played a similar role in the success of the Apple II. After 1994 it became commonplace to describe the World Wide Web as the Internet's killer app. One of the standard questions asked about each new personal-computer technology as it emerges has become âoewhat's the killer app?â

      http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/K/killer-app.html

  25. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by tepples · · Score: 1

    I also know for a fact that the HDMI out on my desktop/gaming system supports audio and 1080p to the TV. From there it's really trivial to set a desktop up [...] and put it on a TV.

    I've said this on Slashdot for years. But often, I've been told that the majority are unwilling to build or buy a second computer to dedicate to the TV. Whether computers that ship with SteamOS will change this is still unknown, but OUYA (an Android/Linux-based game console) hasn't made much of a dent.

  26. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're serious about gaming on linux, you recompiled the kernel with a scheduler more suitable for gaming. Do you think one scheduler is equally good for smart phones, desktop users, gamers, and servers? Steam OS kernel is probably better tuned than your distro's kernel.

  27. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    If you use a normal PC, nothing but inertia prevents the system from dual booting steamos and the desktop of your choice.

    If anything, running steamos beside a desktop linux with a shared /home would offer a great many perks.

    Just pick a default, and roll with it. When you want the other, just press one of the arrow keys on the grub(or whatever loader you like best) menu, then press enter.

    The purpose of steamos is not to replace the desktop; it is to replace a dedicated windows install, that exists only to play games on, but still eats up ginormous amounts of disk, requires constant mothering to protect it from malware, and does not play well with chained bootloaders.

    A stripped down linux for games only, akin to a console grade OS, would eat up considerably less disk than a windows partition, would not require the MS tax, would benefit (theoretically) from the improved securty *nix offers, and as a bonus could use the same data volume for /home as the desktop distro it dual boots beside.

    I play windows games with Wine on my Mint running i7 in the living room all the time. If I could keep my linux desktop more or less "clean" from wine and other library clutter, i'd be totally down with it. Having a maintained distro specifically for that purpose makes keeping it running well an easier task.

  28. Yes, inertia, literally by tepples · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you use a normal PC, nothing but inertia prevents the system from dual booting steamos and the desktop of your choice.

    And it is inertia that makes it so inconvenient. I mean this literally: a desktop computer at rest stays at rest unless acted on by an outside force, such as by being carried into another room. Most people don't want to have to move a desktop computer from the desk to the TV to play a game and then move it back to surf the web.

    my Mint running i7 in the living room

    You happen to have your computer desk in your living room. Not everybody else does. Some people keep the computer desk in another room in order to preserve some level of peace and quiet.

    1. Re: Yes, inertia, literally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No silly, I don't even use a desk.

      I have it hooked to the TV, have it hooked to the 4.1 surround system, and basically treat it like a game console as far as switching between it and the tv's tuner is concerned.

      Just use a wireless keyboard and mouse stuck to a with a tether, and a wireless game controller, and it's golden. Use a keyboard that has soft power, and its even sexier.

      The issue, is the idea that a desktop grade pc should be underneath a desk, and not discretely tucked away near an entertainment center.

      I don't know about you, but I use a desk all day at work, and when I want to use a computer on "me time", I prefer the recliner.

    2. Re:Yes, inertia, literally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because PC living room gaming isnt that advantageous. sure i could come up with reasons and anecdotes where it *is* advantageous but they obviously dont apply broadly which explains why most people dont have gaming pcs in their living room or move gaming pcs into their living rooms. steamos doesnt make the proposition any sweeter in fact with the new generation of consoles being more indie-friendly the steambox is even less appealing.

  29. Re:Fuck Valve by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    I've been using Linux a long time (15 years) and as my only desktop for the past 10 years. While I like and prefer the Freedom part, I much more prefer the stability, the free part, the plethora of apps that actually behave and just do what they are supposed to do, etc. IOW, I'd probably be a Mac user if you take monetary cost out of the calculation.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  30. Use of PC and TV simultaneously by tepples · · Score: 1

    and when I want to use a computer on "me time", I prefer the recliner.

    I want to agree with you. For a while, I ran my PC through an HDTV and put the keyboard on a tray table. But if your family's primary PC uses the living room TV as its monitor, then you can't watch TV while your kids are doing typed homework.

    1. Re:Use of PC and TV simultaneously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Options:

      1) living room TV == no computer attached, Man-cave TV == computer attached.
      2) kids get weak assed netbooks for doing homework on. (Yes billy, I KNOW it can barely run libre office. That's intentional.)
      3) stay single.

      The intended demographic for something like SteamOS is "gaming den". You don't normally have kids doing homework in a room filled with game consoles and game discs. It just doesn't work. :)

    2. Re:Use of PC and TV simultaneously by tepples · · Score: 1

      kids get weak assed netbooks

      I thought computer makers discontinued those in favor of tablets and Ultrabook laptops a year ago.

    3. Re: Use of PC and TV simultaneously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon tepples, you should know better than to believe FUD stories.

      Especially since you can still buy the things, now, a whole year later.
      look, it's an endangered species!

      I spent all of about 4 minutes looking. All it means is that production of that form factor isn't manstream. That's not surprising, because the need for a purposefully crippled laptop is a niche market to behin with. Thankfully it is a niche that many workplaces have a need for. We have 3 such netbooks on carts running PCDemis for use with mobile Romer CMM arms for instance. There's also the potential in educational settings and the like. The mainstream wants their devices to play candy crush, and play 1080p videos off youtube. The niche buyers DON'T want the device to do that, for many differing reasons. ;)

    4. Re:Use of PC and TV simultaneously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Family PC? I think I just fell into a time warp to the 1990s... Apparently the average teenager in the UK has 3-6 digital devices (as in, their OWN). So what is this family PC you speak of anyway?

    5. Re:Use of PC and TV simultaneously by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      Nah, not at all... Plenty of choice and they are now coming more and more on Sandy/Ivy bridge Celeron models. (Dropping the Atom. I was a huge Atom fan, but they do have a lot of downsides for the applications I wanted to use them) At my local supermarket netbooks tend to be Acer Aspire One. Those sold there are Celeron 847 based machines, which are relly quite good chips.

      Me? I went Ultra book, but only because I could get the Acer Aspire S3 for dirt cheap.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:Use of PC and TV simultaneously by tepples · · Score: 1

      So what is this family PC you speak of anyway?

      A PC owned by a parent who's not rich enough to buy a separate PC for all kids, especially single-digit-year-olds and preteens. Even in the 2010s, a lot of parents still aren't made of money.

    7. Re:Use of PC and TV simultaneously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is precisely this latter situation (I live in flyoverland, so the problem is quite prevalent here) that compels me to buy older, but perfectly servicable PCs at garage sales.

      You know, the ones that have windows XP or the like on them, and are so packed full of shit like cool web search that they cant even gasp for air when powered on?
      Yeah, those. Nothing to write home to mommy about, but you can get the whole system for about the price of a new keyboard. Slap a no-nonsense desktop linux on, and these become nearly ideal candidates for "Child's homework computer" for such people. For a time, I handed such things out like candy. All the people in that circumstance that I know have already received such toys though, but I fully understand what you are getting at.

      It's just that there is more than one way to get access to another computer on the cheap. Sadly, it requires either being a computer nerd or being on good terms with one that is willing to help them out.

      I sometimes wonder if there is room for an analog of a foodbank for technology in the given age.

    8. Re:Use of PC and TV simultaneously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently bought a brand new 15" HP laptop with a dual core AMD CPU, 2GB RAM and 500GB hard drive for $199. You don't have to go for netbooks to get a PC for cheap.

  31. Why go with anything Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Valve's Steam OS/etc. is the epitome of DRM ridden software on the market... I do not see why anyone in their right would want to continue funding these people by buying games on their platforms.

    They legally shouldn't even be calling it "buying games" on Steam... you're buying LICENSES only.

    Go with GOG.com or even Origin as you would get a hell of a lot better customer services, refunds, and you wouldn't be buying licenses but the actual games themselves, at least in the case of GOG.

    1. Re:Why go with anything Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Origin".....all credibility lost right there.

      Steam is the 9000 lb elephant in the room for good reason. Gabe jokes aside, I won't even bother to list why.

    2. Re:Why go with anything Steam? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Hates Steam for DRM. Recommends Origin. Hahahahaha....

      And after 8 hours of downloading, downloading patches, downloading more patches and then constantly downloading over 8Gb for one game that I never got installed (freebie with an indie bundle) I gave up. Never seen such a shoddy, bitty interface and download structure (not to mention speed).

      I have several big games on Origin that I've redeemed from bundles, etc. and I honestly don't care enough to install it again.

    3. Re:Why go with anything Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They legally shouldn't even be calling it "buying games" on Steam... you're buying LICENSES only.

      Go with GOG.com or even Origin as you would get a hell of a lot better customer services, refunds, and you wouldn't be buying licenses but the actual games themselves, at least in the case of GOG.

      Really?

      From GOG's EULA

      1.License. Company grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use the Program, but retains all property rights in the Program and all copies thereof. This Program is licensed, not sold, for your personal, non-commercial use. Your license confers no title or ownership in this Program and should not be construed as any sale of any rights in this Program.

    4. Re:Why go with anything Steam? by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Origin do refund games _if you don't like them_. Steam won't refund utterlly broken trash games, except "War Z" which was a disaster. It happened with X:Rebirth very recently: people edit XML savegame to progress through the story. Some others CTD on startup. Steam support won't refund, they say you used the software for 2 hours so they can't and won't, it's alpha quality at best sold 50 USD. Origin would refund, Amazon would refund, Steam tells you to GTFO. I was a rabid Steam fan once, no longer.

    5. Re:Why go with anything Steam? by higuita · · Score: 1

      yes, Origin is a sad excuse of DRM system... looking at desura and steam, it's so easy to work with... with Origin, it's a never ending install saga of apps (all full of spyware, just check your firewall logs) and then to play, you have to open the browser and install even more plugins (again heavy and with all sort of tracking).

      Those guys need to trash it all and learn that KISS is (and stop trying to spy/track their users)

      --
      Higuita
    6. Re:Why go with anything Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the sales they give, when you buy a game released a month ago at 50% off, they would be bleeding money if they let people refund them.

    7. Re:Why go with anything Steam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. And that legitimizes Steam how exactly?
       
      I don't know if you're doing it to be a troll or you're just so obtuse but just because someone does the same thing as someone else but only worse doesn't mean the other person isn't guilty of doing something bad.
       
      The lessor of two evils argument will turn you into a slave.

  32. Steam OS? Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROX-r_kHPks

  33. Used is more than "desu" spelled backward by tepples · · Score: 1

    Thankfully [the netbook] is a niche that many workplaces have a need for

    Thank you for finding that Toshiba netbook. I'm glad to know that more than just a minority of hardcore geeks have a use for an ultraportable 10" laptop like the Dell Inspiron mini 1012 that I'm typing this comment on, even if it does compromise CPU power. And no, I don't have a problem running LibreOffice on Xubuntu on this netbook. But what worries me on that page is the word "Used". What happens once all the still-working used netbooks on Amazon are bought up?

    1. Re: Used is more than "desu" spelled backward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but amazon is also a mainstream internet market.

      Eventually, about the only places you will find netbook class systems will be in industry-focused sale offerings, since the general public is by-and-large not interested in such things.

      Toshiba is likely to continue making low-powered devices, but perhaps not at the 200$ price point. Take for instance, their "military grade" toughbook line. (Not the consumer line; I mean the ones intended for use inside hummers and police cars.)

      You get the added bonus of getting one that can be dropped off a 1 story building that way. Not 200$, but still netbook classification in terms of horsepower and battery life.

    2. Re: Used is more than "desu" spelled backward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      panasonic, my bad

      Again, not 200$, but servicing a niche market that won't be going away any time soon. Not the prettiest devices, but they aren't built to be pretty. Go for their "semi-rugged" offerings for that. These re made to literally be bullet proof.

    3. Re:Used is more than "desu" spelled backward by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What happens once all the still-working used netbooks on Amazon are bought up?

      Then you buy chromebooks. They are sold at a similar price point (the low-end ones anyway) and will generally run full-fledged Linux, or in some cases even other operating systems.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Used is more than "desu" spelled backward by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      What happens once all the still-working used netbooks on Amazon are bought up?

      I'm pretty sure you can still find 'em... this one for example is on sale this week, for damn near netbook prices. Yes, it's about $100 more than most netbooks cost, but it's in the price range of a midrange tablet, and it has a keyboard.

      If you prefer something cheaper, you could, you know, buy a tablet and a bluetooth keyboard for less.

      And failing that, there are always chromebooks. That was my plan for my next ultraportable... buy a 13" chromebook, wipe the drive, and install my Linux of choice....

    5. Re:Used is more than "desu" spelled backward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you go to walmart and buy either the HP or the ASUS little 10" still being sold for ~$180-200?

  34. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a computer to dedicate to the TV? The only reason I HAVE a TV is to have a bigger monitor for my already existing computer... Why else would anyone own a TV in 2013 anyway? To pay $100+ a month to cable companies for a pathetic selection of material to watch (interspersed with commercials every 5 minutes)?

    Though, thinking about it now, if one WERE to still be paying for cable, I see how dropping a few hundred bucks on an extra computer would be out of the question...if you're lucky, after paying the average cable bill, you can also feed your kids...

  35. Great, one step closer to broken games on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steam's ok for the cautious buyer, but featuring pre-alpha quality titles full of bugs at AAA game prices won't fly with Joe Average.

  36. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by DrXym · · Score: 1

    I expect Linux is largely an irrelevance here since most of the games are going to be streaming from somewhere else. Of course Valve might encourage game devs to port their game to Linux to benefit from cheaper hosting fees if they release a cloud based platform and that might trickle down to native versions of those same apps.

  37. Re:Fuck Valve by higuita · · Score: 1

    I'm a linux user and a free software supporter... i try to install everything as free as possible, even the graphic card drivers.
    I try to use FLOSS games (and there are many that are fun!) but also play closed ones. If i have the game without DRM (from humblebundle or desura), i will prefer it, if not, the steam DRM isn't that bad... It would be better without any DRM, but steam is very transparent and most users will never see that it even exists.

    Right now it's better to have DRM games than no games at all. Going from a totally closed platform (windows and other consoles) with DRM to a open platform with DRM is a step in the right direction. After people/games start ditch windows, the DRM problem can be fixed, specially by the "wallet voting" (ie: stop buying DRM games)

    Anyway, game jump from windows to linux is important enough to allow some slack, specially if the main problem is the transparent steam DRM

    --
    Higuita
  38. BlaBlaOS by Polizei · · Score: 1

    Fuck this shit. I'm still playing Super Mario on my 8-bit Nintendo!

  39. Re:Fuck Valve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not to mention Nethack being a Rogue clone, and Star Control 2 being a sequel. Nothing derivative whatsoever.

  40. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

    [citation needed]

    --
    for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
  41. Re:Fuck Valve by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Gaming is kiddy shit (sorry) and it's naive to expect much idealism from from the core audience.

    Not that you're not a known troll, but there are now more adult gamers than juvenile ones*, and gaming now brings in more money than movies.

    For Linux to reach a larger audience means catering to portions of that audience who just want free stuff.

    Oddly, it also means catering to the portions of that audience who just want to give away free stuff.

    * According to a 2007 Pew Internet & American Life Project Survey, more than half (53 percent) of American adults play video games, and about one in five adults (21%) play every day or almost every day.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  42. Re:Fuck Valve by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Over the past few years, the "Linux community" now includes millions of people who accept locked bootloaders as standard and install closed source apps from an app store whose goal is to collect as much information about them as possible.

    Users have outnumbered developers at least since Slackware. Build a bridge, and clamber over it awkwardly.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. Furniture by tepples · · Score: 1

    so you get a big monitor for you pc

    And furniture to sit on, compared to the existing sofa in the room with the TV.

  44. A "solution" in search of... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2

    a problem. I must have missed people hating on their Xbox, Playstation, Wii and more generally pc's.

    1. Re:A "solution" in search of... by severn2j · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded down? Reliance on Windows is exactly why SteamOS is being developed and is personally my main reason for wanting to try it..

    2. Re:A "solution" in search of... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Please get real. Linux, BSD, etc all have their roles to play but to pretend for a moment that you will make better use of your hardware is a tremendous reach. Please find me any hardware that does not have first and foremost drivers and associated software written for windows. And as to bloat.. linux + kde or gnome are easily on a par with win 8.

  45. Kernel version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Being a kernel developer I am interested in what there kernel tree looks like. I assume that it is just a recent 3.10 stable or something with some extra drivers and the odd patch in the arch.

    But I am curious/hopeful to see if they have done any fine tuning/performance enhancements.

  46. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why else would anyone own a TV in 2013 anyway? To pay $100+ a month to cable companies for a pathetic selection of material to watch (interspersed with commercials every 5 minutes)?

    Because live professional and collegiate sports tend to be blacked out online.

  47. Mods by tepples · · Score: 1

    Are the eighth-generation consoles also friendly to community-produced game mods, or is the publisher of a game the only entity allowed to make mods for that game? Without Half-Life modding there would have been no Counter-Strike.

    1. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you dont need a pc in the living room to build game mods, you can already do that on a non living room pc.

    2. Re:Mods by tepples · · Score: 1

      You do if the mod is for a game in a living room genre, such as a character mod for a fighting game.

  48. Re:Indeed. The thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one advantage of the steam OS vs. regular OS + steam client:

    Pared down dependencies ( RAM / CPU cycles "wasted" on non-gaming stuff) and ( probably ) up to date MESA / video drivers with the latest performance boosts.

    Possibly kernel tuning for games as well - scheduler, frequency polling, interrupt-able / pre-emptable ETC.

  49. Boooo by nightsky30 · · Score: 1

    "SteamOS Will Be Available For Download On December 13"

    Still no SteamOS :(

  50. Can't seem to see a download? by Mirar · · Score: 1

    Did I miss it since it's no longer the 13th? I can't seem to find a download link anywhere.