Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Says Garage Fire Not Charger's Fault; Firemen Less Sure

cartechboy writes "It looks like Elon Musk and Tesla Motors find themselves in another PR war over the cause of a fire involving a Tesla Model S. Authorities in Irvine, CA are currently investigating the reason for a fire in a garage that, yes, contained a Tesla Model S. While the actual cause of the fire remains unknown, Tesla Motors and the Orange County Fire Authority are already publicly disputing possible causes, thought to center around the Tesla charging system. Tesla says the fire was not caused by any part of the car nor its charging system, reports Reuters. For what its worth — we've seen a version of this movie before. In 2011, investigators determined that a garage fire that destroyed a Chevrolet Volt had started away from the car, later spreading to engulf and destroy the car."

36 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Musk's Hubris... by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is where Musk's Hubris is going to be a problem.

    There's no way that he can know for sure what happened in the fire, and he's going to risk having to eat crow -- lots and lots of crow -- if he's proven wrong.

    I love the guy, but hubris is clearly among his worst qualities.

    1. Re:Musk's Hubris... by hsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More annoying is anything having to do with Tesla is apparently news. Car crashes? Front page news!

    2. Re:Musk's Hubris... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When it's a fledgling industry who successes or failures could have ramifications for years to come, and who has people actively trying to discredit, because it's success will damage their outdated business model, than yes, it's news.

    3. Re:Musk's Hubris... by hawguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Musk's Hubris? Is that some new cologne?

    4. Re:Musk's Hubris... by tippe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, I've heard that Musk's hubris is very large (heh, heh, heh), but perhaps he does have a point. According to the article, all the damage was done at the wall connection (not the car connection), and a review of the car logs indicated that charging was proceeding normally at the time the fire started.

      I'm going to make an assumption here that the tesla charger was probably safety tested[1] and approved for sale by UL, but what about the installation itself? Maybe California is different than the rest of North America, but most garages aren't natively wired with 240V sockets (quit laughing, you Europeans). So who did the 240V installation? The home owner or a certified electrician? Was it inspected? The article certainly doesn't say. Knowing how previous Tesla fire stories have been pounced on by the media, I'd probably do the same if I were in Elon's shoes and say the problem had nothing to do with the charger, and would change my tune later on if it turned out to be true. It wouldn't be the first time that crappy wiring has caused a house fire, and I don't think it's necessarily wrong for him to point this out.

      [1] Not that safety testing means that a unit failure can't happen, but they do check (or should check, if they are doing their jobs right) that the design is robust to various abnormal conditions, and that fail-safes are built into the product to prevent fires or other dangerous conditions in the event of a malfunction. However, all the safety testing on earth won't save you from a shitty installation...

    5. Re:Musk's Hubris... by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I guarantee you that at least one modern generation Mustang has been destroyed in a garage fire. Heck, it might have even caused it (there are certainly ways for gasoline engines to catch on fire after they are parked), but it's not really news. You wouldn't have heard about it except maybe on page 37 of section D of the local paper where it goes "home damaged by fire" in the police report section.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:Musk's Hubris... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is where Musk's Hubris is going to be a problem.

      There's no way that he can know for sure what happened in the fire, and he's going to risk having to eat crow -- lots and lots of crow -- if he's proven wrong.

      I love the guy, but hubris is clearly among his worst qualities.

      You're charging it wrong.

      What I find completely unbelievable in this story is that someone in California actually has their car in a garage.

      Your garage is where you keep all the stuff you can't fit into the house.

      The street is where you keep your car.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Musk's Hubris... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      The fire authority didn't blame the car. Here's the quote from the article:

      The Fire Authority, however, released a report stating that the fire occurred "as a result of an electrical failure in the charging system for an electric vehicle".

      Fire broke out in the garage on the campus of the University of California-Irvine on November 15. The blaze was noted by the car's owner just before 3 am, and it was promptly extinguished by fire crews.

      The incident caused up to $25,000 of damage, though the Model S itself sustained only light smoke damage. Nobody in the house was injured.

      While the Fire Authority's report stated the most likely cause was a "high resistance connection at the wall socket or the Universal Mobile Connector from the Tesla charging system", Tesla says its own data shows the car was charging normally, with no fluctuations in the temperature and no malfunctions capable of causing a fire.

      Tesla also notes that the car's charging cable was fine where it was connected to the car, and was damaged only on the wall side. This could suggest issues with the building's electrical supply, rather than with the vehicle.

      This doesn't completely rule out the charging system. The fire was started between the wall socket and the charger.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    8. Re:Musk's Hubris... by jandrese · · Score: 2

      It's statistics. Garage fires are not uncommon, and Ford has manufactured a lot of Mustangs since 2007. The two are pretty much guaranteed to meet at some point.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:Musk's Hubris... by icebike · · Score: 2

      The fire was started between the wall socket and the charger.

      It says no such thing. You seem to practice selective reading.

      This could suggest issues with the building's electrical supply, rather than with the vehicle.

      The high resistance connection was most likely inside the wall socket, usually bad connections of the house wiring, or undersized wiring.
      This is very typical of aluminum wiring. Although the mainstream press won't report that even if it is discovered to be such.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Musk's Hubris... by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The conspiracy of the mainstream media to hide the dangers of aluminum wiring from us?

      Sounds like the sort of thing I might have in my house that could kill my children... ...tonight at 11.

    11. Re:Musk's Hubris... by Wookact · · Score: 2

      They would not have recalled 3.4 million vehicles if none of them caught fire. Your contention is wrong. Teslas are receiving a disproportionate amount of coverage over this. This may be because they are electric, but claiming the coverage is not disproportionate is silly. We did not see weekly articles concerning every ford fire in 2007 but we get them for the Teslas.

    12. Re:Musk's Hubris... by dugancent · · Score: 2

      Aluminum wire, before it was phased out, was front page news on every newspaper on the country and the first story the nightly news. It was, and is, a well known problem.

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    13. Re:Musk's Hubris... by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

      ...UL is just a baseline safety test done against test units. It doesn't mean it's a robust design...

      I work for a company that got UL approval for a device.

      For our product, UL did look over our designs. They have some rules, for example, about how safety interlocks should be designed. You have to either use previously UL approved switches and sensors, or submit your sensors for approval. You cannot have software in the safety loop. Ex: You can't have software that monitors the voltage then sends a shut-off command to a relay. The sensor must be electronically connected to the shut-off. FPGAs are okay sometimes - they don't call that software.

      I'm not sure what classes of devices this applies to though.

    14. Re:Musk's Hubris... by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "It is just limited to systems above 50A draw."

      If it's not safe for 20A house circuits (I know of many Aluminum Romex cables that have fried in-wall,) why in the world would it be considered safe for 50A or higher, unless the wire was incredibly thick?

      "So your electric or induction stove. yea that is probably wired with aluminum."

      Brand-new model. 100% copper wiring excepting the heating elements and brass connections for the wiring/plug, internal and external.

      "The main supply lines for your home yep aluminum too."

      Of such an incredibly heavy gauge for the relatively little amperage being fed to my place.

      " You have a sub panel, that is most likely being feed with aluminum."

      Brand-new panel, pure copper buses, including the Main. GE 150A panel, GE 40A sub.

      " it wouldn't be hard to guess that the installer used aluminum even if the instructions say not to feed it with aluminum as I have seen that far to often"

      That would not pass an inspection if it's labeled as such - which means it wasn't properly inspected in the first place and the person doing it was an idiot. I hope you aren't trusting these people. You know why we don't mix copper and aluminum? Risk of fire from high resistance junctions. NEC only allows anything like this for service entrance runs or short-distance subpanel connection, and only if two conditions are met:

      A. Mechanical termination (No wire nuts, no soldering, no clips. It must be screwed in place.)
      B. The panel bolts and lugs are rated for aluminum wire.

      Some jurisdictions go even further and require anti-oxidation paste be applied to the lug and wire at the terminal.

      We've got a Master Electrician that handles the repairs and changeouts on the chargers for our forklifts at work. You know what his rule is for using Aluminum? Use Copper Instead.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re: Musk's Hubris... by Eskarel · · Score: 2

      It's because Musk is a massive publicity whore with a tremendously thin skin. Anything happens with a Tesla anywhere in the world that isn't perfectly positive he has to comment.

  2. On the other hand by suso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Garage fires aren't a very common topic on Slashdot.

  3. Re:Oily rags by D1G1T · · Score: 2

    While this is usually the cause of garage fires, I'll bet it is less likely in garages that store vehicles that use neither oil nor gasoline.

  4. Sometimes its the wiring not the device ... by perpenso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even if it is the charger it may be the wiring not the device itself. A friend had an attic fire that was caused by a hallway smoke detector (AC powered) of all things. The fire investigator determined the smoke detector was wired incorrectly.

    1. Re:Sometimes its the wiring not the device ... by Carnivore · · Score: 2

      It may be terminology missing; In actual fact all the charging equipment is onboard the car, but the fire officials may be referring the the exterior power cable as "the charger" especially if it's Tesla's High Power Wall Connector. The abbreviation for that, HPWC, could reasonably be assumed to mean High Power Wall Charger.

  5. Re:Oily rags by Russ1642 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always keep my linseed oil soaked rags piled up together in a nice dry place covered in sawdust.

  6. Re:Oily rags by weilawei · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not a bad guess (still, I'll wait for the official report) in a garage, since most people don't seem to realize that an oily rag will if left for a few hours. You can try it yourself.

  7. Re:Oily rags by weilawei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whoops, butchered that comment. Meant to say an oily rag will spontaneously ignite if left for a few hours. You can try it yourself.

  8. clickbait headline by Chalex · · Score: 5, Informative

    "garage fire started by improperly installed electrical outlet" just doesn't get you as many clicks.

    The garage fire was Nov 15, the Tesla S did not sustain any damage. The damage was all on the wall socket side.

  9. The linked article is crap, anyone got the report? by weilawei · · Score: 2

    "The fire occurred as a result of an electrical failure in the charging system for an electric vehicle," said a report by the fire authority, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters.

    The report also emphasizes that the cause of the fire is unclear.

  10. Re:Oily rags by TheCarp · · Score: 2

    Is the oil used in cars usually involved in those kinds of fires? I thought those were usually more caused by things like linseed oil: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linseed_oil#Spontaneous_combustion

    Never heard of anyone using linseed oil in their crank case.

    Normally improper disposal of motor oil may make a fire situation worst, but doesn't, as far as I know, tend to cause them. Whereas, improper disposal of rags soaked in linseed oil (normally used in paints) has been the primary cause of a few fires.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  11. Damage on the wall side by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the cable was damaged at the wall side but not the car side, my immediate thought is a problem in the wall socket or wiring. I've run into that with regular outlets, old hardware causes high resistance and a very hot outlet and plug (thermal conduction through the metal parts). The most common cause is age causing corrosion of the connection plates inside the socket or looseness of the plates so the prongs of the plug don't make good tight contact with them. Either way it raises the resistance of the connection inside the socket and creates a lot of heat (it's doing exactly what the heating elements on an electric stove do). My fix is to open up the outlet and replace the socket with a new one, cleaning up and tightening the wires in the process.

    The #2 problem is the actual in-wall wiring being old and just not up to gauge for the current draw of modern electronics. In 1970 we didn't have home computers and Xboxes and the like, 14-gauge wiring was common and hooking up a modern home-entertainment center and computer would have the wiring in the wall hot to the touch. Plug a Tesla into older wiring like that and you've got a fire waiting to happen.

  12. Re:Gas vs Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personally I never let electricity be used unless it is under my direct supervision. Whenever I run the A/C, I go outside and watch the compressor unit until it has cooled the house down. Likewise, whenever I need hot water I go out in the garage, manually turn the water heater on, and wait until the water is completely heated. I throw the main breaker and remove the power meter from the side of the house every time before going to work, the store, etc.

    You just can't be too safe nowadays.

  13. Just like an IPhone by MobSwatter · · Score: 2

    This is why you don't use an aftermarket charger!

  14. Tesla is fighting a war by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A war over public opinion. I don't know why the struggling U.S. automakers have not embraced electric vehicles. They will make a "zombie" truck which everyone thinks is funny, but nobody actually wants. But tend to be disposed to doing everything in their power to resist that which is (probably) better for the environment and more efficient for a good portion of the population commuting just a few miles every day. Did they learn nothing from the Nissan Leaf sales?

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  15. Re:Oily rags by weilawei · · Score: 2

    Nope, they're printed using PLA on giant RepRaps. ;)

  16. Is Tesla a Continuous Load? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    NEC requires derating circuits with continuous loads to 80% of their breaker value, so a 15A circuit can only provide 12A on a continuous basis (which by NEC definition is more than 3 hours).

    If Tesla takes more than 12A for more than 3 hours, then by law it cannot be charged from a standard home wall socket, which is a 14AWG branch circuit rated for 15A at the breaker.

    If Tesla overlooked this requirement and put a 15A plug on their charging cable, then they are liable for any damage caused by their improper cable plug selection and lack of warnings.

  17. A Whole Nother Bunch Of Points by sabinelr · · Score: 2

    FTA, the car owner said she set "the timer" to start charging at midnight. Where is this timer, in the car or on the charger connection? Maybe she is using one of those $4 light timers. Does anyone know if the Tesla can turn on its own charging system at some designated time? For that matter, how does the Tesla know what time it is? The fire department might be familiar with historic causes of fires, but (1) hardly any fireman knows anything about electricity as such, and (2) they could scarcely know anything about garage fires associated with electric cars, since so far we only know of somewhere in the vicinity of one happening.

  18. cruise control element fires in garages by clay_shooter · · Score: 2

    Pickup trucks did catch fire in the garages. The cruise control stayed live when the car was off. Some rubber part could get a hole in it. Gas would leak through onto the live circuit causing a fire. There were sever pretty burned out garage pictures during that time. It didn't make a big splash because no one got hurt.

  19. Re:Oily rags by vux984 · · Score: 2

    When was the last time you changed the oil in your ceiling fan? Your blender? CD player?

    Hell, when was the last time you "changed the oil" in the wheel bearings of your car?

    Yes, all these things require lubricant, but they are not things we associate with having substantial oil reservoirs.

    As for the the Tesla, yes it'll have wheel bearings and axels, so it'll probably have a bit of grease somewhere... but I don't believe it has a transmission. So there probably isn't anything that's we'd recognize as "oil" in the car.