Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

DHS Turns To Unpaid Interns For Nation's Cyber Security

Posted by Soulskill on from the probably-still-an-upgrade dept.

theodp writes "A week after President Obama stressed the importance of computer science to America, the Department of Homeland Security put out a call for 100+ of the nations' best-and-brightest college students to work for nothing on the nation's cyber security. The unpaid internship program, DHS notes, is the realization of recommendations (PDF) from the Homeland Security Advisory Council's Task Force on CyberSkills, which included execs from Facebook, Lockheed Martin, and Sony, and was advised by representatives from Cisco, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Northrop Grumman, the NSF, and the NSA. 'Do you desire to protect American interests and secure our Nation while building a meaningful and rewarding career?' reads the job posting for Secretary's Honors Program Cyber Student Volunteers (salary: $0.00-$0.00). 'If so, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is calling.' Student volunteers, DHS adds, will begin in spring 2014 and participate throughout the summer. Get your applications in by January 3, kids!"

19 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Stick with what works... by pubwvj · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ooo! Outsiders worked so well before! Snow-den! Snow-den! What fun.

    1. Re:Stick with what works... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ooo! Outsiders worked so well before! Snow-den! Snow-den! What fun.

      If youi're taking a snipe at contractors vs govt personnel here on this one, there really isn't much a difference in the loyalty or trustworthiness of the two.

      If you're working on something security related, you have to sign the same forms saying you're liable to the same laws and penalties if you divulge secrets, etc.

      It isn't like the govt. worker is held to any standards higher than the contractor is, if working on the same system/data.

      And a secret clearance background check isn't any more thorough for a govt employee than it is for a contractor, they pretty much use the same exact methods and entities for them.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Stick with what works... by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Informative

      Show me a single congressman (house or senate) that left "public service" poorer than they started.

      Harry Truman. When he ended his 2nd term, all he had was his old WW1 Army pension to fall back on.

      This contains an interesting summary of Truman's salary history.

      • In 1921 Truman's salary was probably close to nothing. He was living in debt and trying to keep his failing business open.
      • In 1922 he was elected Missouri's Jackson County judge and was paid $3,465.00 per year.
      • In 1925 Truman lost reelection and took a job selling AAA automobile club memberships for $15.00 each...
      • In 1926 he was elected as the presiding judge and was paid $6,000.00 per year.
      • In 1934 Truman was elected senator and made $10,000.00 a year.
      • In 1944 he was chosen to be the Roosevelt's third vice-president. His salary jumped to $20,000.00 per year.
      • In 1945 ... Truman became the President of the United States. His salary was $75,000.00 and then increased $100,000.00 a year
      • In 1954 he sold the rights to his biography for $600,000.00 which would be paid over 5 years, and in 1958 Congress passed a law to retroactively provide former presidents a pension of $25,000.00 a year.

      So, he went into public service making about zero, starting with a judicial position at $3465 a year. He left the Presidency and started a military pension at $13500 a year. He then picked up another $25k a year retroactively starting in 1954.

      I'd say going from zero to $38k a year is not leaving public service poorer than he started. It's not the lavish pensions pols get today, but it's still not poorer.

      As for political donations for personal use, the same source reports:

      He continued paying down the debt, even while the Great Depression was occurring, until 1934 when a political supporter bought his debt allowed him to pay it off for $1,000.00.

      So, a political supporter donated a huge sum by buying the existing debt on the new Senator's failed clothing store and letting him pay it off cheap.

    3. Re:Stick with what works... by volxdragon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Federal civil service workes haven't had a pension in decades - CSRS was closed to new government workers in 1987, all they get now is FERS which really is no different than any other 401(k). The days of the government pension are pretty much dead (unless you're a congress critter that is).

  2. There's a disconnect here by phoenix03 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "...100+ of the nations' best-and-brightest college students.."
    "..to work for nothing"

    Boy. Can't imagine how they could say no to that.

  3. Well worth it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    $0 is a great price for being shunned by your peers for the rest of your life.

  4. Evil Plot by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sometimes I wonder if unpaid internships are just part of a sinister plot to keep the class divide as large as possible. In college I knew lots of really bright people who had to skip internships because they had to do things like work so they could pay for school and, well, eat.

    I know that they are not intended that way, but it is one of the side issues with the 'internship' culture, they tend to be a step based off how much cash you have that can have major effects on your long term career options.

    1. Re:Evil Plot by realmolo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's exactly what this is.

      The position requires a security clearance, for God's sake! This is an internship for the children of congressman and other highly-placed public officials (and, of course, children of big donors to the Republican and/or Democratic parties). Nothing will get accomplished, but a lot of rich kids will get to put it on their resume.

  5. What happened to minimum wage? by BoRegardless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thought that was exploitive and slave like to use unpaid interns.

  6. Also relevants... by phoenix03 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This position requires a Security Clearance of SECRET. SO, let me get this straight. Unpaid, FULL TIME, college age, best and brightest... with access to secret level items...

    Nevermind. This is a great idea. What could possibly go wrong?

  7. Simple reason they are unpaid by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It ensures only the ideologically pure will come to work for them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. Reminds Me Of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...during the Clinton years, but before the Monica Lewinski scandal where government would place ads in newspapers and certain periodicals asking for interns. The ads mentioned something along the lines of "gain experience under the nation's leaders". After the Monica scandal, this bit of wording was changed.

  9. The REAL job by Akratist · · Score: 4, Funny

    "hey...wait...this looks like the Obamacare website..."

  10. It's definitely a problem here by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DHS is clustered heavily in DC and the areas immediately outside of DC within the beltway. The cost of moving to this area just to work could easily add $10k-$12k in debt or lost savings for just a single summer. This is simply not an internship that makes sense for any student who comes from a family lacking real wealth.

  11. Sounds like a career killer to me by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Put that experience on a resume and you're likely to see more rejections than you would expect normally. There was a time when "government job" meant something but now it means something else entirely to a growing number of people and businesses out there. Things are getting polarized. Working and living in the DC area showed me exactly how polarized they are even 3-4 years ago.

  12. So let me get this straight... by Zephyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You want to offer a bunch of impressionable young people, most of whom are accumulating large amounts of debt, the opportunity to learn as much as they can about the computer security infrastructure of the country. While they do this, we're not paying them a cent or giving them any guarantees regarding future employment, further increasing their financial insecurity in the present and the future, as well as exploiting whatever sense of loyalty they might feel for their country for the purpose of reducing government labor costs.

    What could possibly go wrong?

  13. Is this a Labor Law violation? by peterofoz · · Score: 4, Informative
    If they're displacing regular employees or they derive immediate advantage from the activities of the intern...

    6 Legal Requirements For Unpaid Internship Programs

  14. Get your security clearance before graduation ... by perpenso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why in the hell would you have a limited time internship that requires a secret level clearance that will probably take the UNPAID intern months to get? Seems like a ton of hassle for very little reward.

    Because it gets you that security clearance before graduation. When you and your peers begin applying for jobs after graduation you have an advantage, you already have security clearance.

  15. Kinda reads like a "Who's Who" from Hell by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "which included execs from Facebook, Lockheed Martin, and Sony, and was advised by representatives from Cisco, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Northrop Grumman, the NSF, and the NSA."

    Aren't these chuckleheads a good representation of all that is evil and corrupt and driving Team USA into the ground?