Slashdot Mirror


A Year With Google Glass

Mat Honan, a writer for Wired, has posted an article detailing his takeaways from long-term use of Google Glass. He makes particular note of how the device's form factor is much more offensive to others than the actual technology contained within. For example, his wife wanted him to take pictures and shoot videos of their child's birth, but not with Glass: "It was the way Glass looked. It might let me remain in the moment, but my wife worried it would take her out of it, that its mere presence would be distracting because it’s so goddamn weird-looking." It can get unpleasant when strangers are involved: "People get angry at Glass. They get angry at you for wearing Glass. They talk about you openly. It inspires the most aggressive of passive aggression. ... Wearing Glass separates you. It sets you apart from everyone else. It says you not only had $1,500 to plunk down to be part of the “explorer” program, but that Google deemed you special enough to warrant inclusion (not everyone who wanted Glass got it; you had to be selected). Glass is a class divide on your face." Honan found most of the default software to be handy, but the third-party software to be lacking. Glass also facilitated his unintentional switch from an iPhone to an Android phone. He ends the piece by warning of the inevitability of devices like Glass: "The future is on its way, and it is going to be on your face. We need to think about it and be ready for it in a way we weren’t with smartphones."

26 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. "Class Divide"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No dumbass, we just don't like you aiming a camera and microphone at everywhere you look.

    1. Re: "Class Divide"? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yea, I was going to point out that his 'class divide' theory was nothing more than ego masturbation. In reality, people don't like having video cameras for Megacorp pointed at them at every interaction or passing by of a glasshole.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    2. Re:"Class Divide"? by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Class Divide"?

      You're thinking of socio-economic class. This is a little different. It separates the class of people stupid and rude enough to walk around wearing Google Glass from the class of people who aren't.

    3. Re:"Class Divide"? by DrLang21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wish I had mod points. This is the fundamental problem with Google Glass. One of the things that allows polite society to function is that, generally, if we make a slip of the tongue or do something stupid that we immediately regret it will be soon forgotten. Public life is only semi-public in that it is contained to a small area. However, as we are already starting to see, when everything is captured and recorded for prosterity, no one ever forgets and society is extrodinarily slow to forgive despite the fact that most everyone has been just as guilty at some point in time.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    4. Re:"Class Divide"? by barlevg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't my issue with it either. My (irrational) hatred for Glass-wearers is along the same vein as my disdain for people who have their cell phones out at nice restaurants while their dining companions are with them (often with their own cell phones out). Glass is a statement that you can't bear to be disconnected from the internet for fifteen fucking minutes while you enjoy a nice meal, a walk outside, or a social event. But yeah, it's not jealously.

    5. Re:"Class Divide"? by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally, I think this goes for all electronics. The number of people who seem to think it's required to video record or take hundreds of photos (using camcorder, tablet, phone, digi-cam, or Google glass) every single thing that happens is kind of bothersome. My wife gets annoyed because I don't take enough photos of the kids when we're doing things, but personally I just try to enjoy the moment, and not let electronics get in the way. I'd rather just truly enjoy the moment then not really enjoy the moment because I was futzing with the camera and be able to see the moment later.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:"Class Divide"? by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I feel your pain. I'm an amateur photographer with all the high end equipment I need to capture beautiful shots (I prefer landscapes and still life). I absolutely abhor being told by my wife or parents that I'm going to be the designated photographer for an event, and, after losing yet another explosive argument where they won't accept "No" as an answer, I will often "forget" my camera equipment accidentally on purpose, and remind them that I said flatly...no. I'm going to an event to partake in it! Just by being behind a lens of any kind, be it smart phone, Digital Cam, Film Cam, Google Glass... I'm no longer a participant; I'm relegated to an objective observer, and my family doesn't understand why it pisses me off so much.

    7. Re: "Class Divide"? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That basically describes everything in Wired magazine, and their target demographic.

      It's aimed at people who want to feel superior because the read Wired magazine, and being different strokes their ego.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re: "Class Divide"? by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was an incident at a Walmart I happened to be at. Not a big deal really, but enough to get law enforcement involved in. It happened in the parking lot. One day when I was bored waiting for someone to come out, I counted the cameras. 14 along the roof line facing the parking lot.

      When they had the incident, I said "well, you can pull the video from your cameras." The manager got real vague and then said "well, maybe the home office can..." Rough translation is exactly what you said. The cameras are for show. So all we had was the description of the suspects. No vehicle, No plates. No idea which way they were headed out of the parking lot. So enough for a police report, and nothing useful to follow up on.

      It was Walmart's loss, not mine. If they could have done more, like call the home office and get the video, they would have. Instead I learned that they operate security theater, just like most places.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  2. Hipster logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'm going to wear these obnoxiously ugly glasses that happen to record everything I see. People object to my presence, but that's fine, because I totally spent one and a half thousand dollars on this accessory that marks me as a smug upper-class, privacy-invading nerd. Google Glass is here to stay (and don't forget I was into it before it was cool)."

  3. Bully! by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I wear it at work, co-workers sometimes call me an asshole. My co-workers at WIRED, where we’re bravely facing the future, find it weird. People stop by and cyber-bully me at my standing treadmill desk.

    You've got a standing treadmill desk, and it's GLASS people make fun of?

    This guy's already living the douche life.

  4. The best part? by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    The ads are more relevant to his interests than ever before!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. The future is on its way by areusche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go f*ck yourself Matt Honan. I should invent a "Glasshole Killer" hat which projects a bright IR light onto the user's face effectively blinding the device's recording capabilities.

    It will take hell or hight water to get "Glass" onto the people that spend god awful amounts of money on fashion and tech toys. The glasses are ugly looking AND imply that you're being recorded. There is resistance for a reason. The glasses need to be completely innocuous for this entire fashion/tech concept to take off. "

    1. Re:The future is on its way by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All these people so worried about being recorded in public are already being recorded in public!!! Look around you. Do you see that camera in the corner that is always on and always recording? Other than mobility and the fact that user has to audibly say, "record" on Glass, what's the difference?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  6. Self esteem problem much? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> Glass separates you. It sets you apart from everyone else. It says you not only had $1,500 to plunk down to be part of the “explorer” program, but that Google deemed you special enough to warrant inclusion

    Um...OK. Self esteem problem much?

    >> his wife wanted him to take pictures and shoot videos of their child's birth, but not with Glass

    Maybe she's one of those "passive aggressive" weirdos who doesn't want video of their private parts uploaded to the Internet. Good luck in divorce court, man.

  7. It will work out fine by Todd+Palin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will work out fine for all the people that really love technology but don't actually have any real life friends. You know who I'm talking about. No friends = no one to object.

    Personally, I'm offended if one of my friends spends more than a few seconds staring at a smartphone in a social situation. Its OK if they excuse themselves from the group, but it isn't if they are sitting with other people and mentally somewhere else. Google glass is the same, but maybe worse because you think they are there but aren't.

  8. Re:True quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe in 30 years, and even then it won't work the way google wants it to. Come on, this is this decade's "Segway" , a solution in search of a problem.

  9. "Future is on its way"... Nope by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And it's not "inevitable". Just hip fanboi hype.

    Problem with Goggle Glass is that it's in your face. It's conspicuous. It may not be recording at the moment, but you don't know that for sure.

    It's like, if I'm walking around holding a cellphone in hand with arm stretched out and pointed in such a way that it looks like I'm recording a video, and then started engaging in conversation with people while still in that pose, but now the camera is pointed directly at them, people will get uncomfortable. (unless of course the person I"m talking to wants to be recorded). It's in their face. It's annoying.

    Google Glass is kind of like that, all the time.

    Another example: you might be walking around in a city where it's perfectly legal to carry firearms in public if you have a permit. And say it's a shall-issue state where anyone can get a permit if they don't have criminal records, so a large percentage of the population does. Now you're in a crowded city area, and you *know* many of the people are packing concealed heat. But it rarely crosses your mind because it's not in your face. Out of sight, out of mind.

    But suppose instead of concealed carry, people are walking around openly wearing their Glocks on their hips, AK-47s slung across their shoulder and so on. This is in your face. Your reaction is going to be much different.

  10. If you ever talk to someone wearing Google Glass.. by jdastrup · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ..just hold your own smartphone up by your face, as if you're recording them while you talk to them. Whether you are recording or not, I can't imagine the Glasshole won't be slightly annoyed by what you are doing.

  11. Re:True quote by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Jumping the gun a bit, aren't you? Or did you call everyone who didn't believe that 3D TV would catch on a Luddite too?

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  12. Re:True quote by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, ignoring technological (and social, for that matter) advance doesn't make it go away.

    Not every predicted advance catches on. Sometimes a new technology doesn't catch the public fancy the way pundits think it will (such as 3D anything), or it just turns out to be a passing fad (VRML anyone?), or it's just impractical (remember those flying cars we were all supposed to be driving by now?). And Google Glass has yet to prove itself catchy, long-lasting, OR practical.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  13. You guys are thinking about this all wrong... by mikecase · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've had Glass for a couple of weeks and the experience has been interesting. I live in a area w/ about 250,000 people and there are probably fewer than five (including myself) who have Glass. I've been wearing them around town to see how people react to them and so far it seems pretty positive. Some people just kind of look at me oddly, but many people recognize what it is and ask me what the experience is like. This is what I tell them: Sure, it's great to have access to (most) of the Google Now functionality without needing to look down at my phone. Text messages delivered to the HUD is handy, as is responding to them via voice. For the most part though, there isn't a whole lot these do yet, certainly not enough for average consumers to care. That said, the potential for business/industrial use is HUGE. Most people's first experience with Glass won't be as a consumer item, but rather as something they use for work. Think construction workers, or people who work in hospitals or laboratories. Many people will be exposed to these via applications in the work environment. You, as a consumer, may not be very interested in Glass, but there are many businesses who want/need something like this for their workforce.

  14. Re:True quote by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A 3D TV has pretty much one use. I can envision dozens of niche apps for Google Glass without even trying that could make real differences in some areas.

    How about Glass for an auto mechanic. Look under the hood of a car and it overlays the wiring diagram, exhaust diagram, part you're looking at with price and local availability, etc. Switch layers on and off with a glance or voice command.

    Add a bluetooth ODB2 synced to Glass and you can see real-time engine stats as you are working under the hood. No more having to have a stack of manuals or tweak something and look up at the portable computer to see what change it made. You see the changes as it happens.

    Add auto recognition of the make and model, so you don't have to look up which manuals.

    Ditto airplane mechanics.

    I can also easily imagine augmented reality applications for surgeons, dentists, dermatologists and just about every category of health professional.

    How about an app for foreign tourists. Auto translate whatever written material you look at. Read street signs, menus, directions, brochures, etc. Probably an audio version of that as well -- automatically translating what you hear. Maybe subtitles.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  15. Re:True quote by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    All my TVs were 3D until quite recently. Now I can afford a 2D one so that there's more room in my room!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  16. love the summary quote by murdocj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It sets you apart from everyone else. It says you not only had $1,500 to plunk down to be part of the “explorer” program, but that Google deemed you special enough to warrant inclusion (not everyone who wanted Glass got it; you had to be selected). Glass is a class divide on your face.

    Really? You point a video recording device at people and you think they are getting annoyed because you are so elite? That comment says way more about the author of the article than it does about the people he interacted with.

  17. Re:Swing and a miss... by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Security Cameras have implied consent by you being in an area. Google Glass comes into YOUR area without your consent. Security cameras aren't also directly being uploaded to youtube and are rarely even viewed by human eyes unless someone is looking at an incident.