Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Payments Go Live At Overstock — Two Quarters Early

New submitter citab writes with news that "the first major retailer is now accepting bitcoins!" In December, Overstock.com announced that they would begin accepting Bitcoin for payment as early as the end of second quarter 2014, but decided to make it a priority task to avoid having someone else beat them to it. From the article: "Last Tuesday, the company struck a deal to handle Bitcoin payments through a service operated by the suddenly hot San Francisco startup Coinbase, and since then, a team of Overstock engineers has worked almost every waking hour to prepare the site for what is undeniably a key moment in the digital currency’s short history. ... [Overstock CEO] Byrne believes this can ultimately boost the company’s bottom line, but that’s not his only aim. For Byrne, a rather opinionated libertarian who’s unafraid to take his company places others fear to tread, embracing the cryptocurrency is as much a political statement as a business decision. Like so many others, he believes Bitcoin can free the world from the control of big banks and big government. 'It helps us fight the machine,' he says."

182 comments

  1. First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    was Silkroad.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can anyone explain why this is marked Funny and not Informative?

      It was BTC's "dirty little secret" that as long as you could buy drugs with it, it had value. Losing SR caused panic on the BTC market for exactly that reason.

    2. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the owner of that is facing fed time may even get in a fpmeita time

    3. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. Although what you said is not wrong, I think much of it was due to uncertainty. Bitcoin prided itself in being secure; whether from taking it away, or just being anonymous in your transactions. Even though the FBI didn't "break" bitcoins in that way, it sure did cause a lot of people to worry that they, too, could lose their wallets much like Dread Pirate Roberts.

    4. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It had value before the SR, it has value after. SR just increased velocity.

    5. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ross was an idiot who gave away his identity when he first started working on silkroad (forum posts asking for help) and many otherr mistakes, poor opsec, hiring hitmen (cops in disguise), and ordering fake ids (another trap) and much more. He didn't even use tor to connect to the silkroad server in iceland which led to that being located and imaged as well.

      Ross was truly and idiot and its amazing how long it took LE to find and catch him at all as he was not trying to stay hidden at all.

      That said, SilkRoad is still up and doing very well.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    6. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Quibble: The owners of BTC wallets are anonymous; not the transactions.

      But sure, there were some other confidence scares with the bust -- not just the loss of SR itself.

      ...if anyone asked me what you could do with BTC, I pretty much said, "Well, you can rent some server space, donate to the EFF or buy some party drugs."

    7. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1, Informative

      First major retailer to reach for freedom from the big banks was Khaddafi. We shot him in the head for it, and claimed he was being a terrorist dictator tyrant.

      Lessons learned: Don't buy your oil with gold. The world bank will have America assassinate you.

    8. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      A new SR is up and doing well...

      Ross' greatest contribution was giving us a story worthy of a Movie of the Week if not at least a Dateline episode narrated by that white haired guy with the awesome voice :)

    9. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone explain why this is marked Funny and not Informative?

      It's funny because SR was really the only market where BTC actually had value as a medium of exchange - ie, the trade of actual goods and services. It's informative for the same reason.

      I'll accept BTC as a real currency once we start seeing credible numbers that people are actually using it to buy stuff besides alpaca socks, web services, drugs and assassinations.

      Let overstock.com and the others report their sales in BTC so we all can see if BTC is legitimate or not. Until then, there's no evidence that it's anything more than a speculative (zero sum) plaything for nerds.

    10. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SilkRoad was not a retailer. They were a market. There is a huge difference.
      Most of the anonymous markets are legit.
      Most of the retailers, whether on those markets or operating independantly elsewhere, are scams.

    11. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Yay it's tin foil hat time! So, the World Bank hates Euros as much as gold?

    12. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was reported in the Silk Road forums a week or two ago that three people involved with Silk Road 2.0 were recently arrested. It looks like their security isn't very good either.

      Of course if they get taken down a replacement will come up within weeks. Drugs are too popular and too rewarding to merchants for the prohibitionists to be able to suppress them. There will always be someone happy to take the risk and become wealthy acting as a middle-man with these black market sites.

    13. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can it be a zero sum game? The bitcoin network has obviously created wealth in the world.

      What does it matter that Overstock is immediately converting bitcoins to USD? That still means that bitcoins are being used as a... wait for it... medium of exchange.

      You do realize that people speculate in other currencies, too, right?

      Loud-mouthed fool.

    14. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Can anyone explain why this is marked Funny and not Informative?

      Because strictly speaking, Silk Road is a marketplace and not a retailer, as it's in the business of connecting independent vendors with customers.

    15. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What does it matter that Overstock is immediately converting bitcoins to USD?

      Selling coins reduces the liquidity of the exchanges, purchasing coins increases it.
      If a large retailer starts selling a lot of coins but people don't begin buying coins at the same rate, the value of the coin itself drops. They don't have the option in the US (or most countries) to pay their workers in bitcoin, because we made it illegal to use Scrip for paying workers due to the horrible abuses it allowed. And for the most part they don't have the option to use the coin to purchase more inventory because most suppliers still aren't accepting it as payment.

      There really isn't any good reason for people to rush out and buy bitcoin just so they can buy stuff on Overstock. So the only people who will actually DO that are people who already have coin in their wallet, or people who are intentionally trying to increase the popularity of the currency.

      The bitcoin network has obviously created wealth in the world.

      Lol, no it hasn't. All it's done is shift wealth around, there is no inherent value to the coin itself.

      People who are getting all Drunk on bitcoin really need to look at what happens when private industry is allowed to control currency and payment systems.
      Here's a start: wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrip
      Make no mistake, bitcoin is not nearly as "decentralized" as people would like you to think, and it's not nearly as free from manipulation as is claimed. The difference is that it's the privately owned Exchanges which get to make the rules, as opposed to governments.

    16. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Funny

      Very well said. BitCoins resemble company scrip more than any other medium of exchange. They are NOT legal tender thus no-one has to exchange them. If I had mod-points I'd use them for you...very rarely do I see an AC post worth moding up...

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    17. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by SMTB1963 · · Score: 1

      How can it be a zero sum game?

      It's a zero sum game if virtually all BTC transactions occur on the BTC to fiat exchanges, where no wealth is created.

      The bitcoin network has obviously created wealth in the world.

      That remains to be seen, but if you have some numbers to back up that assertion, let's see them.

      What does it matter that Overstock is immediately converting bitcoins to USD? That still means that bitcoins are being used as a... wait for it... medium of exchange.

      Huh? Who said anything about overstock converting BTC to USD? What they do with their BTC receipts (if any) was not addressed in my post. Back on topic, just because overstock.com has announced their acceptance of BTC doesn't mean anyone has actually paid them in BTC.

      You do realize that people speculate in other currencies, too, right?

      Loud-mouthed fool.

      And what does that have to do with the price of tea in China? You do know that speculation is, by definition, a zero sum game...right?

      Small minded fool.

    18. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by kasperd · · Score: 1

      I'll accept BTC as a real currency once we start seeing credible numbers that people are actually using it to buy stuff besides alpaca socks, web services, drugs and assassinations.

      I don't think anybody successfully bought an assassination paid with bitcoin.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    19. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by kasperd · · Score: 2

      What does it matter that Overstock is immediately converting bitcoins to USD?

      Whether it is even a good idea for them to convert those bitcoin to USD is an open question. If they convert them immediately and end up with less USD than if they had received payment in USD in the first place, that just makes it a complicated (read expensive) scheme for giving some customers a discount. That is probably not a good strategy.

      If they hold onto the bitcoins they receive, then that will put a cap on how much they could possibly sell through that method. That cap would also put a cap on how much they could lose on their bitcoin adventure. Additionally, doing so would take some bitcoins out of circulation. Taking bitcoins out of circulation while simultaneously providing value to the coin by providing goods you can buy with it, could potentially push the price of bitcoin upwards. If that happens they could slowly start selling some of those bitcoins at a profit.

      A strategy that puts a cap on your possible losses while opening an opportunity for additional profit sounds like a good plan. But of course there are no guarantees, losses are losses, even if there is a cap on them.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    20. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that no one paid for an assassination in BTC, or that no one who paid for an assassination in BTC got their money's worth?

    21. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by PRMan · · Score: 1

      They got over $10,000 worth of BTC in the first hour and they convert 100% to dollars immediately with Coinbase.com taking the risk.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    22. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Because strictly speaking, Silk Road is a marketplace and not a retailer, as it's in the business of connecting independent vendors with customers.

      It was also a payment facilitator. Silk Road was more like eBay+Paypal combined, with the exception that you MUST use the Silk Road to pay the seller.

      The 27,000 BTC that the FBI seized were such in-transit money - it was escrow money that buyers sent to the Silk Road to pay the sellers in trust. (Of course, Silk Road took a percentage). They still haven't found the DPR stash, worth much more.

      Technically, the buyers could appeal to the FBI for the money back, but since the FBI would need to know transaction details and records (which wallet, which destination, which transaction it was for - there's full record keeping in BTC, and Silk Road had to keep temporary in-flight records while the money was in escrow), well, they'd be released and re-seized under different laws.

    23. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by PRMan · · Score: 1

      They are converting immediately with Coinbase taking the risk, but it would be smarter if they limited themselves to 30 days like Visa. They would drive the price of bitcoin up by doing so and make even more money.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    24. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by PRMan · · Score: 1

      We already know that assassinations were paid for in bitcoin on Silk Road. Hard to say if any of them succeeded.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    25. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that no one paid for an assassination in BTC, or that no one who paid for an assassination in BTC got their money's worth?

      Allegedly somebody did attempt it twice and got cheated both times by different people. As far as I recall the first time he was cheated by some gang of criminals and the second time he was cheated by FBI.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    26. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They are converting immediately with Coinbase taking the risk..."

      You keep saying that - but you don't know. That information would never be released by Coinbase, and hasn't been released by Overstock's CEO.

      Given Mr. Byrne's massive Bitcoin boner, he may very well be keeping all the Bitcoin for himself and putting equivalent USD back into the Overstock pot, in an effort to become a major billionaire player, down the road a year or two from now. Or he could be keeping half, and converting half to USD with Coinbase.

      We don't know.

      Neither do you.

    27. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by LF11 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a dumb statement. Take a look at this chart http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg150ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zv. See that little blip at the beginning of October? Yeah, that's your "panic."

      Bitcoin was held down because of silk road, not supported.

    28. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's implied right in the goddamn article, asshat:

      Before each payment is made, Coinbase sets an exchange rate, immediately converts the buyer’s bitcoin into dollars, and transfers the dollars to Overstock. The retailer never holds any bitcoin.

      Here's the CEO saying it himself in another article:

      we will either immediately convert bitcoin to dollars or hedge our bitcoin risk through bitcoin-dollar derivatives (should such a market develop).

      Given that no such market has yet developed, they are indeed converting bitcoins directly to dollars.

      What's it like wearing your ass as a hat?

    29. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Before each payment is made, Coinbase sets an exchange rate, immediately converts the buyer’s bitcoin into dollars, and transfers the dollars to Overstock. The retailer never holds any bitcoin." ...A generic overview of how Coinbase operates. Which has *nothing* to do with what Overstock may or may not do.

      "we will **either** immediately convert bitcoin to dollars or hedge our bitcoin risk through bitcoin-dollar derivatives (should such a market develop)." ...Just as I said.

      What's it like wearing your mother's dick in your ear, fuckwad?

    30. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by mysidia · · Score: 1

      was Silkroad.

      But they were shutdown.

      Overstock might be the first major mainstream retailer accepting BTC that sticks with legal products.

    31. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Zynder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you can rent some server space, donate to the EFF or buy some party drugs

      3 very important things!

    32. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      Amen. Someone please mod parent up. There is more insight in that comment than on the rest of this entire page.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    33. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by pantaril · · Score: 1

      It was BTC's "dirty little secret" that as long as you could buy drugs with it, it had value. Losing SR caused panic on the BTC market for exactly that reason.

      Bitcoin lost no value because of SilkRoad closure, look at the value of bitcoin when silkroad closed (october 2013, cca 250 USD/BTC) and look at the value now (cca 950 USD/BTC). I wouldn't call it loss. There wasn't even any dramatic drop right after the news broke in october, just look at the graph at bitcoinity.

    34. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by pantaril · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They don't have the option in the US (or most countries) to pay their workers in bitcoin

      This is obviously lie. One counterexample: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/03/kentucky-town-from-colbert-report-to-pay-police-chief-in-bitcoin/

      People who are getting all Drunk on bitcoin really need to look at what happens when private industry is allowed to control currency and payment systems.
      Here's a start: wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrip
      Make no mistake, bitcoin is not nearly as "decentralized" as people would like you to think, and it's not nearly as free from manipulation as is claimed. The difference is that it's the privately owned Exchanges which get to make the rules, as opposed to governments.

      What do you mean by that? Scrip has central authority which controls how is it issued, bitcoin has no such think. What rules did the exchanges make? I thought all the rules are given by the bitcoin protocol described in the original whitepaper: bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. No private industry controls bitcoin.

    35. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by pantaril · · Score: 1

      Very well said. BitCoins resemble company scrip more than any other medium of exchange.

      You missed one of the most important feature of Bitcoin - no central authority which can issue new units at will. Also the correct way to write the word is Bitcoin, no BitCoin.

    36. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by pantaril · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ordering fake ids (another trap)... he was not trying to stay hidden at all.

      Why did he order fake IDs if he wasn't trying to stay hidden at all? I think you seriously underestimate the difficulty to run hidden service. It's asymetric war, the operator must do everythink correctly, the attacker needs to find only single mistake.

      Ross is not an idiot, he is a hero who tried to run usefull service which could save many lives by ensuring some quality of the goods the shop was selling (thanks to user ratings). The idiots are the politicians who run war on drugs and the voters who support them. I feel sorry for his live ruined by the government.

    37. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by SMTB1963 · · Score: 0

      They got over $10,000 worth of BTC in the first hour and they convert 100% to dollars immediately with Coinbase.com taking the risk.

      I hope you don't mind that I'm not going to take your word on that, unless you can prove you're working in the overstock.com treasury department. Otherwise, citation needed.

    38. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Even if they did, I'd wonder what point that is supposed to prove. It isn't as if assassinations haven't been bought with other currencies. Hell, I remember watching a Forensic Files episode where some guy bought an assassination with opals.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    39. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed one of the most important feature of Bitcoin - no central authority which can issue new units at will.

      That's not a feature, that's a bug.

    40. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 0

      Ross is not an idiot, he is a hero who tried to run usefull service which could save many lives by ensuring some quality of the goods the shop was selling (thanks to user ratings)....I feel sorry for his live ruined by the government.

      Yeah, just ignore the people he tried to have murdered and all.

    41. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some mod(s) are obviously on dope today, modding everything "funny."

    42. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      And pay for a VPN to hide your IP when trading in Bitcoins.

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    43. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Probably not informative because Silk road wasn't a retailer according to any definition I've ever seen.

      That would be like saying ebay is a retailer.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    44. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by SMTB1963 · · Score: 1

      Even if they did, I'd wonder what point that is supposed to prove.

      It's supposed to prove that (off the thinly traded BTC exchanges), few BTC transactions are for the purchase of everyday goods and services. Of course, it doesn't actually prove that, but it raises an important question.

      Conversly, "ZOMG, O.CO accepts BTC!!!" doesn't prove that people are actually using BTC to purchase anything from O.CO.

      If Byrne wants to promote BTC, let him disclose O.CO's BTC sales every quarter.

    45. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by pantaril · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just ignore the people he tried to have murdered and all.

      He tried to murder a scumbag who tried to blackmail him and only because he didn't have any legal recourse. If the blackmailer reported Ross and his users to the authorities the damage to their personal life would be overhelming. Again, it's fault of the law enforcement which rages war on innocent drug users and don't protect its citizens agains serious crimes like blackmailing.

    46. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Losing SR caused panic on the BTC market for exactly that reason.

      Bitcoin has been averaging at around $900 on MtGox consistently for almost two months now. Of course there are ups and downs, and you should not care for those if you are not trading for a living, but notice the averaging I am talking about. Where exactly did you see the panic?

      The only panic there is, is from whoever did not get aboard this train in good time.

      Stop bullshitting bitcoin already, both you and the rest of the 'experts'. Unless the world government bans it, or someone figures out how to make fake coins, it is here to stay. Deal with it.

    47. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Where does Overstock get the coins to sell?
      From people who pay for their wares with these coins.
      Where do these people get their coins from?

      - self-mined will be a small margin.
      - hoarders spending from their hoard, reintroducing frozen coin to the market, which is positive
      - people buying BTC. The same BTC that Overstock is selling.

      The increase in sales of BTC from Overstock will be met with about equivalent increase in demand for BTC in order to purchase goods from Overstock.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    48. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

      A sheriff in Kentucky is getting paid in Bitcoin. This a happened a couple months ago.

    49. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

      And buy anything at overstock.com

    50. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by AJodock · · Score: 1

      Why would I want the government to be able to devalue my currency?

      People are scared of Bitcoin because it is deflationary, which doesn't promote as much economic growth. Well from what I can see the current inflationary practices have just pushed people into a spend-spend-spend mode, buying crap they don't need because if they don't their money won't be worth as much later. While that may be pumping money into the economy it seems to be making our economy all that much more destabilized, while putting money into the hands of people that already have too much of it.

      If people were saving a better portion of their money instead of buying things all of the time, recovering from economic turmoil would be that much easier, especially if the government can't just print money to devalue the money we have saved to bail itself out. If the government is in trouble it should be raising money by increasing taxes (steal my money directly instead of behind my back so that I know how much they are actually taking).

      The current method works as a positive in peoples brains. The government inflates the currency, your job gives you a raise to cover that inflation, and suddenly it looks like you have more money in your bank account, even though it is worth less per $. If people could see the REAL costs of their government in their deductions column instead of seeing steady raises that don't increase their buying power maybe they would do something to stop the ridiculous government spending.

    51. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a large retailer starts selling a lot of coins but people don't begin buying coins at the same rate, the value of the coin itself drops.

      So who buys the bitcoins the retailer is selling then? This has to count as one of the most uninformed comments I have ever seen in relation to bitcoins. You can't take them to the bank Einstein, if nobody buys them, the retailer can't sell them either. The only thing it changes is that it increases the usage of bitcoins, and that's exactly what the system needs at this point.

      Try to understand this difference with regular cash please. It is the whole point of bitcoin, failing to see that makes your comments meaningless, and seeing them modded up to +5 just goes to show how many other brilliant sheep we have around here.

    52. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      Fuck him. I have no problem with drugs per say, but drug dealers are generally scum. No amount of 'war' will stop the supply, but like fly paper, it is generally a good method for removing dickheads from society.

    53. Re: First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      But you know, just ignore the murder.

    54. Re:First major retailer to accept Bitcoin by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      It was BTC's "dirty little secret" that as long as you could buy drugs with it, it had value. Losing SR caused panic on the BTC market for exactly that reason.

      The shuttering of silk road caused panic for only a few hours. The value was recovered in less than 1/4 of a day. But for weeks afterward there were misleading headlines about how Bitcoin had lost half its value. Yes, it did lose its value - for a very short while.

      Personally, I was very surprised that the value didn't go farther down and stay there much longer.

  2. Fantastic news by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is fantastic news, and I hope more major retailers follow.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, I wonder what would happen if you purchased some with Bitcoin and the value drops in half after you place the order but before it's shipped.

      Yes, Bitcoin is that volitile and I'd tell the vendor to shove it if they demanded the balance.

    2. Re:Fantastic news by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Informative

      They use coinbase which, like bitpay, will convert the btc into usd for the supplier. They will have their usd payment just as quickly as any other payment processor so there is no issue of the price dropping before an item is even prepared for shipping let alone before it is shipped.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    3. Re:Fantastic news by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that o.co takes BTC, it's that o.co takes a 3rd party payment processor that handles BTC.

      It's not any fundamentally different than taking Paypal or Mastercard (for that matter), other than that their merchant agreement might have some sort windows for the currency exchange valuation lock-in.

    4. Re: Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      order cancelled

    5. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy -- when you pay them, you owe the highest market price over a window of the past 48 hours, and when they pay you (e.g. for a refund, or wages) it's based on the average market price over the past 48 hours.

    6. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can it? It has actual worth now, especially after Chinese interests have moved value into the currency. It is at USD 837 right now, and only going up. Yes, it takes hits, but it bounces right back.

    7. Re:Fantastic news by Seumas · · Score: 1

      A bunch of them will.

      And then they'll realize how ridiculous it is and they'll slowly and quietly begin to remove the payment method.

    8. Re:Fantastic news by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

      In addition to what the Parent said, there is going to be increased stability in BitCoins as the currency gains acceptance. That stability will cause the currency's value to rise as stability increases, to the point where it becomes THE currency people barter for, rather than USD or EURO. At that point, you'll see sudden decrease in value of the other FIAT currencies, and deflationary nature of BitCoin to start happening.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:Fantastic news by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same thing as if you order something from a different country and the exchange rate between the two currencies changes. It pretty much always will change in that window, and the vendor just has to make the decision that they are willing to accept the volatility in the value of the currency. Granted, that's asking a lot, as Bitcoin has been known to be very volatile, but it's fundamentally no different to what's already happening.

    10. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is fantastic news, and I hope more major retailers follow.

      Major retailer? Let's rephrase the headline, shall we?

      Overstock.com (a company that few people consider buying from), decided to get some free publicity by allowing payments with Bitcoin (or rather allows coinbase to act as intermediary), which made it popular on the internet (the source of all the people that would buy from the company anyway). It costs the company next to zero, gets more customers, and the only possible downside would be the attachment to Bitcoin's reputation, which is probably better than Overstock's anyway, which is not saying much about either one of them.

    11. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the vendor just has to make the decision that they are willing to accept the volatility in the value of the currency.

      Not necessarily. He can also buy an option to insure himself against unfortunate movements. I'm sure that if Bitcoins get wide acceptance, you'll also be able to buy options for them.

    12. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Coinbase? Bitpay?

      So to get bitcoin to actually work for payment processing, you have to insert a trusted third party between a buyer and seller. Thanks for clearing that up.

    13. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still less than traditional electronic purchases. It's quite common for a transaction between an e-commerce website and a customer to include 3 other 3rd parties...processors like PayPal, networks like Visa and MasterCard and the actual banks like Capital One and Chase. That's a lot more 3rd parties than a BitCoin transaction.

    14. Re:Fantastic news by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you joking, or did you drink gallons of the bitcoin kool-aid? There's no reason that a single bitcoin should be worth more than $1, much less close to $1,000. It's all based on speculators, rather than any inherent value to bitcoins. Why make early-adopters and the founders of a single crypto-currency wealthy, when we can create new crypto-currencies as needed?

      If crypto-currencies catch on, bitcoin will just be one of many, and I expect it to be worth a small fraction of the current bubble price caused by speculators rather than people actually using it as money.

    15. Re:Fantastic news by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      No. You have to have a third party to convert bitcoins to USD. That's due to the nature of USD, not bitcoin.

      If you were transacting purely it bitcoin, you wouldn't need a third party.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    16. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. You have to have a third party to convert bitcoins to USD. That's due to the nature of USD, not bitcoin.

      If you were transacting purely it bitcoin, you wouldn't need a third party.

      That's great if you can eat alpaca socks. For the rest of us it means that a trusted third party is required to transact in BTC.

    17. Re:Fantastic news by PRMan · · Score: 1

      They use coinbase which, like bitpay, will convert the btc into usd for the supplier. They will have their usd payment just as quickly as any other payment processor so there is no issue of the price dropping before an item is even prepared for shipping let alone before it is shipped.

      But with bitcoin, they will have about 2% more money.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    18. Re:Fantastic news by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      No, it means a trusted third party is required to transact in BTC at the moment. There's nothing inherent about bitcoin that means it can be traded for alpaca socks, but not pumpkins. If bitcoin becomes more widely used, it's value will stabilise. If it's value stabilises, it'll become accepted by more merchants, including merchants selling food.

      Really, you're just re-iterating the same sentiment Ken Olson did: "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home". No, there probably wasn't - then. His failure and yours is that you insist on assuming that the current state of affairs will persist indefinitely into the future. The value of bitcoin isn't what you can do with it now, but what you might be able to do with it in the future.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    19. Re:Fantastic news by LF11 · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Coinbase/Bitpay exist so vendors can receive USD while accepting Bitcoin from customers.

      Vendors have to pay bills, too. Eventually, even the vendors' vendors will accept bitcoin, and Coinbase won't be necessary. It'll be a while yet.

    20. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't make many online purchases WITHOUT a trusted third party.

      When I buy on Ali Express, I can be confident that I'm not going to be ripped off, because the seller doesn't receive payment from Ali Express until I acknowledge that the goods arrived and were what was expected.

      Whether I'm trading in USD, NZD, RMB, or BTC, it doesn't matter, I still want some large (so they don't turn tail with my money) intermediary to escrow my payment.

    21. Re:Fantastic news by JcMorin · · Score: 2

      It's base on offer and demand, there is hundreds of copy/paste of Bitcoin (because it's open source) but none of them have the infrastructure and the acceptance as Bitcoin... that's a good reason why Bitcoin worth more. Also the other alt-coin have even worst "early adopter" holding, for instance Quarks Coin have already 95%+ already mine in a 6 months, while Bitcoin we are at over half in *4* years.

    22. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're just re-iterating the same profession of faith BTC proponents constantly regurgitate. "It's got problems now, but it will be great in the future" - just like "atomic power! electricity will be too cheap to meter". Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love ya, tomorrow. You're always a day away.

      And you're right, bitcoin can also be traded for pumpkins, but the pumpkin monger will face the same slew of risks she would by accepting payments in any non-local currency - or she'll have to pay a third party to accept the risks for her. BTC is a foreign currency for everyone, and until that changes there will have to be bit-pay, coinbase and other trusted third parties slapped on top of bitcoin to get it to actually work.

      You BTC faithful have a real problem accepting this basic truth; I assume it's because it undermines the validity of a system that was designed to eliminate trusted third parties and their fees in the first place.

    23. Re:Fantastic news by pantaril · · Score: 2

      There's no reason that a single bitcoin should be worth more than $1, much less close to $1,000. It's all based on speculators, rather than any inherent value to bitcoins.

      How did you come to the $1 figure? Why not 0.01$ or 1000$? Can you please elaborate?

    24. Re:Fantastic news by The_Noid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bitcoins don't have an inherent value, they're just numbers. Gold has an inherent value because it can be used for stuff. Bitcoins don't.

      If Bitcoin is meant to replace the US Dollar then the total value of all Bitcoins will have to equal the total value of all US Dollars.
      There was approximately $1.24 trillion in circulation as of December 25, 2013.
      There can be no more than 21 million bitcoins
      This puts the value that a bitcoin should have at the time it totally replaces the US Dollar at: 59047.6 US Dollar.

      Of course there are issues with this simplification, but it's a nice place to start.

    25. Re:Fantastic news by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

      The power bill that is the result of generating a Bitcoin disagrees indicates your view is invalid.

    26. Re:Fantastic news by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      What about BTC transfer delay?
      You're not guaranteed your transaction is included in the nearest block, nor even a block 6 hours from now. 6 hours is ages in the bitcoin market, and especially in times of panic the time increases.
      As result, you click "buy" on the item, copy the Overstock address to Bitcoin-QT, enter the desired amount, click "send" and... 3 hours later coinbase receives your bitcoin. And at that time the price doubled.
      Will Coinbase pay Overstock the price from 3 hours ago?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    27. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I jump off a building and mean to flap my arms and fly, then the lift generated by my arms must equal at least my body weight.
      This puts the value at about 100 lbs of lift force per arm.

      Therefore, I can generate 200 lbs of lift by flapping my arms.

      Of course there are issues with this simplification but it's a nice place to start.

    28. Re:Fantastic news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There's no reason that a single bitcoin should be worth more than $1, much less close to $1,000. It's all based on speculators, rather than any inherent value to bitcoins."

      Fuck I get soo goddamn tired of this stupid fucking bullshit...

      There is NO inherent value to anything. Anything. Not gold, not Dollars, not Euros. You know why you can use dollars to buy things? Because other people value dollars. You know why a bitcoin is worth more than $1? Because other people are willing to pay that much.

      That is what all value is. What other people are willing to trade for it. There is no state of being where something has value but no one is willing to trade you for it. That is physically impossible.

    29. Re:Fantastic news by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You know that the value of the dollar is largely based on speculation too, right? Specifically, speculation over the US economy.

      The way you guys seem to be willing to drive over the cliff and shut down your government over an unrelated political dispute that was supposed to have been settled makes me think that in comparison BTC can't be that bad.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. This Is Huge! Game Changing Step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the big game changer right here. This is what has been holding everything back, up until now. With this policy decision things are really going to take off. Clearly it has been the lack of Bitcoin that has been holding Overstock.com back for all this time.

    1. Re:This Is Huge! Game Changing Step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And vice-versa. Bitcoin's grandest moment yet. What glorious days!

    2. Re:This Is Huge! Game Changing Step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably got publicity worth tens of millions. A bit like Amazon with their drones.

    3. Re:This Is Huge! Game Changing Step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooooo...can I buy my Athletics season tickets with Bitcoins now?

    4. Re:This Is Huge! Game Changing Step by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Dammit. You beat me to it!!!

      Overstock.com (or O.co, or whatever the hell they're calling themselves these days), must have money to burn... They actually decided they wanted their name associated with the tarp-covered monstrosity of a sewer in Oakland.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  4. Wow by locrien · · Score: 1

    I guess I will actually have to consider buying things on overstock now.

    I mostly ignored them due to their annoying commercials before.

    1. Re:Wow by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      I mostly ignored them due to their annoying commercials before.

      If adding "The B" for "Bitcoin" means "Its all about the BO" I dont think that will improve their commercials. Actually I think I'll need a few cocktails just to try to get that image out of my head.

    2. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh God get it out!

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The door swings both ways. I never considered using overstock.com before and now I will definitely avoid them.

  5. I don't get it by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

    How can a company be ok with selling something for 600, no wait 1000, no wait 700, no wait 1200--aaargh 500 dollars?

    1. Re:I don't get it by ugen · · Score: 4, Informative

      They don't actually accept bitcoins (or quote prices in bitcoins). What they do is offer a 3rd party check-out option. At the time of check out, the amount of USD will be converted to bitcoins according to the rate quoted by 3rd party (coinbase) and buyer would have to send the quoted amount. According to FAQ, quotes are valid for 10 minutes.

      This mode of payment conveniently comes with a number of restrictions, in particular any orders paid for in this manner are not refundable in either USD or bitcoin, all buyer can get back is store credit.

      More importantly, I don't see what is there to gain for bitcoin users. Privacy afforded by bitcoin is lost here since buyer identity is known to at least two parties - Overstock and Coinbase.

    2. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coinbase does all that work. The company sets a US$ amount for the sales price, and coinbase automatically varies the BTC value according to coinbases' current exchange value (which fluctuates along with the value on other fiat currency exchanges, but usually at a 3-5% lower value, so more BTC for same $ amount). You can also set up coinbase to automatically cash out the BTC and start a bank transfer/deposit with several different triggers (be it amount of BTC, or a daily trigger).

    3. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the privacy loss different than if they took BTC directly?

    4. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What loss? Overstock pays taxes and keeps shipping records. If you were to pay them directly, the government would know just as much about you.

    5. Re:I don't get it by DougOtto · · Score: 1

      Privacy afforded by bitcoin is lost here since buyer identity is known to at least two parties - Overstock and Coinbase.

      And UPS.

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    6. Re:I don't get it by ugen · · Score: 1

      Loss compared to "ideal" use of bitcoin. In this case, bitcoin provides no better privacy than using a major credit card. Aside from privacy - what other objective advantages are to bitcoin compared to other payment methods?

    7. Re:I don't get it by BaronAaron · · Score: 1

      More importantly, I don't see what is there to gain for bitcoin users. Privacy afforded by bitcoin is lost here since buyer identity is known to at least two parties - Overstock and Coinbase.

      Many people are interested in bitcoin because of the lack of central bank control and it's non fiat currency nature.

    8. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people are interested in bitcoin because of the lack of central bank control and it's non fiat currency nature.

      I'd hope so, Bitcoins are hard to make good out of.

    9. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess for some the fact that you don't need to pass a credit check to participate in Bitcoin might be a major advantage.

    10. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not necessarily about privacy. It's about economy. And flipping the finger to Visa/MC/etc and the current context in which banks play a role.

      As you well know, this will allow ill gotten and well washed bitcoin to enter the economy. Since you can never prevent washing, nor prove that in the myriad of transactions that any particular fraction you hold are truly clean unless you are the original miner, you might as well accept that and welcome them into your payment systems and thus to your bottom line.
      God Bless sensible businesses such as Overstock!

      btw: btc is about to go orbital. buy now or forever shut your mouth.

    11. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because a currency that works by displaying all transactions to all the word just screams, 'use me for privacy'.

    12. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many people are interested in bitcoin because of the lack of central bank control and it's non fiat currency nature.

      non fiat? Are you saying that bitcoins have intrinsic value?

    13. Re:I don't get it by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      It means I can pay for something on a website without some fucker draining my bank account or running up my credit card. Good luck signing me up for some surprise automatic billing BS either.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    14. Re:I don't get it by lgw · · Score: 2

      What privacy to you think bitcoin provides? The government knows the physical address associated with the IP address associated with every bitcoin transaction. OK, sure it may be easier to use a stolen WiFi than a stolen credit card, but that's a pretty slim advantage.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:I don't get it by lgw · · Score: 2

      How is bitcoin not a fiat currency? Its supply is determined by algorithm instead of by a central bank, but that's not what "fiat" is about. For that matter, its supply is only controlled until it becomes mainstream - if BTC-denominated savings accounts ("eurobitcoins"), BTC futures, and BTC-denominated insurance policies come into play, the supply will be quite uncontrolled.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:I don't get it by westlake · · Score: 1

      As middleman, what percentage of the transaction goes to Coinbase?

    17. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see what is there to gain for bitcoin users. Privacy afforded by bitcoin is lost here since buyer identity is known to at least two parties

      Not really. See I just put in fake names and addresses when I ordered my stuff!

      So I'll be able to enjoy all my new shiny goodies in pure anonymity as soon as they arrive...

    18. Re:I don't get it by kasperd · · Score: 1

      if BTC-denominated savings accounts ("eurobitcoins"), BTC futures, and BTC-denominated insurance policies come into play, the supply will be quite uncontrolled.

      What that will make uncontrolled is promises about giving out bitcoins subject to some criteria. The actual bitcoins themselves will still be limited. The question then is, at what point people will realize that a bitcoin is worth more than a promise by somebody to give you a bitcoin.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    19. Re:I don't get it by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I believe it's a monthly fee instead of a per-transaction fee.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    20. Re:I don't get it by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      > at what point people will realize that a bitcoin is worth more than a promise by somebody to give you a bitcoin.

      How is that any different than taking out a loan and promising to pay it back in the future? The risk of non-payment is embodied in the interest rate, along with the risk of you the lender not being around to enjoy the gains. Part of the reason for interest is the lender, being human, has a finite lifespan. When you make a loan you are giving up present use of the money for a larger amount in the future. Since you may not live to enjoy that future, you demand a higher amount of interest to compensate.

      Bitcoin futures and savings accounts will also come with interest rates to cover the risks of non-payment, plus a rate based on time.

    21. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't.

    22. Re:I don't get it by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      Anonymity is not a feature of bitcoin transactions or any transactions for that matter, as in order to receive a good you have to give it up at some level to receive that good. The advantage of bitcoin is the lack of central authority, it is an excellent way of transferring funds from country to country without having to go through a bank or physically bringing money across the border. The downside of bitcoin is that it is not backed by anything but the pubic perception of its value so it can be manipulated and is much more unstable because of that.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    23. Re:I don't get it by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2

      Which, from an academic perspective, is pretty cool.

      Although we're talking about mathematically scarce numbers that have no intrinsic value, so they only have value because we believe they have value. So they're only non-traditional-fiat in the sense that they're scarce, not that they're artificial. That makes them moderately less appealing than a stock share. The currency is designed to deflate infinitely, too, and has a fixed, regressive production rate to a fixed quantity. And the designer is anonymous, which is totally not suspicious. There's no way he has 100,000 personal bitcoins that he's just waiting to sell off as soon as the price hits some ridiculous level. I mean, that would be like a pyramid scheme!

      And it's decentralized... by using peer-to-peer networking to track transactions. Yeah, they just give full access to the world database of bitcoin transactions. That's totally not frightening when the database isn't FDIC insured. And as time progresses, the resources the full clients require only increases. Network latency is already a problem. Should the currency really take off, it's going to take a lot of money to operate a Bitcoin node. Well, perhaps some corporate or government interest will run it. But hey, no central bank!

      But even assuming none of those problems happens... why should the average individual use it? To replace PayPal? Sure. Everybody hates PayPal. Other than that, I don't get it. I mean, except for scarcity, what's the real difference to me as a consumer between BitCoin and, say, Microsoft Points? Or WoW gold? Why would I work in exchange for BitCoins instead of USD or Euros other than purely political reasons?

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    24. Re:I don't get it by lgw · · Score: 1

      The actual bitcoins themselves will still be limited.

      Sure, but that entirely misses the point. The amount of physical currency in circulation isn't the interesting part of the money supply.

      The question then is, at what point people will realize that a bitcoin is worth more than a promise by somebody to give you a bitcoin.

      Dollars work exactly the same way, at least to anyone who understands how money works. Everything must be discounted for risk. That doesn't stop inflation. And for "safe" investments, the risk that the promise won't be kept is significantly smaller than inflation.

      The risk that a "eurodollar" savings account won't return your money is non-zero, unlike government-insured accounts. It even be really high as such things go, like 1% or 2%. But they were still popular when they paid 10% and a US savings account paid 5.25% (and inflation was 12% or whatever - it was the Carter years).

      You can still have bitcoin inflation, and the amount by which "a promise to return a bitcoin" by a bank is worth less than one in hand will generally be less than inflation. It's only if the banking system collapses will bitcoins-in-hand be special (of course, governments will start seizing them at that point, but that's a different discussion).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    25. Re:I don't get it by lgw · · Score: 1

      Why would you believe that? The NSA has the IP addresses associated with every bitcoin transaction ever process (well, maybe they were ignoring it early on), and certainly knows the billing address associated with every IP address at any given moment, or can demand that information at a whim.

      Sure, you could just use someone else's WiFi or whatever, just like stolen credit cards are often used for illicit goods, but in that sense a bitcoin transaction is no more anonymous to the government than a CC transaction.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  6. They don't actually accept bitcoins by fastgriz · · Score: 3, Informative

    My understanding is that they provide an easy way to convert your bitcoins to USD during checkout.

    1. Re:They don't actually accept bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Negative, they accept bitcoins through a third party company (coinbase) they decide on their coinbase account weather to keep them as BTC or convert them automagically into USD and deposit them to their bank account.

    2. Re:They don't actually accept bitcoins by mythosaz · · Score: 1, Funny

      Correct. They don't so much accept "bitcoins" as they allow Coinbase to be a payment method not unlike Paypal.

    3. Re:They don't actually accept bitcoins by PRMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that I can pay directly from Mt. Gox or any other exchange or my wallet on my phone or browser or home pc or any other bitcoin-holding wallet.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  7. Re:Did he really say "fight the machine"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's good business. Bitcoin has got a lot of momentum from people who think like this and feeding their fantasies goes a long way.
     
    It's no different than the fanboys who think that everyone who supports Linux in any fashion is rabidly anti-MS. Smart sales people will lean on this because it will generate sales even if the product isn't up to spec of another product and even if what they offer is available on Windows (like Steam games).
     
    You get a lot of really delusional people throwing their money at something just to make it succeed even if you're not part of their crusade. That's why a lot of things like Bitcoin can't be taken too seriously yet... their early success is based on a consumer who's willing to pay more for less just to thumb their nose at The Man(tm).

  8. So that is "beating the system"? by mbkennel · · Score: 2


    to overthrow the tyranny of the evil payment and banking system, we will adopt a, uh, payment and banking system.

    But since the code and infrastructure is less than 6 months old and depends on companies with less cash flow than lolcats.com instead of being crufty 25 year old code from evil companies with billions of evil fiat currency tokens, it's sure to be an awesome libertarian world changer!

    1. Re:So that is "beating the system"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of Bitcoin is to replace Currency that allows a central bank to print bills as they see fit (and cause hyper-inflation), with a currency that allows inflation at a more determinable rate (block chains can only be authenticated so fast after all).

      By removing a central authority, the inflation is controlled by natural and economic laws, which were deemed better than political laws by the developer of the currency.

    2. Re:So that is "beating the system"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an interesting thought. For a given block size (number of coins, not kb), the maximum rate at which blocks could be generated and propagated would set an upper limit on currency inflation. As long as the block size is not changed this would be useful for risk models.

  9. Charlie Stross was right! by madhatter256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bitcoin is the Libertarian's Currency!

    Taken from his rant:

    "Libertarians love it because it pushes the same buttons as their gold fetish and it doesn't look like a "Fiat currency". You can visualize it as some kind of scarce precious data resource, sort of a digital equivalent of gold. Nation-states don't control the supply of it, so it promises to bypass central banks. "

    --
    Previewing comments are for sissies!
    1. Re:Charlie Stross was right! by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1

      ..same buttons as their gold fetish and it doesn't look like a "Fiat currency".

      Libertarians are certainly know for their disdain for currencies issued by car manufacturers.

    2. Re:Charlie Stross was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You can visualize it as some kind of scarce precious data resource

      Except that you can make a new round of "bitcoin2" overnight. The fact that anyone can create a new cryptocurrency prevents any kind of scarcity.

    3. Re:Charlie Stross was right! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the creation of all the other *coins has proven it is far more like paper money than it is like gold. I'll stick with dogecoin

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:Charlie Stross was right! by jatoo · · Score: 1

      But that would be a separate currency. The fact that keeps printing money doesn't reduce the scarcity of my USD.

  10. Only for US customers by Animats · · Score: 2

    This option is only available for US customers. There's no problem sending US dollars to Overstock. It would be more useful if they exported to China. But then they'd have to deal with inbound customs on the China end.

    1. Re:Only for US customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point? Everything overstock.com sell is made in China, so why not buy it at one of the 100 million markets that sell them or cheaper clones?

    2. Re:Only for US customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do export to China. I live in China and checked their website. They even quote prices in RMB. It would have been great, if bitcoins had remained easy to obtain in this country.

  11. Look ma, no reversible payments! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This might also have something to do with the fact that you can't submit a fraud claim the way you can with a credit card.

  12. Does anyone *seriously* believe this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Like so many others, he believes Bitcoin can free the world from the control of big banks and big government. 'It helps us fight the machine,' he says."

    Because big banks and big government will just go home and cry quietly in their pillows, powerless to stop either the loss of economic control or the loss of billions of dollars in transaction fees.

  13. Bitcoin != anonymity/privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As many have pointed out before, BitCoin's intent was to facilitate anonymous transactions. It's to provide an alternative to currencies which are manipulated by various governments.

    The 'semi' anonymity is a by-product of the design, but in no way should be relied upon..

  14. Why intermediary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overstock Really needs to create an option that would allow the sale of goods without intermediaries. Using intermediary, aka, Coinbase, defies the purpose of using bitcoin to begin with.

    If Overstock is that concern with the price fluctuations, they should be doing exchange in their back office (back end), not having customers to sing up for another website that they may or may not want.

    I am sure they are reading this and will address this quickly. Until that happens I will continue using Ebay.

    1. Re:Why intermediary? by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

      They pay someone else to run the exchange in their own office. Coinbase.

      As a customer, you don't have to sign up for a Coinbase account.

  15. Overworked by slapout · · Score: 1

    I don't think I'd want to use a website were the engineers "worked almost every waking hour".

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Overworked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The engineers, not necessarily any particular engineer.

      Asshat.

  16. Not for international orders (at least yet) by DarkSkiez · · Score: 1

    Which has irritated me somewhat, as it would have allowed me to bypass excessive currency conversion fees.

    1. Re:Not for international orders (at least yet) by DarkSkiez · · Score: 2

      Ah, not entirely true it turns out, I can click a link and go to their non-international version

  17. Ross was an idiot? You are made to believe that he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you believe that he gave away his identity, then you do not know the CIA/FBI work methods or methods of similar agencies anywhere around the world.

    You are made to believe that he made a mistake decribed in the newspapers.

    They have found his identity using other, most likely, unconstitutional methods. Now that they have found identity, they reversed AND searched for his traces on internet to prepare a story how exactly he was found, so that the real method is not known. It is called parallel construction. Look it up. This method is very very old by the busy bees in cloaks and daggers.

  18. Re:Did he really say "fight the machine"? by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    Dear moderator, don't you think it's a bit harsh to moderate parent "Troll"? All they are saying is that it seems a tad hypocrite for a multi-million dollar CEO to claim to be doing this "to fight the machine" while it's clearly more "to improve the bottom line" (and the free publicity doesn't hurt either). I know, it barely rises above the daily noise of hypocrite ad campaigns and politicians, and you might be so desensitized that you didn't even notice it (particularly if you're living in the US), but still, I don't think parent is particularly inflammatory. Surely there are posts more worthy of your "-1 Troll" point on this site.

  19. read the paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitpay charges retailers 1% for their service. Paypal (Visa etc..) charge between 4 and 7%. This is the major reason for both merchants and customers to prefer Bitcoin.

  20. Same reason ThinkPenguin started accepting it and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that company was wildly successful according to the CEO. A good percentage of sales are paid in bitcoins now and unlike credit cards there are no charge backs or ridiculously high merchant fees to deal with. If I were running a company I'd even be tempted to stop accepting traditional currencies / credit cards / paypal / etc. It would probably reduce losses by 3-5%. The only problem is a lot of people don't have a bitcoin client installed or bitcoins to pay with. What will be more interesting than a major retailer accepting bitcoins is when a major retailer stops accepting traditional currencies as a payment option in order undercut the competition on price. Hmm I just had a great idea for a company.

  21. Fluffy PR stunt by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If overstock was such a huge believer in bitcoin then they would accept it as a payment method. and NO this is NOT what they are doing, they are still only accepting US dollars, they are just supporting a 3rd party payment method that allows people to convert bitcoins. In exchange for this convenience they lose the ability to get a refund.

    1. Re:Fluffy PR stunt by PRMan · · Score: 1

      And gain the ability to buy a $20 item for $1.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Fluffy PR stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is being used as a unit of account—it is being used as a medium of exchange... you know... a currency.

    3. Re:Fluffy PR stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. US dollars are being used as the unit of account. you cannot pay in bitcoins. You can only pay in US dollars. A 3rd party is allowing you to convert bitcoins into the current market amount of US dollars. this is no different to you going and selling bitcoins and using US dollars to shop. overstock does not accept bitcoins in any way shape or form, they only accept US dollars. they have simply added a new place they will accept US dollars from.

    4. Re:Fluffy PR stunt by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

      I think Bitcoin is extremely cool technology, but if I had a company I would not bet the company on the stability of its price right now. I would sell off most of the bitcoins I received as payment for dollars pretty quickly, or just pay a company a small amount to do that for me. Maybe in the future when Bitcoin is accepted in more places then its price will stabilize and that will be an extra step. Bitcoin has to go through a phase where most businesses exchange it immediately to ever get near enough adoption to stabilize.

    5. Re:Fluffy PR stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your sake, I hope that's a joke. If it's a joke, it's a pretty lame joke.

  22. It helps us fight the machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm...do you know where bitcoins come from?

  23. Can't wait for Tulip vendors to accept bitcoin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the pent up demand, it will be crazy!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania

  24. LOVE THESE POSTS! by LF11 · · Score: 1, Troll

    I just love it when bitcoin posts show up on Slashdot. The circle-jerk of anti-bitcoin butthurt makes me so happy. It's quieting down, though. We've got a major retailer accepting bitcoin, now.

    Shouldn't you have gotten some bitcoins when they were $0.30 each, not so long ago?

    Some of us are paying our taxes in bitcoin. Some of us are paying for gasoline with bitcoin. I am paying for local groceries and Amazon purchases with bitcoin. How long before all you anti-bitcoin circlejerkers realize what you have missed out on? I can't wait! It makes me giggle.

    It's like watching Apple fanbois get crushed by the Android behemoth. I'm still smiling.

    1. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, that must be a damn good crack pipe.

    2. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      I actually first heard about bitcoin in mid-2011, during the first big price spike, right here on Slashdot. I started mining it back then with my wimpy graphics card. Then that got too hard, so I just started buying them directly. Then I did a crowdfunding campaign with bitcoin that raised 200% of the goal. It's been an amazing experience.

      The crowdfunding is to support a project for self-expanding automation ( https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Danielravennest/SFP/Intro ), where the automated machines make parts to expand the collection of machines. If you set up a distributed network of such machines, doing different tasks, you can use something like bitcoin to automatically pay each other when things are done.

      Machines like 3D printers are useful, but they can't do everything. You need a bunch of different ones that between them cover all the different processes for a finished item.

    3. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      In this dark European morning, your comment cracked a large smile on my sleepy face.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    4. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Shouldn't you have gotten some bitcoins when they were $0.30 each, not so long ago?

      I would have, but I had already invested all of my retirement money in Flooz, you insensitive clod.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by pantaril · · Score: 2

      I just love it when bitcoin posts show up on Slashdot. The circle-jerk of anti-bitcoin butthurt makes me so happy. It's quieting down, though. We've got a major retailer accepting bitcoin, now.

      Exactly, i'm also pretty amused by the heavily upvoted anti-bitcoin bullshit in every slashdot bitcoin story. It has been 5 years now? I wonder how long would bitcon need to stay or how widespread it would need to become for slashdot to accept it. Maybe the readers here are just too old and conservative and it will never happen, like most old people will never use internet or smartphones or online-banking. I guess when you are of some age you are too old to learn and endorse new technologies.

    6. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by SMTB1963 · · Score: 1

      This. Unfortunately some idiots with mod points (but without a sense of humor) have trashed an otherwise superlative post.

    7. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Bernie Madoff lasted decades. It was all just as worthless at the end.

    8. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by SMTB1963 · · Score: 1

      What's that sound over your head? Hint: re-read 3rd paragraph of GP.

      Maybe the readers here are just too old and conservative and it will never happen, like most old people will never use internet or smartphones or online-banking. I guess when you are of some age you are too old to learn and endorse new technologies.

      I'm tempted to blather on about how some of a certain age are foolish idiots who wouldn't make it past 30 if things got real - but that would be stoopid. Besides, your post "makes me giggle".

    9. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by LF11 · · Score: 1

      When you get right down to it, the US dollar is a giant scam. So if we assume that bitcoin is a scam...which is more scammy? Thanks, I'll take the one that isn't engineered to impoverish all but the connected elite.

    10. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by LF11 · · Score: 2

      A few months ago, I saw lots of posts ridiculing bitcoin because no major vendors accepted it. Well, now a major vendor accepts it. :) The thing is, none of these arguments have any merit whatsoever. There are problems with bitcoin, but I have never seen anyone on Slashdot know enough about bitcoin to clearly elucidate any of them.

      For a site that is so "nerd-centric", Slashdot sure has a lot of uninformed circle-jerkers. Amazing. And amusing.

    11. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by LF11 · · Score: 1

      Ouch!

    12. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by LF11 · · Score: 1

      You're welcome. :) Bitcoin does have some problems, and I dearly wish the "nerds" around here would wake up enough to learn about bitcoin so we could have a serious conversation about it. Bitcointalk and reddit are hive minds in my opinion.

      Oddly, though, the more I learn about how bitcoin works and how it is intended to work in the future, the more those problems melt away. Almost as if the problem is my own ignorance.

    13. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by LF11 · · Score: 1

      So it goes, I know I'm the browncoat in an Alliance bar. :)

    14. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by LF11 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is amazing! And a heartwarming story. Thank you! And good luck.

    15. Re:LOVE THESE POSTS! by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I experience the same thing: the more I get into ( the math and distribution system of ) BitCoin, the more my non-understanding and potential problems melt away. The problem does seem, indeed, to be the inertia of my own mind.

      This having been said, I *do* think that BitCoin may rather sooner than later be almost as important as fiduciary currency. A highly successful speculator and trader told me this week over lunch: "You know why central banks are warning against BitCoin ? On the one hand, because they have to. On the other hand - out of fear." He then told me that, as long as central banks keep warning against and ranting about BitCoin, he considers BitCoin safe. "I`ll only start being suspicious when the same central banks become hush-hush about it".

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  25. Re:Ross was an idiot? You are made to believe that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parallel construction isn't exactly legal, but the trick is you have to prove that's what happened. If they can hide the fact that they found the "safe" trail only through breaking the law, they're free to do this with impunity.

    That said, if there even IS a "safe" trail for them to find, he wasn't doing that great a job. There's a pretty simple set of things you ought to do if you really want to never be found, and he didn't do all of them.

  26. a pretty shitty return on your bits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buying crap refurbished, returned, and even outright used, products... they sell the retail equivalent of hot dog innards, the stuff that fell on the floor and got stepped on or run over by a forklift and didn't get picked up within the 5 second rule....

  27. Byrne is a PR scumbag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's got a lotta high powered money protecting his rep, and very questionable business practices. Has he been able to find an auditor yet?

  28. Classic Wired nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This writing is so funny I thought it was satire, until I checked out the linked article in Wired and discovered it was meant to be serious. So many gems per sentence, it's worth savouring the large amounts of bullshit crammed into each and every one. Just from the story summary :

      For Byrne, a rather opinionated libertarian.....

    Well, there's a good omen for what's to follow, plus plenty enough reason not to invest in his company or work for them.

      who’s unafraid to take his company places others fear to tread,

    Yes, places such as a quite poorly designed online shopping website selling clothes, clearly something so radically original and daring that no other company has ever dared contemplating such a risky and audacious strategy.

      embracing the cryptocurrency is as much a political statement as a business decision.

    And all the stuck-in-the-20th-century CEOs who thought that the way to make money was through "business decisions" rather than "political statements" will be left behind as this new approach leaves them looking like dinosaurs.

      Like so many others, he believes Bitcoin can free the world from the control of big banks and big government. 'It helps us fight the machine,' he says."

    Yeh, yeh, big government bad, taxes bad, fight the machine, blah blah, starting the revolution by selling pants online, etc, etc.

  29. Resend U.S. Business licence by Bust0ut · · Score: 1

    Bitcoins are not tender and do not include U.S. business practices. If we are to be successful, then we must "stay the course", and solve the issues we have. Bitcoins are undermining the already chaotic legal system and do no favours for anyone. Please stop.

    --
    He is crazy if you think about it; I am not.
  30. Playing Devil's Advocate for moment. by michael.ahlers · · Score: 0

    Thanks, I'll take the one that isn't engineered to impoverish all but the connected elite.

    Those who've benefitted the most by holding bitcoins are a connected elite. They're the ones who had the education, technology, and resources to understand, use, and acquire units of the currency. As Bitcoin becomes increasingly popular in the mainstream (with people who've had less access to the aforementioned benefits), those in that small group closer to the beginning will enjoy a substantial rise in the value of their bitcoins. That's fair, of course, but don't pretend you're part of a populist movement.

  31. And they're becoming the new machine.... by nhat11 · · Score: 1

    And the world goes around and around.