Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Moon Rover Says an Early Goodnight

hackingbear writes "The Chinese moon rover, Jade Rabbit, encountered an abnormality in its control mechanism before its planned sleep during the 14-day-long lunar night. In the form of a diary, the Jade Rabbit said, "The shi-fu ('kung-fu masters,' meaning the scientists and engineers) are working around the clock trying to fix the problem and their eyes look like a rabbit's (red due to fatigue), but I may not be able to survive over this lunar night." (translated, original in Chinese.) The rover landed on the moon on Dec 14 and was designed to operate for three months."

284 comments

  1. Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ours just keep going and going... like the Energizer bunny.

    1. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mars doesn't have 2 week long nights without an atmosphere. The Mars rovers get a nice helping of solar power each 24 hr period. If there is a software glitch, you can just fix it the next day. That doesn't work on the Moon.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And one of them is powered by RTG.

    3. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure yours stopped working about 40 years ago.

    4. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For perspective's sake, Spirit got stuck in a reboot loop on January 21, 2004, and was down until February 6th when they finished debugging what turned out to be a problem with the flash filesystem.

      If their fault turns out to be more serious, or their system lacks the failsafe systems that would allow recovery from a modestly serious bug, then some snarking may be in order; but they are still within the 'scrambling for a fix' window.

    5. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Megane · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I read TFS right, this rover failed before even reaching the first night. So it's had 7/24 sunlight since landing.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    6. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ours just keep going and going... like the Energizer bunny.

      Hopefully, that little guy will get to come home one day.

    7. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      And, on Mars, you would fix it the next day. On the Moon the rover would be frozen solid by then.

    8. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by sconeu · · Score: 4

      For some reason, that XKCD always makes me sad.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by ralphsiegler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mar's "atmosphere" has about a half a percent of the pressure of Earth's. The rovers do NOT get a nice helping of solar power while they hibernate for five months of martian winter.

    10. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the occasional dust-devil to clean the solar panels.

    11. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure yours stopped working about 40 years ago.

      What are you talking about? The US has never had an autonomous rover on the Moon.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    12. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      USA! USA! USA!

      How about cheering when you actually accomplish something, rather than when one of your opponents fumbles, hmm?

    13. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Artifakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have too! Several in fact. The first two were named Neil and Buzz. Autonomous as all hell...

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    14. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by danceswithtrees · · Score: 1

      I remember watching a documentary about the rover years ago. The lead scientist, Squires (sp?), talked about how if the launch was successful, he would never see the rovers again. Bittersweet to think about sinking years of effort into designing and fabricating something and then hoping you would never get to touch or set eyes on it again.

    15. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the lunar atmosphere is less than one hundred trillionth of Earth's atmospheric density. Seems that your brain has been deprived of oxygen somewhere else.

    16. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      XKCD cultists always make me sad.

    17. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by cyfer2000 · · Score: 2

      I heard from unconfirmed source that the problem was mechanical. The solar panels of the "Jade Rabbit" can fold and can act as covers to prevent heat from escaping. One of the solar panels failed to fold.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    18. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Spirit got stuck in a reboot loop on January 21, 2004, and was down until February 6th

      That was right after it drilled into a pyramid shaped rock. I wonder if China messed with a pyramid or obelisk also.

    19. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Spirit got stuck in a reboot loop on January 21, 2004, and was down until February 6th.....problem with the flash filesystem

      From that came one of the greatest Biblical space jokes ever: "The Spirit is willing but the flash it weak".

    20. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure... except we had our shares of total or partial failures in our unmanned space program too. The first *six* lunar probes in the 1960's Ranger program failed. We lost Mariners 3 and 8 and Mars Observer. Oh, and we cocked up Hubble's primary mirror because somebody installed a test jig backward, which shows how big missions depend on countless small things to go right.

      Anyhow it's too early to count Jade Rabbit out. Glitches are a fairly regular feature of space missions, if you follow them. It's still quite possible they'll fiddle the thing back into operation.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    21. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Do we have any Mars rovers close enough to the poles to not get sunlight in winter? I don't think so, which means they all get at least some sunlight in every 25 hour day, unless dust storms blot out the sun. Considering that they're basically in a cheap vacuum thermos it shouldn't take much in the way of a low-wattage heater to keep them warm. Lunar rovers get an even better thermos bottle effect, but those 709-hours days make for some long, cold nights.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    22. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to troll the /. audience, but if nuclear research was more accepted the power and thermal source would be nuclear and not solar. This issue would have never happened.

    23. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's entering its second lunar night - it landed on the Moon on December 14th.

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    24. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by dryeo · · Score: 4, Informative

      TFS said it landed on Dec 14th. Assuming it landed at dawn, sunset would have been about the 28th and the sun would have returned about the 11th with its second night starting about the 24th. Since this is the 25th, my numbers are probably slightly off but either way this has to be the second night and it did survive the first night. Not bad for a first attempt, took a few tries for the Americans and Soviets to successfully soft land on the Moon.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    25. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do we have any Mars rovers close enough to the poles to not get sunlight in winter?

      The non-roving Phoenix Mars probe landed sufficiently far north that reduced sunlight due to an approaching winter caused its (expected) failure. It most likely got buried by carbon dioxide ice later on anyway - orbital photos showed its solar panels got crushed...

      For keeping space probes warm, radioisotope heater units are pretty common. Apparently the Chinese Moon rover has them - but it sounds like it hasn't successfully closed itself up in order to keep heat inside.

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    26. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      A fair few spacecraft are nuclear powered... Spirit and Opportunity were solar; but Curiosity is rocking an MMRTG around the Martian surface as we speak.

      I don't know why the Chinese decided to go solar, possibly weight, possibly difficulty in sourcing RTG fuel; but certainly neither the US nor the Russians have been squeamish about nuclear power in space when the mission called for it.

    27. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Maritz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Spirit got stuck in a reboot loop on January 21, 2004, and was down until February 6th.....problem with the flash filesystem

      From that came one of the greatest Biblical space jokes ever: "The Spirit is willing but the flash it weak".

      Must be really something to fight its way to the upper echelons of great bible space jokes.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    28. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by skovnymfe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't that pretty much any developers dream?

    29. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No new plutonium is allowed to be manufactured because of nuclear weapon proliferation agreements, which also results in plutonium shortages for space exploration. NASA is running low, and Russia is not selling any of their stockpile anymore, possibly because they are running low too.

      http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/09/plutonium-238-problem/

    30. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn those Pesky Facts!

      --
      No sig today...
    31. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They probably went solar because they are building up to a permanent base and want to test the technologies they will need. An MMRTG has a limited lifespan and while the moon isn't too far away to send replacements there is no real advantage over solar. On Mars you have dust and wind to contend with, but there is none of that on the moon.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      In the realm of interplanetary probes, I'd say using RTG is just a design decision - not cheating.

    33. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      No dust storms on Mars? or up to 24 minutes of communication lag?

      Between the two, I'd call Mars a bigger challenge - not that the Moon is easy.

      Personally, if I were running a program like this, I'd "land" a practice rover (or ten) somewhere like the summit of Mauna Kea and do remote operations with simulations of things like the lunar night, time lags, etc.

    34. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Had to look it up, but parent is right about Mars having ~24hr days (24:40 to be exact). I never realized that.

    35. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      The first *six* lunar probes in the 1960's Ranger program failed. We lost Mariners 3 and 8 and Mars Observer.

      I don't think this is quite fair. Technology in the 1960s was downright primitive; that was a time when computers took up whole rooms, and car engines had their fuel metered by Rube Goldbergesque all-mechanical contraptions rather than electronic control systems. Space exploration was brand-new. It's not too surprising that a bunch of late 50s/early 60s-tech space probes crapped out; it was amazing if they worked at all.

      Anyone launching probes these days has access to far more scientific knowledge and engineering expertise and technology. Anyone these days can buy an Arduino at Radio Shack and put it to use fairly quickly doing things that would have required a huge engineering team and lots of expensive hardware (taking up a lot more space) back in 1960. You can't really compare the two.

    36. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So it's past the 30 (Earth) day warranty period. Hope they bought the extended warranty and on-site repair for it.

    37. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I'm not an exert on Chinese moon probes, but I thing it was solid when it left.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    38. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by ultranova · · Score: 2

      On the Moon the rover would be frozen solid by then.

      So? What's going to get damaged, exactly speaking?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    39. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember watching a documentary about the rover years ago. The lead scientist, Squires (sp?), talked about how if the launch was successful, he would never see the rovers again. Bittersweet to think about sinking years of effort into designing and fabricating something and then hoping you would never get to touch or set eyes on it again.

      If the launch was not successful, he would still never see it again. It would be blown to bits.

    40. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider it more likely that a museum will be built around it wherever its wheels rotate for the last time. Transporting rovers back to earth will have very low priority over samples from Mars when/if we get the ability to transport anything from Mars to Earth and if such transports ever become so routine that the rover could be tossed on a spacecraft with lots of other cargo, Mars will have a permanent human settlement and what would the point then be to transport it back to Earth? It will become a tourist attraction.

      Although I do agree that the cartoon did make me feel sorry for the rover...

    41. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True - but Mars has actual weather like sand storms that blow grit into every surface - axel and actuator, and onto solar cells reducing power input. Mars is also farther away so photons are more dispersed.

    42. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Transporting rovers back to earth will have very low priority over samples from Mars when/if we get the ability to transport anything from Mars to Earth

      However, parts of it could possibly come back. Consider Apollo 12 bringing back parts of Surveyor 3 for study.

    43. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      So? What's going to get damaged, exactly speaking?

      The batteries, most importantly.

    44. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Due to that sarcasm, I'm not going to tell you the second-rate ones.

    45. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it didnt come with anything longer than a you have no rights 14 day warranty, The magic hand takes care of the rest.

    46. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous poster was suggesting that the panels fold over during dark periods as a form of insulation to prevent the thermal radiation from the RTG from escaping. I read a similar report somewhere when the problem first occurred, don't recall the source. There is indeed an RTG onboard in addition to the solar panels, as reported by other stories around the net.

    47. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China took less attempts to even get a probe their than you did.

    48. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Correct.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    49. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by mirix · · Score: 1

      It still amazes me they went from 'first thing from earth to crash into the moon' in 1959, to a soft landing in 1966, or soft landings with transmissions from venus in 1970.

      The fact that anything could land on venus and transmit home for an hour is pretty amazing, really. Atmospheric pressure is something like 92 atm, temperature is 450C, it's all CO2 with clouds of sulphuric acid... incredible anything survives that, and radios home!

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    50. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those US rovers are wearing out too: http://xkcd.com/893/

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    51. Re: Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      36 hour period I think.

    52. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russian and American spacecraft landed nearly 50 years ago when nothing was known about the nature of the moon and electronics were primitive. The Chinese had all the experience of the Russians and Americans craft plus all the advances of the electronics for space to draw from. China has shown that when they cannot innovate even when they have someone to directly copy from

    53. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after crashing two into and firing one past mars orbit by blatant ignorance of international measurement units...

      http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20000813

    54. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sublime joy of creating an intractably complex system from scratch then never having to see the damn thing again.

    55. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The little bastards didn't even follow the mission plan. Right from the start they made their own decisions.

    56. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Aaaaaaw....

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    57. Re:Meanwhile, back in America by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Had to look it up, but parent is right about Mars having ~24hr days (24:40 to be exact). I never realized that.

      Several years ago, Scott Maxwell - one of the more recent Mars rover drivers - wrote an app for his phone to tell him what the time was on Mars, because he, like many of the rest of the rover management team, was required to work on a Martian day-night cycle, not a terrestrial one. So that meant slipping 2 hours on the clock every 3 earthly day-night cycles.

      He now write software for some American company, but still tweets as #Marsroverdriver. Once a Mars rover driver, always a Mars rover driver.

      I bet your job title isn't so cool.

      (And he comes to Slashdot too, from time to time.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. 90 Days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that this rover and this rover measure 90 days in a different fashion.

  3. Made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They just don't make rovers like they use to

    1. Re:Made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Made in China, means that it will fail prematurely, if not, it will explode, poison or kill someone in the process.

    2. Re:Made in China by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Made in China, means that it will fail prematurely, if not, it will explode, poison or kill someone in the process.

      If it manages to poison or kill someone from the moon, I'll be impressed.

      Anyone know how to say "I surrender" in Mandarin?

    3. Re:Made in China by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Gòngchndng s

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose some of the parts were made in the same China factory that makes shoes ?
      All of my shoes I purchased that were made in China fall-apart within a few weeks.
      Perhaps it's a case of what comes-around goes-around.

  4. (insert bad lip sync here) by !-!appy_!!arnian · · Score: 1

    Rover talk like Kung-Fu Panda's dad

    --
    To serve only self is the ultimate slavery.
    1. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Rover talk like Kung-Fu Panda's dad

      Only because of the bad translation. For instance, although "shi fu" can mean "kung fu master", it can also mean any master or expert, and that is clearly what it means in this context. Note to Slashdot editors: Next time, instead of using cut-and-paste from Google translate, find someone that actually understands the language.

    2. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rover talk like Kung-Fu Panda's dad

      Only because of the bad translation. For instance, although "shi fu" can mean "kung fu master", it can also mean any master or expert, and that is clearly what it means in this context. Note to Slashdot editors: Next time, instead of using cut-and-paste from Google translate, find someone that actually understands the language.

      Remember all the jokes about the silly English translations you see when traveling in China? Well, that's because when China was poor, they have to do the translation to satisfy English visitors. So it was *always* some Chinese's fault when Google Translate gave something stupid.

      Now that China got richer, well, we started to see cases when the table was turned, we see translation errors just as silly. Only now, in these cases, you cannot point at some Chinese and laugh at how stupid they were.

      And, yes, "shi fu" is a general term of "master" of any kind. English natives like Americans usually take it to mean "kung fu master" because that's the only kind of master from China that they can see on TV shows and movies. "Shi fu" is commonly used as a respectful title for referring and addressing to technical workers, including plumbers, electrician, drivers, and of course, programmers and other high-tech workers. Such as asking a plumber: "Shi fu, can this be fixed? how much would this cost?" Nobody in China would automatically take "Shi fu" to mean "Kung fu master", unless you are already in a kung fu school.

    3. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      And, yes, "shi fu" is a general term of "master" of any kind. English natives like Americans usually take it to mean "kung fu master"

      Actually most Americans think "shi fu" is a gray coated Red Panda. That also happens to be a Kung Fu master.

    4. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by narcc · · Score: 1

      Note to Chinese Rovers: Next time, find a better language.

    5. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to Slashdot editors: Next time, instead of using cut-and-paste from Google translate, find someone that actually understands the language.

      This is Slashdot we're talking about. The editors can't be arsed to fix errors even in English text, let alone in translations.

    6. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, only if you think "shi fu" is promounced "sheefoo", it's actually more like "shirfoo". "Sheefoo" (which is closer to the pinyin xifu), could mean young woman or several other things. Then again "Master Shifu" actually means "Master Master", so it doesn't really make sense in the first place.

    7. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by dkasak · · Score: 1

      "kung fu" is an alternative transliteration of (gngfu) which means "skill attained through hard work and effort". In this sense the term "kung fu" can signify a very high profficiency in any skill or art, not just martial arts. In fact, the connotation of "kung fu" with martial arts came about only in the 20th century. Therefore, the shi fu of science and engineering can be said to have a great gongfu (kung fu) in science and engineering.

    8. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by dkasak · · Score: 1

      Oh god, Slashdot still doesn't support Unicode in comments? If anyone is interested, my previous comment should have contained the Chinese characters and pinyin for "gongfu" as can be seen here.

    9. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      So Master Shifu (from Kung foo panda) is repetitive just like Mt. Midoriyama (yama means mountain).

      I'll never be able to enjoy that cartoon again...

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    10. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they pronounce it wrong. It should sound more like "shirt" without the t.

    11. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Kung Fu means mastering something through hard work. The bastardization that Kung Fu = fighting come from American Cinema, an the import of action movies from China.

      Also, for tricking us into thinking the Chinese wash cloths with Ancient Secrets.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:(insert bad lip sync here) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when you call a plumber out to a kung fu school? Does it get confusing?

  5. But but but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was assured that the species must tremble at the might of China's space program? Maybe they forgot to pack a 3D printer to make spare parts?

    1. Re:But but but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lol. If I were you, I'd be worried about how relieved I am, and how quick I am to jump on this failure.

  6. Good luck by oldhack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know. Something like this supersede geopolitics, nationalism, etc., at least for now.

    Good luck, Chinese comrades.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Good luck by tippe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think I agree with this. If the big picture is having humans become space faring (in a meaningful way; not just doing a handfull of short visits to a nearby lifeless rock), then having the Chinese be successful at their space endeavours should be as important to us as it is to them. In the big picture, we are all human, and if the Chinese are successful of conquering space (in a way that the US, Russia, Europe, etc., haven't been able to do), then we all win. Also, if they fail, then so too do we.

      Gook luck, Chinese comrades indeed.

    2. Re:Good luck by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to believe that if we were attacked by aliens all the people of Earth would put aside our petty differences, rally together, and be on the same side for once.

      Of course I'd like to believe we would do that anyway, but I really think it would take an alien invasion to make it happen. *sigh*

    3. Re:Good luck by slashmydots · · Score: 0

      Really? Because I've seen a hostorical pattern of anything made in China being low quality crap that breaks instantly because all their engineering and technology is stolen, second-rate crap. I would put money on poor engineering or stolen technology not working properly being behind this one.

    4. Re:Good luck by Immerman · · Score: 1

      >and be on the same side for once.

      Would that side happen to be as appetizers with a little lemon juice for flavor? If an alien race capable of traveling between stars ever attacks Earth, our technology will be so badly outclassed that we won't stand a chance.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Because I've seen a hostorical pattern of anything made in China being low quality crap that breaks instantly because all their engineering and technology is stolen, second-rate crap. I would put money on poor engineering or stolen technology not working properly being behind this one.

      Low quality crap like the iPhone? The MacBook? The iPod? Prada and Burberry handbags? Nike shoes? Yeah, China produces low quality crap just like the US, Canada and Mexico can produce low quality crap but that doesn't mean they can't (or don't) also produce decent stuff too.

    6. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..."We are all human"...
      Well then: we are all doomed.

    7. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be right. You might not. The correct answer is that you don't know.

    8. Re:Good luck by N!k0N · · Score: 1

      Unless they're horribly slow to adopt new technologies/strategies/etc, and assume that we've had no meaningful advances since the Crusades.

    9. Re:Good luck by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the Chinese are the current bad guys you are supposed to be scared of, stealing your jobs and selling you defective crap.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Good luck by Immerman · · Score: 1

      No, I don't know for 100% certain, but that's the way to bet. Point:
      (1) Our sun is a latecomer to the game. The galaxy has been producing sunlike stars long enough that, using Earth as a template, life had plenty time to evolve on alter-Earths to modern day levels long before single cell life evolved here 4 billion years ago. And that completely neglects life that may have evolved around other star types, which are far more common, and often far older.
      (2) Given those time frames the level of technological imbalance between two races is far, *far* more likely to be thousands or millions of years than decades or centuries.
      (3) If an alien race is capable of crossing between stars, the imbalance is *not* going to be be in our favor
      (4) With space superiority it's trivial to use even kinetic energy weapons on a planet (drop rocks) to decimate the surface and ecosystem to the desired level, even if they have no specific weapon technology. Heck, with drive systems capable of interstellar travel it's probably not hard to make a kinetic energy weapon capable of literally shattering the Earth.
      (5) Any species that decides to wage interstellar war probably also has sophisticated weapon technology.
      (6) It's pretty unlikely that our biology will be at all compatible, theirs will probably be based on completely different amino acids, if it's even that similar to ours - so unless they're in it for slave labor or the thrill of subjugation they're unlikely to have much reason to keep our biosphere alive, which makes planetary conquest much easier.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    11. Re:Good luck by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Even then - if they're thousands or millions of years more advanced than us, which would be the way to bet, just how much progress have we really made? Nukes might be something that would get their attention, but then again maybe not.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    12. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans would sell their neighbor out for a hamburger.

    13. Re:Good luck by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Even then - if they're thousands or millions of years more advanced than us, which would be the way to bet, just how much progress have we really made? Nukes might be something that would get their attention, but then again maybe not.

      Read a few science fiction novels. This has been discussed and "simulated" for longer than we have been alive...

    14. Re:Good luck by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the vast majority show aliens that are not all that much more technologically advanced than us, or rely on some sort of deus ex machina to let the plucky low-tech humans come out ahead. I love SF as much as the next geek, but the vast majority doesn't make any attempt to realistically portray encounters with an alien civilization. A million years ago we were little more than apes, 60 million years ago we were more like rodents. From our perspective an alien race with that kind of timeframe worth of evolution and development as a technological society will likely be almost indistiguishable from gods, and we'd better all pray hard if we want some deus ex machina to save our asses if they decide to conquer us, because that's the only realistic chance we'd have.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  7. Enought with the nationalist crap by Art+Challenor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Jade Rabbit is an awesome piece of scientific equipment, and it's on the moon. Let's hope if makes it through the night and continues to send data that will benefit all of humanity.

    1. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by NetNinja · · Score: 1

      Here here. To exploration and the betterment of all mankind.

    2. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by CrankyFool · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just as an FYI because you may appreciate knowing, it's actually "hear hear." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

    3. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hear, hear" actually. Think about it, what could your version possibly imply?

    4. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by tippe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe we should just use "hear here", just to cover all of our bases. That's what I do, anyway.

    5. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe we should just use "hear here", just to cover all of our bases.

      Their, there, now.

    6. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by ihtoit · · Score: 5, Informative

      it was a visual inspection, in situ, of Lunar regolith that added weight to the theory of Lunar origin being a result of an impact event on Earth.

      How does this benefit all of humanity? Well, it adds credibility to the many and repeated proposals to exploit the Lunar surface for mineral resources which are demonstrably similar to the proportions found here on Earth, with obvious exceptions being fossil fuels. There is a wealth undreamed of, of such elements as gold, silver, uranium, thorium, lithium, platinum, silicon, lead, even the much lighter and exotic elements such as helium-3 (which alone occurs in quantities enough to solve the energy demand until the sun dies), just waiting for Humanity to quit with the fighting over specific claims over resources on this planet. When (if) that ever comes to pass, then we will be one step closer to expanding our influence for good or bad across the rest of the Solar system.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    7. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, we already knew that the periodic table of elements is pretty much the same all across the universe. Thank you.

      "then we will be one step closer to expanding our influence for good or bad across the rest of the Solar system."

      And there we go. Every time. We go from pictures of rocks to fantasies about the species and its glorious manifest destiny. Do you put "Space Nutter" as your religion on the Census?

    8. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      What could Jade Rabbit teach us that wasn't already learned by Kim Jung Il during his trip to the moon?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

      And how many people died producing it for the glorious People's Republic?

      China sucks. It sucked before it was colonized, it sucked WHILE it was colonized, and it's especially sucked since the US sold itself to it.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    10. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we already knew that the periodic table of elements is pretty much the same all across the universe. Thank you.

      You might as well argue that chemistry is a closed field then, now that the table of elements has been established... In reality knowing the isotropic ratio of what elements are in a specific rock is important to determining geological history. Even if you don't care about the history of the moon, getting more extreme tests of that type helps work on models used for geology on Earth which does have direct use in things including industry. Regardless of whether exploring the moon was worth the costs, the data exists now and some of us in the geology field can at least take advantage of that.

    11. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What do you even know about China? Did you know that it was home to the largest and most advanced city humanity would ever see until 19th century London?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    12. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Yes, we already knew that the periodic table of elements is pretty much the same all across the universe.

      That wasn't his point at all, as I hope you know. He was describing how it helped us project the specific mineral makeup of the moon, which, though falling on the same periodic table, does not necessarily have to be the same as that of the earth.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    13. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by M8e · · Score: 1

      Hare hare!

    14. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China sucks. It sucked before it was colonized, it sucked WHILE it was colonized, and it's especially sucked since the US sold itself to it.

      Yes, because genocide of all the native Americans was a great way to make a non-sucky society.

    15. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by dryeo · · Score: 1

      It's Lunar regolith, bedrock that has been repeatably crushed and stirred up and never having had water to concentrate elements as on the Earth (and perhaps Mars) and the Helium 3 is so thinly dispersed (0.01 ppm to 0.05 ppm) on the surface that it would be easier to mine it from Saturns atmosphere or synthesize it here. There are probably concentrated deposits of iron and such from meteor impacts but other then that most lunar mining is going to be hard to do profitably.
      BTW, the Moon does not have the same proportions of elements as Earth, for a starts it is missing many volatiles. I think you're thinking of the isotope ratios which are very similar to Earths, so similar that it brings into question the Moon being formed by a collision with the proto-planet Thera as it is estimated as less then 1% chance of Theora being identical to the Earth in isotope ratios..

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    16. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by G-forze · · Score: 1

      Hair, hair!

      --
      "There's someone in my head but it's not me." - Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
    17. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's the "space nutter" troll! This is a dude who despises/ridicules anyone who thinks it's reasonable to shoot a rocket into the sky for any purpose, ever. Basically a spastic Luddite. Safe to ignore, in other words.

    18. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You derped it up. There is an estimated 1 million tons of HE3 on the moon. The leading HE3 fusion power researchers estimate that 40 tons of HE3 will power the USA for one year in 2013 energy quantity. That's 25,000 years for 300 million of the 7.5 billion people at a linear demand. Helium3 is more expensive per molecular weight than diamonds because it is so rare. The exclusive reason PEOPLE WANT to destroy the lunar vacuum by mining an untested, unproven gas with no known other benefit is to get MONEY. You know, my trust in people's reasons for maintaining their own existence is starting to wear very thin. I wonder if the space cowboys will let us stupid rock monkeys stay for a while or just remove us with a fucking space scalpel like a fucking space cancer.

    19. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by rvw · · Score: 1

      "Hear, hear" actually. Think about it, what could your version possibly imply?

      That the Chinese should take us seriously! For once!

    20. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by rvw · · Score: 2

      What could Jade Rabbit teach us that wasn't already learned by Kim Jung Il during his trip to the moon?

      How we can keep him there next time!

    21. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Where where?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      It's also useless anyway. He 3 is much harder to fuse than what we're trying to do already. Just do deuterium + tritium and forget about the rest.
      Alternatively if you insist so much on aneutronic fusion while not caring about the wasted expenses and energy, there's proton + boron fusion. Any fusion of stuff heavier than D + T would be done in the 22th century or later after D + T fusion or perfect energy storage have brought up a post-scarcity world anyway.

    23. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're there!

    24. Re:Enought with the nationalist crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hare hair!

  8. I do hope they resolve it by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do hope they resolve the problem and keep going. It would be such an embarassment to China to have it fail on it's first night out.

    You can make all the jokes you want about "Cheap Chinese Crap" you want, but you know as well as I do that when it comes to stuff that isn't intended for the dollar store sale bins, China can make as good a piece of hardware as anyone else. They wouldn't have made it to the moon in the first place if their rocket had been built with toy-maker electronics instead of mil-spec.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:I do hope they resolve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be such an embarassment to China to have it fail on it's first night out.

      i don't get why it would be such an embarrassment: it's science and not everyone gets it right the first time.

      there's a lot to learn from this (if it fails) and it's nice to see the chinese make some progress on this front.

    2. Re:I do hope they resolve it by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2

      I do hope they resolve the problem and keep going. It would be such an embarassment to China to have it fail on it's first night out.

      You can make all the jokes you want about "Cheap Chinese Crap" you want, but you know as well as I do that when it comes to stuff that isn't intended for the dollar store sale bins, China can make as good a piece of hardware as anyone else. They wouldn't have made it to the moon in the first place if their rocket had been built with toy-maker electronics instead of mil-spec.

      Or if they hadn't raided the US aerospace industry with APTs.

    3. Re:I do hope they resolve it by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Except they get their tech from the Russians (while we still are scrounging around with the stuff we stole from the Germans after WWII).

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:I do hope they resolve it by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Except they get their tech from the Russians (while we still are scrounging around with the stuff we stole from the Germans after WWII).

      Uh huh. And just where do you think the Russians got their tech from?

    5. Re:I do hope they resolve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...China can make as good a piece of hardware as anyone else." and yet, they don't.

    6. Re:I do hope they resolve it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can make all the jokes you want about "Cheap Chinese Crap" you want, but you know as well as I do that when it comes to stuff that isn't intended for the dollar store sale bins, China can make as good a piece of hardware as anyone else.

      Sorry, I don't know that.

      They wouldn't have made it to the moon in the first place if their rocket had been built with toy-maker electronics instead of mil-spec.

      They did today what we did with the technology of the 1960s. Am I supposed to be impressed here? Because I am not. When a nation is fifty years behind another nation, that is not impressive.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:I do hope they resolve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're going forward, you're going backward. Be sure that none of your kids hears about this everlution stuff eh? lol. America's in decline get used to it. Teaching of science in the doldrums and science/eng ridiculed culturally. The Kardashians are as good as it gets for you now. Sry :-/

    8. Re:I do hope they resolve it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They're going forward, you're going backward.

      Oh yeah, I'll grant you that. But how much further can they go forward? What happens to their economy when ours plummets when theirs is really based on bullshit anyway?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:I do hope they resolve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Home grown mostly. They didn't get the best Germans and didn't trust them anyway. A number of the early works on rocketry were by Russians. Of course the Americans had a rocket programme before any Germans were brought over too.

  9. Re: Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious what made in USA piece of electronics you're using to write that comment ...

  10. Re: Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right, *more designed in China crap.

  11. language of the heart foolproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    raises the senses & spirits of all of us at once? those are not wind sprites?

  12. I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...an hour later and Jade Rabbit will be hungry for waking again.

  13. Re:fracked by interdomestic terrorist can't do wel by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    What is that, neocon word salad?

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  14. Shi-fu doesn't equal 'Kung-Fu Master' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Shi-fu/Sifu is not a term specific to a 'kung-fu master'. It is refers to someone who is skilled in a profession or of high experience. Likewise, in Japanese the term 'sensi' doesn't equate to a 'karate master', it too is used to refer to someone skilled or experienced, such as a doctor, teacher, or even mentor.

    1. Re:Shi-fu doesn't equal 'Kung-Fu Master' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn it...it is "sensei", not "sensi"...

      CAPTCHA: dwindled

      Must be referring to my intelligence.

    2. Re:Shi-fu doesn't equal 'Kung-Fu Master' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been wondering for a while now. How come you always print the captcha?

    3. Re:Shi-fu doesn't equal 'Kung-Fu Master' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Senshi' (which is what 'sensi' can also be romanized to) does mean a 'warrior' so hey, maybe your luck half overcame the dwindled intelligence!

    4. Re:Shi-fu doesn't equal 'Kung-Fu Master' by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      Maybe you've just been smoking too much sensi....

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  15. Kung-fu? by thue · · Score: 1

    > The shi-fu ('kung-fu masters,' meaning the scientists and engineers)

    According to Wikipedia, shifu means master craftsman. Though that obviously also covers kung-fu masters, I don't think that is what the Chinese were alluding to!

    I think somebody has been watching too many Hong Kong kung-fu movies.

    1. Re:Kung-fu? by tippe · · Score: 1

      "Shi-fu" are what Kung-fu black-belts are called. Similar to "sensei" for karate, I think. I don't think the use of 'shi-fu' was incorrect or un-intended; it's what they meant to say.

    2. Re:Kung-fu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both Shi-fu and sensei are also used for outside the martial art area to means the "master" of an area out of proper respect.
      It just that *our* only context for that word is from martial art movies.

    3. Re:Kung-fu? by dkasak · · Score: 1

      See this.

  16. Nothing to do with kung fu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Shifu" means any sort of skilled manual worker, no Chinese people would think of kung fu when seeing it used in this manner. It's the common way to address mechanics, plumbers, taxi drivers etc. More slashdotters probably speak Japanese than Chinese, so consider if the submitter had written something like "Yamada-sensei (martial arts master Yamada, meaning a scientist)" - it's just as misleading as this.

    *Yes, I know "sensei" is not the same word as "shifu" (and the characters would have been here if Slashdot supported unicode), but it's equivalent in that it *can* mean a martial arts master but the common meaning is completely different.

  17. Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and already this USA #1-bullshit. Your country is the biggest melting pot of foreign scientists and researchers in the world, and there is nothing made in the USA today which does not build upon and directly involve talent from all over the world. You are not entitled.

    The Chinese have made the whole world proud with this achievement, and you should not let your envy and superiority complex get the better of you.

    1. Re:Only one page of comments by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is a really weird feeling. I'm 90% sure you're a Chinese propagandist, but I 100% agree with your words.

    2. Re:Only one page of comments by uofitorn · · Score: 1

      So you're only 10% sure it's a troll?

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    3. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there is nothing made in China today that does not build upon technology and ideas stolen from other countries. You are not entitled.

    4. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, 10% retarded.

    5. Re:Only one page of comments by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      You're talking about people who invented the compass. Navigation relative to magnetic fields is kind of a big deal. I'll spare you the litany of other things.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    6. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your country is the biggest melting pot of foreign scientists and researchers in the world, and there is nothing made in the USA today which does not build upon and directly involve talent from all over the world. You are not entitled.

      Only one page of comments and already a bigot spews some mouth diarrhea about how America's achievements are not "ethnically pure". Heil Hitler much, jackass? Oh wait... you probably do.

      The Chinese have made the whole world proud with this achievement, and you should not let your envy and superiority complex get the better of you.

      Whoa there! - Laying on the jingoism a little thick now, aren't we now...?

      Those "foreigners" come to America to escape the likes of bigots and tin pot dictators and censors like yourself - only for their achievements to be later demonized and attacked by the likes of you. Now scuttle off to bash America in countless other forums and comment boards because America bashing propaganda work is never done, right?! The American running dogs must be stopped!!

    7. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a really weird feeling (...) but I 100% agree with your words.

      Um... takes one to know one?? ;-P

    8. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what have they done in the last 1500 years?

    9. Re:Only one page of comments by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, let's see, they invented movable type printing, a calendar that was as accurate as the Gregorian but developed hundreds of years earlier, percussive cap drilling that was capable of the deepest wells in the early 19th century, paper currency, watertight compartments partitioning ships, dental fillings, dominoes, clockwork escapements, forensic entomology, multi-stage rocketry, pontoon bridges, toilet paper, electronic cigarettes, Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for Down's Syndrome, Synthesis of crystalline bovine insulin, and I know it's cliche, but since you arbitrarily set the period at 1500 years I have to include gunpowder.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    10. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but other than movable type printing, a calendar that was as accurate as the Gregorian but developed hundreds of years earlier, percussive cap drilling that was capable of the deepest wells in the early 19th century, paper currency, watertight compartments partitioning ships, dental fillings, dominoes, clockwork escapements, forensic entomology, multi-stage rocketry, pontoon bridges, toilet paper, electronic cigarettes, non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for Down's Syndrome, synthesis of crystalline bovine insulin, and gunpowder what have the Chinese ever done for us?

    11. Re:Only one page of comments by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Brought peace?

      ;-P

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    12. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and already this USA #1-bullshit. Your country is the biggest melting pot of foreign scientists and researchers in the world, and there is nothing made in the USA today which does not build upon and directly involve talent from all over the world. You are not entitled.

      The Chinese have made the whole world proud with this achievement, and you should not let your envy and superiority complex get the better of you.

      We (USA) know that we're biggest melting pot of foreign scientists and researchers in the world. It's one of the things that's drummed in us from elementary school forward as to why the USA is so very successful. We get all the best from everywhere and they soon become just as "superiority complex" Americans as the ones whose ancestors got here 400 years ago. And their kids are even worse it sometimes seems.

      However, I totally agree that the schadenfreude about the Jade Rabbit's problem is immature and uncalled for.
      After all, it was the Chinese that invented rockets in the first place.

    13. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but we are talking about a 60 year old government and it has contributed little in its time.

    14. Re:Only one page of comments by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      What's great about the US is that we welcome people from all countries and backgrounds. We should be proud of our multi-culturalism unlike the exclusionary Chinese pride that everything can be done by the Chinese.

      We're proud of our pragmatism and pointing out the failures of blind nationalism trumping all else. The Mars Rover was first and foremost a nationalist chest bumping to prop up a political regime--and a scientific mission second. That's not unlike the cold war but at least in the cold war we weren't at all ashamed of bringing in the best (from Russia) to work with us and design our program.

    15. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see, so can I have a gereen card?

    16. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't see it, do you? There is _nothing_ made _anywhere_ which does not build upon previous research and invention, and involve research and scientists from all over the world. Not in the U.S, not in China, not anywhere, but the ignorant Americans still insist that everything is invented by Americans and the rest of the world just steals it.

    17. Re:Only one page of comments by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The Chinese have made the whole world proud with this achievement,"
      proud? no. Good job, keep it up, well done? yes. Proud? no.

      "You are not entitled."
      since the USA is responsible for the global advancement, maybe we are?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:Only one page of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see, so can I have a gereen card?

      No, but you're welcome to come here anyway.

    19. Re:Only one page of comments by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      If you have a masters I say yes. Otherwise, only if you can convince someone in Alabama to leave. :D

    20. Re:Only one page of comments by See+Attached · · Score: 1

      Learning to be an inventive, adaptive and creative society can take decades. It takes an open society, one might say. Having a challenge and a focus drove us together. USA brought men to the moon and back in the sixties with technology that was infantile by comparison, and with live press coverage. With what we learned in the process, we brought many things to market, good and bad. We also learned the value of natural resources, and being in some level of harmony with nature. Our environmental controls kept junk out of waters, the air and land. When will we adopt international pollution standards? Lets not look to space as a plan-b in case this planet is turned into a waste pool.

      --
      Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
  18. Re:Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You have no idea what you're talking about. All I see here is typical American envy and superiority complex.

  19. Re:fracked by interdomestic terrorist can't do wel by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    I think it's Mxedruli forcefed through Bing Translate...

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  20. Re: Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A Commodore 64 running Contiki and a RR-Replay cartridge with Ethernet.

  21. Good Luck by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the recent successes of the Mars rovers it's hard to remember that conditions in space are a super difficult thing to deal with. It's a huge feat all by itself to land on the moon with a functioning rover at all, as China did... so if this rover falters hopefully they'll learn from it and build another.

    Better still it wakes up again and keeps going for them.

    Good Luck China!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  22. 3 month warranty! by assemblerex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Limited warranty, 90 days.

    1. Re:3 month warranty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, just return it in original packaging for a full replacement.

    2. Re:3 month warranty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You pay for the return shipping of course.

    3. Re:3 month warranty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're going to try to return any celestial body, I think Mars (where's the damn underground water reserves?) and Pluto (planet, my ass!) would be in line ahead of the moon. Then again, I guess that's only because the people expecting cheese up there are all senile or dead.

    4. Re:3 month warranty! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Yea, just return it in original packaging for a full replacement.

      I hope they kept the receipt!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:3 month warranty! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      just like on ebay, getting the thing to you is cheap; but if you have to return it, OH BOY are you in for a shock of a shipping charge.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  23. Brief translation from Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mars doesn't have 2 week long nights without an atmosphere. The Mars rovers get a nice helping of solar power each 24 hr period. If there is a software glitch, you can just fix it the next day. That doesn't work on the Moon.

    Greetings, everyone ! Today is the 42th earth day since I've arrived on the moon. I have several good news and one bad news. Which one do you like to hear first ?

    The first good news is that after the 42 days of endeavor I've travelled more than 100 meters. the scientific equipment that I've brought with me - the radar, the panaromic camera, the x-ray scanner, the infra-red scanner, and so on, - have gathered a lot of useful data.

    The second good news is that at dawn time 2 days ago I communicated directly with Ms. Chang'e 3, who is some 20 meters away from me, using the UHF antenna for the first time, without the aid of the "Shi Fu". Although Ms. Chang'e 3 couldn't reply to my message, but I know she would be extremely happy to receive my "love letter". As this was a private message between me and Ms. Chang'e 3, hope that you guys can give us some privacy ...

    The third good news is Ms. Chang'e 3 already went to bed early morning yesterday, preparing for the arrival of 2nd lunar night.

    Now, the bad news.

    I should have gone to bed this morning, but before I went to bed, the "Shi Fu" discovered some abnormalies within my control mechanism, resulting in part of my body isn't responding to command. Right now the "Shi Fu" are cracking their heads to solve this problem, even to the stage of forgoing their beauty nap. Rumor has it that their eyes look more and more like the ones on rabbits.

    Even though with the intervention of the "Shi Fu", I understand that there is a distinct possibility that I may not survive this lunar night....
     
    ....

    Good night, Earth ! Good night, Earthlings !!

    1. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by LifesABeach · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, when is the next China mission to the Moon?

      I guess cheap knock offs don't work well on the moon either.

    2. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Is it normal in china to write news about a rover as if the rover was writing it?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by aliquis · · Score: 1

      So, when is the next China mission to the Moon?

      I guess cheap knock offs don't work well on the moon either.

      But Japanese ones kick your butt!

    4. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not just China, East Asia as whole loves to anthropomorphosize things. Jesus... have you seen all the x-tans that come out of Japan?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    5. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by taiwanjohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Since this is their first lunar rover, there's no precedent either way. However it is normal for Chinese to speak of themselves in 3rd-pers in some situations. This is due to their emphasis on titles instead of names. For example, a parent might say, "Daddy wants you to brush your teeth," instead of "I want you to..." This general pattern is used whenever there is a title of some sort, such as boss, uncle, doctor, mayor, etc..

      That said, I have no idea whether the GP's translation is authentic. I haven't been following this news in the Chinese press. It's a bit over the top, but I wouldn't put it past them, especially as a tactic to engage children with STEM education. It strikes me as the sort of thing Western broadcasters do at Christmas, showing "Santa's sleigh" on the weather radar.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    6. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      There is a Chang'e 4 mission as a back up of this mission. The Chang'e 4 was originally planned for 2015, but it is possible they may make it happen this year if the Chang'e 3 fails.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    7. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Silly Rabbit should have clicked on TFA... ;-)

      Yes, the GP's translation is authentic.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    8. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it normal in china to write news about a rover as if the rover was writing it?

      No idea, but probes from other places have a peculiar tendency to write about themselves too.

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    9. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crews of Challenger, Columbia and Soyuz 1 and 11 lost their lives in space exploration. At least there's no chance of a fatality in this case.

    10. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing about the moon nazis? Are you sure? Is it in those 4 dots you put there?

    11. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by techybod · · Score: 1

      and the crew of Apollo 1 And all the ground staff in a N1 rocket failure.., the list could go on

      --
      "Friends help you move, Real Friends help you move bodies"
    12. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted elsewhere on the internet. Look at the pictures of the Chinese vehicle. Specifically the wheels, the shape of the spokes was directly taken from Spirit and Opportunity. NASA did the R&D but it was a blatant copy. Number of wheels? The only thing they didnt copy was the suspension, they went with what looks like a cheaper option.

    13. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Now if North Korea could humanize actual humans, then we'd be set.

    14. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      So, when is the next China mission to the Moon?

      I guess cheap knock offs don't work well on the moon either.

      But Japanese ones kick your butt!

      This isn't the 1960's. Japanese tech is the high-priced stuff these days.

    15. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yikes! Humanize Lil Kimmy? C'est impossible.

      It's too bad a young and fit Muhammed Ali couldn't meet Lil Kim in a 15 bout match.

      "In this corner, we have the Korean Dumpling King, Lil Kim. In this corner, we have a rather agitated Ali (Ali makes a face and mouths the words "I'm going to kill you" which Lil Kim misinterprets as "You forgot to wear your panties and bra." )

      After round 1, Lil-Kim is flat on his back out cold, seems Ali hit him with a right blow that could stop a tank.

    16. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Maybe India, China, and Japan could collaborate?

      The naming of this joint mission fills the mind with possiblities; and they could blame the west for it?

    17. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Japanese tech is the high-priced stuff these days.

      Because it kicks butt?

    18. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by neonKow · · Score: 1

      It's pretty normal human behavior for people who work closely with a machine to give it name and personality. Our rovers have twitter accounts. Bomb squads have taken their robot on fishing trips.

    19. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      Japanese tech is the high-priced stuff these days.

      Because it kicks butt?

      Because they don't do cheap junk anymore. That's what China is for, these days.

    20. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by crakbone · · Score: 2

      Evidently you don't know what the Chinese are going to do to the Quality Control Engineer for the project.

    21. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It's not the 90s, either. Now they do expensive junk.

    22. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      The government signed off on the project. I don't see a problem, maybe?

    23. Re:Brief translation from Chinese by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I hear the Chinese Space Agency Department, CSAD, is looking for the Lego's sales rep that sold them the suspension kit.

  24. IT SHOULD BE NOTED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that americans give americans hell like this. for us, it is friendly banter.

  25. Actually it's the 2nd lunar night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do hope they resolve the problem and keep going. It would be such an embarassment to China to have it fail on it's first night out.

    Actually that Jade Rabbit had survived its first lunar night out. This upcoming lunar night is the 2nd.

  26. Might do China good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yutu's failure might help calm the Chinese government's ego for a short while. China's regime scares the hell out of me.

    1. Re:Might do China good. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yutu's failure might help calm the Chinese government's ego for a short while. China's regime scares the hell out of me.

      And the one in the US doesn't?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Might do China good. by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      China's regime doesn't scare me although I feel sad for those who suffer under it. The bad direction my own government is headed in worries me far more. I'm not under China's domain but the idiots in D.C. who are dismantling the Constitution because they're worried about some terrorists are a threat to my future freedom. While it's hardly at Tiananmen Square leve,l I resent every step in that direction. Trading liberty for security is a shitty bargain in my view.

    3. Re:Might do China good. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If you think they are even comparable then you are deluded and need to stop watching so much 'news'.

      Snowden would have been killed, his girl friend put in prison along with his family.
      The news reports the replaced the information would be in prison or dead.

      The US has problem, and we need to fix then, but it's really nothing compared to China,

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. It''s a shame by umask077 · · Score: 2

    Those kids that they had build that will be so disappointed. Might have to go back to building iphones.

    --
    --- Always remember. 99.36% of all statistics are inaccurate.
    1. Re:It''s a shame by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I know it's wrong but I laughed anyway. No mod points so I can't help you with the guys who are too PC to appreciate a tasteless joke.

  28. Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GG NORE

  29. Sensei = Xian Sheng = Teacher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Japanese word "Sensei" was from the Chinese word "Xian Sheng" which carries a meaning of "teacher" today.

    In ancient time where most peasants were illiterates, the honorific title "Xian Sheng" was reserved for those who knew how to read and write.

  30. Re: Figures by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm curious what made in USA piece of electronics you're using to write that comment ...

    How about a Lenovo on its 3rd motherboard?

  31. USA Media sucks by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 0

    I had no idea China landed a rover on the moon. Google for pics and I'm glad to see this, especially another country with a lot of resources doing space exploration.

    The US media sucks and spends all their time talking about Justin Bieber and the NFL player Sherman and such --- enough I mostly avoid the "so called" news --- which largely pumps pop culture crap as news.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    1. Re:USA Media sucks by clovis · · Score: 3, Informative

      What newspaper do you read?

      If by "US media", you are talking only about television, then I have to agree.
      The only time I watch news on TV is when I'm on the treadmill at the gym. I assure you that CNN had noted the Jade Rabbit mission before the launch, during the launch, and after the landing. Nothing in-depth, but what can you say about the mission anyway?

      Here's some links (below) from the Atlanta Journal. I think they did a decent job of reporting on it. It's similar to the coverage in most mainstream newspapers.
      http://www.accessatlanta.com/v...
      http://www.ajc.com/videos/news...
      http://www.ajc.com/ap/ap/inter...
      http://www.ajc.com/ap/ap/top-n...
      http://www.ajc.com/ap/ap/top-n...
      http://www.accessatlanta.com/v...
      http://www.accessatlanta.com/v...
      http://www.ajc.com/videos/news...

    2. Re:USA Media sucks by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      I had no idea China landed a rover on the moon. Google for pics and I'm glad to see this, especially another country with a lot of resources doing space exploration. The US media sucks and spends all their time talking about Justin FUCKING Bieber and the NFL player Sherman and such --- enough I mostly avoid the "so called" news --- which largely pumps pop culture crap as news.

      ftfy ha

      Hope the rover wakes up. Cold up there.

    3. Re:USA Media sucks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, you suck. It's been on CNN, NPR, my local news stations, magazines and blogs.

      You are so bust making assumption, cramming crap into a predetermined narrative, and focusing on the negative you haven't bothered to actually pay attention.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:USA Media sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The news may be okay on those sites, but the "adchoices" stalking is insidious. Don't even think about enabling Javascript.

  32. Re: Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly he's using a MacPro.

  33. Re:fracked by interdomestic terrorist can't do wel by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

    I thought it was Glen Beck's teleprompter.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  34. Welcome to the Internet, Population: Unrestrained by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the internet. Just yesterday, there was an article about Kentucky and most of the initial comments were bigoted nonsense. Blame nationalism if you like, but understand that such comments come from people who are just as likely to denigrate their own countrymen. If you value your sanity, please don't take such behavior personally.

  35. It could have been fixed sooner. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could have been fixed sooner, but they are stuck in phone menu hell trying to get a live person at the call center in Mumbai.

  36. Re: Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No but our USian bosses who outsourced all our manufacturing are getting a piece of the pie on the Chinese made laptop that I am using to type this message,

    History repeats itself into infinity.

    When the Mongols conquered the Chinese, they did not need to lay siege to the wall; they just bribed the Chinese gate keepers. Today in the USA a similar thing is happening. Our leaders have no loyalty to the country they are supposed to be leading. I just hope all the daughter of the USian oligarchs are sold into prostitution in the good old PRC.

    First comes humility, then greatness, then pride, then shame, then humility again. The situation in the USA is very similar to the situation in China in the 18th century. The USA had a good run and thought the world revolved around USA, just like the Chinese thought they were the center of the world back in the bad old days. I wonder if the Chinese will be sending warships over to the USA to force us to buy their opium. Probably not the US is already controlled by the highest bidder (China). The question is will the USA rise from its lunar night or will it fall to sleep for the next 1000 years or so.

    Might always makes right, and the ones that are right are the ones that have the best economy. All wars are economic wars, and the ones that win the wars are the ones with the best economy. During WWII the USians didn't outfight the Germans, they outproduced the Germans. Yes the war was largely one by the women making all the bullets and bombers back on the mainland. Read Audi Murphy's (WWII most highly decorated USian soldier) autobiography if you don't believe me. The USA is going to get its ass kicked if we don't get our act together.

  37. All Shi-Fu were lef by johnsonlam · · Score: 1

    Who still trying to trust China is a moron. Anything China is neither bought or stole from somewhere else.

    --
    Hong Kong - International Joke Center (after 1997-06-30)
  38. The song? by ignavus · · Score: 1

    Didn't Audrey Hepburn in "Breakfast at Tiffany's" sing a song called "Moon Rover"?

    That's the first thought I had when I saw this topic.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  39. I don't because he's a fucking moron by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean let's see what's in the thread right now: An energizer bunny joke about the US mars rovers, someone saying good luck to the Chinese and how this transcends politics, someone saying Jade Rabbit is awesome, someone who hopes they resolve the problem, someone correcting the use of shi-fu, and then this.

    So basically, he's making shit up. The higher rated comments are nearly all encouragement, and the one referencing the US rovers is a joke. This moron wants there to be a bunch of US nationalism for him to hate on, but there's not, so he just pretends like there is anyhow. He's making up reasons for US hate/China strong.

    Also there's the stupid crap of trying to make the US look bad because "Your country is the biggest melting pot of foreign scientists and researchers in the world." As though the US is so stupid and has to import foreigners to do any work. No, quite the opposite actually: American universities are still some of the very best research institutions in the world, despite all the cuts and problems, and people come from around the world to work at them and do research. The US is a melting pot precisely because of the excellence of its research institutions, and in allowing people from all over to come, it helps to continue that excellence and enrich the world's knowledge.

    The grandparent is just a jackass. He really wants this to be some kind of China hate thread so he can hate on that to try and deflect things from the rover's problem. Instead it is a thread largely of people saying "Good luck China, we hope you fix the problem and your rover continues to work."

    1. Re:I don't because he's a fucking moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and people come from around the world to work at them and do research.

      Which in turn makes these institutions excellent in the first place. This is a self-enforcing system.

      I agree with you on the OP in principle, but the question remains how long american research institutions would continue to be excellent without the constant influx of the best talent from around the world. Americans aren't inherently smarter than the rest of the planet.

    2. Re:I don't because he's a fucking moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean let's see what's in the thread right now: An energizer bunny joke about the US mars rovers, someone saying good luck to the Chinese and how this transcends politics, someone saying Jade Rabbit is awesome, someone who hopes they resolve the problem, someone correcting the use of shi-fu, and then this.

      I don't know what your reading settings are, but I had to scroll half way down the page to get out of the "cheap Chinese crap" "welcome to 1970" and "silly Asians anthropomorphize everything" threads. Yeah, someone is in there upmodding the "good luck, guys" and "hooray for the human race" comments, but the mass of high-scoring China-bashing comments is pretty disheartening.

    3. Re:I don't because he's a fucking moron by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you noticed, but the timestamps of the two posts you are replying to are about 3 hours ahead of your post. A lot of moderation can happen in that amount of time, which can change the tone of the entire thread quite a bit.

  40. Many of you feel bad for this rover by Beeftopia · · Score: 1
  41. Lasted longer than than appliences I buy nowadays by austinhook · · Score: 2

    Lasted longer than than the US brand name appliances I buy nowadays...

  42. Best wishes Jade Rabbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope your masters get you back to work again.

  43. Re:fracked by interdomestic terrorist can't do wel by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    almost, I checked - it's Peter Lilley's secretary's notes on climate change

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  44. Re:Enough with the ad hominem crap by ihtoit · · Score: 2

    I don't usually respond to ACs, but you take the biscuit of one who completely fucking misses the point of the parent post.

    I didn't mention anything about manifest destiny, you did. What I was alluding to was the fact that the similarities between Lunar samples and Terran samples was essentially the same, implying that they originated from the same place.

    To piss all over your claim, there is no trace of heavy elements in the Sun - the heaviest element so far detected in the solar spectrum has been oxygen, the most abundant non-hydrogen/helium element being carbon. Elements heavier than iron are found nowhere else but supernova remnants and in the rock of nth generation planetary systems. During the accretion process, heavier elements are drawn towards the centre of the system to form rocky planets, lighter elements either into the star itself or to the outer regions forming gas giants and smaller ice bodies. Ergo, the distribution of proportion of elements throughout the Universe is ANYTHING BUT uniform.

    But of course you knew all that, didn't you, because you're a smart fucker, aren't you.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  45. You can still get them "new" by dbIII · · Score: 0

    I sent a friend's N900 off for repair last year and an unused one came back along with the faulty one which they hadn't bothered to repair.

  46. Posted on wrong article by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Sorry guys. Need coffee or sleep.

  47. Our "nationalism" is not racial or tribal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and already this USA #1-bullshit. Your country is the biggest melting pot of foreign scientists and researchers in the world ...

    Our greatness is in our ideas, our willingness to try new things. We are not held back by centuries/millennia of tradition. We are not deluded by the idea of a racial superiority, a tribal superiority. Unlike many other nations our "nationalism" is not racial or tribal, rather its is founded on ideas.

    ... and there is nothing made in the USA today which does not build upon and directly involve talent from all over the world ...

    Same is true for other countries and true to an even higher degree with respect to China. Well that is if you are referring to invented or discovered as opposed to merely manufactured.

    ... The Chinese have made the whole world proud with this achievement, and you should not let your envy and superiority complex get the better of you.

    What envy? Been there done that. Maybe we envied the USSR lunar rover of many decades ago. As for China, congratulations and all but the feeling is more of a welcome to the neighborhood.

  48. Native peoples of the New World rallying together by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmm, we have a sort of precedent for that. Did the native peoples of the New World put aside their petty differences, rally together and be on the same side for once when the Europeans came over or did they split apart, some siding with them, some siding against them, some forming temporary alliances for quick gain, some shifting with the wind depending on which side was winning, fighting each other etc? Same for the native peoples of Africa.

  49. Daisy, Daisy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's hope they fix it!

  50. Re:Enough with the ad hominem crap by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Of course there are traces of heavy elements in the Sun, it was formed from the same nebula as the Earth which had been enriched by supernovas. Wiki says that 1.69% (5,600 times the Earths mass) of the Sun is heavier elements including 0.2% iron. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  51. Re:Enough with the ad hominem crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To piss all over your claim, there is no trace of heavy elements in the Sun - the heaviest element so far detected in the solar spectrum has been oxygen, the most abundant non-hydrogen/helium element being carbon.

    This is simply wrong. A great number of elements have been detected in the Solar spectrum. The iron lines are among the most prominent. Look up Fraunhofer lines.

  52. Re:Native peoples of the New World rallying togeth by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Human invaders. The comparison with non-human invaders to me, isn't valid. Of course this would work if the alien invaders were like in Star Trek e.g. humans with a specific planet-wide invariant culture and funny noses. :D

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  53. Made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup

  54. It's all about nationalist crap by bstoneaz · · Score: 1

    The Jade Rabbit is an awesome piece of scientific equipment, and it's on the moon. Let's hope if makes it through the night and continues to send data that will benefit all of humanity.

    You should not separate the tech from it's intentions. This rover wasn't sent up for the sake of tech, it was sent up because this is a step towards China's own national presence off planet.

  55. more nukes now by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No new plutonium is allowed to be manufactured

    I hope this ends soon. Robert Oppenheimer and others proposed a central global authority to control the world's plutonium. Since we know we only have so much left, each interested country could take part in a new organization that starts from scratch with no historical precedents hanging over it and use the plutonium only for space exploration.

    Each country could & would want to contribute because everyone wants to get back into space & nuclear power helps alot.

    In general I think nuclear power's time has come. You can list all the dangers but we have the same vulnerability with anything. Just look at the recent rail cars carrying oil products that crashed and burned in Canada almost destroying a whole town & killing 30+ people.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:more nukes now by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The problem is cost. Governments are increasingly unwilling to fund nuclear and it isn't economically viable without heavy subsidy. For example in the UK the government has to provide insurance since no commercial insurer would even consider it, and guarantee very high wholesale prices for the electricity generated.

      There are too many competitive alternatives now. The only reason we are having more nuclear is because it makes friends of the politicians in power richer and helps meet our environmental targets, and because the extremely powerful newspapers hate all the alternatives. Logically it makes little sense.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:more nukes now by Code+Yanker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem is cost.

      The problem is IMPOSED cost. We IMPOSE cost on nuclear because, despite it's amazing track record of safety normalized for Terawatt-hours produced, the one accident where fewer than 70 people actually died from the radiation (despite the fact that its primary purpose was for enriching weapons grade nuclear material, not energy and had third-world safety controls) was heavily publicized. 70 people fall of their roofs in different parts of the world for a trickle of solar power and it is as "statistic." 70 people die from radiation for the oceans of energy nuclear has produced, and it is a "disaster."

      in the UK the government has to provide insurance since no commercial insurer would even consider it.

      Insurance companies profit by dispersing the risk of low-frequency-high-cost events over multiple parties. For any given event, the frequency multiplied by the cost of the event must be less than the premium. Nuclear meets this requirement! But there is a second requirement called "ruin capacity" that derives from a statistical nicety in the central limit theorem: The cost of a single event must be much lower than the operating cost of the risk-aggregating party, so that the off-chance of a single event wouldn't put the company at risk of going out of business.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      This is not true for any single insurer in the UK, but it is true for the government. Thus, an insurer could not profit from a nuclear power plant, but the government could.

      There are too many competitive alternatives now.

      There are no alternatives that are as safe and reliable as nuclear power. Fossil fuels? Not nearly as safe as nuclear. Hydro? Not nearly as safe as nuclear. Wind/Solar? Not reliable enough to generate base load electricity without energy storage. Energy storage? Not even close to becoming economically viable yet. Germany is the closest any major power has come to ditching fossil fuels for renewables, with a whopping 25% reduction in fossil fuel dependency.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

      But renewables can't produce energy on-demand without expensive energy storage mechanisms. So Germany can't actually CONSUME that energy without the help of rate agreements from their nuclear-producing neighbors like France.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

      France, by contrast, ditched fossil fuels for a primarily nuclear-based strategy a long time ago. The result? 90+% reduction in fossil fuel usage.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

      By all measures, nuclear is winning.

      because the extremely powerful newspapers hate all the alternatives.

      [Citation needed]

    3. Re:more nukes now by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The problem is IMPOSED cost. We IMPOSE cost on nuclear because, despite it's amazing track record of safety normalized for Terawatt-hours produced

      That's now how insurance works. They look at the potential risk, and as Fukushima demonstrated that potential (in monetary terms) is rather high. Sorry, but if you irradiate someone's property and make it worthless, or destroy their business and livelihood, you have to compensate them. That's not an imposed cost, that's how society works. You can't externalize the cost of an accident by saying "too bad".

      Ruin theory doesn't really apply here. It is based on the potential for a large number of accidents to cause huge financial losses, where as with nuclear a single accident could easily bankrupt even the largest insurers.

      Thus, an insurer could not profit from a nuclear power plant, but the government could.

      Only if the premiums made the energy produced ridiculously expensive. Keep in mind that the UK has already had to guarantee above market rate prices.

      As for all your other stuff about renewables, you make the classic mistake of considering a single type or single generator on its own. Sure, a particular wind farm may not produce the same amount of energy all year round, but over the entire country there is always a base load of wind energy. Storage systems are already viable, such as the 50MW batteries they have deployed in Japan, and are of course improving rapidly. Yes, there are challenges, but we are meeting them and developing a lot of cool new tech along the way, rather than just trying to build the same old stuff we build 40 years ago.

      Germany isn't even half way through it's transitional period yet, and has already made incredible progress. Far beyond what the nay-sayers said was possible when they started. Look at it another way, there is plenty of money being invested in new renewable energy sources, but very little in nuclear. Investors only care about their returns, so that should tell you something.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:more nukes now by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Only nuclear power has to pay for the damage and deaths it causes. Coal companies are free to irradiate huge swaths of land and statistically increase deaths far beyond nuclear with their pollution, without any compensation or insurance.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    5. Re:more nukes now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > same vulnerability with anything

      Compare any accident with fossil fuel to Chernobyl and Fukushima. Hint: long term effect.

    6. Re:more nukes now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear power has been along long enough to gauge risk over time accurately. Hence; "safety normalized for Terawatt-hours produced".

      Sorry, but if you irradiate someone's property and make it worthless, or destroy their business and livelihood, you have to compensate them. That's not an imposed cost, that's how society works.

      Why aren't you railing against coal, natural gas, hydroelectric, fracking then; all of which do this, constantly, to a much greater degree (averaged out) than nuclear power does?

      Furthermore, while Fukushima was a huge disaster, it is not unique to other industrial disasters throughout history. Using your logic would imply that none of those industries are viable, which, of course, is not true.

      Another thing is that most of the damage people associate with Fukushima is actually due to this giant earthquake and tsunami that you might have heard about.

      As for all your other stuff about renewables, you make the classic mistake of considering a single type or single generator on its own.

      And you are making the classic mistake of assuming that there's no progress or research going on anywhere else than wind/solar & power storage. There is still tons of progress in Nuclear, new power plants are not the same as the "old stuff we build 40 years ago".

      Investors only care about their returns, so that should tell you something.

      Investing is very speculative and prone to bubbles and crashes. There have been quite a few solar companies to crash, and furthermore many are not profiting yet, high chance that there will be more crashes coming...

      (Not that I'm against research into solar/wind and power storage. Just saying that arguments against nuclear sound like scaremongering and are not based in reality).

    7. Re:more nukes now by Code+Yanker · · Score: 1

      That's now how insurance works. They look at the potential risk, and as Fukushima demonstrated that potential (in monetary terms) is rather high. Sorry, but if you irradiate someone's property and make it worthless, or destroy their business and livelihood, you have to compensate them.

      The cost of compensating them multiplied by the frequency of such an occurrence would be FAR, FAR, FAR, less than the rate. The cost of occurrence is high, but the frequency of the occurrence is more than low enough to compensate. Ruin theory is THE ONLY THING AT PLAY HERE. I also want to point out that Fukushima was caused by a natural disaster that ALREADY MADE A SHITLOAD OF PROPERTY WORTHLESS.

      That's not an imposed cost, that's how society works.

      The fact that we require nuclear to be so much more profitable to society (AND IT IS) demonstrates that IS an imposed cost.

      Only if the premiums made the energy produced ridiculously expensive.

      Look up the number of Terawatts produced by nuclear reactors built in the last 30 years. Then look at the damage to life and property caused by nuclear reactors built in the last 30 years. Report your findings. This study has been done a thousand times and your just flat out wrong.

      Keep in mind that the UK has already had to guarantee above market rate prices.

      Only if "above market" means greater than the price of fossil fuels MINUS the externalized cost of their damages to human health and the environment.

      As for all your other stuff about renewables, you make the classic mistake of considering a single type or single generator on its own. Sure, a particular wind farm may not produce the same amount of energy all year round, but over the entire country there is always a base load of wind energy.

      Show me one fucking example of a geographical region that has achieved this. The mythical "composite base load" is just that. A myth. Even in theory, it requires natural gas to provide feedback-based stabilization (meaning you need a smart grid in the first place). The end game for such schemes is that we invest a shitload of money in the short-term on a precisely calculated ratio of wind to solar and sparse energy storage with gas-powered stabilization, and invest a shitload of money in the long-term on dense energy storage. Either way, it is not even close to economical.

      Storage systems are already viable, such as the 50MW batteries they have deployed in Japan

      with fewer government subsidies than nuclear AT PRESENT TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, of course

      Germany isn't even half way through it's transitional period yet, and has already made incredible progress.

      France is still innovating too. And they are WAY farther along. I'd say they are pretty much DONE with their transition already!

      there is plenty of money being invested in new renewable energy sources, but very little in nuclear

      Ruin theory. It's a thing.

    8. Re:more nukes now by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The cost of compensating them multiplied by the frequency of such an occurrence would be FAR, FAR, FAR, less than the rate.

      Do you have any idea how much Fukushima is likely to cost to clean up? Based on the lifetime profit projections for the new plant being built in the UK it would require every penny from about 130 plants to cover. Fukushima isn't even the worst possibly failure mode, not by a long shot.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:more nukes now by Code+Yanker · · Score: 1

      So lets see, you are

      1.) using a profit projection (likely to ALREADY include government-mandated insurance premiums, but you didn't cite a source so who knows?)
      2.) from a reactor built to modern safety standards
      3.) to meet modern regulations (which can make costs arbitrarily high)
      4.) to compare with a reactor commissioned in the 1970s
      5.) using a design from the 1960s.

      Sounds legit.

    10. Re:more nukes now by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      1) Yes, it includes a pathetic £140m of insurance, only enough to cover small accidents.
      2) All reactors are up to modern safety standards in the UK, otherwise they can't be operated.
      3) Evidence suggests that they are not always high enough, especially considering the risk to the government insurance scheme.
      4) Modern reactors are better but not by enough to change the dynamic.
      5) Also no-one wants to build really new designs because when you are investing tens of billions of pounds tried and tested beats new and unknown reliability every time. Also, our 1960s design reactors turned out to be crap and we build imported designs now.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:more nukes now by Code+Yanker · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the UK, but here in the States, the safety standards for new reactors are much higher than for existing reactors. Paradoxically, this has the opposite effect on public safety because now there are no economical options to take the place of an aging reactor. Normalizing for externalities, nuclear would still be profitable to the public, but NIMBY means we won't be getting any new reactors for a long time. It won't last though. At current rate of growth in energy consumption, soon we won't have a choice.

  56. You are the moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first comment was a rah-rah america #1. The comment you cite about support came much later.

  57. Well, not on Mars, anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really worth gloating when you "face planted" your mars probe due to incompetence, is it.

  58. The difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that the Chinese see everything through the eyes of 'how can we exploit this for further gain'. Read about WHY they want to go: military control and stripping anything and everything of minerals. They have picked up on the core evil of capitalism and will out evil all.

    captcha: pollutes

    1. Re:The difference by asylumx · · Score: 2

      the Chinese see everything through the eyes of 'how can we exploit this for further gain'

      I know an awful lot of Americans who see everything through those same eyes.

  59. Dark side of the moon? by gomiam · · Score: 1

    It seems the writer of the article hasn't learned there are no "dark sides" to the Moon.

    1. Re:Dark side of the moon? by coyote_oww · · Score: 1

      I take "Dark side of the moon" to be a colloquialism about the side of the moon facing away from the Earth, rather than literally being dark. It is used all the time in artistic works with exactly that meaning. I guess Sheldon Cooper would disagree vehemently, but everyone else knows what it means.

  60. 50 years ... so whats a few more to achieve it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been there done that.

    No doubt when it fails we wont hear any more mention of it ever again and then there will be the next one rushed to do the same thing about a year from now as if it was their first attempt. Even with technologies matured after 50 years taken to make this thing - its not a great showing for their propaganda (lets see the subject get blocked on their internet filters sometime soon).

  61. Oblig by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    - Shiong mao niao
    Panda piss.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  62. Re: Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took 3 Chinese made keyboards to type that sente@#$@$@#$

    It took 4 Chinese made keyboards to type that sentence out.

  63. A question of solar panels by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    Why do they not have fixed, upward facing panels on the thing, at least a minimum number needed to boot the bastard and deploy it's other panels?

    Direct sunlight, no atmosphere the sheer bulk of power slamming every surface of this thing during the daylight hours ought to be enough to reboot it.

    KISS- Keep It Simple, Stupid. The very basis of any engineering project. If it lives and dies by solar power, then a complex aim-and-stowaway solar array that a single glitch will kill the whole rover is opposite of the smart way to go. maybe add that to it to boost power- on top of a simple fixed array system that is sufficient to operate basic systems.
    Hell, I'd put a couple on the bottom that are enough to operate the main computer and an articulation arm strong enough to flip it back over...

  64. A difference of composition by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    The moon as a captured asteroid/space debris will be a much lower concentration of heavy substances, based on it's rocky composition.

    the moon as an impact artifact- broken off from the Earth- means a much higher composition of heavy elements that we need. No one needs more rocks- everyone needs more metals.

    I may be wrong, but I believe this means more water in the crystal structure as well if formed from Earth.

  65. Agreed. by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    People rag on China, and talk about their great American, Japanese, or Korean made whatchamacallit- completely ignoring the fact that every single piece of it was made in China.

    Many Chinese knockoffs are not knockoffs.

    let's say a factory makes Widgets, and these are popular items. they are commissioned to make 1000 Widgets per day.
    Well, that factory rolls off 1100 Widgets, sends the 1000 to fulfil the order, then sells the additional 100 on the black market. The difference between the prime Widget and the knockoff Widget: price. nothing more.

    Yes, there are cheap knockoffs. These are pretty easy to spot- they usually are not a valid option - like a Ferrari with a Yugo engine option....
    I saw Beats headphones galore when I was overseas. I bought a couple of pairs at $25 (Solo HD) a piece and took them to a beats freak I knew. I knew they were "fakes" but did not tell him, and asked him to authenticate them as the seller seemed "fishy". He could not tell the difference, and eventually pronounced them genuine. I suspect, aside from a serial number check, the Beats folks themselves could not tell. Pretty damn good $25 headphones. I used one pair and gave the others to my son. No way I'd pay $300 for em... but I'd pay $25 for em any day.
    I have had them for 2 years. They still sound and look as good as the day I bought them.

    1. Re:Agreed. by See+Attached · · Score: 1

      Capitalism - sell something for as much as someone is willing to pay. Good for consumerism, bad for healthcare.

      --
      Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
  66. They don't have to: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American companies will give/sell them the same designs they have made. By the way, are there any "ameri8can" companies there? Rethink your inane...

  67. Re:Enough with the ad hominem crap by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Thanks. That must be why there's a word for that : star metallicity.

  68. is this plan B in case.... by See+Attached · · Score: 1

    I just hope that this Moon/Mars thing isn't plan B in case their environmental policies destroy this planet. Hard to imagine being a human ... and flourishing in the confines of space. Kirk had a nack for finding places with breathable atmospheres, and hot space nymphs, but thats Hollywood. Flexing might and muscle without concern for anyone else is not recipe FTW.

    --
    Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
  69. Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the funny thing about those Engrish jokes is that while we're are laughing at poorly translated packaging and signs, they are laughing at all the western idiots with Chinese tattoos with equally poor translations. At least they can update their signs...

  70. Made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "designed to operate for three months" - is it some sort of Chinese standard?