Pirate Bay Block Lifted In the Netherlands

swinferno writes "The Dutch ISPs Ziggo and XS4all are no longer required to block access to the websites of The Pirate Bay. [Original in Dutch; here's Google's translation.] This has been decided by the court in The Hague. The blockade has proven to be ineffective. The Dutch anti-piracy organization BREIN will have to reimburse legal costs of €326,000. The internet provider XS4ALL has already started lifting the ban. The website of The Pirate Bay was ordered to be blocked by the two major ISPs in January 2012. Recent studies by Amsterdam University and CentERdata showed that this did not reduce the number of downloads from illegal sources. Many people circumvented the blockade."

Comments

Recent studies

[Thanshin]

Recent studies by Amsterdam University and CentERdata.showed that this did not reduce the number of downloads from illegal sources.

It must be sad to make studies about the obvious.

You go have a beer with friends and they ask you "hey! What are you studying now?"

"I''ve proven that blocking thepiratebay doesn't reduce the number of illegal downloads", you say low voice while fiddling with the peanuts.

And then they look at you as if you were retarded.

Re:Recent studies

[SecurityTheatre]

On the other hand, I commend lawmakers and Judges for looking at the data and making a rational decision.

In many places, the politicians enter the discussion with an idea of how things work. Most of the time, they simply refuse to change their mind, damn the evidence.

I tip my hat to the Dutch judges or politicians who reserve judgement, wait for a peer-reviewed or statistically rigorous assessment from an independent body, and then make a reasonable decision from that.

Just because YOU feel it is obvious, obviously many people don't. Good data is the most appropriate counter to ignorant assumptions.

Re:Recent studies

[Kjella]

Well, if you're being paid good money for stating the obvious you should have a pretty steady job. There's worse things to do for a living...

Re:Recent studies

[telchine]

I tip my hat to the Dutch judges or politicians who reserve judgement

Judges that reserve judgement? That's just ridiculous, not to mention selfish!

If I were a judge I'd hand out judgement freely to anyone who asked for it. Hell, even some who didn't! I'd be dedicated to my job!

Re:Recent studies

[thaylin]

How do you steal something that does not physically exist?

Re:Recent studies

[Sique]

Actually, it can be quite revealing to make studies about the obvious. Obvious means that we can easily come up with a good narrative about what we see and what we should expect, but that narrative does not necessarily connect somehow to what really happens. The often cited example is that of Newton's apple, where it is obvious that it's the Earth pulling down the apple, but it's not what really happens.

So yes: Study the obvious thoroughly, and you pretty soon lose any idea about "obviousness".

Re:Recent studies

[Opportunist]

You mean like hijacking a common folk tale and copyrighting it forever?

I think it's sad that a study about this is really necessary.

Re:Recent studies

[Bengie]

They use the Men in Black Memory Eraser after copying your ideas and destroy all back-ups and copies.

Re:Recent studies

[hawguy]

It must be sad to make studies about the obvious.

That people feel they are entitled to steal someone else's work and not compensate that person (or group)? Yes, it is sad that a study needs to state the obvious

Or that when presented with a paid option that is less convenient and more restricted than the free option, they'll take the free option. If there were a legitimate and reasonably priced download service for non-DRM protected movies, then there would be less incentive to pirate movies, and the industry would have a leg to stand on when they whine that downloaders are ruining their business.

I usually buy used disks from amazon and rip them, while if I wanted to, I could download a movie torrent in a few hours -- not everyone is willing to place an order, wait a week for the disk to arrive and then rip it when they could just download it for free. Why pay more for less?

Re:Recent studies

[c]

And then they look at you as if you were retarded.

... and yet, it's far better than saying "I've been thinking of going into politics".

Re:Recent studies

[Anonymous Coward]

Here in the UK, the pirate bay is largely blocked. of couse there are ways around it, but they are technical.

Virtually every casual pirate of years past that i knew, if you ask them now, has no idea how to download the latest release movies off the web now that TPB is effectively blocked in the UK.

Anecdotally, anyway, it would seem that the block is effective. not 100% effective, but somewhat effective. my 'sample' includes people in their 20s and 30s who are otherwise technically savvy. They also dont particularly know where to get the latest mp3s any more.

I dont know what the Netherlands study did or did not do. I also dont know what the dutch exact policy is. But I will tell you this: i'd be very very skeptical of any study which would claim to show that the recent bans in the UK have not reduced the rate of piracy. Unlike you, however, I won't be presumptuous.

Re:Recent studies

[Shalaska]

Exactly, in most cases piracy is a indication of a service problem. It is amazing the number of times I have and have seen others have to pirate a game I already own, just because the DRM-copy fails to function as advertised due to draconian DRM restrictions. Furthermore the pirated copy doesn't require things such as disks in the CD drive which I would rather not have to look for. On the other hand all of the games I have gotten off of Steam, although using Steam's DRM system, I have not had to pirate because their system just works for me.

Whenever a pirated copy is better then the legal copy, there is something wrong with the legal copy.

Re:Recent studies

[xevioso]

This, I always thought, was always rather a silly and pithy quote from Jesus. As Christian theology makes clear, you will be judged regardless of if you do or do not judge. So maybe it makes sense to judge on occasion, just for the hell of it.

For example, I'm relatively certain that at the end of days, Harry Connick, Jr. and Jennifer Lopez will be judged for their talents of lack thereof, regardless of the fact that they were judges on American Idol.

Re:Recent studies

[JWSmythe]

I think anyone who's gamed for very long has used the "no-cd" or other "pirate" hacks to fix annoyances. That or they've "pirated" a game because their cd/dvd was scratched so they couldn't reinstall it.

I say "they" because I'd never do any such thing. :)

Re:Recent studies

[radarskiy]

It must be sad to hate science.

Re:Recent studies

[Anonymous Coward]

Anecdotally, anyway, it would seem that the block is effective. not 100% effective, but somewhat effective.

I don't know ... Just moved to the UK a couple of weeks ago. A quick google search for how to access the site in the UK had me up and running pretty dang quickly. I'd say 7 minutes to find a workaround is not very effective.

Re:Recent studies

[nbauman]

One judge says to another: "Be just. And if you can't be just, be arbitrary."

Re:Recent studies

[CCarrot]

Actually, it can be quite revealing to make studies about the obvious. Obvious means that we can easily come up with a good narrative about what we see and what we should expect, but that narrative does not necessarily connect somehow to what really happens. The often cited example is that of Newton's apple, where it is obvious that it's the Earth pulling down the apple, but it's not what really happens.

So yes: Study the obvious thoroughly, and you pretty soon lose any idea about "obviousness".

Also, fun fact, say the word "obvious" enough times and it starts to lose all sense of meaning, it just turns into a bunch of sounds...actually, that works with pretty much any word. Works better with multi-syllable words, though :)

Re:Recent studies

[Mister Liberty]

I bet most of your friends are of the Facebook kind.
Cluelesser impossible.

Re:Recent studies

[mcgrew]

That people feel they are entitled to steal someone else's work and not compensate that person (or group)?

Steal? Sorry, you just outed yourself as an MPAA shill or a moron (or as the moderation says, a troll). If you're raped, do you scream murder? Let me educate you on the difference between copyright infringement and stealing.

Copyright infringement: you upload an MPAA movie tracker to a tracker service. Note that downloading it is neither illegal nor immoral. Upload that movie and if you're caught, it will cost you thousands of dollars. Nobody has lost anything; the copyright holder still has his copyright. Nothing was lost. And in fact, if it's an indie title without shitloads of marketing, piracy can MAKE money for the artists.

Stealing: You shoplift a DVD from WalMart. WalMart is out the cost of that DVD you stole. If you're caught, it's a misdemeanor and a few hundred dollar fine.

BTW, note my sig. I encourage you to pirate my book. It's free marketing, nobody's going to buy a book they've never heard of by an author they've never read.

Re:Recent studies

[mcgrew]

This, I always thought, was always rather a silly and pithy quote from Jesus. As Christian theology makes clear, you will be judged regardless of if you do or do not judge.

Christian theology doesn't teach that you are judged for your sins. It teaches that you're judged on your good works, your sins have already been paid for in blood. The more good you do on Earth, the more your reward will be in heaven. "And he looked up, and saw the rich men casting their gifts into the treasury. And he saw also a certain poor widow casting in thither two mites. And he said, Of a truth I say unto you, that this poor widow hath cast in more than they all:
For all these have of their abundance cast in unto the offerings of God: but she of her penury hath cast in all the living that she had."

This is the real meaning of the parable of the talents. Just going to church doesn't cut it. If that's all you do for God you've buried your talent, while the guy feeding the poor in Africa has the ten talents.

Re:Recent studies

[mwvdlee]

It's completely obvious the earth is flat.
No need to study that at all.
It'll only make you look like a retard to your beer-buddies.

Study is necessary because there's always a slight chance that the obvious isn't actually the truth.

Re:Recent studies

[mwvdlee]

Why did you just do that?
The MIB movies won't be as much fun without the Memory Eraser, now that you've pirated it for your comment.

Re:Recent studies

[smooth wombat]

If there were a legitimate and reasonably priced download service

Bullshit. As various people and groups have shown, they have provided very easy methods to get their work at extremely cheap prices and people still go out and steal the work.

You can use iTunes if you want. 99 cents for a song and people still complain. Or, if you prefer, RadioHead said they will allow people to download their song (album?) but would appreciate a "donation" for the song. The amount of money they received didn't even cover the cost of the electricity.

People can use semantics or whatever excuse they choose to explain why they're stealing someone's work without compensating that person, but in the end, they're just that, an excuse. The more you continue to steal someone's work, the more justification you give to them to make it more restrictive.

Re:Recent studies

[hawguy]

If there were a legitimate and reasonably priced download service

Bullshit. As various people and groups have shown, they have provided very easy methods to get their work at extremely cheap prices and people still go out and steal the work.

You can use iTunes if you want. 99 cents for a song and people still complain. Or, if you prefer, RadioHead said they will allow people to download their song (album?) but would appreciate a "donation" for the song. The amount of money they received didn't even cover the cost of the electricity.

People can use semantics or whatever excuse they choose to explain why they're stealing someone's work without compensating that person, but in the end, they're just that, an excuse. The more you continue to steal someone's work, the more justification you give to them to make it more restrictive.

Perhaps $.99 per song is not a "reasonable price" to someone that many have thousands of songs on their device.

Radiohead must pay more for electricity than most bands if $6M doesn't cover their electricity cost:

http://entrepreneur.pro/articl...

The donation-based model is effective for established bands because they already have a mass following and there will always be a fan who would be willing to pay for their music. The question is what would one pay for an album that they want if given a chance to get it for free. There lies the answer to what an album should be sold for. Traditionally it has been sold for $9.99 as a paid download or $14.99 at a retail store. The Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails fans who opted to pay on average were willing to give about $4 to download the album. That is a far cry from the traditional pricing model which dictates that an album is priced between $9.99 and $14.99. Record labels watch out because this is an indication that the pricing on albums is not in unison with market demand and what a music fan perceives as the true value of an album.

According to the NIN band, 800,000 transactions generated $1.6 million in sales revenue in the first week of the "Ghosts I-IV" album's availability, despite the fact that the 36-song version of the album is widely available on torrent sites and file sharing P2P networks. Radiohead's "In Rainbows" generated approximately $6 million in revenues which went directly to the band, with 1,200,000 downloads.

Re: Recent studies

[Optali]

How exact.y do you "steal" the work? You hijack the musicians and force them to play?

And the lack of donations for free downloads... Isn't it maybe that people didn't like their crap?
Radiohead sucks massive balls anyway.

And why in hell's name do they want a donation for it? Do they not get enough money for gigs and from royalties from spotify rdio? What did they expect, getting rich from donations ?
In the days of crowdfunding this sounds rather than what I already said: that their album sucked so much dick that not even the more hardcore fans wanted it.

And in fact you are wrong: services like RDio have reduced music download... As they are conveniently priced and you can save a lot of space on your drives. Why would I download an album of (say) Sadistik Exekution when I have the whole discography online and it takes me less to start it on the browser than to start up iTunes?

Summing up: Radiohead sucks!

Re:Recent studies

[bzipitidoo]

Maybe you're just trolling, but I'll bite. Why can't you accept that copying is NOT stealing? Maybe copying is illegal or immoral, but it's definitely not stealing. We do have a few crimes on the books other than theft, crimes like vandalism, speeding, reckless driving, libel and slander, assault and battery, trespassing, and littering. I view copying as a sort of anti-vandalism. Vandalism destroys property for no gain to the destroyer, rather than stealing property for gain. Copying is the opposite. It creates something without depriving the source of any information. But you want to hammer away, and view copying as a form of theft no matter what.

And who said anything about not compensating someone for their work? Control of copying is not the only way to compensate artists. Monoply control is certainly a bad way to go about it. What's with you people who think that's the only fair way to do it, and who overlook all the waste these attempts at such control has caused? It costs way more to distribute a song via CD than via download. Have you no imagination at all? Just can't believe society can function and produce art and science, without copyright, and despite all the evidence around you demonstrating otherwise?

You speak of giving them justification to be more restrictive. You missed the point that being restrictive is not a choice that they have. They can't stop the people from sharing information, not with technology, not with the law, and not with appeals to morality. Nor should they. Indeed, the immorally is on their part for trying to stamp out sharing, and trying to convince people it's bad, not our part for trying to share. Sharing is part of who we are. Might as well try tell us we can't talk or write to each other any more because it's immoral.

Intersting

[Anonymous Coward]

This is a pretty interesting decision.

Regardless of what one thinks about copyright, forcing someone to do something ineffective to prevent it is just a waste of resources. Even if it is effective if the cost is greater than the benefit it could be questionable.
It seems that it would be reasonable that the copyright holder pays the cost to enforce the copyright, otherwise an entitled copyright holder might request that even symbolic measures should be taken at completely unreasonable costs

Re:Intersting

[houstonbofh]

It seems that it would be reasonable that the copyright holder pays the cost to enforce the copyright, otherwise an entitled copyright holder might request that even symbolic measures should be taken at completely unreasonable costs

Now if someone can just do this with spurrious takedown requests. When there is no cost to it, there is no reason to stop.

Re:Intersting

[DickBreath]

In addition to considering whether a measure is effective, it is reasonable to consider whether it is the ISP's job or Google's job or anyone else's job to police copyright infringement.

The ISP's job is to deliver and route packets. Period.

I mentioned Google, simply because the RIAA-holes also believe that it is Google's job to police copyright infringement as well as ISPs job.

What's Pirate Bay?

[RivenAleem]

Is that some sister site to Pirate Proxy?

An unexpected burst of common sense.

[SuricouRaven]

A ruling by Judge Obvious, and his assistant Sarcastic Clerk.

Re:An unexpected burst of common sense.

[Anonymous Coward]

You think that this ruling was common sense? It's very odd to issue a ruling based on whether blocking TPB was effective or ineffective. The only question a judge should ponder is whether the block was justified legally.

Re:An unexpected burst of common sense.

[jxander]

TPB does have some legitimate uses.

If blocking it causes no impact on the illegal uses, while hampering the legal ones... then it is wiser to not block it. Even if there were no legal reasons, blocking TPB costs resources; time and money. Spending those resources for zero gain is a fools errand.

It would be nice if we had a perfect set of rules that could adequately and fairly moderate every possible situation, but we don't. So we appoint people to make judgements on a case-by-case basis. We call them judges, and they've made a wise decision here.

Re:An unexpected burst of common sense.

[Anonymous Coward]

Blocking the pirate bay was a punishment (I don't know who they are punishing for what crime, since it is legal to download in The Netherlands).
Judges should use correct force of punishment for the crime.
Since the punishment is completely ineffective the Judge will need to look for an alternative and effective punishment.

Re:An unexpected burst of common sense.

[AVee]

It's very odd to issue a ruling based on whether blocking TPB was effective or ineffective. The only question a judge should ponder is whether the block was justified legally.

No, no, no. It's not odd at all, it's part of the law (at least in Europe). Article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states:

Any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by this Charter must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others. (emphasis mine)

The judge explicitly cited this in the ruling and stated that the objective of general interest here could only be the reduction of copyright infringement. This objective was not met because the blocking TPB was ineffective. The law was applied, nothing else.

People should start reading the actual judgments before jumping to conclusions about judges, in the ones I've read so far (only dutch ones, YMMV) the judges go a long way explaining how the came to there conclusions and whats the legal basis for this (and proportionality is often part of the equation).

Re:An unexpected burst of common sense.

[stoatwblr]

It's worth noting that these rulings have influence right across the EU.

I would not be surprised if they're cited by UK ISPs to get the blocks there removed.

(UK media has been very quiet on reporting this)

the measurements were indirect.

[nimbius]

By taking a sampling of different pubs in the Netherlands researchers found the increase in phrases like 'Madeas Witness Protection stole 90 minutes of my fucking life' and 'Was ghostrider seriously intended to be that awful?' indicated the blockade may have shortcomings.

its failure was confirmed when sightings of the phrases 'I dont understand why michael bay keeps making Transformer movies' and 'Is Jayden Smith some kind of anagram for helicopter parenting?'

Re:326 euros?

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm from the US and I had no problem reading it. Thanks for contributing to the perception of the dumb American.

Re:326 euros?

[Opportunist]

Well, after perusing the frontpage, I can only say that it's about 50:50, and considering the news I'd have to guess that most research and sane judgements are happening abroad while the US make the headlines for lying national security heads and schools teaching fairy tales as facts.

I dunno if I'd really wanna draw attention to that if I was from the US...

On the down side...

[QuasiSteve]

On the down side...
1. Brein has already put out a bit of newsfluff saying that they're planning to appeal.
2. If this stands, Brein and others will simply put this on the scales to tip in favor of making downloading illegal* - something that the EU says NL should be doing in the first place; NL is one of the few countries where downloading of movies/music/TV series is legal (uploading is illegal, as is downloading of software, etc.) That in turn could lead to a 3-strikes type law (Even though the one in France fails miserably because 1. people avoid getting caught and 2. even when caught, rarely do people actually get cut off.. so it's all bark and no bite.) or direct targeting of downloaders.

* Within the context of 'piracy'. Obviously you're welcome to download the front page of slashdot, or a linux distribution, view whatever you want on YouTube, etc. etc.

Re:On the down side...

[Anonymous Coward]

> * Within the context of 'piracy'. Obviously you're welcome to download the front page of slashdot, or a linux distribution, view whatever you want on YouTube, etc. etc.

No you wouldnt, not after all the effort the spend convincing everyone that downloading anything is illegal.....

Re:On the down side...

[QuasiSteve]

No you wouldnt, not after all the effort the spend convincing everyone that downloading anything is illegal

Despite the widespread hatred against them, Brein, Stichting Thuiskopie and others don't really do the "downloading is illegal!", and their websites actually make fairly clear what the law says can and cannot be done legally.

They can be faulted for many things, but not for any perceived "omg they're trying to make downloading linux illegal!"

Re:On the down side...

[yakumo.unr]

France actually dropped the bans from the 3 strike law in July last year, and only fines remain.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/tech...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
"the government's Constitutional Council on Friday ruled that portion of the much-criticized law to be unconstitutional."

Re:On the down side...

[QuasiSteve]

Yeah, and even those were rarely issued. The law had, and has, no teeth. If tomorrow they made downloading in NL illegal, but all I'd get would be strongly worded e-mails telling me to stop doing it, and I knew full-well that nothing would ever come of it, I'd add a filter to auto-delete those e-mails and continue downloading. Heck, it'd become a sport on several forums to see who could get the most such e-mails.

Re:On the down side...

[mcgrew]

their websites actually make fairly clear what the law says can and cannot be done legally.

Link? Quote? Citation? "You wouldn't download a car" in TV antipiracy commercials pretty much puts the lie to the claim that they're OK with any downloading at all.

And yes, I would download a car. Hell, yes!

Re:On the down side...

[QuasiSteve]

Link? Quote? Citation?

mcgrew! I didn't realize you could read Dutch.
Stichting de Thuiskopie: http://www.thuiskopie.nl/nl/ov... (you'll want the "Downloaden is toch illegaal?" link.

BREIN: http://www.anti-piracy.nl/wat-... (you'll want the second paragraph)

"You wouldn't download a car" in TV antipiracy commercials pretty much puts the lie to the claim that they're OK with any downloading at all.

I think you may have interpreted 'and others' as including RIAA/MPAA/etc. This was within the context of The Netherlands :)

And yes, I too would download a car! Though I wouldn't steal the raw resources required to make that download happen. Of course if those could also be downloaded...

Re:On the down side...

[mcgrew]

No, no Dutch. The only human languages I can speak are English, Spanish, and a smattering of Thai. Someone translated it for me.

Re:326 euros?

[Arker]

They use a comma in the rest of the world too. They just put it in a different place. One hundred thousand and 90/100 is written 100.000,00. Just the opposite of what you are used to. Takes a fraction of a second to get used to.

I second the other poster, knock it off, you are just making Americans look like idiots and as one I am not amused.

Re:Um..

[jones_supa]

Temperature 6 C, light rain. Not that summery in Netherlands right now.

Effective at what?

[Anonymous Coward]

Because the sales and revenues are still tanking.

Either the losses are not due to piracy, the efforts are ineffective, or these losses are nonexistent.

Stupid organisations

[chthon]

Dutch BREIN and Belgium's BAF, two stupid vampyric, leaching organisations, with obnoxious music and an idiot commercial at the beginning of all DVD's sold here in Holland and Belgium.

I find it heartening that BREIN needs to pay the legal costs.

Completely ineffective

[Anonymous Coward]

Finally! The ban was indeed completely ineffective and the block has been removed at at least one other provider as well. There were so many alternatives, I never had any problem finding a different source for a download, barely noticed it if at all, so it certainly made no sense to keep it in place.

I never understood the reason for it in the first place. Downloading is legal in the Netherlands and we even pay an additional charge on any recording media just to help compensate the effects for the industry, so why the ban? Personally, I buy many dvds after watching a torrent of something that I think I might like. Other stuff I download, but never watch. There has been no decrease in the number of movies I go see in the movie theater or that I buy physically. I just don't watch any tv at all.

As has been stated here many times, the calculations copyright owners flaunt when trying so prove how much they have lost in revenue are probably way, way off and they should just move with the times instead of trying to hold on to the past. As has been stated here slightly less often, there is no damage to the economy either. People still spend their money, just in different ways.

Re:Um..

[Anonymous Coward]

Temperature 6 C, light rain. Not that summery in Netherlands right now.

Argh!!!
Don't you know you're supposed to use the temperature scale based on Gabriël Fahrenheit's wife's armpit?1?!1
This is an American-centric website you know. They might throw another hissy fit, just like the one about the numerical format in TFS.

Still 6 C is a bit on the high side; I have it from an authoritative source that in some places the crocuses are already peeking their heads above the ground (poor crocuses).

Re:Um..

[cHALiTO]

Right now? you mean at 16:33 (GMT-3) on 28/01/2014? :P

Re: 326 euros?

[CCarrot]

Really, you think it makes Americans sound stupid when we prefer to use and read the units that are familiar to us? A simple conversion by one editor would mean that thousands of readers wouldn't need to.

Hang on, I'm still busy calculating how many inches are in 5.5 miles...

Perhaps 'teh amurrikan way' is not always the best way?

Re:326 euros?

[Arker]

Hahah good catch.

Yay! ?

[nurb432]

Not sure if this is good or bad in the long run. Its good the order was lifted but it may pave the way for more invasive ways to restrict your access to the net and monitor where you go...

Advice for TPB

[Mister Liberty]

I just read the verdict.
Take down the artwork. You run a real risk there.
Remember Al Capone; wanted for murder, gotten for tax evasion.

Re:Advice for TPB

[mwvdlee]

Which artwork?

Re:326 euros?

[skydyr]

We do. You start at 1 and go on to 2, then 3...

so..what will the future bring?

[psy0rz]

i fear for a future where lobby groups will "convince" governments or agencys like the NSA, to get the download history of all those copyright-"terrorist".

they are already recording all the metadata..its only a really small step from where we are now, to everyone-is-a-criminal.

Re:so..what will the future bring?

[durin]

Everyone is already a criminal. It's just a matter of finding what crime they're guilty of.

Re: 326 euros?

[edittard]

We use the dot for the decimal separator and the comma for digit grouping.

Scientific practice is to use a space, preferably half-width.

Re:Fuck google translation

[swinferno]

Here you go:

http://torrentfreak.com/isps-n...

Re:326 euros?

[dodobh]

326000

362000 Eurobucks in process costs to be paid by br

[Optali]

Nice! And anyway, these guys from BREIN are the most brain-dead that you can find. TPB was blocked but neither it's other URL pirateproxy nor any other torrent site has ever been blocked.
People continued downloading as happily as always. And that's a good example of the way these idiots work: They haven't said shit about any other torrent sire, nor about the extremely popular Usenet channels , they have concentrated exclusively on TBP.

In which way the blocking of one single torrent site can have any influence on online sales completely escapes me... Maybe by means of an exotic variation of the chaos mathematics and quantum electrodynamics.

362000 â to be paid to XS4ALL and Ziggo, nice!