Slashdot Mirror


Why Does Facebook Need To Read My Text Messages?

DavidGilbert99 writes "Facebook updates its Android app quite a lot, but the latest version asks for some rather odd permissions. Rolling out in the UK this week, some users have noticed that it now wants permission to read your text messages. While most suspected Facebook wanted to access the data to try and serve you more targeted ads, Facebook says it is only so it can facilitate two-factor authentication...apparently."

70 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Obvious answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why Does Facebook Need To Read My Text Messages?

    Because shut up, that's why. If you ever want to hear from your "friends" again, you'll do exactly what we say without question. I'm certain you know that either you or your friends are too stupid or lazy to start and follow privately-hosted blogs, so sit down, shut up, and continue giving us data to mine. Idiot.

    1. Re:Obvious answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe Zuckerberg refers to users as 'dumb fucks'

    2. Re:Obvious answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't. I revoke that permission on my phone, as well as full access to call logs, and the app still works just fine. Next task is to figure out what combination of location permissions I can revoke.

  2. Actually one of my beefs by tthomas48 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Android needs to add two levels of permissions for much of this stuff. You basically have to ask for everything or nothing. I wanted to check network state in my current app, which requires asking for permission to change the user's networks. I don't want to change their networks. I just want to see if the network is up.

    1. Re:Actually one of my beefs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is that such granular permissions are too complex for most users to understand. It's not such a good security model. Think about how endless permission messages on Vista lead to people blindly clicking "OK" all the time. Think about how parents were quickly trained by their kids to enter their PIN every time the iPad required it to play some game.

      Permissions are a very hard problem to solve, but I think the Android way of presenting them all up front at a high level does at least make it easy and most importantly very low time/irritation cost for the user to check them. Most people seem to be cottoning on to the fact that flashlight apps don't need network or phone access. Maybe power users could have a box to tick for extended granular permissions, but of course such users can get them via an app because they already have root.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Actually one of my beefs by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...while I agree, the next step is that applications start crashing when you revoke their permissions, or the authors simply refuse to let them run.

      Anyone who writes a program that makes its money by spying on you (while presenting you a game of Hearts), will simply stop dealing the cards when it can't read your text messages. HOSTS blocking already kills ads on a lot of software, but it's an arms race.

      The revenue model is the issue. We want 99 "free" apps.

    3. Re:Actually one of my beefs by tthomas48 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well Android does offer more way more granularity than iOS. I think iOS is nicer in the way it will prompt for a couple of the permissions. That said, iOS can't do many of the things android can, so it's not really an apples to apples comparison.

      Facebook can't read your texts on iOS because it's not possible. My app doesn't require a permission to access network state on iOS because my app can't change it anyway.

      It's easy to do security by simply stopping developers from being able to do things. Of course you just have to trust that Apple is doing all your security properly since there's no way to validate that fact.

    4. Re:Actually one of my beefs by tthomas48 · · Score: 3, Informative

      iOS has solved the problem of security in text messaging apps? In apps that allow innovative network access methods?

      Oh right. They haven't solved it, they just don't allow those apps.

    5. Re:Actually one of my beefs by mlts · · Score: 2

      What I'd like to see is something similar to the old LBE Privacy Guard (which doesn't have a version in English for recent Android releases.) That way, even though an app might ask for everything under the sun, one can turn on functionality that prompts if an app can do something, similar to how iOS and BlackberryOS do things.

      For non-technical users, they can leave that off and either allow/deny apps on install. For more technical users, they can turn off a permission either explicitly (with an exception or error returned), or false data (so a GPS request ends up winding up in the same place such as USENET Central Administration's address.)

      I like having functionality similar to the Cydia app, PMP (Protect My Privacy). That way, if something asks for everything under the sun and won't work without it, the app can data-mine all day... all it will get is random garbage for contacts, random meme pictures, and randomly generated death metal band names.

    6. Re:Actually one of my beefs by c · · Score: 2

      the next step is that applications start crashing when you revoke their permissions, or the authors simply refuse to let them run.

      A good sandbox makes it hard or impossible to find the sides of the box.

      The way things are implemented by Cyanogenmod's Privacy Guard, the application gets an empty data set and has no way to know if the permissions have been revoked. In the context of text messages, it might not even be able to tell the difference between having permissions revoked, being on a tablet without SMS, and being on a phone that's never received a text.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    7. Re:Actually one of my beefs by tthomas48 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because a third party text messaging app could be much better than the one built into your phone? Because a third party app could offer you mesh networking, tethering with multiple SIDs and VLAN isolation, etc.

    8. Re:Actually one of my beefs by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2

      I've found that most of the time the only permission I really need to deny is the ability to access the internet. Since Android has iptables that's easy, and there are front ends (I like AFWall+) if you don't want to use a shell script for it. The "Android Tuner" app can also apparently manage permissions, using the Xposed framework.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    9. Re:Actually one of my beefs by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 2

      You mean like XPrivacy ?

      --
      A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
    10. Re: Actually one of my beefs by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2

      If you're referring to the Play Services (the one piece of the OS that is completely out of user control), Ars Technica talked about this recently. That was changed so that it would be more helpful to users in that Google would no longer be at the mercy of wireless carriers to upgrade certain parts of the operating system. By integrating Play Services at the core of the OS, they can theoretically upgrade almost any part they want without having to provide completely new firmware. That improves security, too, because they can install patches that the carriers would otherwise block for QA reasons.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    11. Re:Actually one of my beefs by tibman · · Score: 2

      Lol, i was thinking the same thing. Want to listen to texts and perform an action? Or just replace the whole sub-system? Simply not possible on iOS. Side-stepping an issue is not solving it.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  3. Social Networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ALL - and I mean ALL - of these social networking sites and apps exist for one thing and on thing only - to extract your information.

    They have the data and know that they can manipulate your buying habits. You will not agree with this. I know you wont. But you are manipulable.

    We all are.

    It's NOT 'You will eat at Joes!'

    It's more like, 'Hmmm, I want to go out and eat, How about Joes?'

    That's all it takes.

    And with Big Data, they got us.

    1. Re:Social Networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I resent the notion that product trend manipulation works on everyone. It does not, and it doesn't have to. It only has to work on enough people to make it worthwhile.

  4. SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by lesincompetent · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uninstalled the app, started using FB via browser. For my low intensity usage it's still perfect. Also links to click and youtube embeds work seamlessly now.
    Got no messenger installed too.

    1. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Informative

      As soon as I saw this I uninstalled Facebook as well. My battery life has improved a bit. Also recently uninstalled Google Talk (now called "Hangouts (Replaces Google Talk)") because it started asking for access to my text messages as well. I've noticed a lot of apps asking for increased privileges lately. I usually uninstall them if it's something I don't really need. I wonder if the developers get statistics about number of people who uninstalled the app?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by asavage · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google hangouts wants to read your text messages as it is the default text message app for kitkat.

    3. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My battery life has improved a bit. Also recently uninstalled Google Talk (now called "Hangouts (Replaces Google Talk)") because it started asking for access to my text messages as well.

      That shouldn't come as too much of a surprise, since Hangouts is the app for text messaging these days. I just upgraded to a new Nexus 5, for example, and there is no separate Messaging app. Hangouts handles that function by default.

      Moving back on-topic, App Ops X is a good start, and I'm disappointed with Google for removing this function from the base system and making it increasingly difficult to install and use. Ideally I'd prefer for users to have complete control over permissions, in a way which is completely transparent to the app. The app doesn't need to know that network access is blocked; it just gets a "no signal" response, or "destination unreachable" when attempting to access particular domains. It doesn't need to know that you've restricted access to the contact list; it just gets its own, private contact list. It doesn't need to know you've restricted location access, it just sees "acquiring GPS signal...". And so on. If the app can see what you've restricted, then the app can be designed to refuse to function until you've removed the restriction, which defeats the whole point. The sandbox approach is the only reasonable way to have fine-grained permissions under the user's control.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    4. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by tobiasly · · Score: 2

      Uninstalled the app, started using FB via browser. For my low intensity usage it's still perfect. Also links to click and youtube embeds work seamlessly now.
      Got no messenger installed too.

      A thousand times this. The line for me was when my recent camera pics popped up in the app with a caption "do you want to post these to Facebook"? Uhh, fuck no Facebook and stop rifling your grubby mitts through my pics without asking me TYVM (Dropbox, Twitter, Google+ all have similar functionality but have an explicit settings for this).

      This is also a weakness in Android permissions IMO: many apps ask for USB access to store their own data but that means they can read everything under /sdcard including photos.

      Now I use the mobile site, plus Slice if needed. The only drawback is that apps which require Facebook to login now require an OAuth web dialog where I have to log in again, whereas before the Facebook app showed the confirmation with no re-auth required.

  5. Re:Think of the children by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

    This is the dumbest line of reasoning for new corporate abuses. "Think about what those 0.1% of private citizens might do if they had similar access!"

    Rather than, "Your ours now, since you've ever used our service." I'm not entirely sure the facebook bloatware that comes on cell phones won't provide this data back for even non-users like me. You just can't prove it, since the walled-garden prevents you from installing your own security measures.

    The big corporations feel entitled to our private lives, and we can't stop them.

  6. simple fix on android by tresstatus · · Score: 2

    Root
    install xposed framework
    install AppOpsXposed
    remove permission to almost everything

    i checked mine and noted that the new permission had been added but never used

    --
    stephen
  7. Re:Why use their app? by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have tintoil installed and I don't even own any electronics.

  8. SMS Integration by ottothecow · · Score: 3, Informative
    They want to be able to view your messages, so that they can do the same thing google is doing with Hangouts:

    Put both your SMS and your Instant messaging in the same app (just pushing facebook chat over hangout chat).

    --
    Bottles.
  9. ... and so does twitter ... by hpoul · · Score: 2

    ... and many other apps. No idea why they really need those permissions just so users don't need to copy over a verification number. This is ridiculous... i wonder if they did research what more users would accept.. having their app require the permission to read *all* SMS .. or just requiring the user to occasionally type a one time password from the SMS app into the twitter/facebook/whatever app.

    this is really something android has to solve.. something like optional permissions for the lazy users who really want to have that single features which requires all your personal data.. it's not just as a user, but it's also annoying as a developer - i could obviously also just make the user download 3 different apps for each functionality, and have fine grained permissions this way, but this can't be the best solution..

    --
    Find me at http://herbert.poul.at
  10. Well there you go by Java+Pimp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Facebook says it is only so it can facilitate two-factor authentication

    No need to question it further. A completely benign reason with no ulterior motive. Just allow it and be happy. Facebook wouldn't do anything against your wishes...

    --
    Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
    Kull: She told me she was 19!
  11. facebook wants to know more about you.... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That is why facebook does anything it does, it wants to know all about you, your friends and relatives.

    .
    facebook even collects the posts you start typing but decide not to send.

  12. Re:So it can authenticate by sending a text by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

    What Facebook wants to do is send a text message with a special code to your phone. Letting the app read your text messages allows the app to read the code automatically so you don't have to copy and paste from the messages app.

    But what else is the app reading in my text messages?

  13. Removed app + hidden services from ROM long ago by hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I couldn't be happier now that I've completely purged Facebook and its hidden (SNS, not a typo) services from my ROM and phone, and frozen/deleted all of the other assets in other apps that try to "phone home" to Facebook. Side benefit is that after removing Facebook from my phone, I gained seven solid HOURS of battery life back. I didn't realize how often the SNS service and Facebook itself were sending and receiving data, phoning home, etc.

    The combination of Android Permission Manager, DroidWall and LBE Security Master have made things much easier to block, delete, drop packets, deny and forbid services from trying to use unnecessary permissions.

    I guarantee that no app is doing what it shouldn't, and those that should have permissions (Camera => Take Photos Permission) are prompted every time they attempt to do so, never allowed by default. If I'm not using the Camera for example, and I get a popup that it tried to take a photo, I permanently deny it and remove/uninstall the app. I don't tolerate any of that out-of-band behavior on my phone.

    You should investigate the same. Yes, we all know about the L4 kernel, but this at least will help remove the abuse from the application level.

    1. Re:Removed app + hidden services from ROM long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The combination of Android Permission Manager, DroidWall and LBE Security Master have made things much easier to block, delete, drop packets, deny and forbid services from trying to use unnecessary permissions.

      Dear members, please remember that installing closed source software as root will automatically voids your paranoid member card.

      Permission Manager and LBE Security Master are both closed source, and need root to run. Not acceptable.
      Bonus points, LBE's home page is in chinese, no offense intended, just paranoid.

      On the other hand, Xprivacy does the same job and is GPL'd.
      By the way, Droidwall is severely outdated, you might consider trying its (open source) successor / fork, AFWall +

      Being paranoid is a full time job !

    2. Re:Removed app + hidden services from ROM long ago by hacker · · Score: 2

      Yes, there are quite a few apps that ask for access/permission to things they clearly should not have permissions for. I've taken quite a few screenshots of the abuse, posted on my Twitpic feed. Look closely at the dates some of these were posted:

      http://twitpic.com/dfg0wn

      http://twitpic.com/d7sepd

      http://twitpic.com/ckgra5

      http://twitpic.com/ckgr11

      I found the issue with Brightest Flashlight almost a full year ago, now it's just recently hit the news. Sigh.
      http://twitpic.com/cjlfvr

      http://twitpic.com/cjl3r1

      http://twitpic.com/cjg0q3

  14. Re:The bigger issue... by hacker · · Score: 3, Informative

    You don't need to use the Facebook app on your phone, you can use the mobile version of the website, or if you're using Android (as is the case with the OP's gripe), you can use Tinfoil for Facebook.

    Remember to uninstall Facebook as an app and from ROM including the SNS service (not a typo), to completely rid your handset of that mess.

    If you don't want to do that, use Orbot and the mobile site over Tor using the Orweb Privacy Browser.

  15. Another simple solution by stevegee58 · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) Go to "Account Settings"
    2) Press "Deactivate you account"
    3) Get an effin' life.

    1. Re:Another simple solution by alex67500 · · Score: 2

      1) Go to "Account Settings"
      2) Press "Deactivate you account"
      3) Get an effin' life.
      4) ???
      5) Profit!

      FTFY. You must be new here ;-)

  16. Re:Think of the children by mandark1967 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's the sound goatse makes when he farts

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  17. Re:Think of the children by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

    We can't?

    Facebook didn't get any kind of information from me. Take a wild guess how I accomplished this feat.

    Hint: They can't exist without us. We can exist just fine without them.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. im sure the dialog is scripted. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    user: Facebook, why do you want to read my text messages?
    Facebook:Fuck you, thats why.
    user: okay.jpg.


    All joking aside though, seriously, stop using facebook. You're the product, not the consumer, so none of your opinions or concerns sincerely matter.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  19. Re:Sigh. Blackberry fixed this more than a decade by Njovich · · Score: 2

    The real security for blackberry apps is in that they made it such a PITA to develop for Blackberry that nobody bothers.

  20. Re:Why use their app? by borcharc · · Score: 2

    I am more interested in why Google Play Services transmits my fine location, wifi-scan, cell scan, and GPS data 24/7.... Although FB has perms for lots of stuff, the logs on my phone report that is SMS has never been accessed. If you are rooted install AppOpsXposed and see for yourself.

  21. Wish there were a Cyanogenmod for my phone by barlevg · · Score: 2

    I recently installed Cyanogenmod on my old phone (HTC G2/Desire) so my wife, who's taken possession of it, could use some 4.x-only apps. I couldn't believe how beautifully it runs on a three-year-old phone (I mean, it's SLOW, but everything WORKS), and the lack of bloatware and pre-installed apps (read: Facebook) makes me super jealous. I'd put Cyanogenmod on my current phone (Samsung Galaxy Relay), but last I checked, there weren't any stable builds for it with an Android version greater than what I've got now (4.1).

  22. Re:Think of the children by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And if bloatware on your phone is eating your private messages and sending them off to a company you never signed up for an account with, would you know?

  23. I installed alien sheild goodness. by emil · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:I installed alien sheild goodness. by tbuddy · · Score: 2

      That's great for the 10 million of the 900+ million Android devices out there. I'm going to wager that many of the Cyanogenmod users aren't the Facebook type anyway. It's also only for Cyanogenmod 10.2, which is just recently considered stable and not supported on a great many devices.

  24. Blackberry by QBasicer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blackberry actually had this right. Apps requested permission when you installed them, you could either allow, deny, or ask it to prompt you first. It would be really awesome if Android had that feature too.

    --
    x86, oh yes, I'm pro.
  25. Re:Why use their app? by jkflying · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So that Google can provide geolocation for devices without GPS by fingerprinting the signal strength patterns and access point names you see. They also use it for road traffic reports - where do you think Google Maps gets its traffic data from?

    --
    Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
  26. Simple: Android permissions are not fine enough by krelvin · · Score: 2

    Simple. They want to be able to get a status from SMS text and the only way to get that is to get permission to the SMS Messages. There is no finer permission level in Android to just give them what they need without access to the rest.

    I just block that access since I don't want to use their messaging anyway. Blocked with Root, Xposed Framework, XPrivacy to control which permissions I want to allow them to have.

  27. Im not updating by el+momia · · Score: 2

    I saw that odd permission request today, fuck me if I ever update this crapware again

  28. Re:So it can authenticate by sending a text by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

    This is a perfect example of why is should be possible to give an app temporary permission to do something, or to selectively deny permissions. This type of authentication is something that only needs to be done once over the lifetime of the device. If I was using it, I would just copy/paste the code -- and someone who is less paranoid could allow the facebook app to read their text messages at setup time, and then deny that permission from that point on. Instead what we end up with is that after you've gone through that authentication step, Facebook will be able to read your text messages forever more.

    But I assume that most people are just going to shrug and install the app anyway. I know that way back when, facebook would bug me to give them my email password so that they could go look up all my contacts. It's hard to believe that people actually fall for crap like that -- but apparently they do.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  29. Re:Think of the children by jigawatt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We can't?

    Facebook didn't get any kind of information from me. Take a wild guess how I accomplished this feat.

    Hint: They can't exist without us. We can exist just fine without them.

    So you've never texted anybody who uses facebook?

    You can close your mouth now.

  30. They target ads via datamining by Theovon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don’t know why this is so hard for people to understand. Facebook’s primary source of revenue is ads. Just like Google. They increases the probability that you’ll click on one by examining every last bit of your data that goes through their system. That’s the whole thing in a nutshell.

    It amazes me that people are surprised by this.

    Don’t put anything on the internet that you don’t want Facebook, Google, the NSA, and every one else looking at. If you store something encrypted on the internet, there’s a chance someone will hack it and get your data anyway. NOTHING IS PRIVATE ON THE INTERNET. Yes, I have a Facebook account, which I use rarely to connect with friends and family. I don’t talk about anything sensitive, and I don’t publish any information that isn’t the sort of thing I would be embarrassed to appear on my LinkedIn profile, which is something I WANT people to see.

    The key here isn’t to to complain about Facebook’s policies. That isn’t going to change because 99% of people just accept them anyway. The key is to avoid those services if you object to them. There are many other things in life that make you become publically visible, not limited by any means fo Facebook. Perhaps you want to avoid those too. Good. If ultimately the majority of people decide they don’t like being probed like this, perhaps Facebook will chance. But probably not because they’ll still have a billion users.

    Some really stupid picture of you getting drunk from 5 years ago is still on the Internet somewhere, and employers WILL find it. I think this is awesome. In this economic environment, I’m very glad to have more ways that people remove themselves from competition with me when I’m looking for a job. Some people just don’t do really stupid things, while others are forward-looking enough to keep them from getting published. Either way, those are the sorts of people I want to hire in preference to jackasses who think it’s funny to show everyone how stupid they are.

    1. Re:They target ads via datamining by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

      You understand that this very rant is a good excuse for someone to not hire you, right? It isn't just drunk pictures, it's opinionated text that's a danger as well. Opinionated as in, not the same opinion as theirs.

    2. Re:They target ads via datamining by sinij · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>>Don't put anything on the internet that you don't want Facebook, Google, the NSA, and every one else looking at.
       
        This is a very good advice that I followed to the letter when I killed my sister and buried her body in my backyard so I could collect insurance money.
       
        -Bill from KY, Carlisle County

  31. this is what broke my camels back by onepoint · · Score: 2

    I did not really think to much about privacy until this update.
    Now I am slowly deleting and detoxing from facebook
    while I did not give a hoot before, now I can only wonder why I did not do this sooner.

    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
  32. Re:Why use their app? by heypete · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So that Google can provide geolocation for devices without GPS by fingerprinting the signal strength patterns and access point names you see. They also use it for road traffic reports - where do you think Google Maps gets its traffic data from?

    Exactly. When I activated a new Nexus tablet it explained in plain language about the Google Location Reporting (how they get data for the wifi geolocation you mention) and ask whether or not one wishes to activate it or not.

    You can disable it in Settings --> Location --> Google Location Reporting. Turning GLR off does not interfere with other location-related things (for example, you can turn off GLR but still use the geolocation functions in Google Maps or other apps).

  33. Re:Think of the children by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

    Why do you have that kind of phone instead of a simple phonic device? Yes, they exist, i have one.

  34. Re:Think of the children by unrtst · · Score: 2

    What is this "Walled Garden" on Android of which you speak?

    The one that won't let you uninstall any app that was shipped with the phone.

    Yes, you can install other apps and sideload apps (in most cases at least). "Walled Garden" generally refers to the being restricted to one app store, but I'd agree that it loosely applies here as well.

    You may be able to root the device and/or install cyanogen or some other OS. In most cases, that does not override the fact that there is a walled garden... it just means the walls are not perfect.

    For an example, how do you remove "Story Album" from a Samsung Galaxy S4 without rooting the device?
    If some app is already installed, and you can't remove it, you have no way to control what it has access to without more drastic steps (rooting). This is the intent of the distributor.

  35. Re:Think of the children by mlk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because I don't want a phone. I want a PDA.

    I also want to phone people every once in a blue moon and have always-on access to various IM clients. I don't want to carry two devices.

    Now you don't want this and it is great that you can get a device that meets your needs. I can get a device that meets my needs but alas now they all come with shit installed.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  36. One reason why I'm giving up on Android by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

    When I was deciding on a tablet, I was waffling on what to get but the issue of privacy ended up being the thing that decided me.

    With Android, you have no choice but to accept the permissions that an app insists on. Either that, or don't use the app. Combine that with Google stating outright that they plan on *reducing* privacy protections, I wasn't happy.

    Then I researched the privacy protections in iOS. You have the ability to selectively deny or allow what an application is allowed to see, and can change your choice later on if you change your mind. Say what you will about Apple, but at least they're making a decent effort in this regard.

  37. Re:Think of the children by briancox2 · · Score: 2

    PacMan ROMS have Privacy Guard that allows you to disable those "permissions" you give for apps upon install. The app will think it's doing what it wants. But you're in control.

    Rooting and flashing a new ROM is the best thing you can do for your privacy.

    --
    We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
  38. Re:android is so broken... by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 2

    Not sure iOS is any less broken - they don't ask you about some things, they just share them anyway. As soon as I got an iPhone and installed the LinkedIn app, linked in started asking me if I wanted to connect to people/organizations that I haven't had anything to do with in years - but they happened to be in my contact list on the phone. Hmmmm.....

  39. Re:Why use their app? by Andrio · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also, you can do what I did, which was just create a shortcut to the mobile facebook website and place it on your homescreen. You get a nice looking icon that says "Facebook" under it, as if it were an actual app.

    Yeah, the app was "better," but at least I don't have to worry about what it's leaching from my phone (and consequently, hurting battery life/usng data)

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  40. ever tried to prove that you are not a camel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If one cannot remove a silly true photo of oneself from the tubes, then the same is true for the fakes. How many employers ever tried to verify the photos, they have seen on the tubes? The point is - somebody may have posted a photo with you having fun with a camel, a photo which was a fake. Your prospective employers may not even bother to verify. The fun part is - they may not even bother to tell you whether they rejected you because they got excited out of this photo , because they did not or just because they did not like the camel's smile. The memory of the tubes is another subject than the ones discussed on this thread and one that that you failed to analyse properly. But hey that is ok - now you can go and have fun with the camel anyway - this does not make any difference anymore...

  41. Re:Think of the children by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Yes, I have never texted anyone who uses facebook. I can say that with some sort of credibility due to never texting. I'm one of those odd people who prefer to, ya know, make PHONE calls with a PHONE.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. This was the last drop. by cuby · · Score: 2

    My nexus S was getting slow and I needed another phone. For some time I was seeing google changing open applications for closed ones. I already knew that the permissions on android were broken. I never installed LinkedIn because of the calendar permission... No reason for that! And then I see this Facebook update and an older one asking to authorize the keyboard to access the internet... Why?? I talked with some Friends with iPhones and I got convinced that iOS protects me better. I bought a second hand iPhone 5.

    --
    Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
  43. Re:Think of the children by postbigbang · · Score: 2

    There is snoopwall and others that stanch the flow of bad stuff. But honestly, Facebook ought to heavily fined for their boorish invasion of privacy. The data hogs need to be taught a lesson of the value of ecosystems, which is that if your customers revolt, your business model is dead.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  44. Re:Why use their app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    So that you can type your friend's name into the Maps search bar and get directions to their house.

  45. m.facebook.com by popdookey · · Score: 2

    With Firefox. Using Ghostery. It's about the safest way I can find to use and be used by Facebook on my Android-based Nexus 4.

    --
    Success without humility is an indulgence in arrogance
  46. This is an Android flaw by Askmum · · Score: 2

    These kind of "strange" permissions are quite common. Lately, my online banking Android app asked permission to access the camera. Now why would a banking app require access to the camera? Apparently because they have added the possibility to scan checks.
    Ok, all very nice. But now you have access to the camera. How can I see that you are not using it all the time? Just ask for access when you are going to use it, not when you install an app that may want to use it.
    IMHO this is a flaw in Android app permissions.