Slashdot Mirror


Rome Police Use Twitter To Battle Illegal Parking

cartechboy writes "Illegal parking has always been a major problem in Rome. More than half of Rome's 2.7 million residents use private vehicles, and the ancient city has a staggering ratio of 70 cars per 100 residents. So many residents park, uh, creatively. But now authorities think they've found a way to fight bad parking using social media. Basically, they've asked residents to post photos of bad parking jobs to Twitter. In December, the Italian cops began encouraging smart phone users to snap pics of illegally parked cars and tweet those photos to the department's Twitter account. The new system, which was created by Raffaele Clemente, Rome's chief of traffic police, seems to be working. In the first 30 days, police received more than 1,000 complaints tweeted to their account; (one example is here). Officials were able to respond to around 740 and hand out citations."

157 comments

  1. Yea... Good Luck With That. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, 'your car is being towed' is trending!

    #StupidShitPeopleThinkIsSmart #FAIL

    1. Re:Yea... Good Luck With That. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      #StupidShitPeopleThinkIsSmart #FAIL

      Indeed. Classic case of treating the symptom rather than the cause.

    2. Re:Yea... Good Luck With That. by davester666 · · Score: 2

      now it will be a competition. get a picture of your car posted, parked in the most outrageous position possible.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Yea... Good Luck With That. by N1AK · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Classic case of treating the symptom rather than the cause.

      That rather depends on where you define symptom and cause, sometimes the only practical action that can be taken is to address something part way down the chain. Is the 'cause' that everyone isn't able to walk to everything they need? Or would you say the cause was just that there isn't enough parking?

      In this case, even if we take "there isn't enough parking" as the cause this may well still address it. Perhaps the cost of converting land into more parking etc is too high to justify when people can get away with poor parking. As it becomes more costly to park poorly the amount people will be willing to pay to use proper parking will increase and more parking spaces will be built. I'm not saying it will work like this but it's hardly an unlikely chain of events.

    4. Re:Yea... Good Luck With That. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they're italian.

      a good "cause" for them to park wherever the fuck they happen to want is that it's tuesday.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Yea... Good Luck With That. by frisket · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?

  2. Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically, they've asked residents to post photos of bad parking jobs to Twitter.

    Why not just use the non-emergency number that most police agencies have to report a parking infraction? This just puts millions of license plates at risk of being put online for the purpose of reporting a person's supposedly bad parking.

    Better education, less regulation and all that...

    1. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when is a license plate private? It's as public as the number on your house, and Google Street already put those online.

    2. Re:Privacy Risks by megabeck42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At risk of being put online? Don't people risk exposing their license plates every time they back out of the garage?

      I think the real concern is, "This just puts millions of illegally parking individuals at risk of being publicly shamed."

      The best protection for any one concerned their license plate may end up online seems pretty simple and obvious: think ahead, be considerate, and don't park like an asshole.

      --
      fnord.
    3. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't be an asshole.

      I was born this way, you insensitive asshole!

    4. Re:Privacy Risks by rollingcalf · · Score: 4, Informative

      A picture is often more useful than a verbal complaint when the police are evaluating whether a given parking situation actually is a violation, and the exact location where it occurred.

      And for citizens armed with a cellphone camera and Twitter, it's faster for them to post a pic than to sit on the non-emergency line for several minutes, first on hold for 5 minutes, then some more minutes to describe the vehicle and the location.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    5. Re:Privacy Risks by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      i dont know if its law or not in america, but more often than not you will see the plate blured out for privacy reasons on TV shows for instance

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    6. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you tried... not being an asshole?

    7. Re:Privacy Risks by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not just use the non-emergency number that most police agencies have to report a parking infraction?

      Because this provides photographic proof of the bad parking before they send out a meter maid.

      This just puts millions of license plates at risk of being put online for the purpose of reporting a person's supposedly bad parking.

      Never quite understood this whole 'privacy of license plates' thing. If I look out the window right now I can see a dozen+ license plates. If I went for a walk I'd see hundreds. How is it private if there are two of them on every car for everyone to see?

    8. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      America is litigation land, and they just don't want the hassle of any frivolous lawsuits.

    9. Re:Privacy Risks by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      (one of) the other concerns is Police Work as Social Media Gamification.

      It's like Ender's Game - They can turn it into some kind of dehumanized gamification contest, whereas until now people had a bit of slack leeway.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    10. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Never quite understood this whole 'privacy of license plates' thing. If I look out the window right now I can see a dozen+ license plates. If I went for a walk I'd see hundreds. How is it private if there are two of them on every car for everyone to see?

      It's not about making license plates more private, it's about limiting the places one can find instances of the plate. I wouldn't want someone to know that I was located somewhere at a certain time for whatever reason. What if I park somewhere and the guy that parks in the spot next to me does something stupid that warrants one of these images to be sent to the police department and my car happens to be visible in the picture?

      I just dislike databases upon databases of our information that we can't control.

    11. Re:Privacy Risks by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      Never quite understood this whole 'privacy of license plates' thing. If I look out the window right now I can see a dozen+ license plates. If I went for a walk I'd see hundreds. How is it private if there are two of them on every car for everyone to see?

      The word privacy has multiple definitions. In this case, the apropriate definition is ephemeral. You looking at a license plate informs one person, you, about the time and location of that plate. You posting a picture of that online creates a perment record that potentially millions of people can access.

      It is the same thing as using a debit card and the clerk looking at the card number versus the POS computer making a permanent record of the card number. The first is a very small risk, the second is essentially an unbounded risk as customers of Target, Neiman-Marcus and Michaels have come to find out.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:Privacy Risks by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Never quite understood this whole 'privacy of license plates' thing. If I look out the window right now I can see a dozen+ license plates. If I went for a walk I'd see hundreds. How is it private if there are two of them on every car for everyone to see?

      It's not about making license plates more private, it's about limiting the places one can find instances of the plate. I wouldn't want someone to know that I was located somewhere at a certain time for whatever reason. What if I park somewhere and the guy that parks in the spot next to me does something stupid that warrants one of these images to be sent to the police department and my car happens to be visible in the picture?

      I just dislike databases upon databases of our information that we can't control.

      The only way to solve your paranoia is to take public transportation. The chances that someone might take a picture that has your car in it is very good these days. Probably still slim it will happen, but since most everyone has a camera on their cell phone, yes, the chances are greater.

      But lets be real. No one gives a fuck about you, no one cares where you are at, and if they did, they wouldn't need random strangers to post pics of your car online, they'd just have someone following you.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    13. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is kind of different from purchasing records at a store, as the store itself has incentive to not just post people's credit card numbers online, as it could impact their sales. Additionally, it is a lot harder to get a person's credit card number normally, as you either have to be watching really close when they use it, physically get a hold of it without the person knowing, or hope that the store screws up their security.

      A license plate number on the other hand can be written down by anyone with little to no effort. If you had time to waste, nothing is stopping you from keeping a record of all the license plates that go past a particular street, or into a particular parking lot. It is a lot harder to do that with credit card numbers, but there is also more damage you can do with the credit card number than a license plate number in general. There are examples of people recording license plates and images of the person visiting places like pornography stores or abortion clinics, and posting those things online. At some point you have to accept that by going outside, you will be seen, and you don't have any control over how and what form of memory that will end up.

    14. Re:Privacy Risks by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

      Its the fantasy of innocent until proven guilty theory. Sounds nice but not very pratical lol

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    15. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But lets be real. No one gives a fuck about you, no one cares where you are at, and if they did, they wouldn't need random strangers to post pics of your car online, they'd just have someone following you.

      Do you apply this same logic to the NSA? Government abuses of power are very real, and while *you* may not be a target, someone else will be. History shows that many millions of times over.

    16. Re:Privacy Risks by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      He can't help it - he has torsonic polarity syndrome.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    17. Re: Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being a criminal then.

    18. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not thinking creatively enough. Stalkers can stalk or harass by encouraging others to take pictures, I could use it to get even. Pretty soon you're going to see someone organize a protest where cars from other cities are sent in.

    19. Re: Privacy Risks by Trulak · · Score: 0

      No victim, no crime. Find me the victim that is hurt because of bad parking, on a public road or public property, (private property is different) and I might change my mind.

    20. Re:Privacy Risks by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      I just dislike databases upon databases of our information that we can't control.

      One of the first steps in treating these things is to surrender to those things out of your control and become accepting of them.

    21. Re: Privacy Risks by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Most no parking areas are determined by the need to keep roadways clear for things like emergency vehicles (fire lanes), or to keep the roadway safe for other motorists (e.g. no parking too close to a corner, intersection or bus stop).

      There's certainly exceptions -- my neighborhood has no parking signs on streets to just make for a pretty neighborhood, but that's a HOA thing, something I could easily fight, and something I opted into when I moved here.

    22. Re:Privacy Risks by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      It's not a fantasy; until recently it was an established legal principle.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    23. Re:Privacy Risks by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

      I wasn't serious. hence the lol at the end.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    24. Re:Privacy Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had time to waste

      And there's the problem. This would be astronomically costly and inefficient for humans to track license plates like that in various locations. Computers can do it easily.

      At some point you have to accept that by going outside, you will be seen, and you don't have any control over how and what form of memory that will end up.

      No. As soon as you accept that thugs can track your every location, you've become a mindless drone.

  3. nada says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mama don't like tattletales

    1. Re:nada says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mama don't like disrespectful assholes who think they don't have to follow the rules.

    2. Re:nada says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nada had two things to say about following the rules:
      "I follow the rules. Everybody's got their own hard times these days."
      Later on he just said, "Fuck it."

  4. Town planning - lack of. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What irks me is the lack of town planning for cars in European cities then the incompetent authorities act like it is all the citizens fault. I get that they have ancient medieval town centers that are almost impossible to modify - but that is no excuse for not providing adequate amounts of free to almost free just out-of-town parking and efficient cheap public transport into the centers (efficient does not mean it has to be profitable in the direct sense).

    Singapore for example with so little space has pioneered high rise cheap parking for all out in the suburbs and electronic pay to enter town centers that really increased the quality of life in the inner city, or so I hear.

    Don't get me started on the last century traffic lights on timers and no trigger sensors of any kind in sight even at the pedestrian crossings. Christmas lights I like to call them. The amount of petrol they must waste stopping scores of cars for no reason must be mind-boggling.

    /rant off.

    1. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Quality of life and a "socialist" public transport system are not in vogue in "Austerity for no good reason" Europe.

    2. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      London copied Singapore's electronic pay as you enter "congestion charge" town centers. It is more or less a positive outcome but it could be improved.

    3. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congestion pricing. From the other link: "As for London, ten years on, no one is proposing scrapping or diluting the congestion charge. Motorists pay to drive in that city’s congested center, the sky hasn’t fallen, and life on the ground is demonstrably safer, healthier, and better."

    4. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that this has been a problem for at least 20 if not 30+ years. The Italian government is a best incompetent......

    5. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Italian government is a best incompetent......

      It could be worse. At least they don't make the trains run on time anymore.

    6. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's because most town planning like this is run by civil engineers. And not just any civil engineer... civil engineers that couldn't find jobs in the private sector and work for the government. The gutter trash of the engineering world.

    7. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed! Ask any city level civil engineer if they've read Christopher Alexander or even heard of him.... usually you'll get a confused look in response.

    8. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Sique · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What irks me is the lack of town planning for cars in European cities then the incompetent authorities act like it is all the citizens fault.

      First, those towns were planned when there were no cars at all. Second, some towns tried to restructure itself into a more car friendly town, and the result was a less human friendly town. For some reasons, the most searched for towns are those with a horrible parking situation. So blame who you want, towns with a not adequate parking situation fare better in general, because they seem to get the general idea how to operate a town, and one aspect seems to not concentrate on cars too much.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    9. Re:Town planning - lack of. by godrik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whie I entirely aggree with you that the main problem comes from the city lacking the proper parking spaces, that makes it no excuse to park like a complete douche.

    10. Re:Town planning - lack of. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You did not read past the first sentence of my post, obviously. Here is the second sentence for your convenience: "I get that they have ancient medieval town centers that are almost impossible to modify - but that is no excuse for not providing adequate amounts of free to almost free just out-of-town parking and efficient cheap public transport into the centers.

    11. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But the issue with Rome is the people that live there and the cars they drive - I highly doubt they would be interested in out of town park and rides.

    12. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actuelly, you can blame people for buying a car (or two) when they don't have anywhere to put it. Authorities can do the planning, or they can leave it to private initiative. I.e. you buy land for a garage, then buy a car.

    13. Re:Town planning - lack of. by jwdb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What irks me is the lack of town planning for cars in European cities then the incompetent authorities act like it is all the citizens fault. I get that they have ancient medieval town centers that are almost impossible to modify - but that is no excuse for not providing adequate amounts of free to almost free just out-of-town parking and efficient cheap public transport into the centers (efficient does not mean it has to be profitable in the direct sense).

      You're not looking hard enough. Most of the major cities I've driven to in the EU (Belgium and the Netherlands, primarily, over five years) had significant parking on the outskirts of town (never free, land costs money) near the end of the city metro lines. Drop the car there, take the tram, and enjoy a city built at a human scale. Or even better, take the train right into downtown.

      I've moved back to the US recently, and I dearly miss those compact cities. I'm in a small city in Georgia now and it's disgusting how much prime downtown space is wasted on empty parking lots. I'd much rather have no parking at all rather than too much, as then you can at least walk or bike.

      Don't get me started on the last century traffic lights on timers and no trigger sensors of any kind in sight even at the pedestrian crossings.

      Traffic lights is a different matter, and apparently depends on your driving style. I never had a problem flowing through light after light back home, but here I'm constantly being stopped. I'm sure I'll eventually get used to the timing here, as you would over there.

    14. Re:Town planning - lack of. by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realize that most European cities existed for hundreds or even thousands of years before cars were invented?

    15. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traffic lights is a different matter, and apparently depends on your driving style. I never had a problem flowing through light after light back home, but here I'm constantly being stopped. I'm sure I'll eventually get used to the timing here, as you would over there.

      Triggered lights done right should still allow flow along the major route short of some messed up traffic pattern situations. You still have the lights timed to allow flow, just don't change if there is not some one actually there, or have the option for a shorter change if there are not many people there. I've seen bad designed traffic signals in about every country and US state I've traveled too, but I've also seen plenty of well designed ones. It isn't about getting used to one style or another, but about some amount of luck that went into whoever constructed the system and if the municipality ever bothers to do studies and improvements to places after they have been constructed.

    16. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get that they have ancient medieval town centers that are almost impossible to modify

      Just FYI, Rome isn't medieval. The middle ages started around the fifth century. The city of Rome was over a thousand years old at that point.

    17. Re:Town planning - lack of. by ciotog · · Score: 2

      Don't get me started on the last century traffic lights on timers and no trigger sensors of any kind in sight even at the pedestrian crossings. Christmas lights I like to call them. The amount of petrol they must waste stopping scores of cars for no reason must be mind-boggling.

      If they make driving too convenient, then people will drive more often and farther away, which would consume even more petrol than idling at a traffic light occasionally.

    18. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the issue with Rome is the people that live there

      So very true of every city.

    19. Re:Town planning - lack of. by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Informative

      You keep thinking like this is the US where literally no one lives in the center which is composed of office spaces. This is not the case in European cities. Many people live in the center and quite often their building has no parking space at all. Because it was built in the XIXth century or whatever when people did not need such things. And the streets are often narrow because horses needed less space to move around.

    20. Re:Town planning - lack of. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Yeah and even back then Nero wanted to burn it down and rebuild it because he thought the city design was too old.

    21. Re:Town planning - lack of. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Last time I drove in London, I took about an hour to cover one mile. Solely because, when my light went green, the light ahead was still red, so there was only space for one or two cars to move forward during the green part of the cycle. As soon as we got past the last traffic light and onto the main road, we were doing 40mph within seconds.

      Fortunately, 'congestion charging' will clearly solve that.

    22. Re:Town planning - lack of. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Did you notice that "congestion pricing" was only a part of the solution. Another part was providing places to park away from the center, with good transit connections to good transit. There are other parts to making it a good solution, which basicly come under the ruberic of "pedestrian amenities", though you could include bicycles, too. Do note, however, that bicycle amenities are often very different from pedestrian amenities.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    23. Re:Town planning - lack of. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      If there were good public transit, and secure long-term storage places (wherre, e.g., the battery could be kept charged) then they might be interested. Particularly if sensible parking regulations were enforced. This, however, looks like putting enforcement before the alternative. OTOH, it's a Slashdot summary, so who knows what's really going on.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    24. Re:Town planning - lack of. by HiThere · · Score: 2

      ??? If you don't have the lights timed, then you can't design to allow flow. It just doesn't work. Even with timed lights it's quite difficult to have good flow in two different directions. (You *can* do it if you'ver very careful about the timing...or if you allow the flow to be broken around every 10 blocks...and only have about one street out of 10 timed for flow.) Note that even so if you want flow in two orthogonal directions, you may need to be very careful with the speeds that you allow to flow.

      But you can't allow lights to change at other than the specified times. I suppose you could decide to skip an entire cycle, but that usually wouldn't speed up the traffic flow. Somewhere along the route someone would be on a cross street, and their light would change...which would mean that the street that they crossed would change out of sequence with the other lights, and .... it's just a bad idea.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    25. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First the government screw up the cities

      Well, seeing as this is London, and was "planned" over hundreds of years, I don't think that criticism works as well as you think.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    26. Re:Town planning - lack of. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No I have lived in the center of my fare share of European cities. All your points are correct and also the reason why you can't park there. My point is: Not only is there nowhere to park in the center, there is nowhere to park out of the center, either. i.e. lack of town planning.

    27. Re:Town planning - lack of. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 1

      Your right I painted with a broad brush by saying "European cities". All the ones I have lived in (Italy, Spain, France...) but not including Belgium or the Netherlands have the problem I describe. Not all in Italy are so bad either, I hear Milan at least have some inner city congestion control and planning than most.

    28. Re:Town planning - lack of. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 2

      Yes, I know. Read my second sentence.

    29. Re:Town planning - lack of. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt they would be interested in out of town park and rides.

      When there is no longer the option of "creative parking" - then all that is left would be interest in parking somewhere convenient. Living in European cities I have had to park suburbs away from the apartment, and even then it was a hit and miss affair due to lack of town planning.

    30. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must have been medieval at some point or it wouldn't still be around.

    31. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      The traffic lights in London can be controlled centrally for 24/7. If there is a problem somewhere they can change timings on lights etc. watch this if you can get access to it from where you are.. http://www.bbc.co.uk/britainfr... or read this http://www.london.gov.uk/prior...

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    32. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      One solution, which Copenhagen has adopted, is to reduce how necessary it is to park anywhere at all. If you live in the center, of course you have no need for a car: you can bike, bus, walk, or metro anywhere you need to go. If you live out of the center, you also have no need for a car, because you can bike, bus, or walk to the nearest S-train stop, which by design will not be far away, and take that right into the city.

      As a result of that, plus high taxes on car ownership to further disincentivize it, Copenhagen has 20 cars per 100 residents, less than 1/3 the ratio that Rome suffers.

    33. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you could decide to skip an entire cycle, but that usually wouldn't speed up the traffic flow.

      Looks like the very post you replied to beat you to it:

      You still have the lights timed to allow flow, just don't change if there is not some one actually there, or have the option for a shorter change if there are not many people there.

      And if both directions at an intersection are major enough such that any break from the pattern causes backed up traffic, then it doesn't need to be triggered because then it is a major intersection that always has traffic waiting for either direction.

    34. Re:Town planning - lack of. by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Triggered lights done right should still allow flow along the major route short of some messed up traffic pattern situations. You still have the lights timed to allow flow, just don't change if there is not some one actually there, or have the option for a shorter change if there are not many people there. I've seen bad designed traffic signals in about every country and US state I've traveled too, but I've also seen plenty of well designed ones. It isn't about getting used to one style or another, but about some amount of luck that went into whoever constructed the system and if the municipality ever bothers to do studies and improvements to places after they have been constructed.

      True, they may just be badly designed. It may even be on purpose - lights that I'd breeze through in the week would often stop me in the weekend, oddly enough. Traffic patterns are different in the US than in Europe, however, so it would surprise me if they use the same approach with regards to duration, relative timing, etc. Getting used to the average behavior of lights in a certain place, good or bad, is what I mean by becoming accustomed to the style.

    35. Re:Town planning - lack of. by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Ah, I've never driven that far south, so you could be right in that.

      In any case, there's always hope that as gas becomes more expensive, municipalities will pay more attention to planning for traffic. Europe will have to build higher, and the US more compactly I think. Otherwise I guess we could always move to Singapore, enjoy the growth that part of the world is experiencing.

    36. Re:Town planning - lack of. by zsau · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The European design wastes a lot less petrol than the American design, because you can get around and do a lot without even getting into the car. It is a local inefficiency as a trade-off for a higher-level efficiency. In America, you want to buy milk? You have to move a ton of steel around at homicidal speeds. In Europe, you want to buy milk? You walk for the same amount of time—or less—and you buy it from the shops.

      "Town planning fail" happens when you think that the car is an important and necessary part of modern life. It's not. It's useful that some people have cars; but to think it should be convenient for everyone to drive most of the time is foolishness.

      --
      Look out!
    37. Re:Town planning - lack of. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      As for London being healthier, don't make me laugh. Most of the air pollution comes from diesel vehicles, and those are precisely the ones (e.g. taxis, buses and lorries) which continue to drive in the city. If there's been any reduction, it's due to better engines, not 'we made congestion' tax.

      London is much better than it used to be. London now has the world's largest fleet of hybrid buses, there's a massive charge for brining an old diesel lorry into the LEZ, but unfortunately nothing has changed regarding taxis, and they're by far the worst offender (especially as they drive round or idle while empty for a good portion of their time).

    38. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "out-of-town parking and efficient cheap public transport into the centers"

      Maybe people in Rome would rather park their cars near their homes, rather then an hour's metro ride away? European cities aren't like American cities, people actually live in the city center rather then drive in from suburbs each day

    39. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      Wish I had a handy copy of a picture I took of a bike in Rome. It was locked to a post, but not tightly enough to avoid being run over by a lorry and turned into a banana chair.

    40. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      So with the advantage of planning for automobiles the US has managed to screw up traffic far more than countries that never planned for it at all?

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    41. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All true but only in some European cities. Milk might be a walk away but in general the business districts usually require some non trivial size of the work force to drive in from the suburbs (hence the parking problem reported in Rome).

    42. Re:Town planning - lack of. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Singapore for example with so little space has pioneered high rise cheap parking for all out in the suburbs and electronic pay to enter town centers that really increased the quality of life in the inner city, or so I hear.

      Here you've just shown you dont have a clue what you're on about.

      Singapore is about the worst example you could pick. Owning a car in Singapore is incredibly expensive. You have to pay up to 150% of the cars value when you by it, import duties are 41% and that's before registration and road taxes. For a small car (engine displacement less than 1.6L) you're going to be paying about S$15,000 just to have a car you can drive on the road. Singapore has very few traffic problems because they make owning a car cost prohibitive (there's also a limit on the number of cars the government will register). I pay A$490 to register my 2L car for a year and that's it (but rego is based on weight where I live and my car is light).

      But on the plus side, Singapore has one of the best public transport systems in the world, clean, fast, cheap and connects you almost anywhere on the island. You can live in Singapore and not own a car with no trouble, unlike most Australian cities.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    43. Re:Town planning - lack of. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      you're going to be paying about S$15,000 just to have a car you can drive on the road.

      That's per month as well.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    44. Re:Town planning - lack of. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      ten years on, no one is proposing scrapping or diluting the congestion charge.

      They expanded the congestion charge area in London and then reduced it again (brining it back to it's original size).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    45. Re:Town planning - lack of. by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 1

      Having lived in "HDB land" suburbs of Singapore, I do know that cars are expensive there (in the top ten with London) which is to be expected given the limited space. That does not stop more Singaporeans having a car than the roads can support though (see link).

      However I was talking about the good town planning at least as far as the car park facilities go. For every X HDB blocks and number of residents they have planned and provided a high rise parking facility that is very reasonably priced Vs incomes there. Despite the limited space and ultra high density living you do not need to creatively park out in the suburbs of Singapore. Most European cities with lots more space and room to grow out in the suburbs cannot boast the same - they just do not seem to plan for cars. Madrid, Spain is one of the more egregious examples in Europe that I know of.

      I agree with you on the public transport as well, makes living in Singapore a pleasure. Speaking of Australia, Sydney should be ashamed of itself it has to be the worst city I have ever lived in for commuting by car, and the train system leaves a lot to be desired + no light rail of note (the Darling Harbor light rail is too small to count). Driving to Bondi on a hot afternoon is like taking the road to hell...

    46. Re:Town planning - lack of. by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Singapore for example with so little space has pioneered high rise cheap parking for all out in the suburbs and electronic pay to enter town centers that really increased the quality of life in the inner city, or so I hear.

      They also have to buy a license to own a car which costs thousands of dollars a year. I'm not knocking Singapore's solution but it's hardly shocking that if you charge people thousands to be allowe to buy a car and then again to use the city roads you can afford to buy public parking. They also have excellent public transport as well fwiw :)

      Personally I have no issue with London public transport and the other major European cities I've been to have tended to have good public transport as well. I drove into London this Saturday to Kew Gardens area, the traffic was fine and I could park without paying. I sometimes wonder whether the people complaining about these things actually do it much themselves.

    47. Re: Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe was made hundreds of years ago. They didn't plan for cars because they weren't invented yet.

    48. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      London now has the world's largest fleet of hybrid buses, there's a massive charge for brining an old diesel lorry into the LEZ,

      Speak American you insensitive clod! We don't brine our lorries here. ;) Made me lol picturing this.

    49. Re:Town planning - lack of. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather have no parking at all rather than too much, as then you can at least walk or bike.

      Screw that. It's 10 degrees currently and we're suppose to get 6-8" of snow . I'm not walking/biking in that.

      Maybe that works for you when you shut down the city/town when there's a flurry in the air. That doesn't work here.

    50. Re:Town planning - lack of. by Trulak · · Score: 0

      Hey now, that's not fair. They are very good at convicting Amanda Knox.

    51. Re:Town planning - lack of. by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      The European design wastes a lot less petrol than the American design

      Um, no. We waste absolutely no petrol; we waste gas here in America.

    52. Re:Town planning - lack of. by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      It does seem awfully short-sighted of the Rome city planners to have not provided more parking spaces downtown when they laid it out in the 8th century.

    53. Re:Town planning - lack of. by jwdb · · Score: 1

      We rarely got 6-8" in Belgium, but usually at least an inch or two, and I've biked through that many times. It's simply a matter of clearing the sidewalks and bike path as well, and not only the road.

      Dunno what kind of car you have, but unless it's a truck it probably can't handle half a foot of uncleared snow very well either.

      And 10 F isn't bad, as long as you dress for it.

    54. Re:Town planning - lack of. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      He's saying that it *is* an excuse. Just because he disagrees with you does not mean he's ignoring what you're saying.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    55. Re:Town planning - lack of. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      12,000 USD per *month*?! I could *buy* a lightly used car around here for that same amount!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  5. Busy, Busy World by retroworks · · Score: 1, Funny

    So when I park my Fiat in a parking fountain, should I send a dozen tweets sending the cops to the opposite side of the city? "The solution is dilution".

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Busy, Busy World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      should I send a dozen tweets sending the cops to the opposite side of the city?

      Yes don't worry for your car, the folks from opposite corners of the city will take care of sending its pics.

  6. Staggering 70 per 100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indianapolis has a staggering ratio of probably 150 cars per 100 residents.

    1. Re:Staggering 70 per 100 by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      And your point? Its called freedom. Now, you can get back on the bus.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  7. Number of citations by worf_mo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To put those numbers into perspective: In 2011, 2.5 million traffic citations were filed in Rome, about 45% of those have been paid. In 2012 the number of citations dropped to 2.2 million of which 39% have been paid. (source)

    1. Re:Number of citations by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      Now, a very good question for a non-Italian to ask would be "why on hell do more than half of the tickets go unpaid?"

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    2. Re:Number of citations by Virtucon · · Score: 2

      Because they ticket you for any nuisance thing you can do. It's impossible to drive in Rome or anywhere in Italy and not get a ticket for something. It's a revenue stream because nobody is going to argue against it. Why? We all know how good the Italian Justice system is, right? You'd have a better chance arguing your case in the Coliseum in front of a pride of hungry lions.

      When driving in Rome the old saying "When in Rome, do as the Romans do." applies otherwise you'll get into an accident but then again, you'll probably get into an accident anyway. True Story: When leaving from vacation in Rome and heading to the airport in a hired car, our driver in his Mercedes did a quick lane change and turned left, cutting a car off. We felt a thud and simultaneous crash of glass, the driver shrugged, looked in his mirror and kept driving us to the airport.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  8. I've got a fix for that by pdwalker · · Score: 0

    One word.

    Photoshop.

    1. Re:I've got a fix for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Photoshop is not a concern. Cops don't issue tickets based on tweets. They respond. I.e. they go there and issue the ticket - if the car is still parked wrongly.

    2. Re:I've got a fix for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun in traffic court. Guilty of being able to afford to pay the fine!

    3. Re:I've got a fix for that by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      He obviously meant Photoshop real life :)

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  9. Failure by jamesl · · Score: 1

    2.7 million residents, 1.9 million private vehicles and they got about 30 complaints per day? In the world of social media, that's a pretty big failure.

  10. Wrong ration by mbone · · Score: 1

    ancient city has a staggering ratio of 70 cars per 100 residents

    I don't find that staggering. What I do find staggering is that the seems to be a ratio of about 70 cars per every parking space. Rome is a place where triple parking is pretty much routine.

    1. Re:Wrong ration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ancient city has a staggering ratio of 70 cars per 100 residents

      I don't find that staggering. What I do find staggering is that the seems to be a ratio of about 70 cars per every parking space. Rome is a place where triple parking is pretty much routine.

      Rome has enormous public transportation problems for 2 main reasons :

      - one is that its surface public bus fleet is seriously small for a city that in extension is second to London.
      - building a subway network is very difficult not for engineering problems but for historical problems. The Law makes it impossible to continue an engineering project should you end up coming into contact with ancient Roman ruins. And digging in Rome is a guarantee that you'll end up upon some ancient Roman ruins. So each time you want to build a garage, a new subway station it is a roll of dice. And when the works stops you can't destroy the ruins to continue the engineering project, you are not allow to move the ruins etc... So it all ends un in a standstill for years or decades to come. This is one aspect where fanatical respect for historical ruins is seriously harming any evolution of Rome as a city. Sometimes you need to let go of ancient things to build for the present. And that's not the case in Italy. The past takes precedence over the present. And so you end up in these absurd situations where Roman ruins end up having more "rights" than modern roman citizens do. With the consequence that living in Rome is hell. I can guarentee that no Roman likes living in Rome. Tourists yeah but they only stay 1-2 weeks. Day to day life in Rome is hell. Think Atlanta snow congested caos every single day of the year. It would drive crazy anybody.

    2. Re:Wrong ration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obvious solution is to launch space habitats and never come back. Then the ancient Earth ruins can be left behind for posterity.

      Captcha: mental. Thanks!

    3. Re:Wrong ration by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rome existed for thousands of years before the car was invented. Sorry that they didn't think of savings space for car parks during the bronze age.

    4. Re:Wrong ration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't dig in Rome. Or dig so deep that you won't hit anything, make the subway network nothing but deep tunnels, and site the station access very very carefully.

      Sorry, the history of world civilization IS more important than a new subway station in the present. The past NEEDS to take precedence over the present there. Don't like it? Move to someplace less historically significant.

    5. Re:Wrong ration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been razed to the ground loads of times since then.

    6. Re:Wrong ration by HiThere · · Score: 2

      How do you get from those deep subway tunnels to the surface? Also, since Rome is fairly near sea level, and near the sea, those deep subway tunnels are also going to be underwater. This makes things much more expensive.

      The solution in Roman times was, IIRC, to ban vehicles on the streets during daylight hours. I don't really think you need to ban bicycles, but Rome *is* the city on seven hills, so I doubt that bicycle use will be a popular as in flatter cities.

      Perhaps an elevated railway could be made to work. You would need to design it with light vehicles, so that you would have considerable latitude as to where you placed the support pylons.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:Wrong ration by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      The city center yes, but large parts of Rome are early-to-mid-20th-century monstrosities that suffer for the opposite reason: they were built with the expectation of people driving everywhere, and have poor transit or walkability. Big roads that endanger pedestrians and bicyclists, and encourage people to drive into the city rather than taking another option. The EUR area is particularly bad.

    8. Re:Wrong ration by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Shit, I guess London got it wrong then since they built the Underground and only being about 49 feet above sea level. I mean, right next to the Thames river and all. Oh wait, Rome does have a subway system because even though it's only about 43 feet above sea level at the Pantheon, it's over 15 miles from the Ocean. The big problem with Rome and public transit are public transit strikes leaving everybody without a car trying to get to work. Strikes are such a big problem, there's even websites warning you about them. But there are hundreds of buses and Intercity trains too, so lack of options isn't really an issue there.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    9. Re:Wrong ration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amsterdam and Rotterdam have an underground system too. Both cities are below seal level at the surface.

    10. Re:Wrong ration by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      So build surface transit. Many European cities have large networks of surface light rail (trams) which can transport several times as many people as a bus, and dozens of times as many people as a car. (Zurich, for instance, has over half the population of Rome and NO subways, and is commonly regarded as the world's best city for public transportation, because of its trams.) But Rome has only a handful of tram lines, none of which really penetrate into the central city. Meanwhile there are many multi-lane roads for cars in that central city. Why?

    11. Re:Wrong ration by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the history of world civilization IS more important than a new subway station in the present. The past NEEDS to take precedence over the present there.

      Okay, I'll bite. Why?

    12. Re:Wrong ration by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      GP is poorly worded but it's of course rather expensive to tear down and rebuild chunks of city.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  11. Or, according to spooner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pome Rolice Use Bitter To Twattle Illegal Parking

  12. It's EVERYWHERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see them on the sidewalks everywhere in Italy. And not just one. It's as if the sidewalk and cars were a jigsaw puzzle, and however a car can fit, it goes in. Thank god for twitter in Italy. If only twits where around when I was there: 1945. Or maybe later. I forget now.

    1. Re:It's EVERYWHERE by AuMatar · · Score: 0

      Not just Italy- Greece, Turkey, Croatia, Austria, Hungary, Czech Republic. I can't vouch for anything west of Italy, but insane parking and driving is all over Europe to the east.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:It's EVERYWHERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking it sounded a lot like the last time I went to Michigan

  13. Twitter needs to help the people not the cops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And come to Tel Aviv. It's even more 3rd world here in regards to parking. Yet the cops are on top of it. But they wont touch luxury cars. Only average cars. How's that for a caste system /embarrassed

  14. I'm Wondering by crunchy_one · · Score: 0

    Did this program improve the parking situation in Rome? Doubt it. I'll go out on a limb and guess that it has yielding a tiny bit of revenue that disappears into the noise of what they already collect. But this is Rome, so why not a bit of tech circus for the masses?

  15. Re: by drgs · · Score: 1

    The future of politics will rely on this kind of "user-generated content", like wikipedia, only in real life and everywhere

  16. Hahaha! Fining Italians? by stevegee58 · · Score: 0

    Italy is notorious for its culture of tax evasion and insane driving.
    In a country where almost no one pays their taxes (rendering it unenforceable) why pay fines too?

  17. The solution is obvious by xenobyte · · Score: 2

    Just open up for private companies to tow illegally parked cars and make money (huge fees) from the towing and storage of the vehicles. With hundreds of such companies hunting for illegally parked cars and thus money, the streets will be clear in no time, and all the parking assholes will have learned an expensive lesson. To prevent abuse all towing must be documented using photos showing the parking offense, a copy of which are sent to the offender.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    1. Re:The solution is obvious by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Guaranteed money maker. I had two children graduate from FSU in Tallahassee, Fl. My daughter also got her masters and PhD so I got to experience this four times. The ceremonies are held downtown. This is the state capital so lots of government buildings. On Saturdays the offices are closed but their parking lots are still for government employees only. You have to park a half a mile away and walk by hundreds of empty parking spaces. Paying a fine would be no problem for many but your vehicle is towed so few even try.

    2. Re:The solution is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can accept that people need to park, and set up your laws so that any company doing this finds both their tow truck drivers and corporate officers in prison for car theft.

      Seems like a more civilized solution to me.

    3. Re:The solution is obvious by drgs · · Score: 0

      In a country already known for corruption, they will tow all cars, parked legally or illegally

    4. Re:The solution is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enter the Barrister or QC
      Tow truck drivers are morons. IF you are in time have GF jump on the bonnet or in the car. If they so much as touch her, it is assault and a civil action. If she puts on a performance, rolls and hurts her leg ankles/ dress - HUGE expenses. It they tow with her on or in it, or cause the vehicle to move - another costly move. Video - OMG .
      One Melboure (Vic) .au Tow'er now thinks differently of towing cars outside the Law courts - because thats the law, and a select number of Barristers do enforce things. Once the paperwork rolls, start upwards of 1$$ 0K for the tow truck operator, plus demerit points if not ouright licence disqualification. The good ones slap on an injunction to boot, so he is unemployable for 6 or more months. The common man in the street has little protection - but god help them if they anger a lawyer.

    5. Re:The solution is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To prevent abuse all towing must be documented using photos showing the parking offense, a copy of which are sent to the offender.

      Given the ease with which one can edit photos, why do you think this will prevent abuse? If anything, it would encourage it, as in "Look at this (edited) picture, it shows you in violation, everybody knows pictures don't lie!".

  18. Government getting money != working by arvindsg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The new system, which was created by Raffaele Clemente, Rome's chief of traffic police, seems to be working.

    I would argue if it were working then they wouldn't be getting many such tweets. Perfaps you forget aim is not to give more itations but fewer illegal parkings. All we can say is it might work.

  19. crowd-sourcing of traffic enforcement by mspring · · Score: 1

    ...is the future.
    It's more just: No observers of an infraction, no problem, regardless of the letter of the law.
    I'd just add a reputation based moderation system to supress malice.

  20. Re:And Italy has never had a history of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First of all, I don't think Italy have anyone seeking asylum in Russia at the moment, to avoid "enhanced interrogation" and potentially the death penalty. So much for the scary socialist state, eh?

    Secondly, the point of law enforcement is to enforce the law. If citizens are informing the law enforcement officers when the law is broken, what makes that inherently socialist? Do you come from one of those neighborhoods where you don't talk to the "pigs" because they represent "the man"?

  21. Re:And Italy has never had a history of... by anlprb · · Score: 1

    I think you just proved my point with Snowden. Governments have too much control over people as it is; we don't need to give them more. I think we agree on that. Governments only have control when we want them to. My ancestors and state fought long and hard to throw off an oppressive government and take up the mantle of sovereignty ourselves.

    I come from a neighborhood where people mind their own business, because it is their own. I like my privacy and to be left alone. My neighbors like the same thing. We all agree on that. I don't stick my nose in someone else's affairs because I don't want them sticking their nose in mine.

    Tattling to the police is like running and crying to Mom. The last bastion of those who can't handle that other people do things they don't like and want to punish them with the highest power they can.

    Just because you don't like stereotypes doesn't mean they aren't true and the little old Italian wash woman sticking her nose in other people's business is very well known around me. Italians, on a whole, like to butt into other people's business. It is their entertainment. I know, I have four, off the boat, still Italian citizen, resident aliens in my family. They are great people, but they love gossip and getting into other people's affairs.

    --

    One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
  22. That worked well in nazi germany by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Where nearly everyone spied on everyone else. You never knew who was watching and reporting, so you assumed everyone was.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  23. Photoshop by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    For the the modern joe-job.

    Unless its an actual officer with an issued camera, the picture means nothing.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  24. Re:And Italy has never had a history of... by radish · · Score: 2

    So wait - you think reporting a crime to the police so they can investigate it is "tattling"? What are you? 8 years old?

    You see some thugs mugging an old woman - move along, none of your business. You see someone breaking into your neighbor's house - leave it alone, I'm sure they value their privacy.

    I simply can't understand the mentality that says if you see someone doing something wrong you just let them carry on. Baffling.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  25. 1984 all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one chilled by the rising use of technology combined with citizens to create a self-police state? What next? Jay walking? Dogs with no leash? Spitting in public?

    Will we not be satisfied until everyone has a camera, and they're pointed at everyone else, and every single infraction we all do daily is continually reported until we are all in jail? That's where it ends up, in my purposely exaggerated to prove a point scenario.

    And sorry for posting as AC, but you know...tin foil hat and all that.

    1. Re:1984 all over again by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      There is nothing more dangerous than the perfect enforcement of imperfect laws

  26. Re:And Italy has never had a history of... by anlprb · · Score: 0

    HAHAHA. You don't understand the difference between statutory regulations and criminal law. Go look up the difference between the two and come back and have an informed discussion. What are you 7 years old? -- insults are not necessary. Just become informed of how law works and then we can talk. Here is a hint. Who is the plaintiff in both, what is the burden of proof in both. Who is the injured party in both? How and why? Who brings action against the accused? I never said that when someone is being mugged, you should look away. This is about statutory infractions, not about crime. Understand the difference and we can talk.

    --

    One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
  27. Re:And Italy has never had a history of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just made it more convenient for people to report cars that violate traffic laws and presumably annoy them.

    shees.

  28. The Good Ol days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh I love this story because it reminds me of growing up in Germany in the good 'ol days. Every morning my friend Klaus and I would put on our nicely pressed brwon shirts ( danke mutter!) and go out and report crimes for heir Hitler. Oh we would turn in our friends, neighbors, even our relatives if we had to. Man what we couldn't have accomplished if we could have just done our enforcement via Twitter.

  29. Re:And Italy has never had a history of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tattling to the police is like running and crying to Mom.

    So some douchebag parks your car in, locks up and goes to the opera. No big deal, right? Don't go crying to mama ... be a man! Break a window and push the car down the hill. Works great until someone unilaterally decides you're the douchbag.

  30. I did not know by davebarnes · · Score: 1

    that it was possible to park illegally in Roma. I thought every empty spot was fair game.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    1. Re:I did not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe ant spot next to a sidewalk. Then there is double parking, and triple parking.

    2. Re:I did not know by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      When I was there, I thought that a "No Parking" sign meant "within 3 inches."

  31. Deliberate Misdirection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This can't be necessary or even worth the effort. In a city where double- or triple-parking is common, and just plain illegal parking is the norm, finding cars to ticket requires no assistance whatsoever. So what's the real reason they've implemented this?

    1. Re:Deliberate Misdirection? by Virtucon · · Score: 2

      To make the people feel like their Police/Government is listening to them and will actually do something perhaps?

      But yes, you can stumble 10 feet in almost any direction and find vehicles parked and abandoned all over Rome. What's even funnier are the motor scooters that you know have been locked to that lamentable light pole or bike rack for months and are damaged or covered in 2 inches of dust. It's like the Owner forgot all about them.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  32. Re:And Italy has never had a history of... by mjwx · · Score: 1

    HAHAHA. You don't understand the difference between statutory regulations and criminal law. Go look up the difference between the two and come back and have an informed discussion.

    So regulations can be ignored.

    By the sounds of it you are the one who needs to go and look up what a regulation is and how not following them can become a criminal offence.

    The city of Rome do have a right to determine how people park, it's not a free for all. Above this, think about a persons business and having some arsehole park where customers usually sit/stand or in parking space that business has reserved (read: paid for) for his customers. Because that's where the majority of these complaints are coming from.

    What are you 7 years old?

    I'd say "What are you, 6 years old" but that would be an insult to six year olds, not only do they have a sense of right and wrong you seem to lack, they're also more considerate.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  33. Re:It's EVERYWHERE, Hungary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > Not just Italy - Greece, Turkey, Croatia, Austria, Hungary, Czech Republic.

    As for Hungary, here is a clue. During communism (1948-1989) there was a thing called COMECON. It decided centrally what each soviet-satellite state of Eastern-Central Europe was allowed to do economically. Complaining against silly decisions was pointless, as there were 200k soldiers, 1000 tanks, 400 warplanes and 50 nuke missiles garrisoned by the russkies, in Hungary alone. Anyhow, COMECON has decided Hungary was not allowed to produce cars for private use, but only specialize in making buses (Ikarus Corp.) All cars for office or private use had to come from imports to Hungary, which was never enough. (Czech, Poland, East Germany, Romania, the Soviet Union were all allowed to manufacture cars, but they served their own citizens first and only the balance went to Hungary, which was almost nil). Waiting list with advance payment (!) was 6 years for the junkest east german Trabant plastic car and 8-9 years for a somewhat respectable vehicle, like a russian Lada by Fiat or a czech Skoda. Even in 1989, some 80% of all travel in Hungary was by public transport and only 20% of person-kilometers were done in cars.

    In 1990, communism collapsed in Hungary in an unforeseeable, quick suprise and in two years a huge number of second-third hand cars were imported from Austria, Germany, France. Suddenly cities got filled with old, worn out, polluting cars, causing traffic jams and the road pavements couldn't cope with the load. We still have a beyond terrible pothole situation and our people suddenly became so individualistic, they made a riot when the gov't tried to stop car traffic in the capital for two days, during extreme smog situation. The major of the capital city Budapest ran over and killed a 4-year old kid in 1995, which event made him even more of a pro-car fanatic and our current prime minister is a notorious speedster, who got fined multiple times by police in the neighbouring Romania (where driving fast is hyper dangerous due to almost non-existent road surfaces.)

    There is now a young tram nerd, from a mega-rich family, who literally bought his way to chairmanship of BKK, the unified Budapest public transport management company. He is changing things fast for the better in the capital city (tramline renovations, new buses, GPS infodisplays, etc.), but faces huge political opposition. The government considers all transit riders left-leaning, atheist subhumans and only values the car-riding "good christian" populace. The official GOP party ideology slogan is "Three bedroom [flats], three kids, four wheels", which is supposed to represent the good thing missed under those 40 years of communist oppression.

  34. Private towing by phorm · · Score: 1

    The problem is then you end up with the a**holes being the towing companies. Plenty of issues around here where they've been caught ticketing people who actually still have time on the meter, aren't parked in the area the towing company is responsible for, etc.

    I got nicked parking in a lot that had pay parking at certain hours, but also a sign saying free customer parking. It was fairly ambiguous as to whether it was always free for customers of the mall, pay after 8pm (most businesses were closed but the liquor store etc stay open later) for everyone, or if customers of non-mall businesses were allowed to pay+park after 8pm.

  35. Re:Town planning - lack of. (grammar-nazi post) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 10 degrees currently and we're suppose to get 6-8" of snow .

    Not to nit pick, but I see this often enough that I thought I would correct you. The phrase above should be ". . .we're supposed to . . .."
    I know that, when spoken, the 'd' of the 'ed' gets mixed in with the 't' of the 'to,' but it is still there.

  36. Kinda sinister by captainlavender · · Score: 1

    The government is now outsourcing the reporting of crime to the public. And it's working. Hooray?

  37. What happends to the person that reports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, the person that reports it will have their tweet accoutname revealed online.

    If the person being cited takes revenge on the reporter... Urghhh!!!