Slashdot Mirror


Russia Bans Bitcoin

mask.of.sanity writes "Russia has banned digital currency Bitcoin under existing laws and dubbed use of the crypto-currency as 'suspicious'. The Central Bank of Russia considers Bitcoin as a form of 'money substitute' or 'money surrogate' (statement in Russian) which is restricted under Russian law. However, unlike use of restricted foreign currencies, Bitcoin has been outright banned. The US Library of Congress has issued a report examining the regulatory approaches national financial authorities have taken to the currency."

207 comments

  1. I love the new Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Finally a refreshing alternative to the old green theme. A fresh look and feel.

    1. Re:I love the new Beta! by PGC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In Soviet Russia, Beta fucks you.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    2. Re:I love the new Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can only agree. I was first put off a bit by the beta, but after using it for a while I find it to be an overall improvement compared to the classic theme.

    3. Re:I love the new Beta! by CdBee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They have not yet made an acceptable response. therefore, f*** Beta. On my last few days here unless there is a total and unequivocal reversal of course on Dice' behalf

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    4. Re:I love the new Beta! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, I also like the new beta look.

      Now go ahead and mod me to oblivion because I have a divergent opinion, you "fuck beta" spamming fascists.

    5. Re: I love the new Beta! by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 0

      Slashdot phone app user here. I have no idea why people are bitching about Beta. Slashdot looks the same to me as it always has. Must be a desktop thing.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    6. Re: I love the new Beta! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      On the desktop the front page looks more modern, but when browsing topics I can practically fit the same amount of content into my window as before. I don't see how the beta style negatively impacts my browsing or the usability of Slashdot in any way. This whole beta protest is making me think that a large portion of Slashdot users are close-minded retarded assholes just itching for a reason to troll and spam. As soon as you voice a different opinion not in line with the "fuck beta protest" you get modded to the ground and obscenities thrown in your face.

    7. Re :I love the new Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this finally solves the long-standing problem if trolling, spamming, a-holes on Slashdot because they leave to go elsewhere... then I LOVE Beta.

      Personally, I have no problem with it.

    8. Re:Re :I love the new Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that will never not be a problem on any web forum. I'm not sure what planet you think you live on.

    9. Re: I love the new Beta! by moogla · · Score: 1

      On my desktop you can only fit about half as much content, and it has definitely negatively impacted usability. Also it's missing some key infrastructure changes that should have been top priority that were ignored for making it just seem more modern.

      These are very good reasons to be angry about it.

      Also, you are a cur.

      --
      Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
    10. Re:I love the new Beta! by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Beta, you in a Rush!

    11. Re: I love the new Beta! by colordev · · Score: 1

      mobile.slashdot.org still feels "classic", try it.

      And yes, I hate that Beta-thing too. (Dear Slashdot, bury it soon.)

    12. Re:I love the new Beta! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, as someone who suffered from severe head trauma years ago; resulting in massive deficiencies in both vision and cognition -- i too love beta. (The caretaker is writing this post for me.)

    13. Re: I love the new Beta! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      but when browsing topics I can practically fit the same amount of content into my window as before

      O RLY?

      BTW, in classic I can see your post, the AC before you, your parent's post, your previous post, and 11 one line abbreviated posts above that all in one 1280x1024 screen.

      In beta, your reply here doesn't even show up. Bush is the last poster in the thread. You don't even exist.

      8/10, made me reply. Enjoy a side-by-side comparison while you troll

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  2. Which, of course, really means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...if they catch you running an illegal operation using Bitcoins, the necessary bribe to the authorities just got bigger.

    1. Re:Which, of course, really means... by coinreturn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      ...if they catch you running an illegal operation using Bitcoins, the necessary bribe to the authorities just got bigger.

      And be sure to pay it with bitcoin.

    2. Re:Which, of course, really means... by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      To put it more succinctly: in Soviet Russia, money spends YOU!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:Which, of course, really means... by Thanshin · · Score: 0, Troll

      I fail to see how your point is related to fucking beta in any way.

    4. Re:Which, of course, really means... by wagnerrp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Speaking of libertarians. Where are all the property-is-everything, guns-and-freedom, company-defending people now? My opinion on the beta is, yes, it sucks. But do you guys really think you own this site?

      No. They are owned by the site. They are the product, sold to ad agencies, and the site is the manufacturing facility. The Beta is a new manufacturing process line being constructed, and the complaints are product being rejected by quality control. If the issues are not resolved by the time the new line goes live, manufacturing volume will suffer, customers will not have anything to purchase, and profits will suffer.

    5. Re:Which, of course, really means... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of laws on the books that are just there to trump up charges on people breaking the law. Regardless of what country you are in. I remember a few years back some people robbed a jewelry store, and were charged with (among other things) "wearing a mask while committing a crime". Laws like this are in place to create longer jail sentences for those involved.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Which, of course, really means... by fatphil · · Score: 0

      /me doffs hat - good show, sir /me fucks beta

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    7. Re:Which, of course, really means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BitCoin has its uses, but they seem limited. Unless I play games with wallets, anything is 100% tracable unless people stop processing the whole blockchain (either by trusting someone else or by other means), and we have seen what has happened with "trusted" BitCoin exchanges.

      I don't see anything to use BitCoins for other than the novelty. Virtually anything that can be done with BTC can be done with PayPal.

      PS: I can understand the sentiment. I've been on this site since the late 1990s, and on my second user (my first account used my real name, which I decided wasn't a good thing, so I just used a user from my DikuMUD 1.x days in college. Beta is just plain unusable.)

    8. Re:Which, of course, really means... by jythie · · Score: 1

      There is nothing libertarians hate more then a free market that fails to cater to their specific needs. After all, if the market does not serve them, some sinister force must be preventing it, or other people are stupid (yet somehow in a real free market, the stupid people magically no longer impact it). Just look at all the iPhone hate going on right now... oh no, not a private company doing something that benefits itself and the vast majority of users do not care about! Apple must cater to them and them alone because they do not want to buy the alternatives!

    9. Re:Which, of course, really means... by jythie · · Score: 1

      Well, if the technology itself got wide spread enough, it could really help with fraud and identity theft. Right now with most payment methods you give them your secret numbers and they pull money from your account, thus anyone who intercepts the secret numbers can also pull money out. With the BTC protocol the merchant gives you a secret number for pushing payment in, which significantly reduces the risk of a 3rd party being able to use it to hurt you. That has significant utility for pretty much everyone involved.

    10. Re:Which, of course, really means... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Well, to be honest, this is not a Left or Right problem, this is a problem with not understanding what crime actually is. Wearing a mask, during a crime is not a crime, or even an extension of crime. They added a penalty because it makes it harder to identify the criminals. Boo fucking hoo.

      But people want to punish the evildoers .... so we get crappy laws that make crimes that aren't crimes.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    11. Re:Which, of course, really means... by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Speaking of libertarians. Where are all the property-is-everything, guns-and-freedom, company-defending people now?

      Being libertarian doesn't mean you defend everything that companies do. It just means you think that if Dice wants to treat us like we're irrelevant there shouldn't be a law against it. It certainly doesn't mean those in the community can't express their negative opinion of Dice's behavior, boycott the site, etc.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    12. Re:Which, of course, really means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How else did you expect the bribe to be semi-anonymous?

    13. Re:Which, of course, really means... by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      They are the product, sold to ad agencies, and the site is the manufacturing facility. The Beta is a new manufacturing process line being constructed, and the complaints are product being rejected by quality control. If the issues are not resolved by the time the new line goes live, manufacturing volume will suffer, customers will not have anything to purchase, and profits will suffer.

      Awww, see how you are? You've gone and ruined a perfectly good incoherent rant with senseless rational analysis.

    14. Re:Which, of course, really means... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      ...if they catch you running an illegal operation using Bitcoins, the necessary bribe to the authorities just got bigger.

      In other words: you have to pay them in Russian ruble, based in the Bitcoin amount involved, and THEY get to decide which exchanges rate you will have to use (Hint: they'll pick the highest possible choice, and increase it by a percentage of their choosing)

  3. R.I.P. Slashdot by PGC · · Score: 4, Informative

    May she rest in peace. Slashdot 09-1997 - 02-2015

    --
    The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    1. Re:R.I.P. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding. The original slashdot died sometime in the early to mid 2000s, when the number of teenage commenters finally surpassed the number of adult commenters.

  4. Here we are now by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The introduction of Beta is like a nuclear power plant disaster where the site is currently a ghost town with no real discussion anymore but lamenting souls crying out the pain.

    1. Re:Here we are now by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that a Twilight Zone episode? Maybe Rod Serling will come in at the end with a little narration to tie it all together for us.

    2. Re:Here we are now by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      The introduction of Beta is like a nuclear power plant disaster where the site is currently a ghost town with no real discussion anymore but lamenting souls crying out the pain.

      Really, I'm pretty sure the former residents of Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Fukushima would beg to differ and point out that the beta is nothing like nuclear power plant disaster.

    3. Re:Here we are now by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Really, I'm pretty sure the former residents of Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Fukushima would beg to differ and point out that the beta is nothing like nuclear power plant disaster.

      Save your outrage for sometime in which it is appropriate. Shaking your fist here won't change the fact that Dice has effectively nuked slashdot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Here we are now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The introduction of Beta is like a nuclear power plant disaster where the site is currently a ghost town with no real discussion anymore but lamenting souls crying out the pain.

      This simile is like a banshee who slobbers while whispering sweet nothings into your wet behind the ear while complaining about that ugly ducking that tilts at windmills as he gnashes his bill.

      And now that plutonium just went supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.

    5. Re:Here we are now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Rod Serling will come in at the end with a little narration to tie it all together for us.

      Hopefully on exactly April 1st... when the best April Fool's joke in /. history is unveiled!

    6. Re:Here we are now by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Really, I'm pretty sure the former residents of Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Fukushima would beg to differ and point out that the beta is nothing like nuclear power plant disaster.

      Save your outrage for sometime in which it is appropriate. Shaking your fist here won't change the fact that Dice has effectively nuked slashdot.

      I'm not outraged. While I see some issues with the beta, and have reported them, personally, I'm ambivalent to it. Basically with classic or beta, I can get the information I am looking for.

      I think it's kind of like KDE 4, Gnome 3 or even Unity. People don't like change and they are quick to condemn it (although in fairness the developers of KDE 4.0 said it wasn't production ready). But for all of the hoopla over them, people sure seem to be using them. Change is inevitable and the whole "F*ck Beta" approach is juvenile and ultimately counter productive.

    7. Re:Here we are now by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Change is inevitable and the whole "F*ck Beta" approach is juvenile and ultimately counter productive.

      Change is inevitable. So is death. And in this case the change for the worst seems to be bringing the death of the community.

      Also, I don't think that "counter productive" applies here. This looks suspiciously like a change driven by ulterior reasons; perhaps Slashdot Beta is some Business Genius's personal pet project, perhaps someone at Dice wants to shutdown Slashdot for political reasons, whatever. But in any case the Beta project will go through, a lot of users will leave, the network effect causes a vicious circle that kills the site, and that'll be that.

      So, "Fuck Beta" is not productive, but neither is it counter-productive, since it's unlikely anything could stop Beta and the resulting death of Slashdot. But it is understandable as an emotional response to losing a long-standing and unique community with historical value. So let people went; they're only humans (and scripts and trolls), after all.

      The lesson here is that forums can't be trusted to be sheparded by companies. Forums aggreagate people, who create communities; losing a community when the company inevitably does something stupid is always at least somewhat traumatic to the members, and makes the world as a whole poorer. There's a need for a distributed forum hosting software.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  5. Slashdot bans the will of users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Beta sucks forever. Kill it with fire!

  6. Fuck Bitcoin by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, err, Fuck Beta

  7. We get it you don't like the beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Honestly its been two days can we stop bitching about the fucking beta?

    1. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly its been two days can we stop bitching about the fucking beta?

      • Is it still there?
      • Is it still by design different enough that it cannot be made to do all the things classic can do?
      • Is the plan still to replace slashdot with it?

      If the answers to these questions are "yes", there is a need to continue our picketing.

      This better continue until the site is improved by scrapping Beta as the failed project it has proven itself to be, and until Shravan Goli has been replaced with someone who understands this particular business and why people (and thus advertisers) come here.

      I care about Slashdot. A great deal. So much so that I don't want to see it run into the ground. Which is exactly what will happen with the Beta - it is broken by design, and cannot be "incrementally improved" until it works as well as the flawed system I use now.
      As long as the managers are unwilling to see this, shout it. Shout it louder. Don't let Slashdot die due to someone's pride and a vision of "unified" experience from someone who doesn't even understand that this is a contributor site, not an audience site, and the fundamental difference between the two.

      You have the power to change the site.
      You do not have the power to change the contributors.
      When the two clash, keep in mind what people come here for, which attracts advertisers. Hint: It's not to look at the design or headlines.

    2. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by Cenan · · Score: 1

      No

      --
      ... whatever ...
    3. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by TheloniousToady · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly its been two days can we stop bitching about the [expletive] beta?

      Bitching about the beta actually still serves a useful purpose. It demonstrates that the primary use of the moderation system here is to push personal agendas rather than to objectively rate comments. Objectively speaking, your comment either should be left alone, because your point is obvious, or it should be promoted to +1, because it's valid. However, in terms of the prevailing agenda, your comment actually deserves its demotion from 0 to -1.

      Moderators, thanks demonstrating the enforcement of Slashorthodoxy. I'm not sure whether or not my own comment is orthodox, but if you disagree with me that moderators here push their own agenda, feel free to demote it.

    4. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by PGC · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't get it. Ps: Fuck Beta.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    5. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly its been two days can we stop bitching about the fucking beta?

      No. Fuck beta.

    6. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by AnRkey · · Score: 0

      Ahh, a Dice employee. We found one guys, now spam him to death!

    7. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking noobs

    8. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by fatphil · · Score: 3, Informative

      What Alice Hill, President at Slashdot Media, writes on her Linked-In page:

        Proven track record innovating and improving iconic websites
        (Slashdot.org, ...) while protecting their voice and brand integrity

      She's the one claiming to be responsible for this fuck-up. She's the one who needs nuking from orbit (it's the only way to be sure).

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    9. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      We could all just start using reddit instead. Heck, or go even here: http://www.reddit.com/r/slashd...

    10. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking that doing everything the old site does isn't a feature.

      Being able to link to individual comments and showing your score, replies and a link back to your comments in the user space is important, but things like showing UID i don't think are.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    11. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Being able to link to individual comments and showing your score, replies and a link back to your comments in the user space is important, but things like showing UID i don't think are.

      Being able to tell Bill and BiII apart is useful. Especially if one is a trusted old community member and the other is an impersonator.

      Before removing a feature, it behoves one to ask why it was put in place.

    12. Re:We get it you don't like the beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I see your point, since he was modded -1 Troll, it really wouldn't be pushing an agenda if the mods when through and hit all the "beta" this "beta" that comments as off topic. This particular thread should be a bitcoin shill thread, but instead it's full of beta trolls protesting change in the way youtube trolls protested change by flooding every unrelated topic. Did the Bob the tank protest get any traction, or did it just make everyone miserable until they forgot they were protesting?

  8. Gay? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Russia declares BitCoin Gay!! Who's going to pull out of the Olympics over this one?

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Gay? by rotovator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now that russians have banned bitcoin, Western press and media will rush to praise this currency and write statements about how russians want to destroy the western and are intolerants.

      Western governments might have to admit they want to do as evil as the russians have done regarding Bitcoin or let people escape their monetary control with the propaganda of the "freedom and liberty in the western "

    2. Re:Gay? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia BitCoins gay you!

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    3. Re:Gay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Olympics will surely enjoy it, and BitCoin appreciates the view.

    4. Re:Gay? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I'm going to pull out of Beta, if you know what I mean.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Gay? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, You make Bitcoins gay!

    6. Re:Gay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, the Reverse Cargo Cult. White people also have straw airplanes, only they're better at concealing it.

  9. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And that's why someone like Bruce Perens would be the one with the ability to save us. I would gladly donate some money for a Technocrat account.

  10. Message to Dice about Slashdot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The more you tighten your grip, the more the Slashdot community will fall through your fingers.

    (BTW, we are a community and not "a audience".)

    1. Re:Message to Dice about Slashdot Beta by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      The more you tighten your grip, the more the Slashdot community will fall through your fingers.

      (BTW, we are a community and not "a audience".)

      By definition, you are an audience. Even the banner for slashdot states that it is news for nerds. So, not only are you an audience, you are a targeted audience. A community is a group that holds common values. If you want to propose that slashdot viewers are a community, what are the common values that bind all of the viewers?

    2. Re:Message to Dice about Slashdot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it seems that everyone shares the "Fuck Beta" value :p

    3. Re:Message to Dice about Slashdot Beta by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      The more you tighten your grip, the more the Slashdot community will fall through your fingers.

      (BTW, we are a community and not "a audience".)

      By definition, you are an audience. Even the banner for slashdot states that it is news for nerds. So, not only are you an audience, you are a targeted audience. A community is a group that holds common values. If you want to propose that slashdot viewers are a community, what are the common values that bind all of the viewers?

      I'd say it's because of 'News for Nerds' chosen by Nerds and then commented on by Nerds in a relatively information dense way. Once in a while if you mine the comments then you can learn something interesting and useful. If there isn't anything worth reading you may have a decent opportunity to *write* something meaningful. Like bitcoin mining it becomes more difficult as time progresses and you have to put more energy into it.

      I don't know what slashdot values mean to anyone else, however I know what they mean to me;

      • Information density: I can read it and I don't have to scroll around it too much
      • Minimalistic Design: I turn off ads, it's white, text is clean, few distractions - that makes it great for someone who has to context switch between tasks often
      • Selective: Slashdot is about who is not here as much as who is, pseudonimity levels the feild so that intelligence and stupidity is revealed evenly, moderation make trolls, plebs and morons mute on a Net that has been savaged by mediocrity. It's that 'apparent' mediocrity of the site that drives lazy minds away.
      • Inaccessible: Ok, I mean Elite as in leet or 133t. Yep, it's not facefuck or 4gaychan or other try hard bullshitters. Most news will concentrate on what Snowden or Assange or Mitnick did and maybe why they did. The Slashdot community reveals what, how, why, where and when usually before most News organisations realise it *is* a story. Many memes start their life here.

      Slashdot was what I started reading (lurking) in 1998 and was pretty much my idea of what the Net should produce using this Web presentation layer. Like myself a lot of users here are actually professional geeks and nerds who have found a respectable balance between work and personal interest with /. and get very nervous when the interface gets tweeks or fucked with. I don't think there is a single IT shop in the world that has /. blacklisted and inaccessible.

      I've accepted some of the changes as ok compromises or even neccessary but some of them, even in previous revisions, some changes turned me off. I have been trying the new beta and giving it a chance and I'll probably continue to do so because I value /. enough to give it a chance at least in a way that is more constructive that a single line post that says;

      Fuck beta.

      However I'm only doing so because I was under the impression that the classic view would continue to be available and not forced upon me. Now I see the rumbling that the classic view will not be available, I hope that is not the case. Let me put it this way, Slashdot had reached it's maturity a few revisions ago and it actually takes more energy to read now. After using the beta I'm not certain I can maintain that amount.

      Hey Dice: Why can't you leave the classic view available at least then you won't drive away folk that have been here for a while. The more you change it the less I want to subscribe, every time I go to subscribe you make me less want to by changing it. If you want to derive more revenue why don't you 'Ask Slashdot', Slashdot?

      I will probably participate in the boycott and it will be the longest period in time that I have gone by without reading /. since 1998. But I see dangerously similar parralells to jumping the shark or the Imperial phase of a band.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:Message to Dice about Slashdot Beta by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      A community is a group that holds common values. If you want to propose that slashdot viewers are a community, what are the common values that bind all of the viewers?

      Bitching. Bitching is the common value that unites us. ;)

    5. Re:Message to Dice about Slashdot Beta by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      what are the common values that bind all of the viewers?

      For starters .. how about the near universal hatred of the Beta Site??

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  11. Too bad they didn't ban beta as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Among other problems with beta it is incredibly slow on my phone.

  12. Putin and Beta by Akratist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, guess I'd better use my mods points before they're worthless, huh? Anyway, Russia banning Bitcoin should remind all the Obama-haters and Putin-lovers that Russia still somewhat on the authoritarian side. I've never gotten the mindset that just because Putin likes to stick his finger in the American Empire's eye, that he's a strong supporter for human rights, liberty, etc. I will say that America probably has surpassed Russia in lack of real liberty in recent years (yeah, they'll throw you in jail for exercising free speech, but we're drowning in laws that we often don't know we're breaking until we get arrested and our lives ruined; they have an incarceration rate that is half of ours, etc), but that just means we're worse, not that they're better.

    1. Re:Putin and Beta by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Somewhat authoritarian?

      Isn't that a lot like a little bit pregnant?

    2. Re:Putin and Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, guess I'd better use my mods points before they're worthless, huh? Anyway, Russia banning Bitcoin should remind all the Obama-haters and Putin-lovers that Russia still somewhat on the authoritarian side. I've never gotten the mindset that just because Putin likes to stick his finger in the American Empire's eye, that he's a strong supporter for human rights, liberty, etc. I will say that America probably has surpassed Russia in lack of real liberty in recent years (yeah, they'll throw you in jail for exercising free speech, but we're drowning in laws that we often don't know we're breaking until we get arrested and our lives ruined; they have an incarceration rate that is half of ours, etc), but that just means we're worse, not that they're better.

      This is pure tripe if not spoor.

      Bitcoin can fail on it's own. Even here in the USA, the people who know something about money were warning the mouth-open drooling masses that it is inherently deflationary, supports only non-reversible transactions, suffers from "3rd party spending" (where a 3rd party spends the coin without the first party's knowledge, etc. Sure current currency has issues, but not such a combination of issues that leave the holder of cash in a "screwed consumer" role.

      Of course, the US has decided to blindly disregard all of this; because, there's a gold rush mentality around Bitcoin. Everyone wants to get in, hoping to make a mint, and get out before they're the one holding the bag. The media just plays along, fanning the flames of people's greed.

      Russia banning it does not need extra reasons that rely on personal attacks, or other smear tactics. There is already a good reason to ban them, lots of people will put real cash into something that they were told is currency, yet it acts very much unlike currency.

    3. Re:Putin and Beta by pr100 · · Score: 1

      Not really. Either you're pregnant or you're not. Authoritarian is a much more slippery concept...

    4. Re:Putin and Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true authoritarian.

  13. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    hi bruce

  14. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, it's not over until the fat lady sings. I wouldn't set a death date yet. But I have to say the site is quite messed up right now with all the comments talking only about the suckiness of Beta.

    I do see two problematic things:

    1) They already asked feedback Oct 1, 2013 and didn't listen us. Why would they this time? "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
    2) As you said, the Beta site is currently so far from something usable that they will have a lot of work ahead if they actually want to make it function properly.

  15. Re:they should ban by darrellg1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah I got points and I'm going to dump them all on posts like this. To hell with you Dice bastards voting everything down.

  16. Crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit b*tching about the beta on every freaking post, will ya?

    If you held your governments to the same standard as this here *WEBSITE*, we'd all live in a better world TOMORROW!

  17. This isn't a Beta post by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the '80s Reagan banned Soviet Russia

    1. Re:This isn't a Beta post by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      In 80's Russia, You ban Rayguns!

  18. Pussy Riot joining Putin in ban... by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

    of the beta. The only thing the two of them have ever agreed on....

  19. That is an insult by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Central Bank of Russia considers Bitcoin as a form of 'money substitute'

    That is an insult. Regular money can be made "at will" by banks and the fact that it is only handed to society for usury ("interest") and some real-value things (like houses) as security, makes it drain any society at no cost to the banks themselves. The funny thing is that all banks can create money, but private persons are criminals when they do exactly the same.

    Bitcoins do not come with built-in usury and cannot be made infinitely. Bitcoins do not have built-in discrimination about who can abuse who. Bitcoins are more than a money substitute: Bitcoins make sense. Our current money system does not.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:That is an insult by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Central Bank of Russia considers Bitcoin as a form of 'money substitute'

      That is an insult. Regular money can be made "at will" by banks and the fact that it is only handed to society for usury ("interest") and some real-value things (like houses) as security, makes it drain any society at no cost to the banks themselves. The funny thing is that all banks can create money, but private persons are criminals when they do exactly the same.

      Bitcoins do not come with built-in usury and cannot be made infinitely. Bitcoins do not have built-in discrimination about who can abuse who. Bitcoins are more than a money substitute: Bitcoins make sense. Our current money system does not.

      Money is whatever people use to pay for the exchange of goods and services. In prison, cigarettes are money. When the Europeans first set foot in North America, they gave the natives various trinkets in exchange for goods. The Dutch purchased the island of Manhattan for about $24US worth of beads. Money is whatever people say is money.

    2. Re:That is an insult by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Bitcoins are more than a money substitute: Bitcoins make sense.

      Ah yes, a currency based on wasting electricity makes sense. What color is the sky on your planet, the planet in which you need more emissions to thicken your atmosphere? Because here on Earth, Bitcoin is fucking offensive and stupid.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re: That is an insult by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      We've had sad experience though in some people pulling scams or abusing employees with fake types af money. So we've made laws about what can and can't be used as tender to protect ourselves from these wrongs.

    4. Re:That is an insult by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, a currency based on wasting electricity makes sense.

      What sort of currency does not require energy to create? Include all individuals required in ancillary roles for any given currency in your answer.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re: That is an insult by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      We've had sad experience though in some people pulling scams or abusing employees with fake types af money. So we've made laws about what can and can't be used as tender to protect ourselves from these wrongs.

      Which turned out to be a mistake, because the use of fake-money scams has never been even approximated by anybody other than governments.

      You do know that the Federal Reserve created a minimum of $17 Trillion new Dollars during "the crisis", right? That's the entire productive value of three hundred million Americans working for a solid year. And that's just what they've admitted to under a forced very-partial audit. It's equivalent to a stack of 100-dollar bills from Earth to half-way to geosynchronous orbit. Which counterfeiters do you think could manufacture that much money, such that a monopoly on money given to a private corporation has put us in a better position?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:That is an insult by Threni · · Score: 0

      FTFY
      > When the Europeans first set foot in North America, they gave the natives smallpox
      > infected blankets in exchange for land.

    7. Re:That is an insult by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      FTFY
      > When the Europeans first set foot in North America, they gave the natives smallpox
      > infected blankets in exchange for land.

      No, they didn't give them that in exchange for the land. The land cost $24. The smallpox and the like was for free.

    8. Re:That is an insult by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > Ah yes, a currency based on wasting electricity makes sense.

      So those precious metals deep underground just magically appeared on the surface?
      Those printing presses, dyes, ink, and paper just magically transported themselves from the outside trees, other plants, and/or animals??

      Methinks you need to re-think what you are railing against.

      As I explained before, there are 3 levels to understand what money IS:

      - the exchange of physical things aka barter,
      - a token the exchange of a common unit (physical or digital / virtual) for experience, wisdom, effort and/or time,
      - we have not progressed to the last one: an exchange of energy

      --
      Fuck the /. Beta !
      No thanks, would rather NOT catch bad UI principles!

    9. Re:That is an insult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dollars, in a bank. It's all just numbers on computers these days.

      The "ancillary roles" are only needed if you want to have any kind of sound money policy.

      You could just randomly distribute them to bank accounts based on how much money the owner was wasting on useless electricity-burning rituals if you wanted to, but considering that's just about the most retarded way to do it you could possibly come up with, it's unlikely to become federal policy any time soon.

    10. Re:That is an insult by Entropius · · Score: 1

      It's not a question of whether Bitcoin costs something; it's whether the inefficiencies associated with Bitcoin (the electricity and hardware costs to sustain the network) are more or less than the inefficiencies associated with other currencies.

    11. Re:That is an insult by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      You would prefer one wasting trees or oil maybe one dug from the ground, heating in a flame until liquid and then cooled into bricks?

    12. Re:That is an insult by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So those precious metals deep underground just magically appeared on the surface?
      Those printing presses, dyes, ink, and paper just magically transported themselves from the outside trees, other plants, and/or animals??

      Methinks you need to re-think what you are railing against.

      Methinks you need to work on your English comprehension, or perhaps your understanding of physics. What I'm railing against is wasted energy. When you make paper money, you get paper money which can be exchanged without the assistance of computers. You're spending the energy up front to get something in return. When you use a cryptocurrency which for no good reason uses more electricity than necessary because of its particular algorithm, you're only getting pollution for your energy. You don't actually get ANYTHING for your expenditure.

      There are cryptocurrencies which appear to be as secure as bitcoin which involve less processing. Bitcoin is unnecessarily wasteful, and waste causes harm, therefore Bitcoin is unnecessarily harmful.

      As I explained before, there are 3 levels to understand what money IS:

      I didn't bother to read that bullshit before, because there's only one level to what money is: Something other than barter that people will accept in exchange. It doesn't matter if it's US Dollars or Co-Op hours or cowrie shells. But you're wrong anyway, because every economic interaction involves an exchange of energy. It might be energy already spent, or it might be energy about to be spent, or it might just be the energy that went into the transaction itself. Or it might just be the potential economic energy in money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Beta by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

    They've also banned /. beta. Not everything His Shirtlessness does is terrible.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  21. trollolol Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck beta.

  22. I hear they are going to ban.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot Beta next.

    FUCK BETA!!!!!!!!!

    This is the perfect opportunity for someone to build a new community.

    1. Re:I hear they are going to ban.. by Cenan · · Score: 1

      www.slashdottersinexile.org

      --
      ... whatever ...
  23. How About Some PussyCoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, BitCoin is the new blue jeans? Nothing adds vitality to a culture like a vibrant functioning parallel subterranean economy. How long till small farmers, peddlers, and travelling salespeople get in on it, for real? Then it creeps in and up the bureaucracies, pliklatura, er, poliklatura, and the rest is history.

    1. Re:How About Some PussyCoin? by superwiz · · Score: 2

      No, bitcoin is the new Dollar. Soviet Russia had (at times) a full maximum sentence penalty (15 year was the maximum sentence in SU) for private Dollar trading. They are Ok with people holding dollars now. Now they can dilute the rubles in sync with diluting dollars. You can't dilute bitcoin, so you can expect both countries (and eventually Europe) to start having harsher and harsher penalties for it.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  24. Yay, another Bitcoin story! by Powercntrl · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Seems like every day or so, Slashdot has to remind me how I severely underestimating the stupidity of people when I first found out about Bitcoin. "That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard, who would actually be stupid enough to pay real money for digital coins?", I thought to myself.

    Of course, a metric fuckton of people listen to Justin Bieber, too, so I should've realized a lot of people would fall for this moronic ponzi scam. I'm not sure of Bieber's popularity when Bitcoin was announced, so perhaps that's why it didn't dawn on me at the time.

    But anyway, I'm not making the same mistake twice. I bet the Slashdot beta will be a fucking smash. No, not with the current crowd crowd of users, but with the Bitcoin loving, Justin Bieber listening crowd. Dice will make bank, I'm sure of it. Now, if only there was a way to cash in on this knowledge...

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by PRMan · · Score: 0

      Yep. I'm so stupid to increase my money by 4X in less than a year...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      But anyway, I'm not making the same mistake twice. I bet the Slashdot beta will be a fucking smash. No, not with the current crowd crowd of users, but with the Bitcoin loving, Justin Bieber listening crowd. Dice will make bank, I'm sure of it. Now, if only there was a way to cash in on this knowledge...

      Heraclitus said that "The only thing that is constant is change." Slashdot isn't immune to that, so people have the choice to embrace the change and help make it better or to fight it and be left on the sidelines.

    3. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by gaudior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's only an increase if you convert it to something useful, like real currency before the market crashes. Which it will. Bitcoin wasn't "designed" to do anything useful. It's a science fair experiment. As with many other prototypes, it got rolled into production without any thought whatsoever, and it is causing chaos. I wish the experiment well. Perhaps the lessons learned after the inevitable crash and burn will inform the next digital currency, which may actually succeed.

    4. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by radiumsoup · · Score: 2

      so you've read the white paper, then, I presume.

      You know, the one that described the use case for the design and the foresight and theories of application.

    5. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Yep. I'm so stupid to increase my money by 4X in less than a year...

      No you are stupid to gamble. You will not be so lucky next time.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    6. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin wasn't "designed" to do anything useful

      Obviously you've never had the natural gas lines go out in a cold snap. Standing next to your rack of bitcoin-mining machines prevents frostbite.

      What? You mean we just got lucky and creating heat wasn't part of the design of bitcoin?? Wow, who was so blind that they missed that key feature???

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    7. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I did read the technical description of the protocol with the standard couple of use cases to motivate the work.

    8. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Why can't we just take the existing product that everybody likes and make it better instead of coming up with a new product and trying to make it more like the old product?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    9. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin wasn't "designed" to do anything useful.

      Are you sure you know what bitcoin is? Comments like yours would say otherwise. There is a laundry list of what is useful about bitcoin. To deny they exist is bias or ignorance. You may have issues with it, but that doesn't make your comment true.

    10. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Heraclitus said that "The only thing that is constant is change." Slashdot isn't immune to that, so people have the choice to embrace the change and help make it better or to fight it and be left on the sidelines.

      The only thing that is constant is change, but few rejoice when the end comes. Slashdot might be old and decrepit, but it is still a piece of history from the Internet revolution, and for many of us a long-time companion. Given the personal and cultural significance, the tone of the comments is understandable.

      All good things have to come to an end. Beta is the harbringer of that final inevitability for Slashdot, a reflection of the same shadow we must all face one day. Embrace it if you will, but Slashdot will still move to that great hosting service in the sky when it arrives.

      Altough this do rise some interesting metaphysical questions: do human superorganisms have a soul? We humans certainly talk about organizations, companies and nations like they were persons. Can Slashdot become a ghost? And if so, would it haunt those responsible for Beta? Would it send -1 Flamebait for everyone on their contact list? Would it keep redirecting them to Goatse? Or would they simply be found one morning, petrified and govered in hot grits?

      And how would you exorcize Slashghost? Would you need to get Stallman and Gates to double-team on it? And if you did, who would get the movie rights ?-)

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    11. Re:Yay, another Bitcoin story! by tftp · · Score: 1

      Yep. I'm so stupid to increase my money by 4X in less than a year...

      You can always trade stocks and foreign currencies. BTC is just one kind of foreign currency. However this trading is just speculation; you do not produce anything new in the process, you do not enrich the planet with results of your labor. All that you do is you transfer money from pockets of less lucky (or less wise) people into your pockets (assuming that you are more lucky or more wise.)

      Humanity would thank you far more if you instead use the time to review the existing SlashCode and figure out how it can be served from thousands of mini-servers that Slashdot readers run on their fast connections (fiber, cable etc. are quite common in cities.) BitTorrent could be a starting point for that. One way to do that is to simply mirror the database. The new articles and comments are not posted all that often - maybe one every 10 seconds, and they are small in size. The catch is in ensuring integrity of the content. One way to do that is by signing all comments and posts, and checking for the signature in the browser... using JS. That would be probably one of few, rare as hen's teeth, useful applications of JS.

  25. FUCK BETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck beta

  26. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    until we're confident that the new site is ready

    For very small values of ready, no doubt.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  27. Quaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh how quaint, they are putting laws in place in a single country to govern how things happen in cyberspace, I wish them luck but expect they will have none.

    1. Re:Quaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silk Road happened in "cyberspace", too.
      At some point the money launderers will want to exchange their funbucks for actual money, goods, drugs or murders-for-hire.
      So you go after the exchanges and merchants. So sure, you can always pretend you have money on the internet, but what good will it do you in the real world?

  28. Re:they should ban by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Yeah I got points and I'm going to dump them all on posts like this. To hell with you Dice bastards voting everything down.

    Smart. Encourage Dice to get rid of the Karma and point system. That will benefit everyone.

  29. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    If you feel so strongly about this, why do you hide behind the anonymous coward?

  30. What would Ronald Raegan do? by Nightbrood · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe he would say, "Mr. Gorbachev tear down this beta."

    #IamSlashdot

    1. Re:What would Ronald Raegan do? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Mr Khrushchov says he will bury beta!

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    2. Re:What would Ronald Raegan do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry can't resist:

      Nancy Reagon would say: "Just say no !" :)

    3. Re:What would Ronald Raegan do? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ronald Raegan? Who is that? I only know Ronald Regan. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  31. crazy and spiteful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw you, chump chopper!

  32. Positive effect of Beta by jbeaupre · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a serious benefit of Beta you are all ignoring. Productivity around the world is increasing due to people preferring to work instead of reading Slashdot.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Positive effect of Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      actually my work is suffering, because I cant stop reading all the beta comments

    2. Re:Positive effect of Beta by computersareevil · · Score: 1

      If Beta stays and "classic" goes away, the Nerds That Matter will have so much free time practical cold fusion will be a reality within a week.

  33. Example of things to come by Chewbacon · · Score: 1, Troll

    If you can't get "Close and don't show me again" right, then you shouldn't be coding a whole new Slashdot. I see that fucking notice every time I come here and click "DON'T SHOW ME AGAIN" each time. Oh, yeah: FUCK BETA.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  34. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cant login from work but agree with you 100%

    All these "beta" posts are really ruining slashdot. ppl come here for the comments on the articles not to read constant childish "f beta" posts over and aver again by AC's.

  35. Beta set fire to my children by Mark4ST · · Score: 0

    My sons and daughters visited Beta, and we instantly incinerated.

    1. Re:Beta set fire to my children by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Did you file a bug report?

      A reliable repro would help, too. Got any more kids?

  36. Movin on Down (with DIcE)! Beta Sucks. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The new site is not "movin on up". It's more like movin on down, a step backwards. /. aint broke so dont fix it.

    Dice, I am protesting the beta site. I will not follow any links from a beta redirect and I will not participate in any meaningful discussion.

    You speak of a wider audience, who is this wider audience? Oh, I get it. You aren't satisfied with 3+ million registered users and now you need to attract the clueless likes of the Popular Science crowd.

    Judging by how badly your idiot design team mangled (putting it lightly) the comment section, you are COMPLETELY CLUELESS of what Slashdot really is. Its not a news site and we aren't an audience. Its a community driven site in which users submit content and we can discuss it gaining insight, expressing opinions or have a good laugh. The comments are why we come here. The main page is also an ugly mess. Many of us are mature adults with a professions, some of us are students and everything in between. But one this is for certain: we like text. We don't need pictures or videos or other useless web 2.0/HTML5/Social glitz. Just give us links to the content. That is why I am a daily /. user, its simple and to the point. This isn't twitter, Digg or Facebook, we come here to get away from that. You will lose more members than you will ever hope to attract with your new and unimproved design. Please abandon your attempts to cash in on /.

    Fellow /.'ers, join me in this protest. Do not post a comment related to an article or click any links. Instead, post a comment in protest of the beta design. Mods (who wish to participate in the protest): Mod up protest comments comments only. Do not mod down on-topic comments as it isn't fair to the poster.

    1. Re:Movin on Down (with DIcE)! Beta Sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new site is not "movin on up". It's more like movin on down, a step backwards. /. aint broke so dont fix it.

      Dice, I am protesting the beta site. I will not follow any links from a beta redirect and I will not participate in any meaningful discussion.

      You speak of a wider audience, who is this wider audience? Oh, I get it. You aren't satisfied with 3+ million registered users and now you need to attract the clueless likes of the Popular Science crowd.

      Judging by how badly your idiot design team mangled (putting it lightly) the comment section, you are COMPLETELY CLUELESS of what Slashdot really is. Its not a news site and we aren't an audience. Its a community driven site in which users submit content and we can discuss it gaining insight, expressing opinions or have a good laugh. The comments are why we come here. The main page is also an ugly mess. Many of us are mature adults with a professions, some of us are students and everything in between. But one this is for certain: we like text. We don't need pictures or videos or other useless web 2.0/HTML5/Social glitz. Just give us links to the content. That is why I am a daily /. user, its simple and to the point. This isn't twitter, Digg or Facebook, we come here to get away from that. You will lose more members than you will ever hope to attract with your new and unimproved design. Please abandon your attempts to cash in on /.

      Fellow /.'ers, join me in this protest. Do not post a comment related to an article or click any links. Instead, post a comment in protest of the beta design. Mods (who wish to participate in the protest): Mod up protest comments comments only. Do not mod down on-topic comments as it isn't fair to the poster.

      It seems that well-reasoned comments like the parent would be much more effective in showing your distain for the beta version. At least, if you felt like plastering a message on each article, they could be messages like that one. It would make it seem less like digital temper tantrums and more like people having actual discussions of merit.

    2. Re:Movin on Down (with DIcE)! Beta Sucks. by clubby · · Score: 1

      I was an avid /.'er for a good decade and change before wandering off for a while. I've been popping by to lurk, but hadn't posted a comment in years. This beta thing is really disturbing. I thought I could always come home to Mother Slashdot. I thought /. was invincible. I thought it would Always Be, that it could not be undone, that the mutual gravity we all create would bind Planet Slashdot together forever. I forgot that there are Stupidity Supernovas that can scatter our electrons far and wide.

      It looks like that's probably going to happen, but let's try to coalesce afterwards. We'll create a lot more light as a star than a nebula.

  37. Vladimir Putin = Alpha by Onymous+Hero · · Score: 1

    Betas all get banned in Mother Russia

  38. Interesting Analogy by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    While we can all agree this is a money move, Dice will not bank on the Bieber generation while corrupting the Slashdot name.

    The attention span of a goldfish is already catered to ubiquitously on the internet. There is no end to mono-brow entertainment.

    High brow, intelligent forum discussion is the endangered species here.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Interesting Analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, as a serious question: Is there any place on the internet that still generally has relatively-washed-masses making relatively-logical discourse about... well... interesting things? Or a place where the signal-to-noise ratio is at least pretty high? I would appreciate information about such a place.

  39. What's next, banning ... by davidwr · · Score: 1

    ... cigarettes?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  40. I guess it's reasonable. by Maxus+Atom · · Score: 1

    If it's against the law, then sure, go ahead and ban Bitcoin. What they're missing is that anything can be turned into a currency. Take Valve Software's Team Fortress 2 for example. It has an established economy based off one single currency, the Scrap Metal. People invest actual money in this currency in order to buy games off of Valve's Steam service, as well as other Team Fortress 2 items. If you're going to ban a digital currency like Bitcoin, you're going to have to ban the other digital currencies as well. When you get down to it, everything is a barter economy, and people are going to find other standard currencies.

  41. Excellent -- slows the US down by redelm · · Score: 2

    Russia banning Bitcoin will have relatively little effect on the use of Bitcoin there since enforcement is highly selective and not dependant on established law.

    OTOH if Russia bans it, the US (and its hangers-on) will have to think twice about banning Bitcoin. Heaven forbid the old foe gets it right, and first. Absent strong motivation, the US does not want to be seen as supporting Russia, particularly not ideologically on some matter of principle.

    1. Re:Excellent -- slows the US down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wat

  42. A missed opportunity by PGC · · Score: 1

    Here would have been an awesome feature for beta: and edit button. 02-2015 = 02-2014 of course.

    --
    The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    1. Re:A missed opportunity by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Here would have been an awesome feature for beta: and edit button.

      One of the best features of Slashdot is that what's said remains said. You can make a new account and start over, but you can't take credit for the good while editing away the bad.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:A missed opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Just put in versioning for comments. Show the edited comment but allow people to see the edits. This is nothing new, other sites have done it for years.

    3. Re:A missed opportunity by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Still, a 5 minute edit window isn't going to hurt anyone.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:A missed opportunity by tftp · · Score: 1

      The edit window should be configurable in Preferences. Once you click "Submit" the comment is posted ... but only for you. You can see it in the context, reread it, change if necessary... (editing restarts the timer.) Once the timer expires, the comment is posted for everyone.

      This would be a function that is available ony to logged in users, since it's much easier to follow the identity with a cookie. AC comments are published instantly, and they cannot edit them (because they cannot be easily linked to their comments.)

      This would be a great example of an improvement that can be done within the Classic UI.

  43. This is what I'm loading next week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what I'm loading next week: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/slashdot.org

    1. Re:This is what I'm loading next week by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      At least until that site is sued into oblivion. We've seen in the past where fans kept alive a disposed of product that was far superior to the current product. In most cases, the company trying to monetize their new pile of junk sues to get the superior previous version killed.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  44. Incredibly slow on my choppy internet by davidwr · · Score: 1

    When my Internet gets "choppy" and starts dropping more than 1-2% of packets, most "non-simple" web sites including /. slow down horribly. Simple ones slow down tolerably.

    This is one reason (accessibility for the blind is another) why all web sites must have a "simple" version for those who need it.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  45. Banks making money "a will" by davidwr · · Score: 1

    That's a stretch. Most banks can only loan out x% of their deposits, limiting the amount of money the can create "at will."

    I don't know about Russia, but in America, private people can still loan each other money at interest and they can demand collateral, subject to certain regulations and limitations. As a simple example, if I want to loan my neighbor $1000 at interest of 0.1%/week (i.e. far below "illegal usury" rates) so she can pay for unexpected car repairs, my government isn't going to stop either of us from making that transaction.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Banks making money "a will" by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      No it's not. That is a common misconception. What happens with a loan is a "mutual debt". Your bank gives a promise to pay (NOT money!) against your promise to pay the loan with interest. Only if you want the real money instead of passing the numbers around, the bank will have to use "its" (its customer's) reserves. There are laws in some countries that say the bank has to make sure it has the lend-out money after two weeks, in which case the bank loans it from a central bank, which has no obligation at all to anybody. So banks really create money and do not lend it out from some sort of stock. It is said that only 3% of the money is real and the rest is just made up by banks. But that number is from a few years ago.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    2. Re:Banks making money "a will" by davidwr · · Score: 1

      What you say only makes sense if I'm depositing the proceeds of the loan with the same bank.

      If I'm buying a car and the dealership banks elsewhere, there's no real economic difference between me taking out a $20,000 cash withdrawal, handing it to the car dealer, and having him deposit it in his bank vs. me having the $20K wired directly to the car dealer's bank account. Because there is no real economic difference, it would be irrational to have different reserve requirements for these two transactions.

      I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just saying that if you are right, then there is something very irrational going on here.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  46. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG. Something on the Interwebs is going to change. Everyone panic.

  47. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    driven away against our will

    So go then. Why are you still here? There are plenty of other sites where you can post your naive self-important claptrap. Bitching over a layout redesign is so Facebook 2012. Move on. Yes, there is a subculture here that thinks they can win arguments with bullying, and have no interest in the bigger picture outside their own tunnel vision, but if those guys leave then the community will improve, not get worse. So go, if you're going. And if you're not going, then shut the fuck up with your whining already.

  48. Re:they should ban by fatphil · · Score: 1

    If it's going to die, the quicker they kill it, the less painful it is, as long as there's a Perens or an OkianWarrior, or whoever, to provide a substitute.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  49. A ban? What ban? by trole · · Score: 1

    The linked official press release simply reiterates that bitcoins are getting more wide use including criminal use. That the bitcoins are not legal tender. That bitcoins are not backed by anything or anybody but speculative interest and that bitcoin holders are not afforded legal protection of their property rights in respect of their bitcoin investments. Is the word "banned" being misused here?

    1. Re:A ban? What ban? by davek · · Score: 1

      The linked official press release simply reiterates that bitcoins are getting more wide use including criminal use. That the bitcoins are not legal tender. That bitcoins are not backed by anything or anybody but speculative interest and that bitcoin holders are not afforded legal protection of their property rights in respect of their bitcoin investments. Is the word "banned" being misused here?

      From the translation:

      In accordance with Art. 27 of the Federal Law "On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation", "the official currency (currency) of the Russian Federation is the ruble. Introduction on the territory of Russia and other monetary units issue money substitutes is prohibited. " Certain distribution received anonymous payment systems and kriptovalyuty, including the most famous of them - Bitcoin are money substitutes and can not be used by individuals and legal entities.

      I'm pretty sure the ruskies would have a strict interpretation of "can not be used by individuals." Sounds like it's a ban.

      I'll be interested to see if BTC can hold above $500 at the end of the day.

      --
      6th Street Radio @ddombrowsky
  50. FUCK SYSTEMDEEEEEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    f systemd

  51. Buggy by tom229 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It's not bad, but it's buggy. I'm using it on my phone right now and every time I try to mod you up it sends me to the home page. It also seems to only load the comments successfully about half the time.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  52. It's a kleptocracy by MarkvW · · Score: 2

    Banning Bitcoin will make it much easier for the kleptocrats in control to take their cut.

  53. Re:they should ban by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    If it's going to die, the quicker they kill it, the less painful it is, as long as there's a Perens or an OkianWarrior, or whoever, to provide a substitute.

    Why would a Perens or an OklanWarrior want to mess with this whiny group of people? All that can be surmised is that if they did do it but not do exactly what slashdotters want they will get flamed and runned into the ground, too.

  54. Re:they should ban by fatphil · · Score: 1

    I don't know, why not ask them. However, the fact that Perens has done this before implies that he does see a need for such a community. And OkianWarrior has a good backing of us ranters too.

    Anyway, we're not whiny, we're loud and obnoxious, there's a difference. We were whiny between 6 months and 3 days ago, while beta was just this thing they were dicking about with. Whiny was useless.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  55. Re:Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone. by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

    I think we should mark yesterday, February 6, 2014, as the day that Slashdot died.

    Yesterday may be the day that the coroner declared the victim to be dead, but the fatal disease was contracted when Dice.com bought Slashdot. Slashdot is a vibrant community built around a tainted well, and Dice.com is the entity that poisoned that well.

  56. Most importantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..banning Bitcoin will protected those doing nothing and fucking up everybody else. As in "New York screwing up the world".

    Given that CIA and NSA are rooted in banksterism (read their histories), bet that Bitcoin will be banned in the US, too.

  57. If only the real world worked like your fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go fuck yourself.

  58. Jerry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jerry, about this makingeanonymous, positive comments bit, I'm having a little trouble here. I can't tell if I'm in IM, or Beta. Can you help me out?

    1. Re:Jerry by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      Okay, mod parent troll. I had my fun. Yes, I suspect astroturfing no, I don't know it's true.

      Yes, I cannot use the betas or the mobile site with my phone.

      No, I loathe JS.

      Yes, it appears dice is going to take a massive hit because no, they won't back down, and no, they don't understand the concepts in the book "the tipping point".

      No, I suspect nothing can replace it, but it appears slashdot is dead. No, there's really nothing else I want to see discussed here, which means soon I'll get tired of this and leave.

      Bye.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  59. Alice doesn't work here anymore by Svartormr · · Score: 1

    As I believe was pointed out in other comments, I think Alice Hill no longer has any association with Slashdot. In other words, she's an early adopter of "FUCK BETA". >:(

    1. Re:Alice doesn't work here anymore by fatphil · · Score: 1

      I have plenty more bile, don't worry.

      Fuck Gaurav Kuchhal the fuckup, Head of Product at Slashdot.
      http://www.diceholdingsinc.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=211152&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1781836&highlight=

      That press release still mentions and quotes Alice Hill the fuckup. However it positions here clearly in "DICE" rather than Slashdot-anything.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  60. US will ban if they can't tax it by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    If the US can't tax it, they'll ban it. Right now the IRS goes after every source of personal income, whether it was earned in the US or in any other sovereign nation. Think about that. You're a US Citizen living outside the US. Any income generated by you is subject to US taxation even though you may have not earned the money in the US and you're not living there. So if Bitcoin can't be tracked and taxed, ultimately the US govt. will ban its use because it goes contrary to their money-sucking dreams.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:US will ban if they can't tax it by spacepimp · · Score: 2

      Say I mine for silver as a business in a big plot of land, zoned to make it legal. I mine tons of ricks and those rocks have lots of silver in them. I let the rocks stay as rocks as long as i want. Can I be taxed by the IRS on the amount of silver in the rocks that sit in a pile? The silver amount hasn't been realized. They are a pile of rocks (raw material). They have no value until i separate the silver. The silver can be stored in a closet. It has no value until it is realized as a form of currency or traded/sold off. The IRS can tax me off the money made selling the silver or jewelry made off the silver. But they cannot tax me off the rock sitting in my backyard.
      Bitcoin has no inherent or realized value until it is used for a transaction. If i sell the bitcoin for USD then i can be taxed. If I use it to purchase a Tesla Roadster it can be taxed (the roadster purchase). The IRS cannot tax a bit sitting in a digital wallet until it's value has been realized or transacted upon.

    2. Re:US will ban if they can't tax it by tftp · · Score: 1

      Here is my view on it. I am not a CPA, so do not take this to IRS.

      Goods cannot be taxed before they are sold. Your rocks with silver are safe. You may have them registered as inventory, or as raw product, or anything in between, but until your business sells them for MONEY you do not owe tax.

      That would be the same case with BTC. However recently the US Government acknowledged that BTC is MONEY. This means that once you receive a Bitcoin in your possession, you may owe tax on the profits (if there are any) from the transaction. A BTC is not a potential money anymore, it is money now.

      This means that when the USA acknowledged that BTC is money it was a setup intended to bury BTC in regulations and taxation (that is nearly impossible to do.)

    3. Re:US will ban if they can't tax it by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Usually, income taxes in the US are on actual dollars made, and producing or acquiring something with the intent to sell it in the future is not taxable. If you start using some other sort of currency to buy and sell stuff, then that does become taxable. If you sell some good or service for BTC and convert it into cash, that cash is taxable, but not necessarily the BTC. The IRS will get its cut when you convert the BTC to cash. If you sell something for BTC and then buy something with that BTC, then the IRS isn't getting its cut of your income, and they will want it. I don't know exactly how they'll go after it, but I never bet on the IRS failing to get most of what it goes after.

      And, yes, the IRS can tax bits in digital wallets as they come in. My salary is paid by having a bank or banks reduce a number in one account and increase a number in another, with nothing tangible going on. The IRS insists that I pay taxes on those bits.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:US will ban if they can't tax it by mysidia · · Score: 1

      However recently the US Government acknowledged that BTC is MONEY.

      Someone in the US government thinks BTC is money.... that probably means more than anything: they don't understand what BTC is.

      What's interesting about BTC is you don't "own" coins.

      You own bits on your computer where you have stored a copy of a private key corresponding to a public ID.

      The public ID is recorded as having "coins" assigned to it; much like if you have a username on a World of Warcraft server, the server has a database record that says your username holds a certain number of warcraft gold tokens.

      In both cases.... BTC peer to peer network, and world of warcraft, you don't "OWN" the coin value.

      The remote server, in the case of WoW; or the Peer to Peer network in case of BTC, comes to an agreement that certain wallets have a certain number of tokens.

      Any assignment of a number of coins is a technical matter, due to the operation of the distributed system.

      Not a legal matter

      For example: if an admin in WoW comes and sets your account's world of warcraft gold to ZERO, You have no recourse, No theft has occured. (Because you never 'owned' a balance of gold, even though your player had it, and it was removed by no business transaction you authorized)

      If another Bitcoin network user manages to guess your private key, and submits a spend entry setting your Wallet balance to ZERO, then you have no recourse, and no theft has occured.

      (Because you never 'owned' a balance of bitcoin, even though your wallet had it, and it was removed by no business transaction you authorized)

    5. Re:US will ban if they can't tax it by tftp · · Score: 1

      That's a curious theory, on par with Slashdot Beta.

      What's interesting about BTC is you don't "own" coins.

      You need to define what you think ownership is, and then compare it to ownership of other items that we commonly call money.

      The public ID is recorded as having "coins" assigned to it; much like if you have a username on a World of Warcraft server, the server has a database record that says your username holds a certain number of warcraft gold tokens.

      Well, I don't own the servers at my bank. There is nothing in this Universe, other than virtual association of some monetary units with the number of my bank account, that says that I have money on my account. But you wouldn't say that I don't own the money that my bank holds for me, would you?

      Some more strict debaters may say that no, I don't own that money; it's just the bank has a debt to me, payable on demand. But from every practical point of view (that excludes high-flying economists) I do own that money. What is the test for ownership? I guess it's quite simple. If I may have access to it at any time, and if I can spend it in any way I want. I guess the money at the bank satisfies that test. BTC in your wallet is also technically owned by you because you are free to spend them on anything you want, or to destroy (by deleting the wallet.) There is no authority other than you who can do it (aside from the 50% attack.) If you ask any IRS agent, any lawyer, any judge they will tell you that you own a thing if you exercise full control over it. The duck test, if you wish.

      I cannot say what laws govern in-game toy money, but most likely they are just game items that you collect during the game. As long as they are not declared money, or other goods in real world, they are just part of the game; you cannot call the police if a demon of 34th rank jumps you and robs you of all your gold.

      BTC is declared to be money, for better or for worse. This means that it is now regulated as money. You'd better declare BTC that you hold in foreign accounts, and pay tax on all your BTC income. Welcome to the club of big boys, BTC. And, by the way, the big boys don't like you at all, and the system is biased against you. Such is life.

    6. Re:US will ban if they can't tax it by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't own the servers at my bank. There is nothing in this Universe, other than virtual association of some monetary units with the number of my bank account

      You own a legal claim to the deposits you made with your bank. Their computer/"virtual association"/books are just an automated accounting system that documents how much in claims you have Versus payments made.

      If I may have access to it at any time, and if I can spend it in any way I want. I guess the money at the bank satisfies that test.

      You might be able to cause a spend. The network design says you should be able to, if the public ledger denotes a token association. There is no counterparty that has guaranteed this to you.

      There are various situations in which you would not even be able to enter a spend. One example is: local network or electrical outage.

      There is no authority other than you who can do it (aside from the 50% attack.)

      A 50% attack is an example of an authority you would have no recourse against, who can do it. You can't cast that aside, because it can really happen ---- there is no reason to believe that it would be unable to happen in the future.

      If you ask any IRS agent, any lawyer, any judge they will tell you that you own a thing if you exercise full control over it.

      The fact is; while you control the private keys, you don't control the bitcoins.

      As long as they are not declared money, or other goods in real world, they are just part of the game; you cannot call the police if a demon of 34th rank jumps you and robs you of all your gold.

      Indeed.... and the same applies to Bitcoin. Just a toy currency that is part of a virtual game environment.

      As with World of Warcraft gold..... a valueless entry in some virtual ledger that can vanish on the whim of some miners, Of no value on its own. But in some cases, you may be able to persaude some fool on eBay to part with cold hard cash for it.

      Just like you can sell WoW gold and WoW characters.

    7. Re:US will ban if they can't tax it by tftp · · Score: 1

      You own a legal claim to the deposits you made with your bank. [...] You might be able to cause a spend. [...] There is no counterparty that has guaranteed this to you.

      Actually, deposits under $200K (IIRC) in US banks are insured, so you can say that there is a 3rd party who guarantees that your money are safe. There is no such guarantee with BTC, and no recourse if your Bitcoins are stolen (that had happened already.) This alone makes banks valuable: they, at no cost to you, insure your spending.

      There are various situations in which you would not even be able to enter a spend. One example is: local network or electrical outage.

      Those are basically acts of God; they are so rare that nobody in the modern society is worried about them. When was the last time you couldn't withdraw money because of local power outage? This may be a problem after SHTF, but everything will be a problem at that time. The Bitcoin does not fare any better, actually, because the bank may have a diesel generator; but what percentage of Bitcoin network is independent from the grid? That includes communication lines, of course. If anything, I'd expect banks to recover far faster than the BTC because individuals will have far more serious needs on their hands than to be a BTC node.

      The fact is; while you control the private keys, you don't control the bitcoins.

      May I have an example when I, an owner of a BTC wallet, know the password but cannot control the bitcoins? (Outside of a SHTF scenario, of course.) It is true that a 50% attack is a possibility... but a very remote one. Once someone gains control over the decisive portion of the network, BTC will be effectively dead. You can have far more concern about the crash of conventional currencies - especially because such crashes periodically occur all over the world (like every few years.) Those are not scenarios that play out in normal operation of the currency (like loans, payments and transfers.) We should focus first on how the currency in question operates in peace time. Only after that we can look at how it reacts to unusual events. (Most of currencies fail right away, with exception of precious metals, such as lead, brass, silver and gold.)

      Note that "control" does not have to include everything under the Sun. You may own your car, but it's stuck in the snow and you cannot drive it. Does that mean that you don't own it anymore? If someone steals your car from that snow bank and drives away, he is now in control, though he has no right to be in control. You are now only legally an owner; but as matter of fact the thief owns the car because he can do anything he wants with it, and you cannot. If you control the wallet with BTC, you control those Bitcoins as well (unless the wallet has a mind on its own, which is fairly rare these days.)

      Just a toy currency that is part of a virtual game environment.

      Ah, but that's not for you or me to decide. It's for the GOVERNMENT to decide - and it has decided that BTC is money. Period. They have authority over such matters.

  61. BTC Price Drop by Wintywasthere · · Score: 1

    BTC seems to have dropped quite a bit today, but IMHO it's more likely to be because Mt. Gox has 'temporarily' halted withdrawals rather than any news coming out of Russia..

    http://www.coindesk.com/mt-gox...

    1. Re:BTC Price Drop by mysidia · · Score: 1

      BTC seems to have dropped quite a bit today, but IMHO it's more likely to be because Mt. Gox has 'temporarily' halted withdrawals rather than any news coming out of Russia..

      If you look at the price charts on bitcoinity.org..... the Mtgox chart shows a much larger dip than the btce or bitstamp.

      The price of BTC needs a pullback though. The network hashrate is really growing at too big a rate, and the Ghash pool even threatens to exceed 51% of the network size.

      We need for some of the folks mining and manufacturing mining equipment to go bankrupt --- for the network to shed excess heat and become more efficient and stable over the long run.

      The "get rich quick" mentality needs to go away.

      It would help if the price of a BTC dropped in exchange rate to about $10 US, and then remained pretty stable for about 6 months.

      That would make Bitcoin more viable as a currency.

  62. And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the GNAA's opinion of the beta is?

  63. Why are people commenting about beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article somehow get mistaken for a slashdot beta article? Can you please post your comments somewhere more appropriate. Also this news concerning russia banning bitcoin is irresponsible in that we are still not sure what the hell russia is actually saying. From what ive gathered since i heard it yesterday. This pretty much means nothing.

  64. bitcoin is an exchange mecanism by DrYak · · Score: 3, Informative

    Indeed, bitcoin is a protocol used to push around numerical value (which are counted is bitcoins, BTC).
    Your IRS or any other tax service shouldn't tax bitcoin, just the same way that they don't tax your paypal account (as is litteraly putting a tax on the e-mail address itself) nor (for a more extreme metaphore) put a tax on your credit cards (litteraly taxing the actual bit of plastic with a "Visa" or "Master card" logo on them).

    Bitcoin protocol is a mean to exchange value (except that you don't directly push around any official currency, but instead you push BTC around and convert to/from BTC using exchanges, payment processors, etc.)
    This is exactly the same as paypal is a service used to do online payment, and as a credit card is a mean to do payment.

    At the end of the day, a merchant using BTC as mean of payment, will exchange them to a local currencies (USD, EUR, whatever is here around) usually in a completely automatic manner (using a payment processor such as coinbase, bitpay, etc.)
      So at the end of the day, a merchant will make revenue in local currency (USD, EUR) and that what the merchant has to declare as a revenue:
    the flow of USD/EUR/etc. going to the merchant's bank account. The tax service shouldn't give a fuck is that money was conveyed using paper money at a cash register, or using commercial centralised payment methods like PayPal or MasterCard, or a distributed crypto-currency as bitcoin.
    What matter is at the end of the day, a merchant made XXXX USD/EUR and has to pay taxes, social charges, inssurances, etc. from this amount.

    Also, to the poster above: please stop spreading the disinformation that bitcoin can't be tracked. In fact, the whole security principle of bitcoin lies on the exact opposite: every single transaction is broadcasted to the whole network, so every single node is able to verify it.

    The closest thing the bitcoin protocol has is "pseudonymity". Identity of parties in a transaction aren't directly disclosed in the clear:
    - it's not 'Mr XXX, living at adress AAA' has sent bitcoins to 'Ms. YYYY living at BBBB'"
    - it's more like 'account [public key 1]' has sent bitcoins to 'account [public key 2]'
    On the other hand, if Ms. YYYY happens to be a merchant, she has the name and address of Mr. XXX and can map it to a public address. Government have enough ressouces to do such mapping on a large scale and completely remove any anonymity.
    But you're shielded from your neighbours accidentally discovering that you spent money at a sex-shop.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  65. Beta Hater Redux by fictionpuss · · Score: 2

    I found the response acceptable. I find your self-righteous power-trip mob-raising rebuttal more objectionable. Enjoy your last few days here, and I'll enjoy each day after that.

    1. Re: Beta Hater Redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's people like you that suck corp dick for free then bitch about why your lips hurt. fuck beta

  66. And step 3? by azav · · Score: 1

    No profit.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  67. Sorry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No time for shitcoin.

  68. FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHO!? Who the fuck is designing this piece of shit comment system? It looks like a fucking blog from the 90's designed by a brainless ape. If you can't do better than this you should do the designing world a favor and quit.

  69. wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many bother to click the ads, or have adblockers? So losing users isn't going to hurt them based on 'ad' revenue..

    If you were a simple internet user, and a company making money from users lack of adblocking knowledge, this makes sense. Your talking about /. users, who are pretty tech savvy and learn quickly from articles posted, so I would say an overwhelming majority use some type of ad block.

    In theory they could flood the site with anti-blocking ads, if they were that concerned with it !!

  70. Re:they should ban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should extend it with a 6th point, which needs 3 upvotes+ to raise it about 5.

    Also I want to be able to download all my posts and some of the thread they're in.

  71. "Suspicious" by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    Like gay people being constantly hounded, hunted, and attacked by vigilante groups ?

  72. Re: Timothy confirms Slashdot Classic will be gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u do realize the people who hate beta are the actual nerds and geeks who pretty much run this site. if we all leave then slashdot becomes another buzz feed. the guys you are telling to leave are the ones with the best comments and expertise on the issues. so no slashdot will not be a better place without them. it will become much worst and I fear your narrow tunnel vision prevents u from seeing this.

  73. Cryptocurrency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making a cryptocurrency illegal is completely going to encourage it to begin trading in daylight.

    Honestly, they are probably afraid that bitcoin might supplant the government's carefully controlled script, and take away their power to keep the peasants in-line.