Slashdot Mirror
White House Takes Steps Against Patent Trolls
itwbennett writes "The Obama administration on Thursday launched a website with information to assist people and businesses targeted in patent lawsuits or receiving patent demand letters. The White House also announced that it would launch a new crowdsourcing initiative focused on identifying prior art (evidence of existing inventions) that the USPTO can use to reject bad patent claims and will expand a USPTO patent examiner technical training program by allowing outside technologists to help with the training."
You mean something like patents.stackexchange.com?
I heard that the White House is also full of the world's top geneticists and they are breeding superheros.
How dare you take away Obama's slush fund project!
Nope. Maybe you should take a look before opening your yap?
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
I guess the President's corporate sponsors have figured out that patent trolls are an expensive nuisance.
So Obama's going to go after patent trolls while pushing for international trade agreements that will allow the biggest corporations to use IP laws to further crush competition and keep regular people poor. Typical.
I'm furious with myself for ever having supported that guy.
You are welcome on my lawn.
this is Bureaucratic solution, and it is is not a solution
He could start by telling the Patent Office to stop rewarding examiners based on issuing patents and more on the quality of decisions.
Prior Art is now irrelevant, because we've switched from "first to invent" to "first to file."
It doesn't matter who invents it first anymore, and therefore prior art is irrelevant.
Why "nope"? Stackexchange seems like a great (crowdsourced) medium for exactly this. Already a patent application has been struck down thanks to prior art discovered via that site.
On the one hand we have patent trolls, and on the other we have a large fleet of drones armed with hellfire missiles. Seems like somewhere in the middle should be a solution!
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
Ask Patents was created at the behest of the USPTO. Presumably they get some financial support in exchange but the USPTO is self-funded so no slush fund adventures are needed.
I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
Originally patents were for 13 years with one renewal by the original Person that applies and copyright was for 17 years with one renewal by the original Person that applies.
Go back to that and all the problems disappear.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
They need to do something about Apple and Microsoft...while not "trolls" in the strict definition of the word (since they do actually make things), they are still 2 of the biggest abusers of the system!
From TFA:
My new business plan:
1. File completely bogus patents
2. Wait for them to expire
3. Sue everyone!
BRB, patenting this business model...
Increasingly lawless and corrupt, the Obama regime is taking steps against everyone whether they have the authority or no.
an ill wind that blows no good
There are other such sites as well...
http://www.crowdsourcing.org/n...
http://www.patexia.com/contest...
Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
What it is about is placating all of the ironically-mustached hipster-faggots and fat chicks with pink hair and thick-rimmed glasses who think they're coders because they wrote 5 lines in Ruby, who are starting to feel a bit disenfranchised by their votes for Grand Dictator Baraq Hussein Sotero.
" Legalize marijuana? Ha! Fuck you! Clemency for Snowden? Ha! Fuck you! Oh, fine, I'll give you one...something about patents because your pirated music video was taken down from YouTube on the prompt of a DMCA request, and hoping to patent is the only chance in hell your fantasies have at getting you rich since there are no real jobs for you all living in your parents' basements. "
Did you see that last paragraph above? Grand Dictator-for-life Baraq Hussein Sotero really, really said that after the cameras stopped rolling and the mics were shut off, but you all are too stupid and thick-skulled to read behind the lines.
--Ethanol "fuck beta -Fueled
http://www.whitehouse.gov/share/patents
Of course the USPTO is aware of this as mentioned in their 2012 press release...
Here's an excerpt from the WH press release...
Today, the USPTO is announcing that it is exploring a series of measures to make it easier for the public to provide information about relevant prior art in patent applications, including by refining its third-party submission program, exploring other ways for the public to submit prior art to the agency, and updating its guidance and training to empower examiners to more effectively use crowd-sourced prior art.
The mere collection of this information, although important, is not what is being addressed here. The USPTO has a complex procedure in place to insert 3rd party information into a patent file for consideration by the examiner. Basically you can only submit other patents or papers (no explanations, analysis, comments, instructions, protest or wild-ass-diatribes allowed). There is also a time window, specific forms and a submission fee and a requirement that the submission be directed at a specific pending patent and limited to 10 items.
Of course the examiner is somewhat free to consider third party resources (like AskPatents), but they are often leery of doing so as third-party participation in the examining process is strictly regulated by statute. AFAIK, this is because examiners aren't supposed to consider pre-publication protests or other opposition in determining the validity of a patent application, only technical information, not opinions of others (like competitor companies or people with axes to grind).
Hopefully, this initiative will streamline the process of getting them relevant technical information w/o the inevitable chaff that tends to go along with crowdsourcing sites. Just because a document gets uploaded to a crowdsourcing site doesn't mean it's a legitimate document. Some people have an agenda, ya know...
Why "nope"? Stackexchange seems like a great (crowdsourced) medium for exactly this.
Maybe he was implying that a web site from the Obama administration would be more like healthcare.gov, not exactly great or useful.
and right wing trolls continue to try and poison people against the democratic party
no lie is too outrageous for a desperate gop
That would be rather inconsistent. Isn't the first lady's big thing getting sweets banned?
...no ban on intuitively obvious software patents? No ban on trivial business process patents? No legal fees to victims winning lawsuits against patent trolls? Sounds like more political theater to me.
I can't decide if that's a great point or off the mark.
The patent office bureaucracy has approved a bunch of bad patents.Improving
that bureaucratic process may well improve the results. On the other hand:
We can not solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them.
Albert Einstein
Perhaps a bold, strong new leader at the patent office who did a lot of new things, including soliciting public comment, could make a big difference. Someone like Robert Gates, for example, could probably greatly improve things without any fundamental changes to the underlying law. Just ACTUALLY deny patents where there is prior art, etc.
Nope. Maybe you should take a look before opening your yap?
Kindly put down your ideological/political biases for a moment... as sibling mentioned, the site is a perfect analog for what Obama is proposing.
From what I see, I find it strange that the President would have his staff put out a website, instead of, you know, trying to talk to the Senate about putting something forward to rectify the patent mess. After all, his party does dominate the Senate side of Congress, and I bet it wouldn't be that hard to get folks from among the opposition to join in. What, you ask? Glad you asked: For instance, there was once a rule that you had to present a working physical model of your idea to the USPTO before it could be patented... so why not reinstate that?
Hell - he doesn't even need to involve Congress: Why not issue an executive order to have the USPTO define a patentable idea as something with a physical basis as a critical portion of the proposed patent. Why not have the USPTO put an automatic 18-24 month hold on all inbound software patents? Lots of options open to him... but a website that someone else has already implemented to do the same thing? Makes no sense, and has a danger of diluting the whole reason for having such a website in the first place.
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
and stagnating innovaton, say it aint so...
by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
It's unfortunate that the USPTO's new director and the White House are not taking aim at patent trolls specifically, but rather trying to deal with them by revamping the criteria for patentability in general. Patent trolls are bad enough that they ought to be treated as a first class problem. Even if it became next to impossible to patent prior art, trolls would still end up getting such patents and prevent companies from building things until they pay up. Maybe something like "You can't file a patent lawsuit unless you have a legitimate product based on the inventions described in the patent."
I was joking obviously, but no, that's simply incorrect. She outlines her agenda in a document about 20 pages long entitled "summary of recommendations". You'll notice the word "food" appears four times as often as the word "exercise". In fact, she mentions "screen time" as often as she mentions exercise.
Her agenda items include "the federal government should pursue actionable items [to create] food boards ... set food policy". Whether you agree with her or not, her stated mission is to have the federal government decide what you eat and what you don't, see to it that you eat healthly food. Maybe that's what Washington should be doing, maybe it's not. It's absolutely what Mrs. Obama is seeking to have Washington do. Go read her web site.
"the federal government should pursue actionable items [to create] food boards ... set food policy"
That means things like "Public schools shouldn't serve pizza and french fries every day". Mine did. It does not mean "Pizza should be banned from existence".
You know, a few years ago it was kinda "unheard" of that the major corps would go at each other for patent issues, due to a sort of weird MAD scenario. Everyone would cross-license and be done with it. But with the latest rounds of patent cases, you'd think the companies would start hiring small armies of researchers to not only investigate entire portfolios of their competition, but also their competitions' applications for new patents.
If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
http://blog.prevalent.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/10-steps-to-improve-the-patent-system.pdf
So they basically went for a "feel good" solution with ZERO teeth that's only purpose is to duplicate functionality in the patent challenge space already fulfilled by other, better run sites that DON'T have to deal with government bullshit and won't fold the second a sufficiently large donation is made?
Yup. That's pretty much OhBlahBlah's entire presidency in microcosm there.
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
1. Technically qualified personal should review patents for technical things
2. Lawyers should review patents for legal things
3. More than a single person should review scientific parts
4. Don’t ignore any source of prior art
5. Force common vocabulary where possible
6. Make clear where the invention starts and ends
7. Pay attention whether the invention really is technical
8. Same money for applied and denied patents for the patent office
9. Make the patent office liable for bad prior art research
10. How many steps of concatenation make up a ‘new invention’?
You can download the complete paper here: http://blog.prevalent.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/10-steps-to-improve-the-patent-system.pdf
I find it ironic that you're calling people stupid for not falling in line lock in step with corporate culture because they've been brainwashed by the media owned by that corporate culture.
It's not just right wing trolls. Moms, Dads, the Postman, the old lady down the block, everyone hates the Democrats. Don't feel bad though, they hate the Republicans and don't trust the Libertarians and righteously so. These are all people who claim to want to serve the country, but wind up serving themselves from the sweat of our labor, kind of like we are livestock. Meanwhile, a media, hungry for exclusives (or just not wanting to be left out for competition reasons) will relate any bullshit the politicos want to fool us back into being peaceful livestock.
So YES, EVERYONE HATES THE DEMOCRATS (except for the most foolish swine).
DUH!
*Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
I see your point, but I gotta agree with others, given the success of the Healthcare website or the pockmark of the petition website, I don't hold out much hope for a government organized anything. The man has been in office 5+ years, if he is successful in this, it will only be the second thing he has EVER done that makes a desireable difference for the people. Getting off the ridiculous Marijuana mantra would be the first. At least we can start keeping dangerous offenders IN prison instead of putting them on probation to make bed-space for potheads. This has taken HOW MANY YEARS, since it was made illegal to satisfy the paper and cotton industries of the early 20th century?
Two things in 5 years and I'm still can't my breath on either.
*Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
hold, hold my breath...
*Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
They have the temerity to ask the public to combat the effects of a completely rampant patent system they created themselves?
In effect, they're telling you "please do the work the patent office should have done in the first place". Real nice.
"The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
Hey, so they want to make another site just like https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/ with the same level of support, feedback, and quality of response, correct? /sarcasm>
Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
I don't think you know the meaning of the word "really". It implies a fact. When your post is a hate-fueled diatribe of gloating over some self declared win that only you can perceive, it really takes any chance of doing anything other than alienating people whom, I'm guessing you'd like to see your point of view, and flushes it away. Perhaps...and this is just a thought, you may not want to insult those with whom your opinions differ, tone down your rhetoric so you at least appear to not be a sociopath and troll, and actually add something to the conversation instead of typical right wing propaganda. Spelling the name of the person with whom you politically disagree is plainly childish and makes you seem like you are too stupid and thick skulled to read.
It is a pity voting (in our system especially, damn math!) results in 'who do I hate the least?' decision making.
If you're going to spew garbage at least make it hard to disprove.
Benghazi is a sovereign country, and it's rather hard to investigate there. On top of that we know the group that incited the violence and that they did indeed use the video to get more people to join.
NSA point is dead on
Obamacare screwed up the launch, prices were going to rise anyways, in fact rate of rise went down.
He's issued fewer executive orders than his predecessors and Congress themselves declared that they weren't going to do anything to work with him. In fact Congress was the least productive Congress ever. To get anything done, he HAS to go around them.
People in Mexico are dead from cartel violence and a botched operation. Yup it was a screw up. Sometimes that happens. No the whistleblowers shouldn't have been punished. Blame the cartels for the violence and the death, blame the administration for the failed operation.
Do you really think someone legally obliged to keep secrets can, in open session, tell the truth? Of course he was going to lie. He would go to jail otherwise.
I don't have to think you're stupid. I know it.
It's not just right wing trolls. Moms, Dads, the Postman, the old lady down the block, everyone hates the Democrats. Don't feel bad though, they hate the Republicans and don't trust the Libertarians and righteously so.
Where the hell do you live, that your family and neighbors are all so keenly aware? Everywhere I've been, you have one big group of drooling idiots who treat their party like a friggin' sports team and never put any thought beyond what some PR drone tells them to think. I want to live where you live.
School lunches are a big part, yes. Also her proposals include things like having the FCC limit advertising of foods that the government considers to be suboptimal choices. There's a lot of food related stuff, more food related than exercise related.
Personally , I think the local school should serve healthy food. I'm glad that decades ago the FDA started putting out guidance, suggestions, that assist local school districts with healthy menu planning. I don't see any need for local citizens to pay $10,000 in taxes to Washington, who takes their cut before sending $7,000 to the state, who takes their cut before sending $5,000 back to the local area. Federal bureaucracy to buy lunch is just silly.
It's also the local dieticians who are best able to work with local needs and tastes. Here in Texas, kids will eat burritos, they won't eat fish and chips. I bet in Massachusetts it's the other way around. Federal bureaucrats making more menu decisions for local schools isn't going to work too well, I don't think.
He does good things, and the you bitch?
Obama could buy everyone in America free donuts and this site would find a way to complain about it.
Obama could buy everyone in America free donuts and this site would find a way to complain about it.
Free donuts may cause weight problems and increase health care costs.
Also how will dunkn donuts compete with free donuts being handed out by the government, think of the job loss.
Perhaps we need price supports for the oat farmers to compensate for lost revenue.
Who gets to decided what type of donut? Do beignets count?
Are there going to be no-bid contracts awarded for the making of donuts?
Unionize the workers, or make companies involved with donuts implement new federal contract minimum wage of $10.10/hr.
Need a have USDA work on a standard grading scheme for donuts (analogous to catsup).
Must appropriate money to revise the recently revised USDA "competitive food standards" disallowing most donuts provided to school children (even if free).
Are GM ingredients being used?
What type of fat? Corn-oil? Lard?
Are they Kosher? Are they Halal? How do we respect all religions? Are "noodlie" appendage donuts allowed?
What about gluten free? Are we discriminating against these people?
Can't use red sprinkles, they are made from bug parts (think of the vegetarians and vegans).
How about the sugar, is it real sucrose, or HFCS, or *gasp* one of the artificial sweeteners that cause cancer!
Government contract should specify the used oil be recycled for alternative fuel vehicles.
1000 page bill needs to be passed w/o reading followed by 12M words of regulations need to be generated by the executive branch...
How to reconcile this policy with Michelle's Let's Move initiative?
Maybe the 1% should pay for their own damn donuts...
Yeah, these are a few reasons why the government shouldn't get involved with give-aways (donuts or otherwise).
Sometimes the government should just do less...
The USPTO does not provide a single link for inventors or companies who have developed and patented technology to defend their rights. Not one. These types of entities deserve some sort of guidance as well.
> You have no idea what you're talking about.
Then you're trying so hard to defend stupid that you've made yourself dense.
According to your link, US citizens send $2.9 trillion to Washington, who sends $500 billion to states, who send $100 billion back to the same localities it came from.
If that seems like a good idea to you, I've got something you'll love. I'm sure you'll get excited about this. You send me$1,000 and I'll send $250 of it to my wife, who will send $100 to you! Yay, you get $100! I'll pm my address to you.
I don't dislike the democrats. With Republicans, the number of forclosures would have been 20 times worse. Republicans would have let the car industry die, then let the employee. benefits be wiped out,and then purchase the remains at ten cents on the dollar.
Its too bad that the Republicans blocked most of the best legislation in Congress.
It is too bad that lobbyists representing big financial interests sway the lawmakers to vote partially.
Yeah but together they've driven us to the brink of shit over the last century. Who did what is kinda irrelevant, because what one doesn't the other will given a far too short amount of time . So therefore their assumptions about foreign policy, economy, Nat'l debt mean shit as well. Everyone who isn't focusing on their shoelaces and can see past the horseshit fed us,is waiting for the levy to break.So what can I say kind about either? Not a fucking thing. Maybe I hope they get leprous syphilitic sores on their internal hemorrhoids. But, I'm a humanitarian.
*Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
A vote for M.Mouse, Bozo T. Clown (who incidentally got the most votes of all in the 70s/80s) J.R.Bob Dobbs and others is a vote your conscience will give you a beer for later.
*Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
Oh, just get in your car and drive where houses are only one or two stories and don't look alike. The rest are just Hollywood sets for Movies and Nightly News programs.
*Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!