Slashdot Mirror


UAE Clerics' Fatwa Forbids Muslims From Traveling To Mars

PolygamousRanchKid writes "The Khaleej Times of Dubai reports that a fatwa committee has forbidden Muslims from taking a one-way trip to the Red Planet. At the moment, there is no technology available that would allow for a return trip from Mars, so it is truly a one-way ticket for the colonists, who may also become reality TV stars in the process. The committee of the General Authority of Islamic Affairs and Endowment in the United Arab Emirates that issued the fatwa against such a journey doesn't have anything against space exploration, Elon Musk's Mars visions, or anything like that. Rather, the religious leaders argue that making the trip would be tantamount to committing suicide, which all religions tend to frown upon."

33 of 363 comments (clear)

  1. Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't want to go to Mars? Please by all means, keep your bullshit on Earth and let us evolved human beings make a fresh new life on a fresh new planet without you!

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shut it, Mars. We know what you did to Spirit.
      Now you're gonna pay.

    2. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you move to another country and never return, did you kill yourself? Why can't we live on Mars?

    3. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lack of food, oxygen, and liquid water. Maybe it will be possible someday, but not now. This fatwa was discussing doing it now, possibly as part of the one way mission to mars that was discussed, which was a complete suicide mission.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Again, how is this really different from any other colonization project? Look at the history of colonization in the Americas, and you'll see that many died out entirely as a result of being unprepared for the environment that they encountered. I suspect that you'll see similar results in the history of colonization into Australia, and if records existed, for pretty much any migration into areas where humans had not been before.

      The general idea would be to find a way to draw the O2 out of the rust initially, and supplant that and the nitrogen we need from supplies sent from earth. Not cheap by any means, but then the colony would be working to grow plants to recover the O2 from CO2. Some water would be brought from Earth, but some would be recovered from ice on the planet. And food would be one of the other reasons to grow plants.

      I'm not saying that the colony would survive. I wouldn't plan on giving even 10:1 against, but presumably we would learn things that could be applied to help the next colonization attempt. But then I'm not expecting the described mission to happen either. If it does, great. If it doesn't, hopefully another will before too much longer.

      --
      You never know...
    5. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by JustOK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Life is a suicide mission

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the current plans for sending people to mars have no such plans though. They want to send people with no plans of sending any supplies and no plans of sending the necessary life support systems in the first place. Sending a resupply mission would be a major project, and lead times of 6 months to 2 years depending on orbits can make things difficult. With colonization they may had a high chance of death, but they were travelling places with plenty of fresh air, water, and food. Most of the deaths were due to either disease or disagreements with the locals. Many died of malnutrition. But they still had the intentions of living, those who are planning the current Mars trip have no such intentions.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Immerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, why bother with the rust at all? You've got all the 98% pure CO2 you could want in the atmosphere, just pressurize it and get some plants breathing it and you're good to go on oxygen. And assuming you can find a source of hydrogen you'll have all the water you need without too much trouble. Perhaps they could somehow capture the methane plumes we've detected and burn them in the same greenhouse? If you're producing enough oxygen, turning some of it into more CO2 and water would seem to be a good trade, especially if you have a use for the extra energy produced.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Immerman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come now, don't be such a pessimist, over half the humans who ever lived haven't died*, you gotta like those odds.

      *depending on you definition of human. If you include homo erectus the ratio is no doubt somewhat smaller..

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Khalid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please stop this fatwa unsanity !

      The muslim word is full of stupid jerks who use religion and the beliefs of other people to serve their own agenda, while pretending speaking in the name of Islam. This is not different from a stupid christian priest who give his opinion about a a society matter, they only represent themeslves.

    10. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now, this is a hell of a pipe dream: there is no soil on Mars in which you can grow plants. You would have to bring it with you or produce it locally. Neither is easy. Plus, you have to grow enough plants that their O2 output is sufficient to keep the air breatheable. This means you need to plant on a big surface area, which means big greenhouses with a huge surface area through which they will leak heat (its way below 0 degree Celsius on Mars, too cold for most plants). So you need to provide a lot of energy for heating to make this work. If you do this only for the O2 output you're much better off pumping the energy into some chemical conversion process.

      If you can grow enough food using the same plants, it's another matter. However, I am not aware of any successful experiment that was able to keep a closed, small biosphere sustainable for a longer time. This is another damned hard problem.

    11. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Predictable environment conditions, yes. Unfortunately, they're predicted to be "fucking crappy".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by mrclevesque · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Mars has a much more predictable environment, so the risk of death should be much lower."

      A vat of boiling oil has is also a more predictable environment.

    13. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by MisterSquid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Again, how is this really different from any other colonization project? Look at the history of colonization in the Americas, and you'll see that many died out entirely as a result of being unprepared for the environment that they encountered. I suspect that you'll see similar results in the history of colonization into Australia, and if records existed, for pretty much any migration into areas where humans had not been before.

      Can anyone in 2014, with a straight face, write that the Americas and Australia were places where "humans had not been before"?

      Such statements don't withstand the scrutiny of someone with even gradeschool historical knowledge, yet here we are having to chew on a +4 comment that forgot humans were in these places well before Europeans got it into their minds to begin displacing indigenous peoples.

      Imagine a colonization trip to Mars that discovered humans who had been living on Mars since before recorded history. These indigenous "Martian" humans then sheltered and fed those of us who traveled from Earth, receiving as thanks a colonist-driven campaign to kill them and appropriate their resources AND THEN two to three hundred years later the colonizers "recalled" how exceptionally difficult it was to colonize Mars, a place where no humans had been before.

      While the likelihood of finding indigenous humans on other planets is unlikely, one day our descendants may encounter extraterrestrial indigenous life forms and, with thinking like the kind exhibited in your post, would destroy those life forms, appropriate the liberated resources, and write a history that enshrined themselves as resourceful adventurers struggling to survive in a harsh "unlivable" environment.

      --
      blog
    14. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The muslim word is full of stupid jerks who use religion and the beliefs of other people to serve their own agenda

      All theist communities are like that. Actually, that's what theism is about in the first place! The sooner we get rid of this crap, the better for everyone.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  2. Let it begin! by MPAB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cue witty jokes about blowing oneself up not counting as suicide.

    But they should also forbid being born, as everyone that does will die eventually.

    1. Re:Let it begin! by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

      As you might have guessed, Fatwa's aren't really laws as much as they are rules that may or may not be followed depending on whether an individual Muslim wants to.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  3. Buddhism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "the trip would be tantamount to committing suicide, which all religions tend to frown upon."

    Hey get your Judeocentric religious world views out of here! Buddhism goes so far as to feature a story of the Buddha himself committing suicide just to feed some hungry tiger cubs.

    Which is insane like all religions, but I reserve the right for their insanity to be characterized accurately!

    1. Re:Buddhism by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Informative

      I assume he's thinking of this tale.

  4. @Al Kai Da - RTFF - Read the fucking .. by burni2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. Fatwa

    Stop blasting yourself into pieces, it's forbidden,
    and no your chance to survive is below the mars mission.

  5. Hold the lines by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't see many religious people lining up for an expedition to discover if life evolved on another planet. They still don't believe that it evolved on this one.

    1. Re:Hold the lines by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you're confused, most Muslims and most Christians have no problem with evolution.

  6. Shouldn't he issue a Fatwa against Smoking? by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After all, Tobacco leads to the premature death of most people who use it.

    I always thought of suicide as the act of killing yourself just for the sake of killing yourself. While one might call something a "suicide mission", that is not the same as suicide, is it? If a soldier stays behind to man a turret in the face of certain death to provide covering fire so his comrades can escape, is he committing suicide?

    1. Re:Shouldn't he issue a Fatwa against Smoking? by fullmetal55 · · Score: 5, Informative

      actually there already is one

      http://islam.about.com/od/heal...

  7. Re:How is this a suicide? by Firethorn · · Score: 3

    It does sound pretty flimsy as an argument. But keep in mind that current one-way plans to go to Mars really haven't even gotten to the Power Point stage yet. They don't really have a lot of incentive to burn brain power on this. I suspect this is a nice way to say, "please don't fall for these scams".

    I think there's translation issues, but what it amounts to is that the proposed mars journey is not only effectively one way, they're also not hauling enough supplies for you to live the rest of your life.

    So rather than living to ~70 or so minimum, assuming no accident takes you out earlier, you're going on a trip with no real scientific value other than studying how you end up croaking, where your life on mars maxes out at around 3-5 years* from lift-off. You're not fighting a war, you're not dying to save others, etc...

    Would the Fatwa have been issued if the proposal was 'The plan is to visit mars and come back, but we figure the odds are 50-50 that something will happen that we can't make it back, but in return we'll collect all this information that may help explorers in the future'? Maybe, maybe not. There's plenty of hazardous expeditions that Muslims have gone on without having a Fatwa issued against it - scaling Mount Everest, visiting the South/North pole, etc...

    *From what I've seen of the proposal.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  8. Re:How is this a suicide? by erikkemperman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's plenty of hazardous expeditions that Muslims have gone on without having a Fatwa issued against it - scaling Mount Everest, visiting the South/North pole, etc.

    And the ISS, if I remember correctly. There were some issues in determining the direction in which to pray, but those were resolved. Wonder how that would work for Martian Muslims, though.

    --
    Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
  9. Irony by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

    the religious leaders argue that making the trip would be tantamount to committing suicide, which all religions tend to frown upon."

    Brought to you by the religion that also endorses suicide bombers, because some suicides are actually ok.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  10. But... but... by Maritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What if there's a school on Mars that has a girl in it? It's not going to blow itself up now, is it?!?! More short-sightedness from the 'clerics'.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  11. Re:"suicide, which all religions frown upon" by abies · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But the fact that 99.9% of Muslims oppose terrorism doesn't seem to be swaying the terrorists.

    Quotation needed. I think that you are considerably underestimating amount of 'angry Muslims' in the world.
    If you would say 99.9% of Muslims aren't _actively_ involved in terrorism - sure. But oppose?

    Because, again, religions aren't hive minds. Members don't really have much influence over each other, and they have even less influence over people who have already proven themselves willing to kill.

    Now, this is pure BS. Religions are closest thing people have to hive minds (I count cults of dictators, like in NK, as a religion, even if it is not using world 'god'). Religons influence minds of people in extreme ways. Think about Scientists or other strange cults/sects - this is example of religion completely brainwashing the person. Bigger religions are trying to be slightly more subtle, but still, religion is probably best mind manipulation tool ever invented by mankind.

  12. Re:How is this a suicide? by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think that the idea is that while visiting the ISS is 'hazardous', there's a lot of hazardous things out there, the religion doesn't forbid hazardous. What it forbids is outright suicide. Join an expedition to reach the top of Everest without a plan to return? That's suicide. Riding a russian rocket up to the ISS? Let's call it a 1% chance of death. Dangerous, but not suicide. For that matter, sacrificing yourself for others (war, evacuation and such) isn't considered suicide either, even if death is certain.

    As for the Martian Muslims, it depends on which sect they belong to - the simplistic method is simply to pray facing the Earth, but there's something forbidding praying towards the sun(so when Mars and the Earth are on opposite sides...). Then there's the fact that they don't actually use a straight line calculation, they use the shortest route, which means using a circle route on earth... Alaskan Muslims pray pretty much straight north because of that. Also means that you have an actual direction rather than 'into the ground' while on the opposite side of the planet. But when on mars it'd likely be the retrograde orbit to reach Earth.

    Assuming significant colonization of mars by practicing Muslims, I wouldn't be surprised if some leader there just declares a 'Spiritual Martian Mecca' on Mars for them to face when praying.

    Oh, and there's the clarification that if you're spending more worry about which direction to pray in than the prayer itself, you're doing it wrong and that there's an 'any' option in that case. Oh, and you shouldn't change facing during the prayer, even if Mecca is going to pull a 180(start facing towards, end facing away) during that time. Figure out the direction in an expedient fashion(computers are allowed) and pray.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  13. Re:"suicide, which all religions frown upon" by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

    So when these atheist dictators banned religion and went around killing those who practiced it, that was just ONE BIG COINCIDENCE and had nothing to do with their atheism?

    dictator
    1. a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.

    How can you have absolute power when people follow religious leaders, not you? And that claim to answer to a higher authority than you? Dictators suppress and eradicate religion because it's a threat to their power, it's in the nature of a dictator not an atheist. Sharing a religion means you are both working for the same god, you might disagree on the ways and means and goals but you're in it together. Branding it as ateists makes it sounds like we're your equal and opposite, but it's not. If two people go skydiving, they have something in common. If two people don't go skydiving, they still have nothing in common.

    But the fact that 99.9% of Muslims oppose terrorism doesn't seem to be swaying the terrorists.

    Are you lying or just ignorant? Here's an example from a huge study showing that just in Bangladesh is 150 million * 90% muslim * 26% = 35.2 million who think suicide bombing of civilians is sometimes/often justified. In Egypt there is another 85 million * 90% muslim * 29% = 22.2 million people and the same in Pakistan with 180 million * 97% muslim * 13% = 22.7 million. Together that's over 80 million people or about 5% of muslims that DO support terrorism. And a majority of the population in Egypt, Jordan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine and Malaysia want to kill you for leaving Islam.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  14. Re:This from a religion by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is they did read the Koran. It says non believers should be killed. Quite explicitly. Since it is supposed to be god's literal word many scholars have concluded that jihad is pleasing to him. Therefore death as a result of fighting in his name is fine, to be encouraged even.

    Suicide bombing is more contentious, but only in the senses that some people argue against the legitimacy of the war and some argue that it isn't the best way to fight.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. The Emperor has no clothes. by westlake · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Clearing away the brush.

    The Malaysian National Space Agency (MNSA) and its Department of Islamic Development held a two-day conference in April [of 2006]. They invited 150 scholars, scientists, and astronauts to discuss "Islam and Life in Space."

    Five times a day (before sunrise, at midday, in late afternoon, after sunset, and at night), earth-bound muezzins call Muslims to prayer. A spaceship traveling 17,400 miles per hour orbits the earth 16 times in a day. Does that mean praying 80 times in 24 hours?

    If interrupting work to pray is not possible, the astronaut may practice a shorter version of the prayer or combine midday and afternoon prayer times, or the evening and night ones.

    The next problem: Where is Mecca?

    Muslims on Earth face Mecca, in central Saudi Arabia, when they pray. The MNSA suggests that the astronaut pray toward Mecca as much as possible, or at the Earth in general. But if it becomes necessary, the astronaut may simply face any direction.

    How does an Islamic astronaut face Mecca in orbit?

    The conference went on to discuss a broad range of concerns. To sum up: The rituals of the Islamic faith are meant to focus the believer's attention on his relationship with his God. They are not an exercise in puzzle-logic and they do not require a geometric or technological solution.

    Moving on.

    In January 2014, former German astronaut Ulrich Walter strongly criticized the project for ethical reasons. Speaking with Berlin's Tagesspiegel, he estimated the probability of reaching Mars alive at only thirty percent, and that of surviving there more than three months at less than twenty percent. He said, "They make their money with that [TV] show. They don't care what happens to those people in space...

    Mars One

    Captain John Smith ran a tight ship and had no use for the Virginian colonist whose plans were based on magical thinking and not careful planning, adequate material and financial resources and a rigorous internal discipline.

    He published a list of supplies he believed to be the minimum requirements for survival on the frontier: essentially a year's supply of all consumables and durable goods, and allowing for a generous margin of safety.

    New France saw one or two supply ships a year, which may give you some idea of the expense. New France, remember, had an economically viable export trade in furs and unflinching support from the crown. Those ships would be coming, hell or high water. Other colonies were less favored.

    Smith's budget has no allowance for a healthy communal and social life. Entertainment, education, religion and so on.

    No successful American colonial settlement ever began with a base as small as twenty or bound to a space that is at once so physically confined and isolated. I would expect to see alcohol as a problem. I would expect to see suicide as a problem.