Slashdot Mirror


UAE Clerics' Fatwa Forbids Muslims From Traveling To Mars

PolygamousRanchKid writes "The Khaleej Times of Dubai reports that a fatwa committee has forbidden Muslims from taking a one-way trip to the Red Planet. At the moment, there is no technology available that would allow for a return trip from Mars, so it is truly a one-way ticket for the colonists, who may also become reality TV stars in the process. The committee of the General Authority of Islamic Affairs and Endowment in the United Arab Emirates that issued the fatwa against such a journey doesn't have anything against space exploration, Elon Musk's Mars visions, or anything like that. Rather, the religious leaders argue that making the trip would be tantamount to committing suicide, which all religions tend to frown upon."

63 of 363 comments (clear)

  1. Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't want to go to Mars? Please by all means, keep your bullshit on Earth and let us evolved human beings make a fresh new life on a fresh new planet without you!

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shut it, Mars. We know what you did to Spirit.
      Now you're gonna pay.

    2. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you move to another country and never return, did you kill yourself? Why can't we live on Mars?

    3. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lack of food, oxygen, and liquid water. Maybe it will be possible someday, but not now. This fatwa was discussing doing it now, possibly as part of the one way mission to mars that was discussed, which was a complete suicide mission.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Again, how is this really different from any other colonization project? Look at the history of colonization in the Americas, and you'll see that many died out entirely as a result of being unprepared for the environment that they encountered. I suspect that you'll see similar results in the history of colonization into Australia, and if records existed, for pretty much any migration into areas where humans had not been before.

      The general idea would be to find a way to draw the O2 out of the rust initially, and supplant that and the nitrogen we need from supplies sent from earth. Not cheap by any means, but then the colony would be working to grow plants to recover the O2 from CO2. Some water would be brought from Earth, but some would be recovered from ice on the planet. And food would be one of the other reasons to grow plants.

      I'm not saying that the colony would survive. I wouldn't plan on giving even 10:1 against, but presumably we would learn things that could be applied to help the next colonization attempt. But then I'm not expecting the described mission to happen either. If it does, great. If it doesn't, hopefully another will before too much longer.

      --
      You never know...
    5. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by JustOK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Life is a suicide mission

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      Well, they do have a point. Anyone going to Mars on current technology would be committing suicide.

      With that logic you're committing a suicide no matter what you do. You *will* die whether you stay on Earth or move somewhere else, there is currently no way of avoiding that. Also, since almost anything that you do in life is harmful to you you are actively committing a suicide, albeit a slow one.

    7. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the current plans for sending people to mars have no such plans though. They want to send people with no plans of sending any supplies and no plans of sending the necessary life support systems in the first place. Sending a resupply mission would be a major project, and lead times of 6 months to 2 years depending on orbits can make things difficult. With colonization they may had a high chance of death, but they were travelling places with plenty of fresh air, water, and food. Most of the deaths were due to either disease or disagreements with the locals. Many died of malnutrition. But they still had the intentions of living, those who are planning the current Mars trip have no such intentions.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Immerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, why bother with the rust at all? You've got all the 98% pure CO2 you could want in the atmosphere, just pressurize it and get some plants breathing it and you're good to go on oxygen. And assuming you can find a source of hydrogen you'll have all the water you need without too much trouble. Perhaps they could somehow capture the methane plumes we've detected and burn them in the same greenhouse? If you're producing enough oxygen, turning some of it into more CO2 and water would seem to be a good trade, especially if you have a use for the extra energy produced.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Immerman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come now, don't be such a pessimist, over half the humans who ever lived haven't died*, you gotta like those odds.

      *depending on you definition of human. If you include homo erectus the ratio is no doubt somewhat smaller..

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      Dear Houston,

      Need bread and milk.
      eom

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    11. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Khalid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please stop this fatwa unsanity !

      The muslim word is full of stupid jerks who use religion and the beliefs of other people to serve their own agenda, while pretending speaking in the name of Islam. This is not different from a stupid christian priest who give his opinion about a a society matter, they only represent themeslves.

    12. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      It isn't a suicide mission but rather lifetime testing. Suicide results in premature failure.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    13. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Jamu · · Score: 2

      It's more like 1 in 15. At least according to this article.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    14. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by aliquis · · Score: 2

      Not true.

      I don't know what definition those used though. But it was far from 1:1.

    15. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now, this is a hell of a pipe dream: there is no soil on Mars in which you can grow plants. You would have to bring it with you or produce it locally. Neither is easy. Plus, you have to grow enough plants that their O2 output is sufficient to keep the air breatheable. This means you need to plant on a big surface area, which means big greenhouses with a huge surface area through which they will leak heat (its way below 0 degree Celsius on Mars, too cold for most plants). So you need to provide a lot of energy for heating to make this work. If you do this only for the O2 output you're much better off pumping the energy into some chemical conversion process.

      If you can grow enough food using the same plants, it's another matter. However, I am not aware of any successful experiment that was able to keep a closed, small biosphere sustainable for a longer time. This is another damned hard problem.

    16. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Well, I guess the main difference between colonizing the Americas (or any place on this planet for that matter) and the Mars would probably be that the settlers back then could reasonably expect that they would have air to breathe and a more or less agreeable climate that lets them survive. And they could reasonably expect to find edible plants and maybe animals to hunt, too. And as it turned out, they even found other human beings that were friendly enough to help them survive.

      And STILL a good deal of them died. Of starvation, of accidents, hard conditions and various other tidbits. Ok, medicine wasn't as far as it is today, but then again, how far ahead are we today really? Still no cure for the common cold (and yes, you can die from that).

      Now, back then nobody gave a shit when 20% of your population dies per year. That was pretty normal. To be blunt, someone dying from an accident is one person less to die of starvation the next Winter.

      Now try that today. Imagine we send 20 people there (already FAR more than we could possibly sensibly send out, but let's assume that) and only ONE of them dies. The whole mission would be a complete disaster and whoever is responsible would have to give a huge press conference and resign immediately afterwards.

      The reason that settling the "new world" worked out for Europe was simply that it didn't matter how many people died. Try that today, just try!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Predictable environment conditions, yes. Unfortunately, they're predicted to be "fucking crappy".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by mrclevesque · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Mars has a much more predictable environment, so the risk of death should be much lower."

      A vat of boiling oil has is also a more predictable environment.

    19. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      This is not different from a stupid christian priest who give his opinion about a a society matter, they only represent themeslves.

      Some countries have state religions. The UAE is one of those countries.
      AFAIK, all the countries with state religions have a leading religious authority that issues opinions and interpretations on religious matters.
      Hence the "Fatwa committee under the General Authority of Islamic Affairs and Endowment"

      It's no different than opinions issued under the auspices of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel or the Archbishop of Canterbury (head of the Church of England, under the Monarch).
      This should make for some light reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_religion#Current_state_religions

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    20. Re: Well for once I agree with religious crazies by MisterSquid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Again, how is this really different from any other colonization project? Look at the history of colonization in the Americas, and you'll see that many died out entirely as a result of being unprepared for the environment that they encountered. I suspect that you'll see similar results in the history of colonization into Australia, and if records existed, for pretty much any migration into areas where humans had not been before.

      Can anyone in 2014, with a straight face, write that the Americas and Australia were places where "humans had not been before"?

      Such statements don't withstand the scrutiny of someone with even gradeschool historical knowledge, yet here we are having to chew on a +4 comment that forgot humans were in these places well before Europeans got it into their minds to begin displacing indigenous peoples.

      Imagine a colonization trip to Mars that discovered humans who had been living on Mars since before recorded history. These indigenous "Martian" humans then sheltered and fed those of us who traveled from Earth, receiving as thanks a colonist-driven campaign to kill them and appropriate their resources AND THEN two to three hundred years later the colonizers "recalled" how exceptionally difficult it was to colonize Mars, a place where no humans had been before.

      While the likelihood of finding indigenous humans on other planets is unlikely, one day our descendants may encounter extraterrestrial indigenous life forms and, with thinking like the kind exhibited in your post, would destroy those life forms, appropriate the liberated resources, and write a history that enshrined themselves as resourceful adventurers struggling to survive in a harsh "unlivable" environment.

      --
      blog
    21. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The muslim word is full of stupid jerks who use religion and the beliefs of other people to serve their own agenda

      All theist communities are like that. Actually, that's what theism is about in the first place! The sooner we get rid of this crap, the better for everyone.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    22. Re:Well for once I agree with religious crazies by Your.Master · · Score: 2

      The probability of dying after going to mars is more like the probability of dying after shooting yourself in the forehead with a shotgun than it is like the probability of joining the army.

      The difference is transparently obvious.

      And here's an extremely-lengthy example of a fatwa against suicide bombing and ramming planes into buildings: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

      Strangely, people who call themselves Islamic are not actually a hive-mind! Some are rank jack-ass suicide bombers. Others think that's completely against their religion. Unprecedented, right?

  2. Let it begin! by MPAB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cue witty jokes about blowing oneself up not counting as suicide.

    But they should also forbid being born, as everyone that does will die eventually.

    1. Re:Let it begin! by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

      As you might have guessed, Fatwa's aren't really laws as much as they are rules that may or may not be followed depending on whether an individual Muslim wants to.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  3. Buddhism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "the trip would be tantamount to committing suicide, which all religions tend to frown upon."

    Hey get your Judeocentric religious world views out of here! Buddhism goes so far as to feature a story of the Buddha himself committing suicide just to feed some hungry tiger cubs.

    Which is insane like all religions, but I reserve the right for their insanity to be characterized accurately!

    1. Re:Buddhism by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Informative

      I assume he's thinking of this tale.

    2. Re:Buddhism by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Well, *the Buddha* did not commit suicide in that story or in any others of which I'm aware. The name Mahasattva means "great goodness" or "purity", BTW.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  4. Using their own logic... by Taelron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    then staying on Earth, living out your life and dying is also tantamount to suicide too. So you are damned if you do and damned if you dont...

    1. Re:Using their own logic... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Like the man said, "Nobody gets out of here alive."

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  5. @Al Kai Da - RTFF - Read the fucking .. by burni2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. Fatwa

    Stop blasting yourself into pieces, it's forbidden,
    and no your chance to survive is below the mars mission.

  6. How is this a suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Choosing to live the rest of your life in a distant location is not a suicide in any way. If they choose to see this as suicide, then why do they allow youngsters to enroll in their armies? That looks a heck of a lot closer to suicide.

    1. Re:How is this a suicide? by khallow · · Score: 2

      Choosing to live the rest of your life in a distant location is not a suicide in any way.

      From the article:

      âoeSuch a one-way journey poses a real risk to life, and that can never be justified in Islam,â the committee said. âoeThere is a possibility that an individual who travels to planet Mars may not be able to remain alive there, and is more vulnerable to death.â

      It does sound pretty flimsy as an argument. But keep in mind that current one-way plans to go to Mars really haven't even gotten to the Power Point stage yet. They don't really have a lot of incentive to burn brain power on this. I suspect this is a nice way to say, "please don't fall for these scams".

    2. Re:How is this a suicide? by Firethorn · · Score: 3

      It does sound pretty flimsy as an argument. But keep in mind that current one-way plans to go to Mars really haven't even gotten to the Power Point stage yet. They don't really have a lot of incentive to burn brain power on this. I suspect this is a nice way to say, "please don't fall for these scams".

      I think there's translation issues, but what it amounts to is that the proposed mars journey is not only effectively one way, they're also not hauling enough supplies for you to live the rest of your life.

      So rather than living to ~70 or so minimum, assuming no accident takes you out earlier, you're going on a trip with no real scientific value other than studying how you end up croaking, where your life on mars maxes out at around 3-5 years* from lift-off. You're not fighting a war, you're not dying to save others, etc...

      Would the Fatwa have been issued if the proposal was 'The plan is to visit mars and come back, but we figure the odds are 50-50 that something will happen that we can't make it back, but in return we'll collect all this information that may help explorers in the future'? Maybe, maybe not. There's plenty of hazardous expeditions that Muslims have gone on without having a Fatwa issued against it - scaling Mount Everest, visiting the South/North pole, etc...

      *From what I've seen of the proposal.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:How is this a suicide? by erikkemperman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's plenty of hazardous expeditions that Muslims have gone on without having a Fatwa issued against it - scaling Mount Everest, visiting the South/North pole, etc.

      And the ISS, if I remember correctly. There were some issues in determining the direction in which to pray, but those were resolved. Wonder how that would work for Martian Muslims, though.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    4. Re:How is this a suicide? by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that the idea is that while visiting the ISS is 'hazardous', there's a lot of hazardous things out there, the religion doesn't forbid hazardous. What it forbids is outright suicide. Join an expedition to reach the top of Everest without a plan to return? That's suicide. Riding a russian rocket up to the ISS? Let's call it a 1% chance of death. Dangerous, but not suicide. For that matter, sacrificing yourself for others (war, evacuation and such) isn't considered suicide either, even if death is certain.

      As for the Martian Muslims, it depends on which sect they belong to - the simplistic method is simply to pray facing the Earth, but there's something forbidding praying towards the sun(so when Mars and the Earth are on opposite sides...). Then there's the fact that they don't actually use a straight line calculation, they use the shortest route, which means using a circle route on earth... Alaskan Muslims pray pretty much straight north because of that. Also means that you have an actual direction rather than 'into the ground' while on the opposite side of the planet. But when on mars it'd likely be the retrograde orbit to reach Earth.

      Assuming significant colonization of mars by practicing Muslims, I wouldn't be surprised if some leader there just declares a 'Spiritual Martian Mecca' on Mars for them to face when praying.

      Oh, and there's the clarification that if you're spending more worry about which direction to pray in than the prayer itself, you're doing it wrong and that there's an 'any' option in that case. Oh, and you shouldn't change facing during the prayer, even if Mecca is going to pull a 180(start facing towards, end facing away) during that time. Figure out the direction in an expedient fashion(computers are allowed) and pray.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:How is this a suicide? by polymath69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is flimsy as an argument, especially as there's a better argument to be made.

      Suppose the colonization succeeds, but only supplies can be sent, with no return trips? Due to lack of refueling capabilities on Mars this is a reasonable assumption for the next many years. Now imagine "many" is large enough that children may be born, live, and die on Mars before return trips become possible.

      Now how is such a child, able-bodied, supposed to complete the pillar of Islam that is the Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca? Since this would be impossible the Mars-born would be spiritually incomplete or something. Since this scenario can be reasonably presupposed, a fatwa which reasoned along these lines might be ... less silly.

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
  7. Hold the lines by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't see many religious people lining up for an expedition to discover if life evolved on another planet. They still don't believe that it evolved on this one.

    1. Re:Hold the lines by causality · · Score: 2

      This. Seriously - how many astronauts have ever been devoutly religious? Doesn't NASA generally hire scientists?

      Most scientists believe in a God (look it up). They simply have the maturity of character to separate their private personal beliefs from their work. Not all spiritual people are New Earth creationists who believe dinosaur fossils are the work of Satan, you know.

      While they tend not to give a great deal of support to mainstream religion, members of NASA are known to practice various Masonic rituals, even choosing landing sites on the Moon etc. based on numbers important to Freemasonry.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Hold the lines by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you're confused, most Muslims and most Christians have no problem with evolution.

  8. Shouldn't he issue a Fatwa against Smoking? by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After all, Tobacco leads to the premature death of most people who use it.

    I always thought of suicide as the act of killing yourself just for the sake of killing yourself. While one might call something a "suicide mission", that is not the same as suicide, is it? If a soldier stays behind to man a turret in the face of certain death to provide covering fire so his comrades can escape, is he committing suicide?

    1. Re:Shouldn't he issue a Fatwa against Smoking? by fullmetal55 · · Score: 5, Informative

      actually there already is one

      http://islam.about.com/od/heal...

  9. Re:Religon by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    YOU might not care.

    But the fact that many, many other humans DO care is a factor that you should not dismiss so quickly or lightly, Grasshopper.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  10. Re:"suicide, which all religions frown upon" by artor3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You realize Muslim people aren't a hivemind, right? The people blowing themselves up aren't the ones issuing this fatwa. I presume you're an atheist... are you a "fucking hypocrite" for opposing mass murder, given the actions of Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot?

  11. Re:"suicide, which all religions frown upon" by gtall · · Score: 2

    Bullshit. Point to the Fatwa against Jihad.

  12. Irony by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

    the religious leaders argue that making the trip would be tantamount to committing suicide, which all religions tend to frown upon."

    Brought to you by the religion that also endorses suicide bombers, because some suicides are actually ok.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  13. Re:"suicide, which all religions frown upon" by artor3 · · Score: 2

    So when these atheist dictators banned religion and went around killing those who practiced it, that was just ONE BIG COINCIDENCE and had nothing to do with their atheism?

    Riiiiight. Just grow up, and realize that religion, atheism, whatever... none of those things kill. Assholes who think their way is the only way... they kill. Assholes with your mindset, only with more power and less morals.

    Also Atheism is not an organized institution like religions are, so there's no one that can speak "for" atheists, that's like someone who would speak "for" people who love sunsets.

    You realize Catholicism isn't the only religion, right? Most religions don't have a central authority. Any Islamic scholar can issue a fatwa. But the fact that 99.9% of Muslims oppose terrorism doesn't seem to be swaying the terrorists. Because, again, religions aren't hive minds. Members don't really have much influence over each other, and they have even less influence over people who have already proven themselves willing to kill.

  14. But... but... by Maritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What if there's a school on Mars that has a girl in it? It's not going to blow itself up now, is it?!?! More short-sightedness from the 'clerics'.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  15. So is staying on earth by giorgist · · Score: 2

    Pretty much anybody staying on earth or even having returned to earth after going to space has died here. There is no technology yet that can change that.

  16. Re:"suicide, which all religions frown upon" by abies · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But the fact that 99.9% of Muslims oppose terrorism doesn't seem to be swaying the terrorists.

    Quotation needed. I think that you are considerably underestimating amount of 'angry Muslims' in the world.
    If you would say 99.9% of Muslims aren't _actively_ involved in terrorism - sure. But oppose?

    Because, again, religions aren't hive minds. Members don't really have much influence over each other, and they have even less influence over people who have already proven themselves willing to kill.

    Now, this is pure BS. Religions are closest thing people have to hive minds (I count cults of dictators, like in NK, as a religion, even if it is not using world 'god'). Religons influence minds of people in extreme ways. Think about Scientists or other strange cults/sects - this is example of religion completely brainwashing the person. Bigger religions are trying to be slightly more subtle, but still, religion is probably best mind manipulation tool ever invented by mankind.

  17. Indeed... by Stumbles · · Score: 2

    they (UAE) say it would be suicide for such a trip but suicide is OK if they strap bombs on a kid to blow up their enemies and do in the name of allah.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  18. Re:Atheism is not a religion per see by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 2

    Why do you treat it as a binary constellation?

    Fact of the matter is that when someone blows up civilians in a suicide bombing, then 49 out of 50 times they're muslim. That's a problem.
    Other religions generally do not have a problem assimilating into society and identifying with it. Muslims, OTOH, bunch up in ghettos, prioritize speaking arabic before the national language, keep each other in check with regards to following the Koran (ostrasizing those who stray), and pine for the day when the world is run like a caliphate, just like their holy book tells them. That's a problem.
    Generally, you don't see other religions doing this, and when they do we call them nutballs. That's because other religions generally keep their domain of influence to covering morality and the after-life; whereas islam, on top of this, also claims a compendium of how to run the world, politics, behavior etc. That's a problem, because it clashes with everybody else's idea that they have a right to form their own opinions about life and reality, and it makes it impossible to simply brush off inter-religion differences by going "oh well, we'll see who was right when we die, let's just do our own thing until then.". In their eyes, you're kuffir if you're not a muslim, a second-grade citizen worth less than their "brothers and sisters".

    And last but not least, muslims will claim the above is not true. But then again they're explicitly allowed to lie in defense of their religion (taqqiya and kitman). Try and remember that whenever an imam or other islamic scholar tries to dodge questions about sharia. They WILL lie in order to "smooth over" differences, and they'll feel good about it.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  19. Re:Don't agree with the reasoning by Kojiro+Ganryu+Sasaki · · Score: 2

    That's because culture shapes interpretations of religious texts. You cannot simply look at a religious text and, using only that, make broad statements about the religion itself.

    The religion filters the text through human interpretations. What you put in is not necessarily what you get out.

    Look at christianity, for example.

  20. Re:"suicide, which all religions frown upon" by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

    So when these atheist dictators banned religion and went around killing those who practiced it, that was just ONE BIG COINCIDENCE and had nothing to do with their atheism?

    dictator
    1. a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.

    How can you have absolute power when people follow religious leaders, not you? And that claim to answer to a higher authority than you? Dictators suppress and eradicate religion because it's a threat to their power, it's in the nature of a dictator not an atheist. Sharing a religion means you are both working for the same god, you might disagree on the ways and means and goals but you're in it together. Branding it as ateists makes it sounds like we're your equal and opposite, but it's not. If two people go skydiving, they have something in common. If two people don't go skydiving, they still have nothing in common.

    But the fact that 99.9% of Muslims oppose terrorism doesn't seem to be swaying the terrorists.

    Are you lying or just ignorant? Here's an example from a huge study showing that just in Bangladesh is 150 million * 90% muslim * 26% = 35.2 million who think suicide bombing of civilians is sometimes/often justified. In Egypt there is another 85 million * 90% muslim * 29% = 22.2 million people and the same in Pakistan with 180 million * 97% muslim * 13% = 22.7 million. Together that's over 80 million people or about 5% of muslims that DO support terrorism. And a majority of the population in Egypt, Jordan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine and Malaysia want to kill you for leaving Islam.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  21. Re:This from a religion by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is they did read the Koran. It says non believers should be killed. Quite explicitly. Since it is supposed to be god's literal word many scholars have concluded that jihad is pleasing to him. Therefore death as a result of fighting in his name is fine, to be encouraged even.

    Suicide bombing is more contentious, but only in the senses that some people argue against the legitimacy of the war and some argue that it isn't the best way to fight.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  22. Re:This from a religion by dskoll · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you actually READ the Koran? It's basically disgusting hate literature. What do you think inspires the radicals and terrorists?

  23. Re:Newsworthy? by causality · · Score: 2

    Why should I respect stupidity and willful ignorance? Because that is what religion is. ALL religion.

    You could do it out of altruism and grace. That is, you could respect freedom so much that you don't need to always approve of what other people do with it.

    If you need a self-centered reason, like most people do, there is one: you want them to respect your lack of religion, right? You had the same choice they did, to believe or not to believe. They simply chose differently. The way this works, is that either everyone has the freedom to make that choice, or eventually no one does. Because the moment you find an excuse not to respect another's right to choose, you harm your own freedom. Eventually that list of restrictions will be expanded to include you (sooner rather than later, considering how vastly outnumbered you are). Tyranny has always been done that way, over time by means of incremental expansion.

    Honestly you sound like a short-sighted person who hasn't thought this through, probably because thinking it through would interfere with feeling superior to religious people.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  24. How is it suicide? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Its no more suicide than it is to settle in another country with no intent to return, and live the rest of your life there. The 'Mars settlers' plan on living the 'normal' remainder of their life, not just getting there to starve to death in a couple of weeks. ( sure, accidents happen but the plan is what is relevant )

    Or as a Muslim you are required to go 'home' before you die?

    Stupid religious fanatics. Get rid of them and the world would be a much happier ( and safer ) place.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:How is it suicide? by KeensMustard · · Score: 2

      Its no more suicide than it is to settle in another country with no intent to return, and live the rest of your life there.

      There is a distinction between deliberately and inevitably shortening your life by some action (e.g. by going to Mars), and choosing to live your life in another country. This is about the choosing to die, not about hazard, and not about location. Mars residents can expect to live up to a year, maybe less, maybe slightly more. They have no chance of living a full life.

      This Muslim is not alone in considering the current plans for suicide missions to be ethically problematic. Many of the people signing up for the Mars One expedition (and similiar) have unrealistic expectations - that it is the start of permanent settlement, that a Mars colony can thrive, that humanity has some mysterious 'destiny' to move beyond Earth, that they will be remembered fondly by future generations. None of these things are likely or even plausible. If they knew the truth, would they be signing up? What is Mars One, doing, peddling lies that will lead to the deaths of the unlucky few who are chosen?

  25. Re:Well, they could by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    wrong, mainstream ones contribute to "charities" which are terrorist sponsoring organizations. they think they are helping the "truly faithful" while getting to live a more mundane and less riskful lives themselves.

  26. Re:Fine. by DexterIsADog · · Score: 2

    If you're a typical /.er, how is that different from your life until now?

    Disclaimer; I am married to a breathtakingly beautiful Indonesian doctor lady who earns so much more than I do.

  27. The Emperor has no clothes. by westlake · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Clearing away the brush.

    The Malaysian National Space Agency (MNSA) and its Department of Islamic Development held a two-day conference in April [of 2006]. They invited 150 scholars, scientists, and astronauts to discuss "Islam and Life in Space."

    Five times a day (before sunrise, at midday, in late afternoon, after sunset, and at night), earth-bound muezzins call Muslims to prayer. A spaceship traveling 17,400 miles per hour orbits the earth 16 times in a day. Does that mean praying 80 times in 24 hours?

    If interrupting work to pray is not possible, the astronaut may practice a shorter version of the prayer or combine midday and afternoon prayer times, or the evening and night ones.

    The next problem: Where is Mecca?

    Muslims on Earth face Mecca, in central Saudi Arabia, when they pray. The MNSA suggests that the astronaut pray toward Mecca as much as possible, or at the Earth in general. But if it becomes necessary, the astronaut may simply face any direction.

    How does an Islamic astronaut face Mecca in orbit?

    The conference went on to discuss a broad range of concerns. To sum up: The rituals of the Islamic faith are meant to focus the believer's attention on his relationship with his God. They are not an exercise in puzzle-logic and they do not require a geometric or technological solution.

    Moving on.

    In January 2014, former German astronaut Ulrich Walter strongly criticized the project for ethical reasons. Speaking with Berlin's Tagesspiegel, he estimated the probability of reaching Mars alive at only thirty percent, and that of surviving there more than three months at less than twenty percent. He said, "They make their money with that [TV] show. They don't care what happens to those people in space...

    Mars One

    Captain John Smith ran a tight ship and had no use for the Virginian colonist whose plans were based on magical thinking and not careful planning, adequate material and financial resources and a rigorous internal discipline.

    He published a list of supplies he believed to be the minimum requirements for survival on the frontier: essentially a year's supply of all consumables and durable goods, and allowing for a generous margin of safety.

    New France saw one or two supply ships a year, which may give you some idea of the expense. New France, remember, had an economically viable export trade in furs and unflinching support from the crown. Those ships would be coming, hell or high water. Other colonies were less favored.

    Smith's budget has no allowance for a healthy communal and social life. Entertainment, education, religion and so on.

    No successful American colonial settlement ever began with a base as small as twenty or bound to a space that is at once so physically confined and isolated. I would expect to see alcohol as a problem. I would expect to see suicide as a problem.

  28. Re:This from a religion by msobkow · · Score: 2

    Funny.

    The Koran translation I read explicitly ordered the Muslims to get along with the Jews and the Christians and to live in peace amongst them because they all believe in the same God.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.