Slashdot Mirror


Whole Foods: America's Temple of Pseudoscience

__roo writes "Many Americans get riled up about creationists and climate change deniers, but lap up the quasi-religious snake oil at Whole Foods. It's all pseudoscience — so why are some kinds of pseudoscience more equal than others? That's the question the author of this article tackles: 'From the probiotics aisle to the vaguely ridiculous Organic Integrity outreach effort ... Whole Foods has all the ingredients necessary to give Richard Dawkins nightmares. ... The homeopathy section has plenty of Latin words and mathematical terms, but many of its remedies are so diluted that, statistically speaking, they may not contain a single molecule of the substance they purport to deliver.' He points out his local Whole Foods' clientele shop at a place where a significant portion of the product being sold is based on simple pseudoscience. So, why do many of us perceive Whole Foods and the Creation Museum so differently?"

55 of 794 comments (clear)

  1. God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't 90% of Americans still believe in God? Why should their believe in any other myth be surprising.

    1. Re:God by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Homeopathy is bigger in France than it is in the US. So if you're going to make snarky comments about Americans, be sure to throw in a few about the French as well.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Myth: "a traditional story, esp. one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events."

      By that definition, god is absolutely mythological, whether he's real or not.

      There are, of course, other definitions for myth, especially in the vernacular.

      Both the Plato and the Old Testament discuss atheists. I'm willing to bet that there has never been a time in recorded human history when every person believed in a god or gods. That means in no point in recorded human history has god shown himself to all humanity, beyond any reasonable doubt. So if you believe in gods, especially a particular god, it's because somebody told you about him.

    3. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like those soaps. The labels look like something written by Time Cube guy.

    4. Re: God by colinnwn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My wife likes to buy organic fresh vegetables, fruit and free range meat because of the less intensive farming and ranching practices. She claims Whole Foods prices are generally cheaper than other grocery stores and even our farmers market for those items. But the processed and prepared food is much more expensive.

    5. Re:God by ottothecow · · Score: 5, Informative
      For the record--the Dr. Bronner's people write some crazy shit on their soap bottles...but they make a damn good product.

      The crazy ramblings are part of the charm (especially the lemon and vaseline birth control method). I think they just keep it on the bottles in memory of the company's founder.

      If you don't want the crazy, you can buy bars of Kirk's castille soap at whole foods as well, although I don't think they have a concentrated liquid like Dr. Bronner's. Dr Bronner's is a great travel soap--you can do laundry with it, wash your body or hair (if you are not picky about how it rinses out), and even brush your teeth (if you are brave). I spent a month in Europe with just a little bottle of that super-concentrated stuff...and the big bottle I filled it with is still going strong.

      --
      Bottles.
    6. Re:God by mwehle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, I've been enjoying the produce for years while managing to ignore the hype and tolerating the faux-personal interaction of the checkers. I'm not sure that "many of us perceive Whole Foods and the Creation Museum so differently" as far as belief systems and evaluation of empirical evidence are concerned. Many of us go to Whole Foods for the food.

      --
      Wir sind geboren, um frei zu sein - Rio Reiser
    7. Re:God by MikeMo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the Old Testament, the Jewish people, while wandering in the desert, after seeing the parting of the Red Sea and all the miracles Moses brought down on Egypt, continue to fall away from God. He even had an actual presence in their Temple, and would show up as a flaming column from time to time. Nonetheless, they would turn to idols and he'd have to "smite" them from time to time.

      So, yes, even though literally in the presence of God, some people don't believe. Odd, that.

    8. Re:God by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      The soap is great. I especially appreciate the scents used. For whatever reason, most of the scents used in nearly anything smell horrific to me but bronners actually smells like what it says on the bottle.

      Some fear the price, mostly because they don't realize it is very strong soap and will last forever.

    9. Re:God by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the Old Testament, the Jewish people, while wandering in the desert, after seeing the parting of the Red Sea and all the miracles Moses brought down on Egypt, continue to fall away from God. He even had an actual presence in their Temple, and would show up as a flaming column from time to time. Nonetheless, they would turn to idols and he'd have to "smite" them from time to time.

      So, yes, even though literally in the presence of God, some people don't believe. Odd, that.

      Kind of requires you to accept the Old Testament as 100% historically accurate though, which seems a tad problematic to me.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    10. Re:God by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure that "many of us perceive Whole Foods and the Creation Museum so differently" as far as belief systems and evaluation of empirical evidence are concerned.

      I perceive them differently because Whole Foods isn't trying to shove their beliefs into the public schools. Everyone should have the right to believe silly nonsense, but no one has the right to impose their beliefs on others, and they especially don't have the right to use the instruments of government to do so.

    11. Re:God by HiThere · · Score: 4, Informative

      So you actually believe that Moses parted the Red Sea? Even many religious Christians (and, I assume, Jews) are more reasonable than that. The area where they crossed appears to have been a tidal swamp. Waiting for low tide is hardly miraculous...and many who saw it would not think it a miracle. (Perhaps some from inland would...but tides went a bit up the Nile, so that's a bit dubious.)

      I suspect that if some people saw something that others reported as an act of the hand of God, and others didn't accept as such, I'd be inclined to be dubious. Frequently even things that are widely accepted are quite dubious. I tend to class most religious miracle reports together with alien abductions...if I see actual evidence I might be interested, but back when I was looking seriously I never saw anything that didn't have a reasonable explanation...though often the reports were sufficiently lacking in details that I had to satisfy myself with "not proven".

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:God by excelsior_gr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, we have soap here in Europe as well...

    13. Re:God by hermitdev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but it is more rational to disbelieve in that which, by definition, can never be proven, than to believe in the same. That is, at least, if you believe in rational thought.

      As an Atheist, I'm more than willing to accept there is a god (or gods) if any rational proof can be exhibited (I've yet to see it). And no, a book such as the Christian bible, does not suffice. It is known to have been written by man, and the portions chosen to be included by committee/monarch so Charlemagne could subvert and control the ever growing Christian populace. The "books" we now know as the "New Testament" were voted up by man circa 400AD. It is not the word of god. It is a carefully selected sets of works that allowed a king to more effectively control his subjects.

      I, too, can write about walking on water, turning water into wine, etc. But it doesn't make it true. In our time, we call it a novel or a work of fiction.

      I cannot read Arabic, but the select translations of the Koran I've read lead me to believe it would be far less attractive.

      I'm not personally familiar with any other religion, but there is not one I've been exposed to that makes any sense. Every single one is designed as a means to control the minds of a mass of people. They demand sacrifice in this life for promise of an afterlife (that has never been proven).

      Finally, if there was a god or many gods, all of the worlds' religions cannot be correct. And seeming as so much of the mythology around these religions seem to indicate rage and jealousy when they are disrespected, why is it that all of these religions that so fundamentally disagree are allowed to exist? Is it because they're all correct (in which case, there is no one god), or do we cite Occam's Razor and that the reason all of the religions exist is because there are no gods?

    14. Re:God by davide+marney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've got to be kidding, right? Imposing beliefs on children is EXACTLY what schools do, every day. Ever hear of political correctness?

      --
      "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    15. Re:God by Dr.+Smooth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do reasonable people always try to find some way for bible stories to have their foundation in some actual event? What if it's just straight-up bullshit? You know, like Greek myths, or 8-armed Hindu gods, Cthulu, FSM, etc.? Sometimes I think that even trying to find a way to fit biblical stories into reality is like accepting that there's some modicum of truth to these stories.

      But if you really think about it, what stories could possibly survive 2000 years of sharing and still resemble their origins? Have you ever played the telephone game? Within 10 minutes, the story is so distorted that you can't even recognize the original. Add in centuries of illiteracy, dozens of ulterior motives, and there is no reason to think that *any* story in the bible has any basis in reality.

      --

      ...if you ask no questions, beware of lies...

    16. Re:God by manu0601 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But homeopathy secret is the placebo effect, and that is real science.When french drug agency allowed homeopathy a long time ago, they wrote that it helped though the placebo effect while having less side effects than real drugs.

    17. Re: God by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My wife likes to buy organic fresh vegetables, fruit and free range meat because of the less intensive farming and ranching practices.

      I don't buy organic because, among other reasons (promoting socially unsustainable rigid pre-scientific pre-enlightenment appeal to nature type dogma being the main one), I prefer the more intensive farming practices. You might feel good supporting less intensive practices, and that's fine, but there's a reason organic production is not a universal practice; among other things, lower yield per acre, which is to say, more land requirements to produce the same amount of food. If everyone went all natural there'd be no nature left.

    18. Re:God by denzacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Read it again.
      The entire article is a "I'm smarter than these sheep ho-ho-ho. Look at how knowledgeated I am." love letter from the writer to himself.

      I'd have to use at least three different colored highlighters and the Wikipedia's list of fallacies to comb through that article.
      He might as well be arguing that all those kids and talking animals on boxes of cereals and candy ARE ONLY PRETENDING TO BE ECSTATIC about those products - ergo, they are as evil as creationists.

      But this is my favorite part.

      " I invited a biologist friend who studies human gut bacteria to come take a look with me. She read the healing claims printed on a handful of bottles and frowned. âoeThis is bullshit,â she said, and went off to buy some vegetables."

      What is? What are you not telling us?! WHAT DID SHE READ!!!? What is it that the magical scientist won't tell us!!? WHAAAAAT!!!?

      You don't go arguing about something being "OMG not scientific" and then build that argument on the fine art of appeal to authority and... well, bullshit.
      Presenting someone calling something "Bullshit" as an argument is a whole list of fallacies of its own.

      Instead, one should say "Product A claims this, this and this. That is false, because this, this and this study either proves it to be false or shows no proof of it being true or having any other provable effect."
      And then give us links to those studies cause if there is one thing we know for sure - JOURNALISTS DON'T UNDERSTAND MATH AND STATISTICS.

      That's why they went to study stuff that does not require math AND/OR statistics.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    19. Re:God by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 5, Funny

      citation needed

    20. Re:God by Altrag · · Score: 4, Informative

      Obviously, that means that they exist outside of that 4 dimensional spacetime

      Hardly obvious, as another poster has pointed out.

      What I can't accept, though, is a violation of the conservation of energy and mass.

      You can accept extradimensional magical beings but you can't accept the possibility that they have the ability to exceed our known laws of physics? Not to mention the conservation laws become a lot more tangled when you start talking about invisible dimensions -- a reduction in energy in our 4 dimensions could potentially be compensated for by an increase in the 7th dimension and still conform to conservation of energy. The fact that conservation of energy so far appears to hold entirely within our visible 4 dimensions is something to ponder in itself if we accept that additional invisible dimensions exist.

      Is love real?

      Yes. Its a biochemical reaction. We've decided to name that reaction 'love.' It exists because its defined to exist.

      Is the truth real?

      As far as anyone can tell, yes. Things happen in exactly one way. Any individual person may not have the full information regarding how it happened and thus we all have our own interpretations of the 'truth', but even accepting things like the many worlds hypothesis, in any particular time line there is exactly one truth as defined to be the real physical changes that took place in the universe at the exact time in question, irregardless of who saw what. Even quantum mechanics and its inherent randomness doesn't really change the fact (you can define truth as always-past and thus all wave states have collapsed into a specific truth, or you can define truth as including the present in which case 'is in a superposition' simply becomes part of the description of the truth. In both cases, a specific definition of the truth is still available.)

      here is no particle in the standard model for them

      There's no particle in the standard model for water or ice cream sandwiches either. This is a pointless argument. The standard model describes only the most fundamental building blocks. Love and truth are complex interactions between countless particles. (Though to be fair, there IS a 'truth' particle in the standard model.. it just got renamed to 'top' somewhere along the way. But of course that's obviously not the type of truth we're talking about!)

      As a scientist

      I sincerely hope you're only an armchair scientist. Mixing up standard model particles with abstract concepts like love is a leap of logic even most crackpots wouldn't dare make.

    21. Re:God by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are some differences but they are not material enough to change the stories.

      This happens because unlike the telephone game, men and women of the jews were required to memorized the scrolls that made up the torah. When someone recited portions of it and got something wrong, they were corrected by the others who knew the correct versions. Almost all people in the villages participated in this so the stories are reasonable the same as they always were.

      So there is little to no leading away from the originals until it started getting translated into other languages from translated versions. Then you see some differences that could be considered material but the stories seem to work out the same. BTW, the chapter and verse numbers everyone cites today are an artifact of copying that made it easy to double check translations and copies. But that does remind me of a joke. It has something to do with a monk asking to see the original scrolls because he thought if someone made a mistake, they would be copying that mistake. So he asked the Great Schema and he said go down and take a look for yourself, the originals are in the catacombs but it's dangerous down there. So the monk went and was gone for three days. Finally, they got worried and sent someone to look and he found the monk sitting in the corner crying while mumbling we missed the R we missed the R. After a few days rest, they asked him what was it about the R that he kept mentioning? He replied, we missed the R it says celebrate not celebate.

  2. Why single out Whole Foods? by Kenja · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go to Safeway or any other supermarket and take a look around. Or do you really think that post cereals promote heart health? Hell, it took a law suite to stop "vitamin" water from claiming health benefits from their sugar water.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but at Whole Foods, this kind of bullshit is at the core of their business model. In comparison, Safeway are just pseudoscience opportunists/dabblers.

    2. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by ottothecow · · Score: 5, Informative
      I always assumed that the aisle of pseudoscience homeopathy crap was just there because it was super high profit margin and likely to be purchased by the customers who will go out of their way to seek out organic products.

      Personally, I shop at whole foods because it is on the way home and it has significantly better selection and quality of produce than the Jewel (which is slightly more out of the way).

      I really hoped this article (when I read it a week ago, thanks slashdot) would have been about some of the questionable restrictions they place on their food. They have decided that nitrates/nitrites are "evil" and must be avoided...as such they won't sell anything that uses sodium nitrate (instacure #1) as an ingredient. Of course, without nitrates, you won't have bacon or a whole host of other cured meat products (such as many hams/salamis/etc). How does Whole Foods get around this? They figure out how to make bacon using celery juice so that they can say "No Added Nitrates" despite the fact that bacon made this way can actually have higher nitrate concentrations than bacon made with curing salt (and can taste a little funny since who wants bacon made with celery?).

      Either they need to admit that nitrates are OK to eat, or they need to stop selling things that defeat the point of their own restriction.

      --
      Bottles.
    3. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. And this is stupid.

      From the summary:

      So, why do many of us perceive Whole Foods and the Creation Museum so differently?

      Maybe it is because the stuff the author finds objectionable is just a segment of the stuff available there? But the Creation Museum is 100% about creationism.

    4. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Either they need to admit that nitrates are OK to eat, or they need to stop selling things that defeat the point of their own restriction.

      They can't admit that because a lot of their customers are idiots who shop there because of the "no nitrates" stickers.

      Nitrates from celery are obviously more natural than the industrial chemical nitrates used in bacon, right?

      And that's the point of the summary: Why do seemingly-sensible people believe that sort of crap?

      Me? I don't want sea salt. Not with all the mercury and PCBs floating around in the ocean. You think they refine it or anything? Nope, they just evaporate the water and package it.

      I want the stuff that's been underground for millions of years, unmolested by humans until they dig it out. Give me the most refined, chemically pure salt they can possibly manufacture. Sodium and chlorine in equal amounts, that's it (well, maybe a bit of iodine as well).

      You try telling one of the people in the store that sea salt may not be better. They'll chase you out of the shop with a slab of tofu!

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whole Foods, and in my part of the world, Sprouts, are fantastic places to find in-stock fresh vegetables at a fair price, as well as spices in bulk well under the price that a bottle of Shilling or McCormick will cost me. Similarly I can get some deli items (cheeses, specifically) and microbrews my normal grocery store might not carry.

      For that, I love them.

      ...and then there's the homeopathy aisle, and the gluten-free-because-it's-trendy-not-because-I-have-an-allergy aisle.

      For that, I hate them.

    6. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by Shoten · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Go to Safeway or any other supermarket and take a look around. Or do you really think that post cereals promote heart health? Hell, it took a law suite to stop "vitamin" water from claiming health benefits from their sugar water.

      Bingo.

      I go to Whole Foods regularly...but I don't give a shit about whether something is "organic". The produce is better, for the most part...both in diversity and in quality. The meat...holy balls, the MEAT...it's incredibly tasty. I don't get the grass fed beef (I find it tough) but the regular stuff. Yes, it's expensive, but if you want a NY strip that's literally almost 2 inches thick and will taste better than what you can find at most restaurants, Whole Foods is the place. Oh, and yes...we are yuppie DINK scum with both foodie inclinations and the money to indulge them...and for that Whole Foods is like a playground.

      On the other hand, things like sugar, aluminum foil, paper products...we get those at Giant. I don't feel like paying extra just to have my paper towels be gluten free. (Yes, that's an exaggeration, but just barely.) But that brings to mind another thing...if you're gluten-sensitive, gluten-intolerant, allergic to gluten, or just one of those assholes who thinks that gluten is like eating AIDS, Whole Foods is a much better place to look. Though it does get out of hand sometimes; I watched a woman go totally nuts at a guy in the beer and wine section (diagonally opposite from the meat section within the store) over the fact that they didn't carry (I shit you not) "gluten-free bacon." Which of course leads into the fact that Whole Foods caters to that niche for the self-entitled, of which that screaming cunt is just one excellent example.

      But yeah...try their steak sometime. WOW, is it good :)

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    7. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Meanwhile my friend with Celiac's (diagnosed by a real medical doctor, not some homeopathic nutjob) doesn't care who else shops in that gluten-free aisle, just as long as it stays profitable enough to continue to exist.

      I see those people as a willing tax-base to subsidize my friend's medical bills. It works better than any controversy-soaked healthcare laws that will ever be passed.

    8. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      what salt is not sea salt? Do you think "non sea salt" just spontaneously appeared. All salt are from evaporated sea !!!!!

      Pedant!

      The point is: Some of it evaporated before we started dumping toxic crap into the oceans. OK?

      --
      No sig today...
    9. Re:Why single out Whole Foods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a celiac, it's been a mixed blessing though - on one hand getting gluten-free foods has gotten insanely easier in the last 5 years. On the other hand "Gluten-Friendly" has started popping up everywhere where people want to cater to the fad, but don't want the work of having to deal with people with real diseases.

  3. Troll by engineerErrant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While Whole Foods does sell a lot of homeopathy items, that is *hardly* its entire character as a store. I, along with no doubt many others, go there because it's a specialty grocery store that has a lot of interesting foods that you can't find other places, including (and especially) a big variety of craft beers and vegetarian stuff. Their produce and bulk sections are also hard to beat for variety and freshness, and the prepared-foods section is great when you're on your way home and don't feel like cooking.

    I'm no Whole Foods shill, and it does have its share of silliness. But comparing it to the Creation Museum is completely ridiculous and has no place in serious discourse.

    1. Re:Troll by Catbeller · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Homeopathy is not silly; it is a lie. If you sell it, you're lying to people. So it matters that Whole Foods sells it, as it casts doubt on their grasp of science, which indicates their "healthly" foods are just marketing to the credulous.

    2. Re:Troll by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lets assume you're right. How does their grasp of science effect the freshness of their kale? Cause I really don't care about the former when compared to the later.

      It's not their grasp of science that Catbeller calls into question, it's their ethics.

      Everybody with an IQ above room temperature knows that homeopathy is complete and utter bullshit. If they sell homeopathic items, they are, undeniably, participating in wholesale fraud. If they're willing to take your money in exchange for vials of water (priced like toner cartridges!) which they profit from, then why would you possibly believe that their kale hasn't been doctored to remain fresh - exposed to chemicals to keep its color, picked by slave labor, whatever.

      tl'dr? Anyone who'll sell you homeopathic crap is a liar and should be treated as such.

    3. Re:Troll by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Homeopathy is not silly; it is a lie. If you sell it, you're lying to people. So it matters that Whole Foods sells it, as it casts doubt on their grasp of science, which indicates their "healthly" foods are just marketing to the credulous.

      Products in regular supermarkets are also filled with lies, and both have products that better than the other in some way or the other. Solution: make your own decision rather than expecting a corporation to base their decisions on science rather than on what sells best.

  4. ahh homeopathy. by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so diluted that, statistically speaking, they may not contain a single molecule

    ...but THAT is what makes it so effective!
    Looks like Dice and _roo are in teh pockets of big pharma and big grocery !!!1!

    Here's another alarming trend: people are starting to use "homeopathy" to mean "holistic, nature-based, alternative medicine". When you tell them what homeopathy really means you will get "well that's not what it means to me! i mean in the more general sense" or "meanings change over time!".

  5. Food. by Noryungi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AFAIK, Whole Foods main business is not quack snake oil - it's organic produce. (Or is it? I mean, it's been so long since I entered one of these over-priced supermarket...)

    Here is another example: a lot of newspapers have an astrology/horoscope section - or even a religion section - does that make them entirely anti-science? Nope.

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Food. by cbhacking · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It has nothing to do with organicness. It's simply that produce which is grown "organically" typically has a much shorter shelf life (this is not to say that the ways mass-market produce gets an extended shelf life are good, mind you) and consequently must be picked ripe and sold immediately. Mass-market produce is picked quite unripe and transported long distances, "ripening" (to the extent that they can) in transit, in storage, or simply on the shelves (or, considering the unripeness of a lot of what's on the shelves, on *my* shelves at home). That's what causes the taste difference.

      If you don't believe me, go look up some studies. People have done double-blind taste tests, and found that the "organicness" of food was undetectable, while picking it ripe and eating it quickly made all the difference. Or heck, go find out for yourself! There's almost certainly a farmer's market near where you live, it's probably cheaper than Whole Foods, and you'll find it's just as good.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    2. Re:Food. by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm well-off enough to pay more for food that tastes better.

      Me too. I'm well-off enough to pay more for gold-plated connectors on all my digital audio cables that sound better.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  6. Go. Buy food. Leave. by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whole Foods has many products that regular grocery stores do not. I go there, buy the product I want, and leave. Yes, there are some aisles full of oddness, but I just skip those ones. In the end, it's just a store; buy what you want, leave what you don't.

    It's kind of like Best Buy; just because Monster cables are such a stupid overpriced quasi-religion doesn't mean I shouldn't go to Best Buy; it just means I shouldn't buy those cables.

  7. It's simple really... by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... no one, even well educated people, have the time to sift through all the bullshit. Many well meaning people confuse terms marketers came up with to purposefully obfuscate the product with "healthy food". If you don't keep up on that stuff (which most people dont), it would be trivial to be mislead by healthy sounding words through relentless advertising and association.

    When you name yourself something like "Whole foods" you give yourself a different aura, you project "healthy food" not pseudo-science. Not to mention we've had vitamin/mineral half pseudo-science for a while that kind of gave hucksters an in to sneak their bullshit in under "healthy foods". The science for a lot of stuff is difficult/vague and takes a long time to do studies and companies can't wait to exploit the health conscious aspects of peoples brains by confusing them with marketing speak and over promoting the benefits of marginal "health aiding" products.

  8. Class definitions by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Creation museum: customers tend to be poor, relatively uneducated, and don't understand basic science.
    Whole Foods: customers are almost exclusively well-off, expensively educated, and don't understand basic science.

    Everyone's stupid about something.

    1. Re:Class definitions by Theaetetus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Creation museum: customers tend to be poor, relatively uneducated, and don't understand basic science. Whole Foods: customers are almost exclusively well-off, expensively educated, and don't understand basic science.

      Everyone's stupid about something.

      Creation museum: customers tend to believe in everything the museum present.
      Whole Foods: 95% of customers don't even set foot in the homeopathy aisle, and are just there because they have fresher and better looking produce, locally-farmed meat, wild caught fish, fancy cheeses, etc.

      I guess the article writer is stupid about believing that the 5% in the homeopathy aisle represent the majority.

  9. Re:Harm by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Homeopathy only hurts gullible people.

    ...and the people they make medical decisions for. I've personally known people who give their kids homeopathic water to treat stuff they really should be seen by a doctor for. It's not the kids' fault that they have stupid parents, but the kids are the ones suffering harm./p

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  10. Because they don't preach by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, why do many of us perceive Whole Foods and the Creation Museum so differently?"

    1) Whole Foods is a grocery store, the Creation Museum claims to be a museum.

    2) Certain states aren't trying to teach children the "controversy" surrounding dandelion root extract supposedly curing my ailments. There isn't a national debate surrounding gluten-free pancake mix. Politicians don't get elected to office by appealing to the "this organic sea salt is only 4000 years old" crowd.

  11. That's one aisle in Whole Foods by gQuigs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's the entire existance of the Creation Museum. To be fair I would like to see them get rid of that one aisle.

    Whole Foods is doing a lot of really good initiatives, see:
    http://www.wholefoodsmarket.co...

    And they don't just say blindly yes God said so to questions like "Is Organic better for you?:
    http://www.wholefoodsmarket.co...

    And probiotics after taking antibiotics makes logical sense.... I remember a study that showed that our natural bacteria wasn't at the same level 1 year after taking antibiotics (please don't use this as an excuse to not take antibiotics). If we have the right probiotics available to us is a different story. My wife just got antibiotics and the hospital recommened probiotics...

    *Disclaimer: I own a small bit of Whole Foods stock. I'm sure this post will greatly increase it's value....

  12. Re:Because... by xevioso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "No one at the local Whole Foods is trying to impose their beliefs or customs on you our your secular government."

    Well, that isn't necessarily true, because many of the same people who shop at Whole Foods are active in the anti-GMO movement. They shop at WH because they fervently believe at GMOs are bad for themselves and everyone else, and many folks are politically active, at least in California, in trying to put anti-GMO statutes on the ballot whenever they can. So while whole foods isn't necessarily doing those things, they certainly cater to people who do.

  13. Re:Why? by msauve · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the sake of argument, let's say it was pulled out of the nose. What does your nose smell like?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  14. Re:Because... by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The left is just as full of religious whackos as the right is.

    Ding ding ding! I've been snickering quietly to myself about the recent spate of right-wing editorial authors discussing how liberals are trying to eliminate "intellectual diversity". Amazingly, these authors have discovered fundamentalist liberals, and the fundamentalist liberals discovered "purity tests" and "with us or against us" and somehow the right-wing editorialists just don't see the connection, probably because they were blinded to it when it was their side doing it.

    As for the rest of us non-fundamentalists, I don't buy into the homeopathy mumbo-jumbo either.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  15. Selection by Copid · · Score: 4, Funny

    If the Creation Museum starts stocking the same selection of beer and cheese that Whole Foods does, I might swing through from time to time if I'm in the neighborhood.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  16. Re:Because... by curunir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't give a rats ass about whether GMOs are healthy or not. I want them labeled because I don't want a dime of my money to go to Monsanto. I want Monsanto to die because of their patent policy, exploitation of the third world and general willingness to endanger our ability to feed ourselves.

    Fuck anyone who frames the labeling of GMOs as a health issue, be they for or against. It's an informed consumer issue, nothing more.

    --
    "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
  17. Re:Why? by Brainman+Khan · · Score: 5, Funny

    My nose smells Okay, My dog's nose smells great.

  18. Re:Double Standards by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cognitive dissonance is a human trait. You are engaging in it yourself when you try to cast the left as engaging in it more than the right.

    Your whole argument is itself simply an expression of a double standard when you try to claim the left engages in this more than the right.

    It's simply something that arises out of our own human limitations.

  19. Re:Harm by sjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To be fair, the parents who cart the kid to the doctor for every sneeze and to the hospital for a bumped head aren't doing their kids any favors either.