Slashdot Mirror


Tested: Asus Chromebox Based On Haswell Core i3

MojoKid writes "The Asus Chromebox is a tiny palm-sized machine similar in form and footprint to Intel's line of NUC (Next Unit of Computing) mini PCs. One of the higher-end Asus Chromebox variants coming to market employs Intel's 4th generation Haswell Core series processor architecture with Integrated HD 4400 graphics. The machine is packed with fair number of connectivity options including four USB 3.0 SuperSpeed ports, HDMI and DisplayPort output, a microSD Flash card slot, 802.11n dual-band WiFi, and Bluetooth 4.0. It also sports a 1.7GHz dual-core Core i3-4010U processor with Hyper-Threading for four logical processing threads and 4GB of DDR3 1600MHz memory. Finally, the onboard 16GB SSD storage might be appear a bit meager, but it's backed up by 100GB of Google Drive cloud storage for 2 years. In testing, the device proved to be capable in some quick and dirty browser-based benchmarks. For the class of device and use case that the Chromebox caters to, Google has covered most of what folks look for with the Chrome OS. There's basic office productivity apps, video and media streaming apps, and even a few games that you might care to fire up. The Asus Chromebox handles all of these usage types with ease and it's also barely audible while consuming only about 18 Watts under load."

70 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. OpenELEC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Any word if these can be reformatted to run OpenELEC?

    1. Re:OpenELEC? by Oysterville · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a RaspberryPI be cheaper and do the same thing?

  2. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can I install Windows 8.1 on this so I can get rid of the Google ad/spy ware?

    1. Re:Awesome! by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but in that case you could simply get a NUC instead.

    2. Re:Awesome! by Luthair · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sure, but then you have the Microsoft Bing ad/spyware.

    3. Re:Awesome! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

      Obviously trolling, but kind of an interesting question as the hardware isn't bad. I don't know why anyone would buy it with the intention of windows-izing it, but maybe the build quality is better than what the send windows in? Any case there are a million reasons for doing anything.

      http://windows.microsoft.com/e...

      Only 32 bit windows would fit, due to the 16 GB of storage.

      Also not sure if the open source Coreboot will work with windows 8.1. You'd need to install seabios first, that's supposed to work for earlier versions of windows. Not sure about 8.

      http://www.coreboot.org/SeaBIO...

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:Awesome! by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      If you boot any other OS, you'll have to type a key combination every single time you start the system. This can get annoying quickly.

      --
      This space for rent.
    5. Re:Awesome! by recoiledsnake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But atleast you can install Firefox or any other native application instead of only Google being able to install native apps.

      I have no idea why Slashdot seems to cheer on this DRM'ed up the wazoo "computer" that's more locked down than a Windows PC.

      --
      This space for rent.
    6. Re:Awesome! by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The problem there is that while the entry-level Asus chromebox is $179, including the RAM, SSD, CPU, wifi, etc... the cheapest NUCs are $190-200 before you add the RAM, the SSD, and the wifi card.

    7. Re:Awesome! by Ken_g6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe, but in that case you could simply get a NUC instead.

      On one hand, an equivalent NUC is cheaper at $290.

      On the other hand, the ASUS comes with a (small) SSD, RAM, and "a custom wireless ASUS Chrome keyboard and mouse that are collectively valued at $49." The NUC comes with none of those. Together those probably cost more than the $80 difference in price.

      On the other hand, you could get a last-generation NUC with an i3 for $180.

      On the other hand, there's a lower-end ASUS Chromebox, with a Celeron, RAM, and an SSD, also for $180. (No keyboard/mouse with this one.)

      On the other hand, I'm running out of hands!

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    8. Re:Awesome! by idontgno · · Score: 2

      All of that means that you're buying your discounted hardware with your personal information and your willing agreement to be another statistic in their advertising numbers.

      I suspect that's a fair trade for a lot of people, considering how little they actually value their privacy.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    9. Re:Awesome! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I like the idea of these cheap little boxes! But it should be noted that the $180 one you linked does not include an HDD/SSD, nor an ethernet port(!?) (No USB3 either, though it does have high-speed expandability via a Thunderbolt port).

      I know it's not really the same, but I've had good luck with used laptops. Even if I use them primarily headless or with an external keyboard/mouse, you get low power consumption, built-in battery backup, and a built-in screen which is handy sometimes. The only trick is finding cheaper used laptops that have some sort of digital video out, not just a VGA port.

    10. Re:Awesome! by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Right I just don't get this, does not matter if we are talking tablets, media pcs, or phones. All of these machines are big powerful enough now that the possibilities are essentially unlimited. Yet rather than embracing the best of the 90's PC era opening up and trying stuff out; its a rush back the narrow vision that was the Macintosh in 83.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    11. Re:Awesome! by zoid.com · · Score: 1

      So you would rather have the Microsoft ad/spy ware? The answer is don't buy this device unless you want a ChromOS box. ChromeOS is really great for what it is. This would be a perfect system form my dad.

    12. Re:Awesome! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. The comment of "google spyware", combined with the fact that it does not make any sense to buy a chrome device if your intention is to put windows on it ( there are several availible at simular price points from a variety of sources), leads me to believe that they were trolling.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    13. Re:Awesome! by mrp · · Score: 1

      Intel DN2820FYK is selling for $140 and comes with an infrared sensor.

      I have OpenELEC 4.0 beta (version 3.95.1) running off a 4GB USB stick I had lying around - no need to buy an SSD. Infrared sensor worked out of the box with my Harmony Smart Control remote.

    14. Re:Awesome! by rthille · · Score: 1

      Not if you flash the bios, or just put it in developer mode (at least that was true of the older chromeboxes)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    15. Re:Awesome! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      So one can't install Firefox on ChromeOS?

    16. Re:Awesome! by macpacheco · · Score: 1

      Typing this on a Chromebook ARM (dual Cortex A15).
      2GB RAM, 16GB Flash.
      With it were 4GB of RAM and 32GB of Flash, and there's no Java plugin for Cortex ARM CPUs, so I need another computer to do banking.
      Very convenient machine otherwise, no need to worry about moving it while powered on (zero moving parts). Don't even need to power it off, close the lid. A full battery can hold the system in a suspended mode for almost a week. Thanks to having linux under the hood instead of EvilWindows !

    17. Re:Awesome! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yet again you should just go AMD as you can buy the Jaguar based mini-PCs for cheaper, and since those are based on the same cores as the PS4 and XBone if you care any about gaming the coming games should be optimized for it.

      And while we are on the subject of Jaguar and AMD since XP is about to EOL? Please please PLEASE get rid of those damned P4s already, okay? If there was a list of "world's dumbest computing ideas" I'd have to put that one at the top, it was slow, sucked insane amounts of power, and because of the crazy long pipelines one cache miss and it would slam on the brakes. The only thing worse was the Netburst Celeron as the teeny tiny cache made misses all but guaranteed.

      What does that have to do with AMD and Jaguar? Simple the Bobcat, which the jag was based on can be had for just $65 so for less than $100 you can turn any power pig P4 into a MUCH nicer dual core PC capable of 1080P over HDMI. Simply pick up a PCI to IDE adapter so you can keep the original drives and tada! Dirt cheap upgrade.

      One final note...why is everybody making such a big whoop over ChromeOS? We had this in the 90s folks, its called a "thin client" only frankly the 90s ones were better as they weren't controlled by a single company with STASI levels of information about their clients and whom may or may not be connected with the NSA. Hell even if they tell the NSA to fuck off they still consider you to be the PRODUCT and the advertisers the customers so its not like they have your best interests at heart. And do they still TiVo the shit out of them with UEFI? Funny how many here say "Oh M$ is teh evil!" yet I can take any Windows 8.1 laptop and be booting the instaler of anything from BSD to ReactOS in a couple minutes but last I looked the ChromeOS devices were so locked down the ONLY things you could run ere CERTAIN Linux distros and ONLY those that had the hacked loaders...shit, how is turning X86 into a game console NOT evil? Because that is what they did,they took the most standards compliant universal hardware on the planet and turned it into the original Xbox, where you gotta hack the thing just to run a limited amount of software.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    18. Re:Awesome! by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Nope.

    19. Re:Awesome! by Kz · · Score: 1

      its a rush back the narrow vision that was the Macintosh in 83.

      In '83 the Mac was anything but closed or 'narrow vision'. I was a huge leap in usability and programability. It was open to anybody who got the three-volume (soon expanded to 5 books) "Inside Macintosh", a great resource not only on the API but also a good primer on UI design.

      Now, the last couple of Mac OSes, which are progresively tied to the app-store... and windows isn't far from that... currently, the easiest OS to install and configure applications is Linux, by a wide margin.

      --
      -Kz-
    20. Re:Awesome! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Look for the ones with AMD chips, especially the E350s and E450s, as those come with HDMI out and most will hold 8Gb of RAM and do 1080P. A good place to start would be the Asus EEE "B" series, with B standing for Brazos. I have one and its fricking great, 4 years on and it still types well, gets nearly 4 hours on the battery and with 8Gb of RAM everything plays nice and smooth.

      But if you want a really cheap media tank instead of using an old lappy look at th E350 barebone kits as I've seen them on sale at Amazon for around $100 with case, I've built quite a few of those as both media tanks and office boxes and they are really sweet, use less than 20w under load and will play just about any format. A word of advice though, if you get one make sure your player is set to use DXVA and get the codecs from either AMD or the excellent CCCP codec pack as the E series APUs are really designed for hardware video acceleration and not having that turned on ties a boat anchor to them system. Using a player without DXVA a 720p video was hitting 80% CPU while the same video with DXVA was using less than 15% so it makes a HUGE difference when it comes to performance.

      As for TFA how anybody would trust some large megacorp after the Snowden revelations is frankly beyond me...I mean do you have ANY idea how easy it is to know pretty much everything about you simply by having your browsing history? Everything from what kind of porn you like to what medical issues you have and what beliefs you hold can be gleamed from that sooo easy its just not funny. This is why I have one company for mail, another for search, and made a throwaway account just for my android phone, giving ANY company THAT much info is just creepy.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:Awesome! by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The problem with Jaguar is that it suffers from extremely poor performance per watt when compared to Haswell. That may not be an issue for all use cases though.

      I am having difficulty finding any AMD-based mini PCs in the NUC-style form factor with RAM/wifi/storage included for $179, though. Could you point some out?

    22. Re:Awesome! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Good info. For a video player I am an absolute believer in hardware acceleration; even if the CPU load is 100%, software playback always causes stuttering. That is a definite hurdle in the "old laptop" route for that application, since the GPUs tend to be sub-par.

    23. Re:Awesome! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I meant, ...even if the cpu load is NOT 100%...

    24. Re:Awesome! by nctritech · · Score: 1

      You just described my $500 brushed aluminum chassis touchscreen i3-3217U laptop, except it has 4GB of RAM, 120GB of flash, boots cold in 8 seconds, has zero moving parts, and can run Java, Firefox, Windows, AND Linux. Just watched 45 minutes of video on a TV and battery went down 20%.

    25. Re:Awesome! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Sure when you show me a box that is an actual PC and not a thin client for that price, otherwise the comparison is moot as the Chrome isn't a PC, its a thin client. Here is a mini with SATA and wireless for $159, just add a RAM stick and unlike ChromeOS you aren't giving a corporation every single thing you do online...yay!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    26. Re:Awesome! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Thanks. If you want dirt cheap media tanks check out Amazon as you can find ones like this all the time and unlike a used laptop not only does it look nice but you can easily add anything you want, BR drive,SSD, plenty of RAM and HDD, and its easy to add.

      I've used the E350 a LOT at the shop and was impressed enough I sold my full size lappy for an E350, its THAT nice. HD videos, office work, hell I've played Torchlight and Portal on 'em and they are great little chips, all while just using 20w full load and 9w for most tasks. A word of advice though and this goes for ANY APU system...ALWAYS get the faster RAM, in fact if it comes down to 4Gb of faster or 8Gb of slower take the 4Gb because that AMD APUs really need decent RAM to shine. Nothing crazy, no need to OC the RAM, 1333 or better will do nicely. One of the barebone systems I picked up came with 4Gb of 1066, I did benches before and after I switched it for 1333 and depending on the tasks I got as much as 35% more performance simply by having the faster RAM, its THAT noticeable.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    27. Re:Awesome! by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      That does get you down to the same price, but the CPU is going to be something like half the performance of the one found in the ChromeBox...

      I'd argue that between NaCL and modern Javascript engines (what with Mozilla showing off UE4 running at 60FPS+), ChromeOS isn't a thin client.

  3. Re:Worthless by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, this computer is completely unsuited for my needs as a bitcoin mining supercomputer, so no one should buy one.

    Unless, of course, you have different needs than mine.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  4. Re:sooo... by Lazere · · Score: 1

    Not really. The NUCs with a similar price point aren't including RAM or storage, this includes both.

  5. 16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by wiredog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A lightweight one with X and xfce. Put /user on a USB drive and you're set.

    I wonder how hard it is to hack the bootloader?

    1. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Informative

      With some (all?) Chromebooks -- and I would expect a Chromebox to be the same -- you can just enable "developer mode" and chroot. See this article for more details.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't think Chrome OS makes any sense for a reader of /. As for the typo, he obviously meant /home.

    3. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I wonder how hard it is to hack the bootloader?

      Easy enough - Developer Mode is all you need.

      However, it's annoying as the bootloader pauses for 30 seconds to warn you that it's in developer mode and you have to hit a key to proceed or it goes into recovery mode.

      In short, it's not something you really want to mess with - it works in a pinch ,but damn it's annoying.

      And unless it has SeaBIOS, it won't run Windows.

    4. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You understand X and xfce but not /user? I think you are trolling, but I'll answer anyway in the hopes of adding to the discussion.

      wiredog means to put user directories on a USB drive due to the limited internal space.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      It's a plug-in computer anyway, so you can probably just sleep instead of shutting down and then avoid the BIOS start up.

    6. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by Curupira · · Score: 1

      You understand X and xfce but not /user? I think you are trolling, but I'll answer anyway in the hopes of adding to the discussion.

      wiredog means to put user directories on a USB drive due to the limited internal space.

      I think you meant /home.

    7. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I don't think Chrome OS makes any sense for a reader of /.

      I'm currently *reading* Slashdot on my Chromebook, you insensitive clod.

    8. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Name a linux distro

      A bit limiting, isn't it? I guess you weren't trolling, so you are welcome.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's usually "/home" these days, but it can be almost anything - and historically "/user" has also been used. In any event, I think it is pretty clear what he meant, even if he's used to a different unix distro than you are.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:16GB SSD storage is enough for Linux by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No you got me there - he definitely did put Linux right there in the subject.

      I still know what he meant, though maybe only because I missed the subject.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  6. Definitely not for power users by ErichTheRed · · Score: 2

    Even though I do find myself using things like OneDrive and Dropbox to keep non-sensitive stuff I'm working on available at home or at work, I'm not totally convinced that most power users will be replacing their PC or laptop with what's essentially a thin client that Google has control over.

    On the other hand, for people who truly don't know any better, live in a location with five-nine, super-fast broadband access and just don't have the savvy to understand that their data is being mined by a third party, this might take off. It's the same reason tablets are taking off among the "content consumer" set. Amazon is doing something very similar with the Kindle Fire -- basically give away the hardware with the knowledge that Amazon uses your browsing habits to improve their prediction engine.

    Honestly, I wish Google and similar services would offer a "paid" version with no data mining or tracking. People forget that the awesome search engine, maps, etc. aren't a free resource, and their data is paying Google's bills.

    1. Re:Definitely not for power users by egranlund · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I wish Google and similar services would offer a "paid" version with no data mining or tracking. People forget that the awesome search engine, maps, etc. aren't a free resource, and their data is paying Google's bills.

      You can do this partly with Google Apps, doesn't stop the tracking in Google Search though...

    2. Re:Definitely not for power users by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      I'm not totally convinced that most power users will be replacing their PC or laptop with what's essentially a thin client that Google has control over.

      A Chromebook is a 'second' (or third) computer.

      It's the computer that sits on the kitchen counter at home so people can look things up or play some music. It's the computer for email on the couch.

      For those use cases, it's perfect.

    3. Re:Definitely not for power users by ravenscar · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I picked up a Chromebook just to try it out. It has these things going for it: Cheap, acceptable display, great battery life, boots from a powered off state in around 10 seconds, and is pretty solid at internet browsing. I don't store anything on it and it was $200 so I'm not overly concerned if it's lost, broken, or stolen. I find myself using it frequently around the house for light internet tasks where a keyboard is desired (which is fairly often).

      A big plus that I didn't expect - remote desktop works really well. In the event that I'm sitting on the couch and I find myself needing to do something that requires different software or more processing power, I just remote into my home server and do the work there.

      I can't say that I have any complaints at the price point. Of course, I don't expect to do things for which it wasn't designed.

    4. Re:Definitely not for power users by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      On Brazil, the whole setup fails on the "need fast 24/7 internet acess" part. Stable and fast internet here is a luxury.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  7. Internal storage is probably M.2 form factor SSD by m.dillon · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure of that. It is on my Acer C720 chromebook (laptop). If it's M.2 you may be able to just buy a bigger SSD on e.g. newegg, load linux or a BSD onto it, and throw it in. Google for instructions, not all chromebook BIOS's allow non-chrome OS installs.

    -Matt

  8. Re:But... by m.dillon · · Score: 1

    The Acer c720 works great as a small laptop and will run Linux. It isn't quite a replacement for a workstation, it's not as fast as a desktop cpu but it is certainly much faster than the much-aligned netbooks from a few years ago. The keyboard and touchpad are pretty good considering the form factor.

    Booting and setup is a bit hokey due to the minimal BIOS but it works. The c720 has a M.2 form factor SSD internally and it's *easy* to take apart the back (just a lot of screws) and replace it with a bigger one. I bought a 128GB M.2 SSD for mine.

    For the Acer c720 my recommendation is to not overwrite the 16GB SSD in the machine. Instead buy a (bigger) replacement and leave chrome on the original. Also find the acer/google restore disk image (you should be able to google, it's officially supplied) which you can throw onto a USB stick. You need your chromebook's serial number. Always good to have a restore image handy in case you flub the instructions.

    Read the instructions on how to install linux very carefully and do not skip any steps. Worst case you brick the laptop and have to put the original M.2 16GB SSD back into it to get back on track (which is why I suggest not overwriting the original SSD).

    -Matt

  9. 4 Ports, yay. by Rick+in+China · · Score: 1

    I still hate the fact that mini-devices sport so many ports which require traditional plugs. For example Apple has sported the magnetic power connection for ages - when plugging my Air into devices/power, it's by far my preferred of connector - and don't understand why while technology focuses on things like throughput they don't look at simple usability like connecting the throughput as a very common-sense improvement. In short, fuck USB 3.0, fuck the throughput, I just want to plug in my mouse without having to either visually line shit up or non-visually fish around for the right way to connect two things.

    1. Re:4 Ports, yay. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      I still hate the fact that mini-devices sport so many ports which require traditional plugs. For example Apple has sported the magnetic power connection for ages - when plugging my Air into devices/power,

      This complaint makes no sense. You're comparing a 'desktop' computer with an Air.

      How often are users going to unplug their monitor, keyboard, mouse & power on this thing? Almost never.

    2. Re:4 Ports, yay. by ddtmm · · Score: 1

      Really? You would rather forego USB3 and throughput in favour of a mouse connector you can plug in without fishing around? Just how often are you plugging in your mouse? In the case of Apple's reversible Lightning connector they embedded a chip in the connector housing to facilitate that, and to no less surprise, detect whether you're using a genuine Apple cable or not. All that makes their USB/Lightning cable over $20. Is that what you prefer?

    3. Re:4 Ports, yay. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      You plug your mouse on your Macintosh's power connector? wow.
      Mac has always had to be just weird in little ways. I remember I had a hard time figuring how out how to turn a G5 all-in-one one (and when I knew how to do it, spend at least ten tries booting a CD/DVD)

  10. $369?!?! by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    $369?!?!

    No thanks. I can get a better laptop/Netbook/tablet for cheaper and they include a screen.
    I can build a better desktop for cheaper as well.
    If I want to experiment I'll get a RPi
    What niche is this filling?
    Possibly good for an automotive entertainment center or in an RV... but nah. Way over priced. Let me know when it's under $100.

  11. /user by wiredog · · Score: 1

    So used to typing "user" in various contexts. I meant "/usr".

    1. Re:/user by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      But /usr is a big directory.
      Well, that makes some sense, as it's mostly read-only stuff there, putting usr on a slow USB drive makes good sense.
      But now you need that stupid drive hanging off the USB port. It would be nice mounting /usr over the network, if that's still possible. Hell make it a diskless box, with maybe a /home on the SSD just so that the browser cache etc. is fast.

    2. Re:/user by akirapill · · Score: 1

      /usr is a directory for storing user-level programs and files (bin, lib etc), as opposed to root or kernel level programs and files. The reason it's its own top-level directory is for historical (or contemporary in embedded environments??) purposes. You could boot up linux using only the small number of core programs in the /bin, /sbin etc directories, then mount /usr to get your user-level stuff. You could also store /usr on its own drive or partition that way for space/performance. Nowadays it's kind of redundant to have BOTH e.g. /usr/bin and /bin. (someone correct me if I'm wrong) /user is the old name for the directory of users' home directories. If your username is myUserName, then ~ would point to /user/myUserName. Nowadays it's called /home (again I could be wrong about /user not being used anymore. Been a linux user for 10 years, but haven't strayed far from debian)

  12. Yeah, its really annoying how expensive they are by Marrow · · Score: 1

    It cheeses me off.

  13. Re:But... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Why not dd the whole disk, that way you have a bit exact copy of the whole raw block device. Then you can use that 16GB SSD for whatever you want, including use in the laptop. If the laptop really ended bricked though you would need a computer able to read a M2 drive, or a M2 to SATA adapter.

    At $300 though ($200 + $100 for a big SSD) I would choose another laptop, there's the Toshiba with the new-gen Atom (celeron N2810) that comes with a 500GB hard drive and page up/page down keys. And oh, VGA and wired ethernet (I had to check that the latter was missing from the Acer)

  14. Re:But... by m.dillon · · Score: 1

    I read a bit more on the ASUS Chromebox. There are three cpu choices. The 2955U, The i3-4010U, or the I7-4600U. The I7-4600U is very similar to the I7-4700MQ that I have in one of my laptops, and that is a very respectable cpu and very suited for desktop use.

    The only one I see on Amazon is the one with the 2955U (1.4 GHz single-core/2-thread celeron).

    From what I can google the chromebox uses an internal M.2 form factor SSD (16GB), which means you can potentially upgrade it to e.g. a 128GB SSD by buying it on newegg (another $100). This will be considerably faster than a SD card.

    So this chromebox (with the i3 or i7) would definitely be powerful enough as a desktop.

    It just comes down to whether the BIOS will allow third-party OS installs or not and I don't know the answer to that.

    -Matt

  15. Re:But... by m.dillon · · Score: 1

    You can DD the whole disk... but unless you have another machine that can take a M.2 form factor SSD you have no easy way to restore it from the image.

    The Acer c720 laptop will boot the Acer/Google recovery image from a USB stick but all it can do is completely wipe the M.2 SSD, so you'd lose whatever you had on there. If you do not follow the BIOS directions properly you might also get into a situation where it refuses to boot from the USB stick while the M.2 drive is installed with the non-conformant OS.

    -Matt

  16. Re:Intel pay-for-play article- Kerching!!! by m.dillon · · Score: 1

    I think you are confusing Intel's under-powered mobile cpu's with the cpu's they are stuffing into the Chromebox and Chromebooks. These cpu's are MUCH faster than anything ARM has on offer.

    -Matt

  17. /user by unixisc · · Score: 1

    What's the difference b/w /user and /usr? I've seen both

  18. DE of ChromeOS by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Is XFCE the default UI for Chrome OS? Or is it something else?

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Asus C720 by jmd · · Score: 1

    The C720 works wonderful with Bodhi Linux :) I use it for traveling. Sometimes I run bfgminer on for the ASIC miners. Quite usefull when you dump ChromeOS

  21. Re:Worthless by Arker · · Score: 1

    The 100gb Google Drive is obviously useless.

    16GB storage is still more than enough to install and operate a very useful little system though. Somehow I suspect there would be problems trying to get free drivers for some of the hardware, otherwise I might consider grabbing one and slapping slack on it.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  22. Re:Intel pay-for-play article- Kerching!!! by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    ChromeOS is A WEB BROWSER, so it makes fucking absolutely no difference what the instruction set of the CPU is.

  23. Typing this on a Chromebook, too! by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    Probably the highest usefulness-to-cost ratio of any computer I've purchased, given it only cost only about $250 and is so low maintenance and light weight (and relatively droppable).

    I still like a recent MacBook Pro better though for the bigger screen and better keyboard (including backlit) and better trackpad, as well as the ability to run Eclipse and some other software etc.. But for many people, the extra $1000 or more would not be worth it.

    I enjoy the Chromebook immensely more that a Win 8 laptop that has been very frustrating to use, which every time I turn it on nags me with updates and other notices and long reboot cycles and such and just endless clutter getting in the way of actually just using it -- all while not doing much to mitigate security risks from downloads the way a web browser can mitigate risks from loading a web page.

    And in a few years, with improvements in web tools including native code compilation within sandboxed zones, the convenience factor of something like the Chromebook will continue to improve. Meanwhile, both Windows and Mac OS seem to be devolving into harder to use systems.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.