Slashdot Mirror


Measles Outbreak In NYC

sandbagger writes "New York City may have to deal with a measles problem. New Yorkers are being urged to make sure all household members, including young children, are vaccinated. To date, there have been 16 confirmed cases and four hospitalizations. This follows news from the CDC in December that 2013 saw triple the average number of yearly measles cases. 2014 is off to an even worse start; there have been cases recently in the Boston metropolitan area and more than a dozen in the Bay Area as well. Vaccinations seem to be a victim of their own success — people look around and see no polio or measles and wonder why they should bother. Others repeat bogus claim about vaccines causing autism. How do you think we can get through to the anti-vaxxers?"

32 of 747 comments (clear)

  1. Thanks Jenny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thanks a lot you dumb bitch.

    1. Re:Thanks Jenny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I see her as a mass murderer. People have died as a direct result of her bullshit. She ought to be put through the justice system in the same way that someone impersonating a doctor would be tried for a death resulting from his or her false medical advice. Except in her case, it's not just one death, it's a whole lot of deaths. Sure, it's not solely her fault, but it doesn't have to be (nor should it need to be) in our justice system.

    2. Re:Thanks Jenny by hrvatska · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Jenny McCarthy couldn't have done it without news and talk shows presenting her views as being just as valid as real medical experts. It isn't so much 'Thanks Jenny' as 'Thanks Oprah for being more interested in ratings than public health'.

    3. Re:Thanks Jenny by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news, scientists have found that everyone you disagree with is, in fact, just as bad as Hitler.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Thanks Jenny by dwillden · · Score: 4, Informative

      But she's never retracted her position, even though the Dr has been stripped of his license, the study has been retracted and she still continues to preach her message and to gain new followers. For example from Fox News today http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/03/14/kristin-cavallari-defends-decision-not-to-vaccinate-her-son/?intcmp=features

      Do we blame her by being misled by the study? No. But once the study was refuted and the findings retracted she refused to change her tune. And so we blame her for using her celebrity status to push a dangerously misguided position that is leading to increased deaths and illnesses that would never have happened had she not pushed her cause and refused to change her position when the study was proven false.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  2. Obvious Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We should present to them the facts! That will sway their minds. /sarcasm...

    1. Re:Obvious Answer by Gr8Apes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Expose them to measles, mumps, diptheria, etc seems to work. Maybe not compassionate, but neither is preaching ignorance and endangering society.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:Obvious Answer by ibwolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember, those who do not vaccinate their children put their children at risk, but these are THEIR children, not 'ours'.

      This is simply not correct. There are a number reasons some children can not be vaccinated, including allergies and other health problems. Generally, if vaccinations are widespread, those that can not be vaccinated will benefit from the herd immunity afforded by general vaccination. When the number of non-vaccinated kids goes up, the effect of the herd immunity goes down putting the children that can not be vaccinated at risk.

    3. Re:Obvious Answer by dentin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Religion is no excuse to not be vaccinated. There should be no religious exception.

      --
      Alter Aeon Multiclass MUD - http://www.alteraeon.com
    4. Re:Obvious Answer by mrbester · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So, just as it is now?

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    5. Re:Obvious Answer by bmeiers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree. I can't take my dog to a kennel without proof of vaccination. Are our dogs in kennels more important to protect than our children in schools?

    6. Re: Obvious Answer by wagnerrp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It goes even further than that. When the virus is allowed to propagate among even a small percentage of the population, there is a chance for that virus to mutate in a manner that renders the vaccine less effective, putting everyone at risk.

  3. Tell them a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tell these people a story about a kid that got sick and nearly died because of not being vaccinated. It was recently shown to be effective, which makes sense, since these people seem to think emotionally rather than rationally. Evidence does nothing to convince them.

    1. Re:Tell them a story by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Neither of those are at all true. Plenty of pediatricians (like ours) refuse to treat willfully unvaccinated kids because of the high risk they present to other patients. If you're taking a two week old baby into the doctor's office for a well baby checkup, the last thing you want to see is some moron's measles vector sitting in the same waiting room. "First, do no harm" nicely dovetails with "by condoning and tolerating anti-science Luddites spreading disease through your office."

      This isn't uncommon and most doctors who feel this way make no attempt to hide it. If nothing else, if a patient doesn't trust their doctor when recommending safe, prudent vaccinations, will they trust that same doctor to recommend emergency surgery or other invasive treatments? If there's not a trust relationship, why even bother with it?

      Anti-vaxxers should come to expect that their rejection of science leaves them to see only homeopaths and other witch doctors because science-based ones won't touch them with a 10 foot pole. If they want to practice voodoo, why should they want or expect to receive all the other benefits of legitimate medicine?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  4. Dumb logic by Vermonter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Well my kid died of measles, but at least he didn't get Autism"

    1. Re:Dumb logic by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Funny

      OMG measles is like a 1700's pirate disease. Nobody catches it anymore. That's ridiculous. The government is just injecting nano-bots into your bloodstream to spy on you and make you eat fatty foods so you die before they can pay you social security and...*cough*...*dies from measles*

    2. Re:Dumb logic by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was *not* a fake polio vaccination campaign. Every one of the subjects got a *real* polio vaccine. The catch was that the vaccination wasn't the only thing they did.

      People have died, but not because they got fake polio vaccines, but because Pakistanis are now refusing to get vaccines at all because they're afraid they're all CIA fronts.

  5. People need to realize... by dosius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People need to realize that Andrew Wakefield, the father of the anti-vax movement as we know it today, was discredited and disgraced for the shoddiness of his so-called "research".

    Oh yeah, and he had a vested interest in kids not getting MMR vax - I think he had ownership of a patent on a different rubella-only vaccine. Herp derp.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  6. DNA Testing by the_scoots · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe we'll have the capability to cheaply trace each confirmed case back to the source through the DNA of diseases. Turn a few ambulance chasing lawyers loose on folks causing outbreaks for whatever reason and a few people might change their tune.

  7. You won't get through to them by egranlund · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do you think we can get through to the anti-vaxxers?

    Unfortunately, I don't think anything will get through to them until their kids and loved ones start dying from very old and highly preventable diseases.

    Their mindset is one much like the followers of creationism, etc where they believe that:
    1) All scientists have been bought out by "big pharma" or
    2) That the consensus among the scientific community is some kind of organized ploy to sell more and more drugs.

    Because of this, no matter what scientists or public health officials say, they just plug their ears and go "LALALALALA".

  8. Marketing is everything. by TomRC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just tell them that the vaccine is fully organic, low sodium, fat free and gluten free.

    Also, it's got Electrolytes.

  9. Why worry - its natural selection in action by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its sad, but if the kids of parents who only think on a base emotional level die then its clearing out the human gene pool. We should thank them.

    1. Re:Why worry - its natural selection in action by song-of-the-pogo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Herd immunity

      The trouble is they're putting others at risk who, for varying reasons, are unable to be vaccinated. That is irresponsible, to say the least.

      --
      soupy twist
  10. Cut them off by Swampash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you don't vaccinate your child, fine. But if you reject society like that then expect society to reject you.

    No vaccination? Forbidden from attending school. Forbidden from visiting a doctor. Forbidden from visiting any public facilities like libraries, train stations, or airports. Forbidden from riding a bus or train or taxi.

  11. Re:Simple: Let them die. by grapes911 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call me selfish, but that doesn't help my 8 month old daughter who can't yet get the vaccine and relies on herd immunity for the time being.

  12. Re:MMR Outcry? by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Casually watching the autism debate, I see that autism is:

    - Now a spectrum, not a syndrome or disease. This has enlarged the affected population, enhancing the power of their advocates and increasing the urgency of finding a solution;

    - Being blamed (root cause) on vaccines, diet, environmental effects, technology, with a de-emphasis on genetics and prenatal care.

    - Used to describe many more behaviors, hence becoming a 'spectrum', not a syndrome or disease or even a process.

    - Described as a growing treat, capable of potentially impacting a majority of the population, being caused by a multitude of toxins, exposures, and behaviors, hence the urgency to find 'a cure'.

    This pattern is familiar to me. Have you other /.rs seen this before?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  13. I've lost friends over this. by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always known some people that were stupid enough to fall for this garbage. And I always told them how dumb they were being. But now I have my own kid. Now, I ask... "Is your kid vaccinated?" and if not they are not allowed in my house, and not allowed around my kid unless mandated by law (school) One couple got mad at me, and I finally just told them to go screw themselves. The life of my child is not worth maintaining your pseudoscience addled minds fantasy. I'm sick of it, and everyone else should be to. Ostracize these people and their kids. Do not allow them near you. The only thing that will fix this insane fad is peer pressure.

  14. Re:MMR Outcry? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Herd immunity isn't rubbish. The reason we're worried is because of three things:

    1) People who can't be vaccinated due to medical conditions. If you have an immune system disorder or are allergic to the vaccine, you won't be able to be vaccinated. In this case, you need to rely on herd immunity.

    2) People who are too young to be vaccinated. Suppose you have an 8 month old baby and plan on vaccinating her. However, the MMR is given at 12 months. So your baby is still susceptible until then.

    3) Vaccines aren't 100% effective. Nothing is. However, they are around 99.9% effective. Of course, with millions being vaccinated, this still means that thousands will still be susceptible.

    If everyone was vaccinated who could be, herd immunity would protect these other people. When anti-vaxxers first started out, they relied on herd immunity also. Skip the measles vaccine and nothing happens! Because of herd immunity. As the numbers of anti-vaxxers grow, though, herd immunity breaks down and the diseases spread.

    If anti-vaxxers were only affecting themselves/their children, I'd take a "it's a personal choice, albeit one I disagree with" stance. Since their choice affects (and kills) other people, though, I don't see this as a right of theirs. You don't have the right to kill someone else's baby because you want to listen to Andrew Wakefield and Jenny McCarthy.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  15. Re:Anti-Vaxxers? Try Population Density by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I skipped the second M of the MMR (mumps), as my sons exposure risk was minimal and it's very treatable with lower bad outcomes than the vaccine.

    Have you ever seen the mumps? What kind of sadistic bastard would rather see his kid suffer through that than a 5-second injection?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  16. Re:MMR Outcry? by wagnerrp · · Score: 5, Informative

    4) Viruses mutate, and mutations can bring rise to resistance against the existing vaccine. The more people who get the virus, the higher the chance it has to mutate into a new strain.

  17. Re:A bit of common sense maybe? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And you would most assuredly be wrong. Certainly not recently. We are quite careful about what we eat, tending only to eat those things God fashioned and directed us to eat.

    God provided me with a cheeseburger yesterday, and it was aluminumally delicious.

    Yes, I'm making fun of you. All opinions aren't equal, and yours is incredibly naive and dangerous. You're endangering your kids for no legitimate reason, you're a bad parent, and I have no desire to be tactful about this idiocy anymore.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  18. Re:MMR Outcry? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a parent of a child with autism (as well as someone who is likely on the spectrum as well, albeit not diagnosed), I feel qualified to clarify some of this:

    Now a spectrum, not a syndrome or disease. This has enlarged the affected population, enhancing the power of their advocates and increasing the urgency of finding a solution;

    Autism is a developmental disorder. (It was never a "disease" as that implies being contagious. You'll never "catch" autism from me or my son.) The term "spectrum" is used because autism can describe individuals with vastly different levels of developmental delays. My son is very high functioning, you might not know from a casual observance that he even has autism, until he can't cope any more and melts down because his schedule changed slightly. Other kids with autism around my son's age might be non-verbal or have other, more severe, issues that their parents deal with.

    Being blamed (root cause) on vaccines, diet, environmental effects, technology, with a de-emphasis on genetics and prenatal care.

    This is only true for the anti-vaxxers and other such groups. Scientists actually investigating the cause of autism are focused on genetics as the primary cause. There might be environmental factors as well, but it looks like those only trigger existing genetic markers. I often liken it to diabetes. You can get diabetes from environmental factors (eating too much high sugar food), but your risk for it is determined by your genes.

    Used to describe many more behaviors, hence becoming a 'spectrum', not a syndrome or disease or even a process.

    See my first answer as to why it is a spectrum.

    Described as a growing treat, capable of potentially impacting a majority of the population, being caused by a multitude of toxins, exposures, and behaviors, hence the urgency to find 'a cure'.

    Again, this is just those anti-vaxxer/etc groups. Personally, I don't want to be cured. My brain is just fine as it is. In fact, I credit my autism with helping me program computers. (One of the traits of people with Asperger's Syndrome/High Functioning Autism is thinking in If-Then terms. Horrible for social situations, but fantastic for working with computers which operate - at a basic level - on an if-then system.)

    The "growing threat" is just due to better detection. Were I my son's age now, I'd likely get diagnosed, but back when I was a kid that didn't happen. I was just termed as "shy" and perhaps "weird." I took things too literally ("take off your coat" => I take it off and put it on the floor) and didn't understand why people seemed to "get" this socialization thing where I didn't. It was almost like everyone got some How To Socialize instruction book and they forgot to give one to me. (I could get a diagnosis now, but that would spend money we don't have and wouldn't really help me or my son.)

    The best thing for kids with autism is early intervention. Detect it early and give them therapy and other resources to help them deal with the neurotypical world. (That'd be the rest of you who aren't autistic. Never use the term "normal" to someone dealing with autism unless you want an angry diatribe directed at you.)

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.