Slashdot Mirror


Goodbye, Google Voice

itwbennett writes "The trouble with Google Voice is that the way we use phones has changed — and it hasn't kept up with the times: 'Fewer people have a mobile phone and a business line and a home line that might make One Number For All so. Text message costs (which are actually close to nothing) are almost always bundled into contract costs. Automatic voice transcription, while still a mean feat, is no longer such a magic trick,' writes Kevin Purdy in a blog post explaining why he's breaking up with Google Voice. The main problem is that, despite some very cool features, Google Voice doesn't play well with others — even apps in its own family. And it doesn't look as though that's going to get better anytime soon." I've been very happy with Google Voice for a few years now, and one reason is the transcribed voice messages, which may get hilariously garbled sometimes, but are almost always correct enough to be useful.

166 comments

  1. its only usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is when you need to provide a phone number for verification purposes and either don't want to use your real number, or your are verifying several things and need multiple numbers.

    1. Re:its only usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Microsoft Bing Rewards. +1.

    2. Re:its only usefulness by GuitarNeophyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am currently living outside of the U.S.. I still have a Google Voice number, because my permenant address is still in the United States. With Google Voice, we can make calls to people living in the United States still for free. That's a pretty epic usage.

    3. Re:its only usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who has never used it. Let's see just a few of the things you missed:

      - Ability to put people into groups and allow different ring through / busy / straight to voicemail times for each group. Even a "number disconnected message for a blocked group.
      - Setting up a second GV number to use as a "home" phone for all those stupid calls from the kids school, then forwarding the email to both parents so we just get a transcript and no annoying rings.
      - Easy ability to test new phones with different SIM cards and just send your same number to the new phones.
      - Texting from your computer or tablet.
      - Free VOIP calls via GMail on your computer. (I use this for work conference calls all the time)
      - Call screening. You can set it (like I do) so that all unknown callers must say their name before getting through. Then GV rings you and says, "call from (recorded name), press 1 to accept". Very easy to ignore unwanted callers, while still letting through people you want to talk to who are calling from a different number.

      There are lots more. Perhaps try it and see which features you like. Nobody has my "SIM phone number" - they only have the GV. The mistake lots of people make is continuing to use / hand out their physical number. That defeats the purpose of GV and makes it pretty useless. It needs to be set as YOUR number to be effective.

    4. Re:its only usefulness by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Same here. It also allows me to give out a US address to those who can't process international numbers. A surprisingly large number of very large businesses can't process an international number (for one, nobody in the IRS not in the International Department can call international, for another, Wells Fargo can send me international mail, but also can't call international) - or so say the people I've spoken with in such organizations. It could be training, rather than technical/financial, but most companies lock down international dialing for fear of scams. There are still constant reports of PBX exploits generating $100,000+ phone bills to a 900 number equivalent outside the US.

      The problem with Voice is that I signed up in the US, so I get free calls. But those that don't sign up until they are outside the US will not get that treatment, unless they sign up from within the US, and Google has taken to identifying IPs based on usage, not GeoIP, so you could use a VPN service with a US ARIN address physically located in Texas and Google will still consider you as being in Europe. The only "reliable" away is to have someone in the US sign up for you, then send you the login.

    5. Re: its only usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I use Google Voice there is a massive lag in the call and we always end up talking over each other in the conversation. If not for that lag, I'd love it for all of the reasons you describe.

      I've had other professionals call me and I ask them of they're on GV whenever we keep talking over each other. They're always shocked at how I knew that.

    6. Re:its only usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that there are apps like GrooVe IP which allow you to make free VOIP calls via your Google Voice number. When I was still in college (and therefore somewhat poor), I skipped a few months of paying my month-by-month phone bill and just used VOIP. Since I had Wifi at home, on campus, and at my friends' houses, I pretty much had a usable phone throughout those months when I was broke.

      —shvelven (posting anonymously to preserve moderation)

    7. Re:its only usefulness by aviators99 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that there are apps like GrooVe IP which allow you to make free VOIP calls via your Google Voice number.

      Not for long.
      From your own link:

      Due to changes in Google Voice, this app will be switching to a different provider to make and receive calls. You can find the most up to date information on our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/snrb....

    8. Re:its only usefulness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what I do as well. It's incredibly useful to have a US-based number when I'm not in the US.

  2. Horrible Headline: google voice still around by lemur3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google Voice is not being phased out (yet) by google.

    This is just some doosh on itworld ranting about junk on his blog.

    1. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I'm tagging this article as troll.

    2. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.Gogle voice is insanely useful for me. This article was titled to get readers attention. Hitting unsubscribe now.

    3. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Inops · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Couldn't the Slashdot editors filter the bs from the titles? I suppose "Obscure tech writer stops using Google Voice..." doesn't have the same click rate.

    4. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's adorable. Back in my day your post would have been modded redundant for being absolutely obvious from reading the summary, and your reply would have been buried by the troll mods it received.

      That guy hasn't ruined slashdot as much as kids like you. Although I did enjoy the slight irony of calling someone autistic while displaying poor interpetation of emotion and empathy. Welcome to slashdot.

    5. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it literally hurts me to read that the autistic are your go to insult

    6. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You literally don't know the meaning of literally, autistic asshole. Just like the rest of your retarded generation. The word you are looking for is figuratively.

    7. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by gatkinso · · Score: 0

      "Douche." Now, one letter at a time... "d"...."o"....

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    8. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, AC, we "believe" you.

    9. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Nimey · · Score: 2

      No, they don't care.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    10. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whoousce

    11. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they don't. I'm usually finding myself in places where I have wifi and but no phone signal (traveling to foreign countries) and I count on iOS Hangouts to always be available.

    12. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by lytles · · Score: 2

      the complaint about MMS is legitimate, but it's not a question of google supporting it - AT&T and verizon refuse to send the messages to GV numbers. other than that, GV is awesome ... my cell phone bill is less than $10 per month

      i haven't tried the hangouts integration - it's possible that that makes things worse

    13. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The point of the headlines is clickbait.

      If you want a story accepted, give it a clever clickbait headline.

      That is all.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      maybe he has an autistic family member, and to see someone use "autistic" as a pejorative causes him pain. Yes, emotional pain is real pain. Literally.

    15. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      and apparently there's nothing more newsworthy coming across the firehose. I suppose we should take this as a sign that many people have stopped contribuitng to /. Perhaps they're over at SoylentNews now.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    16. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Informative

      This headline is so dangerously bad that it makes me want to tag slashdot as a troll.

      Seriously, this is so bad lawyers can get involved. Some editor needs to go fix it.

    17. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I blame the group of scientists who go around declaring successful nerds as "being autistic" and who are taking action to stop the trend by treating every smart child as autistic as the root cause of it becoming a pejorative term.

    18. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Considering how many services they have tossed in the past couple years? Honestly I wouldn't be counting on it or pretty much anything else they make that doesn't already make them serious bank, which AFAIK would be Search,Mail, and Android. Everything else could disappear tomorrow since Google won't tell us any kind of metric they use to decide whether to keep or toss so we'd know what is in danger of axing and what isn't.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    19. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      And write a summary that pisses of at least 20 people ;-)

    20. Re:Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I read this and was horrified thinking that Google was shutting down Google Voice.

      Awhile back, we switched our landline phone number to an extra mobile phone to save money (the $10 extra a month was cheap compared to a wired landline). We had been using Google Voice since the GrandCentral days and decided to port our "home phone" number to it. It cost $40 in one-time fees. ($20 to port the number and another $20 to keep our old Google Voice number.) Now, if someone calls our "home phone", it rings my wife's cell and my cell at the same time. We can take the call or let it go to voice mail. We can block telemarketers (mark as spam and they get a "this number no longer in service" message next time they call), but Google Voice tends to do that automagically already. (We see a number as having called us but our phones don't ring.) New features would be nice, but we're really happy with Google Voice and would hate to see it go away.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    21. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      As someone with a son with Autism (High Functioning Autism/Asperger's Syndrome) and someone who is likely autistic himself (though not diagnosed because it just wasn't done when I was a kid), I confess that I am a bit annoyed that the AC would use "autistic" as an insult. Then again, I've also learned over the years that there are just some people whose opinions and actions aren't worth being outraged over. This AC is clearly one of those people.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    22. Re: Horrible Headline: google voice still around by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      As someone who is personally dealing with autism (my son), I can tell you that "being smart" and "being autistic" are completely different things. Yes, one group of people - those with Asperger's Syndrome like my son - can be highly intelligent, but most people with autism have normal intelligence levels. They just don't understand the "social rules" that the rest of the world seems to instinctively know and their senses can be overwhelmed by sights/sounds/smells/etc.

      Imagine that you crash landed on an alien world that was a lot like Earth except that the sun appeared five times as bright in the sky, everyone talked in a shout at every moment, walls were made of a material which emitted a foul odor (which nobody but you seemed to smell), and the rules of social etiquette were completely different from any country on Earth. You'd live each day being bombarded by sights, sounds, smells, while trying to figure out the right things to say to people so as not to insult them and to fit in. You might get somewhat good at it, but it would be a hard effort to keep up and you'd need time to decompress. You'd have good days where you'd almost fit in and bad days where you just want to run screaming and hide from the world.

      This is the life of someone with autism.

      (Thanks to the kids' show Arthur for that "alien world" description. They did a great job in staying accurate while simplifying it down to something kids could understand.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  3. Voice messages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are those for? Send an email or shut up.

    1. Re:Voice messages? by chill · · Score: 1

      Those are for when you are driving and it is so much easier to just leave a VM. Also, when the background noise in the car makes a dictated e-mail look like it written by a drunk, illiterate wombat.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Voice messages? by michrech · · Score: 2

      You mean there are *non* drunk / illiterate wombats?

      --
      bork bork bork!
  4. Still Useful for many things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The google voice # is still great if your going to sell anything on Craigslist, ebay, etc. You have one number that will reach you anywhere and you dont have to give people your personal #. After your done you can switch it in a second.

    1. Re:Still Useful for many things. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      It's also great if you have a mother-in-law on the other side of the world. The cost per-minute for calls from phone to phone (she just cannot seem to figure out Skype) is as good as any provider.

      My wife talks for an hour and it's just a few cents. Or at least that's how it seems. Plus, we can do all kinds of other tricks with voice to text and other things.

      I was about to get really pissed if this story was about Google pulling the Voice service.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Still Useful for many things. by BradMajors · · Score: 2

      Free and low cost phone numbers are available from multiple sources. This is not a unique property of google voice.

  5. WTF? by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Google Voice as my primary phone number. This is because (like Stephen Hawking), I am quadriplegic and unable to speak due to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig's Disease). I use it to text and for the relatively few "voice" telephone conversations I have (using my eyegaze computer which - via text-to-speech - "speaks" what I type). I use it for texts daily and for at least one vocal conversation a week (I use web-based video conference multiple times per week to conduct my biomedical and technology research business).

    1. Re:WTF? by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It's also great to be able to check my phone messages and even send/receive from that number even if I can't find my phone.

    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kindling

  6. Save google voice! by cedarhillbilly · · Score: 2

    Maybe it is a good headline because it caught my attention and drove me to comment. Being backwoods senior citizens, my wife and I use google voice all the time. No cell service where we live so we stay in touch with our family and our volunteer activities without paying for long distance using google voice. Besides, some of us less dexterous seniors need a keyboard to respond to texts. Google if you are listening, don't dump voice cuz some yuppie in a metro area has a bug up his a**

    1. Re:Save google voice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google isn't canceling Google Voice. This is just some lame blogger who couldn't think of anything to write about so he decided to bitch about GV and pretend he was quitting it. Obviously, I'm betting he doesn't.

    2. Re:Save google voice! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Another chrono-American here who wishes for more general ability to move between the voice and text worlds: Parent was given the impression that GV was being canceled because Google has a history of blipping in and out of experimental technologies too fast.

    3. Re:Save google voice! by cedarhillbilly · · Score: 1

      yes and I'm a /. classic fan, sorry about that.

  7. Fox News? by Like2Byte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that you? To reiterate another poster's comment, this is just some dude's blog entry.

    Seriously? WTF with the headline, Timothy? Is /. Into sensationalist, eye-grabbing headlines now? How about maybe only showing comments 5 at a time while you're at it? That should garner some ad revenue. That title is *very* misleading.

  8. Google Voice still being actively developed by lemur3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some of the complaints in this blog were mentioned in a post by a google employee 4.5 months ago:

    https://plus.google.com/u/0/+N...

    ... rest assured, weâ(TM)re working to support SMS messages for all Google Voice phone numbers ... we are listening and working hard to make this happen, but we need to work with carriers and this can take some time.

    It will take some time before Google Voice is fully integrated into Hangouts, and we appreciate your patience along the way.ï

    there is also mention of third-party apps which, on android, use various methods to achieve VOIP through Google Voice on the handset, which isnt a feature that Google Voice currently allows (it must route your call via an actual phone call).. these apps have been warned that they will be no longer to do that by May 15th of this year..

    im guessing that we will be seeing some changes to Google Voice in the coming few months... maybe even things that make this itworld blog post seem kind of silly.

    (disclosure: been using google voice since its first year, wish it could be better... 'breaking up' with it over the stuff in TFA is silly, some of those gripes are silly)

    1. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Google Voice is "still" being actively developed? What has Google added to Grand Central at all?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by mrbester · · Score: 2

      Still actively developed would be "We've got this 3+ year old thing, it's really popular and maybe the rest of the planet might care if they could use it".

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    3. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      there is also mention of third-party apps which, on android, use various methods to achieve VOIP through Google Voice on the handset, which isnt a feature that Google Voice currently allows (it must route your call via an actual phone call).. these apps have been warned that they will be no longer to do that by May 15th of this year..

      Gee, that sounds about as helpful to their customers as retiring Google Reader...

    4. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still actively developed would be "We've got this 3+ year old thing, it's really popular and maybe the rest of the planet might care if they could use it".

      Try "we bought this thing"

    5. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Still actively developed would be "We've got this 3+ year old thing, it's really popular and maybe the rest of the planet might care if they could use it".

      As a Canadian, I'm often pissed-off by all the services not available in Canada. Maybe Google are not aware there's more than one country in North America.

    6. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by luther349 · · Score: 1

      wile xmmp is ending killing off 3rd party apps for voice incoming support for hangouts on pc has been on chrome for some time and recently for ios. android should be done by the time xmmp ends.

    7. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      He must be the only developer working on it because google voice has been about exactly the same for what, 5 years? I really liked Google voice, it's amazing for someone who travels internationally and a great way to interact with people using SMS. But it's had these problems for years, and hasn't changed more then slightly in all these years.

      I mean, just as an example, when Google came out with IP calling from the web, they added it to gmail and not voice, even though it uses your voice phone number. They -still- haven't added those features into the Google voice portion of the app/webpage.

    8. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Still actively developed would be "We've got this 3+ year old thing, it's really popular and maybe the rest of the planet might care if they could use it".

      As a Canadian, I'm often pissed-off by all the services not available in Canada. Maybe Google are not aware there's more than one country in North America.

      Well, yeah, it can be pretty common for US companies to overlook Mexico sometimes...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    9. Re:Google Voice still being actively developed by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      What has Google added to Grand Central at all?

      Not much, but they did add number porting and a pretty nice integration with Sprint Wireless service.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  9. I have Google Voice, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use it much. I would use it more if I could send MMS messages on it...

  10. timothy phones it in..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been very happy with timothy's editing for a few years now, which may get hilariously garbled sometimes, but is almost always correct enough to be useful.

  11. The underlying story? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0

    To me, the underlying story is that Google is no longer as well managed as it has been in the past. Projects aren't finished; maybe those working on them got bored and decided not to be adult.

    I've thought about and studied the phenomenon of companies slowly degrading for decades. Hewlett-Packard was already going downhill in the 1970s; the company was making data acquisition hardware that had an obviously unfinished design.

    Fairchild Semiconductor was, at one time, the best manufacturer of transistors. The company began selling power transistors with epoxy casing. The epoxy degraded the transistors. It seemed that Fairchild never recovered.

    Tektronix was a great company at one time; everybody in the tech world was impressed with Tektronix oscilloscopes. I suppose the good managers decided to move to other efforts. One problem was that Tektronix was not prepared for lower-cost competitors.

    More recently, Adobe seems to me to be on a long downhill slide; the PDF file formats were a gift to the world. Now Adobe seems to me to be becoming more and more aggressive toward its customers.

    Jamie Dimon of Chase Bank seems to me to be becoming tired of being CEO and making huge management mistakes for which there have been multi-billion dollar fines.

    1. Re:The underlying story? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Tektronix was a great company at one time; everybody in the tech world was impressed with Tektronix oscilloscopes. I suppose the good managers decided to move to other efforts. One problem was that Tektronix was not prepared for lower-cost competitors.

      Having known somebody employed by them who was frustrated with the changes at the company, I think there is a bit more to it. Some of it is the sort of thing that hit all of these companies - the MBAs took over.

      For Tektronix, however, I really wonder if it wasn't the end of the cold war that really caused a shift in technology spending. If you watch any of those 80s videos on SDI (Star Wars) or other big defense contracts you'll always see Tek blue-green in the equipment racks. Their niche was making the best gear money could buy, and it seemed like Tek was constantly selling stuff to aerospace contractors. If you're building some radar system designed to evade the best jammers the Soviets could build, that is the kind of gear you need to test it. Technology was a huge priority in US military buildup during the cold war. Today that niche is much smaller than it used to be.

      But, I'm not in this field personally, so I could be missing something. It seems like great companies often fail once their founders are no longer running them day-to-day. I've always argued that the founder does best (just the result of selection - you wouldn't have heard of the company in the first place if they didn't do a good job). Then their hand-groomed successor takes over and that usually goes reasonably well (the Tim Cook / Ballmer - perhaps the "exception that proves the rule"). Then the executive search committee takes over and it goes all downhill.

      Actually, the problems MS has goes all the way back to Gates and the fact that the model just doesn't work any longer - Ballmer has stayed fairly true to the MS of the 90s. Often companies go down because companies abandon the corporate culture that made them successful. I suspect that MS and Apple may fail because they don't abandon it quickly enough.

  12. Google Voice Don't Go! by sanosuke001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use Google voice exclusively. It allows me to have a phone number separated from my service provider which I probably won't have forever (so I don't have to worry whether I'll be able to port my number over). It allows me to make phone calls from my computer for phone interviews and the like (headset/mic so I can type). It also allows me to text people without paying Verizon a dime for bullshit reasons.

    --
    -SaNo
    1. Re:Google Voice Don't Go! by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      There are other companies who provide the same service you are seeking.

    2. Re:Google Voice Don't Go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Examples, please.

  13. Don't worry about that by stoploss · · Score: 2

    I use Google voice exclusively. It allows me to have a phone number separated from my service provider which I probably won't have forever (so I don't have to worry whether I'll be able to port my number over). It allows me to make phone calls from my computer for phone interviews and the like (headset/mic so I can type). It also allows me to text people without paying Verizon a dime for bullshit reasons.

    I use GV in exactly the same way for exactly the same reasons. I just seamlessly "ported" from one wireless provider to another a few months ago. Unlike "real porting" I could use both phones while I was getting things setup and switch my inbound call routing back and forth between the devices at will.

    This article is just some hipster douchebag's whiny blog. I tagged this slashdot headline as troll.

    Of course, you *do* have to worry that Google is planning to subsume Voice into Hangouts. That decision is so obviously retarded it can only have something to do with Google's attempt to make Plus get traction. Oh, and maybe someday GV will support MMS. It's annoying that those messages get blackholed.

    1. Re:Don't worry about that by bloosh · · Score: 1

      Why *do* I need to worry about GV becoming part of Hangouts? I'm looking forward to it.

    2. Re:Don't worry about that by wirefarm · · Score: 2

      I'm with you guys. I lived overseas when I signed up for Grand Central, which became Google Voice, so I could get a US number for my mom to call me on, that I would route to a skype number (it's harder to keep the same skype dial-in number if you're as forgetful as me at keeping a balance on it).

      Now I have Google Voice going to an app on an old iPhone with no cell service, and use WiFi for 99% of my calls, occasionally sending the traffic to any number of 'burner' phones if I won't be near WiFi.

      The funny thing is I had never noticed the MMS issue.

      When I'm at the computer, I use the Hangouts plugin for chrome to make and receive calls and it works well, where before I had to be logged into the right Gmail account and have the page open for it to ring. If you use Chrome, I highly recommend it.

      --
      -- My Weblog.
  14. Google Voice probably lives... by flarb936 · · Score: 1

    I was convinced Google Voice was next on the chopping block after they canned reader. The iOS app hasn't been updated in over a year, and they broke gmail GVoice calls awhile back. But they've now added Google Voice support to Hangouts, which leads me or believe it's going to morph into a Hangouts feature instead of a standalone service.

    --
    ralphbarbagallo.com
    1. Re:Google Voice probably lives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you could do phone calls from Google Talk originally, which turned into Hangouts, so it makes sense. I know too many Google employees that use Google Voice to expect different.

  15. Where is native VoIP support? by swb · · Score: 2

    Where is native VoIP support? That's the feature that would be most appealing, the ability to make and take calls to other 'real' phones from devices with only data access as a native feature.

    I know there are other third party apps that can do this like Skype or Line2 and there are apparently back-door ways of doing with GoogleVoice (which according the the Google blog post quoted above aren't supported).

    But I always expected this to be a Google Voice feature and it hasn't been.

    1. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's strange it's not been integrated as the functionality seems obvious (and there's apps like GrooveIP that do it). The only thing I can imagine is that the actual carriers are warning Google off from including that sort of functionality as I'm sure they'd not like all their customers getting free calls. When Google Fiber has rolled out to the world, and Google buys TMobile, then we might see that functionality.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    2. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by philthedrill · · Score: 1

      Some third party Google Voice apps do support VoIP (like GV Mobile+), but yeah, it would be nice for it to be in the official app.

    3. Re: Where is native VoIP support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be that if google turns voice into a telephone service then they need to make it a focus of their business and take on all those costs and responsibilities.

      They can keep selling ads and offering little services to keep people interested...or, they can become the next Skype/AT&T/whatever that everyone bitches about. Tough call.

    4. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      It used to be but was removed.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    5. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gvoice only lets you link 2 phone numbers to one real number.
      If they supported VOIP it would be a lot easier to have a ton of phone numbers.
      That's something I actually want, I want to hand out a different phone number to each person (really each company) that requires a phone number in order to reduce their ability to cross-reference me in the Big Data databases.

    6. Re: Where is native VoIP support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just outsource and cooperate. Right now I need an AT&T phone to make phone calls through my AT&T wifi account, This is just pernicious.

    7. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by swb · · Score: 1

      I kind of expect Apple to do it in cooperation with the carriers so that devices like iPads and maybe even iPod Touches could use voices. Add the phone app functionality to non-phone devices or enable it in wifi-only scenarios on existing phones.

      I'd see it as something carriers could charge some kind of extra fee for as well as call them cell "minutes" no matter how they are used. This allows them to monetize it. Possible opportunity to further monetize it by offering additional phone numbers or other phone features.

      Voice functionality on a non-phone device would require an existing Apple iPhone on your plan -- this covers whatever risk Apple feels from people buying only an iPad mini (even with 4G data) and using it as a phablet without buying an iPhone.

      Lets Apple enter the "phablet" market without actually having to create another iPhone device itself.

      Creates unique, Apple-only feature of making and taking calls using your iPhone cell number on any enabled i-device. iPhone in another room? Don't get up, just answer the call from the couch on your iPad.

      I think it's an interesting idea that has just enough value for everyone (carrier, Apple, consumer) that I'm sort of surprised they haven't implemented it.

    8. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In answer to your question - SIP support for Google Voice is found on Asterisk.

    9. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by fortfive · · Score: 1

      Well, you can do this, on a computer at least, using Google talk. You have to use chrome, though, to make it happen, at least on my Mac.

    10. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by Caedite+Eos · · Score: 1

      Some third party apps still work. Most will no longer do so after the middle of May.

      My OBi202 is one, and so is GroovIP, and so on and so on. Bummer, for sure, but other free, or nearly so, alternatives do exist. So, in the end ... shrug.

       

    11. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Apple won't do that - they'd rather you buy an iPhone than use an iPad or iPod to act as a phone. They are in the business of selling hardware, their software and services exist to sell new hardware - not expand the capability of old units.

      However, there IS a way to do what you ask - Skype. I use it (along with Google Voice), my Skype number ($5/month) is my main business number. It will ring me at my computer and my cell phone, wherever I am connected to the Internet. For example, I'm in China right now, but I do have a China Mobile account with data - and I get calls from the US on my Skype number whilst out and about in town. I also have voice mail, for the relatively few times I am not connected (or when I am not available). Yes, it costs $5/month to have that phone number, but I have unlimited incoming call minutes - and it's always live, around the world.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    12. Re:Where is native VoIP support? by swb · · Score: 1

      As I said in my previous post, if it did exist both Apple and the carrier would tie any such functionality to an iPhone cellphone number.

      For Apple, this would guarantee you would have to own an iPhone to get the functionality and prevent you from using an iPad/iPod as a phone without buying an iPhone.

      The advantage to Apple would actually be more of an enticement to buy other iDevices since you would gain phone functionality on them you wouldn't get from other vendor products, plus they wouldn't need to offer a phablet since they could basically claim iPads were phablets for people that bought into the extended phone service.

  16. Stupid Headline. by krelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Say goodbye to Kevin Purdy.

    I use google voice a lot.

  17. I had to stop using it because it missed calls by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Every so often it would just not record a call at all. Which meant people left me messages and I had no clue.

    I LOVE voicemail transcription. In fact, I wish they'd just get rid of voice mail entirely and make everything text. But at the very least, carriers should offer voice mail to text messaging. It can't cost anything. The computing power is marginal and the text costs are zero.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:I had to stop using it because it missed calls by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      We get that too. However, when I look up the numbers of the missed calls, they are invariably reported as numbers that telemarketers or scammers use. I think that's happening is that Google Voice allows you to mark a number as spam. Someone calls you and tells you that you won a prize and just need to come down and listen to a presentation to get it. You mark it as spam. So do a bunch of other people. Google notices this and does what anti-spam filters do for e-mail: sends the call to the "spam folder" In Google Voice's case, this means you see that 555-1212 called, but it doesn't take a message.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:I had to stop using it because it missed calls by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I mean calls weren't being recognized at all. They weren't in the spam filter or anything. Just not recognized. And the people issuing them weren't on any spam list. My parents for example couldn't call me from their home phone. It would direct to voice mail and then not be recorded.

      It didn't do that initially but at some point it started not recognizing some calls from some people and that was just not acceptable.

      Very sad about it. Because I really like voice mail transcription. But I can't have calls be lost like that.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  18. Google Voice is following the trend of USA only by ukoda · · Score: 1

    It is getting hard and harder to deal with Google outside the USA. In the old days you could buy Nexus phone using a VPN and a friend in the US as the shipping address. Now you have to have a USA issued credit card and many times they know you on a VPN. My Google Glass invite will expire in 2 days which pisses me off because is my $1500 not as good anyone else in the USA?

    Google Voice is simply another case in point. On May 15th they will block 3rd party apps, effectively disconnected people who uses Google Voice outside the USA. The native Google Voice app demands you verify against the USA phone number, which is fine while you are visiting the USA but once you leave it will stop working when you get a new phone or the app is updated. Groove IP was a great work around and allows you to join those US based work conference calls for free but would cost via Skype. Also handy to contact US based associates that don't have 24/7 VOIP app running and Skype has never work 100% on mobiles.

    BTW I would love to hear suggestions for open source VOIP apps that would work as alternative to Skype? I can't say I seen any that can find peers without a commercial service or PSTN behind it.

    1. Re:Google Voice is following the trend of USA only by SixGunMojo · · Score: 1

      It is getting hard and harder to deal with Google outside the USA. In the old days you could buy Nexus phone using a VPN and a friend in the US as the shipping address. Now you have to have a USA issued credit card and many times they know you on a VPN. My Google Glass invite will expire in 2 days which pisses me off because is my $1500 not as good anyone else in the USA?

      I wouldn't be surprisedif this largely due to Google trying to avouid litigation in the EU to avoid a conflict with their business model and the EU's privacy laws.

      On anouther subject, I also use Goggle Voice frequently. I have a blacklist on my phone that only allows numbers in my contact list to ring. I made my GV number one of my contacts so my friends have my 'real' phone number and everyone else gets the GV number. Voice Choice on Google play allows all calls to my contacts to be made from my phone number and all others to be made from my GV number. This could also be a great way to separate work and personel calls.

    2. Re:Google Voice is following the trend of USA only by thsths · · Score: 1

      I second that. Initially Skype did not have a telephone bridge, but now you can call worldwide (from and to) for decent prices - even free for freephone numbers. Google Voice on the other hand is getting more and more difficult to use, and the new hangout is another huge step back (trying to find an SMS is quite a challenge). I wish Google would sometimes focus on the customer experience...

    3. Re:Google Voice is following the trend of USA only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish Google would sometimes focus on the customer experience...

      They do, you just haven't realized you're not the customer - you're the product.

    4. Re:Google Voice is following the trend of USA only by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      It is getting hard and harder to deal with Google outside the USA.

      Don't blame Google. Blame your lame ass government that wants to harass and extort them.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:Google Voice is following the trend of USA only by ukoda · · Score: 1

      Wow, what flame bait, and you managed to get a score of 2 for that! Many of my fellow citizens are unhappy about recent law changes made by our government to support your government and our new laws give Google and other USA companies more rights to control our citizens than they have over US citizens. It looks like TAPA will make that worse.

      I challenge you to put up or shut up! Name one single case where my government has ever harassed or extorted Google? Last year Google earned $6.8M here but only paid $165K in tax, does that sound like harassment? That's less than 3% while I'm taxed at 30%, who is extorting who?

      I guess you didn't even know what I country I'm from when you posted. I will give you a clue, I'm from New Zealand. It is attitudes like your that lowers the world option of Americans. Fortunately I have spent some time in the USA and realise there are actually intelligent people there, it's just hard to tell it from posts like yours.

  19. Can we get a ban on IT World stories please.... by guevera · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ....they've always been worthless content free clickbait, but it seems like we're seeing them more often lately.

    1. Re:Can we get a ban on IT World stories please.... by Threni · · Score: 1

      There may be hope: http://soylentnews.org/

      I've no idea who's running this site, but an alternative Slashdot sounds intriguing and may go some way to addressing the increasing number of problems plaguing this site.

  20. It definitely has issues. by Simulant · · Score: 1


    In my experience SMS is broken with Google Voice... no group texts, no attachments, randomly misses texts completely. Highly unreliable.

    But I kind of like this about it. Nobody texts me anymore.

    Probably not much of a selling point though.

  21. A reason to really like Google Voice by virago81 · · Score: 1

    Look up: Obi202. It's a small box that allows you to use Google Voice not just as "call forwarder" but as your primary phone number via VOIP.

    --
    Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards. -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:A reason to really like Google Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Obi202 will stop working in a couple of months when google voice drops XMPP support.
      If you currently rely on the Obi202, make other plans.

    2. Re:A reason to really like Google Voice by DocJohn · · Score: 1

      Indeed. We have used multiple OBI 110 boxes, connected to different Google Voice numbers, and it works like a charm for landlines. Free landlines. As many as you need. For free calling, with a regular telephone.

      I'm sorry, but anybody who knocks a service that allows you to deploy free regular telephones (after the cost of OBI 110, $47 on Amazon) to anyone with an Internet connection isn't seeing the forest through the trees. Not everybody has or needs a mobile phone. (And especially the cheap phones many people buy as emergency phones for their senior parents are absolutely crap to talk on.)

      As long as Google doesn't do anything to screw up the use of an OBI, it's gold.

    3. Re:A reason to really like Google Voice by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      Look up: Obi202. It's a small box that allows you to use Google Voice not just as "call forwarder" but as your primary phone number via VOIP.

      Yup, and they advertise that it won't work after May 15th with Google Voice. Apparently Google will be taking steps to block 3rd-party VOIP integration on that date. I'm not quite sure how they'll manage to stop it entirely though, unless they eliminate Hangout support as well.

    4. Re:A reason to really like Google Voice by bloosh · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Obihai boxes (I have one which I use for Google Voice) use XMPP for Google Voice.

      Google is killing XMPP support and the Obi boxes will no longer directly support Google Voice at that point.

      Fortunately, the Obi boxes also do standard SIP. You can get a SIP account from a VOIP provider and a DID. Point your Google Voice number at the DID and you'll get incoming calls.

      For outgoing calls, most decent VOIP providers will allow you to set your outgoing caller ID after verifying that the number is valid.

      It's not free, but it works and it's relatively inexpensive.

    5. Re:A reason to really like Google Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a SIP account from a VOIP provider and a DID. Point your Google Voice number at the DID and you'll get incoming calls.

      IF you are in the USA.

    6. Re:A reason to really like Google Voice by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      You can get a SIP account from a VOIP provider and a DID. Point your Google Voice number at the DID and you'll get incoming calls.

      IF you are in the USA.

      Actually, as long as you get a DID in the USA you can get them anywhere. Google has no way to know where that forwards to.

      But it is quite silly to have Google call out to the PSTN, only to route it back into a VOIP call. If they just let you register a SIP address with them they could bypass the phone network entirely. I believe this is mostly done for regulatory reasons - they can avoid collecting various government fees because they argue that their customers already pay them on the lines they forward to.

  22. Free by rabbin · · Score: 1

    I still use Google Voice because it's free (well, I suppose it's not free because they are collecting my data, but I have a feeling the carriers are doing the same anyway). How can you beat that? Sure, I'm only able to use it at home and through WiFi hot spots, so it's only a little bit better than a landline, but I'm not getting gouged by the cell phone companies for a couple of GB a month.

    Now someone will respond to this and tell me what great cell phone service they have that's not available in my area and is still garbage for the price ("See? The system works for me. Why isn't it working for you?")

  23. Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by philthedrill · · Score: 1

    One thing the article nailed:
    "MMS messages not only don't come through, there's no notice that someone tried to send something."

    Most users don't know the difference between SMS and MMS (and why should they?), so it requires explaining to other people why you only get some texts and not others.

    I do like the spam number blocking feature, though, and I'm afraid that once I port it over to a real phone I'll get more telemarketer calls than useful ones.

    1. Re:Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MMS texts (and images) come through but only if sent from a Sprint phone. I was rather surprised one day when I received one - I assumed google finally added support for mms. It wasn't until after a lot of trial and error and sleuthing that I figured out it was only if the mms was from a sprint phone.

      The article is correct - google voice should be alerting someone (sender or receiver) the message wasn't delivered, but my hunch is that Sprint is providing the connectivity for Google Voice and they just throw away 3rd party MMS messages as part of the contract in order to keep bandwidth down.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by lytles · · Score: 2

      i agree - silently dropping MMS is a killer

      afaict, AT&T and verizon refuse to send the data to google so there's nothing technical that google can do, ie this has nothing to do with google being stingy and everything to do with AT&T and verizon being a virtual duopoly and using their market position to exclude competitors

      here's an article talking about it. and from the google engineer's google+ page (emphasis mine) ...

      T-Mobile has allowed MMS messages from their users to be sent to Google Voice users.

    3. Re:Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Most users don't know the difference between SMS and MMS (and why should they?), so it requires explaining to other people why you only get some texts and not others.

      They do in my experience. And I've yet to come across somebody that's ever used MMS. I know I haven't.

    4. Re:Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by luther349 · · Score: 1

      well thats odd being my t-mobile can mms fine with hangouts.

    5. Re:Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by sbrown7792 · · Score: 1

      Strange, I've never had a problem with that. I'm on AT&T and whenever someone sends me MMS, I get a text saying "MMS Recieved" and an email with the media as an attachment, within seconds. It's far from ideal, but at least for me its not silent.

    6. Re:Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by philthedrill · · Score: 1

      Group texts (in iMessage) are MMS, and the less tech savvy people don't realize that. And people have sent me texts with images, which I wouldn't have known about unless someone told me that they sent them.

    7. Re:Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      I know this. This does not invalidate my former statement.

    8. Re:Silent MMS dropping is a deal breaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMS, no thank you. Your smartphone does email, just send me a fucking email. I am not interested in your picture if you do not know how to send it properly.

      Google voice is fucking amazing, for several reasons.

      1.) GV separates my phone number from the cell phone carrier, so they do not 'own' my number and I never have to worry about 'porting' my number if I get a new phone from a different carrier. Instead, it is attached to my Gmail account, which I already use for every other form of communication.

      2.) GV forces SMS messages to appear in my email, so I can read the messages from a computer, a tablet, or my phone, whichever is more convenient. Even if my phone is dead, in the car, forgot it at home, dropped in the ocean, whatever.... I can still receive telephone calls and SMS messages!

      3.) I NEVER have to listen to a voicemail unless I am actually interested in the content. I see a missed call notification in my email, if they leave a voicemail I read a couple words from the transcript, and 99% of the time I either understand the content of the message from the transcript, or I do not care about the content at all and can safely ignore it without listening. The remaining 1% actually have some audio content I want to hear, so I can listen to it from the convenience of my computer, tablet, or phone.

      Silently dropping MMS is not ideal, but it really does not register as a concern for me. the other benefits of GV far outweigh this disadvantage, and I see it as a training opportunity to educate clueless friends and relatives to stop fucking sending MMS messages. It may not cost the sender anything to send it (assuming they have an unlimited plan), but it DOES cost the receiver (in the United States) to receive the message. If the receiver does not have an unlimited MMS plan, and they haven't already called their carrier to opt-out of MMS, then that one clueless relative who unexpectedly sent an MMS instead of an email with an attachment just caused a 25-cent charge (or worse) to appear on the receiver's cell phone bill! It's not 1999 anymore, your data-capable phone can send a proper email, it's not difficult, and it does not cost extra. Learn to use your phone. Fuck MMS.

  24. Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ok, so is there some *OTHER* free number you can get and keep forever that will let you forward it to you?
    Is there another free *real* phone number you can get and answer on the computer? (SkypeIn is available but that isn't even close to free).

    Also, the author is mixing up Google Voice the Service with Google Voice the app. Some of the "problems" depend on the app you use. That's true with "normal" SMS messages too. Not all phones/apps show emoticons - and I've never used MMS in my life. Google voice was originally designed to forward calls, and didn't even do SMS back when it was Grand Central.

    Anyway instead of MMS, you can use email if you have a fancy smart phone.

  25. Google voice only ever worked in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So who cares.

  26. Wait!... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait! One dickhead stops using Google Voice and that earns a frontpage article on Slashdot??

    SERIOUSLY?!?

    Ok, come the fuck on!!!

    Can this site make even a minimal effort to not be total shit? For quite a long time, Slashdot was very educational and informative but, over the past few years, it has sunk to near-uselessness. It's only because some people steadfastly refuse to give up despite the fact they are fighting a losing battle that the site isn't entirely crap.

    One guy stops using Google Voice and that earns a Slashdot article.

    Wow.

    1. Re:Wait!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait! One dickhead stops using Google Voice and that earns a frontpage article on Slashdot??

      SERIOUSLY?!?

      Ok, come the fuck on!!!

      Can this site make even a minimal effort to not be total shit? For quite a long time, Slashdot was very educational and informative but, over the past few years, it has sunk to near-uselessness. It's only because some people steadfastly refuse to give up despite the fact they are fighting a losing battle that the site isn't entirely crap.

      One guy stops using Google Voice and that earns a Slashdot article.

      Wow.

      Soylentnews.org

    2. Re:Wait!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that most everyone who was all that involved left the site for SoylentNews/Pipedot/usenet's comp.misc, I can't say I'm surprised. The quality of content on this site since the Slashcott has been pretty goddamn abysmal...perhaps one of these days I'll be bothered to remove it from my RSS reader.

      RIP Slashdot...it was great while it lasted.

  27. Re:Salesman giveaway number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use Google Voice as my salesman number. Anytime a request for info, or quote request, requires giving a verification or call back phone number, I use my Google Voice number. Mine does not combine my numbers. Most helpful for night shift workers.

    My Google Voice number does connect ro a free IPKALL number, which connects to a free SIP account. The free SIP account is accessed by a Linlsys PAP2T-AT which gives me a free phone line and number to give out. Call screening features work great. GV allows placing calls on a PC, and ringing your SIP phone so you don't use any airtime. Texting makes the number appear as a cell phone. Keeps you from getting texts all day to your cell. I text salesmen beck at 2AM that send sales pitches.

    Most of the time it silently goes to voicemail, unless i'm expecting a verification call. When I expect a call, I turn on the ringer, or login on a laptop if in the field.

  28. Google often ignores the social effects. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Google's handling of Google Voice is getting an enormous amount of bad public relations. Google often makes changes without adequate explanation. See, for example, this information from Google: An update on Google Voice.

    Obviously, no one considered the effect on Google's reputation of the fact that Google employee Nikhyl Singhal communicates in an inadequate fashion. For example: "Ward Mundy, Nov 1, 2013: +Nikhyl Singhal Your suggestion that developers have violated Google's terms of service and posed a security risk is disingenuous to put it charitably."

  29. kevin by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear Kevin,

    That is pretty cool, I guess. Not that I care what you think.

    Signed,
    Everyone else

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:kevin by balbus000 · · Score: 1

      Dear O('_')O_Bush,

      I'm a little sad that you don't care what I think, but I don't think I've told you yet.

      Signed,
      Kevin (not the article's author)

  30. Spam box by xgerrit · · Score: 1

    Google Voice is still great for having a spam-box phone number you can give to places that require a working phone number (car dealers, political organizations, etc.), but you don't really want to hear from. But if that's how it ends up being used, I don't think that's going to convince Google to keep it around. You can tell it's been unloved for some time now... The iPhone app (at least) was updated once all of last year, and the only thing in the update was a warning if you try to txt 911. (So it was probably prompted by a legal issue.)

    Maybe now that Google has a mobile phone OS and has to work with all the mobile carriers, there's outside pressure to hold Google Voice back. Well if it goes, so much for my spam-box.

  31. Anymore, Google has become... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    ...synomous with being spied upon. Because of their past goodness I would like to defend them, but when even the login to their services defaults to "staying logged in" even though they present that staying logged in could be a security risk makes one question Google's ultimate motives here. One would think that if Google truly valued privacy above all else Google would do what ever it takes to keep their user's secure above all else. I hate to hate on someone who has done me so good in the past, but what Google does in the present is what counts.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  32. Re:Backdoor details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a backdoor user, here is how to do it. The only cavot is you can not dial out with the desk phone hardware.

    Step one. Get a free SIP account. There are several providers, pick one. A SIP account will have an account looking like an email address/ User at provider format.

    Step 2. Get a free or paid DID (direct inward dial) phone number. This gives GV a number to forward to. Link it to your SIP account.

    Step 3. Get a SIP client, either a softphone for free or a ATA/IP phone. Connect it to your SIP account.

    Now you have a number GV can call. This works well for international travel. Take your IP phone with you. Family can call on your local GV number. Google forwards to the local IP Call number to link to a plain SIP VOIP call that you can take worldwide.

  33. "Enormous" effect? by sirwired · · Score: 1

    Google Voice is a rather tiny product that a relatively small portion of the user base ever uses. Which is good, because they'd almost certainly kill it if it did take off, since it makes pretty much no revenue, and almost certainly loses quite a bit of money per user. (Really, I'm not sure why they keep it going at all... I don't even see a glimmer of a viable business plan here.)

    I really doubt anything Google does to Google Voice (including simply pulling the plug) would have an "enormous" amount of bad PR.

    1. Re:"Enormous" effect? by porges · · Score: 1

      I always guessed that the business plan involved recording/transcribing all your calls, for no bad reason whatsoever, nope.

  34. Random guy stops using popular service by rebelwarlock · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, I had hotdogs today. Though I suppose that would be on slashdot too if I had written a fucking dissertation about it. Who gives a fuck if some random jackass stops using one of Google's apps?

  35. Re:All I can say to that is... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Doctor

  36. Timothy is dying by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    to see the next hollywood blockbuster movie.

    See? We can play that game too.

  37. prepaid wireless by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Google voice works great for those that hop between prepaid wireless providers. I've switched providers several times in the past few years and didn't have to deal with porting my number around (some mvnos are better than others when it comes to porting)... I just ported my long time cell number to GV and now it doesn't matter what phone number I have on my cell... Everyone can keep calling my "old" number at GV and it rings my cell. And if I lose or break my cell phone I can quickly repoint GV at another number (or not, since I get voice mails and sms's in my email so don't really *have* to answer the phone)

    1. Re:prepaid wireless by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Google voice works great for those that hop between prepaid wireless providers. I've switched providers several times in the past few years and didn't have to deal with porting my number around

      How do you deal with your outgoing calls coming from a strange number instead of from your Google Voice number?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    2. Re:prepaid wireless by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Google voice works great for those that hop between prepaid wireless providers. I've switched providers several times in the past few years and didn't have to deal with porting my number around

      How do you deal with your outgoing calls coming from a strange number instead of from your Google Voice number?

      I don't make many outbound calls, but if it were a problem, I'd just route them all through Google Voice.

  38. Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we seriously tag articles troll now? If so, beta actually serves a purpose...

    1. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The feature to tag articles has existed for years. Just click the little tag symbol under the summary of the article on the front page, type your tag in the text box and, press Enter.

  39. What makes slashdot great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The editors can post these lamest of stories and know that it prompt hilarious insightful comments. Most of the articles are not worth reading and the comments are good enough to vet that information, tear the article/pundit to shreds and provide more interesting information links. To me, it looks like the Lucy getting Charlie to attempt punting the US football. Or the diners on TV's Alice who continue to eat at Mels despite the awful food and coffee and owner. Its all about Alice, Vera and "Kiss my grits, Mel!" Flo. At this point, I could say the best thing to do if you really think slashdot is going to crap is not even respond to posts, for as long as you do, slashdot is just as entertaining and informative as it has ever been. It's because of you, I still open slashdot everyday. It's because of you that I post this. I just wanted to thank you all!

  40. Google voice is AWESOME! You can use it with talka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use google voice with my talkatone app on an ipad mini. I pay 20-40 a month depending on how much prepaid data I expect to use. I can use google voice as my number, to text/call/voicemail for an unlimited amount of time. I granted don't use more than 50min of voice a month or more than 20txt a month, but when I do it's nice to not pay extra for something so trivial. I hacked my way onto a senior plan with att last plan I payed for, it still cost about 60 a month with data. barely used a tenth of it's allowance, wasted money!

    I first thought this post was about google voice ending... lol, it's awesome! I would hate to see it go like google reader!

  41. Okay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do I give two shits if this dillhole stops using Google voice? Why is that news?
    Hell I love GV, it's a great service and have NEVER once though anything other then "damn I'm gonna have to pay for this someday, it's to damn good to be free..."

  42. Mistake in understanding. They criticize GOOGLE. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I have a huge number of tabs open now of discussions of Google Voice. People with technology backgrounds are saying negative things about Google and Google management.

    Sure, most of that will be read only by technologically-oriented people. But a perception of bad management makes it more difficult for Google to hire competent people. (It will always be easy to hire people who are not competent with technology.)

    And it's not just this one issue. There are many other issues of Google management receiving the same criticism: People are saying Google is sloppily managed. That is degrading the public perception of Google. Degraded public perception makes ALL management of the company more difficult.

  43. s/doosh/douch by mmell · · Score: 1

    And . . . thank you for saying what I was going to say before I said it.

  44. New WTF by mmell · · Score: 1

    How'd an insensitive clod such as yourself get a four digit slashdot UID? I can already see you have a very low IQ, but it's the low UID that fascinates me. Did you inherit it? I've heard that idiocy can be congenital.

    1. Re:New WTF by westhinksnickssuck · · Score: 1

      It's a high four-digit.

  45. Re:you definitely have issues. by mmell · · Score: 1
    I've used Google Voice for several years now and have encountered none of the issues you describe (more correctly - I've experienced all of those issues, and discovered that without exception they all traced back to my cellular provider's efforts to eliminate Google Voice).

    The latest salvo was when I upgraded my T-Mobile branded phone. It took me nearly an hour of Googling to find the information on Google which told me how to fix what multiple cellular providers have broken, and I can't find any way around the sim lock which prevents Google Wallet from doing tap-to-pay.

    In my experience, SMS/voice mail/TTP are broken by cellular providers attempting to keep Google off of their networks (except as a search provider prioritizing their products and services).

  46. Yellow journalism ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Sheesh, Google Voice isn't going anywhere.

    And by the way, those of us with jobs will always have more than one number ...

  47. Nothing to See Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply more click-bait brought to you buy the shill that is timothy.

  48. Use it as voicemail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have mentioned, there are plenty of reasons to use Google Voice. But even so, if the author only likes the voicemail transcription, why not just use that part? It's fairly straightforward to replace carrier-supplied voicemail with GV, and then you can get all those handy features with your normal number. (it also combines voicemail between your regular and GV numbers, which can be handy)

  49. id 39371 signing off by kwerle · · Score: 2

    Holy crap. Fuck you, non-editors.

  50. slashdot has turned to shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is shit now, and this new look is shit,

    what a fucking waste of time.

  51. it's good for a work phone number by amigabill · · Score: 1

    I'm home office. We just moved. I don't have to get a lot of customers to update my contact info, my phone number stays the same.

    Sometimes I go into the corporate office. My work number rings my desk phone there too.

    My work number rings my home office phone, my corporate office desk phone, and my cell phone. My cell phone is not a great only phone. Since the demise of flip-phones, people tend to have a hard time hearing me on "candybar" style smartphones that do not get long enough to reach both my ear and my voice.

    In my case, it's convenient.

    I've never used transcripting or anything else. To me, it's only a phone number. I have seen a few voicemail transcripts from GV. Tremendously terrible. Not worth seeing again, so that feature is disabled.

  52. Misleading headline / clickbait by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    This dipshit deliberately wanted everyone to believe that Google was discontinuing Google Voice, when what he really should have written was "I'm leaving Google Voice because I don't need it."

    Asswipe.

  53. I use it to merge phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have my old personal Cell attached to google voice now I use my work phone only now, and receive/make calls via Google voice. Bye bye personal cellphone bill.
    ( and no, I don't make many calls so my employer doesn't care )

  54. crippled by tleaf100 · · Score: 0

    death of another usless piece of google cripple work. only works in two places,usa and india. have tried to get it to work in europe,forget it,it never works for more than a few days and you have to have everything else on the phone turned off or try to get along with a device that thinks its in the usa permanently and you need a credit card that google except in usa,basicly none now,far too many problems to make it worth the hassle for a system that does'nt work properly. another google fail,getting bored with google cash grubbers,would be glad to see them gone and jailed in a few years time.

  55. VOIP for data-only plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talkatone, which uses Google Voice for calls, allows me to use my tablet to make voice calls over whatever Internet connection I have available (which is usually wifi either at home or over a 4g hotspot). It's my one real use for Google Voice, but is especially useful, particularly given that while playing Ingress with headphones on, I'm not all that likely to notice my $10 dumbphone ringing in my pocket.

    As for why I still have a dumbphone...why the hell would I want all that computing power on a device too small to do anything with without being driven to a fit of rage within seconds?

  56. DUH. What a misleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bad. slashdot.

  57. Use it as spam-phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google voice is the best to use for all your phone spam.

    You can search for a more or less easy to remember number -- like a number that is the similar to your cell phone number (family members and I never had problems to find a number where only the YYY differs in XXX-YYY-ZZZZ).

    You can provide it to all the stores that bug you for a number. You can also provide it to your pharmacy or dentist who like to remind you and push you to provide a number. It is sufficient for me to receive the unrequested dentist reminders me by a google voice transcript and not a annoying, ringing phone.

    Everyone talks about separate email addresses for spam, but no one talks about different phone numbers... it's time for a change!

  58. Yes, bad headline by DirtyAmish · · Score: 1

    My heart skipped when I saw that headline. I have used Google Voice since it came out. I use it as my main number because I can forward it to any number. It comes in very handy because I probably have had about a dozen phones since then and don't have to keep giving out my number. I use it on my resume. My phone is always off (I'm on a minute plan so I use it to make calls for that reason also), but I'm always on email so I am able to see when someone has called. I listen to the messages online. I'd be SOL without it.

  59. On number to rule them all by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    And insulate your other numbers from telemarketers and change of service. Filtering and transcription. Awesome.

  60. One number to rule them all, and in the darkness b by globeadue · · Score: 1

    Google voice remains relevant. I don't even want to bother reading the actual post. As a user from grand central days before google voice was google voice, the service remains just as viable and vital in my day to day life. So much so I don't even want a voice plan with my cell phone but carriers won't capitulate to that request on a cell phone purchase. 1. one number rings my cell, my work desk, gmail browser windows a. any given time, I'm 99.9 % likely to be near one of those. 2. caller filters a. unknown numbers are sent to vmail immediately b. friends get their own vmail greeting c. family always rings d. work gets routed to voice mail when I'm not on call and its not 9-5 during the week. 3. emailed notice of voicemail and texts 4. transcribed voicemail along with mp3 of voicemail 5. jobs and thus work phones come and go, cell phones come and go - the google voice # remains an ever constant 6. normal cell, outside cell reception, no call history of calls while outside reception area, gvoice shows missed calls etc once back in reception area. The only gripe is attachments to txts/sms messages are not sent to the gvoice client on android and no notice that there was an attachment either. 80% of the time the attachment can be found in my email copy of the txt. annoying esp when mass txts about birthday parties are sent and I don't even receive notice it was dropped. Or that google would reply back and say Recipient does not receive sms, please use alternate protocol.

    --
    ..just because you can, doens't mean you should...
  61. Re:One number to rule them all, and in the darknes by globeadue · · Score: 1

    meh - post was originally all nice and formated, but after submit, became a blob 8( oh well, sorry

    --
    ..just because you can, doens't mean you should...
  62. Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I'll probably be modded Redundant for saying this, but why the fuck did such a misleading headline make it past the (probably sleeping) editors?

  63. Google Voice offers a feature no cellphone offers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the ability to block calls, for free. Service providers like AT&T and Verizon only offer such abilities as a paid service and limit the number of numbers you can block. Google Voice lets you block as many as you want. The only limitation is it can't uniquely identify people that use caller ID blocking so it is still impossible to block them, and I don't know of any company offering the ability to block calls with bad caller ID info.